ufone
-
Upload
bilal-ahmad -
Category
Documents
-
view
278 -
download
8
Transcript of ufone
Impact of Competitor on Brand Equity in Telecommunication
PREFACE
This report reviews the marketing of Ufone, the second largest telecom company
in Pakistan. We give a brief history of the company and tell about the
achievements and growths of Ufone. It put light on the whole organization
specifically its marketing department and the activities ongoing in its marketing
department. These activities include two of its major components i.e. Sales
Promotion and Advertising. These two are the main topics of this report which we
have discussed in the depths of the company’s strategies and functioning. Further
we review Ufone’s strengths, weaknesses, Opportunities and Threats (SWOT
Analysis). In the end we give the future plans of Ufone and conclude with our
views and suggestions for Ufone.
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
1
Impact of Competitor on Brand Equity in Telecommunication
This project has been undertaken in order to highlight the Human Resource Practices of Ufone
´.Its all about YOU its all about Ufone a company very highly spoken of these days. A company
paying more attention to its customer’s delights rather then the customer’s satisfaction. Ufone is
accompany starting from scratch and has shown utmost performance in the last four years. Ufone
owes its success to its employees believing that providing employees with job satisfaction,
motivates them to work hard and provide better results. Proper planning is Ufone’s strongest
point; all the products that they have launched so far are backed by wise strategies with proper
market research and massive advertisement campaigns. Decisions are taken at top level with
some participation from the lower levels showing that they do comprehend the worth of Group
decision-making. However goal setting is a procedure dedicated to only the top management.
Working on newer technologies is a specialty of ufone.
2
Impact of Competitor on Brand Equity in Telecommunication
INTRODUCTION
The company commenced its operations under the brand name of Ufone from Islamabad on
January 29 2001. Ufone expanded its coverage and has added new cities and highways to its
coverage network. After the privatization of PTCL, Ufone is now owned by Etisalat. During the
year, as a consequence of PTCL’s privatization, 26% of its shares were acquired by Emirates
Telecommunication Corporation (Etisalat). Being part of PTCL, the management of Ufone has
also been handed over to Etisalat. During the years, Ufone continued on the path to success. The
Company further expanded its coverage and has added new cities and highways. Ufone has
network coverage in more than 5885 locations and across all major highways of the country.
During the year Ufone adopted the policy of simplified tariffs with no hidden charges, which
resulted in positive impacts on the usage trends of subscribers as well as total subscriber base,
which has increased to 19.4 million. Ufone currently caters for International Roaming to more
than 230 live operators in more than 130 countries and introduced International roaming facility
for Prepaid subscribers in Saudi Arabia, United Kingdom, United Arab Emirates, Singapore,
Portugal, Thailand, Cyprus, Bangladesh, Uzbekistan, Tunisia, Sri Lanka, Belgium and Kuwait
with lowest rates, featuring no security deposit and activation charges. GPRS Roaming facility is
available with more than 115 Live Operators across 85 countries. The company has also been
awarded a new License for providing cellular services in Azad Jammu & Kashmir and Northern
Areas.
BRIEF HISTORY
3
Impact of Competitor on Brand Equity in Telecommunication
In 1990, Pakistan introduced its first mobile phone service called “Paktel”. After eleven years
in January 2001, a new cellular company with GSM technology came into the market and they
named it Ufone. The government of Pakistan granted them the license of Pak Telecom mobile
limited to operate GSM 9000 all Around Pakistan. Ufone succeeded to establish itself in the
market by providing quality service at low rates. After it’s opening, initially they started their
service in major cities like Rawalpindi, Islamabad, Karachi and Lahore and on major highways.
Later the service expanded to other major cities like Peshawar, Quetta and different towns.
Ufone invested around $ 65 million to setup its modern technical infrastructure to provide high
quality crystal clear voice and fast data transmission. Ufone targeted the middle class, by
introducing low rates and different packages with Urdu names like Jazba etc to attracted lower
and middle class people. Ufone has expanded its customer support in a very organized manner
with a planned network of dealers, outlets for people convenient. Ufone not only focused on the
technical capabilities, but to provide subscribers a convenient to get connections and services.
Ufone recently started GPRS through which users can connect themselves to the global village
via Internet, also introduced multimedia messaging services and worldwide SMS at flat rates.
Not only SMS but also provides Ufone Info service through which user can get latest
information about news, sports, religion, horoscope, stock exchange etc even live sports updates.
The tariff packages have been designed keeping in mind the requirements of every segment of
the society may that be a housewife, a taxi driver, a trader or a student. Ufone started its
operation from Islamabad on 29th January 2001. Cellular industry performance in Pakistan
before the launch of Ufone was quite dismal, with one of the lowest population penetration rates
in the Whole region. Ufone’s strategy from the day one was to change this scenario and ensure
that mobile phones are turned into an everyday business and personal communication tools for
all. This approach brought about a revolution in the market; increasing its size five fold in a mere
two years.Ufone’s own performance in these two years has been exemplary, as it surpassed all
financial and marketing goals. Despite Ufone’s strategy to provide a high standard of service
rather than increasing subscriber base without capacity, it has achieved a substantial market share
in a market ten years older than itself.
MISSION
4
Impact of Competitor on Brand Equity in Telecommunication
"Ufone, it's all about U! We are where you want to be… …At Ufone we aim to provide you
with wider coverage, superior connectivity, clear signals & voice quality. Wherever you are,
Ufone keeps you connected.
VISION
“To be the leading telecommunication service provider in Pakistan by offering innovate
communication solutions for our customers while exceeding shareholder value & employee
expectation.”
Brands:
While keeping its tradition of being the trend setter in the industry, Ufone changed the image of
mobile phones from a luxury only affordable by the elite, to a necessity affordable by the
common man. Since its inception, Ufone has positioned its brand for masses. In keeping with the
5
Impact of Competitor on Brand Equity in Telecommunication
upcoming competition and market dynamics, Ufone increased its focus on the youth segment
(which comprises 50% of the population), with the Prepay brand. By designing market focused
products, Ufone’s brand team launched aggressive campaigns, which further increased the brand
equity. The new brand image gained huge popularity amongst the targeted market. A recent
marketing survey conducted by a prominent marketing research company showed that Ufone has
considerably increased its brand visibility and image. Ufone’s Prepay brand is now considered to
be one of the most favored brands by the youth market and is followed by other mobile operators
launching their respective brands for the youth market.
UFONE’s ACHIEVEMENTS
►During 2006 Ufone successfully completed the network expansion of Phase 4 in existing as
well as in new cities and towns which amounted to more than US Dollar 170 million. As a result
the asset base of the Company has increased from Rs. 20 billion to Rs. 27 billion.
►Ufone adopted the policy of simplified tariffs with no hidden charges, which resulted in
positive impacts on total subscriber base, which has increased from 2,579k in June 2005 to
7,487k in June 2006.
►Ufone currently caters for international roaming to more than 195 live operators across 119
countries and introduced International roaming facility for Prepaid subscribers in Saudi Arabia,
United Kingdom, United Arab Emirates, Singapore, Portugal and Kuwait with lowest rates,
featuring no security deposit and activation charges. GPRS roaming facility is available with
more than 75 Live Operators across 59 countries.
►The Company has also been awarded a new License for providing cellular services in Azad
Jammu & Kashmir and the Northern Areas.
OPERATING PERFORMANCE
Ufone’s operational performance has been very encouraging. Despite the stiff competition in
Pakistan telecom market which has led to reduction of prices to bare minimum level, due to its
6
Impact of Competitor on Brand Equity in Telecommunication
aggressive policies and exercising strict control over expenses the Company managed to improve
its revenue and after-tax profit by 87% and 54% respectively, as compared to last year.
GROWTH RATE
As mobile users in the country have reached over 28 million at a very rapid pace, Ufone has
maintained itself as the 2nd largest cellular operator in Pakistan with a subscriber base of around
6.5 million and a market share of nearly 25%. Ufone has seen a subscriber growth rate of over
200% in the last year, and since the start of 2005 Ufone added nearly 5 million subscribers onto
its network. A remarkable achievement indeed, especially considering the fact that two new
international players also entered into the market in 2005. Subsequently the growth in subscriber
base caused a healthy trend in revenues which have doubled.
TECHNOLOGY
After Mobilink, Ufone is the second cellular service provider company that is based on GSM
technology. Basically they are using GSM 900 technology with version 2001. Apart from this
they are very strong in technological developments especially they have a well-established
research and development department that is working on new technological developments in
their products. Like they are the first company in Pakistan that is offering GPRS facility to their
subscribers
STRUCTURE OF THE ORGANIZATION
In Ufone the hierarchy is very lean, in general the whole setup is centralized, all the matters are to be reported to the main company and all the policies and targets are approved at the higher level. But at the department level the structure is decentralized.
7
Impact of Competitor on Brand Equity in Telecommunication
► UFONE has following functional departments:-
§ Technical
§ Customer operations
§ Finance
§ Administration & Procurement
§ Human Resource
§ Co-ordination (Govt. relations)
Marketing
Current CEO (Chief Executive Officer) &
President of UFONE is Mr.Mubashir Naqvi
Ufone’s Head Offices is in Islamabad
SERVICES
Both Post-Paid and Pre-Paid Ufone subscribers can enjoy any/all Ufone services including GPRS based services (MMS, Ufone Internet, Pocket Stocks), Global SMS, etc
Ufone is proving these all services to its consumers:-
• Internal Excess,
Online Billing Payment
• Power SIM
• WAP
• International Roaming
• Voice Mail
8
Impact of Competitor on Brand Equity in Telecommunication
• Call Management
• Messaging
MOBILE PRODUCTS
Ufone is offering the following Mobile Products:-
Utalk
Missed Call Notification
Phonebook Saver
Trivia Quiz
Ushare
Uloan
Voice Bucket
Utunes
Awaz SMS
Uchat
Ugames
Call Block
Self Service Kiosk
U kisaan
U health
Ufone prize bond
Ubazar
9
Impact of Competitor on Brand Equity in Telecommunication
Hajj Guide
BRAND EQUITY
“Brand equity is the unique set of real and/or perceived distinctions attached to a brand by
customers…. Brand equity lives only in the hearts and minds of customers.”
10
Impact of Competitor on Brand Equity in Telecommunication
REVIEW OF LITERATURE
Brand equity, a measure of the overall value of a brand (Keller, 1998), is a key concept in brand
management. Brand equity has been identified as a valuable source of competitive advantage for
many organizations (Aaker, 1991; Bharadwaj, Varadarajan and Fahy, 1993; Keller ,1998). Keller
11
Impact of Competitor on Brand Equity in Telecommunication
(1993) conceptualizes brand equity as “the differential effect of brand knowledge on consumer
response to the marketing of the brand”. Furthermore, Keller proposes brand knowledge as
central to the definition of brand equity and contends that high levels of brand knowledge
increase the probability of brand choice, and defines brand knowledge in terms of brand
awareness and image. Keller conceptualizes brand awareness as “the strength of the brand trace
in memory that is reflected by the consumer’s ability to identify the brand under different
conditions” and defines brand image as “perceptions about a brand as reflected by the brand
associations held in consumer memory”. The customer-based brand equity is a set of brand-
related associations held by the consumer in memory (e.g., Keller, 1993). Under this perspective,
brand equity is regarded as being largely attitudinal in nature, composed of beliefs, affect, and
other subjective experiences related to the brand (i.e., brand attitude, brand image, etc.) In
addition, existing research on brand equity is used to identify four cognitive “components” of
customer-based brand equity. These are labeled as global brand attitude, strength of preference,
brand knowledge, and brand heuristic (Girish and Clayton, 2004). Others have tried to further
extend brand equity by including constructs, such as brand loyalty, brand awareness, perceived
quality, in addition to brand associations (e.g., Aaker, 1991; Keller, 1993)
Brand equity is defined as a set of assets and liabilities linked to the brand, which add value to or
subtract value from a product in its relationship with customers (Aaker, 1991). Aaker believed
that the value of brand equity came from five brand equity assets(brand loyalty, brand awareness,
perceived quality, brand associations and other proprietary brand assets), in which perceived
quality and brand associations were two most important assets. All these brand equity assets
could bring value for the enterprise and customer. The brand loyalty based on client can defend
the attack of competitor’s marketing, and the effect of competitive manufacturer’s marketing
efforts to attract the loyal customer of other brand is always unsatisfactory. Brand awareness can
provide the familiarity to a brand and the signal of substantiality and promise if the customer
knows the brand; while it will influence the consideration of customer to brand and further
influence the selection of customer on brand when the brand is memorized. The perceived
quality can influence the purchase decision and brand loyalty directly, especially when the
customer has not been stimulated by inducement or can’t make detailed analysis. Brand
association can assist customer to deal with or memorize information and become the base of
12
Impact of Competitor on Brand Equity in Telecommunication
product difference and product extension, which will provide a purchase reason for customer and
arise positive feeling.
From the viewpoint of Aaker, the study can find that brand equity can bring value for both client
and manufacturer, and the client value from brand equity is the base to create manufacturer
value. In five assets of brand equity, brand loyalty may be influenced by other key dimensions
(brand awareness, perceived quality and brand associations) of brand equity; therefore brand
loyalty can be regarded as the primary base of brand equity and independent from other
dimensions.
In five assets, other proprietary brand assets (patent, trademark and distributors etc.) are harder to
measure the perspective of customer. In this case, this make perceived quality, brand loyalty,
brand awareness and brand associations as the measure variables of brand equity based on the
achievements of above scholars (e.g., Aaker, 1991; Keller, 1993).
Relationship between Advertising and Brand Equity
Advertising expenditure, as the main marketing communications tool in the consumer market,
should be considered when determining the effects of marketing communications on consumers,
and the perceptions that the messages are provoking among different target individuals (Angel
and Manuel, 2005). Keller (2003) notes that the firm’s marketing communications contribute to
brand equity. That is, effective communication enables the formations of brand awareness and a
positive brand image. When consumers perceive high spending on advertising, this contributes to
their perception of the level of confidence that marketing managers have in the product (Kirmani
and Wright, 1989). Perceived advertising spending has positive effects, not only on brand equity
as a whole, but also on each of the elements it is made up of: loyalty, awareness, perceived
quality and brand associations (Cobb-Walgren, Ruble and Donthu, 1995).
The relationship between perceived quality and spending on marketing communications was
justified by different studies (Milgrom and Roberts, 1986; Kirmani and Wright, 1989; Aaker and
Jacobson, 1994; Archibald, Haulman and Moody, 1983). The work shows the favorable
relationship between marketing communications spending and the firm’s investment in the
13
Impact of Competitor on Brand Equity in Telecommunication
brand, which involves a higher perception of quality. The relationship between the investment in
marketing communications and quality affects not only the perceived brand quality, but also
supports the purchase decision by increasing the product value, as shown by Archibald et al.
(1983) — i.e. the recipient of the advertising considers the perceived advertising spending on the
brand as reaffirming the purchase decision.
From the study of former scholars, we can find that scale variables of brand equity such as
“brand awareness” and “brand attitude” can use “exposure effect” to increase the evaluation of
customer to the brand. Zajonc and Markus (1982) pointed out that “exposure effect” mean the
effect when some marketing objective was exposed repeatedly. The masses will have more
positive attitude to the marketing objective if it is exposed regularly. Anand, Holbrook and
Stephens (1988) also proved that “exposure effect” was a key factor to alter the preference and
attitude in the later study. Laroche, Kim and Zhou (1996) also validated the influence of
“exposure effect” on “brand knowledge”, “brand attitude”, “brand familiarity” and purchase
willing and confidence. Archibald et al. (1983) pointed out the relationship between the
investment in marketing communications and quality affects not only the perceived brand
quality, but also supports the purchase decision by increasing the product value. Hence
advertising expenditures are likely to be positively related to brand equity. This research
proposes the
H1 hypothesis about advertising expenditures and brand equity as below.
H1: Advertising expenditures affects brand equity
H1a: Advertising expenditures is positively related to perceived quality.
H1b: Advertising expenditures is positively related to brand loyalty.
H1c: Advertising expenditures is positively related to brand awareness.
H1d: Advertising expenditures is positively related to brand associations.
Relationship between Price Promotion and Brand Equity
Research has traditionally posited that sales promotions erode brand equity. Usually, price
adapted by the manufacturer as a direct promotion method will increase the purchase willing of
14
Impact of Competitor on Brand Equity in Telecommunication
customer. Most of the effect of a price cut is seen in consumers' short-term brand choices.
Promotions increase the price sensitivity of non-loyal customers (Mela, Gupta and Lehman,
1997). But it does not hold when long-term effects are considered. In this regard, using price
promotions means deterioration in brand equity.
The use of price promotions has a negative effect on brand equity, since it is considered that the
consumer perceives a negative relationship between brand equity and the need to use incentives
for sales that affects the established level of prices(Aaker, 1991; Yoo, Donthu and Lee, 2000).
Sales promotions in general, and especially price promotions, have been considered to weaken
brand equity in spite of the short-term benefit that they provide to the consumer (Yoo, Donthu
and Lee, 2000). Overall, the long-term effects of price promotions on sales are negative.
Therefore, price promotion may have negative influence on customer perceptions making
differential consciousness of customer on perceived quality, and then influences the brand equity
of product and purchase willing of customer. Activities based on lowering prices can place
brands in danger by provoking consumer confusion, instability and variability leads to an image
of unstable quality (Winer, 1986). Hence, this research proposes the research hypothesis.
H2: Price promotion affects brand equity
H2a: Price promotion is negatively related to perceived quality.
H2b: Price promotion is negatively related to brand loyalty.
H2c: Price promotion is negatively related to brand awareness.
H2d: Price promotion is negatively related to brand associations.
POSITIONING
Positioning is basically to implement an image into the consumer’s minds, by using Positive
traits of the product.
15
Impact of Competitor on Brand Equity in Telecommunication
1. Positioning concept of Ufone:
The slogan of Ufone is “Its all about you”. By this slogan, Ufone is positioning itself as a
Company, which moulds itself according to their customers. Ufone is also implying that, it is a
very flexible, adaptable and user friendly. So the image of Ufone in the minds of people is that, it
is inexpensive, well performing & customer oriented.
2. Characteristics of present Positioning:
How can we conclude the positioning status mentioned above? We can do it, by looking at the
following facts:
• International roaming across 125 countries.
• Provides wide coverage, with clear signals & voice quality.
• User friendly Customer services & Sales
• Accurate Billing
• It is using latest technological facilities (e-g online phone-book,
Transferring balance, WAP etc)
By taking a look at these features of Ufone, we can state that Ufone’s positioning is Mainly, “It
has made packages and Services, according to target market’s needs.”
3. Positioning strategy:
The primary positioning strategy of Ufone is “Positioning by Price, Quality &
Competitors”.
The secondary positioning strategy is an extension of the primary strategy. And that is to
Position according to Product’s class & attributes. (In this case, attributes mean Services).
PROMOTION
Ufone believes in Integrated Marketing Communication which is a carefully blended mix of
promotion tools. Ufone employ different marketing activities and channels to communicate and
16
Impact of Competitor on Brand Equity in Telecommunication
deliver value to customer. These activities are coordinated to provide maximum communication
output. These communication channels includes:-
Advertising, Sales promotion, Public relations, Direct marketing, Personal selling.
Ufone strategize to carry out promotion in order to increase its market share.
Promotion Strategy:
v Advertising (discussed later)
v Sales Promotion (discussed later)
v Public Relations : Ufone is less conscious of developing its general public relations. But
recently it has launched its “Hajj Guide” service on Ufone. It avoids getting in news stories and
controversies but sometimes it proves inevitable.
v Direct Marketing : Ufone employ on-road umbrella franchises where the directly market and
sell their connections and Sims.
v Personal Selling : Ufone administer personal selling facility to sell their PostPay connections
targeting well to do people and businessmen
› It won’t be an exaggeration to say that Ufone has placed itself where it is now through brilliant
promotions.
SALES PROMOTION
“Sales promotions are short term incentives to encourage the purchase or sale of a product or
service”
Ufone uses following sales promotion tools
17
Impact of Competitor on Brand Equity in Telecommunication
Contests:
Ufone carried out contest for cricket talent hunt in the year 200_______. Our renowned Pakistani
cricketer Shoaib Akhtar was used as patron for this contest. However this contest didn’t do much
good to Ufone’s image or sales. But Ufone holds future plans to carry out such activities in more
effective and profitable ways.
Games:
Ufone is currently running its game show on ATV prime time. This game show rewards the
winning participants. Ufone updates its customers every now and then to participate in this game
show. The problem we see in this activity is that Ufone is not properly advertising it.
Premiums:
All the cellular services are now offering premiums for their customers. This premium is offered,
when a customer don’t use his/her sim for more than 3-6 months, in the form of extra credit
balance delivered to their numbers for free
Free tickets:
Ufone recently offered free trip to Dubai. It was Ufone’s first Eid offer. Every time you make
any international call of 5 minutes or longer than 5 minutes, you enter the lucky draw to win a
return ticket to Dubai. The more calls you make, more is your chance to win.
COMPETITORS
There is a hard core competition among the cellular service providers in Pakistan. Ufone is a
market challenger in its competitive position, where MOBILINK is the market leader. Warid,
Telenor and newly introduced ZONG are also strong contenders in market challenger category.
Ufone has the following four direct competitors:-
18
Impact of Competitor on Brand Equity in Telecommunication
Mobilink, Telenor, Warid.
Ufone also considers the following as its competitors:-
ZONG (former PAKTEL), PTCL WIRELESS, Wateen, WorldCall
Competitive strategy:
Ufone’s competitive strategies are Customer intimacy and Differentiation. Ufone aims at fore
passing Mobilink in its competitive race.
19
Impact of Competitor on Brand Equity in Telecommunication
Competitors’ Analysis:
1. Mobilink
• Pioneer cellular 100% GSM company in Pakistan
• It is the first one to introduce the concept of FRANCHISE in cellular industry
• ISO 9002 quality management system certification for the billing, engineering department
and customer service contact center
• Big market share
• Loyal customer base
• Branded product
• Broad coverage area
• Mobilink benefits from broad coverage, with the widest network of easily accessible GSM
centers, and Connect Point of Sales Express Shops. Customer service too is friendly, with an
automated phone mechanism that directs
• Customers to particular departments, providing a choice of Urdu- or English-speaking
operators.
• Easy load facility is another advantage.
• Greater number of postpaid corporate customers.
Following are problems with Mobilink
• Lack of quality service.
• Connectivity problems.
• High call charges to other networks and high SMS charges.
2. Warid
• New and innovative post paid packages.
• Friends and family packages.
• Free minutes are given for post paid users depending upon connection.
• 30 seconds billing and 1 second billing in Zahi postpaid connection.
• Huge investment.
20
Impact of Competitor on Brand Equity in Telecommunication
• Heavy advertisement.
• 4 million users in just one year after introduction.
• Coverage area is less and network is expanding slowly.
3. Telenor
• Friends and Family packages e.g. (PERSONA). Call charges are different for first minute and
following minutes.
• Heavy advertisement.
• Huge investment.
• Easy Load facility.
• Voice quality is very good.
• No connectivity problems.
• Coverage area is increasing rapidly.
4. Zong
• Huge investment
• Rapid growth of market share
• Simple and clear marketing strategy
• Controlled by the worlds largest telecommunication company (subscriptions vise)
• Claiming to have the lowest call rates
COMPETITIVE ADVANTAGES
It’s an advantage over competitors gained by offering consumers greater value than competitor’s
offer. Ufone strategizes to gain more and more competitive advantages. It also uses these
competitive advantages well enough for its promotion. Currently Ufone is enjoying the following
competitive advantages:-
21
Impact of Competitor on Brand Equity in Telecommunication
v Lowest overall call rates
v Value added Services (VAS)
v Call block service
v Corporate color
CHALLENGES
Ufone face many challenges with the ever growing needs of telecommunication. It must remain
profitable with the decreasing economical situation of Pakistan. It must grow as well in these
dark times if it has to remain IN the market. Ufone face very strong competition from its
competitors. It must offer lowest rates with better quality service. New features and services
should be introduced to make its customers loyal, happy and satisfied.
FUTURE PLANS
►Keeping in view the growth potential of the cellular industry there is no option but to be
aggressive in order to remain a potent force in the cellular industry.
►A strong focus will be on maintaining high quality of service, which is always a benchmark of
Ufone, increasing usage and exploring new revenue streams on value added services, market
visibility through various market initiatives to fulfill subscribers’ satisfaction and demand and
above all to increase the value of investment for the shareholders.
MATERIALS AND METHODS
RESEARCH METHOD
Figure 1 exhibits the research framework of this study. It demonstrates the effects of advertising expenditure and price promotion on brand equity and shift the spot light on the moderating role of product category.
22
Brand equity
Perceived qualityBrand loyaltyBrand awarenessBrand associations
Search productExperience product
Price promotion
Advertising
Product category
Impact of Competitor on Brand Equity in Telecommunication
Figure 1: Conceptual Framework
Definition and Measurement
This research contains three constructs including advertising, price promotion and brand equity.
Advertising expenditure, as the main marketing communications tool in the consumer market,
should be considered when determining the effects of marketing communications on consumers,
and the perceptions that the messages are provoking among different target individuals.
Therefore, advertising in this study is defined as the consumer’s subjective perception of
advertising expenditures for the brand.
The measurement scale is developed with reference to Yoo et al.(2000) and Martin (2000). Price
promotions mean short-term price reduction such as special sales. It is measured as consumer’s
subjective perception of frequency of the price promotions used for the brand. The measurement
scale is developed with reference to Yoo et al.(2000) and Martin (2000). The scale of brand
equity measures four core dimensions: perceived quality, brand loyalty, brand awareness and
brand associations. Perceived quality is defined as a subjective judgment made by the consumer
regarding the excellence or superiority of a product (Zeithaml, 1988). The measurement scale is
developed with reference to Aaker and A´ lvarez del Blanco(1995), Lassar et al.(1995) and Yoo
et al.(2000). Brand loyalty plays an outstanding role in generating brand equity, not only because
of its capacity to keep customers loyal (Aaker, 1991; Grover and Srinivasan, 1992), but also
because that customer loyalty extends to other brands in the company’s portfolio (Cebollada,
23
Impact of Competitor on Brand Equity in Telecommunication
1995). In this study, brand loyalty refers to the overall commitment of being loyal to a specific
brand. The measurement scale is developed with reference to Aaker and A´ lvarez del
Blanco(1995) and Yoo et al.(2000). Brand awareness measured as the consumer’s subjective
perception-level of the brand. High levels of brand-name recognition are those that present the
brand with a high degree of brand awareness. The measurement scale is developed with
reference to Yoo et al.(2000). Brand associations are related to a series of tangible and intangible
attributes associated with the brand, which conditions a favorable attitude to choosing the brand.
The measurement scale is developed with reference to Aaker and A´ lvarez del Blanco (1995),
Lassar et al.(1995) and Yoo et al.(2000). All the items of construct are measured with the Likert
5-point scale.
Research Methodology:
We adopt the following method to collect the data
o Primary Data
o Secondary Data
o Internet
o Broachers
o Questionnaire
o Interview
Research Design
I selected a topic for conducting the research on Impact of Competitor on Brand Equity in
telecommunication industry. I used the methodological approach of interviews from different
Businessmen, Students and teachers, for it first I develop a questionnaire and I will try to find out
the accurate results.
Accumulations and Sample
24
Impact of Competitor on Brand Equity in Telecommunication
I took sample size of 25 people for this research about Impact of Competitor on Brand Equity in
telecommunication industry which includes businessman, students, bankers and I conduct
research in Faisalabad.
Assumptions
We are taking sample size of 25 people for this research which includes businessman, students,
bankers and govt. officials and I conduct research in Faisalabad.
Delimitation of the Study
While making this project I faced numerous of problems are load shedding which always break
the continuity and concentration while making project. Secondly this research related to my topic
were not easily available on internet.
Population sample
Population Sample size
1- Students 11
2- Job person 4
3- Businessman 10
Samples and Sample Method
In this research, I took the sample size of 25 people and I have chosen almost all categories’
people which are related to telecommunication industry directly or indirectly.
Research Instruments
I prepared 3 close ended questions and 9 questions are four intervals and there are few three
intervals questions in this research’s questionnaire.
25
Impact of Competitor on Brand Equity in Telecommunication
Procedures and Data Collection
In this research project mostly all the data is primary data which I will conduct research myself
like I will personally go to the students, job person, businessman and I gathered the information
through questionnaire and secondary data is also used in literature review.
RESULTS AND DISCUSSION
CONCLUSION
Telecom industry is most growing industry of Pakistan still huge investment required for
coverage. The market also has strong competition after the entrance of China Mobile Company
as player. Competitors are hiring professionals to entertain the consumer which is resulting
technological implementation and value added services. People are worried about call rates they
don’t prefer any particular company. Consumer searches good service with lowest call rates,
although companies are minimizing call rates this will result more growth in the market. Ufone
bring amazing packages to attract the customers. Ufone promote their product through TV
26
Impact of Competitor on Brand Equity in Telecommunication
commercial, Newspaper, Radio, Internet etc. The choice of people is Ufone because Ufone price
level is low and affordable that every one can say “it’s all about U”
This research investigates advertising across search and experience product categories. Across
both categories, the brand with the higher advertising budget yielded substantially higher levels
of brand equity. This study notes that the firm’s advertising contributes to brand equity and
increases loyalty. Perceived advertising spending showed a favorable causal relationship for
three of the four dimensions of brand equity. The higher the spending on advertising for the
brand, the better the quality of the product as perceived by the consumer, the higher the level of
brand awareness and the more associations linked to the product, forming its brand loyalty. That
is, effective advertising activities enable the formations of brand awareness and a positive
perceived quality, brand loyalty and brand associations. To summarize, advertising has a positive
effect on brand equity. Hence, hypothesis H1a, H1b, H1c and H1d are supported. The research
question that concerns this study is whether price promotions can contribute to building brand
equity. Price promotions have a negative effect on brand equity in the long term. Price
promotions as incentives to increase sales have been shown to have a negative effect on brand
equity. Although they can cause a short-term benefit to the consumer, from a strategic
perspective they showed negative effects. These effects can affect the perceived quality of the
product adversely, since benefits gained through price promotion are not enduring, and do not
transmit the security or the confidence that a brand should inspire with regard to its expected
utility. However, adopting a consumer-based brand knowledge perspective of brand equity, this
study shows that price promotions of bank are useful to create brand equity because of their
positive effect on perceived quality, brand loyalty and brand associations. Nevertheless, the
statistics of the search product proves that price promotion has significant negative impact on
brand awareness and brand association. Hence, H2 is partially supported.
This paper seeks to systematically examine the possible drivers of differences across product
categories and the implications of our preliminary findings. The result proves that the product
category does have moderate effect in between price promotion and brand equity. The result
shows that product categories moderated the relationship between advertising, price promotion
and brand equity. The influence of advertising and price promotion on brand equity is different
from search goods/services and non-search (experience and credence) goods/services. Compare
27
Impact of Competitor on Brand Equity in Telecommunication
to non-search goods/services, search goods/services is positively more effective in advertising on
brand equity. The impact direction and dimension of price promotion on brand equity in various
product categories are different. In search products (UFONE), it has significant negative impact
on brand awareness and brand association. In non-search products (bank), it has significant
positive impact on perceived quality and brand loyalty. The product category exerts a moderator
effect on the relationship between brand equity and advertising or price promotion. Hypotheses
H3 and H4 are supported.
APPENDIX
Research Questionnaires
Dear Sir/Madam,
I am the student of MBA at University of Agriculture Faisalabad
The following questionnaires are about my research project “Impact of Competitor on Brand
Equity in telecommunication industry” Kindly provide impartial opinion about each
statement. I request you please provide me information to complete my research. I also undertake
28
Impact of Competitor on Brand Equity in Telecommunication
that all the information provided by you is solely for academic purpose only. The information
obtained from you will be kept confidential I shall be very oblige to you.
Yours truly,
Raees Ahmad Zafar.
Questionnaire:
Name: _____________________ Mob: ________________
Gender:
(i) Male (ii) Female
Age Group (please tick the appropriate one):
(i) 0-18 (ii) 19-24 (iii) 25-35 (iv) 36-50 (v) 50+
Which area do you belong to?
(i) Urban (ii) Rural
As there are many Cellular Companies in the Telecom Industry, do you think because of
the competition, the services are being improved? (Please tick appropriate one.)
(i) Yes (ii) No
Are you currently using any of the following service connections?
a) Mobilink b) Telenor c) Ufone d) Zong e) Warid
Which one of the following service connections has the best voice clarity?
a) Mobilink b) Telenor c) Ufone d) Zong e) Warid
Which one of the following service connections has the best coverage?
a) Mobilink b) Telenor c) Ufone d) Zong e) Warid
Which one of the following service connections gives you more better service?
a) Mobilink b) Telenor c) Ufone d) Zong e) Warid
29
Impact of Competitor on Brand Equity in Telecommunication
Which one of the following service connections has the best promotional strategies?
a) Mobilink b) Telenor c) Ufone d) Zong e) Warid
Which one of the following is the main competitor of UFONE?
a) Mobilink b) Telenor c) Ufone d) Zong e) Warid
Would you recommend Ufone to a friend?
• Yes • No
What recommendations you offer for improving Ufone service?
• Better sales promotions
• Improved network coverage
• Include more features in SIM services (Power tools)
• Better Call Rates
Contact list
Names Occupation Contact numbersAhmad Ali Businessman 03467747467Ahsan Awan Job person 03219666649 Ali Raza Job person 03006627927Aslam Student 03218665737 Athar Businessman 03457730072 Awais Businessman 03237693163 Ayesha Malik Student 03217820507Azam butt Student 03457939493
30
Impact of Competitor on Brand Equity in Telecommunication
Danish Awan Businessman 03008664682 Faisal Ikram Businessman 03218598888Fareed Attah Job person 03006601926Hamid Mehmood Businessman 03006519500 Hamza Aataf Student 03226224524 Hina Arshad Job person 03426939277M. Bilal Student ------ M.Rehman Student ------Rameez Ahmad Student 03216660306Umer Raiz Student 03216660092Usman Iqbal Businessman 03338393537
Waqas Javaid Student 03007651768Wasim Job person 03437433388Yasir Latif Businessman 03018210239Yousaf Student 03009656716Zaib Businessman 03216687904Zubair Sathie Job person 03236654255
REFERENCE
www.google.com
www.ufone.com
www.nation.com
www.telecompk.net
www.pta.geo.com
Aaker, D. A. (1991) ‘Managing Brand Equity. Capitalizing on the Value of Brand Name’, The Free Press, New York, NY.
31
Impact of Competitor on Brand Equity in Telecommunication
Angel F. Villarejo-Ramos, Manuel J. Sa´nchez-Franco (2005, 8), ‘The impact of marketing communication and price promotion on brand equity’, Brand Management, vol.12, No.6, 431-444
32