UNIT I:Theory of the Consumer

53
UNIT I: Theory of the Consumer Introduction: What is Microeconomics? Theory of the Consumer Individual & Market Demand 6/24

description

UNIT I:Theory of the Consumer. Introduction: What is Microeconomics? Theory of the Consumer Individual & Market Demand. 6/24. Theory of the Consumer. Indifference Curves Utility Functions Optimization under Constraint Income & Substitution Effects. How do consumers make optimal choices?. - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Transcript of UNIT I:Theory of the Consumer

Page 1: UNIT I:Theory of the Consumer

UNIT I:Theory of the Consumer

• Introduction: What is Microeconomics?• Theory of the Consumer• Individual & Market Demand

6/24

Page 2: UNIT I:Theory of the Consumer

Theory of the Consumer

• Indifference Curves• Utility Functions• Optimization under Constraint• Income & Substitution Effects

 

How do consumers make optimal choices?

How do they respond to changes in prices and income?

Page 3: UNIT I:Theory of the Consumer

Utility Functions

X

U

Assume 1 Good:

U = 2X

Utility: The total amount of satisfaction one enjoys from a given level of consumption (X,Y)

Page 4: UNIT I:Theory of the Consumer

Utility Functions

X

U

Assume 1 Good:

X

U

U = 2X

MUx = U/X

= 2

Marginal Utility: The amount by which utility increases when consumption (of good X) increases by one unit

MUx = U/X

MUx

Page 5: UNIT I:Theory of the Consumer

Utility Functions

XX

U U

Assume 1 Good:

X

U

U

X

U = 2X

MUx = U/X

= 2

U (X)

We generally assume diminishing marginal utility

Page 6: UNIT I:Theory of the Consumer

Utility Functions

Y

X

U

Now Assume 2 Goods:

U (X)U (Y)

U = f(X,Y)

Page 7: UNIT I:Theory of the Consumer

Utility Functions

Y

X

U

U0 U1 U2 U3

U1

U2

U3

U0

U = f(X,Y)

Indifference curves

Page 8: UNIT I:Theory of the Consumer

Utility Functions

Y

X

U

U0 U1 U2 U3

U1

U2

U3

U0

U = f(X,Y)

XY

Page 9: UNIT I:Theory of the Consumer

Utility FunctionsMarginal Rate of Substitution (MRS): The rate at which a consumer is willing to trade between 2 goods. The amount of Y he is willing to give up for 1 unit of X.

Y Utility = No. of Apples + 2(No. of Oranges) U Along an indifference curve, U = 0

Therefore, MUxX + MUyY = 0- MUxX = MUyY

- (MUx/MUy)X = YY/X = - MUx/MUy

= MRS= slope

    

Generally, this rate will not be constant; it will depend upon the consumer’s endowment.

XY

Page 10: UNIT I:Theory of the Consumer

OptimizationWe assume that a rational consumer will attempt to maximize her utility. But utility increases with consumption of all goods, so utility functions have no maximum -- more is always better!

Y Utility = No. of Apples + 2(No. of Oranges)

U

X

Increasing utility

Page 11: UNIT I:Theory of the Consumer

OptimizationThe optimal consumption bundle places the consumer on the highest feasible indifference curve, given her preferences and the opportunities to trade (her income & the prices she faces).

Y Utility = No. of Apples + 2(No. of Oranges)

U

Y*

X* X

Indifference Curves depict consumer’s “willingness to trade”

Slope = - MRSBudget Constraint depicts “opportunities to trade”

Slope = - Px/Py

At point C, MRS = Px/Py, so consumer can’t improve thru trade.

C

Page 12: UNIT I:Theory of the Consumer

Two Conditions for Optimization under Constraint:

1. PxX + PyY = I Spend entire budget

2. MRSyx = Px/Py Tangency

Optimization

MRSyx = MUx/MUy = Px/Py

=> MUx/Px = MUy/Py

The marginal utility of the last dollar spent on each good should be the same.

Page 13: UNIT I:Theory of the Consumer

Optimization: An ExamplePat divides a monthly income of $1800 between consumption of food (X) and consumption of all other goods (Y). Pat’s preferences can be described by the following utility function:

U = X2Y

If the price of food is $1 and the price of all other goods is $2, find Pat’s optimal consumption bundle.

Pat should choose the combination of food and all other goods that places her on the highest feasible indifference curve, given her income and the prices she faces. This is the point where an indifference curve is tangent to the budget constraint (unless there is a comer solution).

Page 14: UNIT I:Theory of the Consumer

Optimization: An ExamplePat divides a monthly income of $1800 between consumption of food (X) and consumption of all other goods (Y). Pat’s preferences can be described by the following utility function:

U = X2Y

If the price of food is $1 and the price of all other goods is $2, find Pat’s optimal consumption bundle.

Since Pat’s utility function is U = X2Y, MUx = 2XY and MUy = X2. MRS = (-)MUx/MUy = (-)2XY/X2 = (-)2Y/X. Setting this equal to the (-)price ratio (Px/Py), we find ½ = 2Y/X, X = 4Y. This is Pat’s optimal ratio of the goods, given prices.

Page 15: UNIT I:Theory of the Consumer

Optimization: An ExamplePat divides a monthly income of $1800 between consumption of food (X) and consumption of all other goods (Y). Pat’s preferences can be described by the following utility function:

U = X2Y

If the price of food is $1 and the price of all other goods is $2, find Pat’s optimal consumption bundle.

To find Pat’s optimal bundle, we substitute the optimal ratio into the budget constraint: I = PxX + PyY, 1800 = (1)X + (2)Y,

1800 = (1)4Y + (2)Y = 6Y, so

Y* = 300, X* = 1200.

Page 16: UNIT I:Theory of the Consumer

Y

X

900

Y*=300

600 X*=1200

U = XY

Optimization: An ExampleGraphically:

Maximize: U = X2Y

Subject to: I = PxX + PyY

I = 1800; Px = $1; Py = $2

Y* = 300, X* = 1200.

Page 17: UNIT I:Theory of the Consumer

Optimization: An ExamplePat divides a monthly income of $1800 between consumption of food (X) and consumption of all other goods (Y). Pat’s preferences can be described by the following utility function:

U = X2Y

Now suppose the price of food rises to $2.

MRS = (-)2Y/X. Setting this equal to the new (-)price ratio (Px/Py), we find 1 = 2Y/X, X = 2Y. Substituting in Pat’s new budget constraint: I = PxX + PyY, 1800 = (2)X + (2)Y,

1800 = (2)2Y + (2)Y = 6Y, so

Y** = 300, X** = 600.

Page 18: UNIT I:Theory of the Consumer

Y

X

900

Y**=300

X**= 600 12001200

U = XY

Optimization: An ExampleGraphically:

Now: U = X2Y

I = 1800; Px’ = $2; Py = $2

Y* = 300, X* = 600.

Page 19: UNIT I:Theory of the Consumer

Y

X

900

Y**=300

X**= 600 1200 1200

U = XY

Graphically:Because the relative price of food has increased, Pat will consume less food (and more of all other goods). This the substitution effect. But because Pat is now relatively poorer (her purchasing power has decreased), she will consume less of both goods. This is the income effect.

Income & Substitution Effects

S

S

Page 20: UNIT I:Theory of the Consumer

Y

X

900

Y**=300

X**= 600 1200 1200

U = XY

Graphically:But because Pat is now relatively poorer (her purchasing power has decreased), she will consume less of both goods. This is the income effect.

In this case, the 2 effects are equal and opposite for Y, additive for X.

Income & Substitution Effects

Page 21: UNIT I:Theory of the Consumer

Individual & Market Demand

• Income & Substitution Effects (from last time)• Normal, Inferior, and Giffen Goods• Consumer Demand• Price Elasticity of Demand• Next Time: The Theory of the Firm

 

Page 22: UNIT I:Theory of the Consumer

Individual & Market Demand

We have seen how consumers make optimal choices. A rational consumer will attempt to maximize utility subject to market conditions (relative prices) and income. That is, given I, Px, Py, she chooses X and Y to maximize U.

Now, we want to ask, how do changes in prices effect these consumption decisions? X = f(Px).

We will see that changes in prices affect quantities through two causal channels: Income and substitution effects.

Page 23: UNIT I:Theory of the Consumer

Y

XNow his wage rises to$12/hr for the first 40 hrs/wk; it remains $8/hr above 40

hrs/wk.

1200

960

800

50 60 100 1200

Bullwinkle Moose faces a choice between leisure (X) and income (Y). He can work up to 100 hours a week at a wage of $8/hr. Initially, he chooses to work 50 hrs/wk.

Income & Substitution Effects

Draw his new budget constraint.

Page 24: UNIT I:Theory of the Consumer

Y

XNow his wage rises to$12/hr for the first 40 hrs/wk; it remains $8/hr above 40

hrs/wk.

1200

960

800

50 60 100 1200

Bullwinkle Moose faces a choice between leisure (X) and income (Y). He can work up to 100 hours a week at a wage of $8/hr. Initially, he chooses to work 50 hrs/wk.

Income & Substitution Effects

Will he work more than, less than, or equal to 50 hrs/wk?

What is the income effect?

His purchasing power is greater, so he will consume

more leisure, work less.

Page 25: UNIT I:Theory of the Consumer

Y

XNow his wage rises to$12/hr for the first 40 hrs/wk; it remains $8/hr above 40

hrs/wk.

1200

960

800

50 60 100 1200

Bullwinkle Moose faces a choice between leisure (X) and income (Y). He can work up to 100 hours a week at a wage of $8/hr. Initially, he chooses to work 50 hrs/wk.

Income & Substitution Effects

Will he work more than, less than, or equal to 50 hrs/wk?

What is the substitution effect?

At 50 hrs/wk., the new wage rate is the same as the old ($8/hr).

=> no substitution effect!

Px/Py = 8

Page 26: UNIT I:Theory of the Consumer

Pat divides a monthly income of $1800 between consumption of food (X) and consumption of all other goods (Y). Pat’s preferences can be described by the following utility function:

U = X2Y

Originally, the price of food is $1 and the price of all other goods is $2. Then the price of food rises to $2.

Because the relative price of food has increased, Pat will consume less food (and more of all other goods). This the substitution effect. But because Pat is now relatively poorer (her purchasing power has decreased), she will consume less of both goods. This is the income effect..

Income & Substitution Effects

Page 27: UNIT I:Theory of the Consumer

Y

X

900

Y**=300

X**= 600 1200 1200

Because the relative price of food has increased, Pat will consume less food (and more of all other goods). This the substitution effect.

Income & Substitution Effects

S

S

Page 28: UNIT I:Theory of the Consumer

Y

X

900

Y**=300

X**= 600 1200 1200

U = XYBut because Pat is now relatively poorer (her purchasing power has decreased), she will consume less of both goods. This is the income effect.

In this case, the 2 effects are equal and opposite for Y, additive for X.

Income & Substitution Effects

Page 29: UNIT I:Theory of the Consumer

Y

X

900

Y**=300

X**= 600 1200 1200

The move from A to B is the substitution effect;B to C is the income effect.

B is a point on the original indifference curve, tangent to

the new budget constraint, indicating the bundle the

consumer would choose at the new prices.

Income & Substitution Effects

AB

C

S

I

I

S

Page 30: UNIT I:Theory of the Consumer

Y

X

900

Y**=300

X**= 600 1200 1200

U = X2Y

We are looking for a point on the indifference curve that includes

Y = 300, X = 1200, for which MRS = 1 (the new price ratio):

At point B, MRS = 2Y/X = 1=> X = 2Y.

Also, Ua = Ub = 432,000,000

U = X2Y4Y3 = 432,000,000

Y3 = 108,000,000Yb = 476; Xb = 952

Income & Substitution Effects

AB

C

S

I

I

S

Page 31: UNIT I:Theory of the Consumer

Y

X

900

Y**=300

X**= 600 1200 1200

U = X2Y4Y3 = 432,000,000

Y3 = 108,000,000Yb = 476; Xb = 952

So the substitution effect is a decrease in X of 248 and an

increase in Y of 176.

The income effect is a decrease in X of 352

and a decrease in Yof 176.

Income & Substitution Effects

AB

C

S

I

I

S

Page 32: UNIT I:Theory of the Consumer

Y

X

900

Y**=300

X**= 600 1200 1200

How much would Pat be willing to pay to avoid this price increase?

Income & Substitution Effects

Page 33: UNIT I:Theory of the Consumer

Y

X

900

Y**=300

X**= 600 1200 1200

To calculate this amount, start by finding the minimum

income Pat needs to purchase a bundle on the new indifference curve.

Income & Substitution Effects

Page 34: UNIT I:Theory of the Consumer

Y

X

900

Y**=300

X**= 600 1200 1200

The difference between the market price of this bundle

and her income ( = 1800) is the amount she’d be willing

to pay to avoid the price increase. We call this the

equivalent variation measure of utility loss.

Income & Substitution Effects

Page 35: UNIT I:Theory of the Consumer

Normal & Inferior Goods

X

Y

Income-Expansion Path

Normal Good

For most goods, the quantity consumed will increase as income increases.

We call these normal goods. Y = f(X)

optimal ratio

Page 36: UNIT I:Theory of the Consumer

Normal & Inferior Goods

XX

Y Income

Engels Curve

Normal Good

Income-Expansion Path

X = f(I)

Page 37: UNIT I:Theory of the Consumer

Normal & Inferior Goods

X

Y

Inferior Good

For some goods, consumption will decrease at higher levels of income (e.g., hamburger).

We call these inferior goods.

Income-Expansion Path

Page 38: UNIT I:Theory of the Consumer

Normal & Inferior Goods

XX

Y Income

Engels Curve

Inferior Good

Income-Expansion Path

Page 39: UNIT I:Theory of the Consumer

Normal & Inferior Goods

X

Y

Normal Good

BA

B

A

X

Y

SS

Px = 1Px = 2

Px increases from $1 to $2.

The movement from A to B is the

substitution effect.

Page 40: UNIT I:Theory of the Consumer

Normal & Inferior Goods

X

Y

Normal Good

BA

Inferior Good

B

A

For both normal and inferior goods, the substitution effect is negative: consumption will increase as price decreases.

X

Y

SS

Px = 1Px = 2

Px increases from $1 to $2.

Page 41: UNIT I:Theory of the Consumer

Normal & Inferior Goods

X

Y

Normal Good

BA

C

Inferior Good

B

A

C

For normal goods the income effect is positive, and for inferior goods it is negative.

II

Y

X

Page 42: UNIT I:Theory of the Consumer

Normal & Inferior Goods

X

Y

Giffen Good

BA

C

C

A

For some inferior goods, the income effect is so large it outweighs the substitution effect (eg., ?).

S

I

Px

2

1

X

Px = 1

Px = 2

… giving rise to a upward sloping

demand curve.

Page 43: UNIT I:Theory of the Consumer

Do any of these cases violate the assumptions of well-behaved preferences that we look at last time?

No. Well-behaved preferences can give rise to all sorts of demand curves (depending on income and prices).

Normal & Inferior Goods

Page 44: UNIT I:Theory of the Consumer

Y

X

900

Y**=300

400 1200

Consumer DemandU = X2YI = 1800; Py = 2

Px*** = $3 Y*** = 300, X*** = 400.

Page 45: UNIT I:Theory of the Consumer

Consumer Demand

XX

Y

:

Px

Px = 3 2 1 400 600 1200

Demand Curve

3

2

1

X = f(Px)

400 3

600 2

1200 1

U = X2YI = 1800; Py = 2

Find the equation for the demand

curve.

Page 46: UNIT I:Theory of the Consumer

Consumer Demand

XX

Y

U = X2YI = 1800; Py = 2

Px

Px = 3 2 1 400 600 1200

Demand Curve

3

2

1

X = f(Px)

400 3

600 2

1200 1

MUx = 2XY; MUy = X2

MRS = 2Y/X = Px/Py = Px/2

=> Y = (1/4)PxX

I = PxX + PyY

1800 = PxX + (2)(1/4)PxX

= (3/2)PxX

X = 1200/Px

Solve for Y & substitute

Page 47: UNIT I:Theory of the Consumer

Consumer Demand

XX

Y

:

Px

Px = 3 2 1 400 600 1200

Demand Curve

3

2

1

Price-Consumption Curve

U = X2YI = 1800; Py = 2

In this case, consumption of Y is

unaffected by changes in Px. Cross-price

elasticity is zero.

Page 48: UNIT I:Theory of the Consumer

Consumer Demand

XX

Y

Px

X

Px

Price-Consumption Curve Demand Curve

3

2

1

Or, cross-price elasticity can be

positive ...

… with a smaller response in demand.

Page 49: UNIT I:Theory of the Consumer

Consumer Demand

XX

Y

:

Px

Px = 3 2 1 400 600 1200

Demand Curve

3

2

1

Price-Consumption Curve

U = X2YI = 1800; Py = 2

Px

X

Page 50: UNIT I:Theory of the Consumer

Price Elasticity of Demand

Price Elasticity of Demand (Ep) Measures how sensitive quantity demanded is to changes in price.

Demand Equation: Qd = a – bP

Ep = (%Q)/(%P) = Q/Q)/(P/P) = Q/P(P/Q) = -b(P/Q)

Ep < 1 Inelastic: Total expenditure increases as price increases.

Ep > 1 Elastic: Total expenditure decreases as price increases.

Ep = 1 Unit Elastic: Total expenditure doesn’t change

Page 51: UNIT I:Theory of the Consumer

Non-Price Determinants of Demand

What determines consumer demand?

• Preferences • Income• Prices of Related Goods

– Substitutes– Complements

Page 52: UNIT I:Theory of the Consumer

Determinants of Price Elasticity

What determines price elasticity of demand?

• Substitutes (+)• Budget share

– Normal (+)– Inferior ( -)

• Short v long run (+) ex. Oil• Network Effects• Bandwagon and Snob Effects

normal goods have higher elasticities, because income effect reinforces substitution effect.

Page 53: UNIT I:Theory of the Consumer

Next Time

6/29 Theory of the Firm

Pindyck, Ch 6.

Besanko ,Chs 6-7.

or

Varian, Chs 18, 20-21.