UNCLASSIFIED

UNCLASSIFIED

DoDAF Delivering Architectures to the

World Presentation to

GTRA Architecture GOV Symposium

07 December 2008 Walt Okon

Senior Architect Engineer for Standards Architecture and Interoperability Directorate

Deputy Assistant Secretary of Defense for Information Management, Integration, and Technology & DoD Deputy Chief Information Officer

(703) 607- 0502 . walt.okon@osd.mil

UNCLASSIFIED

UNCLASSIFIED

Strategy and Direction

DoDAF Version 2.0 Architecture Training - Architects Competencies DoDAF Metamodel “Fit for Purpose” Architecture Defense-Industry Challenge – DoDAF + MODAF = UPDM DoD IT Standards Registry (DISR)DoD IT Standards Registry (DISR) IC & DoD IT Standards IntegrationIC & DoD IT Standards Integration DoD GIG Technical Guidance (GTG) DoD GIG Technical Guidance (GTG) Architects Career Path, Competencies & CertificationsArchitects Career Path, Competencies & Certifications DoD Information Sharing EnvironmentDoD Information Sharing Environment

Discussions:

UNCLASSIFIED

UNCLASSIFIED

Key Policies Requiring DoDAF

Joint Staff CJCSI 3170.01F, 1 MAY 2007, “JOINT CAPABILITIES

INTEGRATION AND DEVELOPMENT SYSTEM”

CJCSM 3170.01C, 1 MAY 2007, “OPERATION OF THE JOINT CAPABILITIES INTEGRATION AND DEVELOPMENT SYSTEM”

CJCSI 6212.01D, 8 MAR 2006, “INTEROPERABILITY AND SUPPORTABILITY OF INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY AND NATIONAL SECURITY SYSTEMS”

Direct support for the Warfighter

UNCLASSIFIED

UNCLASSIFIEDDoDAF Evolution To Support “Fit For

Purpose” Architecture

(Published in 2003)

(Published in 2007)

DoDAF 1.5• Addresses Net-Centricity • Volume III is CADM & Architecture Data Strategy• Addresses Architecture Federation• Baseline for DoDAF 2.0• Shifted away from DoDAF mandating a set of products

DoDAFDoDAF

2.02.0

(To Be Published)(Late 2008)

DoDAF 2.0• Cover Enterprise and Program Architecture• Emphasize Data versus Products• Tailored Presentation• AV-1 to capture federation metadata• Quality Support to Decision Processes• FEA & Allied/Coalition Support• Journal - Errata & Interim Releases

DoDAF 1.0• CADM Separate• Baseline For DoDAF 1.5• Removed Essential & Supporting Designations• Expanded audience to all of DoD

UNCLASSIFIED

UNCLASSIFIEDFocused on DoD Decisions

M

C

E

P

FederatedFederatedArchitecturesArchitectures

FederatedFederatedArchitecturesArchitectures

E – EnterpriseM – Mission AreaC – DoD ComponentP - Program

DoD Core DoD Core Decision ProcessesDecision Processes

DoD Core DoD Core Decision ProcessesDecision Processes

PPBE/PfM

JCIDS

DOTLMPF

Acquisition

Systems Eng

Architecture IT Technology

GovernanceGovernanceLink Technology to ObjectivesInstitutionalize IT Best PracticesProtect digital assets

Cost ViewCapability View

SE ViewAcquisition

etc.

ArchitectureArchitectureViewsViews

ArchitectureArchitectureViewsViews

““Fit for Purpose”Fit for Purpose”

UNCLASSIFIED

UNCLASSIFIED

Data &

Information

View

OV-7

Net-Centric

View

SV-11

All “Service”

Versions of

SV Products

Systems

View

All “Systems” Versions of SV Products

DoDAF V1.5

Capability

View

Project

View

System

Engineering

View

Standards

View

Operational

View

Rest of OVs

All TVs

All

ViewAll AVs

DoDAF V2.0

NewUpdated Moved

DoDAF Metamodel (DM2)

Fit ForPurpose

PresentationDashboards Graphical

DepictionsReference

ModelsFusion

ProductsCompositeProducts

UNCLASSIFIED

UNCLASSIFIED

7

DoDAF 2.0 Viewpoints

All V

iewp

oin

tO

ve

rarc

hin

g a

sp

ec

ts o

f arc

hite

ctu

re c

on

tex

t tha

t rela

te to

all v

iew

s

Data an

d In

form

ation

View

po

int

Artic

ula

te th

e d

ata

rela

tion

sh

ips

an

d a

lign

me

nt s

truc

ture

s in

the

a

rch

itec

ture

co

nte

nt

Stan

dard

s View

po

int

Artic

ula

te a

pp

lica

ble

Op

era

tion

al, B

us

ine

ss

, Te

ch

nic

al, a

nd

Ind

us

try

po

licy

, sta

nd

ard

s, g

uid

an

ce

, co

ns

train

ts, a

nd

fore

ca

sts

Systems Viewpoint

Articulate the legacy systems or independent systems, their composition, interconnectivity, and context

providing for, or supporting, DoD functions

Services Viewpoint

Articulate the performers, activities, services, and their exchanges providing for, or supporting, DoD functions

Operational Viewpoint

Articulate operational scenarios, processes, activities & requirements

Capability ViewpointArticulate the capability requirement, delivery timing,

and deployed capability

Pro

ject View

po

int

De

sc

ribe

s th

e re

latio

ns

hip

s b

etw

ee

n o

pe

ratio

na

l an

d c

ap

ab

ility

req

uire

me

nts

an

d th

e v

ario

us

pro

jec

ts b

ein

g im

ple

me

nte

d; D

eta

ils

de

pe

nd

en

cie

s b

etw

ee

n c

ap

ab

ility m

an

ag

em

en

t an

d th

e D

efe

ns

e

Ac

qu

isitio

n S

ys

tem

pro

ce

ss

.

UNCLASSIFIED

UNCLASSIFIED

Vision Statement

To enable the development of architectures that are meaningful, useful, and relevant to the DoD Requirements, Planning, Budgeting, Systems Engineering, and Acquisition decision processes.

UNCLASSIFIED

UNCLASSIFIED

class Class Model

Capabilities Serv ices

Projects

PerformersObject Exchanges

RulesMeasures

Foundation

according-to according-toto-meet

meet

satisfy follow

lead-to lead-to

meet comply-with

result-inresult-in

conduct

class Capability

Type

Capability

TemporalType

Effect

TemporalType

CapabilityConfiguration

Type

Measure

TemporalType

Condition

Performer

Organization

ExchangeObject

Materiel

TemporalType

Skill

ExchangeObjectPerformer

PersonnelType

InterfaceTypeTemporalType

Activ ity

TemporalType

RealProperty

Performer

System

realizes

1..*

is-part-of

0..*

is-a-part-of

0..*

is-a-part-of

is-a-part-of

0..*

is-a-part-of

0..*

is-a-part-of

0..*

results-in

0..*

0..*

is-a-part-of

0..*

applies-to

0..*

1..*

is-performed-under

class Serv ices

TemporalType

Effect

Type

Measure

TemporalType

Condition

Organization

ExchangeObject

Materiel

TemporalType

Skill

ExchangeObject

PersonnelType

InterfaceTypeTemporalType

Activ ity

TemporalType

RealProperty

System

Serv iceRequirement

Serv iceImplementation

Rule

Standard

PerformerState

Performer

SoftwareServ ice

is-a-part-of

0..*

results-in

0..*

0..*

applies-to 0..*

0..*

performs1..*is-performed-by

class ExhangeObjectFlow

PerformerState

Performer

TemporalType

ExchangeObject

Data

Materiel

Information

InterfaceTypeTemporalType

Activ ity

Rule

Standard

according-

to

PersonnelType

1..*

is-performed-by

0..*

performs

0..*

is-produced-by

0..*

0..*

is-consumed-by0..*

is-a-part-of

class Project

Ev ent

Type

Vision

TemporalType

Project

TemporalType

Goal

Cost

Plan

Rule

Means

InterfaceTypeTemporalType

Activ ity

TemporalType

Condition

TemporalType

PerformerState

TemporalType

EffectType

Measure

1..*

initiates-stimulates

0..*

is-realized-by

0..*

directs

0..*

1..*

is-realized-by

initiatesis-necessary-for

0..*

seeksChangeTo

1..*

0..*

changes

1..*

0..*

results-in

0..*

0..*

applies-to

0..*

class Rule

Type

Rule

Standard

Agreement

FunctionalStandard TechnicalStandard

Guidance

Constraint

TemporalType

Condition

Means

UCORE IC-ISM-v 2::SecurityAttributesGroup

0..*

is-valid-under

1..*

class Measure - WIP

Cost

Type

Baseline::Measure

Timeliness

RateThroughput

Capacity

AccuracyPrecision

Dependability

NeedsSatisfactionMeasure

PerformanceMeasure

MaintainabilityMeasure

AdaptabilityMeasure

OrganizationalMeasure

Interoperability

Trustw orthiness

Reliability

Security

class Performer

Performer

ExchangeObject

PersonnelType

System

SoftwareServ ice

Organization

TemporalType

Skill

ExchangeObject

Materiel

InterfaceTypeTemporalType

Activ ity

Rule

StandardTemporalType

Network

TemporalType

PerformerState

according-

to

AbstractFeatureType

GeoFeature

Location

1..*

is-performed-by

is-a-part-of

0..*

performs

is at

2..*

is-part-of

DoDAF Metamodel

UNCLASSIFIED

UNCLASSIFIED

DoDAF Conceptual Model

UNCLASSIFIED

UNCLASSIFIED“Fit for Purpose” Architecture Descriptions

UNCLASSIFIED

UNCLASSIFIED

EA Summit

23 Jan 08

2nd

QTR 083rd

QTR 08

Feb AugJun OctSepJulAprMar May

PfM WSPPBE WS

Feb 08

Nov

EA Conf14-19 Apr

SPIRAL II4 Apr 08

SPIRAL III27 Jun 08

SPIRAL IV12 Sep 08

Notional DoDAF v2.0 Development Schedule (cont)

DoD CIOApproval

Post to

DARS

Phase IIPhase II

Phase IPhase I

Phase IIIPhase III

Plenary22 July

Vwendor Tool

Session

4th

QTR 08

Plenary1 Apr

DevelopWriting

Technical Editing

Cood

Validation

UNCLASSIFIED

UNCLASSIFIED DODAF Version 2.0 in Coordination

Core Management Group - 10 December 2008

Discuss DoDAF Version 2 Spiral 4 Draft. – Comment and adjudication

Next Step: OSD NII Informal coordination– Comment and adjudication

EA Summit – Services, Agencies, and COCOMs

DoD Executive Coordination Committee

UNCLASSIFIED

UNCLASSIFIED Metadata Registration Service

Federation Repository

Register Provider

View Provider

Update Provider

Register Metadata

Search Holdings

Repository/Tool Environment

SOAP DDMS + Metadata

(XML)

FederationClient

AV-1 metadata captured and extracted by repository/tool environment

Federation Client Services Menu

DARSFederated Catalog

DARS Federation Web Services

UNCLASSIFIED

UNCLASSIFIED

DoD Architecture Federation

Force Application Force Application

Building PartnershipsBuilding Partnerships

Command & ControlCommand & Control

ProtectionProtection

LogisticsLogistics

Force Support Force Support

Corporate Management & SupportCorporate Management & Support

Net-centricNet-centric

Battlespace AwarenessBattlespace Awareness

IEA

GLOBAL C2GLOBAL C2 JC2JC2

JDDA

COMMS & TransportCOMMS & Transport

TAMD

IA A

rch

itec

ture

BE

A

HRM Architecture

Oth

er

DIS

A

DL

A

NS

A

NR

O

NG

A

DIADept of Army Dept of Navy Dept of Air Force

Army Architecture

DON Architecture

Air Force Architecture

Solution Architectures

Join

t C

apab

ilit

y A

reas

MS&SM

RP&ILM

WSLM FM

HRM

DoD Enterprise Architecture

Ref Models Tech Stds Arch Guidance Laws, Regs, and Policy

DISR DODAF LawsDoD EA RM

Tools

DITPR Regs Policy

UNCLASSIFIED

UNCLASSIFIEDDefense-Industry Challenge:

Synchronization of DoDAF-UPDM Lifecycles

2. Industry Produces Develops Generic

Modeling &EngineeringStandards

3. Vendors Produce Product

VersionsDefense Domain Tools

“Just-In-Time”

1. GovernmentsProduce BaselinesDevelop, Evolve &

HarmonizeDefense Enterprise

ArchitectureFrameworks

For Acquisition

Leverages Vendors Standards-Based Tools & Government Frameworks

Core Architecture Data Model

All View

Syst

ems/S

ervi

ces

View

Technical StandardsV

iew

Operational View

RFC

UNCLASSIFIED

UNCLASSIFIED

UPDM – Unified UPDM – Unified Profile for Profile for

DoDAF/MODAFDoDAF/MODAF

UPDM RFC GroupUPDM RFC Group

AdaptiveAdaptive

Artisan SoftwareArtisan Software

ASMGASMG

BAE SystemsBAE Systems

DoDDoD

embeddedPlusembeddedPlus

GenericGeneric

Lockheed Martin CoLockheed Martin CoMitreMitreMODMOD

No MagicNo Magic

RaytheonRaytheon

Rolls RoyceRolls Royce

Sparx SystemsSparx Systems

VisumPointVisumPoint

UNCLASSIFIED

UNCLASSIFIED

UPDM in General

Significantly enhance the quality, productivity, and effectiveness of architecture modeling

Promote architecture model reuse and maintainability

Improve tool interoperability and communications between stakeholders

Reduce training impacts due to different tool implementations and semantics

Improve the integration between system of systems modeling and system modeling to support post acquisition life cycle design modeling

DNDAF

DoDAF 1.5NAF

MODAF 1.2

UPDMUPDM

UPDM is an OMG initiative to develop a modeling standard that supports both the USA Department of Defense Architecture Framework (DoDAF) and the UK Ministry of Defence Architecture Framework (MODAF)

The UPDM Group was setup to:

UNCLASSIFIED

UNCLASSIFIED

Motivation– Significantly enhance the quality, productivity, and

effectiveness associated with enterprise and system of systems architecture modeling, promote architecture model reuse and maintainability, improve tool interoperability and communications between stakeholders, and reduce training impacts due to different tool implementations and semantics.

– Improve the integration between system of systems modeling and system modeling to support post acquisition life cycle design modeling.

UPDM fully supported by DoD, MOD, IDEAS

– Statement and slides available on OMG website

Need for UPDM

UNCLASSIFIED

UNCLASSIFIED

Federated Federated ArchitecturesArchitectures

The ConnectionThe Connection

UNCLASSIFIED

UNCLASSIFIED What the Operator Sees Today

UNCLASSIFIED

UNCLASSIFIEDWhat the Operator Expects to See

UNCLASSIFIED

UNCLASSIFIED

FederationStrategy

FederationStrategy

DARS

MILDEP COCOM AGENCY

•CADM•DoDAF•NCOW RM

DoD EAReference Models

DA

TA

DA

TA

RE

QT

S.

RE

QT

S.

DoD Decision ProcessesDoD Decision Processes

COI yCOI yCOI x

COI x

Reporting (OMB, GAO, etc)Reporting (OMB, GAO, etc)

A Federation of Data Producers

•COI = Community of Interest•CADM = Core Architecture Data Model•DoDAF = DoD Architecture Framework•NCOW RM – Net-Centric Operations & Warfare Reference Model• UPDM = UML Profile DoDAF & MODAF

UNCLASSIFIED

UNCLASSIFIED

DoD EA Federation Strategy

Available on DARS Website: https://dars1.army.mil/IER/index.jsp

UNCLASSIFIED

UNCLASSIFIED

DoD EA Federation Pilot Use BTA/USTRANSCOM/Marine Corps:

– Federate the BEA with JDDA and Marine Corps Logistic architectures and register in DARS to gain visibility into “end to end” logistics process

Army:– Create a “knowledge base” through architecture federation for Army

communities.– Test tools and concepts through federation, i.e. social networking

(ontology development, semantic indexing,) architecture data analysis, UPDM applicability

Air Force: – Establish interface and search capability between DARS and AFARS.

Demonstrate search capability

Navy:– Implement and use procedures outlined in the GIG Enterprise

Architecture Federation Strategy and DARS CONOPS to create a repeatable federation process

Joint Staff/J6I:– Identify interface points and alignment between Mission Area-level

architectures to obtain enable a horizontal view across mission areas and drill down to Program level.

DARS:– Develop registration template for AV-1 and DDMS metadata

26UNCLASSIFIED

UNCLASSIFIED

DoD IT Standards Registry DoD IT Standards Registry (DISR)(DISR)

IC/DoD IT Standards IC/DoD IT Standards Registry Registry

UNCLASSIFIED

UNCLASSIFIED

IT and NSS Interoperability and Supportability

Policy and Process OverviewDoD Sponsored Policy

• JCIDS Documents (ICD, CDD, CPD) ACAT I - III & Special Interest

• J6 Interoperability Requirements Certification of All JCIDS Docs (JCPAT-E Tool)

• ITS & NSS Predecessor Doc. System Profile Requirement- IT Standards Profile (DISRonline)- IIC Profile (LISI)

• Maintain OASD(NII) JCIDS/ISP Assessment Capability(JCPAT-E Tool)

• Maintain IT Standards and Profiles(DISRonline)

• Certify Standards Conformance

• ITS and NSS Interoperability Requirements Certification

• Assessments of NR-KPP in JCIDS Docs

KM/DS

Joint StaffJ-8

CJCSI6212.01D

Joint Staff J-6 Interoperability Requirements Certification Process

DoDI4630.8DoDI4630.8

CJCSI3170.01CCJCSM3170.01

DoDD5000.1

JROCFCB

JCPAT-E

ITS & NSS

Registration

DISR Online

LISI InspeQtor

J6

Interoperability Requirements

Certification

= • UAM / JCPAT- E System Registration

• Technical View (CDD & CPD)

• Interoperability & InterconnectivityProfile (CDD & CPD)

J6I

Stage I, II & III

Assessments

= •

•

JCPAT

JCPAT

JCPAT

JCPAT

JCPAT

JCPAT

JCPAT

JCPAT

Joint Staff J-6 OASD(NII)

UNCLASSIFIED

UNCLASSIFIEDDISR and DISRonline Architecture View

DoD IT Standards Registry (DISRonline)Lifecycle Tagged: Emerging and Retired Standards

Profile Assistance Software

Organization-Unique Bins

- - - - - - - - - - Information /

Guidance (I/G)Informational Standards

Best Practices

Procedures

Policies

Manuals

Handbooks

Other IT Documents

Change Request Tool Software

PM System IT Standards

ProfilesTVs *

Governanceand General Information Area

Policy

FAQs

CM Procedures

User Guides

Links

SOP

POCs

GIG Mission Area Management

Voting Tool Software Collaboration Tool

Software

* May Contain Standards from Lifecycle Categories other than Mandated

DISR Mandated StandardsMandated “Net-Centric” & Mandated Sunset “Interoperability”

Standards

DISR Profile Registry Area

KeyInterface Profiles *(KIPs)

PrescribedTechnology

Profiles * (IPv6, PKI etc.)

Future

Enhancements

Objectives: Champion DoD’s

Re-Engagement of the IT Standards Communities

Online IT standards Registry

Tri-Annual Update of IT Standards Registry

Tied to JCIDS IT Standards Conformance and Compliance Process

Intelligence Community Cross Coordination (ICSR)

Improved DoD Visibility and Participation in IT Standards Development Organizations

Develop and Register PM Standards Profiles (TV)

Standing IT Standards Working Groups Aligned to GIG Portfolio Management

UNCLASSIFIED

UNCLASSIFIED

Lifecycle of a Standard

Emerging

– Upgradeability Should be a Concern

– May be Implemented but Not in Lieu of Mandated Standard

– Expected to be Mandated within Three Years Mandated

– Essential for Interoperability and Net-Centric Services in DoD

– Minimum Set of Essential Standards for the Acquisition of All DoD Systems that Produce, Use, or Exchange Info, and, When Implemented, Facilitates the Flow of Info in Support of Warfighter

– Sunset Tag Identifies an Event and Date to Retire a Standard Inactive / Retired

– New Standards / Technology Now Available and Implemented– Require Waiver and Migration Plan – Remain in the Registry

UNCLASSIFIED

UNCLASSIFIEDIT Standards Governance Organization

Membership

Technical Working Groups

UNCLASSIFIED

UNCLASSIFIED

DoD GIG Technical Guidance (GTG)DoD GIG Technical Guidance (GTG)

Walt OkonWalt Okon

UNCLASSIFIED

UNCLASSIFIED

DoD Technical Guidance Concept

CapabilityGIG

Technical Guidance

Standards &

Specifications

For

Interoperability

Query &Retrieve

IdentifiedInteroperability

Standard,Specifications,And Interfaces

Capability Development Areas

Joint Capability Areas

StandardsSpecifications

Mission Area Portfolios

StandardsSpecifications

Community Of Interest

StandardsSpecifications

GIG Governance Processes

StandardsSpecifications

Structured and Unstructured Sources

for Standards and Specifications

(Notional)

DARS

. . .

DKOCADM

463080XX

XML Metadata Registry

SFIS Taxonomy

DetailedInteroperabilityStandards &

SpecificationsInformation

DISRNCID

Technical Direction

Query

Technical Direction

Query

XML Schemas/

Components

UNCLASSIFIED

UNCLASSIFIED

Architects Career PathArchitects Career Path

Architects CompetenciesArchitects Competencies

Architects CertificationsArchitects Certifications

UNCLASSIFIED

UNCLASSIFIED IMPROVING DOD’S ARCHITECTURE

Guidance– DoDAF v2.0– Federated Architecture Strategy

Tools– DoD Architecture Registry System (DARS)– DoD IT Standards Registry (DISR)– Type II – GIG Technical Direction

Education and Training– DoD Architecture Training Effort

All this is nothing without Certified Architects!

UNCLASSIFIED

UNCLASSIFIED

ARCHITECTURE TRAINING

Expanded need for architectures and their significance in achieving defense of our nation results in the need for qualified architects

Therefore, we are confronted with questions:– Is there a pool of qualified architects?– What are the competencies of an architect?– Is there a core body of knowledge?– What education and training courses exist?

DoD– IT Architects Career Path–Architects Series

UNCLASSIFIED

UNCLASSIFIED

RECOMMENDED WAY AHEAD

Deliver an architect career plan Establish architecture specialties in Office

of Personnel Management (OPM) Formalize a competency framework Implement Certificates & Certification

across architecture specialties Work with academic and educational

institutions to enhance their curricula

UNCLASSIFIED

UNCLASSIFIED

ACCOMPLISHMENTS WHITE PAPER - Phase I: A Competency Framework

– Defines a path for a quality architecture workforce

– Provides collected data on the competencies of an architect

– https://www.us.army.mil/suite/doc/10757012

Architecture Education and Training DKO Site

OPM Job Family Standard Review

Clinger-Cohen Core Competency Review for Architecture

Delivered two Architecture Training Tutorials at 2008 EA Conference

UNCLASSIFIED

UNCLASSIFIED

DoD Information DoD Information

Sharing EnvironmentSharing Environment

Walt OkonChief Architect, DoD Information Sharing

Architecture & Interoperability Directorate Office of the DoD CIO/ASD NII

UNCLASSIFIED

UNCLASSIFIED

Complexities of Information Sharing

Northeast PowerBlackout

Counter Terrorism

Failed States (Haiti)

TerroristActions

Natural Disasters

WarfighterOperations

Coalition Operations

HumanitarianOperations

PandemicFlu

DoD is part of this complex, extended information sharing enterprise…

UNCLASSIFIED

UNCLASSIFIED

DoD Information Sharing EnvironmentDescription:

– Provide a DoD Information Sharing architecture and standards capability which will support cross-community, institutional approach to the sharing of information within DoD and can apply across Federal Departments, state, and local governments

– Provide architecture and engineering guidance for DoD Information Sharing Executive and DoD Information Sharing

– Provide PM-ISE DoD’s Shared Space architecture and standard guidance to enable cross-community sharing for identifying, planning, installing, and operating capabilities that will become the ISE.

UNCLASSIFIED

UNCLASSIFIED DoD Information Sharing Environment

FY08 Key Taskings:

– PM-ISE Chief Architect Roundtable and the CTISS Committee

– Design and deliver a CTISS Federated Standards Registry pilot

– Develop a DoD ISE Shared Space use case and concept capabilities with Net-Centric direction

– Partner with other ISE architects in the Federal Departments

– Partnership with DISA on analysis and engineering.

UNCLASSIFIED

UNCLASSIFIED

Bring It All TogetherBring It All TogetherDoD Enterprise Architecture Conference 2009

UNCLASSIFIED

UNCLASSIFIEDDoD Enterprise Architecture Conference 2009

DoD Enterprise Architecture Conference– All DoD Architecture Professionals– Only official Architecture Conference– Enterprise Architecture & Standards– Deliver Interoperability

1 – 5 June 2009; DoD Enterprise Architecture Conference 2009 in St Louis, MO – Deliverables

http://www.afei.org/brochure/9a05/index.cfm

UNCLASSIFIED

UNCLASSIFIED

Questions/Wrap-UpQuestions/Wrap-Up

walt.okon@osd.mil 703-607-0502

Walt OkonChief Architect, DoD Information Sharing

Enterprise Architecture & Standards Directorate Office of the DoD CIO/ASD NII

07 December 2008