UnderstandingtheImpactofNetworkInfrastructureChanges ...Contributions IPv6Performance Failures...
Transcript of UnderstandingtheImpactofNetworkInfrastructureChanges ...Contributions IPv6Performance Failures...
![Page 1: UnderstandingtheImpactofNetworkInfrastructureChanges ...Contributions IPv6Performance Failures Latency YouTube HappyEyeballs Last-mileLatency Thanks! Q/A UnderstandingtheImpactofNetworkInfrastructureChanges](https://reader033.fdocuments.us/reader033/viewer/2022050313/5f75659447af54590375cd30/html5/thumbnails/1.jpg)
Contributions
IPv6 PerformanceFailures
Latency
YouTube
Happy Eyeballs
Last-mile Latency
Thanks!
Q/A
Understanding the Impact of Network Infrastructure Changesusing Large Scale Measurement Platforms
Vaibhav BajpaiTU Munich
IM 2017 ConferenceLisbon, Portugal
Dissertation Committee
Jürgen SchönwälderJacobs University Bremen, Germany
Kinga LipskochJacobs University Bremen, Germany
Filip De TurckUniversity of Ghent, Belgium
May 2017
1 / 19
![Page 2: UnderstandingtheImpactofNetworkInfrastructureChanges ...Contributions IPv6Performance Failures Latency YouTube HappyEyeballs Last-mileLatency Thanks! Q/A UnderstandingtheImpactofNetworkInfrastructureChanges](https://reader033.fdocuments.us/reader033/viewer/2022050313/5f75659447af54590375cd30/html5/thumbnails/2.jpg)
Contributions
IPv6 PerformanceFailures
Latency
YouTube
Happy Eyeballs
Last-mile Latency
Thanks!
Q/A
Survey on Internet Performance Measurement Platforms [1] [COMST ′15]
Measuring IPv6 Performance
▶ Measuring Web Similarity [2] [CNSM ′16]
▶ Measuring TCP Connect Times [3] [NETWORKING ′15]
▶ Measuring YouTube Performance [4] [PAM ′15]
▶ Measuring Effects of Happy Eyeballs [5] [ANRW ′16]
Measuring Access Network Performance
▶ RIPE Atlas Vantage Point Selection [6] [IM ′17]
▶ Dissecting Last-mile Latency Characteristics [∗]
▶ Lessons Learned from using RIPE Atlas [7] [SIGCOMM CCR ′15]
* entries are papers currently under review.
2 / 19
![Page 3: UnderstandingtheImpactofNetworkInfrastructureChanges ...Contributions IPv6Performance Failures Latency YouTube HappyEyeballs Last-mileLatency Thanks! Q/A UnderstandingtheImpactofNetworkInfrastructureChanges](https://reader033.fdocuments.us/reader033/viewer/2022050313/5f75659447af54590375cd30/html5/thumbnails/3.jpg)
Contributions
IPv6 PerformanceFailures
Latency
YouTube
Happy Eyeballs
Last-mile Latency
Thanks!
Q/A
IPv6 Performance
▶ Literature focus largely on IPv6 adoption.
▶ Very little work on measuring IPv6 performance.
▶ This study closes the gap. 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 20170%5%10%15%
Google IPv6 Adoption
shaded region represents the duration of the longitudinal study.
We measure from ∼100 dual-stacked SamKnows probes.
NETWORK TYPE #
RESIDENTIAL 78
NREN / RESEARCH 10
BUSINESS / DATACENTER 08
OPERATOR LAB 04
IXP 01
RIR #
RIPE 60
ARIN 29
APNIC 10
AFRINIC 01
LACNIC 01
3 / 19
![Page 4: UnderstandingtheImpactofNetworkInfrastructureChanges ...Contributions IPv6Performance Failures Latency YouTube HappyEyeballs Last-mileLatency Thanks! Q/A UnderstandingtheImpactofNetworkInfrastructureChanges](https://reader033.fdocuments.us/reader033/viewer/2022050313/5f75659447af54590375cd30/html5/thumbnails/4.jpg)
Contributions
IPv6 PerformanceFailures
Latency
YouTube
Happy Eyeballs
Last-mile Latency
Thanks!
Q/A
Complete Failures
2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 20170.0%10.0%20.0%30.0%40.0%50.0%
W6D
W6LD
ALEXA 1M with AAAA entries
HTTP Failure
▶ Failures reduced from 40% (2009) to 3% today.
0.1K 1K 10K 100K 1000KALEXA Rank
0.00.20.40.60.81.0
CDF
Failing AAAA Websites
4.3K[M
ar '
17]
▶ 88% failing websites rank > 100K.
▶ 1% rank < 10K, six websites rank < 300.
100101102103
www.bing.com
102
103www.detik.com
100101102103
www.engadget.com
102
103www.nifty.com
100101102103104
www.qq.com
Jan2013
Jan2014
Jan2015
Jan2016
Jul Jul Jul102
103www.sakura.ne.jp
IPv6 IPv4
TCP Connect Times (ms)
Metrics should account for changes in IPv6-readiness.
4 / 19
![Page 5: UnderstandingtheImpactofNetworkInfrastructureChanges ...Contributions IPv6Performance Failures Latency YouTube HappyEyeballs Last-mileLatency Thanks! Q/A UnderstandingtheImpactofNetworkInfrastructureChanges](https://reader033.fdocuments.us/reader033/viewer/2022050313/5f75659447af54590375cd30/html5/thumbnails/5.jpg)
Contributions
IPv6 PerformanceFailures
Latency
YouTube
Happy Eyeballs
Last-mile Latency
Thanks!
Q/A
Partial FailuresALEXA top 100 websites with AAAA entries.
▶ 27% show some rate of failure over IPv6.
▶ 9% exhibit more than 50% failures over IPv6.
0 20 40 60 80 100Success Rate (%)
0.00.20.40.60.81.0
CDF
IPv6 (100)IPv4 (100)
▶ Limiting to root webpage can lead tooverestimation of IPv6 adoption numbers
▶ Unclear whether websites with partialfailures can be deemed IPv6-ready
▶ ISOC now supporting [8] development oftools that identify such partial failures
# Webpage Success Rate (%) W6LDIPv6(↓) IPv4
01 www.bing.com 0 100 302 www.detik.com 0 100 303 www.engadget.com 0 100 304 www.nifty.com 0 100
05 www.qq.com 0 100
06 www.sakura.ne.jp 0 100
07 www.flipkart.com 09 99 308 www.folha.uol.com.br 13 100
09 www.aol.com 48 100 3
10 www.comcast.net 52 100 311 www.yahoo.com 72 100 312 www.mozilla.org 84 100 313 www.orange.fr 86 100 314 www.seznam.cz 89 100 315 www.mobile.de 90 100 316 www.wikimedia.org 90 100
17 www.t-online.de 93 100 318 www.free.fr 95 100
19 www.usps.com 95 100
20 www.vk.com 95 100 321 www.wikipedia.org 95 100 322 www.wiktionary.org 95 100
23 www.elmundo.es 96 100 324 www.uol.com.br 96 100 325 www.marca.com 97 100 326 www.terra.com.br 98 100 327 www.youm7.com 99 100
5 / 19
![Page 6: UnderstandingtheImpactofNetworkInfrastructureChanges ...Contributions IPv6Performance Failures Latency YouTube HappyEyeballs Last-mileLatency Thanks! Q/A UnderstandingtheImpactofNetworkInfrastructureChanges](https://reader033.fdocuments.us/reader033/viewer/2022050313/5f75659447af54590375cd30/html5/thumbnails/6.jpg)
Contributions
IPv6 PerformanceFailures
Latency
YouTube
Happy Eyeballs
Last-mile Latency
Thanks!
Q/A
Partial Failures | Root Cause Analysis
0 30 60 90www.youm7.com (1%)
www.terra.com.br (2%)www.marca.com (3%)www.uol.com.br (4%)www.elmundo.es (4%)
www.wiktionary.org (5%)www.wikipedia.org (5%)
www.vk.com (5%)www.usps.com (5%)www.free.fr (5%)
www.t-online.de (7%)www.wikimedia.org (10%)
www.mobile.de (10%)www.seznam.cz (11%)www.orange.fr (14%)
www.mozilla.org (16%)www.yahoo.com (28%)
www.comcast.net (48%)www.aol.com (52%)
www.folha.uol.com.br (87%)www.flipkart.com (91%)www.sakura.ne.jp (100%)
www.qq.com (100%)www.nifty.com (100%)
www.engadget.com (100%)www.detik.com (100%)www.bing.com (100%)
Network LevelCURLE_OKCURLE_COULDNT_RESOLVE_HOSTCURLE_COULDNT_CONNECTCURLE_OPERATION_TIMEDOUTCURLE_GOT_NOTHINGCURLE_RECV_ERROR
0 30 60 90Contribution (%)
Content Level
*/css*/html*/javascript, */json*/octet-stream*/plain*/rdf*/xmlimage/*
0 30 60 90
Service Level
SAME ORIGINCROSS ORIGIN
Website failing over IPv6
▶ Failures silently exist; clients do notnotice them due to IPv4 fallback.
▶ Identification of operational issuesrelevant for upcoming IPv6-onlynetworks
▶ Failures due to DNS resolution error on image/*, */javascript, */json and */css content.
▶ 12% websites have more than 50% content that belongs to same-origin source and fails over IPv6,
▶ Content failing from cross-origin sources consists of analytics and third-party advertisements.
6 / 19
![Page 7: UnderstandingtheImpactofNetworkInfrastructureChanges ...Contributions IPv6Performance Failures Latency YouTube HappyEyeballs Last-mileLatency Thanks! Q/A UnderstandingtheImpactofNetworkInfrastructureChanges](https://reader033.fdocuments.us/reader033/viewer/2022050313/5f75659447af54590375cd30/html5/thumbnails/7.jpg)
Contributions
IPv6 PerformanceFailures
Latency
YouTube
Happy Eyeballs
Last-mile Latency
Thanks!
Q/A
Latency | Websites
∆sa(u) = t4(u) − t6(u)
where t(u) is the time taken to establish TCP connection to website u.
▶ ISPs in early stages of IPv6 deployment shouldensure their CDN caches are dual-stacked.
−150−100−50050
TCP Connect Times [∆sa (ms)]
www.bing.comwww.facebook.com
www.wikipedia.orgwww.youtube.com
2013 2014 2015 2016 2017−60−40−20020
www.blogspot.*www.google.*
www.netflix.comwww.yahoo.com
▶ TCP connect times to popular websites over IPv6 have considerably improved over time.
▶ Inflated latency over IPv6 was due to missing content caches over IPv6
7 / 19
![Page 8: UnderstandingtheImpactofNetworkInfrastructureChanges ...Contributions IPv6Performance Failures Latency YouTube HappyEyeballs Last-mileLatency Thanks! Q/A UnderstandingtheImpactofNetworkInfrastructureChanges](https://reader033.fdocuments.us/reader033/viewer/2022050313/5f75659447af54590375cd30/html5/thumbnails/8.jpg)
Contributions
IPv6 PerformanceFailures
Latency
YouTube
Happy Eyeballs
Last-mile Latency
Thanks!
Q/A
Latency | Websites - Who connects faster?
ALEXA top 10K websites (as of Jan 2017):
▶ 40% are faster over IPv6.
▶ 94% of the rest are at most 1 ms slower.
▶ 3% are at least 10 ms slower.
▶ 1% are at least 100 ms slower. −1.0 −0.5 0.0 0.5 1.0∆sa (ms)
0.0
0.2
0.4
0.6
0.8
1.0
CDF
netflixyahoo
linkedinmicrosoft facebook
wikipedia
cloudflare heise
openstreetmap
ALEXA (10K)
[01/
2017
]
∆sa(u) = t4(u) − t6(u)
▶ Relevant for content providers to get insights on how their service delivery compares over IPv6.
8 / 19
![Page 9: UnderstandingtheImpactofNetworkInfrastructureChanges ...Contributions IPv6Performance Failures Latency YouTube HappyEyeballs Last-mileLatency Thanks! Q/A UnderstandingtheImpactofNetworkInfrastructureChanges](https://reader033.fdocuments.us/reader033/viewer/2022050313/5f75659447af54590375cd30/html5/thumbnails/9.jpg)
Contributions
IPv6 PerformanceFailures
Latency
YouTube
Happy Eyeballs
Last-mile Latency
Thanks!
Q/A
YouTube
Latency is consistently higher over IPv6.
▶ TCP connect times
▶ < 1 ms slower over IPv6▶ Higher towards webpages
▶ Prebuffering durations
▶ > 25 ms slower over IPv6
▶ Startup delay
▶ > 100 ms slower over IPv6
▶ ISPs should make their GGC nodes dual-stacked.
−5−4−3−2−10
∆t (ms)
TCP Connect Times
Web
−0.4−0.3−0.2−0.10.0
∆t (ms)
TCP Connect Times
AudioVideo
−120−80−400
∆p (ms)
Prebuffering Duration
Oct Jan2015
Apr Jul Oct Jan2016
Apr−400−300−200−100
0
∆s (ms)
Startup Delay
∆t(y) = tc4(y) − tc6(y)∆p(y) = pd4(y) − pd6(y)∆s(y) = sd4(y) − sd6(y)
9 / 19
![Page 10: UnderstandingtheImpactofNetworkInfrastructureChanges ...Contributions IPv6Performance Failures Latency YouTube HappyEyeballs Last-mileLatency Thanks! Q/A UnderstandingtheImpactofNetworkInfrastructureChanges](https://reader033.fdocuments.us/reader033/viewer/2022050313/5f75659447af54590375cd30/html5/thumbnails/10.jpg)
Contributions
IPv6 PerformanceFailures
Latency
YouTube
Happy Eyeballs
Last-mile Latency
Thanks!
Q/A
Happy Eyeballs
▶ Only ∼1% of samples aboveHE timer value > 300 ms
Samples where HE prefers IPv6 −
▶ HE prefers slower IPv6connections 90% of the time.
▶ HE timer of 150 ms maintainssame IPv6 preference levels.
10-2 10-1 100 101 102 103 104TCP Connect Times (ms)
0.00.20.40.60.81.0
CDF
300
ms
IPv6 (462K)IPv4 (462K)
['13
- '
17]
−40 −30 −20 −10 0 10∆sa (ms)
0.00.20.40.60.81.0
CDF
1% 2% 7%30%
93%99%
462K
['13
- '
17]
▶ RFC 6555 should have used 150 ms timer. Measurements should inform protocol engineering.▶ Drive an RFC 6555 update with operational experience within the IETF.
10 / 19
![Page 11: UnderstandingtheImpactofNetworkInfrastructureChanges ...Contributions IPv6Performance Failures Latency YouTube HappyEyeballs Last-mileLatency Thanks! Q/A UnderstandingtheImpactofNetworkInfrastructureChanges](https://reader033.fdocuments.us/reader033/viewer/2022050313/5f75659447af54590375cd30/html5/thumbnails/11.jpg)
Contributions
IPv6 PerformanceFailures
Latency
YouTube
Happy Eyeballs
Last-mile Latency
Thanks!
Q/A
Survey on Internet Performance Measurement Platforms [COMST ′15]
Measuring IPv6 Performance
▶ Measuring Web Similarity [CNSM ′16]
▶ Measuring TCP Connect Times [NETWORKING ′15]
▶ Measuring YouTube Performance [PAM ′15]
▶ Measuring Effects of Happy Eyeballs [ANRW ′16]
Measuring Access Network Performance
▶ RIPE Atlas Vantage Point Selection [IM ′17]
▶ Dissecting Last-mile Latency Characteristics [∗]
▶ Lessons Learned from using RIPE Atlas [SIGCOMM CCR ′15]
* entries are papers currently under review.
11 / 19
![Page 12: UnderstandingtheImpactofNetworkInfrastructureChanges ...Contributions IPv6Performance Failures Latency YouTube HappyEyeballs Last-mileLatency Thanks! Q/A UnderstandingtheImpactofNetworkInfrastructureChanges](https://reader033.fdocuments.us/reader033/viewer/2022050313/5f75659447af54590375cd30/html5/thumbnails/12.jpg)
Contributions
IPv6 PerformanceFailures
Latency
YouTube
Happy Eyeballs
Last-mile Latency
Thanks!
Q/A
Last-mile Latency
▶ Latency becomes a critical factor [9] when downstream throughput > 16 Mb/s.▶ Last-mile latency is a major contributor[9] to end-to-end latency.▶ However, little is known [10, 11] about characteristics of last-mile latency.
▶ 696 RIPE Atlas v3 residential probes (blue)
▶ 1245 SamKnows residential probes (red)
Methodology described to isolate residential probes useful forfuture broadband measurement studies using these platforms.
12 / 19
![Page 13: UnderstandingtheImpactofNetworkInfrastructureChanges ...Contributions IPv6Performance Failures Latency YouTube HappyEyeballs Last-mileLatency Thanks! Q/A UnderstandingtheImpactofNetworkInfrastructureChanges](https://reader033.fdocuments.us/reader033/viewer/2022050313/5f75659447af54590375cd30/html5/thumbnails/13.jpg)
Contributions
IPv6 PerformanceFailures
Latency
YouTube
Happy Eyeballs
Last-mile Latency
Thanks!
Q/A
Last-mile Latency | Home Network Latency
The home network should not be accounted when measuring last-mile latency.
10-1 100 101 102 103 104hop1/hop2 (%)
0.00.20.40.60.81.0
CDF
Residential Probes
SamKnows (1.1K)RIPE Atlas (0.6K)
▶ hop1 > 10% of hop2 latency (∼19% probes).
Last-mile latency should be the difference between the hop2 and hop1 latency.13 / 19
![Page 14: UnderstandingtheImpactofNetworkInfrastructureChanges ...Contributions IPv6Performance Failures Latency YouTube HappyEyeballs Last-mileLatency Thanks! Q/A UnderstandingtheImpactofNetworkInfrastructureChanges](https://reader033.fdocuments.us/reader033/viewer/2022050313/5f75659447af54590375cd30/html5/thumbnails/14.jpg)
Contributions
IPv6 PerformanceFailures
Latency
YouTube
Happy Eyeballs
Last-mile Latency
Thanks!
Q/A
Last-mile Latency | Interleaving Depths
▶ DSL networks not only enable interleaving [11] but …▶ …also employ multiple interleaving depth levels that change with time.
1 4 16 640.20.61.0
CDF
FREE
1 4 16 64
FREE
1 4 16 64
PLUSNET
1 4 16 64
TISCALI
29/ 12/ 26/141664
RTT (ms)
29/ 12/ 26/ 05/ 19/ 29/ 12/ 26/
hop1 hop2
▶ Interleaving depths show a step-wise functional change.▶ hop2 latency transitions correlate with corresponding timeseries.
14 / 19
![Page 15: UnderstandingtheImpactofNetworkInfrastructureChanges ...Contributions IPv6Performance Failures Latency YouTube HappyEyeballs Last-mileLatency Thanks! Q/A UnderstandingtheImpactofNetworkInfrastructureChanges](https://reader033.fdocuments.us/reader033/viewer/2022050313/5f75659447af54590375cd30/html5/thumbnails/15.jpg)
Contributions
IPv6 PerformanceFailures
Latency
YouTube
Happy Eyeballs
Last-mile Latency
Thanks!
Q/A
Last-mile Latency | Time of Day Effects
▶ Last-mile latencies are stable over time.
▶ Last-mile latencies do not exhibit diurnal load patterns.
▶ Simulation studies can now accurately model access links.
▶ CDN providers benefit from characteristics of the last-mile.
▶ Promotes ISPs to cache popular content close to the CPE.
01h05h09h13h17h21h
[35
days
]
01h05h09h13h17h21h
[35
days
]
1 2 4 8 163264Last-mile latency (ms)
01h05h09h13h17h21h
[35
days
]
424424425426425425
[# P
robe
s]
DSL (RIPE Atlas)
223223223223223223
[# P
robe
s]
CABLE (RIPE Atlas)
363636363636
[# P
robe
s]
FIBRE (RIPE Atlas)
15 / 19
![Page 16: UnderstandingtheImpactofNetworkInfrastructureChanges ...Contributions IPv6Performance Failures Latency YouTube HappyEyeballs Last-mileLatency Thanks! Q/A UnderstandingtheImpactofNetworkInfrastructureChanges](https://reader033.fdocuments.us/reader033/viewer/2022050313/5f75659447af54590375cd30/html5/thumbnails/16.jpg)
Contributions
IPv6 PerformanceFailures
Latency
YouTube
Happy Eyeballs
Last-mile Latency
Thanks!
Q/A
Last-mile Latency | Subscriber Location
▶ Not all cable deployments [10, 11] show last-mile latencies < DSL.
1 2 4 8 16 32 64Last-mile latency (ms)
0.00.20.40.60.81.0
CDF (84 probes) COMCAST (RIPE Atlas)
EST (44)PST (40)
▶ Last-mile latencies:
▶ can depend on geographic location of the subscriber.▶ are considerably different along US east (∼32 ms) and west (∼8 ms) coast.
16 / 19
![Page 17: UnderstandingtheImpactofNetworkInfrastructureChanges ...Contributions IPv6Performance Failures Latency YouTube HappyEyeballs Last-mileLatency Thanks! Q/A UnderstandingtheImpactofNetworkInfrastructureChanges](https://reader033.fdocuments.us/reader033/viewer/2022050313/5f75659447af54590375cd30/html5/thumbnails/17.jpg)
Contributions
IPv6 PerformanceFailures
Latency
YouTube
Happy Eyeballs
Last-mile Latency
Thanks!
Q/A
Last-mile Latency | Broadband Speeds
Last-mile latencies vary by broadband speeds.
20 21 22 23 24 25 26Last-mile latency (ms)
0.00.20.40.60.81.0
CDF
(306
)
BT (SamKnows)80 Mbps (100)40 Mbps (37)20 Mbps (88)8 Mbps (81) ▶ Input for future standards (QUIC, TLS 1.3) work
that targets operation in 0-RTT mode.
▶ ADSL2+ and VDSL with higher transmission rates help reduce interleaving delays.
▶ Last-mile latencies for VDSL < ADSL/ADSL2+
17 / 19
![Page 18: UnderstandingtheImpactofNetworkInfrastructureChanges ...Contributions IPv6Performance Failures Latency YouTube HappyEyeballs Last-mileLatency Thanks! Q/A UnderstandingtheImpactofNetworkInfrastructureChanges](https://reader033.fdocuments.us/reader033/viewer/2022050313/5f75659447af54590375cd30/html5/thumbnails/18.jpg)
Contributions
IPv6 PerformanceFailures
Latency
YouTube
Happy Eyeballs
Last-mile Latency
Thanks!
Q/A
This thesis would not have been possible without these amazing people!
12
Sam Crawford
• SamKnows Ltd WP1 leader, Leone Project
• Working on / interested in: – Large scale active measurements, mainly fixed-line,
but also mobile now – Better cross-traffic identification – Integration into existing CPE – LMAP architecture and practical implementations – New metrics (mainly for testing compatibility/viability)
• What’s missing: Many things, but in-home measurements in particular
18 / 19
![Page 19: UnderstandingtheImpactofNetworkInfrastructureChanges ...Contributions IPv6Performance Failures Latency YouTube HappyEyeballs Last-mileLatency Thanks! Q/A UnderstandingtheImpactofNetworkInfrastructureChanges](https://reader033.fdocuments.us/reader033/viewer/2022050313/5f75659447af54590375cd30/html5/thumbnails/19.jpg)
Contributions
IPv6 PerformanceFailures
Latency
YouTube
Happy Eyeballs
Last-mile Latency
Thanks!
Q/A
1. Survey on Internet Performance Measurement Platforms [COMST ′15]
2. Measuring IPv6 Performance
▶ Measuring Web Similarity [CNSM ′16]
▶ Measuring TCP Connect Times [NETWORKING ′15]
▶ Measuring YouTube Performance [PAM ′15]
▶ Measuring Effects of Happy Eyeballs [ANRW ′16]
3. Measuring Access Network Performance
▶ RIPE Atlas Vantage Point Selection [IM ′17]
▶ Dissecting Last-mile Latency Characteristics [∗]
▶ Lessons Learned from using RIPE Atlas [SIGCOMM CCR ′15]
www.vaibhavbajpai.com
[email protected] | @bajpaivaibhav
19 / 19
![Page 20: UnderstandingtheImpactofNetworkInfrastructureChanges ...Contributions IPv6Performance Failures Latency YouTube HappyEyeballs Last-mileLatency Thanks! Q/A UnderstandingtheImpactofNetworkInfrastructureChanges](https://reader033.fdocuments.us/reader033/viewer/2022050313/5f75659447af54590375cd30/html5/thumbnails/20.jpg)
Contributions
IPv6 PerformanceFailures
Latency
YouTube
Happy Eyeballs
Last-mile Latency
Thanks!
Q/A
References[1] V. Bajpai and J. Schönwälder, “A Survey on Internet Performance
Measurement Platforms and Related Standardization Efforts,” ser.IEEE Communications Surveys and Tutorials, 2015. [Online].Available: http://dx.doi.org/10.1109/COMST.2015.2418435
[2] S. J. Eravuchira, V. Bajpai, J. Schönwälder, and S. Crawford,“Measuring Web Similarity from Dual-stacked Hosts,” ser.Conference on Network and Service Management, 2016, pp. 181–187.[Online]. Available: http://dx.doi.org/10.1109/CNSM.2016.7818415
[3] V. Bajpai and J. Schönwälder, “IPv4 versus IPv6 - who connectsfaster?” ser. IFIP Networking Conference, 2015, pp. 1–9. [Online].Available: http://dx.doi.org/10.1109/IFIPNetworking.2015.7145323
[4] S. Ahsan, V. Bajpai, J. Ott, and J. Schönwälder, “Measuring YouTubefrom Dual-Stacked Hosts,” ser. Passive and Active MeasurementConference, 2015, pp. 249–261. [Online]. Available:http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-15509-8_19
[5] V. Bajpai and J. Schönwälder, “Measuring the Effects of HappyEyeballs,” ser. Applied Networking Research Workshop, 2016.[Online]. Available: http://dl.acm.org/citation.cfm?id=2959429
[6] V. Bajpai, S. J. Eravuchira, J. Schönwälder, R. Kisteleki, and E. Aben,“Vantage Point Selection for IPv6 Measurements: Benefits and
Limitations of RIPE Atlas Tags,” ser. International Symposium onIntegrated Network Management (IM), 2017 (to appear).
[7] V. Bajpai, S. J. Eravuchira, and J. Schönwälder, “Lessons LearnedFrom Using the RIPE Atlas Platform for Measurement Research,” ser.Computer Communication Review, vol. 45, no. 3, 2015, pp. 35–42.[Online]. Available: http://doi.acm.org/10.1145/2805789.2805796
[8] “NAT64 Check,” nat64check.ipv6-lab.net, [Accessed 15-Apr-2017].
[9] S. Sundaresan, N. Feamster, R. Teixeira, and N. Magharei, “Measuringand Mitigating Web Performance Bottlenecks in Broadband AccessNetworks,” ser. IMC, 2013. [Online]. Available:http://doi.acm.org/10.1145/2504730.2504741
[10] M. Dischinger, A. Haeberlen, P. K. Gummadi, and S. Saroiu,“Characterizing Residential Broadband Networks,” ser. InternetMeasurement Conference, 2007, pp. 43–56. [Online]. Available:http://doi.acm.org/10.1145/1298306.1298313
[11] S. Sundaresan, W. de Donato, N. Feamster, R. Teixeira, S. Crawford,and A. Pescapè, “Broadband Internet Performance: A View From theGateway,” ser. SIGCOMM, 2011, pp. 134–145. [Online]. Available:http://doi.acm.org/10.1145/2018436.2018452
19 / 19