Unit One Introduction to Psychology, Research Methods, and Critical Thinking.

45
Unit One Introduction to Psychology, Research Methods, and Critical Thinking

Transcript of Unit One Introduction to Psychology, Research Methods, and Critical Thinking.

Page 1: Unit One Introduction to Psychology, Research Methods, and Critical Thinking.

Unit OneIntroduction to Psychology, Research Methods, and Critical

Thinking

Page 2: Unit One Introduction to Psychology, Research Methods, and Critical Thinking.

Psychology’s Major Perspectives

A Story;

On June 20th, 2001, after her husband had left for work, Andrea Yates, drowned her 5 children in the family bathtub. She told the police that she drowned the children to save them from burning in hell. A jury rejected her insanity defense, and she was sentenced to serve life in a psychiatric prison…

Page 3: Unit One Introduction to Psychology, Research Methods, and Critical Thinking.

The Andrea Yates Story

…In January 2005, a Texas Appeals Court Overturned her conviction because a psychiatrist for the prosecution had falsely testified that he had consulted for a Law and Order episode.

The Appeals Court stated that the false testimony may have contributed to the jury’s rejection of Yates insanity defense. Prosecutors declined to discuss whether Yates would be retried. Her defense attorney said he would not seek her immediate release, because she was receiving “excellent mental health care.”

Page 4: Unit One Introduction to Psychology, Research Methods, and Critical Thinking.
Page 5: Unit One Introduction to Psychology, Research Methods, and Critical Thinking.

What Do You Think?

Why do you think Andrea Yates murdered her

children?

Page 6: Unit One Introduction to Psychology, Research Methods, and Critical Thinking.

Perspectives

• Is the cause in her private mental functioning (cognitive perspective)?– She clearly had low self esteem– She believed she was possessed and

that her scalp was marked with a 666.– She told the police that her children

were not “developing correctly” and that drowning them was the only way to save them.

Page 7: Unit One Introduction to Psychology, Research Methods, and Critical Thinking.

Perspectives• Do we find the cause in her mental disorder that

may have a biological basis? (neuroscience and behavior genetics perspectives)?– Mood disorders run in families and did in

Andrea’s.– A sister an two brothers were on

antidepressants– Research indicates that brain chemistry plays

a role in psychological disorders.– Serotonin appears scarce in depression and

Andrea took herself off of her medicine about a month before the murders.

– Andrea’s husband claimed he had been pleading with doctors to prescribe his wife Haldol, used to treat individuals who hear voices or have delusional thoughts.

Page 8: Unit One Introduction to Psychology, Research Methods, and Critical Thinking.

Perspectives• Do we find the cause in her social

environment (behavioral and socio-cultural perspectives)?– Why did her doctor take her off of ant-

psychotic medicine?– Was it a family issue?– Andrea’s in-laws report that her husband

Russell was not socially supportive. He claimed he had never changed a diaper.

– How could he leave her alone with 5 children when she could barely take care of herself?

– Why, after doctors strongly recommended no more children, did he continue to get her pregnant again?

– Where was her extended family while all of this was going on?

Page 9: Unit One Introduction to Psychology, Research Methods, and Critical Thinking.

What important idea does this case convey?

Many factors shape human behavior!

Why Did She Do It?

Page 10: Unit One Introduction to Psychology, Research Methods, and Critical Thinking.

Are things Biological, Psychological, Social?

• What is the number one health threat in the United States?

• Obesity• Two-Thirds of American adults are

considered overweight and over half of them obese, double the rate of 40 years ago.

Page 11: Unit One Introduction to Psychology, Research Methods, and Critical Thinking.

Are things Biological, Psychological, Social?

• The biology of obesity questions the notion that being overweight is simply a matter of weak will.– Evolutionary advantage?– Early humans who could store the most food

were the most likely to survive. Was this passed on in genes?

– “Hardwired to expend as little energy as possible.” (Psychologist Paul Rozin)

– Twin Studies – Identical Twins? (body weight)

– Genetics influence the number of fat cells

Page 12: Unit One Introduction to Psychology, Research Methods, and Critical Thinking.

Are things Biological, Psychological, Social?

• A variety of Psychological factors may also contribute to obesity.– Clean our plate! “Eyes rule our

bellies.” (Barbara Ralls)– Eat until it’s gone? M&M’s study.

Small vs. Jumbo pack?– The more we restrain ourselves from

eating, the more we will eat when we become anxious, depressed, or break a diet. We then binge.

Page 13: Unit One Introduction to Psychology, Research Methods, and Critical Thinking.

Are things Biological, Psychological, Social?

• Finally, socio-cultural factors contribute to overeating as well. – America: “A culture of bigness.” “When

someone comes to your house, the worst thing you can do is not give them enough food.” (Paul Rozin)

– Quantity, not quality– Compared to the French, Americans eat

much more, but enjoy it much less, often hurrying through every meal.

– What kind of food is the most easily accessible? Healthy or unhealthy?

Page 14: Unit One Introduction to Psychology, Research Methods, and Critical Thinking.

So…Are things Biological, Psychological, Social?

“Everything is related to everything else.”

Page 15: Unit One Introduction to Psychology, Research Methods, and Critical Thinking.

STOP

Page 16: Unit One Introduction to Psychology, Research Methods, and Critical Thinking.

Case Studies

• Definition: A detailed study of a single individual, group, or event.

• There are 4 major uses of the case study in behavioral research:

Page 17: Unit One Introduction to Psychology, Research Methods, and Critical Thinking.

Case Studies

• 1.) A case study can be used as a source of insights and ideas, particularly in the early stages of investigating a specific topic.– Freud and his therapy

clients (Psychoanalysis)

– Piaget and his own children (Cognitive Development)

- All case studies.

Page 18: Unit One Introduction to Psychology, Research Methods, and Critical Thinking.

Case Studies

• 2.) Case studies may be used to describe particularly rare phenomena.– The study of

presidential assassins is limited to case studies of a few people who have killed or tried to kill U.S. Presidents.

– Investigations of mass murderers are also limited to case studies.

– “The Man Who Mistook His Wife for a Hat.”

Page 19: Unit One Introduction to Psychology, Research Methods, and Critical Thinking.

Case Studies

• 3.) Case studies can be used as psycho-biographies. – These involve using

psychological theories in an attempt to understand the lives of famous people.

• Ghandi• Da Vinci• Martin Luther• Nixon

Page 20: Unit One Introduction to Psychology, Research Methods, and Critical Thinking.

Case Studies

• 4.) Case studies provide illustrative anecdotes.– Researchers and teachers often use

case studies to illustrate general principles to students.

– Scientists must often convince others and case studies help to do so.

Page 21: Unit One Introduction to Psychology, Research Methods, and Critical Thinking.

Case Studies

• There are also at least 2 major limitations to case studies:– 1.) They are virtually useless in

providing evidence to test behavioral theories or treatments.• The lives and events studied often occur

in an uncontrolled fashion and without comparison information.

• No matter how reasonable a researchers explanations may be, you cannot rule out alternative explanations.

Page 22: Unit One Introduction to Psychology, Research Methods, and Critical Thinking.

Case Studies

– 2.) Most case studies rely on the observations of a single investigator.

• We often have no way of assessing the reliability of that single researcher’s observations and interpretations.

• Because the researcher may have some sort of vested interest in the outcome of the study, one must always be concerned about the self-fulfilling prophecy.

Page 23: Unit One Introduction to Psychology, Research Methods, and Critical Thinking.

BREAK

Page 24: Unit One Introduction to Psychology, Research Methods, and Critical Thinking.

Flaws in Surveys

• What are some of the flaws that you can think of with surveys?– Wording– Audience– Order– Who is asking?

Page 25: Unit One Introduction to Psychology, Research Methods, and Critical Thinking.

Flaws in Surveys

• Wording:– How can the wording

of a survey influence the responses given?

– “Sex” vs. “Relations”

– “Hate” vs. “Dislike”

– “Love” vs. “Like”

Page 26: Unit One Introduction to Psychology, Research Methods, and Critical Thinking.

Flaws in Surveys

• Audience:– How can the

audience to which the survey is given influence the responses?• Location and topic• How are the

questions asked?

Page 27: Unit One Introduction to Psychology, Research Methods, and Critical Thinking.

Flaws in Surveys

• Order:– How can the

order in which the questions are asked influence the responses?

-1.) Do you think the actions of the Sept. 11th attacks were wrong?

-2.) Does is anger you that American soldiers are dying in Iraq?

-3.) Do you think people in the Middle East are generally violent?

Page 28: Unit One Introduction to Psychology, Research Methods, and Critical Thinking.

Flaws in Surveys

• Who is asking?– How could the

person asking influence the answers given?• Race• Gender• Background• Inflection

Page 29: Unit One Introduction to Psychology, Research Methods, and Critical Thinking.

STOP

Page 30: Unit One Introduction to Psychology, Research Methods, and Critical Thinking.

Random Samples

• Why is it important to have random samples in survey research?– Some fun statistics:

• 68% of people roll toilet paper over the spool• 79% squeeze toothpaste from the top• 7% look behind the shower curtain when using

someone else’s bathroom• 80% of people eat corn on the cob in circles

instead of rows• 10% of people have seen a ghost• 7% of people have flossed their teeth with their

own hair

Page 31: Unit One Introduction to Psychology, Research Methods, and Critical Thinking.

Random Samples

• What was wrong with each one of those statistics?– Those responses

were the results of only about 7,000 people out of 25,000 surveyed.

Page 32: Unit One Introduction to Psychology, Research Methods, and Critical Thinking.

Random Samples

• Acquiring random samples is not as easy as it looks, but is very important to at least “attempt” to do with any survey.– American Idol (ughhh)

• How are their “phone or text in” surveys not as random as they seem?

• You better feel strong enough about your vote to want to pay $1.00 or whatever it is.

Page 33: Unit One Introduction to Psychology, Research Methods, and Critical Thinking.

Random Samples

• Obtaining random samples for any purpose is difficult. The government has had no more success than the private sector.– The 1970 lottery to determine the order of the

military draft was almost certainly unfair.– The 31 capsules for January were placed in

the bin first, then the 29 for February, and so on until the 31 for the next December.

– What do you think happened when the bin was not turned enough?

• The December Birthdays were drawn much earlier.

Page 34: Unit One Introduction to Psychology, Research Methods, and Critical Thinking.
Page 35: Unit One Introduction to Psychology, Research Methods, and Critical Thinking.

Correlation and Cause/Effect Misinterpretations

• What is Correlation? Seriously, who here knows?

• RELATIONSHIP….Not cause!• Correlation should not be interpreted as

a cause and effect. • It is very easy to misinterpret

correlation studies as a cause an effect issue, but this is not accurate.

• Pellagra example.

Page 36: Unit One Introduction to Psychology, Research Methods, and Critical Thinking.

Correlation and Cause/Effect Misinterpretations

A Story;

In the early twentieth century, thousands of Americans in the South died from Pellagra, a disease marked by dizziness, lethargy, running sores, and vomiting.

Page 37: Unit One Introduction to Psychology, Research Methods, and Critical Thinking.

Correlation and Cause/Effect Misinterpretations

Finding that families struck with the disease often had poor plumbing and sewage, many physicians concluded that pellagra was transmitted by poor sanitary conditions.

In contrast, Surgeon General Joseph Goldberger thought that the illness was caused by an inadequate diet.

Page 38: Unit One Introduction to Psychology, Research Methods, and Critical Thinking.

Correlation and Cause/Effect Misinterpretations

He felt that the correlation between sewage conditions and pellagra did not reflect a casual relationship, but that the correlation arose because the economically disadvantaged were likely to have poor diets, as well as poor plumbing.

So, how was the controversy resolved?

Page 39: Unit One Introduction to Psychology, Research Methods, and Critical Thinking.

Correlation and Cause/Effect Misinterpretations

Well, the answer demonstrates the importance of the scientific method.

To prove he was right, Goldberger not only had himself injected with the blood of a victim with sores all over his body, he found a victim with diarrhea and….ate his excrement!

He did NOT come down with pellagra!

Page 40: Unit One Introduction to Psychology, Research Methods, and Critical Thinking.

Correlation and Cause/Effect Misinterpretations

To further make his case, Goldberger asked two groups from a Mississippi state prison farm to volunteer for an experiment. One group was given a high carbohydrate, low protein diet that Goldberger suspected to be the culprit, while the other received a balanced diet. Within months, the first group was ravaged by pellagra, while the second showed no signs of the disease.

Page 41: Unit One Introduction to Psychology, Research Methods, and Critical Thinking.

STOP

Page 42: Unit One Introduction to Psychology, Research Methods, and Critical Thinking.

Mean, Median, Mode, and Range

• MEAN: The MEAN is the arithmetic average, the average you are probably used to finding for a set of numbers - add up the numbers and divide by how many there are: (80 + 90 + 90 + 100 + 85 + 90) / 6 = 89 1/6.

Page 43: Unit One Introduction to Psychology, Research Methods, and Critical Thinking.

Mean, Median, Mode, and Range

• MEDIAN: The MEDIAN is the number in the middle. In order to find the median, you have to put the values in order from lowest to highest, then find the number that is exactly in the middle:

• 80 85 90 90 90 100 ^ since there is an even number of values,

the MEDIAN is between these two, or it is 90. Notice that there is exactly the same number of values ABOVE the median as BELOW it!

Page 44: Unit One Introduction to Psychology, Research Methods, and Critical Thinking.

Mean, Median, Mode, and Range

• MODE: The MODE is the value that occurs most often. In this case, since there are 3 90's, the mode is 90. A set of data can have more than one mode.

• 80 85 90 90 90 100

Page 45: Unit One Introduction to Psychology, Research Methods, and Critical Thinking.

Mean, Median, Mode, and Range

• RANGE: The RANGE is the difference between the lowest and highest values. In this case 100 - 80 = 20, so the range is 20.

• The range tells you something about how spread out the data are. Data with large ranges tend to be more spread out.