Unitarity Constraints in the SM with a singlet scalar
description
Transcript of Unitarity Constraints in the SM with a singlet scalar
2013. 7. 30 @ KIAS, Jubin Park 1
Unitarity Constraints in the SM
with a singlet scalar2013. 7. 30 @ KIAS
Jubin Parkcollaborated with Prof. Sin Kyu Kang,
and based on arXiv:1306.6713 [hep-ph]
2013. 7. 30 @ KIAS, Jubin Park 2
Contents1. Motivation
2. Model
3. How to derive the unitarity condition ?
4. Unitarity of S-matrix and Numerical Results : 4.1 <S> ≠ 0 case 4.2 <S> = 0 case
5. Implications : 5.1 Unitarized Higgs inflation
5.2 TeV scale singlet dark matter
2013. 7. 30 @ KIAS, Jubin Park 3
1. MotivationWhy a (singlet) scalar field ?
1. A new discovery of a scalar particle at LHC.
Higg particle in the SM ~ 124 ~ 126 GeV
??2. can modify the production and/or decay rates of the Higgs field.
B. Batell, D. McKeen and M. Pospelov, JHEP 1210, 104 (2012) [arXiv:1207.6252 [hep-ph]].S. Baek, P. Ko, W. -I. Park and E. Senaha, arXiv:1209.4163 [hep-ph].
2013. 7. 30 @ KIAS, Jubin Park 4
3. can supply a dark matter candidate by using a discrete Z_2 symmetryC. P. Burgess, M. Pospelov and T. ter Veldhuis, Nucl. Phys. B 619, 709 (2001) [hep-ph/0011335].E. Ponton and L. Randall, JHEP 0904, 080 (2009) [arXiv:0811.1029 [hep-ph]].
4. can give a solution of baryogenesis via the first of electroweak phase transi-tionS. Profumo, M. J. Ramsey-Musolf and G. Shaughnessy, JHEP 0708, 010 (2007)[arXiv:0705.2425 [hep-ph]].
5. can solve the unitarity problem of the Higgs inflation. G. F. Giudice and H. M. Lee, Phys. Lett. B 694, 294 (2011) [arXiv:1010.1417 [hep-ph]].
2013. 7. 30 @ KIAS, Jubin Park 5
Higgs mass implications on the sta-bility of the electroweak vacuum
Joan Elias-Miroa, Jose R. Espinosaa;b, Gian F. Giudicec,Gino Isidoric;d, Antonio Riottoc;e, Alessandro Strumiaf arXiv:1112.3022v1 [hep-ph]
The RG running of Higgs quartic coupling can give a useful hint about the structure of given theory at the very short distance
2013. 7. 30 @ KIAS, Jubin Park 6
Stabilization of the Electroweak Vacuum by a Scalar Threshold Effect
Joan Elias-Miro, Jose R. Espinosa, Gian F. Giudicec, Hyun Min Lee, Alessandro Strumia arXiv:1203.0237v1 [hep-ph]
The RG running of Higgs quartic coupling can give a useful hint about the structure of given theory at the very short distance
2013. 7. 30 @ KIAS, Jubin Park 7
But, (my) real motivation isIn fact, we want to study 2HD + 1S case, where the potential is generated radia-tively.So we have to consider the unitarity condition in this case.
But, I could not find any paper about this. Note that there are many papers about 2HD. So, I decided to attack this problem, and I tried to find a more easy case such as 1HD(SM) + 1S.Frankly speaking I found one paper, but they just consider a limited case not a general case.After all, I tried to study the unitarity constraints of the 1HD(SM) + 1S case first.
2013. 7. 30 @ KIAS, Jubin Park 8
2. ModelThe potential form is given by
★S is a singlet scalar and H is a Higgs particle in the SM.
2013. 7. 30 @ KIAS, Jubin Park 9
2. 1. <S> ≠ 0 =η , v
Mixing angles
𝐶 β=𝑣 /√𝑣2+η2 𝑆β=η /√𝑣2+η2
𝒗
𝜼
𝜷
2013. 7. 30 @ KIAS, Jubin Park 10
This is important !!!!
Three couplings can be rewritten in terms of physical masses, and
★
𝐶 β=𝑣 /√𝑣2+η2 𝑆β=η /√𝑣2+η2
2013. 7. 30 @ KIAS, Jubin Park 11
★ Stability conditions ★
2013. 7. 30 @ KIAS, Jubin Park 12
2. 2. <S> = 0 +
Imposing Z_2 symmetry, this case can give a Z_2 odd singlet scalar as a dark matter candidate.There is no bi-linear mixing term (~hs) in the potential.
2013. 7. 30 @ KIAS, Jubin Park 13
3. How to derive the unitarity con-straints ?
14
① The scattering amplitude
2013. 7. 30 @ KIAS, Jubin Park
Spin J partial wave
Differential cross section
② Optical theorem
+Imaginary part
in the forward direction
2013. 7. 30 @ KIAS, Jubin Park 15
③ Identity
+Finally,
Unitarity condition★
→
2013. 7. 30 @ KIAS, Jubin Park 16
General form of amplitude (s)with vanishing external particle masses
Four point vertex Three point vertex.
s t u
2013. 7. 30 @ KIAS, Jubin Park 17
4. Unitarity of S-matrix and Numerical Results
2013. 7. 30 @ KIAS, Jubin Park 18
4. 1. <S> ≠ 0 s , → Three vertex parts of is negligible !!!
Only, four vertex part is important !!!
0 0
→𝑎0=
116𝜋 𝐴
2013. 7. 30 @ KIAS, Jubin Park 19
Neutral states from >, >, >, >, >, >
A , B
For example,
Charged states just give the diagonal elements of ,which is equal to .
Note
2013. 7. 30 @ KIAS, Jubin Park 20
Perturbative unitarity can be given in terms of eigenvalues of ,
|λ𝐻4𝜋 ×𝑐 𝑖|< 12eigenvalues of
_0𝑇
The maximal eigenvalue can give the most strong bound !!
Therefore,★
2013. 7. 30 @ KIAS, Jubin Park 21
SM case >, >, >, >, >, >
(− λ𝐻4 𝜋 )(1 1
√81√8
0
1√8
34
14
0
1√8
14
34
0
0 0 0 12
)→SM limit
It is important to check the eigenvalue of →Therefore,★
2013. 7. 30 @ KIAS, Jubin Park 22
𝑇 𝑆𝑀=(1 1
√81
√80
1√8
34
14
0
1√8
14
34
0
0 0 0 12
) →The maximal eigenvalue of is
|λ𝐻4𝜋 ×𝟑𝟐|<12
of eigenvalues of
→→
2013. 7. 30 @ KIAS, Jubin Park 23
| λ𝐻4 𝜋 ×𝟑𝟐|< 12 and from =
TeVLee-Quigg-Thacker bound
2013. 7. 30 @ KIAS, Jubin Park 24
Again, we go back to 2. 1. <S> ≠ 0 s ,
As we check the characteristic equation of , we get this equa-tion,
with two trivial eigenvalues and of , where A and B are given by A , B .
2013. 7. 30 @ KIAS, Jubin Park 25
Also, from the eigenvalue of
|λ𝐻4𝜋 ×𝑐 𝑖|< 12 →This bound on the coupling is translated into the bound on the mass given by,
2013. 7. 30 @ KIAS, Jubin Park 26
Now let us find the eigenvalues,
→
A , B
First, we fix and check the allowed regions from the stability condi-tions,
2013. 7. 30 @ KIAS, Jubin Park 27
Allowed regions from unit. and stab. Unitarity
Stabilityλ𝑯𝑺≈𝟗 .𝟖 λ𝑯𝑺=1
λ𝑯𝑺=5
λ𝑯𝑺=9.8
λ𝑯𝑺=0
2013. 7. 30 @ KIAS, Jubin Park 28
After all, we get the contour plots
λ𝑯𝑺 0 λ𝑯𝑺 9.8
Allowed region
Allowed region
2013. 7. 30 @ KIAS, Jubin Park 29
From the maximum eigenvalue 3 of
126 GeV
|𝑎0|<12 |𝑎0|<
12|𝑎0|<1
|𝑎0|<1
2013. 7. 30 @ KIAS, Jubin Park 30
Neutral states from
4. 1. <S> ≠ 0 , >, >, >, >, >, >
matrix is written by where,
2013. 7. 30 @ KIAS, Jubin Park 31
Explicit form of scattering ampli-tudes
2013. 7. 30 @ KIAS, Jubin Park 32
The contour plots
λ𝑯𝑺 0 λ𝑯𝑺 9.8
2013. 7. 30 @ KIAS, Jubin Park 33
4. 2. <S> = 0 ,limit Note
matrix is written by >, >, >, >, >, >
00
00 → 2. 2. <S> 0 case
,limit
① No coupling !② The odd parity of s forbids following processes :→ , →
34 𝐵
2013. 7. 30 @ KIAS, Jubin Park 34
But because of no mixing between and ,we can not constrain the mass bound of .
and →The unitarity condition gives
𝑚h≤1√2
𝑀𝐿𝑄𝑇
2013. 7. 30 @ KIAS, Jubin Park 35
4. 2. <S> ≠ 0 s ,
The characteristic equa-tion is
with one trivial eigenvalue of .
2013. 7. 30 @ KIAS, Jubin Park 36
The contour plots
NoteThe maximal eigenvalue of is → →
𝑚h≤√2𝑀𝐿𝑄𝑇
2013. 7. 30 @ KIAS, Jubin Park 37
Let us summarize our results for a while.
2013. 7. 30 @ KIAS, Jubin Park 38
5. Implications5.1 Unitarized Higgs inflation
Potential :
From unitarity :
2013. 7. 30 @ KIAS, Jubin Park 39
Imposing the COBE result for normalization of the power spectrum, →
→GeV
2013. 7. 30 @ KIAS, Jubin Park 40
Mixing angle vs Mass of singlet scalar s
Allowed region
GeV↑
NoteVery small mixing allowed
2013. 7. 30 @ KIAS, Jubin Park 41
5.2 TeV scale singlet dark matter
Dominant annihilation channel :When TeV
Relic density :
Ω𝐷𝑀 h2=0.1138 ±0.0045From the 9-year WMAP result:
2013. 7. 30 @ KIAS, Jubin Park 42
vs Ω𝐷𝑀 h
2=0.1138 ±0.0045Unitarity
TeV★
2013. 7. 30 @ KIAS, Jubin Park 43
Conclusion
1. Taking into account full contributions to the scattering amplitudes, we have drived unitarity conditions that can be translated into bounds on the masses of sclar fields.
2. While the upper mass bound of the singlet scalar becomes divergent in the decoupling limit , the bound becomes very strong,GeV in the maximal angle .
2013. 7. 30 @ KIAS, Jubin Park 44
Conclusion
1. In the unitarized Higgs inflation scenario, a tiny mixing angle is required for the singlet scalar with around GeV mass.
2. In the TeV scale dark matter scenario, we have drived upper bound on the singlet scalar mass, TeV , by combining the observed relic abundance with the unitarity.