Understanding the Sustainable Consumer: Lessons Learned ... · Segmentation reflects the intensity...
Transcript of Understanding the Sustainable Consumer: Lessons Learned ... · Segmentation reflects the intensity...
Understanding the Sustainable Consumer: Lessons Learned and Upcoming Research in 2013
Presented by Laurie Demeritt, CEO, The Hartman Group
2 Understanding the Sustainable Consumer: Lessons Learned and Upcoming Research in 2013 © 2013 The Hartman Group, Inc
Today’s Topics
Review Topline Findings from Past Hartman Group Sustainability Research
• Participation in the World of Sustainability
• Consumer Attitudes Toward Sustainability
• Sustainable Purchasing and Products
• Communicating Sustainability
Preview 2013 Sustainability Study: When Personal Aspirations and Behavior
Diverge
3 Understanding the Sustainable Consumer: Lessons Learned and Upcoming Research in 2013 © 2013 The Hartman Group, Inc
Sustainability Study 2010: Methodology Overview
Qualitative Research
• In-depth ethnographic interviews in consumer homes and in stores
• Field locations
» Seattle, Chicago, Charlotte, and Dallas
Quantitative National Survey
• Custom online survey of 1,982 adult US consumers fielded in August 2010
A Consumer-Centric Approach
• Our research methods give consumers great freedom to define sustainability objectively and broadly
Participation in The World of Sustainability 01
5 Understanding the Sustainable Consumer: Lessons Learned and Upcoming Research in 2013 © 2013 The Hartman Group, Inc
13%
35%
31%
21%
World of Sustainability | 89% of US consumers participate
Segmentation reflects the intensity of consumer involvement in the World of Sustainability
Segmentation is based on respondent behavior regarding: animal testing, packaging, community issues, supporting companies helping the local
community, recycling, and price. Base: n=1982.
6 Understanding the Sustainable Consumer: Lessons Learned and Upcoming Research in 2013 © 2013 The Hartman Group, Inc
The world of sustainability | Purchase criteria varies according to consumer segment
7 Understanding the Sustainable Consumer: Lessons Learned and Upcoming Research in 2013 © 2013 The Hartman Group, Inc
Some personal benefit must be served before larger sustainable concerns are considered by consumers
Personal Benefit Zone
Social Zone
Environmental Zone Economic Zone
Sustainability is now conventionally expressed in terms of the environmental, social and economic impacts (the “three pillars”) that result from human action.
We also add a fourth zone of sustainability, personal benefit, because it is particularly helpful in explaining sustainability from the consumer viewpoint – especially in terms of an entry point.
8 Understanding the Sustainable Consumer: Lessons Learned and Upcoming Research in 2013 © 2013 The Hartman Group, Inc
For consumers, sustainability is initially tied to perceptions of risk mitigation and health
The majority of consumers first enter the world of sustainability through the personal safety/health dimension of the personal benefit zone (concern for things in, on and around the body).
Personal health benefits typically are expressed in sustainable products as a lack of negative/ toxic ingredients whether in food, personal care or household products.
• So, recognizable ingredients that can be found in the average consumer’s kitchen (whether food product or not), such as citrus, vinegar and baking soda, cue that a product is benign
• Other cues such as a short ingredient list and recognizable ingredients also help
What goes
in my body What goes on
my body What’s around
my body
What’s beyond
my body?
9 Understanding the Sustainable Consumer: Lessons Learned and Upcoming Research in 2013 © 2013 The Hartman Group, Inc
Consumer notions of sustainability involve certain dimensions of responsibility for each zone
Social Zone
1. Employment practices
2. Community involvement/local
3. Fair trade
4. Animal welfare
Environmental Zone
1. Waste disposal
2. Energy consumption
3. Resource preservation
Economic Zone
1. Money circulation
2. Ownership
3. Scale
Personal Benefit Zone
1. Quality
2. Personal safety/health
3. Household finances
Importance given to each zone and each dimension can vary by consumer
segment, product category, brand, and consumer and industry idiosyncrasies
Consumer Attitudes Toward Sustainability
02
11 Understanding the Sustainable Consumer: Lessons Learned and Upcoming Research in 2013 © 2013 The Hartman Group, Inc
THE GAP! | Consumers do not yet make the connection between sustainability and sustainable companies and products
Q16/Q12/Q16 Are you familiar with the term 'sustainability'?
Q17_2/Q14_6/Q18_6 I don’t know where to buy such products. I don't know which products are sustainable. – Bottom-2 Box Disagree.
Q17_1/Q14_2/Q18_2 I don't know which companies support sustainable values. – Bottom-2 Box Disagree.
Base n=1606-2007; 1856-2008; 1982-2010.
54% 56%
69%
12%
25%
21%
5%
12% 12%
0%
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
60%
70%
80%
2007 2008 2010
Familiar with term"sustainability"
Can identify asustainable product
Can identify asustainable company
Significant Gap
12 Understanding the Sustainable Consumer: Lessons Learned and Upcoming Research in 2013 © 2013 The Hartman Group, Inc
Literal definitions of “sustainability” have lost prominence as consumers become more familiar with sustainability
64%
50%
50%
44%
42%
40%
37%
31%
31%
31%
27%
26%
17%
15%
14%
13%
13%
13%
76%
44%
44%
55%
33%
35%
25%
32%
22%
23%
N/A
N/A
17%
11%
12%
12%
11%
12%
Ability to last over time
Recycle, reuse, reduce
Conserving natural resources
Ability to support oneself (self-reliance)
Environmentally friendly
Responsibility
Responsible farming methods
Economic viability
Reducing carbon footprint
Green
Stewardship of land
Maintaining a clean water supply
High quality
All natural
Simple living
Fair trade
Organic
Humane treatment of animals
What does sustainability mean to you?
2010
2008
Q13/Q17. The word sustainability may mean different things to different people. What does it mean to you? Base: Consumers familiar with the term
“sustainability” n=1151-2008; 1352-2010.
*N/A: not tracked that year
Responsible farming methods
has increased substantially over
two years
Literal or
dictionary
definitions
have
declined
13 Understanding the Sustainable Consumer: Lessons Learned and Upcoming Research in 2013 © 2013 The Hartman Group, Inc
Personal benefits and social dimensions of responsibility are important considerations in consumer purchase decisions
82%
79%
74%
72%
72%
71%
71%
68%
66%
66%
65%
45%
45%
42%
Provides quality products
Provides safe working conditions for its employees
Sells products/services at low prices
Provides good wages and benefits to its workers
Reduces waste and pollution
Minimizes environmental impact of its production
Avoids inhumane treatment of animals
Is energy-efficient
Is involved in the community
Reduces the use of non-renewable resources
Avoids unnecessary packaging
Gives a percentage of its profits to charities I like
Is a local company
Ensures the best possible return to its shareholders
It’s important that the company…
Q13-Q14. When deciding which product/service to purchase, how important is it that THE COMPANY that produces the product/service…? – Top-2
Box importance. Base: Significant shoppers inside the World of Sustainability n=1691-2010.
Social
Environmental
Economic
Personal benefit
14 Understanding the Sustainable Consumer: Lessons Learned and Upcoming Research in 2013 © 2013 The Hartman Group, Inc
Social and environmental factors are more valued by the Core whereas the Periphery tends to value personal benefits
87%
97%
95%
96%
37%
97%
91%
88%
28%
84%
87%
81%
81%
57%
80%
67%
70%
38%
63%
54%
46%
44%
58%
35%
32%
27%
36%
59%
30%
20%
21%
78%
11%
13%
11%
47%
I would like to see companies' sustainablepractices be more visible to the public
I support companies that help my localcommunity
I am an avid recycler
I am aware of local community issues
When shopping, the most important feature Iconsider is price
I avoid buying products from companies withpoor labor practices
I look for products that are not tested on animals
I avoid buying products with excessivepackaging
When shopping, I primarily look for productsthat personally benefit me and my family,
regardless of its social or environmental effects
Core
Inner Mid-level
Outer Mid-levelPeriphery
Q19. Please indicate how strongly you agree or disagree with the following statements. – Top-2 Box importance. Base: Significant shoppers inside the
World of Sustainability n=294-Core; 564-Inner Mid-level; 614- Outer Mid-level; 219-Periphery.
Sustainable Purchasing and Products 03
16 Understanding the Sustainable Consumer: Lessons Learned and Upcoming Research in 2013 © 2013 The Hartman Group, Inc
Cost is a key barrier for purchasing based on sustainability concerns
Q12. At times when purchasing decisions are not based on such concerns (the environment and social well-being), what are the main reasons why
these issues don't influence your decision? Base: Significant shoppers inside the World of Sustainability n=294-Core; 564-Inner Mid-level; 614- Outer
Mid-level; 219-Periphery.
42%
27%
18%
20%
13%
13%
10%
5%
46%
32%
18%
21%
14%
9%
5%
5%
44%
39%
19%
17%
14%
9%
5%
6%
44%
43%
23%
17%
12%
6%
5%
6%
It takes too much money
There are too many other things I have to worry about
It is too complicated
Acting alone, I can't have much impact
It takes too much time
Such issues are too depressing to think about
The negative effects won't be felt in my lifetime
I'm not really concerned
Core
Inner Mid-level
Outer Mid-level
Periphery
Periphery
consumers are
mostly apathetic
about
sustainability
because they
have too many
other worries in
their lives
17 Understanding the Sustainable Consumer: Lessons Learned and Upcoming Research in 2013 © 2013 The Hartman Group, Inc
Grocery stores and supercenters are the most common channels used by sustainability shoppers
Q67. Where do you typically shop? Base: Significant shoppers inside the World of Sustainability n=1691.
78%
65%
43%
43%
37%
33%
33%
31%
21%
19%
17%
16%
14%
13%
6%
4%
3%
Grocery store
Supercenter (e.g., Walmart, Target)
Pharmacy/Drugstore
Home improvement store
Dollar store (e.g., Dollar General)
Online
Club store (e.g., Sam's, Costco)
Farmers' market
Local hardware store
Convenience store (e.g. 7-Eleven)
Natural/Health food store (e.g., Whole Foods Market)
Local nursery (garden store)
Specialty/Ethnic Food Store (e.g., Trader Joe's)
Direct Mail/Catalog/Internet
Food co-op
Community Supported Agriculture/Farm (CSA)
Direct from sales rep/manufacturer (e.g., Amway)
Average Number of Channels Selected
Core Inner ML Outer ML Periphery
6.3 5.1 4.4 3.7
18 Understanding the Sustainable Consumer: Lessons Learned and Upcoming Research in 2013 © 2013 The Hartman Group, Inc
Sustainability category adoption pathway
Food and beverages
CFL light bulbs
Household cleaning
products*
Energy-efficient appliances
Water-efficient devices
Recycled paper products
Reusable shopping
bags
Reusable
mugs/bottles*
Personal care
products
Human grade pet food
Growing own vegetables
Lawn/garden fertilizers
Hybrid vehicles*
Over-the-counter
medications
Programmable thermostats
Building home chicken
coops
Compost bins
Electric vehicles
Rain barrels
Food service
establishments
* Indicates categories that are adopted earlier than in 2008
19 Understanding the Sustainable Consumer: Lessons Learned and Upcoming Research in 2013 © 2013 The Hartman Group, Inc
Sustainable versions of fresh food categories are the most commonly purchased
Q28. Which of the following foods or beverages have you purchased or consumed in the past 30 days? n=1691.
Q29. Which of the following specific foods or beverages have you purchased or used in the past 30 days? Base: Significant shoppers inside the World of Sustainability
n=1691.
Q30. For which of the following foods/beverages are you willing to pay 20% more for a sustainable version? Base: Significant shoppers inside the World of Sustainability
that purchased category in Q28 n varies.
Which of the following FOODS have you purchased or consumed
in the past 30 days? Consumed
Consumed
Sustainable
Version
Willing to
pay 20%
more
Bread 84% 12% 24%
Fresh fruit 79% 17% 34%
Fresh vegetables 77% 19% 36%
Eggs 77% 12% 35%
White meat (e.g., chicken, other poultry, pork) 76% 11% 33%
Cold cereal 69% 9% 18%
Chips (potato or tortilla) 69% 10% 16%
Red meat 67% 7% 30%
Butter 66% 4% 21%
Pasta sauces, canned tomatoes, salsa 64% 10% 17%
Packaged cheese (sold in dairy case) 59% 4% 18%
Condiments 59% 4% 12%
Yogurt 55% 8% 26%
Packaged foods (e.g., boxed macaroni and cheese) 52% 7% 14%
Nuts 49% 9% 22%
Communicating Sustainability
04
21 Understanding the Sustainable Consumer: Lessons Learned and Upcoming Research in 2013 © 2013 The Hartman Group, Inc
43%
26%
22%
19%
19%
18%
17%
16%
16%
35%
33%
25%
23%
20%
27%
17%
18%
15%
Online
Product label
TV/Radio
Newspapers
Books/Magazines
In-store information
Friend or colleague
Advertisements
Family member
2010
2008
The Internet continues to be the most commonly used information source for sustainability
Q25. Which of the following information sources have you used in the past 3 months to learn about sustainable products/services or companies?
Base: Consumers inside the World of Sustainability n=1662-2008; 1767-2010.
22 Understanding the Sustainable Consumer: Lessons Learned and Upcoming Research in 2013 © 2013 The Hartman Group, Inc
Certifications | Consumers are often uncertain about what they mean, but find them reassuring and positive elements on packages
Certifications (e.g. NPA, Certified Humane, Fair Trade) are most important for consumers in the Core as they recognize, understand and trust the certifications.
Periphery consumers and many Mid-level consumers
• do not typically seek out specific certifications
• do not understand the certification standards or processes
• do not know much about the certification governing bodies
• however, simply seeing a certification seal on a package reassures them that “someone is making sure this product is what it says it is”
23 Understanding the Sustainable Consumer: Lessons Learned and Upcoming Research in 2013 © 2013 The Hartman Group, Inc
One of the best ways to communicate sustainability to consumers is via product or brand narratives
Narratives must include three key elements:
• Transparency – the story must be true/verifiable
• Raison d’etre – there must be a compelling reason for why the product came to market
• Emotional hook – the story must resonate with consumers at an emotional level, not just a functional level
Key narrative genres include:
• Charismatic founder narrative (e.g. Clif Bar, Stonyfield Farms, etc.)
• Unique production narrative (e.g. grass-fed beef, use of artisanal techniques)
• Unique varietal narrative (e.g., Scarlet Runner heirloom beans)
• Food artisan narrative (e.g. recipe developed by Wolfgang Puck)
• Geographic origin narrative (e.g. Walla Walla onions)
• Culinary sanctification narrative (via chef, magazine, food critics, etc.)
• Distinctive retail origin (e.g. restaurant, artisan shop, etc.)
Sustainability Study 2013
05
25 Understanding the Sustainable Consumer: Lessons Learned and Upcoming Research in 2013 © 2013 The Hartman Group, Inc
Methodology
The Hartman Group will utilize and integrate qualitative ethnographic research and quantitative survey research in our upcoming study Sustainability 2013: When Personal Aspirations and Behavior Diverge.
• Qualitative Research
• Fielding in two major U.S. markets— Seattle and Atlanta
• In-depth ethnographic interview techniques including consumer artifact collection
• One-on-one interviews, group interviews and in-store interviews
• Quantitative Research
• Online quantitative survey
• Nationally representative sample of 1,600 U.S. primary adult household shoppers
• All major demographic segments will have adequate representation to allow for individual analyses.
26 Understanding the Sustainable Consumer: Lessons Learned and Upcoming Research in 2013 © 2013 The Hartman Group, Inc
Areas of Exploration
Our integrated approach allows us to go beyond the usual listing of motivators
and barriers to uncover the principal drivers responsible for moving consumers
along the adoption path in the World of Sustainability.
This research will answer key questions about consumers and the sustainable
marketplace, such as:
• What does “sustainability” mean to consumers today?
• How has consumers’ understanding shifted over time?
• What categories matter most to consumers when putting their dollars
toward sustainable products? What is the adoption pathway?
• What are the barriers to purchase and how can you overcome them?
• Why do consumers say they want to purchase sustainable products but fail
to actually buy them in some categories?
• How can you make YOUR product or service most relevant to consumers?
Our years of research in the sustainability arena will allow us to conduct an
longitudinal analysis of foundational questions.
27 Understanding the Sustainable Consumer: Lessons Learned and Upcoming Research in 2013 © 2013 The Hartman Group, Inc
Benefits of Study Sponsorship
Sponsors of the research will receive the following benefits:
• Input into study topics of exploration and design
• Exclusive access to proprietary builds to the research
• Early access to study results
• A high impact report written in PowerPoint format and detailed
demographic data tables in Excel format
• Ongoing support after delivery to answer follow up questions
• Preferred pricing for custom onsite presentation or webinar of study results
28 Understanding the Sustainable Consumer: Lessons Learned and Upcoming Research in 2013 © 2013 The Hartman Group, Inc
Interested? Learn More!
Contact us today to receive the complete
study overview.
Mention this webinar and receive a
$2,500 discount off sponsorship.
Lori Barsness
Marketing Services
(425) 452-0818 x 109
THE HARTMAN GROUP, INC
1621 114TH AVE SE, STE 105 BELLEVUE, WA 98004
TEL (425) 452 0818 FAX (425) 452 9092
HARTMAN-GROUP.COM