UK Health Care Task Force
description
Transcript of UK Health Care Task Force
![Page 1: UK Health Care Task Force](https://reader036.fdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022062500/56815869550346895dc5c7a9/html5/thumbnails/1.jpg)
UK Health Care Task Force
Prevention and Wellness as a Cost Containment ComponentAugust 2001
![Page 2: UK Health Care Task Force](https://reader036.fdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022062500/56815869550346895dc5c7a9/html5/thumbnails/2.jpg)
Objectives
Identify the opportunity for savings through prevention and wellnessIdentify strategies that can be employed to capture these savingsDiscuss critical design components of successful program implementationCurrent UK status
![Page 3: UK Health Care Task Force](https://reader036.fdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022062500/56815869550346895dc5c7a9/html5/thumbnails/3.jpg)
Primary area of focus
High Risk/Behavioral Based Programming – health improvement on a population basisMedical Consumerism/Self-Care – addressing the inappropriate emergency type utilizationOther suggested strategies – such as after-care/recurrence prevention, primary prevention etc.
![Page 4: UK Health Care Task Force](https://reader036.fdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022062500/56815869550346895dc5c7a9/html5/thumbnails/4.jpg)
50%
20%
20%
10%
Lifestyle
Environment
Biology
Health Services
Lifestyle Accounts for 50% of Deaths
Source: CDC (1980)
Big Picture
![Page 5: UK Health Care Task Force](https://reader036.fdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022062500/56815869550346895dc5c7a9/html5/thumbnails/5.jpg)
High Risk Employees Cost More
Impact on Individual Health Care Costs:High versus Lower-Risk Employees
70.2%
46.3%
34.8%
21.4% 19.7%14.5% 11.7% 10.4%
-50%
-25%
0%
25%
50%
75%
100%D
epre
ssio
n
Stre
ss
Glu
cose
Wei
ght
Toba
cco-
Past
Toba
cco
Blo
odPr
essu
re
Exer
cise
Perc
ent
Individuals at high risk for depression have 70.2% higher costs than those at lower risk
Individuals at high risk for depression have 70.2% higher costs than those at lower risk
Source: Goetzel et al. (1998)
![Page 6: UK Health Care Task Force](https://reader036.fdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022062500/56815869550346895dc5c7a9/html5/thumbnails/6.jpg)
Bottom LineMillions Can Be Saved
$0
$2
$4
$6
$8
$10
Projecting Medical Care Cost Increases Using Four Scenarios of Lifestyle Risk
Rates
Source: Leutzinger et al. (AJHP 2000) *1998 Dollars
Program holds risks
constant
Program reduces
risks 0.1%/yr
Program reduces
risks 1%/yr
No program w/ current risk
trends
Co
st(i
n
Mil
lio
ns*
)
$9.96$8.85
$7.89
$2.22
$7.74 Million Saved/Year
$7.74 Million Saved/Year
![Page 7: UK Health Care Task Force](https://reader036.fdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022062500/56815869550346895dc5c7a9/html5/thumbnails/7.jpg)
So what does it cost UK?
Three methodologies– By # risks– By type of risk – over 5 years– By type of risk – 1 year
![Page 8: UK Health Care Task Force](https://reader036.fdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022062500/56815869550346895dc5c7a9/html5/thumbnails/8.jpg)
So what does it cost UK?
Health BehaviorsCosts associated with high risks are estimated to
be between $8 - $12 million dollars annually
![Page 9: UK Health Care Task Force](https://reader036.fdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022062500/56815869550346895dc5c7a9/html5/thumbnails/9.jpg)
So what does it cost UK?
Inappropriate UtilizationHard to quantify at this point as there was no time to collect plan specific data in this areaIt is know that the state avg. ED utilization is higher than the national averageAccess to care may play a factor here at UK
![Page 10: UK Health Care Task Force](https://reader036.fdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022062500/56815869550346895dc5c7a9/html5/thumbnails/10.jpg)
So what does it cost UK?
Primary prevention/after-careLack of attention to after-care/recurrence prevention could have significant impact upon experience levelsAccess to primary prevention within the state is below average for mammography screening, PAP smears and eye exams for diabeticsNo time to collect plan specific data in this area
![Page 11: UK Health Care Task Force](https://reader036.fdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022062500/56815869550346895dc5c7a9/html5/thumbnails/11.jpg)
Objectives
Identify the opportunity for savings through prevention and wellness
Identify strategies that can be employed to capture these savingsDiscuss critical design components of successful program implementationCurrent UK status
![Page 12: UK Health Care Task Force](https://reader036.fdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022062500/56815869550346895dc5c7a9/html5/thumbnails/12.jpg)
Comprehensive Programs Have Positive ROI
HealthPromotion
Short-Term Long-Term
$3-$83-5 Years
$2-$51st Year
DemandManagement
![Page 13: UK Health Care Task Force](https://reader036.fdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022062500/56815869550346895dc5c7a9/html5/thumbnails/13.jpg)
Demand Management:Medical Consumerism
Designed to educate and provide resources to individuals so that they best use the health care resourceMost typically booklets, telephonic and/or web basedHigh training necessary
![Page 14: UK Health Care Task Force](https://reader036.fdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022062500/56815869550346895dc5c7a9/html5/thumbnails/14.jpg)
What does the data say?
37% of adults and 32% of children in Ky. use the ER every 6 monthsAvg. number of ED visits in state is higher than national average
![Page 15: UK Health Care Task Force](https://reader036.fdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022062500/56815869550346895dc5c7a9/html5/thumbnails/15.jpg)
Objectives
Identify the opportunity for savings through prevention and wellness
Identify strategies that can be employed to capture these savingsDiscuss critical design components of successful program implementationCurrent UK status
![Page 16: UK Health Care Task Force](https://reader036.fdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022062500/56815869550346895dc5c7a9/html5/thumbnails/16.jpg)
Comprehensive Programs Have Positive ROI
HealthPromotion
Short-Term Long-Term
$3-$83-5 Years
$2-$51st Year
DemandManagement
![Page 17: UK Health Care Task Force](https://reader036.fdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022062500/56815869550346895dc5c7a9/html5/thumbnails/17.jpg)
Health Promotion/Risk Reduction
Geared towards broad based population health improvementAddresses modifiable health behaviorsUK has the perfect situation to establish programming and is moving in this direction
![Page 18: UK Health Care Task Force](https://reader036.fdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022062500/56815869550346895dc5c7a9/html5/thumbnails/18.jpg)
Health Promotion/Risk Reduction
Prevalence – the percentage of the population in which these conditions exist as determined by UKHMO satisfaction surveys and/or statistics for the National Center for Health Statistics
Cost – determined through application of research data comparing symptomatic plan members cost to asymptomatic plan members cost
![Page 19: UK Health Care Task Force](https://reader036.fdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022062500/56815869550346895dc5c7a9/html5/thumbnails/19.jpg)
Prevalence
UKHMO Survey Data
Depression – 2.1%Elev. Glucose – 5.3%HBP – 20.8%Heart Disease – 2.8%
National/KY Health
Data
Stress – 18.5%Excess Weight – 20%Sedentary - 32%Tobacco – 20%
![Page 20: UK Health Care Task Force](https://reader036.fdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022062500/56815869550346895dc5c7a9/html5/thumbnails/20.jpg)
UKHMO Prevalence Rates
Risk Area Prevalence # in planDepression 2.10% 164Elevated Glucose 5.30% 413HBP 20.80% 1,622Heart Disease 2.80% 218Stress 18.50% 1,443Extreme Weight 20.00% 1,560Sedentary 32.00% 2,496Tobacco 20.00% 1,560
![Page 21: UK Health Care Task Force](https://reader036.fdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022062500/56815869550346895dc5c7a9/html5/thumbnails/21.jpg)
Cost
Avg. cost of study plan participant was $1,712.Additional or excess cost was clearly associated with the presence of lifestyle related illness and/or risk factors.Results were confirmed both long and short term.
![Page 22: UK Health Care Task Force](https://reader036.fdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022062500/56815869550346895dc5c7a9/html5/thumbnails/22.jpg)
CostRisk Area Annual CostExcess CostAverage Cost $1,712 $0Risk free $1,166 -$546Depression $2,713 $1,001Stress $2,212 $500Elevated Glucose $2,423 $711Extreme Weight $2,222 $510HBP $2,142 $430Sedenatry $2,064 $352Tobacco Use $1,967 $255Heart Disease $4,083 $2,371
![Page 23: UK Health Care Task Force](https://reader036.fdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022062500/56815869550346895dc5c7a9/html5/thumbnails/23.jpg)
Cost to UKHMO
Risk Area # in plan Excess CostAverage Cost 0 $0Depression 164 $164,164Stress 1,443 $721,500Elevated Glucose 413 $293,643Extreme Weight 1,560 $795,600HBP 1,622 $697,460Sedenatry 2,496 $878,592Tobacco Use 1,560 $397,800Heart Disease 218 $516,878
![Page 24: UK Health Care Task Force](https://reader036.fdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022062500/56815869550346895dc5c7a9/html5/thumbnails/24.jpg)
Financial Results
Reduced reliance on pharmaceuticalsDecreased experienceAnnual savings of $8 - $12 million dollars annually (once completely implemented)
![Page 25: UK Health Care Task Force](https://reader036.fdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022062500/56815869550346895dc5c7a9/html5/thumbnails/25.jpg)
Objectives
Identify the opportunity for savings through prevention and wellnessIdentify strategies that can be employed to capture these savings
Discuss critical design components of successful program implementationCurrent UK status
![Page 26: UK Health Care Task Force](https://reader036.fdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022062500/56815869550346895dc5c7a9/html5/thumbnails/26.jpg)
Behaviorally stagedFocus on maintenance and reinforcementProgram beyond risk or disease specificTailored to health and safety riskIncentives for participation
Principles of Effective Program Design
Source: Serxner (in press)
![Page 27: UK Health Care Task Force](https://reader036.fdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022062500/56815869550346895dc5c7a9/html5/thumbnails/27.jpg)
Repeated contactsVaried formatsPersonalizationLow cost & portableEasy to administerEmphasis on health and productivity
Principles of Effective Program Design
Source: Serxner (in press)
![Page 28: UK Health Care Task Force](https://reader036.fdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022062500/56815869550346895dc5c7a9/html5/thumbnails/28.jpg)
Multiple distribution channelsBuilt in program evaluationLong-term orientationIntegrated with Safety, Occupational Health, EAP, and TrainingVisible management support
Principles of Effective Program Design
Source: Serxner (in press)
![Page 29: UK Health Care Task Force](https://reader036.fdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022062500/56815869550346895dc5c7a9/html5/thumbnails/29.jpg)
Objectives
Identify the opportunity for savings through prevention and wellnessIdentify strategies that can be employed to capture these savingsDiscuss critical design components of successful program implementation
Current UK status
![Page 30: UK Health Care Task Force](https://reader036.fdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022062500/56815869550346895dc5c7a9/html5/thumbnails/30.jpg)
UK Status
UK has taken steps to implement comprehensive programPro-active partnership between UKHMO, UK Health Plans and UK WellnessBe Health Improvement Plan (Be H.I.P)Needs greater emphasis and integration
![Page 31: UK Health Care Task Force](https://reader036.fdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022062500/56815869550346895dc5c7a9/html5/thumbnails/31.jpg)
Primary area of focus
High Risk/Behavioral Based Programming – health improvement on a population basisMedical Consumerism/Self-Care – addressing the inappropriate emergency type utilizationOther suggested strategies – such as after-care/recurrence prevention, primary prevention etc.
![Page 32: UK Health Care Task Force](https://reader036.fdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022062500/56815869550346895dc5c7a9/html5/thumbnails/32.jpg)
After-care prevention
Cardiac RehabilitationComplications from diabetesCancer Screenings
There is a general lack of emphasis on prevention and of recurrence, which is arguably as
important as occurrence
![Page 33: UK Health Care Task Force](https://reader036.fdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022062500/56815869550346895dc5c7a9/html5/thumbnails/33.jpg)
After-care/prevention (cont.)
Cardiac Rehabilitation – KY statistics fall nearly 25% below national average in beta-blocker prescription.Diabetes - KY below avg. on eye exams annually for diabetics.Cancer Screenings - KY below average in annual cervical cancer screens and mammograms
![Page 34: UK Health Care Task Force](https://reader036.fdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022062500/56815869550346895dc5c7a9/html5/thumbnails/34.jpg)
To achieve impact
Comprehensive structure and vision for the medical plan which includes these strategiesContinued integration with providersEnhanced employee communications/educationCommitment and resources
![Page 35: UK Health Care Task Force](https://reader036.fdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022062500/56815869550346895dc5c7a9/html5/thumbnails/35.jpg)
Aldana SG. Financial impact of worksite health promotion and methodological quality of the evidence. Art of Health Promotion 1998; 2(1):1-8.
Anderson DR, Whitmer RW, Goetzel RZ, Ozminkowski RJ, Wasserman J, Serxner SA. The relationship between modifiable health risks and group-level health care expenditures. American Journal of Health Promotion 2000; September/October: 45-52. Burton WN, Conti DJ, Chen CY, Schultz AB, Edington DW. The role of health risk factors and disease on worker productivity. Journal of Occupational and Environmental Medicine 1999; 41(10): 863-877.Edington DW, Yen LT, Witting P. The financial impact of changes in personal health practices. Journal of Occupational and Environmental Medicine 1997; 39(11): 1037-1047.Fries JF, Harrington H, Edwards R, Kent LA, Richardson N. Randomized Controlled Trial of Cost Reductions from a Health Education Program: The California Public Employees’ Retirement System (PERS) Study. American Journal of Health Promotion 1994; 8(3): 216-223.Goetzel RZ, Juday TR, Ozminkowski RJ. A systematic review of return-on-investment studies of corporate health and productivity management initiatives. AWHP’s Worksite Health 1999 (Summer); 12-21.Gold DB, Anderson DA, Serxner, S. Impact of a telephone-based intervention on the reduction of health risks. American Journal of Health Promotion 2000; Nov/Dec: 97-106.
References
![Page 36: UK Health Care Task Force](https://reader036.fdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022062500/56815869550346895dc5c7a9/html5/thumbnails/36.jpg)
Leutzinger JA, Ozminkowski RJ, Dunn RL, Goetzel RZ, Richling DE, Stewart M, Whitmer RW. Projecting future medical care cots using four scenarios of lifestyle risk rates. American Journal of Health Promotion 2000; 15(1): 35-44.Ozminkowski RJ, Dunn RL, Goetzel RZ, Canior RI, Murnane J, Harrison M. A return on investment evaluation of the Citibank, N.A., health management program. American Journal of Health Promotion 1999; 14: 31-43.Pelletier KR. A review and analysis of the clinical and cost-effectiveness studies of comprehensive health promotion and disease management programs at the worksite: 1995-1998 update (IV). American Journal of Health Promotion 1999; 13:333-345.Serxner SA. Practical Considerations for Design and Evaluation of Health Promotion Programs in the Workplace. Disease Management and Health Outcomes (in press). Serxner SA, Gold DB, Anderson DR, & Williams, D. The impact of a worksite health promotion program on short-term disability usage. Journal of Occupational and Environmental Medicine 2001; 43(1): 25-29.US Department of Health and Human Services (1980) Ten leading causes of death in the United States. Atlanta: Center for Disease Control, July.Wood EA, Olmstead GW, Craig JL. An evaluation of lifestyle risk factors and absenteeism after two years in a worksite health promotion programs. American Journal of Health Promotion 1989; 4(2): 128-113.
References
![Page 37: UK Health Care Task Force](https://reader036.fdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022062500/56815869550346895dc5c7a9/html5/thumbnails/37.jpg)
UK Health Care Task Force
Prevention and Wellness as a Cost Containment ComponentAugust 2001