UCSU Malpractice
-
Upload
harriet-airey -
Category
Documents
-
view
225 -
download
1
description
Transcript of UCSU Malpractice
Information about
The University
Malpractice Procedure
Independent Advice, Support and Representation
What is the Malpractice Procedure? The University of Cumbria has a formal procedure to deal with any allegations of academic malpractice. It is one of the most formal and potentially serious procedures the University has and in cases of extreme cheating it can lead to a student being deregistered. Students are usually asked to attend malpractice hearings when the University suspects that some form or academic malpractice has occurred. The usual process for getting to this stage involves some suspicion of malpractice when a Tutor is marking an assessment or if it is an assignment then possible malpractice may have been suspected as a result of scanning it through ‘Turnitin’* *Turnitin is an electronic programme that scans in assignments and then searches a huge variety of sources to detect plagiarism. What is malpractice? In brief, malpractice can involve the following categories:
• Cheating in exams
• Plagiarism
• Collusion in coursework (working with someone else)
• Fabrication and falsification
• Impersonation
• Breaching anonymity requirements as prescribed by your course.
Most malpractice cases involve plagiarism and in most cases malpractice has occurred
but is not always intentional.
What happens if you are suspected of Malpractice?
The Students’ Union strongly recommends that students look at the Student
Regulations as the policy is clearly set out in terms of process and sanctions. In
addition to this, contact the Student’s Union Student Advisor (see details on the back
cover) and they will be able to talk you through the process, and can also attend the
meeting with you if you would like.
What happens at the hearing?
At the hearing there will be a panel made up of 3 academic University staff members,
normally a Head of School or Programme Leader will be the Chair. These panel
members will usually be listed in the letter that the student receives about their
hearing. The hearing usually starts with the Chair introducing the Panel and
explaining the purpose of the meeting. If the student hasn’t posted in the form
mentioned in point 2 above then they’ll be asked to hand the form to the Chair or
Secretary at the Hearing. The Chair will note their response and ask if the student
would like to make a statement about how they feel malpractice has occurred. Then
the panel will ask any relevant questions that they may have about the work in
question. Then the student is usually asked to leave and wait outside the hearing
while the panel discusses whether malpractice has occurred and which
outcomes/sanctions might be appropriate. The student is then normally asked to
return and is informed of the recommended outcome.
Writing a statement
We recommend that students write down what they are wanting to say at the
hearing in a statement beforehand so that the student is clear about what they want
to say, and don’t forget to mention any key points. Your statement should aim to:
• Explain how you believe the malpractice has or has not occurred. If you have
intentionally cheated or plagiarised then we fully support that honesty is the
best policy.
• Cover and explain any extenuating or mitigating circumstances that may have
led to you making genuine mistakes or intentionally cheating.
You should aim to answer as many of the relevant questions from the list below as
possible as this will help to make your position as clear as possible.
Type of questions a student may be asked at a malpractice hearing:
• What do you understand plagiarism to be?
• What does your Course Handbook / Student Handbook say about plagiarism –
have you read it, if not why not?
• If you are expected to ensure confidentiality by making certain data and
information anonymous, then what guidance are you given about how to do
this?
• Is any information provided in lectures/seminars about avoiding plagiarism?
• What have you done since finding out about this Hearing – who have you
talked to / asked for help/explanations?
• How did you put the piece of work together?
• Did you get any written/oral guidelines in putting it together?
• What source material did you use – where did you get it from?
• How did you use the source material?
• Did you photocopy from books – did you highlight text?
• How did you transfer these ‘notes’ to your actual assignment?
• Did you paraphrase the source material?
• Did you re-write it in your own words?
• Did you get information from the Internet?
• Did you copy and paste text from the internet to a word document, did you
print the page?
• Then what did you do with the text – was it inserted into the assignment, did
you treat it as notes?
• What do you understand about referencing / bibliographies?
• What referencing system are you required to use in your department? (E.g.
Harvard referencing – would be the normal unless told otherwise by
department). This is normally stated in the Course/Student Handbook.
The student should provide as much information as is pertinent to the case at the
Hearing. After the hearing a student can also write a letter of mitigation to the Chair
of the Exam /Assessment Board stating their case.
Potential Outcomes:
The Panel makes a recommendation to the Exam or Assessment Board about which
penalty might be appropriate. Then the Assessment Board makes a final decision
based on the panel’s recommendation which can be exactly the same as the penalty
recommended or can be more lenient..
All potential outcomes are listed in the regulations, but potential outcomes may
include:
• The particular piece of assessment in question being awarded a fail mark with
only one opportunity of reassessment.
• The panel may decide that malpractice has not occurred
In very serious cases the following may occur:
• be awarded a classification lower than the one derived from the marks profile
• be awarded no more than a pass degree
• be permanently excluded from the University
There is no automatic right of reassessment if a student is failed on the basis of
malpractice.
If you are a student on a professional course such as nursing, then there
may be an impact on your perceived fitness to practice if you are found to
have intentionally tried to pass off other source material as your own
work.
This information leaflet only gives a very general overview of a process that can seem
very daunting one, especially for a student called to a hearing. If you are called to a
Malpractice Hearing then the Students’ Union the we would recommend that you
get in touch with our Student Advisor asap as will talk to you about any concerns
you have beforehand, help you write your statement and give you an idea of the type
of questions that the panel may ask and which of the potential outcomes you could
be faced with.
Contacting the Advice Service
If you would like any further information, would like to arrange an appointment or want to speak to a Students’ Union
Advice Service staff member then contact:
Students’ Union Student Advisors Telephone: 01524 590810
email: [email protected]
You can also drop in to your local Students’ Union Office on each main Campus to speak to the Student Advisor in person,
on the telephone or to arrange a suitable appointment.
If you’d prefer it you can arrange an online chat with the Student Advisor on MSN Messenger (Mon-Fri 10am- 4pm)
email: [email protected] to arrange an appointment.
Why not visit the Advice Service section of the Students’ Union website to see what other information and advice we can offer?
www.thestudentsunion.org.uk/advice
If you would like this document in an alternative format please contact Mike Taylor
On Tel:01524 590810 or e-mail:[email protected]