Unit 3 Groups and Group Dynamics

download Unit 3 Groups and Group Dynamics

of 92

Transcript of Unit 3 Groups and Group Dynamics

  • 7/31/2019 Unit 3 Groups and Group Dynamics

    1/92

    Unit 3

  • 7/31/2019 Unit 3 Groups and Group Dynamics

    2/92

    Group behavior

    Defining and forming groups Stages of groupdevelopment group properties Group decisionmaking techniques

    Teams

    Interpersonal skills - Johari window

    Conflict

    Transactional analysis Employee Counselling

  • 7/31/2019 Unit 3 Groups and Group Dynamics

    3/92

    Group Meaning

    Two or more individuals, interacting andinterdependent, who have come together to achieveparticular objectives.

  • 7/31/2019 Unit 3 Groups and Group Dynamics

    4/92

    Individual

    contributions

    Individualoutcomes

    Commongoals

    Demands ofmanagement

    Performance

    Depends on

    Accountability forOutcomes rests on

    Members areInterested in.

    Responsive to

    Individual

    Contributions &collective Workproducts

    Mutual outcomes

    Common goalsAnd commitment

    To purpose

    Self-imposeddemands

    GROUPS TEAMS

    Groups Vs Teams

  • 7/31/2019 Unit 3 Groups and Group Dynamics

    5/92

    Why do people join groups? Security

    Status

    Self-esteemAffiliation

    Power

    Goal Achievement.

  • 7/31/2019 Unit 3 Groups and Group Dynamics

    6/92

    Classification of Groups

    Formal Group A designated work group defined by the

    organizations structure.

    Informal Group A group that is neither formally structured nor

    organizationally determined; It appears inresponse to the need for social contact

    Command Group A group composed of the individuals who report

    directly to a given manager.

  • 7/31/2019 Unit 3 Groups and Group Dynamics

    7/92

    Continued.

    Task Group

    Those working together to complete a job task.

    Interest Group

    Those working together to attain a specific objectivewith which each is concerned.

    Friendship Group.

    Those brought together because they share one ormore common characteristics.

  • 7/31/2019 Unit 3 Groups and Group Dynamics

    8/92

    Stages of Group Development

    1. The Five Stage ModelI Forming Stage

    II Storming Stage

    III Norming Stage

    IV Performing Stage

    V Adjourning Stage.

    2. An Alternative Model for Temporary Groups withdeadlines

  • 7/31/2019 Unit 3 Groups and Group Dynamics

    9/92

    Forming Stage

    The First Stage in group

    development, characterized

    by much uncertainty.

    Storming Stage

    The second stage in groupdevelopment, characterized by

    intragroup conflict. At the end

    there is clear hierarchy of

    Leadership.

    Stage I

    Stage II

    Five-Stage Group Development Model

  • 7/31/2019 Unit 3 Groups and Group Dynamics

    10/92

    Stage IIINorming Stage

    It is characterized by closerelationship and cohesiveness.

    The group has common set of

    expectations of what defines

    correct member behavior

    Stage IVPerforming Stage

    The group is fully functional.Group energy has moved from

    getting to know each other to

    performing the task at hand.

  • 7/31/2019 Unit 3 Groups and Group Dynamics

    11/92

    Stage V Adjourning Stage

    The final stage in group

    Development for

    temporary groups,characterized by

    concern with wrapping

    up activities

    rather than task

    performance.

    Continued..

  • 7/31/2019 Unit 3 Groups and Group Dynamics

    12/92

    Alternative Model for Temporary groups

    with deadlines

    The Punctuated-Equilibrium Model

  • 7/31/2019 Unit 3 Groups and Group Dynamics

    13/92

    Group Properties1. Roles

    2. Norms

    3. Status4. Size

    5. Cohesiveness

  • 7/31/2019 Unit 3 Groups and Group Dynamics

    14/92

    1. Roles

    A set of expected behavior pattern attributed to someoneoccupying a given position in a social unit. Role identity

    Certain attitudes and behaviors consistent with a role.

    Role perception An individuals view of how he or she is supposed to act in a given

    situation.

    Role Expectations

    How others believe a person should act in a given situation.

    Psychological contract an unwritten agreement that sets out whatmanagement expects from an employee and vice versa.

    Role conflict

    A situation in which an individual is confronted by divergent roleexpectations

  • 7/31/2019 Unit 3 Groups and Group Dynamics

    15/92

    2. Norms

    Acceptable standards of behavior within a group thatare shared by the groups members.

    Common classes of norms

    Performance norms

    Appearance norms

    Social arrangement norms Allocation of resources norms

  • 7/31/2019 Unit 3 Groups and Group Dynamics

    16/92

    Continued. Conformity

    Adjusting ones behavior to align with the norms of the group.

    Deviant workplace behavior

    Voluntary behavior that violates significant organizationalnorms and, in doing so, threatens the well-being of theorganization or its members

  • 7/31/2019 Unit 3 Groups and Group Dynamics

    17/92

    Typology of Deviant Workplace Behavior

    Category Examples

    Production Leaving earlyIntentionally working slowly

    Wasting resourcesProperty Sabotage

    Lying about hours workedStealing from the organization

    Political Showing favoritismGossiping and spreading rumorsBlaming coworkers

    Personal Aggression Sexual harassmentVerbal abuse

    Stealing from coworkers

  • 7/31/2019 Unit 3 Groups and Group Dynamics

    18/92

    3. Status

    Group Norms

    Status Equity

    Culture

    Group Member

    Status

    A socially defined position or rank given to groups or groupmembers by others.

    Power overOthers

    Ability to

    Contribute

    PersonalCharacteristics

  • 7/31/2019 Unit 3 Groups and Group Dynamics

    19/92

    4. Size

    Size

    Smaller groups are better at completing tasks

    Individuals perform better in smaller groups

    If the goal of the group is fact finding, larger groups areeffective; smaller groups are better at doing somethingproductive with the input.

    Social loafing

    The tendency for individuals to expend less effort when workingcollectively than when working individually.

  • 7/31/2019 Unit 3 Groups and Group Dynamics

    20/92

    Continued.

    Group Size

    Performance

    Other conclusions:

    Odd number groups dobetter than even.

    Groups of 7 or 9 performbetter overall than largeror smaller groups.

    Social LoafingThe tendency for individuals to expend less effort whenworking collectively than when working individually.

  • 7/31/2019 Unit 3 Groups and Group Dynamics

    21/92

    5. Cohesiveness

    Increasing group cohesiveness:

    1. Make the group smaller.

    2. Encourage agreement with group goals.

    3. Increase time members spend together.

    4. Increase group status and admission difficultly.

    5. Stimulate competition with other groups.

    6. Give rewards to the group, not individuals.

    7. Physically isolate the group.

    Cohesiveness

    Degree to which group members are attracted toeach other and are motivated to stay in the group.

  • 7/31/2019 Unit 3 Groups and Group Dynamics

    22/92

    Group think

    Group pressures for conformity

    Deters the group from critically appraising unusual,minority or unpopular views.

    Hinders performance.

  • 7/31/2019 Unit 3 Groups and Group Dynamics

    23/92

    Group Shift

    A change in decision between a groups decisionand an individual decision that a member withinthe group would make; the shift can be towardeither conservatism or greater risk.

    Members exaggerate the initial position they hold. Reasons for the shift

    Discussion creates familiarization Members become more comfortable, bold and daring. Developed nations value risk. Group diffuses responsibility.

  • 7/31/2019 Unit 3 Groups and Group Dynamics

    24/92

    Group decision-making technique

    Interacting groups

    Typical groups, in which members interact with eachother face-to-face

    Brainstorming

    An idea generation process that specifically encourages

    any and all alternatives, while withholding any criticismof those alternatives.

  • 7/31/2019 Unit 3 Groups and Group Dynamics

    25/92

    Continued. Nominal group technique

    A group decision making method in which individualmembers meet face-to-face to pool their judgments in a

    systematic but independent fashion

    Electronic meeting

    A meeting in which members interact on computers,allowing for anonymity of comments and aggregation of

    votes

  • 7/31/2019 Unit 3 Groups and Group Dynamics

    26/92

    Group decision-making techniqueStrengths

    More completeinformation andknowledge

    Diversity of views

    Increased acceptance ofa solution

    Weaknesses

    Conformity pressures ingroups

    Time consuming

    Dominated by one or a

    few members

  • 7/31/2019 Unit 3 Groups and Group Dynamics

    27/92

    TEAMS

  • 7/31/2019 Unit 3 Groups and Group Dynamics

    28/92

    Working in Teams Teams Vs Groups Types of teams Creating effective

    teams Turning individuals into team players

  • 7/31/2019 Unit 3 Groups and Group Dynamics

    29/92

    Difference between Groups and Teams Two or more individuals, interacting and interdependent,

    who have come together to achieve particular objectives iscalled a GROUP.

    AWORK GROUP is a group that interacts primarily toshare information and to make decisions to help eachmember perform within his or her area of responsibility.

    AWORK TEAM is a group whose individual efforts resultin a performance that is greater than the sum of theindividual inputs.

  • 7/31/2019 Unit 3 Groups and Group Dynamics

    30/92

    Comparing Work groups and Work teams

    Work groups Work teams

    Share information

    Neutral (sometimes ve)

    Individual

    Random and Varied

    Collective Performance

    Positive

    Individual and mutual

    Complementary

    Goal

    Synergy

    Accountability

    Skills

  • 7/31/2019 Unit 3 Groups and Group Dynamics

    31/92

    Types of teams

    Problem Solving Teams

    Self-managed Work teams

    Cross-functional Teams

    Virtual teams

  • 7/31/2019 Unit 3 Groups and Group Dynamics

    32/92

    Types of teams Problem Solving Teams Groups of 5 to 12 employees from the same department who meet for a few

    hours each week to discuss ways of improving quality, efficiency, and thework environment.

    Self-managed Work teams Groups of 10 to 15 people who take on responsibilities of their former

    supervisors

    Cross-functional Teams Employees from about the same hierarchical level, but from different work

    areas, who come together to accomplish a task

    Virtual teams Teams that use computer technology to tie together physically dispersed

    members in order to achieve a common goal.

  • 7/31/2019 Unit 3 Groups and Group Dynamics

    33/92

    TEAM EFFECTIVENESS

    ContextAdequate resourcesLeadership & StructureClimate of trustPerformance Evaluation&Reward Systems

    CompositionAbilities of membersPersonalityAllocating roles**

    DiversitySize of teamsMember flexibilityMember preferences

    Work designAutonomySkill varietyTask identityTask significance

    ProcessCommon purposeSpecific GoalsTeam EfficacyConflict levels

    Social loafing

  • 7/31/2019 Unit 3 Groups and Group Dynamics

    34/92

    Allocation of roles Key roles Linker

    Coordinates and integrates

    Creator Initiates creative ideas

    Promoter Champions ideas after they are initiated

    Assessor Offers insightful analysis of options

    Organizer Provides Structure

  • 7/31/2019 Unit 3 Groups and Group Dynamics

    35/92

    Continued Producer

    Provides direction and follow-through

    Controller Examines details and enforces rules

    Maintainer

    Fights external battlesAdviser

    Encourages the search for more information

  • 7/31/2019 Unit 3 Groups and Group Dynamics

    36/92

    Turning individuals into team players

    The challenge To communicate openly and honestly

    To confront differences and resolve conflicts

    To sublimate personal goals for the good of the team Challenge will be more when

    The national culture is highly individualistic

    Teams are being introduced into an established organization thathas historically valued individual achievements.

    Shaping team players Selection

    Training

    Rewards

  • 7/31/2019 Unit 3 Groups and Group Dynamics

    37/92

    Discussion Topic.. Informal teams exist in almost every form of social

    organization. What types of informal groups exist inyour classroom?

    Why are students motivated to belong to theseinformal groups?

  • 7/31/2019 Unit 3 Groups and Group Dynamics

    38/92

    Interpersonal BehaviorTransactional Analysis

  • 7/31/2019 Unit 3 Groups and Group Dynamics

    39/92

    Interpersonal behaviorAnalysis of self awareness

    Analysis of ego states (Structural Analysis)

    Transactional analysis Life-position analysis

    Stroking

    Games analysis

    Script analysis.

  • 7/31/2019 Unit 3 Groups and Group Dynamics

    40/92

    Analysis of Self Awareness Self awareness is a cognitive concept, it describes the

    self in terms of image, both conscious andunconscious.

    Joseph Luft and Harrington Ingham havedeveloped a diagram to look at ones personalityincluding behaviors and attitudes that can be knownand unknown to self and known and unknown toothers

  • 7/31/2019 Unit 3 Groups and Group Dynamics

    41/92

    Johari Window

    Blind

    UnknownHidden

    Informationknown to others

    Information notKnown to others

    InformationKnown to self

    Information notknown to self

    Open

  • 7/31/2019 Unit 3 Groups and Group Dynamics

    42/92

    Analysis of Ego StatesAn ego state is a pattern of behavior that a person

    develops as he or she grows, based on his or her

    accumulated network of feelings and experiences. Ego states are a persons way of thinking, feeling and

    behaving at anytime.

    TA uses Freudian psychoanalytic theory as abackground for identifying 3 important ego states Parent Ego

    Adult Ego and

    Child Ego

  • 7/31/2019 Unit 3 Groups and Group Dynamics

    43/92

    Parent ego state

    Values, attitudes and behaviors of parents becomean integral part of the personality of an individual.

    The characteristics of a person with parent ego are:Judgmental

    Value laden

    Rule maker

    Moralizing

    Over protective

    Distant

    Dogmatic

    Indispensable

    Upright

  • 7/31/2019 Unit 3 Groups and Group Dynamics

    44/92

    Parent ego state contd.

    Types

    Nurturing parent Ego

    Reflects sympathetic protective and nurturing behavior thatnot only towards children but also to other people ininteraction.

    Critical / Regulating Parent Ego

    Shows critical and evaluative behavior in interaction with

    others. This ego state attacks peoples personalities

  • 7/31/2019 Unit 3 Groups and Group Dynamics

    45/92

    Adult Ego StateAuthentic, direct, reality based, rational, fact

    seeking and problem solving

    People with adult ego state gather relevantinformation, carefully analyze it and generatealternatives and make alternative choices.

    This ego state can be identified by verbal andphysical signs which includes thoughtfulconcentration and factual discussion Responds to reality Does not have any values or emotions; called a task

    function

  • 7/31/2019 Unit 3 Groups and Group Dynamics

    46/92

  • 7/31/2019 Unit 3 Groups and Group Dynamics

    47/92

    Child Ego State Contd.. Forms of Child Ego State

    Natural Child

    Affectionate, impulsive, uncensored and curious,fearful, rebellious and curious.

    Creative / The Little Professor

    Intuitive, creative and manipulative.

    The Adaptive Child The adaptive child is the trained one and he is likely to

    do what parents insist on and sometimes learn to feelnon OK.

  • 7/31/2019 Unit 3 Groups and Group Dynamics

    48/92

    Transactional Analysis

    The unit of social intercourse is called a Transaction.

    If 2 or more people encounter each other in a social

    aggregation, one of them will speak or give some otherindication of acknowledging the presence of theother.Transactional stimulus.

    Another person will say or do something which is insome way related to this stimulus..Transactionalresponse.

  • 7/31/2019 Unit 3 Groups and Group Dynamics

    49/92

    Transactional Analysis ContdA transaction is the act of communication or,

    interaction between two people. A transaction

    starts with a stimulus and ends with aresponse.

    Transactions are of 3 types

    Complementary transactions

    Crossed transactions

    Ulterior transactions

  • 7/31/2019 Unit 3 Groups and Group Dynamics

    50/92

    Complementary Transactions

    If the response is by the same ego-state as the one

    which received the message, it is called acomplementary or parallel transaction.

    P

    A

    C

    P

    A

    C

    Subordinate: Would you like to

    go to the magic show? I have 2tickets.

    Boss: Sure, lets go.

    Boss Subordinate

  • 7/31/2019 Unit 3 Groups and Group Dynamics

    51/92

    Crossed transactionWhen the response do not originate from the ego-

    state in which it was received, it can be called as

    crossed transaction.

    P

    A

    C

    P

    A

    C

    Boss Subordinate

    Boss: Is the report ready?

    Subordinate: Do you thinkI have no other work to do?

  • 7/31/2019 Unit 3 Groups and Group Dynamics

    52/92

    Ulterior TransactionA message sent may have 2 targets (ego

    states). There may be an overt message

    (open and expressed), but it may alsocontain a covert message( a hidden one).

    Transactions with such messages are calledulterior transactions.

  • 7/31/2019 Unit 3 Groups and Group Dynamics

    53/92

    P

    A

    C

    P

    A

    C

    Boss: What is the date today?Overt message (A --- A): Asking the dateCovert Message (P ---C ): You are late again.

    Subordinate: Sir, I shall definitely send the report tomorrow.

    Boss Subordinate

  • 7/31/2019 Unit 3 Groups and Group Dynamics

    54/92

    Life Position Analysis

    1. Im OK, youre OK ------ Healthy position

    2. Im OK, youre not OK ------ Paranoid position3. Im not OK, youre OK ------ Depressive position

    4. Im not OK, youre not OK ------ SchizoidPosition

  • 7/31/2019 Unit 3 Groups and Group Dynamics

    55/92

    General transactional styles in the 4 life positions

    A

    Avoidant/Averse(Neglected child

    state)

    B

    Bossing (CriticalParent ego state)

    D

    Diffident

    (Child ego state)

    C

    Competent/Confident/

    Creative (Adult,

    nurturing parent and

    happy child ego state)

    Youre

    not OK

    YoureOK

    Im not OK Im OK

  • 7/31/2019 Unit 3 Groups and Group Dynamics

    56/92

    Stroking ??? Stroke refers to giving some kind of recognition to the

    other

    Types

    Positive strokes

    Negative strokes

    Mixed strokes

  • 7/31/2019 Unit 3 Groups and Group Dynamics

    57/92

    Games Analysis A game is a recurring set of transactions, often

    repetitions, superficially plausible, with aconcealed motivation or more colloquially, a series

    of moves with a share or gimmick.Eric Berne

    A psychological game is a set of transactions withthree characteristics A transaction tend to be repeated

    They make sense on superficial or social level

    One or more of the transactions is ulterior.

  • 7/31/2019 Unit 3 Groups and Group Dynamics

    58/92

    Continued Psychological games are played in the

    organizations because of the following reasons:

    To get strokes

    To strengthen life positions

    To avoid or control intimacy.

  • 7/31/2019 Unit 3 Groups and Group Dynamics

    59/92

    Types of games

    1st degree game socially acceptable

    2nd degree game a permanent remedialdamage arises, but the player would concealfrom the public.

    3rd degree ends in surgery, courtroom or themortuary.

  • 7/31/2019 Unit 3 Groups and Group Dynamics

    60/92

    Script Analysis All the world is a stage. And all the men and women

    merely players. They have their exits and their entrances.Each man in his time play many parts. ???????????

  • 7/31/2019 Unit 3 Groups and Group Dynamics

    61/92

    Script?A script is an ongoing programme, developed in

    early childhood under parental influence which

    directs the individual behavior in the mostimportant aspect of his life

  • 7/31/2019 Unit 3 Groups and Group Dynamics

    62/92

    Conflict

    f

  • 7/31/2019 Unit 3 Groups and Group Dynamics

    63/92

    Definition

    Conflict is any difference of opinion, disagreementor disequilibrium between

    one member and another member of an organization, one member and group, and between two groups

    Positives.. Provide opportunities for individuals to think and take

    concrete decisions Leads to innovation

    Brings cohesiveness Provides challenging work environment Indicates shortcomings in the system Device to overcome frustrations and tensions

  • 7/31/2019 Unit 3 Groups and Group Dynamics

    64/92

    Levels of Conflict Levels of conflict

    Intrapersonal Conflict

    Interpersonal Conflict

    Intragroup conflict Intergroup Conflict

    Constructive Escalate

    Destructive De-escalate

  • 7/31/2019 Unit 3 Groups and Group Dynamics

    65/92

    Managing conflict Preventive measures Development of effective leadership

    Development of effective participative decision making

    Development of effective 2 way communication Improvement in interpersonal relationship

    Provision of facilities

    Curative measures

  • 7/31/2019 Unit 3 Groups and Group Dynamics

    66/92

    Conflict Resolution Strategies

    Problem solving Most positive technique as it emphasizes on

    attaining the common interests of both conflictingparties.

    Avoidance Physical or mental withdrawal from the conflict -

    low concern for either partys outcomes and oftenresults in a lose-lose situation.

    SmoothingAccommodating the other partys interests

    emphasize more concern for others, resulting inlose-win situation

  • 7/31/2019 Unit 3 Groups and Group Dynamics

    67/92

    Continued Compromising

    Willing to give up something in exchange forgaining something else. Moderate degree of concernfor self and others. No clear-cut outcome.

    Confronting

    Working through a mutually satisfactory resolution.

    Maximizes the achievement of both partys goals,resulting in awin-win situation.

    Four possible outcomes of

  • 7/31/2019 Unit 3 Groups and Group Dynamics

    68/92

    1 2

    Lose-WinLose-Lose

    3

    Win-Lose

    4

    Win-win

    LOSE WIN

    WIN

    LOSE

    IndividualAsOutcome

    Individual Bs Outcome

    Four possible outcomes ofConflict;Four possible intentions of

    the participants.

  • 7/31/2019 Unit 3 Groups and Group Dynamics

    69/92

    Conflict Defined

    A process that begins when one party perceives that

    another party has negatively affected, or is about tonegatively affect, something that the first partycares about

    That point in an ongoing activity when aninteraction crosses over to become an interpartyconflict

  • 7/31/2019 Unit 3 Groups and Group Dynamics

    70/92

    Continued. Encompasses a wide range of conflicts that people

    experience in organizations

    Incompatibility of goals

    Differences over interpretations of facts

    Disagreements based on behavioral expectations

  • 7/31/2019 Unit 3 Groups and Group Dynamics

    71/92

    Transitions in Conflict Thought

    Traditional View of Conflict

    The belief that all conflict is harmful and must be avoided

    Prevalent view in the 1930s-1940s

    Conflict resulted from:

    Poor communication

    Lack of openness

    Failure to respond to employee needs

  • 7/31/2019 Unit 3 Groups and Group Dynamics

    72/92

    Continued..

    Human Relations View of Conflict

    The belief that conflict is a natural and inevitable outcome inany group

    Prevalent from the late 1940s through mid-1970s

    Interactionist View of Conflict

    The belief that conflict is not only a positive force in a group

    but that it is absolutely necessary for a group to performeffectively

    Current view

  • 7/31/2019 Unit 3 Groups and Group Dynamics

    73/92

    Forms of Interactionist Conflict

  • 7/31/2019 Unit 3 Groups and Group Dynamics

    74/92

    Types of Interactionist Conflict

    Task Conflict

    Conflicts over content and goals of the work

    Low-to-moderate levels of this type are FUNCTIONAL Relationship Conflict

    Conflict based on interpersonal relationships

    Almost always DYSFUNCTIONAL

    Process Conflict Conflict over how work gets done

    Low levels of this type are FUNCTIONAL

  • 7/31/2019 Unit 3 Groups and Group Dynamics

    75/92

    Levels of Conflict?

    Levels of conflict

    Intrapersonal Conflict

    Interpersonal Conflict Interorganizational conflict

    Intergroup Conflict

    Constructive Escalate

    Destructive De-escalate

  • 7/31/2019 Unit 3 Groups and Group Dynamics

    76/92

    Effects of Conflict

    Advantages People are stimulated to search for improved approaches that lead

    to better results. Energizes them to be more creative and to experiment with new

    ideas. If conflict is resolved, individuals will be more committed to the

    outcome.

    Disadvantages If conflict lasts for a long period of time, it becomes too intense

    and personalized. At the interpersonal level, cooperation and teamwork may

    deteriorate. At the individual level, some people may feel defeated, stress level

    will rise, become demotivated and there will be decline in self-image

  • 7/31/2019 Unit 3 Groups and Group Dynamics

    77/92

    The Conflict ProcessWe will focus on each step in a moment

  • 7/31/2019 Unit 3 Groups and Group Dynamics

    78/92

    Stage I: Potential Opposition or Incompatibility

    Communication Semantic difficulties, misunderstandings, and noise

    Structure Size and specialization of jobs

    Jurisdictional clarity/ambiguity

    Member/goal incompatibility

    Leadership styles (close or participative)

    Reward systems (win-lose)

    Dependence/interdependence of groups

    Personal Variables Differing individual value systems

    Personality types

  • 7/31/2019 Unit 3 Groups and Group Dynamics

    79/92

    Stage II: Cognition and Personalization

    Important stage for two reasons:

    1. Conflict is defined

    Perceived Conflict

    Awareness by one or more parties of the existence ofconditions that create opportunities for conflict to arise

    2. Emotions are expressed that have a strong impact onthe eventual outcome

    Felt Conflict

    Emotional involvement in a conflict creating anxiety,tenseness, frustration, or hostility

  • 7/31/2019 Unit 3 Groups and Group Dynamics

    80/92

    Stage III: Intentions

    Intentions

    Decisions to act in a given way Note: behavior does not always accurate reflect intent

    Dimensions of conflict-handling intentions: Cooperativeness

    Attempting to satisfythe other partysconcerns

    Assertiveness Attempting to satisfy

    ones own concerns

  • 7/31/2019 Unit 3 Groups and Group Dynamics

    81/92

    Stage IV: Behavior Conflict Management

    The use of resolution and stimulation techniques toachieve the desired level of conflict

    Conflict-Intensity Continuum

  • 7/31/2019 Unit 3 Groups and Group Dynamics

    82/92

    Conflict Resolution Techniques

    Problem solving

    Super ordinate goals Expansion of resources

    Avoidance

    Smoothing

    Compromise Authoritative command

    Altering the humanvariable

    Altering the structuralvariables

    Communication

    Bringing in outsiders

    Restructuring theorganization

    Appointing a devilsadvocate

  • 7/31/2019 Unit 3 Groups and Group Dynamics

    83/92

    Stage V: Outcomes

    Functional Increased group performance

    Improved quality of decisions

    Stimulation of creativity andinnovation

    Encouragement of interestand curiosity

    Provision of a medium forproblem-solving

    Creation of an environmentfor self-evaluation and change

    Dysfunctional Development of discontent

    Reduced group effectiveness

    Retarded communication

    Reduced group cohesiveness Infighting among group

    members overcomes groupgoals

    Creating Functional

    Conflict Reward dissent and punish

    conflict avoiders

  • 7/31/2019 Unit 3 Groups and Group Dynamics

    84/92

    Indirect conflict management approaches Reduced interdependence

    Decoupling

    Buffering

    Linking pin roles

    Appeals to common goals

    Hierarchical referral

    Altering scripts and myths

    Direct Conflict management approaches

  • 7/31/2019 Unit 3 Groups and Group Dynamics

    85/92

    Avoiding

    Physical or mental withdrawal from the conflict - low concern foreither partys outcomes and often results in a lose-lose situation.

    Smoothing Accommodating the other partys interests emphasize more

    concern for others, resulting in lose-win situation

    Forcing Using power tactics to achieve a win. Relies on aggressiveness and

    dominance to achieve personal goals at the expense of other party.Results in awin-lose situation.

    Compromising Willing to give up something in exchange for gaining something

    else. Moderate degree of concern for self and others. No clear-cutoutcome.

    Confronting Working through a mutually satisfactory resolution. Maximizes the

    achievement of both partys goals, resulting in awin-win situation.

    Four possible outcomes of

  • 7/31/2019 Unit 3 Groups and Group Dynamics

    86/92

    1 2

    Lose-WinLose-Lose

    3

    Win-Lose

    4

    Win-win

    LOSE WIN

    WIN

    LOSE

    IndividualAsOutcome

    Individual Bs Outcome

    Conflict;Four possible intentions of

    the participants.

  • 7/31/2019 Unit 3 Groups and Group Dynamics

    87/92

    Employee counseling Counseling is a discussion with an employee of aproblem that usually has emotional content in order tohelp the employee cope with it better.

    It is an exchange of ideas and feelings between twopeople, nominally a counselor and a counselee.

    Need for counseling

  • 7/31/2019 Unit 3 Groups and Group Dynamics

    88/92

    What can counseling do? Advice Telling a person what you think should be done; coaching

    Reassurance

    Giving people courage and confidence that they are capable offacing a problem

    Communication

    Providing information and understanding

  • 7/31/2019 Unit 3 Groups and Group Dynamics

    89/92

    Continued Release of emotional tension Helping a person feel more free of frustrations and stress

    Clarified thinking

    Encouraging more coherent, rational and mature thought Reorientation

    Encouraging an internal change in goals, values and mentalmodels

  • 7/31/2019 Unit 3 Groups and Group Dynamics

    90/92

    Types of counseling

    Non-directive

    counseling

    Participative

    counseling

    Directive

    counseling

    No directionFull direction

  • 7/31/2019 Unit 3 Groups and Group Dynamics

    91/92

    Difference between directive and non-directive

    counseling

    Non-directive counseling Directive counseling

    Counseling method

    Employee primarily controls

    the direction of theconversation and does mostof the talking

    Responsibility for solution

    Employee

    Counselor primarily controls

    the direction of theconversation and does mostof the talking

    Counselor

  • 7/31/2019 Unit 3 Groups and Group Dynamics

    92/92

    ContinuedNon-directive counseling Directive counseling Status of participants

    Employee and counselor areon an equal level

    Role of participants Employee is psychologically

    independent

    Emphasis placed Psychological adjustment is

    paramount, with deep feelingsand emotional problemsaccented

    The counselor is at least

    implicitly superior to theemployee

    Employee is psychologicallydependent on the counselor

    Solution of current problemsis emphasized, with feelingsand emotions often ignored