8/7/2019 Understanding Chinese Philosophy

1/2

1 / 2

Why Asian Philosophy is Misunderstood in the West

Recently I wrote an article for the Australia China Foundation Association (ACFA)

web site about Asian and particularly, Chinese Philosophy and why it has been

misunderstood in the west for centuries. I must admit this was an article I planned

to write for Shadow in the Flame but I highly recommend it to you as a starter forunderstanding where Chinese philosophy differs from western philosophy.

Practically from their earliest contact with the Orient, Western philosophers have

had little understanding of the philosophical traditions of China. In fact their

common view was, and still is in many places, that ancient Chinese writing is not

philosophy, but religion or some form of mysticism.

Apart from anything else the strangest thing about this view is, that in all three of

the major Chinese philosophies;

Confucianism Taoism Buddhism

there is no God, which is viewed as essential in the traditional western

understanding of, and a prerequisite to be, a religion. So while the West has often

pointed to China as the great atheist nation they have at the same time tended to

lump the huge body of ethical and metaphysical discussion, which goes back at

least 4,000 years, into the same basket as mysticism and strange religions.

What is P hilosophy?

It is totally inappropriate to talk about Eastern or Western Philosophy as thougheither one were a homogenous body of thought. Western Philosophy has many,diverse and assorted streams of Philosophy and so it is with Chinese and AsianPhilosophies as well.

So what is philosophy? While philosophers love to debate this question, roughly

speaking, philosophy is basically the critical discussion of ethical and metaphysicalquestions. And generally it is broken down into two major themes: ethics andmetaphysics.

One deals with the nature of reality and the other deals with how to live.

Philosophy is the skill of articulating views on these particular questions.

But there is more to it than that.

Philosophy involves not just an expression of such a view, but also asking yourself

whether that view is right or not? What are the alternatives? Why should I prefermy particular view to the alternatives?

Thus critical discussion plays an integral role in philosophy. And the question forthis article is Does Asian philosophy and Chinese philosophy in particular, satisfythis criteria?

You cannot read Indian texts or Buddhist, Hindu, Taoist and Confucian teachingsand not find the articulation of world views. All these schools of thought deal withethics and the metaphysical while some are more skewered one way rather than

8/7/2019 Understanding Chinese Philosophy

2/2

2 / 2

the other, for example Confucius was more concerned with ethical issues while LaoTzu, who wrote the Tao de Ching, was more interested in the metaphysical issues.

Where you do see a difference and therefore why some Western philosophers pointto Eastern philosophy and say Well, this isn't really philosophy is because you

don't find much critical appraisal in the Eastern tradition or at least not in the samestyle as you do in Western philosophy.

However, I believe that a large part of this conception was due to the fact that, formuch of the time since we discovered these countries, we have not had access totheir traditional literature because so little of it had been translated into English andother European languages. But if you could read Sanskrit you would find youcannot read good texts of Indian philosophy without seeing a lot of critical debates.

There are many schools of Indian philosophy, and for several hundreds, if notthousands of years, they were arguing against each other with very sophisticatedphilosophical arguments. You've only got to read the text to see that.

China is a bit more difficult. That's because typically Chinese philosophy is written

in a different way. In fact if there is a divide between world philosophies, it's notthe Euphrates (separating Asia from Europe, the river originates in Turkey and ends in the

Persian Gulf), it's in the Himalayas.

Once you get over differences of style, Indian philosophy is written very much likeWestern philosophy.

Not so Chinese philosophy. The arguments are put in a different way. Often theyproceed by analogy, so you'll get someone arguing for a position in Chinesephilosophy by giving you examples, analogies and metaphors.

These are things that you do find in Western philosophy as well, they are a

perfectly well recognised form of argument, but you get a lot more of them inChinese philosophy than you do in Western philosophy.

But any student of Ancient Chinese philosophers will soon see that these guys doargue with each other. There are many famous debates between the differentschools of neo-Confucianism, between the Taoists and the Confucians, and so on.

If you would like to read more about the type of debate that went on in AncientChina, I recommend my article Confucius on Moral Action and Human Natureon www.shadowintheflame.com/chinesephilosophy which looks at the debate and

contra philosophical arguments that went on over hundreds of years as the Chinesephilosophers developed their philosophy of moral action and human nature.

Ric Vatner