UNCLASSIFIED AD NUMBER - apps.dtic.mil · UNCLASSIFIED AD NUMBER AD142815 NEW LIMITATION CHANGE TO...

26
UNCLASSIFIED AD NUMBER AD142815 NEW LIMITATION CHANGE TO Approved for public release, distribution unlimited FROM Distribution authorized to U.S. Gov't. agencies and their contractors; Administrative/Operational Use; JUN 1957. Other requests shall be referred to Naval Air Systems Command, Washington, DC 20362. AUTHORITY USNOSC ltr dtd 5 Sep 1969 THIS PAGE IS UNCLASSIFIED

Transcript of UNCLASSIFIED AD NUMBER - apps.dtic.mil · UNCLASSIFIED AD NUMBER AD142815 NEW LIMITATION CHANGE TO...

  • UNCLASSIFIED

    AD NUMBER

    AD142815

    NEW LIMITATION CHANGE

    TOApproved for public release, distributionunlimited

    FROMDistribution authorized to U.S. Gov't.agencies and their contractors;Administrative/Operational Use; JUN 1957.Other requests shall be referred to NavalAir Systems Command, Washington, DC 20362.

    AUTHORITY

    USNOSC ltr dtd 5 Sep 1969

    THIS PAGE IS UNCLASSIFIED

  • A 4

    12 w

    ow

    * fld'VWM or4 40W-mpw m"umm 4"F W (v~m'c~n nr;4C-nM, *PYWi -WZll CWMM iDAT

    (n~~~~~~~~ VI0*- g"llW lF.rr "ZAZ

    -7J^j DOCIJMEI W W3CK ENTo~t," U IYrm~ULILMRP YM'A

    ,wwmm OR2 -u* UP .)-

    ftu-J~U ' - -H .4,CLTI

    u~P WV, M L ~ W U AX fl LXLWP CL AT

    44 MA Wisiwj MLtMr *-'v ',~ i~ w%, =iP uYi 0

  • Ml All~

    f4 - _w

    WfId - or -rE.AOUA W^

    EAN V, -v-ARC

    2- Nt

    lof

    %* -FRNI9

    ftaop Cai-r-m

    teor N' U-00 L 3 Appove by

    J -n 97Hskl hpr

  • Departzry. o-t tko Jkhqgureau of Ckrdw"C,,Mtract "&d.1&2w0

    FDi WZZ-=l BY vz! 7- THE A,.NWTAR rFY-Wk.-r Rkw

    Tama lioeniuk

    Rsp'odwtiAAa in voiwld or ir. part is permitted for ar7 ?kvpoeof the United States Ooverzuwnt

    Hydro~naato LaboratryQaiorna Institute of Tecunoloy

    Nesadena C..3if a'k WiA

    RepwtI No. L-73.3 ApW*O"d hr

    June 1957 Ihtsmks hawio

  • %MW4jsi VWoped4 iti b AkboratOCy pasit. th drt, of

    ei~ft Of tA* dy=Aic coeffiints f l MI dsdCrIbig t orCO aMd

    moment reactiew on a aubmwget bo4 movin~g in water,, Tibme coeffiq~eaU

    'Uis the patltl 6wvivativs of moment (about, the yaw axis) vnd of

    ~ (in the horiscatl plirn "nd pewpWe-toual" to tko 1orituinsXi W4

    with respect to~ veloeity ar ! acceleration 40faponants in specified utreo.

    tioe. So long as the instlltanowus eagleb of attack e~amn and ac4*

    Offects are absect, thin COefficiOU hV bsCOnstgnt V&1W23.v A complete

    list of coefficients is given in We. WS) as wre defli2tione, sipn cork

    ventious Simi fOrmulas for making the coefficients nondinen iorial * The

    eight coefficients tabulated below awe thoue, pertiient to lateral trams.

    latias and rotatiOmiabout tha W e4 forboiof vltian:

    S oeffticient of Votga sameteivaiv

    V,3 virtual oMeni of iniertia cofficient (angular acceleration)

    N, cetficiuit, of static moment dervatt"

    virtoisl twment of inertia coefficient (lateral acceleration)coafficient of rotary tone derivativer

    Tf virtua inri coefficient (angulr aoceleration)

    T,' co*eiset of static force derivative

    yvlr+.Aawnetia coefficiatt (lateral accelraton~)

    j wji.ere the £wia Udcates; that the coefftcienti are in dimmniolesIt is Mis purposo of the e intal prop&* widrtak-c'n &zt 'is

    Utwrxtory to detemliw the nwmxe±ial valuss of the abom va#-nftti for

  • J r 2

    the %sic Fier missile (Fin. 1). Because of the r~ired differences

    in the Aperadmentl methods, however, the program was divided into two

    parts. This report &&3 only with Part 1, and is restricted to the

    following quantities z N -INIY-I TI#&Ate'~a miainr y v j~!' rM Vh iercmiaiN I -Nan d& Y uY'# .Ngiquantities wlbe thesi bject ofr V r Vanother report.

    ?he procedure used to obtain the dynamic mommn t coefficiento is based

    on the uasuresmt of the saplitude ratio and pnse argl* o,. the model while

    it is oscillated at a known frequency in the aov~ag atreaa of water. For

    this purpoee the Angulr Dynamic Balance was used, in conjunction with the

    High Speed Water Twmul at this Laboratoz7. A couplete discussion and des-

    oription ot the equipent is Siven in Ret. 2,* bt a brief *=ary is given

    here:

    The balance can be reparded as consisting of several separate fimction.

    a cponanta (Fig. 2). The first o- these is the platform - platform

    drive asseably. This uimt consists of a platform to which can be imparted

    a smal) angular oscillation of knowa,,amplituds and controllable frequen .

    To it is copled the splUih-modol asusAbl which is free to rotate on ban

    bearinp and which is pbovided with a Wtew sea to prevent leaWka. Of tunne

    watir to the outsid. The 4cupling member is a calibrated torsion spring

    of controllable stiffns. Two mirror-les system, one of vhich is carried

    by the driving platform and the other br the spindle, enable the observer to

    mearure the angular deflections of oach of thoso cononents with respect to

    ground. By projecting the imap of a Pulsing ight Source (tri ed by

    contacts on the drive assembly) the a ilier denec*tn at a gven in t

  • 3

    in the cyc) can be maurod. The oontactor body is rotated tbrough known

    a lainor nt and the deflection taken. IV plotting those data and

    by reproonting the observid motion in Fourer series, the aaplitwh and

    phae angles of the wn ts motion of both rivr and espindle can be

    deternind*

    A "U-4ontand lateral foare balenoe, using bonded 9traIn gae,

    seve as the center section of the nodel wwblyi This unit measures the

    insntanoua i ie force acting an the model and relates it to the iitan-P

    toous position of the driving platt o.

    T1ICAL ARL=28

    Up to this point the balance han been reprded as harmonic oscillator

    which permits complete ananysi of the motions of both the driving platform

    and of the spindle-odel. assmbly. Vy rwning the balance in air, and 1t

    performing tUe necaswar" computations, the spinridlo-odel assembly is found

    to possess a certain wmnt of inertia and little or no dwping with respect

    to ground. S ilad yr the internal (lateral force) balance shon that the

    center of ravity of the model "embly coincides very close3y with the axis

    of angular oscillation, This fact is Indicated tV the abumo of &

    measure riodic lateral for** in the pmenoe at the angtiw mtion.

    Thm the' tunnel Is #0led with ater which Is moving relative to the

    models the behavior of the modal is str l different. AnM4yhs of the

    motions of the platform and isindle ohws that the spindle Osese a larger

    Ness, coujled to ground Uwou* a eprini, and possessing a degree of dmping

    with reepect to ground, This spring can either aid or oppoe the model dis-w

    4 pla ient and the damping can be positive cr negative. In smlar fashion,

    the interAl balane ehms that periodic side forcos are, present which behaveEI

  • as though caused by oscillating a larger macs, coupled to ground by a

    spring, and also posessig smas amount of daping.

    The relationship between the inetantmaou8 forces and nmments exerted

    by the spindle on the model ard the resulting notion of the model can be

    given in terms of the effective pisioal parameters of the system and the

    aw lr ispllaeent P. oZ the models

    I.0o + B F 0. K (2)

    where the sign convention has been chosen to facilitate final expression of

    the desired b'rrokamic coefficients. In these equations

    a = total apparen mass of tht model

    b lateral force duping coefficient of model with respect to ground

    k - effective lateral spr'ing rate with respect to ground

    I = total effectiv moment of inertia of model in vater

    B = torsional damping moment coefficient of model

    K = effective torsional spring rate with respect to ground

    Thse apparent phyical properties of the model and model-spindle assembly

    awe a result of the tq trrnazi forces acting on the mode. For the amall

    oscillations exeouted by the modol and for the anf instantaneous angles of

    attack, the t roknaic reaotl on can be regarded an coa vising the sum of

    the indiv c al reactions arising from disp~.acment, valwity, and accelaratin

    in the direction of motion, Letting N equal the total bydronamic moment

    acting on the boy about the yaw axis and Y equal the total % o-n-c

    lateral force, then

    Mu+ N;16+V+ V + Hr + W (3)v vZ,

  • B\

    5

    and

    we subscripts indicate partial divaivmes in accordance with the list

    of syAbols on pp 13 and

    U V u velocity of bo axis relative to fl,4d at infinitr.

    r= angular velocity of model about the yaw axis.

    v V.U o compoernt of velocity of bo4" axis relative to fluidin the direction perpendicular to the loreitudinalaxis and in the horiostal plane.

    +v 2-U P component of acceleration of bt: relative to fluidin the direction pwpendioular to the longitudinaLaxis and in tA hrisontal plane.

    Since the bod in question possess rotation sysmetry, the following terms

    mest anish for oonstant u.

    Nu, N~i.9 Iii, andYeU .

    Equation (3) can therefore be rewritten in us

    N 0,+ (Nr - N U) 00 - Nv U

    a.(Y~ U) 0 Y. Up (14)' iP,+ r v o v 0

    For tho present casen, the center of Oravity of the test boc r w very nearly

    at the center of rotation, so that all side force reactiors were hydro ynaxic

    in origin, r

    (5)

    4sop the mnt reaction on the spindle due to dampUW and displacement in

    air was zero; therefore the only nonky&'oe'nAxic rsaction mu due to the

    mvwmt of inertia of the spindlo.noel e.sal, or

  • N" bo " ii (6) &

    so that by cubining trnM i (1), (2) and (4i), and substituting in()

    and (6), the bhidotmanic coefficients -"n be i4emtified with the effective

    physical quantities characUistic of vibrating mis s sms:

    Y" b= (Y -Y U) k = -T Ur r VV(7) .5

    If- j B= (N NU) 1 0. NvU

    where U is the constant relative fluid velocity at a great dist ,e from

    the botV

    The axperiuental problem then reduces to one of finding the numerical

    values of these effective p17sical constants, a, k, If, B, and K, t

    whatever meara available. The 4naoc blanc and its w cessci'y instru-

    mentation provide th, aeas. If the equations of motion for the system

    are formulatcd, the following pair of equations is obtained:

    + Bs . Kd(P 02P) . o

    (8)

    I P + B Po + K Ks 4

    where the syabol* are as defined on page 12 and as shown in, the equivalent

    linear analogy of the moment measuring apparatus in Fig. 2. From these ex-

    pressions can be obtained the stead-state solation

    -1 2 K~K 2 i-s + -OW +m %iDB

    K. Ks Ice5"I I

    S, co(2 - 1) si 2"L(9)

  • which redosa to

    V J V

    wtmm term aoc i the negligible quantities Io and B. are dropped*

    The real part of this equation identifies the in-phase component and

    Wh :lmglna'y part identifies the quadrature component. From this ex-

    pjwssim the effect.ve pbpical constanta I, B, and K, can be found,

    &ceo?'dng to the method to be described later. Similarly, the expreision

    Fr~% +'d2 + " 'o "B

    LMK+ iWAMDW L(,.82) in(61 82)jJ L

    V ~rst reduces to (1o)

    .. coo (8 2) - ± sinl (68 +E coo] (4O52) sin 0

    amd cam be solved to sive the amplitude and phase angle of the model in ter=

    o inasurabis quantities. This infc-ation Is required for subsequent evalu-

    &tion of the lateral forces mea wed by the internal strain gpo balance

    a;omb1 xince, with the present setup, the internal balance actuafl ,

    UArw Plaea angle ralative to the otion of the driving platform. The

  • 4" . .. .. - , - - -- -.--- -, r : ,,' _ :¥.r/fL _ +,-- .- ," .; --- -' . . .. - " -.--- - , K

    S

    l teral force it related to the efective yyii c oontant, a b# and

    k, -trough the sa-u.tae relation

    vj co 2) +±±L j= [z .2.± A. iihere F iv the peak valve of the lateral tioe and 6 is the phue agle of

    this force relative to the notion of the model. -

    RLDUCTIOK AMD AMMIS CP U

    kqUation 9 is sen to be a aoplex expression of the ftam

    - . -+ d (12)a+ib

    (

    hich can be rationalized to yield

    o da -,2- d2 and b--2+ (13)

    where

    b nB

    plting a&- against w2(Fig. 3) and wmesuing the slope (t/1 ) and

  • y~ntrcpt(i + NK)two of the eqi4 valet #lyascal constants are found

    Vi

    it tam of the knmw spirdl spring rate* Salryif b is plotted

    aTi t c (Fig. 4) the slopS of the reaulting 31 is equal to WK.

    hA~dAO trstSint, of the latexWfI foras sc atloa (11) in Pigs. 5 and6

    holade the quantities a. b , and kf. Uwe equivalent pyiwa parmeters

    are then equated to the appropriate J~droc~amic cost fioientU acowrding to

    lq. (7) and mmian siowaliseds as indicated in Ref. *1I The romultdiv,

    c~zmc oefficients haVe beft Plotted aiwt RqnOld nuller in Fiat. 7

    to 12. The use of Renolds nber as JW-siailituds parameter does not

    iqply an a jwrif judgent that visoitr effects awe paramount, in deter.

    miin the magnituds of than coefficient**. Indeed, for the experimental

    SetUPaaibe foar this tu*, whoe the model size and flid viscosity

    were fied, th Re~ndSd muber obmp. indicates only a caaW in velocity.

    The aff ect of the presence of the modl suppot spindle ad asxnd e

    shield was estimated tr the impg method. That.is, sup- ~Wtar rum we

    auk with a dwW support isptindl shield on the side of the model opposite

    the rel support spindl* and shield. This nuE did not touch the moel

    The dita points taken with this lagc in place as indicated W solid sym.

    bolae in the final crve It is assumed that the proseoe of the dMw

    shield produces the sa m effect as the original fmctoa spindle and

    spindle held hence the fina cm is tan to be dplaced an amount,

    Wa to the difference beaon the origina, rums ad the iage rns, and

    in the direction of the origi l rnms. In sam cases the reence of the

    ime strut, hA no effect on the values of the coefficiets; for these no

    imaed runs wo plotted.

  • 10

    83 WARY CF DBILTS

    (1) Ni, virtual Mmt of e coffiient (Fig. 7):

    This coefficient is neary indepenzI"t of wiocity, a predicted

    kV perfect fluid theory, and sows little wr no se itivity to the presence

    of the support .

    (2) N , CoefOfciet of Static kmwt Derivative (ng. 8)l

    This coefficient is a Measure of the aceent compoent due to

    velocity ppeicular to the lO~gitudlual bocb' axis ror small amgles

    of yaw thi ie sen to be identical to the static moment rate, d Cabk

    and for this reaso it serves as a good check on the experimntal and cam-

    putational proCOdur. The areeimnt betwen the values reported in Fig. 8

    and those reported in Ref. (3) arevery good# even as to the effect of the

    presence of the support spindl&.

    (3) N,-R; o ment c 9 )t (i. ),

    Actual1y a linear cobination of the coefficient of Rotary Momnt

    Derivative and the Virtual Moment of Lurtia Coefficient (to lateral

    acceleration), cannot be resolved withoA furtber experixents, which are

    to be coduted at a later tii.

    (4) Yi ', Virtual Inertia Coefficient (anglar acceleratiom) (Fig. 10):

    This quantity is rrtgigibly mal in tw ;resece of the pondarable

    value of YT"

    (5) YV' Coefficient of Static Force Derivative (Fg, 11):

    The analog to itea (2) above, can e idwtijfed with the slope of

    the static lift coefficient curv 0 CL/da found tV conjntitna static

    balance mas nt As with ite (2), the aVpement with previous static

  • 11

    aeoi~emust (Ref. 3) 1. @xcef.unt.

    (6) t T1 Combined Lateral rorce Coeffilent (ig. 12)x

    As with item 3) this coefficient aamot be ccmpletey

    auaysed until the Becond phase of this iinestigation :is a td.

  • C -

    LIIT CF $!D(

    Th Wtion of the test boy it rsatricted to to plM of y b The IF-

    bole used to describe thi sotion. and ,the asociated IVc rolU msa on

    tho boV are in the greater part dentical to those rwo'nded in the ?echR.

    nidal and Research Bulletin 1. 1-5 of the Society of lkawm Architects and

    Narine En4inoers titled "Noen wlatwu* fcr Veating the Lotion of a Butmared

    BAY(r throug a Fluid", These symbols re mrked with an asterisk(*) in the

    follwing lst.

    The coefficient. have been made non-dImn iosal in accorftw with p ;-

    oecren outlined in the ab publication. DiensiaoleS qUantit* a&r

    primed all other quantities are in the pomd-foot-second ystem of units.

    A cross seotion area or *Aotl

    Aos A:L* A 2 pe a L -~ au1 t action of bo*, suppait spindleand drive platfors

    b d coefficient in Zq. (1)

    B torsional deqing coefficient in Sq, (2)Be torsioal dauping rate of spindle seal

    d dimeter of model

    peak maprtude of lateral force in the horivntal plane

    I= Ib + It total effective wm nt of inertia of model in water (Eq. (2))

    1 b m of inertia of model

    I apparent uwmt of inrtia of model assembly dueto by*odimio roactione

    I s mment of inertia of model-support spindle

    k efiaetivw sprir4 rate dm to tdron&a ic reactions (Eq* (1))

    K eff.ev1w txsorial spring rate due to b4*ocrnaxic reactions (Eq.2)

    Kd torsx=l sprinp rate of driv sW ing ich cowples thedriving platfow to the spindl -modol assembl

    Ks torsimal spring rat of odl aupport spindle

    'a apparont *Aix of moda~l d t ~o kwdrobr~z4udro~adlom (Ev f-1))

  • 13

    LM tr S!D (oont'd)

    * JRydo!mlc moment acting an~ tba moftl

    N, N ,oimnt on bo4r supplied to support spindle

    * N' /' A4/U) coefoient of rotary mment dwiatv*v4Is

    * I.'(3/2p 3) virtu&, =ot of ioa'Viz coeffcientN- Ii#' 12~ (angular acce eltioii}

    S = , (1/ U) coefficient of satic moment derivative

    * N,, NjI (1/24?) vitu a m ent Of inwtia Coeffricient(lateral acceleration)

    ra aula vvlocity about the $w axi

    * Vvelocity of bo axle relative to fluid at itftntt

    u om0t of elacity of bomb axi relative to fluid

    in the direotion pral l to the l t o iUna axis

    v at of V lOof bor a3d relativ to- Mid

    in the direcon perpendcular to the longitudinalaxis and in the hwlsatal plan

    Y ~c~ai lateral force acting on the model

    T a Y latutl faree on the nodal supplied tb the support spindls

    *Y r ' (1/pAdu) coefficient of rotay force derivative

    * , (1/M) virtual net a eoeffiosnt (angular aoceleration)

    Y I? (2/2pAU) coefficient of static force derivative

    T+ 1.'s (1/2pMd) virtual inertia, coefficient (3.atweral acceleration)

    Pot P3. 02 ag-lar dIsp LA-mnt about the ymw ai of the model,spindle, and &riv p~Latfor

    $o' 8is 82 phan costant of the motion of the model, spindle, anddriw platform

    a f ph"* angl of the Iate1 force relative to model motion

    P -s2 dcnsir or =4aIp

    asz 2"rf eircu~i frequsnty; f = frequency in cycles pr owand

  • LIST (W REFNWMKS

    1. Kicewiuk, Ta", "Dyramic Coefficienits of the Uk-13 Tmreda'6 ,Clifonia nstitut* of Tecbmoo~, VI oc~aics LaboratorYReport No* E -, 12*200 April 1957

    2. St&U'ksap Jobn Asp "Manurment- of DyrAmic Coefficients OfEflipaids", California Institute of Technoqo amodnmicaLabot'to:7 BapWI oat, z. - 35.149 Septesbs 1956

    3* Xeren Re 1., "Sttic Foce Coefficients of the BasicFirmer 1wissile in fully Afetted Flow", California Instituteof Techwooy, Uydr*muics Laboratory. Report 9 73.2,Jura 11957.

  • I _ __ _ -o

    r-

    C9C

    Fig. I Important geometrical dimensions of the Basic Finner missile.

    0 0

    I K

    IIII

    L0000 b n f --

    DRIVING PLATFORM SUPPORT SPINDLE MOOEt.

    K5 TORSIONAL SPRiNG RATE 1Ff SPiNDC/3 ./J D SV4.ACEMENT OF PLATFORM, SPINDLE, MODELB$~ TORSIONAL DAMPING RATE OF SPIND)LE SEAL A,* A, A0 iWO ,u~M AMPLITUJDE OF PLATFORM, SPINDOLEMCOELIs$ MOMENT OF INERTIA OF SuPPORT SPINDLE hrS, & o Ft CONSTANT OF PLATFORM, SPINDLEMOOELI b MOMENT OF INERTIA OF MODELIl APPARENT MOMENT OF lNERTIA -A, SIN (wt-6,1X EFFECTiiE TORS40NAL SPRING RATE OuE 10 -A SIN (wit -hi

    HY0PODfNAMiC REACTIONS LoXg$Nit-o8 EFFECTIVE TORSION DAMPING RATE DuE To

    ,H-YRODYNAMIC REACTIONS.

    Fig. 2 - Schematic diagram of dynamic blance driving-platform nti

    * moment measuring components.

  • -0 '4 Mh C . 45-t' FO %'S

    40

    FeC

    10 20 0 40 50 bO60 4

    SQUIAE OF FRECKUENCY IN

    Fig. 3 -Moment data reduction plot: In-phase component(real part Eq. 9).

    7 .4 j LEGEND JI_'0 NO IMAGE SHIELD,9-FINS-

    0*WITH IMAGE SH-IELED. 90- FINS1)( NO IMAGE SH4IELD, 45- FINS

    t~10

    .~t2

    FRE~uEPNCYv N(yCLSECOND,

    Fig, 4 -Moment data reduction plot, Quadrature component(imaginary part Eq. )

  • 0!0-, , vkE0iTv 30 P5i __ _

    -.. - _ _ - -. ,: - , - ... ........-.. 4

    IEI

    0 -

    E* _____20

    o - O MAT 5MAGILD, 90" FN5_0 W AGE h40LD, 450 FiN5

    0 10 20 30 40 o0 90 100

    SQUAI OF FREQUENCY IN I

    Fig. 5 - Lateral force data reduction plot: In-phase component(real part Eq. H). -

  • 20 -

    1-. 10.zLL. 0

    70-

    6 0z

    0t- 50

    30~SOLID YWIOL INDICATES IMAGE RUN30 DSED. LI1N INDICATES VLUE OF COEFFICIENT

    I-- 0 CORRECTED FOR SUPPORT SPINDLE SHIELO.IX

    > 0

    12 3 4 5 6 7 a 9 10

    REYNOLDS NUMBER x 10~

    Fig. 7 *Virtual moment of in~ertia coefficient (angular acceleration)as a function of Reynolds number.

    Ujj

    20.-

    0

    0 10___ __ _

    z SOLID SYt, 01. IND ICATES AME RUN

    WU DAO, J INDICATES VALUE OF COEFICIENTCOF "C; SUPORTSPP',X'E SHIELD

    Fi.8 Cefcefofsaimoetdrvtvasafunction of

    Reynods nmber

  • 24

    200z

    LL

    w 'w

    140--

    Z 120

    z40

    2o-O 1,, .. .

    2 - 4; 5 6 7 S 9 10

    REYNOLDS NUM8ER x I0 "

    Fig. 9 - Combined moment coefficient as a function of Reynolds number.

    I- o

    S 60-_

    4 0

    0 0 0

    -20

    21 a 3 4 5 6 7 P 9 r)REYTJOLD NIMKR x 10'4

    Fig. 1 - Virtual inertia coefficient (angular acceleration) as afunction of Reynolds number.

  • r 'a -- -- - - -- -

    I ' '~24

    14-

    12

    3 4 5 6 '7 8 9 10REYNOLDS NUMBER x 10-4

    Fig. 11 - Cuefficient of static force derivative as a functionof Reynolds number.

    I

    100 . . ..

    90I-

    . 0

    0, 60

    40

    Z 30-1

    20

    tOI

    2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10

    REYNOLDS NUMBER x I0"'

    Fig. 12 - Combined lateral force ccefficient as a functionof Reynolds number.

  • DISTRIBUTION LIST

    Copy Noj

    1-4 Chief, Bureau of Ordnance, Navy Dept., Washington I, D0 C.Attn: Code ReO-3

    5S-8 Chief, Bureau at Or~ance, Navy Dept., Washington 25, D. C.Attn. Code iU. .

    9-10 Chief, Bureau of Ordnance, Navy Dept., Washington 25, D. C.Attn: Code Ad3

    11-13 Ciief, Bureau of Aeronautics. Navy Dept., Washington Z5, D. C.

    14-18 Chief, Bureau of Ships, Navy Dept., Washington 23, D. C.

    19-21 Chief. Office of Naval Research, Navy Dept.. Washington 25, D. C.Attn: Code 438

    zz Commanding Officer, Cffice of Naval Research Branch Office,1030 East Green Street, Pasadena 1, California

    23-24 Commanding Officer and Director, David Taylor Model Basin,Washington 7, D. C.

    25-26 Commanding Officer. U. S. Naval Underwater Ordnance Station,Newport, Rhode Island

    27-28 Commander, U. S. Naval Crdnance Laboratory. White (bk,Silver Spring, Maryland

    29-30 Commander, U. S. Naval Ordnance Test Station, Pasadena,California

    31 Commander, U. S. Naval Ordnance Test Station, China Lake,California

    32 Director, Experimental Towing Tank, Stevens Institute ofTechnology, via: Bureau of Aeronautics Representativec/o Bendix Aviation Corp., Eclipse-Pioneer Division,Teterboro. New Jersey

    33 DMsector, Ordnance Research Laboratory, Pennsylvanla StateUniversity, University Park, Pennsylvania

    34 Alden Hydraulic Laboratory, Worcester Polytechnic Institute,Worcester. Mass.. via: Inspector of Naval Material,495 Summer Street, Boston 10, Mass.

    35 -36 Librarian, U. S. Nava! Postgraduate School, Monterey, Calif.

  • DISTRIBUTION LZST (cont'd)

    ~No.

    37-46 British Joint Services Mission, Navy Staff, via: Chief, Bureauof Ordnance, Navy Dept., Washington 25, D. C.,Attn: Code Ads

    47-49 Commander, U. S. Naval Proving Ground, Dahigren, Virginia

    S0-S1 National Advisory Committee for Aeronautics, Langley MemorialAeronautical Laboratory, Langley Field, Virginia

    52 Natioial Advisory Committee for Aeronautics, Lewis Fligh.Propulsion Lab., Cleveland Airport, Cleveland, Ohio

    53 Director, National Advisory Committee for Aeronautics,151Z H Street, N. W., Washington 25, D. C.

    S4 Director, Nattona. , tisory Committee for Aeronautics, AmesLaboratory, Moffett Field, California

    55-S6 Commander, Air Research and Development Command, PostOffice Box 1395, Baltimore 3, Maryland

    57 ASTIA Reference Center, Technical Information Division,Library of Congress, Washington 25, D. C.

    SB-63 Director, Armed Services Technical Information Agency,Documents Service Center, Knott Building, Dayton 2,Ohio. Attn: DSC-SA