Design ~ Typography Typography 101 Using Typography to Enhance Content.
Typography and You
-
Upload
ali-fisher -
Category
Documents
-
view
217 -
download
1
description
Transcript of Typography and You
TYPOGRAPHYAND YOU
a guide to learning to love the serifs, kearning, and more of typography
typographyand you
typographyand you
220283850647478848894108118124
rules
hyphenation
alignments
justification
combining typefaces
quotes, dashes, apostrophes
special characters
bullets
numerals & figures
small caps
paragraph breaks
headers, subheads, crossheads
captions and notes
font specs
rules
04+
The following is a
compendium of the rules
established in this book.
You might want to check
through them each time you
complete a publication.
RULES
real apostrophes, real quotation marks, en or em dashes consistently, only one space between sentences, a one-em first-line in-dent on all indented paragraphs, a decimal or right-aligned tab for the numbers in numbered paragraphs, the special charac-ters whenever necessary, including super- and subscript, an accent mark if a correctly spelled word needs it.
justify the text on a short line, have one line in a paragraph in the column or following, use the spacebar to align text, always set tabs and use the tab key, hyphenate a words in a headline and avoid hyphenation in a callout, combine two serif fonts on one page.
more than three hyphenations in a row, too many hyphenations in any paragraph, ending lines with the words: the, of, at, a, by., ending consecutive lines with the same word, beginning consecutive lines with the same word, hyphenating or line brakes of names and proper nouns.
no widows or orphans, a least two charac-ters on the line and three following.
rules
make sure the apostrophes are where they belong, hang the punctuation off the aligned edge, keep the word spacing consistent, tighten up the leading in lines with all caps or with few ascenders and descender, adjust the spacing between paragraphs, either indent the first line of paragraphs or add extra space between them – not both, rarely combine two sans serif fonts on one page, rarely combine more than three typefaces on one page, spend the time to create nice fraction or chose a font that has fractions.
+05
MELIORherman zapf
x-height: large character width: average color: medium
9/12
Xxhg
9/12
DINalbert ian pool
x-height: large character width: narrow color: dark
Futurism was first announced on February 20, 1909, when the Paris newspaper Le Figaro published a manifesto by the Italian poet and editor Filippo Tommaso Marinetti. The name Futurism, coined by Marinetti, reflected his emphasis on discarding what he conceived to be the static and irrelevant art of the past and celebrating change, original-ity, and innovation in culture and society. Futurism rejected traditions and glorified contemporary life, mainly by emphasizing two dominant themes, the machine and motion. The works were characterized by the depiction of several successive actions of a subject at the same time. Marinetti’s manifesto glorified the new technology of the automobile and the beauty of its speed, power, and movement. He exalted violence and conflict and called for the sweep-ing repudiation of traditional cultural, social, and political values and the destruction of such cultural institu-tions as museums and libraries.
Xxhg06+
Futurism was first announced on February 20, 1909, when the Paris newspaper Le Figaro published a manifesto by the Italian poet and editor Filippo Tommaso Marinetti. The name Futurism, coined by Marinetti, reflected his emphasis on discarding what he conceived to be the static and irrelevant art of the past and celebrating change, original-ity, and innovation in culture and society. Futurism rejected traditions and glorified contemporary life, mainly by emphasizing two dominant themes, the machine and motion. The works were characterized by the depiction of several successive actions of a subject at the same time. Marinetti’s manifesto glorified the new technology of the automobile and the beauty of its speed, power, and movement. He exalted violence and conflict and called for the sweep-ing repudiation of traditional cultural, social, and political values and the destruction of such cultural institu-tions as museums and libraries.
Readability and legibility are two key elements of printed text that typographer strive to maximize. Readability extend-ed amount of text – such as an article, book, or annual report – is easy to read. Legibility refers to whether an refers to whether a short burst of text – such as a headline catalog listing, or stop sign – is instantly recognizable.
72 pt
+07
rules
MRS EAVESzuzana licko
x-height: small character width: average color: light
Xxhg
9/12
UNIVERSadrian frutiger
x-height: large character width: narrow color: light
Xxhg
9/12
08+
Futurism was first announced on February 20, 1909, when the Paris newspaper Le Figaro published a manifesto by the Italian poet and editor Filippo Tommaso Marinetti. The name Futurism, coined by Marinetti, reflected his emphasis on discarding what he conceived to be the static and irrelevant art of the past and celebrating change, original-ity, and innovation in culture and society. Futurism rejected traditions and glorified contemporary life, mainly by emphasizing two dominant themes, the machine and motion. The works were characterized by the depiction of several successive actions of a subject at the same time. Marinetti’s manifesto glorified the new technology of the automobile and the beauty of its speed, power, and movement. He exalted violence and conflict and called for the sweep-ing repudiation of traditional cultural, social, and political values and the destruction of such cultural institu-tions as museums and libraries.
Futurism was first announced on February 20, 1909, when the Paris newspaper Le Figaro published a manifesto by the Italian poet and editor Filippo Tommaso Marinetti. The name Futurism, coined by Marinetti, reflected his emphasis on discarding what he conceived to be the static and irrelevant art of the past and celebrating change, original-ity, and innovation in culture and society. Futurism rejected traditions and glorified contemporary life, mainly by emphasizing two dominant themes, the machine and motion. The works were characterized by the depiction of several successive actions of a subject at the same time. Marinetti’s manifesto glorified the new technology of the automobile and the beauty of its speed, power, and movement. He exalted violence and conflict and called for the sweep-ing repudiation of traditional cultural, social, and political values and the destruction of such cultural institu-tions as museums and libraries.
There are several factors that determine whether a text is readable. When decid-ing what typeface should be used for a job, consideration should be given to the typeface and its x-height. It is important to understand how a block of text can express a message through its texture/color, therefore suiting a particular de-sign solution. Fonts set in the same size, same leading and column width will produce varying degrees of “color”.
72 pt
+09
rules
HELVETCA NEUEmax miedinger
x-height: large character width: average color: medium
XxhgITC NEW BASKERVILLEjohn baskerville
x-height: average character width: average color: average
Xxhg
9/12 9/12
10+
Futurism was first announced on February 20, 1909, when the Paris newspaper Le Figaro published a manifesto by the Italian poet and editor Filippo Tommaso Marinetti. The name Futurism, coined by Marinetti, reflected his emphasis on discarding what he conceived to be the static and irrelevant art of the past and celebrating change, original-ity, and innovation in culture and society. Futurism rejected traditions and glorified contemporary life, mainly by emphasizing two dominant themes, the machine and motion. The works were characterized by the depiction of several successive actions of a subject at the same time. Marinetti’s manifesto glorified the new technology of the automobile and the beauty of its speed, power, and movement. He exalted violence and conflict and called for the sweep-ing repudiation of traditional cultural, social, and political values and the destruction of such cultural institu-tions as museums and libraries.
Futurism was first announced on February 20, 1909, when the Paris newspaper Le Figaro published a manifesto by the Italian poet and editor Filippo Tommaso Marinetti. The name Futurism, coined by Marinetti, reflected his emphasis on discarding what he conceived to be the static and irrelevant art of the past and celebrating change, original-ity, and innovation in culture and society. Futurism rejected traditions and glorified contemporary life, mainly by emphasizing two dominant themes, the machine and motion. The works were characterized by the depiction of several successive actions of a subject at the same time. Marinetti’s manifesto glorified the new technology of the automobile and the beauty of its speed, power, and movement. He exalted violence and conflict and called for the sweep-ing repudiation of traditional cultural, social, and political values and the destruction of such cultural institu-tions as museums and libraries.
x-height: average character width: average color: average
In typography, color can also describe the balance between black and white on the page of text. A typeface’s color is determined by stroke width, x-height, character width and serif styles.
72 pt
+11
rules
CLARENDONrobert besley
x-height: average character width: large color: dark
Xxhg
9/12
FUTURApaul renner
x-height: averagecharacter width: largecolor: light
Xxhg
9/12
12+
Futurism was first announced on February 20, 1909, when the Paris newspaper Le Figaro published a manifesto by the Italian poet and editor Filippo Tommaso Marinetti. The name Futurism, coined by Marinetti, reflected his emphasis on discarding what he conceived to be the static and irrelevant art of the past and celebrating change, original-ity, and innovation in culture and society. Futurism rejected traditions and glorified contemporary life, mainly by emphasizing two dominant themes, the machine and motion. The works were characterized by the depiction of several successive actions of a subject at the same time. Marinetti’s manifesto glorified the new technology of the automobile and the beauty of its speed, power, and movement. He exalted violence and conflict and called for the sweep-ing repudiation of traditional cultural, social, and political values and the destruction of such cultural institu-tions as museums and libraries.
Futurism was first announced on February 20, 1909, when the Paris newspaper Le Figaro published a manifesto by the Italian poet and editor Filippo Tommaso Marinetti. The name Futurism, coined by Marinetti, reflected his emphasis on discarding what he conceived to be the static and irrelevant art of the past and celebrating change, original-ity, and innovation in culture and society. Futurism rejected traditions and glorified contemporary life, mainly by emphasizing two dominant themes, the machine and motion. The works were characterized by the depiction of several successive actions of a subject at the same time. Marinetti’s manifesto glorified the new technology of the automobile and the beauty of its speed, power, and movement. He exalted violence and conflict and called for the sweep-ing repudiation of traditional cultural, social, and political values and the destruction of such cultural institu-tions as museums and libraries.
Xxhg 72 pt
As a designer, if you are only asked to make the text readable on the page the following questions should be asked...
Who is to read it?+ Someone that wants to read it? Some-one that has to read it?How will it be read?+ Quickly. In passing. Focused. Near. Far.
+13
rules
INTERSTATEtobais frere-jones
x-height: large character width: narrow color: dark
Xxhg
9/12
BEMBOstanley morrison
Xxhg
9/12 Futurism was first announced on February 20, 1909, when the Paris newspaper Le Figaro published a manifesto by the Italian poet and editor Filippo Tommaso Marinetti. The name Futurism, coined by Marinetti, reflected his emphasis on discarding what he conceived to be the static and irrelevant art of the past and celebrating change, original-ity, and innovation in culture and society. Futurism rejected traditions and glorified contemporary life, mainly by emphasizing two dominant themes, the machine and motion. The works were characterized by the depiction of several successive actions of a subject at the same time. Marinetti’s manifesto glorified the new technology of the automobile and the beauty of its speed, power, and movement. He exalted violence and conflict and called for the sweep-ing repudiation of traditional cultural, social, and political values and the destruction of such cultural institu-tions as museums and libraries.
Futurism was first announced on February 20, 1909, when the Paris newspaper Le Figaro published a manifesto by the Italian poet and editor Filippo Tommaso Marinetti. The name Futurism, coined by Marinetti, reflected his emphasis on discarding what he conceived to be the static and irrelevant art of the past and celebrating change, original-ity, and innovation in culture and society. Futurism rejected traditions and glorified contemporary life, mainly by emphasizing two dominant themes, the machine and motion. The works were characterized by the depiction of several successive actions of a subject at the same time. Marinetti’s manifesto glorified the new technology of the automobile and the beauty of its speed, power, and movement. He exalted violence and conflict and called for the sweep-ing repudiation of traditional cultural, social, and political values and the destruction of such cultural institu-tions as museums and libraries.
14+
x-height: small character width: wide color: light
rules
Xxhg72 ptAKZIDENZ GROTESQUEgunter gerhand lange
x-height: large character width: narrow color: dark
VOLTAfrederic w. goudy
x-height: average character width: large color: dark
Xxhg
9/12 9/12
+15
Futurism was first announced on February 20, 1909, when the Paris newspaper Le Figaro published a manifesto by the Italian poet and editor Filippo Tommaso Marinetti. The name Futurism, coined by Marinetti, reflected his emphasis on discarding what he conceived to be the static and irrelevant art of the past and celebrating change, original-ity, and innovation in culture and society. Futurism rejected traditions and glorified contemporary life, mainly by emphasizing two dominant themes, the machine and motion. The works were characterized by the depiction of several successive actions of a subject at the same time. Marinetti’s manifesto glorified the new technology of the automobile and the beauty of its speed, power, and movement. He exalted violence and conflict and called for the sweep-ing repudiation of traditional cultural, social, and political values and the destruction of such cultural institu-tions as museums and libraries.
Futurism was first announced on February 20, 1909, when the Paris newspaper Le Figaro published a manifesto by the Italian poet and editor Filippo Tommaso Marinetti. The name Futurism, coined by Marinetti, reflected his emphasis on discarding what he conceived to be the static and irrelevant art of the past and celebrating change, original-ity, and innovation in culture and society. Futurism rejected traditions and glorified contemporary life, mainly by emphasizing two dominant themes, the machine and motion. The works were characterized by the depiction of several successive actions of a subject at the same time. Marinetti’s manifesto glorified the new technology of the automobile and the beauty of its speed, power, and movement. He exalted violence and conflict and called for the sweep-ing repudiation of traditional cultural, social, and political values and the destruction of such cultural institu-tions as museums and libraries.
x-height: small character width: wide color: light
NEWS GOTHICmorris fuller benton
x-height: tall character width: average color: medium
XxhgMEMPHISrudolph weiss
x-height: averagecharacter width: largecolor: dark
Xxhg
9/12 9/12 Futurism was first announced on February 20, 1909, when the Paris newspaper Le Figaro published a manifesto by the Italian poet and editor Filippo Tommaso Marinetti. The name Futurism, coined by Marinetti, reflected his emphasis on discarding what he conceived to be the static and irrelevant art of the past and celebrating change, original-ity, and innovation in culture and society. Futurism rejected traditions and glorified contemporary life, mainly by emphasizing two dominant themes, the machine and motion. The works were characterized by the depiction of several successive actions of a subject at the same time. Marinetti’s manifesto glorified the new technology of the automobile and the beauty of its speed, power, and movement. He exalted violence and conflict and called for the sweep-ing repudiation of traditional cultural, social, and political values and the destruction of such cultural institu-tions as museums and libraries.
Futurism was first announced on February 20, 1909, when the Paris newspaper Le Figaro published a manifesto by the Italian poet and editor Filippo Tommaso Marinetti. The name Futurism, coined by Marinetti, reflected his emphasis on discarding what he conceived to be the static and irrelevant art of the past and celebrating change, original-ity, and innovation in culture and society. Futurism rejected traditions and glorified contemporary life, mainly by emphasizing two dominant themes, the machine and motion. The works were characterized by the depiction of several successive actions of a subject at the same time. Marinetti’s manifesto glorified the new technology of the automobile and the beauty of its speed, power, and movement. He exalted violence and conflict and called for the sweep-ing repudiation of traditional cultural, social, and political values and the destruction of such cultural institu-tions as museums and libraries.
16+
rules
GARAMONDclaude garamond
x-height: small character width: average color: light
Xxhg
9/12
SCALA SANSmartin majoor
x-height: averagecharacter width: average color: medium
Xxhg
9/12
72 pt
Futurism was first announced on February 20, 1909, when the Paris newspaper Le Figaro published a manifesto by the Italian poet and editor Filippo Tommaso Marinetti. The name Futurism, coined by Marinetti, reflected his emphasis on discarding what he conceived to be the static and irrelevant art of the past and celebrating change, original-ity, and innovation in culture and society. Futurism rejected traditions and glorified contemporary life, mainly by emphasizing two dominant themes, the machine and motion. The works were characterized by the depiction of several successive actions of a subject at the same time. Marinetti’s manifesto glorified the new technology of the automobile and the beauty of its speed, power, and movement. He exalted violence and conflict and called for the sweep-ing repudiation of traditional cultural, social, and political values and the destruction of such cultural institu-tions as museums and libraries.
Futurism was first announced on February 20, 1909, when the Paris newspaper Le Figaro published a manifesto by the Italian poet and editor Filippo Tommaso Marinetti. The name Futurism, coined by Marinetti, reflected his emphasis on discarding what he conceived to be the static and irrelevant art of the past and celebrating change, original-ity, and innovation in culture and society. Futurism rejected traditions and glorified contemporary life, mainly by emphasizing two dominant themes, the machine and motion. The works were characterized by the depiction of several successive actions of a subject at the same time. Marinetti’s manifesto glorified the new technology of the automobile and the beauty of its speed, power, and movement. He exalted violence and conflict and called for the sweep-ing repudiation of traditional cultural, social, and political values and the destruction of such cultural institu-tions as museums and libraries.
+17
TRADE GOTHICjackson burke
x-height: large character width: narrow color: light
FILOSOFIA zuzanna licko
x-height: small character width: narrow color: light
XxhgXxhg
9/12 9/12 Futurism was first announced on February 20, 1909, when the Paris newspaper Le Figaro published a manifesto by the Italian poet and editor Filippo Tommaso Marinetti. The name Futurism, coined by Marinetti, reflected his emphasis on discarding what he conceived to be the static and irrelevant art of the past and celebrating change, original-ity, and innovation in culture and society. Futurism rejected traditions and glorified contemporary life, mainly by emphasizing two dominant themes, the machine and motion. The works were characterized by the depiction of several successive actions of a subject at the same time. Marinetti’s manifesto glorified the new technology of the automobile and the beauty of its speed, power, and movement. He exalted violence and conflict and called for the sweep-ing repudiation of traditional cultural, social, and political values and the destruction of such cultural institu-tions as museums and libraries.
Futurism was first announced on February 20, 1909, when the Paris newspaper Le Figaro published a manifesto by the Italian poet and editor Filippo Tommaso Marinetti. The name Futurism, coined by Marinetti, reflected his emphasis on discarding what he conceived to be the static and irrelevant art of the past and celebrating change, original-ity, and innovation in culture and society. Futurism rejected traditions and glorified contemporary life, mainly by emphasizing two dominant themes, the machine and motion. The works were characterized by the depiction of several successive actions of a subject at the same time. Marinetti’s manifesto glorified the new technology of the automobile and the beauty of its speed, power, and movement. He exalted violence and conflict and called for the sweep-ing repudiation of traditional cultural, social, and political values and the destruction of such cultural institu-tions as museums and libraries.
18+
x-height: small character width: narrow color: light
rules
72 ptGILL SANSeric gill
x-height: average character width: narrow color: dark
DIDOTfirmin didot
x-height: average character width: average color: light
XxhgXxhg
9/12 9/12 Futurism was first announced on February 20, 1909, when the Paris newspaper Le Figaro published a manifesto by the Italian poet and editor Filippo Tommaso Marinetti. The name Futurism, coined by Marinetti, reflected his emphasis on discarding what he conceived to be the static and irrelevant art of the past and celebrating change, original-ity, and innovation in culture and society. Futurism rejected traditions and glorified contemporary life, mainly by emphasizing two dominant themes, the machine and motion. The works were characterized by the depiction of several successive actions of a subject at the same time. Marinetti’s manifesto glorified the new technology of the automobile and the beauty of its speed, power, and movement. He exalted violence and conflict and called for the sweep-ing repudiation of traditional cultural, social, and political values and the destruction of such cultural institu-tions as museums and libraries.
Futurism was first announced on February 20, 1909, when the Paris newspaper Le Figaro published a manifesto by the Italian poet and editor Filippo Tommaso Marinetti. The name Futurism, coined by Marinetti, reflected his emphasis on discarding what he conceived to be the static and irrelevant art of the past and celebrating change, original-ity, and innovation in culture and society. Futurism rejected traditions and glorified contemporary life, mainly by emphasizing two dominant themes, the machine and motion. The works were characterized by the depiction of several successive actions of a subject at the same time. Marinetti’s manifesto glorified the new technology of the automobile and the beauty of its speed, power, and movement. He exalted violence and conflict and called for the sweep-ing repudiation of traditional cultural, social, and political values and the destruction of such cultural institu-tions as museums and libraries.
+19
hyphenation
HYPHENATION
Follow these rules to
correctly use hyphenation.
22+
Never leave widows and orphans bereft on the page. Avoid both of these situations. If you have editing privileges, rewrite the copy, or at least add or delete a word or two. Sometimes you can remove spacing from the letters, words, or lines, depend-ing on which program you’re working in. Sometimes widening a margin just a hair will do it. But it must be done. Widows and orphans on a page are wrong.
When a paragraph ends and leaves fewer than seven characters (not words, charac-ters) on the last line, that line is called a widow. Worse than leaving one word at the end of a line is leaving part of a word, the other part being paraphrased on the line above.
When the last line of a paragraph, be it ever so long, won’t fit at the bottom of a column and must end itself at the top of the next column, that is an orphan. You must ALWAYS correct this.
In typography, rivers, or rivers of white, are visually unattractive gaps appearing to run down a paragraph of text. They can occur with any spacing, though they are most noticeable with wide word spaces caused by either full text justification or monospaced fonts.
hyphenation
widows/orphans
In unjustified text, the text block is set with normal letter and word spacing. Because of the even word spacing the text will have an even texture – no large spaces between words. The lines will naturally vary in length. a ragged text block can integrate with the layout and add visual interest to the page. The difficulty is making the ragged edge have a pleasing silhouette. When the first line in the text is longer than the second, it becomes separate from the layout and creates a box-like shape. This destroys one of the advantages of unjustified text. The ragged edge needs to have a life, but a narrow column can be less active. Another advantage to ragged text is less hyphenation is needed. There-fore, names, dates or words which are normally read together can stay together.
+23
DON’T HYPHENATE HEADLINES. THAT’S A LAW.+ Don Quixote de la Man- cha
ALSO, WATCH WHERE THE FIRST LINE OF A TWO-HEADLINE ENDS—DOES IT CREATE A SILLY OR MISLEADING PHRASE? FIX IT.
+ Professor and The- rapist to Lecture
DON’T LEAVE WIDOWS (VERY SHORT LAST LINES) IN HEADLINES.
+ Man Walks Barefoot Across Bay Bridge
FIX IT EITHER WAY, OR REWRITE!
+ Man walks barefoot across Bay Bridge+ Man walks barefoot across Bay Bridge
24+
hyphenation
+ avoid hyphenating or line brakes of names and proper nouns+ how the text is read avoid widows (one word on the last line of a paragraph)+ avoid ending consecutive lines with the same word+ leave at least 2 characters on the line and 3 following+ avoid beginning consecutive lines with the same word+ never hyphenate a words in a headline and avoid hyphenation in a callout+ avoid ending lines with the words: the, of, at, a, by..
+25
CASING ADDERBAT
Heresy borsch-boil starry a
boarder borsch boil gam
plate lung, lung a gore in-
ner ladle wan-hearse torn
coiled Mutt-fill.
Mutt-fill worsen mush of-
fter torn, butted hatter putty
gut borsch-boil tame, an off
oiler pliers honor tame, door
moist cerebrated worse Cas-
ing. Casing worsted sickened
basement, any hatter betting
orphanage off .526 (fife toe
sex).
Casing worse gut lurking
an furry poplar—spatially
wetter gull coiled Any-bally.
Any-bally worse Casing’s
sweat-hard, any harpy cobble
wandered toe gat merit,
bought Casing worse tow pore
toe becalm Any-bally’s
horsebarn. (Boil pliers honor
Mutt-fill tame dint gat mush
offer celery; infect, day gut
nosing atoll.)
Butt less gat earn wetter star-
ry.
Heresy borsch-boil starry
a boarder borsch boil gam
plate lung, lung a gore inner
ladle wan-hearse torn coiled
Mutt-fill.
Mutt-fill worsen mush
offter torn, butted hatter putty
gut borsch-boil tame, an
off oiler pliers honor tame,
door moist cerebrated worse
Casing. Casing worsted sick-
ened basement, any hatter
betting orphanage off .526
(fife toe sex).
Casing worse gut lurking
an furry poplar—spatially
wetter gull coiled Any-bally.
Any-bally worse Casing’s
sweat-hard, any harpy cobble
wandered toe gat merit, bought
Casing worse tow pore toe
becalm Any-bally’s horsebarn.
(Boil pliers honor Mutt-fill
tame dint gat mush offer celery;
infect, day gut nosing atoll.)
Butt less gat earn wetter
starry.
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
CASING ADDER BAT
story by Howard Chace26+
hyphenation
What are bad line breaks anyway?+ Look for bad line breaks throughout ever line of body copy. Of course, do this only on final copy, after all editing has been done. Here are several examples of the sorts of thigns to look for...
1 Justify the headlines so it stays on one line. 2 Use a line break (Shift Return) to bump “a” down to the next line, where it fits very nicely. 3 Kern the line a tiny bit to bring the rest of the word up. 4 Type a dischy in front of the wrod to bump it down. 5 Never hyphenate a person’s name. I had to go up a few lines, bump “off” down, which bumped the other line ending down. 6 Fix Widow. 7 There is plenty of room to squeeze “bought” on this line, perhaps by kerning the line a tiny bit. 8 “Horsebarn” is a good, long word that could be hyphenated; type a dischy. Better yet, when “brought” moved up, it gave enough room to move “horsebarn” up. If not, try opening the text box a wee bit. 9 Edit: to get rid of that terrible widow, exchange a short word for a long word.
+27
alignments
“Right and wrong do not
exist in graphic design.
There is only effective and
non-effective communica-
tion.” — Peter Bilak
ALIGNMENTS
30+
If someone insists that fully justified text is better than left-aligned text, tell them they are wrong. If someone else tells you that left-aligned text is better than justified text, tell them they are wrong.
If they are both wrong, then what’s right? Alignment is only a small piece of the puz-zle. What works for one design might be totally inappropriate for another layout. As with all layouts, it depends on the purpose of the piece, the audience and its expecta-tions, the fonts, the margins and white space, and other elements on the page. The most appropriate choice is the alignment that works for that particular design.
alignments
general advice
+31
Often considered more
formal, less friendly than
left-aligned text.
ALIGNMENTS
32+
Traditionally, many books, newsletters, and newspapers use full-justification as a means of packing as much information onto the page as possible to cut down on the number of pages needed. While the alignment was chosen out of necessity, it has become so familiar to us that the same types of publications set in left-aligned text would look odd, even unpleasant.
You may find that fully-justified text is a necessity either due to space constraints or expectations of the audience. If possible though, try to break up dense blocks of texts with ample subheadings, margins, or graphics.
+ Often considered more formal, less friendly than left-aligned text.+ Usually allows for more characters per line, packing more information into the same amount of space (than the same text set left-aligned).+ May require extra attention to word and character spacing and hyphenation to avoid unsightly rivers of white space running through the text.+ Some people are naturally drawn to the “neatness” of text that lines up perfectly on the left and right.+ May be more familiar to readers in some types of publications (books and newspapers).
alignments
justified text
+33
ALIGNMENTS
When in doubt,
don’t center it.
34+
There is nothing inherently wrong with centered text. As with ragged right or fully-justified text alignment, what works for one design might be totally inappropriate for another layout. There are simply fewer situations where centered text is appropri-ate. When in doubt, don’t center it.
As with all layouts, alignment depends on the purpose of the piece, the audience and its expectations, the fonts, the margins and white space, and other elements on the page. The most appropriate choice is the alignment that works for that particular design.
No matter what alignment you use, remem-ber to pay close attention to hyphenation and word/character spacing as well to in-sure that your text is as readable as possible.
There will undoubtedly be well-meaning friends, business associates, clients, and others who will question your choices. Be prepared to explain why you chose the alignment you did and be prepared to change it (and make necessary adjustments to keep it looking good) if the person with final approval still is unsatisfied.
alignments
+35
ALIGNMENTS
Often considered more
informal, friendlier than
justified text.
36+
+ Often considered more informal, friend-lier than justified text.+ The ragged right edge adds an element of white space.+ May require extra attention to hyphen-ation to keep right margin from becoming too ragged.+ Generally, type set left-aligned is easier to work with (i.e. requires less time, atten-tion, and tweaking from the designer to make it look good).
alignments
left-aligned, ragged right
+37
justification
40+
DINthe words really crowd together, and it becomes difficult to distin-guish a beginning and end.
minimum: 50%maximum: 50%desired: 50%
The only time you can safely get away with justifying text is if your type is small enough and your line is long enough, as in books where the text goes all the way across the page. If your line is shorter, as in newsletter, or if you don’t have many words on the line, than as the type aligns to the margins the words space themselves to accommodate it. It usually looks awkward. You’ve seen newspaper columns where all text is justified, often with a word stretching all the way across the column, or a little word on either side of the column with a big gap in the middle. Gross. But that’s what can happen with justified type. When you do it, the effect might not be as radical as the newspaper column, but if your lines are relatively short, you will inevitably end up with uncomfortable gaps in some lines, while other lines will be all squished together.
When your work comes out of the printer, turn it upside down and squint at it. The rivers will be very easy to spot. Get rid of them. Try squinting at the example on the bottom of the previous page.
Here is a general guideline for determin-ing if your line length is long enough to satisfactorily justify the text: the line length in picas should be about twice the point size of the type; that is, if the type you are using is 12 point, the line length should be at least 24 picas (24 pi-cas is 4 inches-simply divide the number
9/12 of picas by 6, as there are 6 picas per inch). Thus 9-point type should be on an 18-pica line (3 inches) before you try to justify it, and 18-point type should be on a 36-pica line (6 inches). The rulers in most programs can be changed to picas, if you like.
Justified text was the style for many years-we grew up on it. But there has been a great deal of research done on readability (how easy something is to read) and it shoes that those disruptive, inconsistent gaps between the words inhibit the flow of reading. Besides, they look dumb. Keep your eyes open as you look at professionally printed work (magazines, newsletters, annual reports, journals) and you’ll find there’s a very strong trend to align type on the left and leave the right ragged.
MELIORthe text is a little too tight, and the letters start to blend into each other
minimum: 50%maximum: 50%desired: 50%
The only time you can safely get away with justifying text is if your type is small enough and your line is long enough, as in books where the text goes all the way across the page. If your line is shorter, as in newsletter, or if you don’t have many words on the line, than as the type aligns to the margins the words space themselves to accom-modate it. It usually looks awkward. You’ve seen newspaper columns where all text is justified, often with a word stretching all the way across the col-umn, or a little word on either side of the column with a big gap in the middle. Gross. But that’s what can hap-pen with justified type. When you do it, the effect might not be as radical as the newspaper column, but if your lines are relatively short, you will inevitably end up with uncomfortable gaps in some lines, while other lines will be all squished together.
When your work comes out of the printer, turn it upside down and squint at it. The rivers will be very easy to spot. Try squinting at the example on the bot-tom of the previous page.
Here is a general guideline for determin-ing if your line length is long enough to satisfactorily justify the text: the line length in picas should be about twice the point size of the type; that is, if the type you are using is 12 point, the line
9/12 length should be at least 24 picas (24 picas is 4 inches-simply divide the number of picas by 6, as there are 6 pi-cas per inch). Thus 9-point type should be on an 18-pica line (3 inches) before you try to justify it, and 18-point type should be on a 36-pica line (6 inches). The rulers in most programs can be changed to picas, if you like.
Justified text was the style for many years-we grew up on it. But there has been a great deal of research done on readability (how easy something is to read) and it shoes that those disruptive, inconsistent gaps between the words inhibit the flow of reading. Besides, they look dumb. Keep your eyes open as you look at professionally printed work (magazines, newsletters, an-nual reports, journals) and you’ll find there’s a very strong trend to align type on the left and leave the right ragged.
+41
justification
DINtoo many rivers are created with this justification and the spacing really starts to become uneven.
minimum: 100%maximum: 200%desired: 300%
The only time you can safely get away with justifying text is if your type is small enough and your line is long enough, as in books where the text goes all the way across the page. If your line is shorter, as in newsletter, or if you don’t have many words on the line, than as the type aligns to the margins the words space themselves to accommodate it. It usually looks awkward. You’ve seen newspaper columns where all text is justified, often with a word stretch-ing all the way across the column, or a little word on either side of the column with a big gap in the middle. Gross. But that’s what can happen with justified type. When you do it, the effect might not be as radical as the newspaper column, but if your lines are short, you will inevita-bly end up with uncomfortable gaps in some lines, while other lines will be all squished together.
When your work comes out of the printer, turn it upside down and squint at it. The rivers will be very easy to spot. Get rid of them. Try squinting at the example on the bot-tom of the previous page.
Here is a general guideline for determining if your line length is long enough to satisfactorily justify the text: the line length in picas
9/12 should be about twice the point size of the type; that is, if the type you are using is 12 point, the line length should be at least 24 picas (24 picas is 4 inches-simply divide the number of picas by 6, as there are 6 picas per inch). Thus 9-point type should be on an 18-pica line (3 inches) before you try to justify it, and 18-point type should be on 36-pica line (6 inches). The rulers in most programs can be changed to picas, if you like.
Justified text was the style for many years-we grew up on it. But there has been a great deal of research done on readability (how easy some-thing is to read) and it shoes that those disruptive, inconsistent gaps between the words inhibit the flow of reading. Besides, they look dumb. Keep your eyes open as you look at professionally printed work (maga-zines, newsletters, annual reports, journals) and you’ll find there’s a very strong trend to align type on the left and leave the right ragged.
42+
justification
MELIORthere is far too much uneven spac-ing, widows, and orphans for this setting to work.
minimum: 100%maximum: 200%desired: 300%
The only time you can safely get away with justifying text is if your type is small enough and your line is long enough, as in books where the text goes all the way across the page. If your line is shorter, as in newsletter, or if you don’t have many words on the line, than as the type aligns to the margins the words space themselves to accommodate it. It usually looks awkward. You’ve seen newspaper columns where all text is justi-fied, often with a word stretching all the way across the column, or a little word on either side of the column with a big gap in the middle. Gross. But that’s what can happen with justified type. When you do it, the effect might not be as radical as the newspa-per column, but if your lines are relatively short, you will inevitably end up with uncomfortable gaps in some lines, while other lines will be all squished together.
When your work comes out of the printer, turn it upside down and squint at it. The rivers will be very easy to spot. Get rid of them. Try squinting at the example on the bottom of the previous page.
Here is a general guideline for determining if your line length is
9/12 long enough to satisfactorily justify the text: the line length in picas should be about twice the point size of the type; that is, if the type you are using is 12 point, the line length should be at least 24 picas (24 picas is 4 inches-sim-ply divide the number of picas by 6, as there are 6 picas per inch). Thus 9-point type should be on an 18-pica line (3 inches) before you try to justify it, and 18-point type should be on a 36-pica line (6 inches). The rulers in most pro-grams can be changed to picas, if you like.
Justified text was the style for many years-we grew up on it. But there has been a great deal of research done on readability (how easy something is to read) and it shoes that those disruptive, incon-sistent gaps between the words in-hibit the flow of reading. Besides, they look dumb. Keep your eyes open as you look at professionally printed work (magazines, newslet-ters, annual reports, journals) and you’ll find there’s a very strong trend to align type on the left and leave the right ragged.
+43
DINthe type is still spaced out too far, and rivers become more common.
minimum: 280%maximum: 300%desired: 450%
The only time you can safely get away with justifying text is if your type is small enough and your line is long enough, as in books where the text goes all the way across the page. If your line is shorter, as in newsletter, or if you don’t have many words on the line, than as the type aligns to the margins the words space themselves to accommodate it. It usually looks awkward. You’ve seen newspaper columns where all text is justified, often with a word stretching all the way across the column, or a little word on either side of the column with a big gap in the middle. Gross. But that’s what can happen with justified type. When you do it, the effect might not be as radical as the newspaper column, but if your lines are relatively short, you will inevitably end up with uncomfort-able gaps in some lines, while other lines will be all squished together.
When your work comes out of the printer, turn it upside down and squint at it. The rivers will be very easy to spot. Get rid of them. Try squinting at the exam-ple on the bottom of the previous page.
9/12 Here is a general guideline for determining if your line length is long enough to satisfactorily justify the text: the line length in picas should be about twice the point size of the type; that is, if the type you are using is 12 point, the line length should be at least 24 picas (24 picas is 4 inches-simply divide the number of picas by 6, as there are 6 picas per inch). Thus 9-point type should be on an 18-pica line (3 inches) before you try to justify it, and 18-point type should be on a 36-pica line (6 inches). The rulers in most programs can be changed to picas, if you like.
Justified text was the style for many years-we grew up on it. But there has been a great deal of research done on readability (how easy something is to read) and it shoes that those disrup-tive, inconsistent gaps between the words inhibit the flow of reading. Besides, they look dumb. Keep your eyes open as you look at professionally printed work (magazines, newsletters, annual reports, journals) and you’ll find there’s a very strong trend to align type on the left and leave the right ragged.
44+
justification
MELIORstill, too much spacing between the words and too many rivers.
minimum: 280%maximum: 300%desired: 450%
The only time you can safely get away with justifying text is if your type is small enough and your line is long enough, as in books where the text goes all the way across the page. If your line is shorter, as in newsletter, or if you don’t have many words on the line, than as the type aligns to the margins the words space them-selves to accommodate it. It usually looks awkward. You’ve seen newspaper columns where all text is justified, often with a word stretching all the way across the column, or a little word on either side of the column with a big gap in the middle. Gross. But that’s what can happen with justified type. When you do it, the effect might not be as radical as the newspaper column, but if your lines are relatively short, you will inevitably end up with un-comfortable gaps in some lines, while other lines will be all squished together.
When your work comes out of the printer, turn it upside down and squint at it. The rivers will be very easy to spot. Get rid of them. Try squinting at the example on the bottom of the previous page.
9/12 Here is a general guideline for determining if your line length is long enough to satisfactorily justify the text: the line length in picas should be about twice the point size of the type; that is, if the type you are using is 12 point, the line length should be at least 24 picas (24 picas is 4 inches-simply divide the number of picas by 6, as there are 6 picas per inch). Thus 9-point type should be on an 18-pica line (3 inches) before you try to justify it, and 18-point type should be on a 36-pica line (6 inches). The rul-ers in most programs can be changed to picas, if you like.
Justified text was the style for many years-we grew up on it. But there has been a great deal of research done on readability (how easy something is to read) and it shoes that those disrup-tive, inconsistent gaps between the words inhibit the flow of reading. Besides, they look dumb. Keep your eyes open as you look at professionally print-ed work (magazines, newsletters, annual reports, journals) and you’ll find there’s a very strong trend to align type on the left and leave the right ragged.
+45
DINthe type is uncomfortably close and words start to feel rushed.
minimum: 20%maximum: 30%desired: 40%
The only time you can safely get away with justifying text is if your type is small enough and your line is long enough, as in books where the text goes all the way across the page. If your line is shorter, as in newsletter, or if you don’t have many words on the line, than as the type aligns to the margins the words space themselves to accommodate it. It usually looks awk-ward. You’ve seen newspaper columns where all text is justified, often with a word stretching all the way across the column, or a little word on either side of the column with a big gap in the middle. Gross. But that’s what can happen with justified type. When you do it, the effect might not be as radical as the newspaper column, but if your lines are relatively short, you will inevitably end up with uncomfortable gaps in some lines, while other lines will be all squished together.
When your work comes out of the printer, turn it upside down and squint at it. The rivers will be very easy to spot. Get rid of them. Try squinting at the example on the bottom of the previous page.
Here is a general guideline for determin-ing if your line length is long enough to sat-isfactorily justify the text: the line length in picas should be about twice the point size of the type; that is, if the type you are using is 12 point, the line length should be at least 24 picas (24 picas is 4 inches-simply divide the number of picas by 6, as there
9/12 are 6 picas per inch). Thus 9-point type should be on an 18-pica line (3 inches) be-fore you try to justify it, and 18-point type should be on a 36-pica line (6 inches). The rulers in most programs can be changed to picas, if you like.
Justified text was the style for many years-we grew up on it. But there has been a great deal of research done on readability (how easy something is to read) and it shoes that those disruptive, inconsistent gaps between the words inhibit the flow of reading. Besides, they look dumb. Keep your eyes open as you look at professionally printed work (magazines, newsletters, annual reports, journals) and you’ll find there’s a very strong trend to align type on the left and leave the right ragged.
46+
justification
MELIORthe spacing is far too close for the reader to feel comfortable and let-ters start to combine.
minimum: 20%maximum: 30%desired: 40%
The only time you can safely get away with justifying text is if your type is small enough and your line is long enough, as in books where the text goes all the way across the page. If your line is shorter, as in newsletter, or if you don’t have many words on the line, than as the type aligns to the margins the words space themselves to accommodate it. It usually looks awkward. You’ve seen newspa-per columns where all text is justified, often with a word stretching all the way across the column, or a little word on either side of the column with a big gap in the middle. Gross. But that’s what can happen with justified type. When you do it, the effect might not be as radical as the newspaper column, but if your lines are relatively short, you will inevitably end up with uncomfortable gaps in some lines, while other lines will be all squished together.
When your work comes out of the printer, turn it upside down and squint at it. The rivers will be very easy to spot. Get rid of them. Try squinting at the example on the bottom of the previous page.
Here is a general guideline for determin-ing if your line length is long enough to satisfactorily justify the text: the line length in picas should be about twice the point size of the type; that is, if the type you are using is 12 point, the line length should be at least 24 picas (24 picas is 4
9/12 inches-simply divide the number of picas by 6, as there are 6 picas per inch). Thus 9-point type should be on an 18-pica line (3 inches) before you try to justify it, and 18-point type should be on a 36-pica line (6 inches). The rulers in most programs can be changed to picas, if you like.
Justified text was the style for many years-we grew up on it. But there has been a great deal of research done on readability (how easy something is to read) and it shoes that those disruptive, inconsistent gaps between the words inhibit the flow of reading. Besides, they look dumb. Keep your eyes open as you look at professionally printed work (magazines, newsletters, annual reports, journals) and you’ll find there’s a very strong trend to align type on the left and leave the right ragged.
+47
DINthis justification is a little nicer, although some rivers are created and awkward spacing.
minimum: 85%maximum: 110%desired: 250%
The only time you can safely get away with justifying text is if your type is small enough and your line is long enough, as in books where the text goes all the way across the page. If your line is shorter, as in newsletter, or if you don’t have many words on the line, than as the type aligns to the margins the words space themselves to accommodate it. It usually looks awk-ward. You’ve seen newspaper columns where all text is justified, often with a word stretching all the way across the column, or a little word on either side of the column with a big gap in the middle. Gross. But that’s what can happen with justified type. When you do it, the effect might not be as radical as the newspaper column, but if your lines are relatively short, you will inevitably end up with uncomfortable gaps in some lines, while other lines will be all squished together.
When your work comes out of the printer, turn it upside down and squint at it. The rivers will be very easy to spot. Get rid of them. Try squinting at the example on the bottom of the previ-ous page.
Here is a general guideline for de-termining if your line length is long enough to satisfactorily justify the text: the line length in picas should be about twice the point size of the type; that is,
9/12 if the type you are using is 12 point, the line length should be at least 24 picas (24 picas is 4 inches-simply di-vide the number of picas by 6, as there are 6 picas per inch). Thus 9-point type should be on an 18-pica line (3 inches) before you try to justify it, and 18-point type should be on a 36-pica line (6 inches). The rulers in most programs can be changed to picas, if you like.
Justified text was the style for many years-we grew up on it. But there has been a great deal of research done on readability (how easy something is to read) and it shoes that those disruptive, inconsistent gaps between the words inhibit the flow of reading. Besides, they look dumb. Keep your eyes open as you look at professionally printed work (magazines, newsletters, annual reports, journals) and you’ll find there’s a very strong trend to align type on the left and leave the right ragged.
EXPLORATION 548+
justification
MELIORthere is some loose spacing, but overall it’s better.
minimum: 85%maximum: 110%desired: 250%
The only time you can safely get away with justifying text is if your type is small enough and your line is long enough, as in books where the text goes all the way across the page. If your line is shorter, as in newsletter, or if you don’t have many words on the line, than as the type aligns to the margins the words space themselves to accommodate it. It usually looks awkward. You’ve seen newspaper col-umns where all text is justified, often with a word stretching all the way across the column, or a little word on either side of the column with a big gap in the middle. Gross. But that’s what can happen with justified type. When you do it, the effect might not be as radical as the newspaper col-umn, but if your lines are relatively short, you will inevitably end up with uncomfortable gaps in some lines, while other lines will be all squished together.
When your work comes out of the printer, turn it upside down and squint at it. The rivers will be very easy to spot. Get rid of them. Try squinting at the example on the bot-tom of the previous page.
Here is a general guideline for de-termining if your line length is long enough to satisfactorily justify the text: the line length in picas should
9/12 be about twice the point size of the type; that is, if the type you are using is 12 point, the line length should be at least 24 picas (24 picas is 4 inches-simply divide the number of picas by 6, as there are 6 picas per inch). Thus 9-point type should be on an 18-pica line (3 inches) before you try to justify it, and 18-point type should be on a 36-pica line (6 inches). The rulers in most programs can be changed to picas, if you like.
Justified text was the style for many years-we grew up on it. But there has been a great deal of research done on readability (how easy something is to read) and it shoes that those disrup-tive, inconsistent gaps between the words inhibit the flow of reading. Besides, they look dumb. Keep your eyes open as you look at profession-ally printed work (magazines, news-letters, annual reports, journals) and you’ll find there’s a very strong trend to align type on the left and leave the right ragged.
+49
combiningtypefaces
“There is no binding recipe
for type combinations. It
is a matter of typographic
sensitivity and experience.
Expert typographers, as
well as careless amateurs
permit themselves combi-
nations that would horrify
colleagues with more tradi-
tional sympathies.”
COMBINING TYPEFACES
52+
When combining serif and sans serif text fonts, one should try and match the charac-teristics of form and type color: proportion and x-heights.
Although there is not recipe there is a place to start: keep an eye on the charac-teristic shapes of the letterform. A well designed page contains no more than two different typefaces or four different type variations such as type size and bold or italic style. {Using 2 different serif fonts or 2 different sans serifs fonts in the same composition is never a good idea}.
combiningtypefaces
+53
FRUTIGER AND BEMBOhumanist san serif with old style
WORDS IN LIBERTYA Prologue to Futurism: Futurism was first announced on February 20, 1909, when the Paris newspaper Le Figaro published a manifesto by the Italian poet and editor Filippo Tommaso Marinetti. The name Futurism, coined by Mari-netti, reflected his emphasis on discarding what he conceived to be the static and irrelevant art of the past and cel- ebrating change, originality, and innovation in cul- ture and society. Futurism rejected traditions and glorified contemporary life, mainly by emphasizing two dominant themes, the machine and motion. The works were char-acterized by the depiction of several successive actions of a subject at the same time. Marinetti’s manifesto glorified the new tech- nology of the automobile and the beauty of its
8/11
aaBBee
GGgg
These two fonts work well together based on the stroke weight. The contrast in x-height made for a more interesting font combina-tion to increase hierarchy and to have a quick read, I used Frutiger 13-point for the header and Frutiger 8-point for the sub-head. I used Bembo 8-point for the body.
54+
ROTIS SAN SERIF AND GARAMOND grotesque san serif with old style
WORDS IN LIBERTYA Prologue to Futurism: Futurism was first an-nounced on February 20, 1909, when the Paris newspaper Le Figaro published a manifesto by the Italian poet and editor Filippo Tommaso Marinetti. The name Futurism, coined by Marinetti, reflected his emphasis on discarding what he conceived to be the static and irrelevant art of the past and cel- ebrating change, originality, and innovation in cul- ture and society. Futurism rejected traditions and glorified contemporary life, mainly by emphasizing two dominant themes, the machine and motion. The works were characterized by the depiction of several successive actions of a subject at the same time. Marinetti’s manifesto glorified the new tech- nology of the automobile and the beauty of its
8/11
aaBBee
GGgg
These two fonts work well together based on the varying stroke weight. The two together create a lighter text box and is easier to read. I used Rotis San Serif 13-point for the header and Fruitiger 8-point for the sub-head and Garamond 8-point for the body.
+55
combiningtypefaces
GILL SANS AND MRS EAVES geometric sans serif with transitional
WORDS IN LIBERTYA Prologue to Futurism: Futurism was first an-nounced on February 20, 1909, when the Paris newspaper Le Figaro published a manifesto by the Italian poet and editor Filippo Tommaso Mari-netti. The name Futurism, coined by Marinetti, reflected his emphasis on discarding what he con-ceived to be the static and irrelevant art of the past and cel- ebrating change, originality, and innova-tion in cul- ture and society. Futurism rejected traditions and glorified contemporary life, mainly by emphasizing two dominant themes, the ma-chine and motion. The works were characterized by the depiction of several successive actions of a subject at the same time. Marinetti’s manifesto glorified the new tech- nology of the automobile and the beauty of its
8/11
aaBBee
GGgg
These two fonts work well together based on the contrast in x-height. I used Gill Sans 13-point for the header and Mrs Eaves 8-point for the sub-head and Bembo 8-point for the body.
56+
FRUTIGER AND MELIOR humanist san serif with transitional
WORDS IN LIBERTYA Prologue to Futurism: Futurism was first announced on February 20, 1909, when the Paris newspaper Le Figaro published a manifesto by the Italian poet and editor Filippo Tommaso Marinetti. The name Futurism, coined by Marinetti, reflected his emphasis on discarding what he conceived to be the static and irrelevant art of the past and cel- ebrating change, originality, and innovation in cul- ture and society. Futurism rejected traditions and glorified contemporary life, mainly by emphasizing two dominant themes, the machine and motion. The works were characterized by the depiction of several successive actions of a subject at the same time. Marinetti’s manifesto glorified the new tech- nology of the automobile and the beauty of its
8/11
aaBBee
GGgg
Frutiger makes for a strong headline because of how bold it is, and melior’s curved serifs are welcoming to a large body of text. I used Frutiger 13-point for the head-er and Melior 8-point for the sub-head and Bembo 8-point for the body.
combiningtypefaces
+57
INTERSTATE AND FILOSOFIA geometric sans serif with modern
WORDS IN LIBERTYA Prologue to Futurism: Futurism was first announced on February 20, 1909, when the Paris newspaper Le Figaro published a manifesto by the Italian poet and editor Filippo Tommaso Marinetti. The name Futurism, coined by Marinetti, reflected his emphasis on discarding what he conceived to be the static and irrelevant art of the past and cel- ebrating change, originality, and innovation in cul- ture and society. Futurism rejected traditions and glorified contemporary life, mainly by emphasizing two dominant themes, the machine and motion. The works were characterized by the depiction of several successive actions of a subject at the same time. Marinetti’s manifesto glorified the new tech- nology of the automobile and the beauty of its
8/11
aaBBee
GGgg
Interstate and Filosofia make for an interest-ing combination because of how straight for-ward Interstate is and how distinct Filosofia’s bowls are. I used Interstate 13-point for the header and Filosofia 8-point for the sub-head and Bembo 8-point for the body.
58+
aaBBee
GGgg
NEWS GOTHIC AND DIDOTgrotesque san serif with modern
WORDS IN LIBERTYA Prologue to Futurism: Futurism was first announced on February 20, 1909, when the Paris newspaper Le Figaro published a manifesto by the Italian poet and editor Filippo Tommaso Marinetti. The name Fu-turism, coined by Marinetti, reflected his emphasis on discarding what he con-ceived to be the static and irrelevant art of the past and cel- ebrating change, original-ity, and innovation in cul- ture and society. Futurism rejected traditions and glorified contemporary life, mainly by emphasizing two dominant themes, the machine and motion. The works were characterized by the depiction of several successive actions of a subject at the same time. Marinetti’s manifesto glorified the new tech- nology of the automobile and the beauty of its
8/11
aaBBee
GGgg
News Gothic and Didot’s contrast in x-height made hierarchy much clearer and interest-ing. I used News Gothic 13-point for the header and Didot 8-point for the sub-head and Bembo 8-point for the body.
combiningtypefaces
+59
FUTURA AND NEW BASKERVILLE geometric sans serif with new transitional
WORDS IN LIBERTYA Prologue to Futurism: Futurism was first announced on February 20, 1909, when the Paris newspaper Le Figaro published a manifesto by the Italian poet and editor Filippo Tommaso Marinetti. The name Futurism, coined by Marinetti, reflected his emphasis on discarding what he conceived to be the static and irrelevant art of the past and cel- ebrating change, originality, and innovation in cul- ture and society. Futurism rejected traditions and glorified contemporary life, mainly by emphasizing two dominant themes, the machine and motion. The works were characterized by the depiction of several successive actions of a subject at the same time. Marinetti’s manifesto glorified the new tech- nology of the automobile and the beauty of its
8/11
aaBBee
GGgg
The contrasting stroke width and exaggera-tion of New Baskerville’s serif, really bring the two to an unlikely pair, but the two work well in contrast. I used Interstate 13-point for the header and Filosofia 8-point for the sub-head and Bembo 8-point for the body.
60+
TRADE GOTHIC AND CASLONgrotesque san serif with new transitional
WORDS IN LIBERTYA Prologue to Futurism: Futurism was first announced on February 20, 1909, when the Paris newspaper Le Figaro published a manifesto by the Italian poet and editor Filippo Tommaso Marinetti. The name Futurism, coined by Marinetti, reflected his emphasis on discarding what he conceived to be the static and irrelevant art of the past and cel- ebrating change, originality, and innovation in cul- ture and society. Futurism rejected traditions and glorified contemporary life, mainly by emphasizing two dominant themes, the machine and motion. The works were characterized by the depiction of several successive actions of a subject at the same time. Marinetti’s manifesto glorified the new tech- nology of the automobile and the beauty of its
8/11
aaBBee
GGgg
Trade Gothic’s taller x-height makes for a nice headline, and the thinness of
combiningtypefaces
+61
GILL SANS AND BELIZIO geometric sans serif with slab serif
WORDS IN LIBERTYA Prologue to Futurism: Futurism was first announced on February 20, 1909, when the Paris newspaper Le Figaro published a manifesto by the Italian poet and editor Filippo Tommaso Marinetti. The name Futurism, coined by Mari-netti, reflected his emphasis on discarding what he conceived to be the static and irrelevant art of the past and cel- ebrating change, originality, and innovation in cul- ture and society. Futurism rejected traditions and glorified contemporary life, mainly by emphasizing two dominant themes, the machine and motion. The works were char-acterized by the depiction of several successive actions of a subject at the same time. Marinetti’s manifesto glorified the new tech- nology of the automobile and the beauty of its
8/11
The variation between the two stroke widths and how narrow Belizio is compared to gill sans really contrasts each other in a nice way. I used Bembo 13-point for the header and Bembo 8-point for the sub-head and Gill Sans 8-point for the body.
aaBBee
GGgg
62+
META AND VOLTAhumanist san serif with slab serif
WORDS IN LIBERTYA Prologue to Futurism: Futurism was first announced on February 20, 1909, when the Paris newspaper Le Figaro published a manifesto by the Italian poet and editor Filippo Tommaso Marinetti. The name Futurism, coined by Marinetti, reflected his emphasis on discarding what he conceived to be the static and irrelevant art of the past and cel- ebrating change, originality, and innovation in cul- ture and society. Futurism rejected traditions and glorified contemporary life, mainly by empha-sizing two dominant themes, the machine and motion. The works were characterized by the depiction of several successive actions of a subject at the same time. Marinetti’s manifesto glorified the new tech- nology of the automo-bile and the beauty of its
8/11
Volta’s wideness adds a nice opposite to how thin Meta is. Volta’s serifs are also subtle enough that the two still work nicely together. I used Volta 13-point for the header and Volta 8-point for the sub-head and Meta 8-point for the body.
aaBBee
GGgg
combiningtypefaces
+63
quotes, dashes, apostrophes
opening double quote: “
option + [
closing double quote: ”
option + shift + ]
opening single quote: ‘
option + [
closing single quote: ’
option + shift + ]
QUOTES, DASHES, APOSTROPHES
66+
Use real quotation marks—never those gro-tesque generic marks that actually symbolize ditto/inch or foot marks: use “and”—not “and”. Most software applications will convert the typewriter quotes to the real quotes for you automatically as you type. Check the preferences for your applica-tion—you will find a check box to tell your application to automatically set something like “typographer’s quotes,” “smart quotes,” or “curly quotes.” Then as you type using the standard ditto key (“), the software will set the correct quotation marks for you.
But it is necessary to know how to set them yourself because sometimes the software doesn’t do it or does it wrong.
Bridge Clearance: 16’ 7”The young man stood 6’ 2”The length of the wall is 153’9”.
quotes, dashes, apostrophes
+67
hyphen: -
en dash: –
option + -
em dash: —
option + shift + -
QUOTES, DASHES, APOSTROPHES
68+
Never use two hyphens instead of a dash.Always use hyphens, en dashes, and em dashes appropriately.
Everyone knows what a hyphens is—that tiny little dash that belongs in some words, like mother-in-law, or in phone numbers. It’s also used to break a word at the end of a line, of course.
You might have been taught to use a double hyphen to indicate a dash (--), this is a typewriter convention because type-writers didn’t have the real dash used in professional typesetting. On a Mac, no one needs to use the double hyphen—we have a professional em dash, the long one, such as you see in this sentence. We also have an en dash, which is a little shorter than the em dash.
quotes, dashes, apostrophes
+69
Apostrophe: ’
option + shift + ]
QUOTES, DASHES, APOSTROPHES
70+
quotes, dashes, apostrophes
As as aside, people often are confused about where the apostrophe belongs. There are a couple of rules that work very well.
For possessives: Turn the phrase around. The apostrophe will be placed after what-ever word you end up with. For example, in the phrase “the boys’ camp,” to know where to place the apostrophe say to yourself, “The camp belongs to the boys.” The phrase the boy’s camp says “The camp belongs to the boy.”
“The big exception to this is “its.” “Its” used as a possessive never has an apostro-phe! The word it only has an apostrophe as a contraction—“it’s” always means “it is” or “it has.” Always.It may be easier to remember if you recall that yours, hers, and his don’t use apostro-phes—and neither should its.
For contractions: The apostrophe replaces the missing letter. For example: your’re always means you are; the apostrophe is replacing the a from are. That’s an easy way to distinguish it from your as in your house and to make sure you don’t say: Your going to the store.
As previously noted, it’s means “it is”; the apostrophe is indicating where the ‘i’ is left out. Don’t means “do not”; the apostrophe is indicating where the ‘o’ is left out.
For omission of letters: In a phrase such as “Rock ’n’ Roll”, there should be an apostro-phe before and after the n, because the ‘a’ and the d are both left out. And don’t turn the first apostrophe around—just because it appears in front of the letter does not mean you need to use the opposite single quote. An apostrophe is still the appropriate mark (not ‘n’).
In a phrase such as House o’ Fashion, the apostrophe takes the place of the f. There is not earthly reason for an apostrophe to be set before the o.
In a phrase such as Gone Fishin’ the same pattern is followed—the g is missing.
In a date when part of the year is left out, an apostrophe is needed to indicate the missing year. In the 80s would mean the temperature; but In the ’80s would mean the decade. Notice there is no apostrophe before the s! Why would there be? It is not possessive, nor is it a contraction—it is simply plural.
+71
This is where the real
punctuation is hidden.
QUOTES, DASHES, APOSTROPHES
72+
quotes, dashes, apostrophes
An en dash is half of the em rule (the width of a capital N) and is used between words that indicate a duration, (time or months or years). Use it where you might otherwise use the word “to.”
In a page layout application, the en dash can be used with a thin space on either side of it. If you want you can kern it so it is not a full space.
October – December6:30 – 8:45 A.M.4 – 6 years of age
The em dash is twice as long as the en dash—it’s about the size of a capital letter M in whatever size and typeface you’re using at the moment. This dash is often used in place of a colon or parentheses, or it might indicate an abrupt change in thought, or it’s used in a spot where a pe-riod is too strong and a comma is too weak.
Our equivalent on the typewriter was the double hyphen, but now we have a real em dash. Using two hyphens where there should be an em dash makes your look very unprofessional. When using an—no space is used on either side.
en dash
hyphen
em dash
A hyphen is one third of the em rule and is used to link words. It serves as a com-pound modifier where two words become one, such as x-height. A hyphen is also used to break works at syllables in text blocks.
+73
specialcharacters
“”‘’
–—≠
•fifl
©™®° ¢€⁄¡¿£çÇ
option + [ opening double quote
option + shift + [ closing double quote
option + ] opening single quote
option + shift + ] closing single quote
option + - en dash
option + shift + - em dash
option + ; ellipsis
option + 8 bullet
option + shift + 5 ligature of f and i
option + shift + 6 ligature of f and l
option + g copyright symbol
option + 2 trademark symbol
option + r
option + shift + 8 degree symbol
option + $ cent symbol
option + shift + 2 euro symbol option + shift + 1 fraction bar option + 1 option + shift + ?
option + 3
option + c
option + shift + c
76+
SPECIAL CHARACTERSRemember, to set an accent mark over a letter, press the Option key and the letter, then press the letter you want under it.
´`¨˜ˆ
option + e
option + ~
option + u
option + n
option + i
specialcharacters
The following is a list of the most often-used special characters and accent marks. On the following pages are key combi-nations for just about every accent you might need.
+77
bullets
This very useful typo-
graphic element can add
emphasis, clarity, and vi-
sual interest to all kinds
of copy.
BULLETS
80+
bullets
Simply put, a bullet is a large dot used to draw attention to each item in a list or series. The items can be single words, phrases, sentences or paragraphs. Even if you use the bullet that is part of your font, don’t automatically assume it’s the right size: it might need to be altered in scale or position to make it look balanced next to the text.
Bullets should be centered on either the cap height or x-height, depending on the nature of your copy. If all of your items begin with a cap, center the bullet on the cap, or a bit lower so it balances with the negative spaces created by the lowercase. If your items all begin with lowercase char-acters, center the bullets on the x-height. Insert some spacing after the bullet to avoid crowding.
The preferred way to align bullets is with the left margin. You can also have the bul-lets overhang the margin, and keep all your text aligned with the left margin. Which-ever style you choose, your listing will look best if items that run more than one line are indented so that the copy aligns with itself, and not with the bullet on the first line.
+81
To be more creative, substitute symbols or dingbats for the actual bullets. Try squares, triangles or check marks (just not all at once, as shown in the illustration!). Keep these simple and in proportion with the rest of your text.
82
choose a dingbat instead of the dumb ‘ol bullet
• lovely• surly• ghastly• womanly • saintly• ungodly • stately• sprightly
pick any three adjectives that describe yourself:
you have lots of dingbats to choose from, but they are usually too big
+ lovelys surly_ ghastly 4 womanlyp saintlyl ungodly F stately v sprightly
pick any three adjectives that describe yourself:
you can decrease the point size of the bullet, but then it sits too low
s lovelys surlys ghastly s womanly s saintlys ungodly s statelys sprightly
pick any three adjectives that describe yourself:
raise the dingbat higher off the baseline
lovely surly ghastly womanly saintly ungodly stately sprightly
pick any three adjectives that describe yourself:
s
s
s
s
s
s
s
s
82+
bullets
Another occasion to take advantageof the baseline shift feature is when using dingbats or ornaments. Suppose you have a list of items and you really want to use a fancy dingbat from the Zapf Dingbats font, instead of using the boring ol’ round bullet, but the Zapf Dingbat character is too big. If you reduce its size, the dingbat is too low because the character is still sitting on the baseline. So select the character and shift it up above the baseline.
+83
numerals& figures
Oldstyle figures are a
style of numeral which
approximate lowercase
letterforms by having an
x-height and varying as-
cenders and descenders.
NUMERALS & FIGURES
86+
numerals& figures
Oldstyle figures are a style of numeral which approximate lowercase letterforms by having an x-height and varying ascend-ers and descenders. They are considerably different from the more common “lining” (or “aligning”) figures which are all-cap height and typically monospaced in text faces so that they line up vertically on charts. Oldstyle figures have more of a tra-ditional, classic look. They are only avail-able for certain typefaces, sometimes as the regular numerals in a font, but more often within a supplementary or expert font. The figures are proportionately spaced, eliminating the white spaces that result from monospaced lining figures, especially around the numeral one.
Oldstyle figures are very useful and quite beautiful when set within text. Unlike lin-ing figures, they blend in without disturb-ing the color of the body copy. They also work well in headlines since they’re not as intrusive as lining figures. In fact, many people prefer them overall for most uses except charts and tables. It’s well worth the extra effort to track down and obtain typefaces with oldstyle numerals; the fonts that contain them might well become some of your favorites.
Notice how large and chunky these numbers appear:Dear John, please call me at 438-9762 at 3:00 to discuss marriage. Or write to me at Route 916, zip code 87505
Notice how beautifully these numbers blend into the text:Dear John, please call me at 438-9762 at 3:00 to discuss marriage. Or write to me at Route 916, zip code 87505
+87
small caps
Small caps are less intru-
sive when all uppercase
appears within normal
text or can be used for
special emphasis.
SMALL CAPS
91+
small caps
Small caps are uppercase (capital) letters that are about the size of normal lowercase letters in any given typeface. Small caps are less intrusive when all uppercase ap-pears within normal text or can be used for special emphasis. Computer programs can generate small caps for a any typeface, but those are not the same as true small caps. True small caps have line weights that are proportionally correct for the type-face, which me and that they can be used within a body of copy without looking noticeably wrong.
+ Set acronyms such as NASA or NASDAQ in small caps when they appear in body text or headlines.+ Avoid simply resizing capital letters or using the small caps feature in some pro-grams. Instead use typefaces that have been specifically created as small caps.+ Use small caps for common abbrevia-tions. Set common abbreviations such as AM or PM in small caps so they don’t overpower the accompanying text. Use small caps for A.M. and P.M.; space once after the number, and use periods. (if the font does not have small caps reduce the font size slightly)
+90
9/12
MRS EAVESused for small caps
The weight of the computer-drawn small caps is thinner than the weight of the regular initial (first letter) caps. Typeface is Mrs. Eaves.
There are quite a few font families that include “true-drawn” small caps—let-terforms that have been redesigned to match the proportions and thickness of the uppercase. These families are often called “expert” sets or perhaps “small cap” sets. The result is a smooth, uni-form, undisturbing tone throughout the text.
True-drawn small caps are specially drawn to match the weight of the capital letters in the same face.
There Is No Rest For The WickedThe Wicked Are Very Weary
92+
small caps
If you set acronyms in regular all caps, their visual presence is unnecessarily overwhelming. One standard and prac-tical place to use small caps is in acro-nyms such as FBI, NRC, or CBS.
Traditionally, ‘A.M.’ and ‘P.M.’ are set with small caps. If you were taught to type on a typewriter (or if you were taught on a keyboard by someone who was taught on a typewriter), you prob-ably learned to set these abbreviations in all caps because there were no small caps on typewriters. But now that you have the capability, you can and should set them properly.
The capital letters in the middle of the sentence call too much attention to themselves. Notice how the small caps blend in with the text. The capital letters for ‘P.M.’ are much too large— the abbre-viation is not that important.
Harriet, an FBI agent, turned on CNN to get the dirt on the CIA before going to bed at 9:30 P.M.
Harriet, an fbi agent, turned on cnn to get the dirt on the cia before going to bed at 9:30 p.m.
+93
paragraphbreaks
Paragraph breaks set a
rhythm for the reader. The
breaks have a relationship
with the column of text as
well as the page margins.
PARAGRAPH BREAKS
98+
A break may be introduced as an indenta-tion, as a space or both. The overall page feel will be influenced by your choice.
In typography there are 4 rules regarding paragraph breaks:+ the first line at the beginning of an article should be flush left (do not indent first paragraph)+ block paragraphs are flush left and are separated by extra leading not a full return+ the amount indent is = to the leading (sometimes needs a bit more)+ never hit two returns between paragraphs
paragraphbreaks
+97
MELIOR
8.5/12
Futurism was first announced on Febru-ary 20, 1909, when the Paris newspaper Le Figaro published a manifesto by the Italian poet and editor Filippo Tommaso Marinetti. The name Futurism, coined by Marinetti, reflected his emphasis on discarding what he conceived to be the static and irrelevant art of the past and celebrating change, originality, and innovation in culture and society. 1 Futur-ism rejected traditions and glorified contemporary life, mainly by emphasizing two dominant themes, the machine and motion. He exalted vio-lence and conflict and called for the sweeping repudiation of traditional cultural, social, and political values and the destruction of such cultural institutions as museums and libraries. The manifesto’s rhetoric was passionately bombastic; its tone was aggres-sive and inflammatory and was purposely intended to inspire public anger and amazement, to arouse controversy, and to at-tract widespread attention.
But is is the movements which survive, oddly, here where we live and work as poets and artists: or, if
98+
not the movements, then their sense of art as an life itself. All of which, as futurism, had come sharply into focus by the start of the world war: a first radical mix of art and life, the epitome in the poplar mind of an avant-garde. It was, on both its Russian & Italian sides, the first great “art” movement led by poets; and if its means now sometimes seem exaggerated or unripe in retrospect, they carry within them the seed of all that we were later to become.
While Marinetti’s opening manifesto for Italian Futurism bristled with a polemical stance in favor of the trans-formed present (1909), the later mainfestos of Futurist poets & artists offered formal/”technical” approaches to the works then getting under way. The key term--still resonant today--was parole in liberta 2 , by which poetry was to become “an uninterrupted sequence of new images… (a) strict bet of images or analogies, to be cast into the mysterious sea of phenomena.” This freedom-of-the-world, while it resembled other forms of collage and of image juxtaposition, more fully explored the use of innovative and expressive typography in the visual presentation of language, as set in motion by forerunners like Mallarme. Wrote Marinetti selbst 3 (circa 1915): Everything of any value is theatrical.”
paragraphbreaks
Futurism was first announced on February 20, 1909, when the Paris newspaper Le Figaro published a manifesto by the Italian poet and editor Filippo Tommaso Marinetti. The name Futurism, coined by Marinetti, reflected his emphasis on discarding what he conceived to be the static and irrelevant art of the past and celebrating change, originality, and innovation in culture and society.1 Fu-turism rejected traditions and glorified contemporary life, mainly by emphasiz-ing two dominant themes, the machine and motion. The works were character-ized by the depiction of several suc-cessive actions of a subject at the same time. Marinetti’s manifesto glorified the new technology of the automobile and the beauty of its speed, power, and movement. He exalted violence and conflict and called for the sweeping re-pudiation of traditional cultural, social, and political values and the destruc-tion of such cultural institutions as museums and libraries. The manifesto’s rhetoric was passionately bombastic; its tone was aggressive and inflammatory and was purposely intended to inspire public anger and amazement, to arouse controversy, and to attract widespread attention.
But is is the movements which survive, oddly, here where we live and work as poets and artists: or, if not the movements, then their sense of art as an life itself. All of which, as futurism, had come sharply into focus by the start of the world war: a first radical mix of art and life, the epitome in the poplar mind of an avant-garde. It was, on both its Russian
MELIOR
8.5/12 +99
& Italian sides, the first great “art” movement led by poets; and if its means now sometimes seem exaggerated or unripe in retrospect, they carry within them the seed of all that we were later to become.
While Marinetti’s opening mani-festo for Italian Futurism bristled with a polemical stance in favor of the transformed present (1909), the later mainfestos of Futurist poets & artists offered formal/”technical” approaches to the works then getting under way. The key term--still reso-nant today--was parole in liberta 2 , by which poetry was to become “an uninterrupted sequence of new images… (a) strict bet of images or analogies, to be cast into the mysterious sea of phenomena.” This freedom-of-the-world, while it resembled other forms of collage and of image juxtaposition, more fully explored the use of innovative and expressive typography in the visual presentation of language, as set in motion by forerun-ners like Mallarme. But the verbal liberation didn’t end with the page; it moved, rather, toward a new performance art and a poetry that “scurried off the page in all directions at once,” as Emmett Williams phrased it for the “language happenings” of a later decade. Outrageous and aggressive, the Futurists’ performances mixed declamation and gesture, events and sur-roundings, indifference and engagement, to break the barriers between themselves and those who came to jeer or cheer them. Wrote Marinetti selbst 3 (circa 1915): Everything of any value is theatrical.”
DIN
MELIOR
8.5/10
Futurism was first announced on Febru-ary 20, 1909, when the Paris new paper Le Figar published a mani-festo by the Italian poet and editor Filippo Tommaso Marinetti. The na Futurism, coined by Marinetti, re-flected his emphasis on discarding what he conceived to be the static and irrelevant art of the past and celebrating change, originality, and innovation in culture and society.1 Futurism rejected traditions and glorified contemporary life, mainly by emphasizing two dominant themes, the machine and motion. The works were characterized by the depiction of several successive actions of a subject at the same time. Marinetti’s manifesto glorified the new technology of the automo-bile and the beauty of its speed, power, and movement. He exalted violence and conflict and called for the sweeping repudiation of tradi-tional cultural, social, and political values and the destruction of such cultural institutions as museums and libraries. The manifesto’s rheto-ric was passionately bombastic; its tone was aggressive and inflamma-tory and was purposely intended to inspire public anger and amaze-ment, to arouse controversy, and to attract widespread attention.
But is is the movements which survive, oddly, here where we live an work as poets and artists: or, if not the movements, then their sense of
100+
art as an life itself. All of which, as futurism, had come sharply into focus by the start of the world war: a first radical mix of art and life, the epitome in the poplar mind of an avant-garde. It was, on both its Russian & Italian sides, the first great “art” movement led by poets; and if its means now sometimes seem exaggerated or unripe in retrospect, they carry within them the seed of all that we were later to become.
While Marinetti’s opening manifesto for Italian Futurism bris-tled with a polemical stance in favor of the transformed present (1909), the later mainfestos of Futurist poets & artists offered formal/”technical” approaches to the works then getting under way. The key term--still resonant today--was parole in liberta 2 , by which poetry was to become “an uninterrupted sequence of new images… (a) strict bet of images or analogies, to be cast into the mysterious sea of phenomena.” This freedom-of-the-world, while it re-sembled other forms of collage and of image juxtaposition, more fully explored the use of innovative and expressive typography in the visual presentation of language, as set in motion by forerunners like Mallarme. But the verbal liberation didn’t end with the page; it moved, rather, toward a new performance art and a poetry that “scurried off the page in all directions at once,” as Emmett Williams phrased it for the “language happenings” of a later decade. Outrageous and aggressive, the Futurists’ performances mixed declamation and gesture, events and surround-ings, indifference and engagement, to break the barriers between themselves and those who came to jeer or cheer them. Wrote Marinetti selbst 3 (circa 1915): Everything of any value is theatrical.”
paragraphbreaks
Futurism was first an-nounced on February 20, 1909, when the Paris new paper Le Figara published a manifesto by the Italian poet and editor Filippo Tommaso Marinetti. The na Futurism, coined by Marinetti, reflect-ed his emphasis on discard-ing what he conceived to be the static and irrelevant art of the past and celebrat-ing change, originality, and innovation in culture and society. Futurism rejected traditions and glorified contemporary life, mainly by emphasizing two dominant themes, the machine and motion. The works were characterized by the depiction of several successive actions of a subject at the same time. Marinetti’s manifesto glo-rified the new technology of the automo-bile and the beauty of its speed, power, and movement. He exalted violence and conflict and called for the sweeping repudiation of traditional cultural, social, and political values and the destruction of such cultural institutions as museums and libraries. The manifesto’s rhetoric was passionately bombastic; its tone was aggressive and inflammatory and was purposely intended to inspire public an-ger and amazement, to arouse contrversy, and to attract widespread attention.
MELIOR
8.5/10
+101
But is is the movements which survive, oddly, here where we live an work as poets and artists: or, if not the movements, then their sense of art as an life itself. All of which, as futurism, had come sharply into focus by the start of the world war: a first radical mix of art and life, the epitome in the poplar mind of an avant-garde. It was, on both its Russian & Italian sides, the first great “art” movement led by poets; and if its means now sometimes seem exaggerated or unripe in retrospect, they carry within
them the seed of all that we were later to become.
While Marinetti’s opening manifesto for Italian Futurism bristled with a polemical stance in favor of the transformed present (1909), the later mainfestos of Futurist poets & artists offered formal/”technical” approaches to the works then getting under way. The key term--still resonant today--was parole in liberta 2 , by which poetry was to become “an uninterrupted sequence of new images… (a) strict bet of images or analogies, to be cast into the mysterious sea of phenomena.” This freedom-of-the-world, while it resembled other forms of collage and of image juxtapo-sition, more fully explored the use of innovative and expressive typography in the visual presentation of language, as set in motion by forerunners like Mallarme. But the verbal liberation didn’t end with the page; it moved, rather, toward a new performance art and a poetry that “scurried off the page in all directions at once,” as Emmett Williams phrased it for the “language happenings” of a later decade. Outrageous and aggressive, the Futurists’ performances mixed declamation and gesture, events and surroundings, indif-ference and engagement, to break the barriers between themselves and those who came to jeer or cheer them. Wrote Marinetti selbst 3 (circa 1915): Everything of any value is theatrical.”
DIN
16/18MELIOR
8.5/12
Futurism was first announced on Febru-ary 20, 1909, when the Paris new paper Le Figar published a manifesto by the Italian poet and edi-tor Filippo Tommaso Marinetti. The na Futurism, coined by Marinetti, reflected his emphasis on discarding what he con-ceived to be the static and irrelevant art of the past and celebrating change, origi-nality, and innovation in culture and society.1 Futurism rejected traditions and glorified contemporary life, mainly by emphasizing two dominant themes, the machine and motion. The works were characterized by the depiction of several successive actions of a subject at the same time. Marinetti’s manifesto glorified the new technology of the automobile and the beauty of its speed, power, and movement. He exalted violence and conflict and called for the sweeping repudiation of traditional cul-tural, social, and political values and the destruction of such cultural institutions as museums and libraries. The manifes-to’s rhetoric was passionately bombastic; its tone was aggressive and inflammatory and was purposely intended to inspire public anger and amazement, to arouse controversy, and to attract widespread
attention.
But it is the move-ments which survive, oddly, here where we live an work as poets and artists: or, if not the movements, then their sense of art as an life itself. All of which, as futurism, had come sharply into
102+
focus by the start of the world war: a first radical mix of art and life, the epitome in the poplar mind of an avant-garde. It was, on both its Russian & Italian sides, the first great “art” movement led by poets; and if its means now sometimes seem exaggerated or unripe in retrospect, they carry within them the seed of all that we were later to become.
While Marinetti’s opening mani-festo for Italian Futurism bristled with a polemical stance in favor of the transformed present (1909), the later mainfestos of Futurist poets & artists offered formal/”technical” approaches to the works then getting under way. The key term--still resonant today--was parole in liberta 2 , by which poetry was to become “an uninterrupted sequence of new images… (a) strict bet of images or analogies, to be cast into the mysterious sea of phenom-ena.” This freedom-of-the-world, while it resembled other forms of collage and of image juxtaposition, more fully explored the use of innovative and expressive typography in the visual presentation of language, as set in motion by forerunners like Mallarme. But the verbal liberation didn’t end with the page; it moved, rather, toward a new performance art and a poetry that “scurried off the page in all directions at once,” as Emmett Williams phrased it for the “language happenings” of a later decade. Outrageous and aggressive, the Futurists’ performances mixed declamation and gesture, events and surroundings, indifference and engagement, to break the barriers between themselves and those who came to jeer or cheer them. Wrote Marinetti selbst 3 (circa 1915): Everything of any value is theatrical.”
paragraphbreaks
Futurism was first announced on Febru-
ary 20, 1909, when the Paris newspaper
Le Figaro published a manifesto by the
Italian poet and editor Filippo Tommaso
Marinetti. The name ‘Futurism’, coined
by Marinetti, reflected his emphasis on
discarding what he conceived to be the
static and irrelevant art of the past, and
celebrating change, originality, and in-
novation in culture and society. Futur-
ism rejected traditions and glorified con-
temporary life, mainly by emphasizing
two dominant themes: the machine and
motion. The works were characterized
by the depic- tion of several successive
actions of a subject at the same time.
Marinetti’s manifesto glorified the new
technology of the automobile and the
beauty of its speed, power, and move-
ment. He exalted violence and conflict
and called for the sweeping repudia-
tion of traditional cultural, social, and
political values, and the destruction of
such cultural institutions as museums
and libraries. The manifesto’s rhetoric
was passionately bombastic; its tone
was aggressive and inflammatory and
was purposely intended to inspire
public anger and amazement, to arouse
controversy, and to attract widespread
attention. // But it is the
movements which survive, oddly, here
MELIOR
8.5/1614/16
+103
where we live and work as poets and artists; if not the move-
ments, then their sense of art as an life itself survives. All of
which, as Futurism, had come sharply into focus by the start
of the world war: a first radical mix of art and life, the epitome
in the poplar mind of an avant-garde. It was, on both its Rus-
sian & Italian sides, the first great “art” movement led by poets;
and if its means now sometimes seem exaggerated or unripe
in retrospect, they carry the seed of all that we were later
to become. // While Marinetti’s opening mani-
festo for Italian Futurism bristled with a polemical stance in
favor of the transformed present (1909), the later manifestos of
Futurist poets & artists offered formal “technical” approaches
to the works then getting under way. The key term—still reso-
nant today—was parole in liberta 2 , by which poetry was to
become “an uninterrupted sequence of new images... (a) strict
bet of images or analogies, to be cast into the mysterious sea of
phenomena.” This “freedom of the world”, while it resembled
other forms of collage and of image juxtaposition, more fully
explored the use of innovative and expressive typography
in the visual presentation of language, as set in motion by
forerunners like Mallarme. But the verbal liberation didn’t end
with the page; it moved, rather, toward a new performance
art and a poetry that “scurried off the page in all directions at
once,” as Emmett Williams phrased it for the “language hap-
penings” of a later decade. Outrageous and aggressive, the Fu-
tur- ists’ performances mixed declamation and gesture, events
and surroundings, indifference and engagement, to break the
barriers between themselves and those who came to jeer or
cheer them. Wrote Marinetti Selbst 3 (circa 1915): “Everything
of any value is theatrical.”
MELIOR
9/14Futurism ws first announced on Feb-
ruary 20, 1909, when the Paris news-
paper Le Figaro published a manifesto
by the Italian poet and editor Filippo
Tommaso Marinetti. The name ‘Futur-
ism’, coined by Marinetti, reflected
his emphasis on discarding what he
conceived to be the static and irrel-
evant art of the past, and celebrating
change, originality, and innovation in
culture and society. Futurism rejected
traditions and glorified contempo-
rary life, mainly by emphasizing two
dominant themes: the machine and
motion. The works were characterized
by the depiction of several successive
actions of a subject at the same time.
Marinetti’s manifesto glorified the new
technology of the automobile and the
beauty of its speed, power, and move-
ment. He exalted violence and conflict
and called for the sweeping repudia-
tion of traditional cultural, social, and
political values, and the destruction of
such cultural institutions as muse-
ums and libraries. The manifesto’s
rhetoric was passionately bombastic;
its tone was aggressive and inflamma-
tory and was purposely intended to
inspire public anger and amazement,
to arouse controversy, and to attract
104+
widespread attention. >> But it is the movements which
survive, oddly, here where we live and work as poets and
artists; if not the movements, then their sense of art as an
life itself survives. All of which, as Futurism, had come
sharply into focus by the start of the world war: a first radi-
cal mix of art and life, the epitome in the poplar mind of
an avant-garde. It was, on both its Russian & Italian sides,
the first great “art” movement led by poets; and if its means
now sometimes seem exaggerated or unripe in retrospect,
they carry within them the seed of all that we were later
to become. >> While Marinetti’s opening manifesto for
Italian Futurism bristled with a polemical stance in favor
of the transformed present (1909), the later manifestos of
Futurist poets & artists offered formal “technical” ap- pro-
aches to the works then getting under way. The key term—
still resonant today—was parole in liberta 2 , by which
poetry was to become “an uninterrupted sequence of new
images... (a) strict bet of images or analogies, to be cast into
the mysterious sea of phenomena.” This “freedom of the
world”, while it re- sembled other forms of collage and of
image juxtaposition, more fully explored the use of innova-
tive and expressive typography in the visual presentation
of language, as set in motion by forerunners like Mal-
larme. But the verbal liberation didn’t end with the page; it
moved, rather, toward a new performance art and a poetry
that “scurried off the page in all directions at once,” as
Emmett Williams phrased it for the “language happenings”
of a later decade. Outrageous and aggressive, the Futurists’
performances mixed declamation and gesture, events and
surroundings, indifference and engagement, to break the
barriers between themselves and those who came to jeer or
cheer them. Wrote Marinetti Selbst 3 (circa 1915): “Every-
thing of any value is theatrical.”
paragraphbreaks
FUTURISM was first announced
on February 20, 1909, when the Paris
newspaper Le Figaro published a
manifesto by the Italian poet and editor
Filippo Tommaso Marinetti. The name
‘Futurism’, coined by Marinetti, reflected
his emphasis on discarding what he
conceived to be the static and irrelevant
art of the past, and celebrating change,
originality, and innovation in culture and
society. Futurism rejected traditions and
glorified contemporary life, mainly by
emphasizing two dominant themes: the
machine and motion. The works were
characterized by the depic- tion of several
successive actions of a subject at the
same time. Marinetti’s manifesto glorified
the new technology of the automobile
and the beauty of its speed, power, and
movement. He exalted violence and
conflict and called for the sweeping
repudiation of traditional cultural, social,
and political values, and the destruction
of such cultural institutions as museums
and libraries. The manifesto’s rhetoric
was passionately bombastic; its tone was
aggressive and inflammatory and was
purposely intended to inspire public an-
ger and amazement, to arouse controver-
sy, and to attract widespread attention.
BUT it is the movements which sur-
DIN
13/16MELIOR
8.5/16
+105
vive, oddly, here where we live and work as poets and artists;
if not the move- ments, then their sense of art as an life itself
survives. All of which, as Futurism, had come sharply into
focus by the start of the world war: a first radical mix of art and
life, the epitome in the poplar mind of an avant-garde. It was, on
both its Russian & Italian sides, the first great “art” movement
led by poets; and if its means now sometimes seem exaggerated
or unripe in retrospect, they carry within them the seed of all
that we were later to become.
WHILE Marinetti’s opening manifesto for Italian Futurism
bristled with a polemical stance in favor of the trans- formed
present (1909), the later manifestos of Futurist poets & artists
offered formal “technical” approaches to the works then getting
under way. The key term—still resonant today—was parole in
liberta 2 , by which poetry was to become “an uninterrupted
sequence of new images... (a) strict bet of images or analogies, to
be cast into the mysterious sea of phenomena.” This “freedom
of the world”, while it resembled other forms of collage and
of image juxtaposition, more fully explored the use of innova-
tive and expressive typography in the visual presentation of
language, as set in motion by forerunners like Mallarme. But the
verbal liberation didn’t end with the page; it moved, rather, to-
ward a new performance art and a poetry that “scurried off the
page in all directions at once,” as Emmett Williams phrased it
for the “language happenings” of a later decade. Outrageous and
aggressive, the Futur- ists’ performances mixed declamation and
gesture, events and surroundings, indifference and engagement,
to break the barriers between themselves and those who came
to jeer or cheer them. Wrote Marinetti Selbst 3 (circa 1915):
“Everything of any value is theatrical.”
Futurism was first announced on Feb-
ruary 20, 1909, when the Paris news-
paper Le Figaro published a manifesto
by the Italian poet and editor Filippo
Tommaso Marinetti. The name ‘Futur-
ism’, coined by Marinetti, reflected
his emphasis on discarding what he
conceived to be the static and irrel-
evant art of the past, and celebrating
change, originality, and innovation in
culture and society. Futurism rejected
traditions and glorified contemporary
life, mainly by emphasizing two domi-
nant themes: the machine and motion.
The works were characterized by
the depic- tion of several successive
actions of a subject at the same time.
Marinetti’s manifesto glorified the new
technology of the automobile and the
beauty of its speed, power, and move-
ment. He exalted violence and conflict
and called for the sweeping repudia-
tion of traditional cultural, social, and
political values, and the destruction of
such cultural institutions as muse-
ums and libraries. The manifesto’s
rhetoric was passionately bombastic;
its tone was aggressive and inflamma-
tory and was purposely intended to
inspire public anger and amazement,
to arouse controversy, and to attract
MELIOR
9/14
106+
widespread attention.
But it is the movements which survive, oddly, here where
we live and work as poets and artists; if not the move-
ments, then their sense of art as an life itself survives. All
of which, as Futurism, had come sharply into focus by the
start of the world war: a first radical mix of art and life, the
epitome in the poplar mind of an avant-garde. It was, on
both its Russian & Italian sides, the first great “art” move-
ment led by poets; and if its means now sometimes seem
exaggerated or unripe in retrospect, they carry within them
the seed of all that we were later to become.
While Marinetti’s opening manifesto for Italian Futurism
bristled with a polemical stance in favor
of the transformed present (1909), the later manifestos of
Futurist poets & artists offered formal “technical” ap-
proaches to the works then getting under way. The key
term—still resonant today—was parole in liberta 2 , by
which poetry was to be- come “an uninterrupted sequence
of new images... (a) strict bet of images or analogies, to be
cast into the mysteri- ous sea of phenomena.” This “free-
dom of the world”, while it resembled other forms of col-
lage and of image juxta- position, more fully explored the
use of innovative and expressive typography in the visual
presentation of language, as set in motion by forerunners
like Mallarme. But the verbal liberation didn’t end with the
page; it moved, rather, toward a new performance art and a
poetry that “scurried off the page in all directions at once,”
as Emmett Williams phrased it for the “language happen-
ings” of a later decade. Outrageous and aggressive, the
Futurists’ performances mixed declamation and gesture,
events and surroundings, indifference and engagement,
to break the barriers be- tween themselves and those who
came to jeer or cheer them. Wrote Marinetti Selbst 3 (circa
1915): “Everything of any value is theatrical.”
FUTURISM WAS FIRST AN-NOUNCED ON FEBRUARY 20, 1909, when the Paris newspaper
Le Figaro published a manifesto by the
Italian poet and editor Filippo Tommaso
Marinetti. The name ‘Futurism’, coined
by Marinetti, reflected his emphasis on
discarding what he conceived to be the
static and irrelevant art of the past, and
celebrating change, originality, and in-
novation in culture and society. Futurism
rejected traditions and glorified con-
temporary life, mainly by emphasizing
two dominant themes: the machine and
motion. The works were characterized
by the depiction of several successive
actions of a subject at the same time.
Marinetti’s manifesto glorified the new
technology of the automobile and the
beauty of its speed, power, and move-
ment. He exalted vio- lence and conflict
and called for the sweeping repudiation
of traditional cultural, social, and politi-
cal values, and the destruction of such
cultural institutions as museums and
libraries. The manifesto’s rhetoric was
passionately bombas- tic; its tone was ag-
gressive and inflammatory and was pur-
posely intended to inspire public anger
and amazement, to arouse controversy,
and to attract widespread attention.
DIN
13/16MELIOR
8.5/16
+107
BUT IT IS THE MOVEMENTS WHICH SUR-VIVE, ODDLY, HERE WHERE
we live and work as poets and artists; if not the move-
ments, then their sense of art as an life itself survives. All of
which, as Futurism, had come sharply into focus by the start of
the world war: a first radical mix of art and life, the epitome in
the poplar mind of an avant-garde. It was, on both its Russian &
Italian sides, the first great “art” movement led by poets; and if
its means now sometimes seem exaggerated or unripe in retro-
spect, they carry within them the seed of all that we were later
to become.
WHILE MARINETTI’S OPENING MANIFES-TO FOR ITALIAN FUTURISM bristled with a polemical stance in favor of the trans-
formed present (1909), the later manifestos of Futurist poets
& artists offered formal “technical” approaches to the works
then getting under way. The key term—still resonant today—
was parole in liberta 2 , by which poetry was to become “an
uninterrupted sequence of new images... (a) strict bet of images
or analogies, to be cast into the mysterious sea of phenomena.”
This “freedom of the world”, while it resembled other forms of
collage and of image juxtaposition, more fully explored the use
of innovative and expressive typography in the visual presenta-
tion of language, as set in motion by forerunners like Mallarme.
But the verbal liberation didn’t end with the page; it moved,
rather, toward a new performance art and a poetry that “scur-
ried off the page in all directions at once,” as Emmett Williams
phrased it for the “language happenings” of a later decade.
Outrageous and aggressive, the Futurists’ performances mixed
declamation and gesture, events and surroundings, indifference
and engagement, to break the barriers between themselves and
those who came to jeer or cheer them. Wrote Marinetti Selbst 3
(circa 1915): “Everything of any value is theatrical.”
headerssubheads
crossheads
header: that material
which is separated form
the main body of text and
appears at the top of
a printed page.
subhead: a phrase,
sentence, or several sen-
tences near the title of
the article or story.
HEADERS, SUBHEADS, CROSSHEADS
110+
The main header or “headline” is essential to be bold and leap out as the main title of the page or chapter start. If it does not, the reader may be confused as to where the document actually starts. So I always think its a good rule to ensure the reader knows where a section starts and make it quite plain. The main header should also look like it belongs to the first sentence. This can be achieved by ensuring that its paragraph spacing (the space after a hard return) is smaller than the paragraph spac-ing of the first sentence. Paragraph spac-ing is not commonly used - even amongst designers, but it is an extremely useful tool. Many people add spacing by hitting return but this does not give much control and cannot be styled from style sheets.
Introduction paragraphs are a useful way to entice the reader to continue on read-ing. They also help not to waste a readers time if they are not interested in reading further. Typographically speaking these into paragraphs need to be easy to read but more distant than the body text
headerssubheads
crossheads
below. They are not the main article and need to be distinguished from it.
The purpose of a subheader is to split up body text so that a reader can find their way around the document with ease. it also makes the document more readable because the viewer is not faced with a page of block text. Each subheader needs to be linked with the corresponding body text underneath it. This should be achieved by using correct spacing after and before the subheader (You find these settings in most “Paragraph” tool pallets and the example below demonstrates how it looks when executed)
+111
WO
RD
S IN
LIB
ERTY
radical mix of art and life
a prologue to futurism
112+
FUTURISM was first announced
on February 20, 1909, when the Paris
newspaper Le Figaro published a
manifesto by the Italian poet and editor
Filippo Tommaso Marinetti. The name
‘Futurism’, coined by Marinetti, reflected
his emphasis on discarding what he
conceived to be the static and irrelevant
art of the past, and celebrating change,
originality, and innovation in culture and
society. Futurism rejected traditions and
glorified contemporary life, mainly by
emphasizing two dominant themes: the
machine and motion. The works were
characterized by the depic- tion of several
successive actions of a subject at the
same time. Marinetti’s manifesto glorified
the new technology of the automobile
and the beauty of its speed, power, and
movement. He exalted violence and
conflict and called for the sweeping
repudiation of traditional cultural, social,
and political values, and the destruction
of such cultural institutions as museums
and libraries. The manifesto’s rhetoric
was passionately bombastic; its tone was
aggressive and inflammatory and was
purposely intended to inspire public an-
ger and amazement, to arouse controver-
sy, and to attract widespread attention.
BUT it is the movements which survive, oddly, here where we
live and work as poets and artists; if not the move- ments, then
their sense of art as an life itself survives. All of which, as Futur-
ism, had come sharply into focus by the start of the world war:
a first radical mix of art and life, the epitome in the poplar mind
of an avant-garde. It was, on both its Russian & Italian sides, the
first great “art” movement led by poets; and if its means now
sometimes seem exaggerated or unripe in retrospect, they carry
within them the seed of all that we were later to become.
WHILE Marinetti’s opening manifesto for Italian Futurism
bristled with a polemical stance in favor of the trans- formed
present (1909), the later manifestos of Futurist poets & artists
offered formal “technical” approaches to the works then getting
under way. The key term—still resonant today—was parole in
liberta 2 , by which poetry was to become “an uninterrupted
sequence of new images... (a) strict bet of images or analogies, to
be cast into the mysterious sea of phenomena.” This “freedom
of the world”, while it resembled other forms of collage and
of image juxtaposition, more fully explored the use of innova-
tive and expressive typography in the visual presentation of
language, as set in motion by forerunners like Mallarme. But the
verbal liberation didn’t end with the page; it moved, rather, to-
ward a new performance art and a poetry that “scurried off the
page in all directions at once,” as Emmett Williams phrased it
for the “language happenings” of a later decade. Outrageous and
aggressive, the Futur- ists’ performances mixed declamation and
gesture, events and surroundings, indifference and engagement,
to break the barriers between themselves and those who came
to jeer or cheer them. Wrote Marinetti Selbst 3 (circa 1915):
“Everything of any value is theatrical.”
headerssubheads
crossheads
WORDS IN
LIB
ERTY
+113
a prologue to futurism: Futur-
ism ws first announced on February
20, 1909, when the Paris newspaper
Le Figaro published a manifesto by
the Italian poet and editor Filippo
Tommaso Marinetti. The name ‘Futur-
ism’, coined by Marinetti, reflected
his emphasis on discarding what he
conceived to be the static and irrel-
evant art of the past, and celebrating
change, originality, and innovation in
culture and society. Futurism rejected
traditions and glorified contempo-
rary life, mainly by emphasizing two
dominant themes: the machine and
motion. The works were characterized
by the depiction of several successive
actions of a subject at the same time.
Marinetti’s manifesto glorified the new
technology of the automobile and the
beauty of its speed, power, and move-
ment. He exalted violence and conflict
and called for the sweeping repudia-
tion of traditional cultural, social, and
political values, and the destruction of
such cultural institutions as muse-
ums and libraries. The manifesto’s
rhetoric was passionately bombastic;
its tone was aggressive and inflamma-
tory and was purposely intended to
inspire public anger and amazement,
to arouse controversy, and to attract widespread attention.
>> But it is the movements which survive, oddly, here
where we live and work as poets and artists; if not the
movements, then their sense of art as an life itself survives.
All of which, as Futurism, had come sharply into focus
by the start of the world war: a first radical mix of art and
life, the epitome in the poplar mind of an avant-garde. It
was, on both its Russian & Italian sides, the first great “art”
movement led by poets; and if its means now sometimes
seem exaggerated or unripe in retrospect, they carry within
them the seed of all that we were later to become. >>
radical mix of art and life: While Marinetti’s opening
manifesto for Italian Futurism bristled with a polemical
stance in favor of the transformed present (1909), the later
manifestos of Futurist poets & artists offered formal “tech-
nical” ap- proaches to the works then getting under way.
The key term—still resonant today—was parole in liberta
2 , by which poetry was to become “an uninterrupted se-
quence of new images... (a) strict bet of images or analogies,
to be cast into the mysterious sea of phenomena.” This
“freedom of the world”, while it re- sembled other forms of
collage and of image juxtaposition, more fully explored the
use of innovative and expressive typography in the visual
presentation of language, as set in motion by forerunners
like Mal- larme. But the verbal liberation didn’t end with
the page; it moved, rather, toward a new performance art
and a poetry that “scurried off the page in all directions
at once,” as Emmett Williams phrased it for the “language
happenings” of a later decade. Outrageous and aggres-
sive, the Futurists’ performances mixed declamation and
gesture, events and surroundings, indifference and engage-
ment, to break the barriers between themselves and those
who came to jeer or cheer them. Wrote Marinetti Selbst 3
a prologue to futurism
radical mix of art and life
WORDS IN LIBERTY
114+
Futurism was first announced on Feb-
ruary 20, 1909, when the Paris news-
paper Le Figaro published a manifesto
by the Italian poet and editor Filippo
Tommaso Marinetti. The name ‘Futur-
ism’, coined by Marinetti, reflected his
emphasis on discarding what he con-
ceived to be the static and irrelevant
art of the past, and celebrating change,
originality, and innovation in culture
and society. Futurism rejected tradi-
tions and glorified contemporary life,
mainly by emphasizing two dominant
themes: the machine and motion. The
works were characterized by the depic-
tion of several successive actions of a
subject at the same time. Marinetti’s
manifesto glorified the new technology
of the automobile and the beauty of its
speed, power, and movement. He exalt-
ed violence and conflict and called for
the sweeping repudiation of traditional
cultural, social, and political values,
and the destruction of such cultural
institutions as museums and libraries.
The manifesto’s rhetoric was passion-
ately bombastic; its tone was aggressive
and inflammatory and was purposely
intended to inspire public anger and
amazement, to arouse controversy, and
to attract widespread attention.
But it is the movements which sur-
vive, oddly, here where we live and work as poets and
artists; if not the move- ments, then their sense of art as an
life itself survives. All of which, as Futurism, had come
sharply into focus by the start of the world war: a first radi-
cal mix of art and life, the epitome in the poplar mind of
an avant-garde. It was, on both its Russian & Italian sides,
the first great “art” movement led by poets; and if its means
now sometimes seem exaggerated or unripe in retrospect,
they carry within them the seed of all that we were later to
become.
While Marinetti’s opening manifesto for Italian Futurism
bristled with a polemical stance in favor
of the transformed present (1909), the later manifestos of
Futurist poets & artists offered formal “technical” ap-
proaches to the works then getting under way. The key
term—still resonant today—was parole in liberta 2 , by
which poetry was to be- come “an uninterrupted sequence
of new images... (a) strict bet of images or analogies, to be
cast into the mysteri- ous sea of phenomena.” This “free-
dom of the world”, while it resembled other forms of col-
lage and of image juxta- position, more fully explored the
use of innovative and expressive typography in the visual
presentation of language, as set in motion by forerunners
like Mallarme. But the verbal liberation didn’t end with the
page; it moved, rather, toward a new performance art and a
poetry that “scurried off the page in all directions at once,”
as Emmett Williams phrased it for the “language happen-
ings” of a later decade. Outrageous and aggressive, the
Futurists’ performances mixed declamation and gesture,
events and surroundings, indifference and engagement,
to break the barriers be- tween themselves and those who
came to jeer or cheer them. Wrote Marinetti Selbst 3 (circa
1915): “Everything of any value is theatrical.”
headerssubheads
crossheads
a pr
olog
ue
to fu
turi
sm
radical mix of art and life
+115
Futurism was first an-nounced on February 20, 1909, when the Paris new paper Le Figara published a manifesto by the Italian poet and editor Filippo Tommaso Marinetti. The na Futurism, coined by Marinetti, reflect-ed his emphasis on discard-ing what he conceived to be the static and irrelevant art of the past and celebrat-ing change, originality, and innovation in culture and society. Futurism rejected traditions and glorified contemporary life, mainly by emphasizing two dominant themes, the machine and motion. The works were characterized by the depiction of several successive actions of a subject at the same time. Marinetti’s manifesto glo-rified the new technology of the automo-bile and the beauty of its speed, power, and movement. He exalted violence and conflict and called for the sweeping repudiation of traditional cultural, social, and political values and the destruction of such cultural institutions as museums and libraries. The manifesto’s rhetoric was passionately bombastic; its tone was aggressive and inflammatory and was purposely intended to inspire public an-ger and amazement, to arouse contrversy, and to attract widespread attention.
But is is the movements which survive, oddly, here where we live an work as poets and artists: or, if not the movements, then their sense of art as an life itself. All of which, as futurism, had come sharply into focus by the start of the world war: a first radical mix of art and life, the epitome in the poplar mind of an avant-garde. It was, on both its Russian & Italian sides, the first great “art” movement led by poets; and if its means now sometimes seem exaggerated or unripe in retrospect, they carry within
them the seed of all that we were later to become.
While Marinetti’s opening manifesto for Italian Futurism bristled with a polemical stance in favor of the transformed present (1909), the later mainfestos of Futurist poets & artists offered formal/”technical” approaches to the works then getting under way. The key term--still resonant today--was parole in liberta 2 , by which poetry was to become “an uninterrupted sequence of new images… (a) strict bet of images or analogies, to be cast into the mysterious sea of phenomena.” This freedom-of-the-world, while it resembled other forms of collage and of image juxtapo-sition, more fully explored the use of innovative and expressive typography in the visual presentation of language, as set in motion by forerunners like Mallarme. But the verbal liberation didn’t end with the page; it moved, rather, toward a new performance art and a poetry that “scurried off the page in all directions at once,” as Emmett Williams phrased it for the “language happenings” of a later decade. Outrageous and aggressive, the Futurists’ performances mixed declamation and gesture, events and surroundings, indif-ference and engagement, to break the barriers between themselves and those who came to jeer or cheer them. Wrote Marinetti selbst 3 (circa 1915): Everything of any value is theatrical.”
WO
RD
S IN
LIBERTY116+
FUTURISM WAS FIRST AN-NOUNCED ON FEBRUARY 20, 1909, when the Paris newspaper
Le Figaro published a manifesto by the
Italian poet and editor Filippo Tommaso
Marinetti. The name ‘Futurism’, coined
by Marinetti, reflected his emphasis on
discarding what he conceived to be the
static and irrelevant art of the past, and
celebrating change, originality, and in-
novation in culture and society. Futurism
rejected traditions and glorified con-
temporary life, mainly by emphasizing
two dominant themes: the machine and
motion. The works were characterized
by the depiction of several successive
actions of a subject at the same time.
Marinetti’s manifesto glorified the new
technology of the automobile and the
beauty of its speed, power, and move-
ment. He exalted vio- lence and conflict
and called for the sweeping repudiation
of traditional cultural, social, and politi-
cal values, and the destruction of such
cultural institutions as museums and
libraries. The manifesto’s rhetoric was
passionately bombas- tic; its tone was ag-
gressive and inflammatory and was pur-
posely intended to inspire public anger
and amazement, to arouse controversy,
and to attract widespread attention.
BUT IT IS THE MOVEMENTS WHICH SUR-VIVE, ODDLY, HERE WHERE
we live and work as poets and artists; if not the move-
ments, then their sense of art as an life itself survives. All of
which, as Futurism, had come sharply into focus by the start of
the world war: a first radical mix of art and life, the epitome in
the poplar mind of an avant-garde. It was, on both its Russian &
Italian sides, the first great “art” movement led by poets; and if
its means now sometimes seem exaggerated or unripe in retro-
spect, they carry within them the seed of all that we were later
to become.
WHILE MARINETTI’S OPENING MANIFES-TO FOR ITALIAN FUTURISM bristled with a polemical stance in favor of the trans-
formed present (1909), the later manifestos of Futurist poets
& artists offered formal “technical” approaches to the works
then getting under way. The key term—still resonant today—
was parole in liberta 2 , by which poetry was to become “an
uninterrupted sequence of new images... (a) strict bet of images
or analogies, to be cast into the mysterious sea of phenomena.”
This “freedom of the world”, while it resembled other forms of
collage and of image juxtaposition, more fully explored the use
of innovative and expressive typography in the visual presenta-
tion of language, as set in motion by forerunners like Mallarme.
But the verbal liberation didn’t end with the page; it moved,
rather, toward a new performance art and a poetry that “scur-
ried off the page in all directions at once,” as Emmett Williams
phrased it for the “language happenings” of a later decade.
Outrageous and aggressive, the Futurists’ performances mixed
declamation and gesture, events and surroundings, indifference
and engagement, to break the barriers between themselves and
those who came to jeer or cheer them. Wrote Marinetti Selbst 3
(circa 1915): “Everything of any value is theatrical.”
headerssubheads
crossheads
a prologue to futurism
radical mix of art and life
WORDS
IN LIBERTY
+117
Futurism was first announced on February 20, 1909, when the Paris newspaper Le Figaro published a manifesto by the Italian poet and editor Filippo Tommaso Marinetti. The name Futurism, coined by Marinetti, reflected his emphasis on discarding what he conceived to be the static and irrelevant art of the past and celebrating change, originality, and innovation in culture and society.1 Fu-turism rejected traditions and glorified contemporary life, mainly by emphasiz-ing two dominant themes, the machine and motion. The works were character-ized by the depiction of several suc-cessive actions of a subject at the same time. Marinetti’s manifesto glorified the new technology of the automobile and the beauty of its speed, power, and movement. He exalted violence and conflict and called for the sweeping re-pudiation of traditional cultural, social, and political values and the destruc-tion of such cultural institutions as museums and libraries. The manifesto’s rhetoric was passionately bombastic; its tone was aggressive and inflammatory and was purposely intended to inspire public anger and amazement, to arouse controversy, and to attract widespread attention.
But is is the movements which survive, oddly, here where we live and work as poets and artists: or, if not the movements, then their sense of art as an life itself. All of which, as futurism, had come sharply into focus by the start of the world war: a first radical mix of art and life, the epitome in the poplar mind of an avant-garde. It was, on both its Russian
& Italian sides, the first great “art” movement led by poets; and if its means now sometimes seem exaggerated or unripe in retrospect, they carry within them the seed of all that we were later to become.
While Marinetti’s opening mani-festo for Italian Futurism bristled with a polemical stance in favor of the transformed present (1909), the later mainfestos of Futurist poets & artists offered formal/”technical” approaches to the works then getting under way. The key term--still reso-nant today--was parole in liberta 2 , by which poetry was to become “an uninterrupted sequence of new images… (a) strict bet of images or analogies, to be cast into the mysterious sea of phenomena.” This freedom-of-the-world, while it resembled other forms of collage and of image juxtaposition, more fully explored the use of innovative and expressive typography in the visual presentation of language, as set in motion by forerun-ners like Mallarme. But the verbal liberation didn’t end with the page; it moved, rather, toward a new performance art and a poetry that “scurried off the page in all directions at once,” as Emmett Williams phrased it for the “language happenings” of a later decade. Outrageous and aggressive, the Futurists’ performances mixed declamation and gesture, events and sur-roundings, indifference and engagement, to break the barriers between themselves and those who came to jeer or cheer them. Wrote Marinetti selbst 3 (circa 1915): Everything of any value is theatrical.”
captions
These general guidelines
will help you design foot-
notes and endnotes that
are readable, legible and
economical in space.
CAPTIONS
120+
Footnotes and endnotes are necessary com-ponents of scholarly and technical writing. They’re also frequently used by writers of fiction, from Herman Melville (Moby-Dick) to contemporary novelists. Whether their intent is academic or artistic, footnotes present special typographic challenges.
Specifically, a footnote is a text element at the bottom of a page of a book or manu-script that provides additional information about a point made in the main text. The footnote might provide deeper background, offer an alternate interpretation or provide a citation for the source of a quote, idea or statistic. Endnotes serve the same purpose but are grouped together at the end of a chapter, article or book, rather than at the bottom of each page.
captions
+121
These general guidelines
will help you design foot-
notes and endnotes that
are readable, legible and
economical in space.
CAPTIONS
122+
Footnotes are most often indicated by placing a superscript numeral immediately after the text to be referenced. The same superscript numeral then precedes the footnoted text at the bottom of the page. Numbering footnotes is essential when there are many of them, but if footnotes are few they can be marked with a dagger, asterisk, or other symbol instead. Endnotes should always use numerals to facilitate easy referencing.
Footnotes and endnotes are set smaller than body text. The difference in size is usually about two points, but this can vary depending on the size, style and legibil-ity of the main text. Even though they’re smaller, footnotes and endnotes should still remain at a readable size.
captions
+123
124+
1. Philip Meggs, History of Graphic Design, Van Nostrand Reinhold, 1988 2. parole in liberta = words set free (liberty) 3. selbst = himself
WO
RD
S IN
LIB
ERTY
a prologue to futurismFUTURISM was first announced
on February 20, 1909, when the Paris
newspaper Le Figaro published a
manifesto by the Italian poet and editor
Filippo Tommaso Marinetti. The name
‘Futurism’, coined by Marinetti, reflected
his emphasis on discarding what he
conceived to be the static and irrelevant
art of the past, and celebrating change,
originality, and innovation in culture and
society. Futurism rejected traditions and
glorified contemporary life, mainly by
emphasizing two dominant themes: the
machine and motion. The works were
characterized by the depic- tion of several
successive actions of a subject at the
same time. Marinetti’s manifesto glorified
the new technology of the automobile
and the beauty of its speed, power, and
movement. He exalted violence and
conflict and called for the sweeping
repudiation of traditional cultural, social,
and political values, and the destruction
of such cultural institutions as museums
and libraries. The manifesto’s rhetoric
was passionately bombastic; its tone was
aggressive and inflammatory and was
purposely intended to inspire public an-
ger and amazement, to arouse controver-
sy, and to attract widespread attention.
BUT it is the movements which survive, oddly, here where we
live and work as poets and artists; if not the move- ments, then
their sense of art as an life itself survives. All of which, as Futur-
ism, had come sharply into focus by the start of the world war:
a first radical mix of art and life, the epitome in the poplar mind
of an avant-garde. It was, on both its Russian & Italian sides, the
first great “art” movement led by poets; and if its means now
sometimes seem exaggerated or unripe in retrospect, they carry
within them the seed of all that we were later to become.
WHILE Marinetti’s opening manifesto for Italian Futurism
bristled with a polemical stance in favor of the trans- formed
present (1909), the later manifestos of Futurist poets & artists
offered formal “technical” approaches to the works then getting
under way. The key term—still resonant today—was parole in
liberta 2 , by which poetry was to become “an uninterrupted
sequence of new images... (a) strict bet of images or analogies, to
be cast into the mysterious sea of phenomena.” This “freedom
of the world”, while it resembled other forms of collage and
of image juxtaposition, more fully explored the use of innova-
tive and expressive typography in the visual presentation of
language, as set in motion by forerunners like Mallarme. But the
verbal liberation didn’t end with the page; it moved, rather, to-
ward a new performance art and a poetry that “scurried off the
page in all directions at once,” as Emmett Williams phrased it
for the “language happenings” of a later decade. Outrageous and
aggressive, the Futur- ists’ performances mixed declamation and
gesture, events and surroundings, indifference and engagement,
to break the barriers between themselves and those who came
to jeer or cheer them. Wrote Marinetti Selbst 3 (circa 1915):
captions
WORDS IN
LIB
ERTY
+125
1. Philip Meggs, History of Graphic Design, Van Nostr-and Reinhold, 1988 2. parole in liberta = words set free (liberty) 3. selbst = himself
LIB
ERTY
a prologue to futurism: Futur-
ism ws first announced on February
20, 1909, when the Paris newspaper
Le Figaro published a manifesto by
the Italian poet and editor Filippo
Tommaso Marinetti. The name ‘Futur-
ism’, coined by Marinetti, reflected
his emphasis on discarding what he
conceived to be the static and irrel-
evant art of the past, and celebrating
change, originality, and innovation in
culture and society. Futurism rejected
traditions and glorified contempo-
rary life, mainly by emphasizing two
dominant themes: the machine and
motion. The works were characterized
by the depiction of several successive
actions of a subject at the same time.
Marinetti’s manifesto glorified the new
technology of the automobile and the
beauty of its speed, power, and move-
ment. He exalted violence and conflict
and called for the sweeping repudia-
tion of traditional cultural, social, and
political values, and the destruction of
such cultural institutions as muse-
ums and libraries. The manifesto’s
rhetoric was passionately bombastic;
its tone was aggressive and inflamma-
tory and was purposely intended to
inspire public anger and amazement,
to arouse controversy, and to attract widespread attention.
>> But it is the movements which survive, oddly, here
where we live and work as poets and artists; if not the
movements, then their sense of art as an life itself survives.
All of which, as Futurism, had come sharply into focus
by the start of the world war: a first radical mix of art and
life, the epitome in the poplar mind of an avant-garde. It
was, on both its Russian & Italian sides, the first great “art”
movement led by poets; and if its means now sometimes
seem exaggerated or unripe in retrospect, they carry within
them the seed of all that we were later to become. >>
radical mix of art and life: While Marinetti’s opening
manifesto for Italian Futurism bristled with a polemical
stance in favor of the transformed present (1909), the later
manifestos of Futurist poets & artists offered formal “tech-
nical” ap- proaches to the works then getting under way.
The key term—still resonant today—was parole in liberta
2 , by which poetry was to become “an uninterrupted se-
quence of new images... (a) strict bet of images or analogies,
to be cast into the mysterious sea of phenomena.” This
“freedom of the world”, while it re- sembled other forms of
collage and of image juxtaposition, more fully explored the
use of innovative and expressive typography in the visual
presentation of language, as set in motion by forerunners
like Mal- larme. But the verbal liberation didn’t end with
the page; it moved, rather, toward a new performance art
and a poetry that “scurried off the page in all directions
at once,” as Emmett Williams phrased it for the “language
happenings” of a later decade. Outrageous and aggres-
sive, the Futurists’ performances mixed declamation and
gesture, events and surroundings, indifference and engage-
ment, to break the barriers between themselves and those
who came to jeer or cheer them. Wrote Marinetti Selbst 3
126+
1. Philip Meggs, History of Graphic Design, Van Nostr-and Reinhold, 1988
2. parole in liberta= words set free (liberty)
3. selbst = himself
a prologue to futurism
radical mix of art and life
WORDS IN LIBERTYFuturism was first announced on Feb-
ruary 20, 1909, when the Paris news-
paper Le Figaro published a manifesto
by the Italian poet and editor Filippo
Tommaso Marinetti. The name ‘Futur-
ism’, coined by Marinetti, reflected his
emphasis on discarding what he con-
ceived to be the static and irrelevant
art of the past, and celebrating change,
originality, and innovation in culture
and society. Futurism rejected tradi-
tions and glorified contemporary life,
mainly by emphasizing two dominant
themes: the machine and motion. The
works were characterized by the depic-
tion of several successive actions of a
subject at the same time. Marinetti’s
manifesto glorified the new technology
of the automobile and the beauty of its
speed, power, and movement. He exalt-
ed violence and conflict and called for
the sweeping repudiation of traditional
cultural, social, and political values,
and the destruction of such cultural
institutions as museums and libraries.
The manifesto’s rhetoric was passion-
ately bombastic; its tone was aggressive
and inflammatory and was purposely
intended to inspire public anger and
amazement, to arouse controversy, and
to attract widespread attention.
But it is the movements which sur-
vive, oddly, here where we live and work as poets and
artists; if not the move- ments, then their sense of art as an
life itself survives. All of which, as Futurism, had come
sharply into focus by the start of the world war: a first radi-
cal mix of art and life, the epitome in the poplar mind of
an avant-garde. It was, on both its Russian & Italian sides,
the first great “art” movement led by poets; and if its means
now sometimes seem exaggerated or unripe in retrospect,
they carry within them the seed of all that we were later to
become.
While Marinetti’s opening manifesto for Italian Futurism
bristled with a polemical stance in favor
of the transformed present (1909), the later manifestos of
Futurist poets & artists offered formal “technical” ap-
proaches to the works then getting under way. The key
term—still resonant today—was parole in liberta 2 , by
which poetry was to be- come “an uninterrupted sequence
of new images... (a) strict bet of images or analogies, to be
cast into the mysteri- ous sea of phenomena.” This “free-
dom of the world”, while it resembled other forms of col-
lage and of image juxta- position, more fully explored the
use of innovative and expressive typography in the visual
presentation of language, as set in motion by forerunners
like Mallarme. But the verbal liberation didn’t end with the
page; it moved, rather, toward a new performance art and a
poetry that “scurried off the page in all directions at once,”
as Emmett Williams phrased it for the “language happen-
ings” of a later decade. Outrageous and aggressive, the
Futurists’ performances mixed declamation and gesture,
events and surroundings, indifference and engagement,
to break the barriers be- tween themselves and those who
came to jeer or cheer them. Wrote Marinetti Selbst 3 (circa
1915): “Everything of any value is theatrical.”
captions
+127
1. P
hil
ip M
eggs
, His
tory
of G
rap
hic
Des
ign
, V
an N
ostr
and
Rei
nh
old
, 198
8 2.
par
ole
in li
bert
a =
wor
ds
set f
ree
(lib
erty
) 3.
sel
bst =
him
self
a pr
olog
ue
to fu
turi
sm
radical mix of art and life
Futurism was first an-nounced on February 20, 1909, when the Paris new paper Le Figara published a manifesto by the Italian poet and editor Filippo Tommaso Marinetti. The na Futurism, coined by Marinetti, reflect-ed his emphasis on discard-ing what he conceived to be the static and irrelevant art of the past and celebrat-ing change, originality, and innovation in culture and society. Futurism rejected traditions and glorified contemporary life, mainly by emphasizing two dominant themes, the machine and motion. The works were characterized by the depiction of several successive actions of a subject at the same time. Marinetti’s manifesto glo-rified the new technology of the automo-bile and the beauty of its speed, power, and movement. He exalted violence and conflict and called for the sweeping repudiation of traditional cultural, social, and political values and the destruction of such cultural institutions as museums and libraries. The manifesto’s rhetoric was passionately bombastic; its tone was aggressive and inflammatory and was purposely intended to inspire public an-ger and amazement, to arouse contrversy, and to attract widespread attention.
But is is the movements which survive, oddly, here where we live an work as poets and artists: or, if not the movements, then their sense of art as an life itself. All of which, as futurism, had come sharply into focus by the start of the world war: a first radical mix of art and life, the epitome in the poplar mind of an avant-garde. It was, on both its Russian & Italian sides, the first great “art” movement led by poets; and if its means now sometimes seem exaggerated or unripe in retrospect, they carry within
them the seed of all that we were later to become.
While Marinetti’s opening manifesto for Italian Futurism bristled with a polemical stance in favor of the transformed present (1909), the later mainfestos of Futurist poets & artists offered formal/”technical” approaches to the works then getting under way. The key term--still resonant today--was parole in liberta 2 , by which poetry was to become “an uninterrupted sequence of new images… (a) strict bet of images or analogies, to be cast into the mysterious sea of phenomena.” This freedom-of-the-world, while it resembled other forms of collage and of image juxtapo-sition, more fully explored the use of innovative and expressive typography in the visual presentation of language, as set in motion by forerunners like Mallarme. But the verbal liberation didn’t end with the page; it moved, rather, toward a new performance art and a poetry that “scurried off the page in all directions at once,” as Emmett Williams phrased it for the “language happenings” of a later decade. Outrageous and aggressive, the Futurists’ performances mixed declamation and gesture, events and surroundings, indif-ference and engagement, to break the barriers between themselves and those who came to jeer or cheer them. Wrote Marinetti selbst 3 (circa 1915): Everything of any value is theatrical.”
128+
1. Philip Meggs, History of Graphic Design, Van Nostrand Reinhold, 1988 2. parole in liberta = words set free (liberty) 3. selbst = himself
WO
RD
S IN
LIBERTYFUTURISM WAS FIRST AN-NOUNCED ON FEBRUARY 20, 1909, when the Paris newspaper
Le Figaro published a manifesto by the
Italian poet and editor Filippo Tommaso
Marinetti. The name ‘Futurism’, coined
by Marinetti, reflected his emphasis on
discarding what he conceived to be the
static and irrelevant art of the past, and
celebrating change, originality, and in-
novation in culture and society. Futurism
rejected traditions and glorified con-
temporary life, mainly by emphasizing
two dominant themes: the machine and
motion. The works were characterized
by the depiction of several successive
actions of a subject at the same time.
Marinetti’s manifesto glorified the new
technology of the automobile and the
beauty of its speed, power, and move-
ment. He exalted vio- lence and conflict
and called for the sweeping repudiation
of traditional cultural, social, and politi-
cal values, and the destruction of such
cultural institutions as museums and
libraries. The manifesto’s rhetoric was
passionately bombas- tic; its tone was ag-
gressive and inflammatory and was pur-
posely intended to inspire public anger
and amazement, to arouse controversy,
and to attract widespread attention.
BUT IT IS THE MOVEMENTS WHICH SUR-VIVE, ODDLY, HERE WHERE
we live and work as poets and artists; if not the move-
ments, then their sense of art as an life itself survives. All of
which, as Futurism, had come sharply into focus by the start of
the world war: a first radical mix of art and life, the epitome in
the poplar mind of an avant-garde. It was, on both its Russian &
Italian sides, the first great “art” movement led by poets; and if
its means now sometimes seem exaggerated or unripe in retro-
spect, they carry within them the seed of all that we were later
to become.
WHILE MARINETTI’S OPENING MANIFES-TO FOR ITALIAN FUTURISM bristled with a polemical stance in favor of the trans-
formed present (1909), the later manifestos of Futurist poets
& artists offered formal “technical” approaches to the works
then getting under way. The key term—still resonant today—
was parole in liberta 2 , by which poetry was to become “an
uninterrupted sequence of new images... (a) strict bet of images
or analogies, to be cast into the mysterious sea of phenomena.”
This “freedom of the world”, while it resembled other forms of
collage and of image juxtaposition, more fully explored the use
of innovative and expressive typography in the visual presenta-
tion of language, as set in motion by forerunners like Mallarme.
But the verbal liberation didn’t end with the page; it moved,
rather, toward a new performance art and a poetry that “scur-
ried off the page in all directions at once,” as Emmett Williams
phrased it for the “language happenings” of a later decade.
Outrageous and aggressive, the Futurists’ performances mixed
declamation and gesture, events and surroundings, indifference
and engagement, to break the barriers between themselves and
those who came to jeer or cheer them. Wrote Marinetti Selbst 3
(circa 1915): “Everything of any value is theatrical.”
captions
+129
1. Philip Meggs, History of Graphic Design, Van Nostrand Reinhold, 1988
2. parole in liberta = words set free (liberty)
3. selbst = himself
a prologue to futurism
radical mix of art and life
WORDS
IN LIBERTY
Futurism was first announced on February 20, 1909, when the Paris newspaper Le Figaro published a manifesto by the Italian poet and editor Filippo Tommaso Marinetti. The name Futurism, coined by Marinetti, reflected his emphasis on discarding what he conceived to be the static and irrelevant art of the past and celebrating change, originality, and innovation in culture and society.1 Fu-turism rejected traditions and glorified contemporary life, mainly by emphasiz-ing two dominant themes, the machine and motion. The works were character-ized by the depiction of several suc-cessive actions of a subject at the same time. Marinetti’s manifesto glorified the new technology of the automobile and the beauty of its speed, power, and movement. He exalted violence and conflict and called for the sweeping re-pudiation of traditional cultural, social, and political values and the destruc-tion of such cultural institutions as museums and libraries. The manifesto’s rhetoric was passionately bombastic; its tone was aggressive and inflammatory and was purposely intended to inspire public anger and amazement, to arouse controversy, and to attract widespread attention.
But is is the movements which survive, oddly, here where we live and work as poets and artists: or, if not the movements, then their sense of art as an life itself. All of which, as futurism, had come sharply into focus by the start of the world war: a first radical mix of art and life, the epitome in the poplar mind of an avant-garde. It was, on both its Russian
& Italian sides, the first great “art” movement led by poets; and if its means now sometimes seem exaggerated or unripe in retrospect, they carry within them the seed of all that we were later to become.
While Marinetti’s opening mani-festo for Italian Futurism bristled with a polemical stance in favor of the transformed present (1909), the later mainfestos of Futurist poets & artists offered formal/”technical” approaches to the works then getting under way. The key term--still reso-nant today--was parole in liberta 2 , by which poetry was to become “an uninterrupted sequence of new images… (a) strict bet of images or analogies, to be cast into the mysterious sea of phenomena.” This freedom-of-the-world, while it resembled other forms of collage and of image juxtaposition, more fully explored the use of innovative and expressive typography in the visual presentation of language, as set in motion by forerun-ners like Mallarme. But the verbal liberation didn’t end with the page; it moved, rather, toward a new performance art and a poetry that “scurried off the page in all directions at once,” as Emmett Williams phrased it for the “language happenings” of a later decade. Outrageous and aggressive, the Futurists’ performances mixed declamation and gesture, events and sur-roundings, indifference and engagement, to break the barriers between themselves and those who came to jeer or cheer them. Wrote Marinetti selbst 3 (circa 1915): Everything of any value is theatrical.”
font specs
CLASSIFICATION
“By all means break the
rules, and break them
beautifully, deliberately,
and well. That is one of
the ends for which they
exist.” —Robert Bringhurst
132+
font specs
+133
Every font came from a basic straight line, but each font has its own curve and flair for itself. Within the next few pages, a selection of fonts have been chosen to explore the dif-ferent styles, thickness, and size. With slight line adjustments and serifs added, each character becomes unique to its specific font family and displays its own personality.
Throughout this book, typography has been shown through a multitude of ways: poorly with bad kearning, and nicely with surpris-ing font combinations. The only true way to develop a relationship with type is to study it, read it, breathe it, and live it. So begin exhaling.
archerslab serif
MaxogGdQRstBOOK
HAIRLINE
SEMI-BOLD
BOLD ITALIC
A basic system for classifying typefaces was devised in the nineteenth century, when printers sought to identify a heritage for their own craft analogous to that of art history. Humanist letterforms are closely connected to calligraphy and the movement of the hand. Transitional and modern typefaces are more abstract and less organic. These three main groups correspond roughly to the Renaissance, Baroque, and Enlightenment periods in art and literature. Designers in the twentieth and twenty-first centuries have continued to create new typefaces based on historic characteristics.
A basic system for classifying typefaces was devised in the nineteenth century, when printers sought to identify a heri-tage for their own craft analogous to that of art history. Humanist letterforms are closely connected to calligraphy and the movement of the hand. Transitional and modern typefaces are more abstract and less organic. These three main groups correspond roughly to the Renaissance, Baroque, and Enlightenment periods in art and literature. Designers in the twentieth and twenty-first centuries have continued to create new typefaces based on historic characteristics.
Aa Bb Cc Dd Ee Ff Gg Hh Ii Jj Kk Ll Mm Nn Oo Pp Qq Rr Ss Tt Uu Vv Ww Xx Yy Zz 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 ( ) { } ? ! @ & *
Aa Bb Cc Dd Ee Ff Gg Hh Ii Jj Kk Ll Mm Nn Oo Pp Qq Rr Ss Tt Uu Vv Ww Xx Yy Zz 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 ( ) { } ? ! @ & *
Aa Bb Cc Dd Ee Ff Gg Hh Ii Jj Kk Ll Mm Nn Oo Pp Qq Rr Ss Tt Uu Vv Ww Xx Yy Zz 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 { } ? ! @ & *
Aa Bb Cc Dd Ee Ff Gg Hh Ii Jj Kk Ll Mm Nn Oo Pp Qq Rr Ss Tt Uu Vv Ww Xx Yy Zz 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 { } ? ! @ & *
font specs
MaxogGdQRstROMAN
BOLD
BLACK
A basic system for classifying typefaces was devised in the nineteenth century, when printers sought to identify a heritage for their own craft analogous to that of art history. Humanist letterforms are closely connected to calligraphy and the movement of the hand. Transitional and modern typefaces are more abstract and less organic. These three main groups correspond roughly to the Renaissance, Baroque, and Enlightenment periods in art and literature. Designers in the twentieth and twenty-first centuries have continued to create new typefaces based on historic characteristics.
A basic system for classifying typefac-es was devised in the nineteenth cen-tury, when printers sought to identify a heritage for their own craft analo-gous to that of art history. Humanist letterforms are closely connected to calligraphy and the movement of the hand. Transitional and modern typefac-es are more abstract and less organic. These three main groups correspond roughly to the Renaissance, Baroque, and Enlightenment periods in art and literature. Designers in the twentieth and twenty-first centuries have contin-ued to create new typefaces based on historic characteristics.
Aa Bb Cc Dd Ee Ff Gg Hh Ii Jj Kk Ll Mm Nn Oo Pp Qq Rr Ss Tt Uu Vv Ww Xx Yy Zz 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 ( ) { } ? ! @ & *
Aa Bb Cc Dd Ee Ff Gg Hh Ii Jj Kk Ll Mm Nn Oo Pp Qq Rr Ss Tt Uu Vv Ww Xx Yy Zz 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 ( ) { } ? ! @ & *
Aa Bb Cc Dd Ee Ff Gg Hh Ii Jj Kk Ll Mm Nn Oo Pp Qq Rr Ss Tt Uu Vv Ww Xx Yy Zz 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 ( ) { } ? ! @ & *
akzidenz grotesksan serif
MxaogGdQRtREGULAR
SMALL CAPS
ITALIC
BOLD
A basic system for classifying typefaces was devised in the nineteenth century, when printers sought to identify a heritage for their own craft analogous to that of art history. Humanist letterforms are closely connected to calligraphy and the movement of the hand. Transitional and modern typefaces are more abstract and less organic. These three main groups cor-respond roughly to the Renaissance, Ba-roque, and Enlightenment periods in art and literature. Designers in the twentieth and twenty-first centuries have continued to create new typefaces based on historic characteristics.
A basic system for classifying typefaces was devised in the nineteenth century, when printers sought to identify a heritage for their own craft analogous to that of art history. Humanist letterforms are closely connected to calligraphy and the movement of the hand. Transitional and modern typefaces are more abstract and less organic. These three main groups correspond roughly to the Renaissance, Baroque, and Enlightenment periods in art and literature. Designers in the twentieth and twenty-first centuries have continued to create new typefaces based on historic characteristics.
Aa Bb Cc Dd Ee Ff Gg Hh Ii Jj Kk Ll Mm Nn Oo Pp Qq Rr Ss Tt Uu Vv Ww Xx Yy Zz 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 ( ) { } ? ! @ & *
Aa Bb Cc Dd Ee Ff Gg Hh Ii Jj Kk Ll Mm Nn Oo Pp Qq Rr Ss Tt Uu Vv Ww Xx Yy Zz 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 ( ) { } ? ! @ & *
Aa Bb Cc Dd Ee Ff Gg Hh Ii Jj Kk Ll Mm Nn Oo Pp Qq Rr Ss Tt Uu Vv Ww Xx Yy Zz 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 ( ) { } ? ! @ & *
Aa Bb Cc Dd Ee Ff Gg Hh Ii Jj Kk Ll Mm Nn Oo Pp Qq Rr Ss Tt Uu Vv Ww Xx Yy Zz 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 ( ) { } ? ! @ & *
baskervilletranstional
font specs
MxagGdQrRREGULAR
ITALIC
BOLD
BLACK ITALIC
A basic system for classifying type-faces was devised in the nineteenth century, when printers sought to identify a heritage for their own craft analogous to that of art histo-ry. Humanist letterforms are closely connected to calligraphy and the movement of the hand. Transitional and modern typefaces are more ab-stract and less organic. These three main groups correspond roughly to the Renaissance, Baroque, and Enlightenment periods in art and literature. Designers in the twenti-eth and twenty-first centuries have continued to create new typefaces based on historic characteristics.
A basic system for classifying typefac-es was devised in the nineteenth cen-tury, when printers sought to identify a heritage for their own craft analogous to that of art history. Humanist letter-forms are closely connected to callig-raphy and the movement of the hand. Transitional and modern typefaces are more abstract and less organic. These three main groups correspond roughly to the Renaissance, Baroque, and Enlightenment periods in art and literature. Designers in the twentieth and twenty-first centuries have con-tinued to create new typefaces based on historic characteristics.
Aa Bb Cc Dd Ee Ff Gg Hh Ii Jj Kk Ll Mm Nn Oo Pp Qq Rr Ss Tt Uu Vv Ww Xx Yy Zz 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 ( ) { } ? ! @ & *
Aa Bb Cc Dd Ee Ff Gg Hh Ii Jj Kk Ll Mm Nn Oo Pp Qq Rr Ss Tt Uu Vv Ww Xx Yy Zz 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 ( ) { } ? ! @ & *
Aa Bb Cc Dd Ee Ff Gg Hh Ii Jj Kk Ll Mm Nn Oo Pp Qq Rr Ss Tt Uu Vv Ww Xx Yy Zz 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 ( ) { } ? ! @ & *
Aa Bb Cc Dd Ee Ff Gg Hh Ii Jj Kk Ll Mm Nn Oo Pp Qq Rr Ss Tt Uu Vv Ww Xx Yy Zz 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 ( ) { } ? ! @ & *
belizioslab serif
LIGHT
BOLD
BLACK
A basic system for classifying typefaces
was devised in the nineteenth century, when
printers sought to identify a heritage for their
own craft analogous to that of art history.
Humanist letterforms are closely connected
to calligraphy and the movement of the hand.
Transitional and modern typefaces are more
abstract and less organic. These three main
groups correspond roughly to the Renais-
sance, Baroque, and Enlightenment periods in
art and literature. Designers in the twentieth
and twenty-first centuries have continued
to create new typefaces based on historic
characteristics.
Aa Bb Cc Dd Ee Ff Gg Hh Ii Jj Kk Ll Mm Nn Oo Pp Qq Rr Ss Tt Uu Vv Ww Xx Yy Zz 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 ( ) { } ? ! @ & *
Aa Bb Cc Dd Ee Ff Gg Hh Ii Jj Kk Ll Mm Nn Oo Pp Qq Rr Ss Tt Uu Vv Ww Xx Yy Zz 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 ( ) { } ? ! @ & *
Aa Bb Cc Dd Ee Ff Gg Hh Ii Jj Kk Ll Mm Nn Oo Pp Qq Rr Ss Tt Uu Vv Ww Xx Yy Zz 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 ( ) { } ? ! @ & *
bell gothicslab serif
MxagGdQrRI
MxagGdQrRI
font specs
MxnogGdQrRstA basic system for classifying typefaces was
devised in the nineteenth century, when print-
ers sought to identify a heritage for their own
craft analogous to that of art history. Humanist
letterforms are closely connected to calligraphy
and the movement of the hand. Transitional
and modern typefaces are more abstract and
less organic. These three main groups cor-
respond roughly to the Renaissance, Baroque,
and Enlightenment periods in art and literature.
Designers in the twentieth and twenty-first
centuries have continued to create new type-
faces based on historic characteristics.
A basic system for classifying typefaces
was devised in the nineteenth century,
when printers sought to identify a heri-
tage for their own craft analogous to that
of art history. Humanist letterforms are
closely connected to calligraphy and the
movement of the hand. Transitional and
modern typefaces are more abstract and
less organic. These three main groups
correspond roughly to the Renaissance,
Baroque, and Enlightenment periods
in art and literature. Designers in the
twentieth and twenty-first centuries have
continued to create new typefaces based
on historic characteristics.
Aa Bb Cc Dd Ee Ff Gg Hh Ii Jj Kk Ll Mm Nn Oo Pp Qq Rr Ss Tt Uu Vv Ww Xx Yy Zz 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 ( ) { } ? ! @ & *
Aa Bb Cc Dd Ee Ff Gg Hh Ii Jj Kk Ll Mm Nn Oo Pp Qq Rr Ss Tt Uu Vv Ww Xx Yy Zz 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 ( ) { } ? ! @ & *
Aa Bb Cc Dd Ee Ff Gg Hh Ii Jj Kk Ll Mm Nn Oo Pp Qq Rr Ss Tt Uu Vv Ww Xx Yy Zz 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 ( ) { } ? ! @ & *
Aa Bb Cc Dd Ee Ff Gg Hh Ii Jj Kk Ll Mm Nn Oo Pp Qq Rr Ss Tt Uu Vv Ww Xx Yy Zz 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 ( ) { } ? ! @ & *
REGULAR
ITALIC
BOLD
EXTRA BOLD
bembomodern
A basic system for classifying type-faces was devised in the nineteenth century, when printers sought to identify a heritage for their own craft analogous to that of art history. Hu-manist letterforms are closely con-nected to calligraphy and the move-ment of the hand. Transitional and modern typefaces are more abstract and less organic. These three main groups correspond roughly to the Renaissance, Baroque, and Enlight-enment periods in art and literature. Designers in the twentieth and twenty-first centuries have continued to create new typefaces based on historic characteristics.
A basic system for classifying type-faces was devised in the nineteenth century, when printers sought to identify a heritage for their own craft analogous to that of art his-tory. Humanist letterforms are closely connected to calligraphy and the movement of the hand. Transitional and modern typefaces are more abstract and less organic. These three main groups corre-spond roughly to the Renaissance, Baroque, and Enlightenment peri-ods in art and literature. Designers in the twentieth and twenty-first centuries have continued to create new typefaces based on historic characteristics.
Aa Bb Cc Dd Ee Ff Gg Hh Ii Jj Kk Ll Mm Nn Oo Pp Qq Rr Ss Tt Uu Vv Ww Xx Yy Zz 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 ( ) { } ? ! @ & *
Aa Bb Cc Dd Ee Ff Gg Hh Ii Jj Kk Ll Mm Nn Oo Pp Qq Rr Ss Tt Uu Vv Ww Xx Yy Zz 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 ( ) { } ? ! @ & *
Aa Bb Cc Dd Ee Ff Gg Hh Ii Jj Kk Ll Mm Nn Oo Pp Qq Rr Ss Tt Uu Vv Ww Xx Yy Zz 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 ( ) { } ? ! @ & *
Aa Bb Cc Dd Ee Ff Gg Hh Ii Jj Kk Ll Mm Nn Oo Pp Qq Rr Ss Tt Uu Vv Ww Xx Yy Zz 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 ( ) { } ? ! @ & *
REGULAR
ITALIC
BOLD
BOLD ITALIC
MxaogGdQrR
bookmantransitional
MxaogGdQrR
font specs
MxaogGdQrRstA basic system for classifying typefaces was devised in the nineteenth century, when printers sought to identify a heritage for their own craft analogous to that of art history. Humanist letterforms are closely connected to calligraphy and the move-ment of the hand. Transitional and modern typefaces are more abstract and less or-ganic. These three main groups correspond roughly to the Renaissance, Baroque, and Enlightenment periods in art and literature. Designers in the twentieth and twenty-first centuries have continued to create new typefaces based on historic characteristics.
A basic system for classifying typefaces was devised in the nineteenth century, when printers sought to identify a heritage for their own craft analogous to that of art history. Humanist letterforms are closely connected to calligraphy and the move-ment of the hand. Transitional and modern typefaces are more abstract and less or-ganic. These three main groups correspond roughly to the Renaissance, Baroque, and Enlightenment periods in art and literature. Designers in the twentieth and twenty-first centuries have continued to create new typefaces based on historic characteristics.
Aa Bb Cc Dd Ee Ff Gg Hh Ii Jj Kk Ll Mm Nn Oo Pp Qq Rr Ss Tt Uu Vv Ww Xx Yy Zz 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 ( ) { } ? ! @ & * 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9
Aa Bb Cc Dd Ee Ff Gg Hh Ii Jj Kk Ll Mm Nn Oo Pp Qq Rr Ss Tt Uu Vv Ww Xx Yy Zz 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 ( ) { } ? ! @ & *
Aa Bb Cc Dd Ee Ff Gg Hh Ii Jj Kk Ll Mm Nn Oo Pp Qq Rr Ss Tt Uu Vv Ww Xx Yy Zz 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 ( ) { } ? ! @ & *
REGULAR
ITALIC
BOLD
bodonimodern
REGULAR
ITALIC
SWASH
ORNAMENT
ALTERNATE
A basic system for classifying typefaces was devised in the nineteenth century, when printers sought to identify a heritage for their own craft analogous to that of art history. Humanist letterforms are closely connected to calligraphy and the movement of the hand. Transitional and modern typefaces are more abstract and less organic. These three main groups correspond roughly to the Renaissance, Baroque, and Enlightenment periods in art and literature. Designers in the twentieth and twenty-first centuries have continued to create new typefaces based on historic characteristics.
A basic system for classifying typefaces was devised in the nineteenth century, when printers sought to identify a heritage for their own craft analogous to that of art history. Humanist letterforms are closely connected to calligraphy and the movement of the hand. Transitional and modern typefaces are more abstract and less organic. These three main groups correspond roughly to the Renaissance, Baroque, and Enlightenment periods in art and literature. Designers in the twentieth and twenty-first centuries have continued to create new typefaces based on historic characteristics.
Aa Bb Cc Dd Ee Ff Gg Hh Ii Jj Kk Ll Mm Nn Oo Pp Qq Rr Ss Tt Uu Vv Ww Xx Yy Zz 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 ( ) { } ? ! @ & *
Aa Bb Cc Dd Ee Ff Gg Hh Ii Jj Kk Ll Mm Nn Oo Pp Qq Rr Ss Tt Uu Vv Ww Xx Yy Zz 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 ( ) { } ? ! @ & *
Aa Ba Ca Da Ea Fa Ga Ha Ia Ja Ka La Ma Na Oa Pa Qa Ra Sa Ta Ua Va Wa Xa Ya Z
A a Bb C c D d Ee F f G g H h Ii Jj Kk Ll Mm Nn Oo Pp Qq Or S s Ot Uu Vv Ww X x y Z z 1 2 3 4
c h i k l Ss T t
caslontransitional
MxanogGdQRt
MxanogGdQRt
font specs
MxaogGdQrRt
BOLD ITALIC
A basic system for classifying typefaces was devised in the nineteenth century, when printers sought to identify a heritage for their own craft analogous to that of art history. Humanist letterforms are closely connected to calligraphy and the movement of the hand. Transitional and modern typefaces are more abstract and less organic. These three main groups correspond roughly to the Renaissance, Baroque, and Enlightenment periods in art and literature. Designers in the twentieth and twenty-first centuries have continued to create new typefaces based on historic characteristics.
A basic system for classifying typefaces was devised in the nineteenth century, when printers sought to identify a heri-tage for their own craft analogous to that of art history. Humanist letterforms are closely connected to calligraphy and the movement of the hand. Transitional and modern typefaces are more abstract and less organic. These three main groups correspond roughly to the Renaissance, Baroque, and Enlightenment periods in art and literature. Designers in the twentieth and twenty-first centuries have continued to create new typefaces based on historic characteristics.
Aa Bb Cc Dd Ee Ff Gg Hh Ii Jj Kk Ll Mm Nn Oo Pp Qq Rr Ss Tt Uu Vv Ww Xx Yy Zz 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 ( ) { } ? ! @ & * 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9
Aa Bb Cc Dd Ee Ff Gg Hh Ii Jj Kk Ll Mm Nn Oo Pp Qq Rr Ss Tt Uu Vv Ww Xx Yy Zz 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 ( ) { } ? ! @ & *
Aa Bb Cc Dd Ee Ff Gg Hh Ii Jj Kk Ll Mm Nn Oo Pp Qq Rr Ss Tt Uu Vv Ww Xx Yy Zz 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 ( ) { } ? ! @ & *
Aa Bb Cc Dd Ee Ff Gg Hh Ii Jj Kk Ll Mm Nn Oo Pp Qq Rr Ss Tt Uu Vv Ww Xx Yy Zz 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 ( ) { } ? ! @ & *
REGULAR
ITALIC
BOLD
century schoolbookgrotesque
REGULAR
ITALIC
BOLD
BOLD ITALIC
A basic system for classifying typefaces was devised in the nineteenth century, when printers sought to identify a heri-tage for their own craft analogous to that of art history. Humanist letterforms are closely connected to calligraphy and the movement of the hand. Transitional and modern typefaces are more abstract and less organic. These three main groups correspond roughly to the Renaissance, Baroque, and Enlightenment periods in art and literature. Designers in the twentieth and twenty-first centuries have continued to create new typefaces based on historic characteristics.
A basic system for classifying typefaces was devised in the nineteenth century, when printers sought to identify a heritage for their own craft analogous to that of art history. Humanist letterforms are closely connected to calligraphy and the movement of the hand. Transitional and modern typefaces are more abstract and less organic. These three main groups correspond roughly to the Renaissance, Baroque, and Enlightenment periods in art and literature. Designers in the twentieth and twenty-first centuries have continued to create new typefaces based on historic characteristics.
Aa Bb Cc Dd Ee Ff Gg Hh Ii Jj Kk Ll Mm Nn Oo Pp Qq Rr Ss Tt Uu Vv Ww Xx Yy Zz 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 ( ) { } ? ! @ & *
Aa Bb Cc Dd Ee Ff Gg Hh Ii Jj Kk Ll Mm Nn Oo Pp Qq Rr Ss Tt Uu Vv Ww Xx Yy Zz 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 ( ) { } ? ! @ & *
Aa Bb Cc Dd Ee Ff Gg Hh Ii Jj Kk Ll Mm Nn Oo Pp Qq Rr Ss Tt Uu Vv Ww Xx Yy Zz 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 ( ) { } ? ! @ & *
Aa Bb Cc Dd Ee Ff Gg Hh Ii Jj Kk Ll Mm Nn Oo Pp Qq Rr Ss Tt Uu Vv Ww Xx Yy Zz 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 ( ) { } ? ! @ & *
cheltenhamtransitional
MaxogGdQrRs
MaxogGdQrRs
font specs
MaxnogGdQrRstUNICASE
REGULAR
A basic system for classifying typefaces was devised in the nineteenth century, when printers sought to identify a heritage for their own craft analogous to that of art his-tory. Humanist letterforms are closely con-nected to calligraphy and the movement of the hand. Transitional and modern typefaces are more abstract and less organic. These three main groups correspond roughly to the Renaissance, Baroque, and Enlightenment periods in art and literature. Designers in the twentieth and twenty-first centuries have continued to create new typefaces based on historic characteristics.
A basic system for classifying typefaces
was devised in the nineteenth century,
when printers sought to identify a heri-
tage for their own craft analogous to that
of art history. Humanist letterforms are
closely connected to calligraphy and the
movement of the hand. Transitional and
modern typefaces are more abstract and
less organic. These three main groups
correspond roughly to the Renaissance,
Baroque, and Enlightenment periods in art
and literature. Designers in the twentieth
and twenty-first centuries have continued
to create new typefaces based on historic
characteristics.
Aa Bb Cc Dd Ee Ff Gg Hh Ii Jj Kk Ll Mm Nn
Oo Pp Qq Rr Ss Tt Uu Vv Ww Xx Yy Zz 1 2
3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 ( ) { } ? ! @ & *
Aa Bb Cc Dd Ee Ff Gg Hh Ii Jj Kk Ll Mm Nn Oo Pp Qq Rr Ss Tt Uu Vv Ww Xx Yy Zz 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 ( ) { } ? ! @ & *
chollamodern
MxagGdQrRtA basic system for classifying type-faces was devised in the nineteenth century, when printers sought to identify a heritage for their own craft analogous to that of art history. Humanist letterforms are closely con-nected to calligraphy and the move-ment of the hand. Transitional and modern typefaces are more abstract and less organic. These three main groups correspond roughly to the Renaissance, Baroque, and Enlight-enment periods in art and literature. Designers in the twentieth and twen-ty-first centuries have continued to create new typefaces based on historic characteristics.
A basic system for classifying type-faces was devised in the nineteenth century, when printers sought to identify a heritage for their own craft analogous to that of art histo-ry. Humanist letterforms are closely connected to calligraphy and the movement of the hand. Transitional and modern typefaces are more ab-stract and less organic. These three main groups correspond roughly to the Renaissance, Baroque, and Enlightenment periods in art and literature. Designers in the twenti-eth and twenty-first centuries have continued to create new typefaces based on historic characteristics.
Aa Bb Cc Dd Ee Ff Gg Hh Ii Jj Kk Ll Mm Nn Oo Pp Qq Rr Ss Tt Uu Vv Ww Xx Yy Zz 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 ( ) { } ? ! @ & *
Aa Bb Cc Dd Ee Ff Gg Hh Ii Jj Kk Ll Mm Nn Oo Pp Qq Rr Ss Tt Uu Vv Ww Xx Yy Zz 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 ( ) { } ? ! @ & *
Aa Bb Cc Dd Ee Ff Gg Hh Ii Jj Kk Ll Mm Nn Oo Pp Qq Rr Ss Tt Uu Vv Ww Xx Yy Zz 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 ( ) { } ? ! @ & *
LIGHT
REGULAR
BOLD
clarendonslab serif
MxagGdQrRt
font specs
MaxnogGdQRsREGULAR
A basic system for classifying type-faces was devised in the nineteenth century, when printers sought to identify a heritage for their own craft analogous to that of art histo-ry. Humanist letterforms are closely connected to calligraphy and the movement of the hand. Transitional and modern typefaces are more ab-stract and less organic. These three main groups correspond roughly to the Renaissance, Baroque, and Enlightenment periods in art and literature. Designers in the twenti-eth and twenty-first centuries have continued to create new typefaces based on historic characteristics.
Aa Bb Cc Dd Ee Ff Gg Hh Ii Jj Kk Ll Mm Nn Oo Pp Qq Rr Ss Tt Uu Vv Ww Xx Yy Zz 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 ( ) { } ? ! @ & *
clickerslab serif
MxaogGdQrRtA basic system for classifying typefaces was devised in the nineteenth century, when printers sought to identify a heri-tage for their own craft analogous to that of art history. Humanist letterforms are closely connected to calligraphy and the movement of the hand. Transitional and modern typefaces are more abstract and less organic. These three main groups correspond roughly to the Renaissance, Baroque, and Enlightenment periods in art and literature. Designers in the twentieth and twenty-first centuries have continued to create new typefaces based on historic characteristics.
A basic system for classifying typefaces was devised in the nineteenth century, when printers sought to identify a heritage for their own craft analogous to that of art history. Humanist letterforms are closely connected to calligraphy and the movement of the hand. Transitional and modern typefaces are more abstract and less organic. These three main groups correspond roughly to the Renais-sance, Baroque, and Enlightenment periods in art and literature. Designers in the twenti-eth and twenty-first centuries have continued to create new typefaces based on historic characteristics.
Aa Bb Cc Dd Ee Ff Gg Hh Ii Jj Kk Ll Mm Nn Oo Pp Qq Rr Ss Tt Uu Vv Ww Xx Yy Zz 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 ( ) { } ? ! @ & * 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9
Aa Bb Cc Dd Ee Ff Gg Hh Ii Jj Kk Ll Mm Nn Oo Pp Qq Rr Ss Tt Uu Vv Ww Xx Yy Zz 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 ( ) { } ? ! @ & *
Aa Bb Cc Dd Ee Ff Gg Hh Ii Jj Kk Ll Mm Nn Oo Pp Qq Rr Ss Tt Uu Vv Ww Xx Yy Zz 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 ( ) { } ? ! @ & *
REGULAR
ITALIC
BOLD
didotmodern
MxaogGdQrRt
font specs
LIGHT
REGULAR
MEDIUM
BLACK
A basic system for classifying typefaces was devised in the nineteenth century, when printers sought to identify a heritage for their own craft analogous to that of art history. Humanist letterforms are closely connected to calligraphy and the movement of the hand. Transitional and modern typefaces are more abstract and less organic. These three main groups correspond roughly to the Renaissance, Baroque, and Enlightenment periods in art and literature. Designers in the twentieth and twenty-first centuries have continued to create new typefaces based on historic characteristics.
A basic system for classifying typefaces was devised in the nineteenth century, when printers sought to identify a heritage for their own craft analogous to that of art his-tory. Humanist letterforms are closely con-nected to calligraphy and the movement of the hand. Transitional and modern typefaces are more abstract and less organic. These three main groups correspond roughly to the Renaissance, Baroque, and Enlightenment periods in art and literature. Designers in the twentieth and twenty-first centuries have continued to create new typefaces based on historic characteristics.
Aa Bb Cc Dd Ee Ff Gg Hh Ii Jj Kk Ll Mm Nn Oo Pp Qq Rr Ss Tt Uu Vv Ww Xx Yy Zz 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 ( ) { } ? ! @ & * 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9
Aa Bb Cc Dd Ee Ff Gg Hh Ii Jj Kk Ll Mm Nn Oo Pp Qq Rr Ss Tt Uu Vv Ww Xx Yy Zz 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 { } ? ! @ & *
Aa Bb Cc Dd Ee Ff Gg Hh Ii Jj Kk Ll Mm Nn Oo Pp Qq Rr Ss Tt Uu Vv Ww Xx Yy Zz 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 { ? ! @ & *
Aa Bb Cc Dd Ee Ff Gg Hh Ii Jj Kk Ll Mm Nn Oo Pp Qq Rr Ss Tt Uu Vv Ww Xx Yy Zz 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 { ? ! @ & *
dingrotesque
MaxnogGdQrRt
MaxngdQHAMBURGLIGHT CONDENSED
REGULAR CONDENSED
BOLD CONDENSED
BLACK CONDENSED
A basic system for classifying typefaces was devised in the nineteenth century, when printers sought to identify a heritage for their own craft analogous to that of art history. Humanist letterforms are closely connected to calligraphy and the movement of the hand. Transitional and modern typefaces are more abstract and less organic. These three main groups correspond roughly to the Renaissance, Baroque, and Enlightenment periods in art and literature. Designers in the twentieth and twenty-first centuries have continued to create new typefaces based on historic characteristics.
A basic system for classifying typefaces was devised in the nineteenth century, when printers sought to identify a heritage for their own craft analogous to that of art history. Humanist letterforms are closely connected to calligraphy and the movement of the hand. Transitional and modern typefaces are more abstract and less organic. These three main groups correspond roughly to the Renaissance, Baroque, and Enlightenment periods in art and literature. Designers in the twentieth and twenty-first centuries have continued to create new typefaces based on historic characteristics.
Aa Bb Cc Dd Ee Ff Gg Hh Ii Jj Kk Ll Mm Nn Oo Pp Qq Rr Ss Tt Uu Vv Ww Xx Yy Zz 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 ( ) { } ? ! @ & * 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9
Aa Bb Cc Dd Ee Ff Gg Hh Ii Jj Kk Ll Mm Nn Oo Pp Qq Rr Ss Tt Uu Vv Ww Xx Yy Zz 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 ( ) { } ? ! @ & *
Aa Bb Cc Dd Ee Ff Gg Hh Ii Jj Kk Ll Mm Nn Oo Pp Qq Rr Ss Tt Uu Vv Ww Xx Yy Zz 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 ( ) { } ? ! @ & *
Aa Bb Cc Dd Ee Ff Gg Hh Ii Jj Kk Ll Mm Nn Oo Pp Qq Rr Ss Tt Uu Vv Ww Xx Yy Zz 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 ( ) { } ? ! @ & *
dingrotesque
MaxngdQHAMBURG
font specs
MxnatQbWFGdRREGULAR
ITALIC
ITALIC
A basic system for classifying typefaces was devised
in the nineteenth century, when printers sought
to identify a heritage for their own craft analo-
gous to that of art history. Humanist letterforms
are closely connected to calligraphy and the
movement of the hand. Transitional and modern
typefaces are more abstract and less organic.
These three main groups correspond roughly to
the Renaissance, Baroque, and Enlightenment
periods in art and literature. Designers in the
twentieth and twenty-first centuries have con-
tinued to create new typefaces based on historic
characteristics.
Aa Bb Cc Dd Ee Ff Gg Hh Ii Jj Kk Ll Mm Nn Oo
Pp Qq Rr Ss Tt Uu Vv Ww Xx Yy Zz 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8
9 0 ( ) { } ? ! @ & * 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9
Aa Bb Cc Dd Ee Ff Gg Hh Ii Jj Kk Ll Mm Nn Oo Pp
Qq Rr Ss Tt Uu Vv Ww Xx Yy Zz 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0
( ) { } ? ! @ & *
Aa Bb Cc Dd Ee Ff Gg Hh Ii Jj Kk Ll Mm Nn Oo
Pp Qq Rr Ss Tt Uu Vv Ww Xx Yy Zz 1 2 3 4 5 6 7
8 9 0 ( ) { } ? ! @ & *
disturbanceserif
MxnaopQrRtfgREGULAR
A basic system for classifying typefaces was devised in the nineteenth century, when printers sought to identify a heritage for their own craft analogous to that of art history. Humanist letterforms are closely connected to calligraphy and the move-ment of the hand. Transitional and modern typefaces are more abstract and less or-ganic. These three main groups correspond roughly to the Renaissance, Baroque, and Enlightenment periods in art and literature. Designers in the twentieth and twenty-first centuries have continued to create new typefaces based on historic characteristics.
Aa Bb Cc Dd Ee Ff Gg Hh Ii Jj Kk Ll Mm Nn Oo Pp Qq Rr Ss Tt Uu Vv Ww Xx Yy Zz 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 ( ) { } ? ! @ & *Idunt aliquam adignim velit utat. Etuer accum dunt ad magniam, ven-diat lam verostrud essi tetum illa facipisl utet endre feu faccum dit praessi. Ing ea feuguer aessenim atisi.Delessi. Sectet, sit, ver si.Alit ipit esequis exer adigna adignit aliquat lam dunt utpat aut nisisi.Tate conse nim adionsecte feuis etum dolobore molore verit veniss
fette frakturblack letter
MxnaopQrRtfg
font specs
MxnaopQrRtfGgREGULAR
FRACTIONS
UNICASE
A basic system for classifying typefaces was devised in the nineteenth century, when printers sought to identify a heritage for their own craft analogous to that of art history. Humanist letterforms are closely connected to calligraphy and the movement of the hand. Transitional and modern typefaces are more abstract and less organic. These three main groups correspond roughly to the Renaissance, Baroque, and Enlightenment periods in art and literature. Designers in the twentieth and twenty-first centuries have continued to create new typefaces based on historic characteristics.
A basic system for classifying typefaces was devised in the nine-teenth century, when printers sought to identify a heritage for their own craft analogous to that of art history. Humanist letter-forms are closely connected to calligraphy and the movement of the hand. Transitional and mod-ern typefaces are more abstract and less organic. These three main groups correspond roughly to the Renaissance, Baroque, and Enlightenment periods in art and literature. Designers in the twentieth and twenty-first cen-turies have continued to create new typefaces based on historic characteristics.
Aa Bb Cc Dd Ee Ff Gg Hh Ii Jj Kk Ll Mm Nn Oo Pp Qq Rr Ss Tt Uu Vv Ww Xx Yy Zz 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 ( ) { } ? ! @ & *
Aa Bb Cc Dd Ee Ff Gg Hh Ii Jj Kk Ll Mm Nn Oo Pp Qq Rr Ss Tt Uu Vv Ww Xx Yy Zz 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 ( ) { } ? ! @ & *
Aa Bb Cc Dd Ee Ff Gg Hh Ii Jj Kk Ll Mm Nn Oo Pp Qq Rr Ss Tt Uu Vv Ww Xx Yy Zz 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 ( ) { } ? ! @ & *
filosofiamodern
MaxodQRtfGgBOOK
DEMI
HEAVY
CONDENSED
A basic system for classifying typefaces was devised in the nineteenth century, when printers sought to identify a heritage for their own craft analogous to that of art history. Humanist letterforms are closely connected to calligraphy and the move-ment of the hand. Transitional and modern typefaces are more abstract and less or-ganic. These three main groups correspond roughly to the Renaissance, Baroque, and Enlightenment periods in art and literature. Designers in the twentieth and twenty-first centuries have continued to create new typefaces based on historic characteristics.
A basic system for classifying type-faces was devised in the nineteenth century, when printers sought to iden-tify a heritage for their own craft anal-ogous to that of art history. Humanist letterforms are closely connected to calligraphy and the movement of the hand. Transitional and modern typefaces are more abstract and less organic. These three main groups cor-respond roughly to the Renaissance, Baroque, and Enlightenment periods in art and literature. Designers in the twentieth and twenty-first centuries have continued to create new typefac-es based on historic characteristics.
Aa Bb Cc Dd Ee Ff Gg Hh Ii Jj Kk Ll Mm Nn Oo Pp Qq Rr Ss Tt Uu Vv Ww Xx Yy Zz 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 ( ) { } ? ! @ & *
Aa Bb Cc Dd Ee Ff Gg Hh Ii Jj Kk Ll Mm Nn Oo Pp Qq Rr Ss Tt Uu Vv Ww Xx Yy Zz 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 ( ) { } ? ! @ & *
Aa Bb Cc Dd Ee Ff Gg Hh Ii Jj Kk Ll Mm Nn Oo Pp Qq Rr Ss Tt Uu Vv Ww Xx Yy Zz 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 ( ) { } ? ! @ & *
Aa Bb Cc Dd Ee Ff Gg Hh Ii Jj Kk Ll Mm Nn Oo Pp Qq Rr Ss Tt Uu Vv Ww Xx Yy Zz 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 ( ) { } ? ! @ & *
franklin gothicgrotesque
font specs
MaxodQRtfGgCONDENSED
REGULAR
BOLD
ULTRA BLACK
A basic system for classifying typefaces was devised in the nineteenth century, when printers sought to identify a heritage for their own craft analogous to that of art history. Humanist letter-forms are closely connected to callig-raphy and the movement of the hand. Transitional and modern typefaces are more abstract and less organic. These three main groups correspond roughly to the Renaissance, Baroque, and Enlightenment periods in art and literature. Designers in the twentieth and twenty-first centuries have contin-ued to create new typefaces based on historic characteristics.
A basic system for classifying typefaces was devised in the nineteenth century, when printers sought to identify a heritage for their own craft analo-gous to that of art history. Humanist letterforms are closely connected to calligraphy and the movement of the hand. Transitional and modern typefac-es are more abstract and less organic. These three main groups correspond roughly to the Renaissance, Baroque, and Enlightenment periods in art and literature. Designers in the twentieth and twenty-first centuries have contin-ued to create new typefaces based on historic characteristics.
Aa Bb Cc Dd Ee Ff Gg Hh Ii Jj Kk Ll Mm Nn Oo Pp Qq Rr Ss Tt Uu Vv Ww Xx Yy Zz 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 ( ) { } ? ! @ & *
Aa Bb Cc Dd Ee Ff Gg Hh Ii Jj Kk Ll Mm Nn Oo Pp Qq Rr Ss Tt Uu Vv Ww Xx Yy Zz 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 ( ) { } ? ! @ & *
Aa Bb Cc Dd Ee Ff Gg Hh Ii Jj Kk Ll Mm Nn Oo Pp Qq Rr Ss Tt Uu Vv Ww Xx Yy Zz 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 ( ) { } ? ! @ & *
Aa Bb Cc Dd Ee Ff Gg Hh Ii Jj Kk Ll Mm Nn Oo Pp Qq Rr Ss Tt Uu Vv Ww Xx Yy Zz 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 ( ) { } ? ! @ & *
frutiger humanist sans
MxaopQRstGgBOOK
BOLD
EXTRA BOLD
A basic system for classifying typefaces was devised in the nineteenth century, when printers sought to identify a heritage for their own craft analogous to that of art history. Humanist letterforms are closely connected to calligraphy and the movement of the hand. Transitional and modern typefaces are more abstract and less organic. These three main groups correspond roughly to the Renaissance, Baroque, and Enlightenment periods in art and literature. Designers in the twentieth and twenty-first centuries have continued to create new typefaces based on historic characteristics.
A basic system for classifying typefaces was devised in the nineteenth century, when printers sought to identify a heritage for their own craft analogous to that of art history. Humanist letterforms are closely connected to calligraphy and the movement of the hand. Transitional and modern typefaces are more abstract and less organic. These three main groups corre-spond roughly to the Renaissance, Baroque, and Enlightenment peri-ods in art and literature. Designers in the twentieth and twenty-first centuries have continued to create new typefaces based on historic characteristics.
Aa Bb Cc Dd Ee Ff Gg Hh Ii Jj Kk Ll Mm Nn Oo Pp Qq Rr Ss Tt Uu Vv Ww Xx Yy Zz 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 ( ) { } ? ! @ & *
Aa Bb Cc Dd Ee Ff Gg Hh Ii Jj Kk Ll Mm Nn Oo Pp Qq Rr Ss Tt Uu Vv Ww Xx Yy Zz 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 ( ) { } ? ! @ & *
Aa Bb Cc Dd Ee Ff Gg Hh Ii Jj Kk Ll Mm Nn Oo Pp Qq Rr Ss Tt Uu Vv Ww Xx Yy Zz 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 ( ) { } ? ! @ & *
futura geometric sans
font specs
gothammodern
MaxnbyogGQRtREGULAR
ITALIC
BOLD
A basic system for classifying typefaces was devised in the nineteenth century, when printers sought to identify a heritage for their own craft analogous to that of art history. Humanist letterforms are closely connected to calligraphy and the movement of the hand. Transitional and modern typefaces are more abstract and less organic. These three main groups correspond roughly to the Renais-sance, Baroque, and Enlightenment periods in art and literature. Designers in the twentieth and twenty-first centuries have continued to create new typefaces based on historic characteristics.
A basic system for classifying type-faces was devised in the nineteenth century, when printers sought to identify a heritage for their own craft analogous to that of art histo-ry. Humanist letterforms are closely connected to calligraphy and the movement of the hand. Transitional and modern typefaces are more ab-stract and less organic. These three main groups correspond roughly to the Renaissance, Baroque, and Enlightenment periods in art and literature. Designers in the twenti-eth and twenty-first centuries have continued to create new typefaces based on historic characteristics.
Aa Bb Cc Dd Ee Ff Gg Hh Ii Jj Kk Ll Mm Nn Oo Pp Qq Rr Ss Tt Uu Vv Ww Xx Yy Zz 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 ( ) { } ? ! @ & *
Aa Bb Cc Dd Ee Ff Gg Hh Ii Jj Kk Ll Mm Nn Oo Pp Qq Rr Ss Tt Uu Vv Ww Xx Yy Zz 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 ( ) { } ? ! & *
Aa Bb Cc Dd Ee Ff Gg Hh Ii Jj Kk Ll Mm Nn Oo Pp Qq Rr Ss Tt Uu Vv Ww Xx Yy Zz 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 ( ) { } ? ! @ & *
gothamhumanist sans
MayogGdQRtBOOK
BOLD
ITALIC
LIGHT
A basic system for classifying type-
faces was devised in the nineteenth
century, when printers sought to
identify a heritage for their own
craft analogous to that of art history.
Humanist letterforms are closely con-
nected to calligraphy and the move-
ment of the hand. Transitional and
modern typefaces are more abstract
and less organic. These three main
groups correspond roughly to the
Renaissance, Baroque, and Enlight-
enment periods in art and litera-
ture. Designers in the twentieth and
twenty-first centuries have continued
to create new typefaces based on
historic characteristics.
A basic system for classifying type-
faces was devised in the nineteenth
century, when printers sought to
identify a heritage for their own
craft analogous to that of art history.
Humanist letterforms are closely
connected to calligraphy and the
movement of the hand. Transitional
and modern typefaces are more ab-
stract and less organic. These three
main groups correspond roughly
to the Renaissance, Baroque, and
Enlightenment periods in art and
literature. Designers in the twenti-
eth and twenty-first centuries have
continued to create new typefaces
based on historic characteristics.
Aa Bb Cc Dd Ee Ff Gg Hh Ii Jj Kk Ll Mm Nn Oo Pp Qq Rr Ss Tt Uu Vv Ww Xx Yy Zz 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 ( ) { } ? ! @ & *
Aa Bb Cc Dd Ee Ff Gg Hh Ii Jj Kk Ll Mm Nn Oo Pp Qq Rr Ss Tt Uu Vv Ww Xx Yy Zz 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 ( ) { } ? ! @ & *
Aa Bb Cc Dd Ee Ff Gg Hh Ii Jj Kk Ll Mm Nn Oo Pp Qq Rr Ss Tt Uu Vv Ww Xx Yy Zz 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 ( ) { } ? ! @ & *
Aa Bb Cc Dd Ee Ff Gg Hh Ii Jj Kk Ll Mm Nn Oo Pp Qq Rr Ss Tt Uu Vv Ww Xx Yy Zz 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 ( ) { } ? ! @ & *
MayogGdQRt
font specs
MaoygGdQrRtREGULAR
CONDENSED
BLACK EXTENDED
A basic system for classifying typefaces was devised in the nineteenth century, when printers sought to identify a heritage for their own craft analogous to that of art history. Humanist letterforms are closely connected to calligraphy and the movement of the hand. Transitional and modern typefaces are more abstract and less organic. These three main groups correspond roughly to the Renaissance, Baroque, and Enlightenment periods in art and literature. Designers in the twentieth and twenty-first centuries have continued to create new typefaces based on historic characteristics.
A basic system for classifying typefaces was devised in the nineteenth century, when printers sought to identify a heritage for their own craft analogous to that of art history. Humanist letterforms are closely connected to calligraphy and the movement of the hand. Transitional and modern typefaces are more abstract and less organic. These three main groups correspond roughly to the Renais-sance, Baroque, and Enlightenment periods in art and literature. Designers in the twenti-eth and twenty-first centuries have continued to create new typefaces based on historic characteristics.
Aa Bb Cc Dd Ee Ff Gg Hh Ii Jj Kk Ll Mm Nn Oo Pp Qq Rr Ss Tt Uu Vv Ww Xx Yy Zz 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 ( ) { } ? ! @ & *
Aa Bb Cc Dd Ee Ff Gg Hh Ii Jj Kk Ll Mm Nn Oo Pp Qq Rr Ss Tt Uu Vv Ww Xx Yy Zz 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 ( ) { } ? ! @ & *
Aa Bb Cc Dd Ee Ff Gg Hh Ii Jj Kk Ll Mm Nn Oo Pp Qq Rr Ss Tt Uu Vv Ww Xx Yy Zz 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 ( ) { } ? ! @ & *
Aa Bb Cc Dd Ee Ff Gg Hh Ii Jj Kk Ll Mm Nn Oo Pp Qq Rr Ss Tt Uu Vv Ww Xx Yy Zz 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 ( ) { } ? ! @ & *
THIN
helveticagrotesque
MaoygGdQrRtREGULAR
BOLD
BLACK
BOLD CONDENSED
A basic system for classifying typefaces
was devised in the nineteenth century,
when printers sought to identify a
heritage for their own craft analogous to
that of art history. Humanist letterforms
are closely connected to calligraphy
and the movement of the hand. Transi-
tional and modern typefaces are more
abstract and less organic. These three
main groups correspond roughly to the
Renaissance, Baroque, and Enlighten-
ment periods in art and literature. De-
signers in the twentieth and twenty-first
centuries have continued to create new
typefaces based on historic character-
istics.
A basic system for classifying typefac-
es was devised in the nineteenth cen-
tury, when printers sought to identify
a heritage for their own craft analo-
gous to that of art history. Humanist
letterforms are closely connected to
calligraphy and the movement of the
hand. Transitional and modern typefac-
es are more abstract and less organic.
These three main groups correspond
roughly to the Renaissance, Baroque,
and Enlightenment periods in art and
literature. Designers in the twentieth
and twenty-first centuries have contin-
ued to create new typefaces based on
historic characteristics.
Aa Bb Cc Dd Ee Ff Gg Hh Ii Jj Kk Ll Mm Nn Oo Pp Qq Rr Ss Tt Uu Vv Ww Xx Yy Zz 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 ( ) { } ? ! @ & *
Aa Bb Cc Dd Ee Ff Gg Hh Ii Jj Kk Ll Mm Nn Oo Pp Qq Rr Ss Tt Uu Vv Ww Xx Yy Zz 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 ( ) { } ? ! @ & *
Aa Bb Cc Dd Ee Ff Gg Hh Ii Jj Kk Ll Mm Nn Oo Pp Qq Rr Ss Tt Uu Vv Ww Xx Yy Zz 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 ( ) { } ? ! @ & *
Aa Bb Cc Dd Ee Ff Gg Hh Ii Jj Kk Ll Mm Nn Oo Pp Qq Rr Ss Tt Uu Vv Ww Xx Yy Zz 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 ( ) { } ? ! @ & *
interstategrotesque
MaoygGdQrRt
font specs
xyogGdQrRstREGULAR
Aa Bb Cc Dd Ee Ff Gg Hh Ii Jj Kk Ll Mm Nn Oo Pp Qq Rr Ss Tt Uu Vv Ww Xx Yy Zz 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 ( ) { } ? ! @ & *
Pat. San ea consectet ad duis dolorem eu facil dit am, summy nisim ipit, quat, velit pratismodo diat.Et lorperi liquat lor sequam zzrilit, velese facin ut verosti nciduis modit, qui erosto odit ut verit nos nos amet iure doluptatisl digna facin hendre ming ea feum incilla ad dunt dunt ipit vulput lor-per sumsand ionsenit num ip erit la feu feumsan henis exerci esto etumsan hent am, velit, quisit nummy nosto dolutat irit veniam zzrilit, qui tincilit wis eum zzriustis ex eraestrud delit lamcon vero exercidunt aliscidui bla facip et veniam eum illan veros dignit alit vullandiat nis nisl dunt aliquam consent alit etuero odionsecte dunt nulla faci et in vulla feugait lore eum zzril ullamco nsequi bla autpatet nummodipisi.Ed etummodit vullamcon utat ulluptat delendit nonsenim in-ciliqui tio odoloreet ver sum velis aliquis del irit aut nosto conse-quam zzrit aut ipsum diamcon sequam num et wisi tio dolorem elesto dolobor iuscilisci et, quis endre te dolobor sum volenibh exerit utpat. Uptat, vel dolese molorem eraessis nit niamcorperos autat, venit in etum erilissit irit eui bla feum iurem nonsequi e
kunstler scriptscript
MayogGdQrRtREGULAR
ITALIC
BOLD
A basic system for classifying typefaces was devised in the nineteenth century, when printers sought to identify a heri-tage for their own craft analogous to that of art history. Humanist letterforms are closely connected to calligraphy and the movement of the hand. Transitional and modern typefaces are more abstract and less organic. These three main groups correspond roughly to the Renaissance, Baroque, and Enlightenment periods in art and literature. Designers in the twen-tieth and twenty-first centuries have continued to create new typefaces based on historic characteristics.
A basic system for classifying typefaces was devised in the nineteenth century, when printers sought to identify a heritage for their own craft analogous to that of art history. Humanist letterforms are closely connected to calligraphy and the movement of the hand. Transi-tional and modern typefaces are more abstract and less organic. These three main groups correspond roughly to the Renaissance, Baroque, and Enlighten-ment periods in art and literature. De-signers in the twentieth and twenty-first centuries have continued to create new typefaces based on historic character-istics.
Aa Bb Cc Dd Ee Ff Gg Hh Ii Jj Kk Ll Mm Nn Oo Pp Qq Rr Ss Tt Uu Vv Ww Xx Yy Zz 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 ( ) { } ? ! @ & *
Aa Bb Cc Dd Ee Ff Gg Hh Ii Jj Kk Ll Mm Nn Oo Pp Qq Rr Ss Tt Uu Vv Ww Xx Yy Zz 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 ( ) { } ? ! @ & *
Aa Bb Cc Dd Ee Ff Gg Hh Ii Jj Kk Ll Mm Nn Oo Pp Qq Rr Ss Tt Uu Vv Ww Xx Yy Zz 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 ( ) { } ? ! @ & *
meliortransitional
MayogGdQrRt
font specs
MxagGdQrRtLIGHT
MEDIUM
EXTRA BOLD
A basic system for classifying typefaces was devised in the nineteenth century, when printers sought to identify a heri-tage for their own craft analogous to that of art history. Humanist letterforms are closely connected to calligraphy and the movement of the hand. Transitional and modern typefaces are more abstract and less organic. These three main groups correspond roughly to the Renaissance, Baroque, and Enlightenment periods in art and literature. Designers in the twentieth and twenty-first centuries have continued to create new typefaces based on historic characteristics.
A basic system for classifying typefac-es was devised in the nineteenth cen-tury, when printers sought to identify a heritage for their own craft analogous to that of art history. Humanist letter-forms are closely connected to callig-raphy and the movement of the hand. Transitional and modern typefaces are more abstract and less organic. These three main groups correspond roughly to the Renaissance, Baroque, and En-lightenment periods in art and litera-ture. Designers in the twentieth and twenty-first centuries have continued to create new typefaces based on historic characteristics.
Aa Bb Cc Dd Ee Ff Gg Hh Ii Jj Kk Ll Mm Nn Oo Pp Qq Rr Ss Tt Uu Vv Ww Xx Yy Zz 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 ( ) { } ? ! @ & *
Aa Bb Cc Dd Ee Ff Gg Hh Ii Jj Kk Ll Mm Nn Oo Pp Qq Rr Ss Tt Uu Vv Ww Xx Yy Zz 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 ( ) { } ? ! @ & *
Aa Bb Cc Dd Ee Ff Gg Hh Ii Jj Kk Ll Mm Nn Oo Pp Qq Rr Ss Tt Uu Vv Ww Xx Yy Zz 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 ( ) { } ? ! @ & *
memphisslab serif
REGULAR
CAPS
BLACK
ITALIC
A basic system for classifying typefaces was devised in the nineteenth century, when printers sought to identify a heritage for their own craft analogous to that of art his-tory. Humanist letterforms are closely con-nected to calligraphy and the movement of the hand. Transitional and modern typefac-es are more abstract and less organic. These three main groups correspond roughly to the Renaissance, Baroque, and Enlighten-ment periods in art and literature. Designers in the twentieth and twenty-first centuries have continued to create new typefaces based on historic characteristics.
A basic system for classifying typefaces was devised in the nineteenth century, when printers sought to identify a heri-tage for their own craft analogous to that of art history. Humanist letterforms are closely connected to calligraphy and the movement of the hand. Transitional and modern typefaces are more abstract and less organic. These three main groups correspond roughly to the Renaissance, Baroque, and Enlightenment periods in art and literature. Designers in the twentieth and twenty-first centuries have continued to create new typefaces based on historic characteristics.
Aa Bb Cc Dd Ee Ff Gg Hh Ii Jj Kk Ll Mm Nn Oo Pp Qq Rr Ss Tt Uu Vv Ww Xx Yy Zz 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 ( ) { } ? ! @ & *
Aa Bb Cc Dd Ee Ff Gg Hh Ii Jj Kk Ll Mm Nn Oo Pp Qq Rr Ss Tt Uu Vv Ww Xx Yy Zz 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 ( ) { } ? ! @ & *
Aa Bb Cc Dd Ee Ff Gg Hh Ii Jj Kk Ll Mm Nn Oo Pp Qq Rr Ss Tt Uu Vv Ww Xx Yy Zz 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 ( ) { } ? ! @ & *
Aa Bb Cc Dd Ee Ff Gg Hh Ii Jj Kk Ll Mm Nn Oo Pp Qq Rr Ss Tt Uu Vv Ww Xx Yy Zz 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 ( ) { } ? ! @ & *
MaxogGdQrRst
metahumanist serif
MaxogGdQrRst
font specs
MaxogGdQrRstREGULAR
ITALIC
BOLD
FRACTIONS
A basic system for classifying typefaces was
devised in the nineteenth century, when print-
ers sought to identify a heritage for their own
craft analogous to that of art history. Humanist
letterforms are closely connected to calligraphy
and the movement of the hand. Transitional
and modern typefaces are more abstract and less
organic. These three main groups correspond
roughly to the Renaissance, Baroque, and
Enlightenment periods in art and literature.
Designers in the twentieth and twenty-first cen-
turies have continued to create new typefaces
based on historic characteristics.
A basic system for classifying typefaces was devised in the
nineteenth century, when printers sought to identify a heritage
for their own craft analogous to that of art history. Humanist
letterforms are closely connected to calligraphy and the move-
ment of the hand. Transitional and modern typefaces are more
abstract and less organic. These three main groups correspond
roughly to the Renaissance, Baroque, and Enlightenment
periods in art and literature. Designers in the twentieth and
twenty-first centuries have continued to create new typefaces
based on historic characteristics.
Aa Bb Cc Dd Ee Ff Gg Hh Ii Jj Kk Ll Mm Nn Oo Pp Qq Rr Ss Tt Uu Vv Ww Xx Yy Zz 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 ( ) { } ? ! @ & * 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9
Aa Bb Cc Dd Ee Ff Gg Hh Ii Jj Kk Ll Mm Nn Oo Pp Qq Rr Ss Tt Uu Vv Ww Xx Yy Zz 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 ( ) { } ? ! @ & *
Aa Bb Cc Dd Ee Ff Gg Hh Ii Jj Kk Ll Mm Nn Oo Pp Qq Rr Ss Tt Uu Vv Ww Xx Yy Zz 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 ( ) { } ? ! @ & *
Aa Bb Cc Dd Ee Ff Gg Hh Ii Jj Kk Ll Mm Nn Oo Pp Qq Rr Ss Tt Uu Vv Ww Xx Yy Zz 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 ( ) { } ? ! @ & *
mrs eavesold style
REGULAR
ITALIC
BOLD
A basic system for classifying typefaces was devised in the nineteenth century, when print-ers sought to identify a heritage for their own craft analogous to that of art history. Humanist letterforms are closely connected to calligraphy and the movement of the hand. Transitional and modern typefaces are more abstract and less organic. These three main groups correspond roughly to the Renaissance, Baroque, and Enlightenment periods in art and literature. Designers in the twentieth and twenty-first centuries have continued to create new typefaces based on historic characteristics.
A basic system for classifying typefaces was devised in the nineteenth century, when print-ers sought to identify a heritage for their own craft analogous to that of art history. Humanist letterforms are closely connected to calligraphy and the movement of the hand. Transitional and modern typefaces are more abstract and less organic. These three main groups correspond roughly to the Renaissance, Baroque, and Enlightenment periods in art and literature. Designers in the twentieth and twenty-first centuries have continued to create new typefaces based on historic characteristics.
Aa Bb Cc Dd Ee Ff Gg Hh Ii Jj Kk Ll Mm Nn Oo Pp Qq Rr Ss Tt Uu Vv Ww Xx Yy Zz 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 ( ) { } ? ! @ & * 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9
Aa Bb Cc Dd Ee Ff Gg Hh Ii Jj Kk Ll Mm Nn Oo Pp Qq Rr Ss Tt Uu Vv Ww Xx Yy Zz 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 ( ) { } ? ! @ & *
Aa Bb Cc Dd Ee Ff Gg Hh Ii Jj Kk Ll Mm Nn Oo Pp Qq Rr Ss Tt Uu Vv Ww Xx Yy Zz 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 ( ) { } ? ! @ & *
news gothicgrotesque
MaxogGdQrRst
MaxogGdQrRst MaopQRfGgREGULAR
A basic system for clas-
sifying typefaces was
devised in the nineteenth
century, when printers
sought to identify a heri-
tage for their own craft
analogous to that of art
history. Humanist let-
terforms are closely con-
nected to calligraphy and
the movement of the hand.
Transitional and modern
typefaces are more histor-
ic characteristics.
Aa Bb Cc Dd Ee Ff Gg Hh Ii Jj Kk Ll Mm Nn Oo Pp Qq Rr Ss Tt Uu Vv Ww Xx Yy Zz 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 ( ) { } ? ! @ & *
font specs
ocr ageometric sans
MxaopQRstGgBOOK
ITALIC
BOLD
A basic system for classifying typefaces was devised in the nineteenth century, when printers sought to identify a heritage for their own craft analogous to that of art history. Humanist letterforms are closely connected to calligraphy and the movement of the hand. Transitional and modern typefaces are more abstract and less organic. These three main groups correspond roughly to the Renaissance, Baroque, and Enlightenment periods in art and literature. Designers in the twentieth and twenty-first centuries have continued to create new typefaces based on historic characteristics.
A basic system for classifying typefaces was devised in the nineteenth century, when printers sought to identify a heritage for their own craft analogous to that of art history. Humanist letterforms are closely connected to calligraphy and the movement of the hand. Transitional and modern typefaces are more abstract and less organic. These three main groups correspond roughly to the Renaissance, Baroque, and Enlightenment periods in art and literature. Designers in the twentieth and twenty-first centuries have continued to create new typefaces based on historic characteristics.
Aa Bb Cc Dd Ee Ff Gg Hh Ii Jj Kk Ll Mm Nn Oo Pp Qq Rr Ss Tt Uu Vv Ww Xx Yy Zz 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 ( ) { } ? ! @ & *
Aa Bb Cc Dd Ee Ff Gg Hh Ii Jj Kk Ll Mm Nn Oo Pp Qq Rr Ss Tt Uu Vv Ww Xx Yy Zz 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 ( ) { } ? ! @ & *
Aa Bb Cc Dd Ee Ff Gg Hh Ii Jj Kk Ll Mm Nn Oo Pp Qq Rr Ss Tt Uu Vv Ww Xx Yy Zz 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 ( ) { } ? ! @ & *
optima humanist sans
font specs
MxaopQRstGgLIGHT
OLD STYLE
REGULAR
BOLD
A basic system for classifying typefaces was devised in the nineteenth century, when printers sought to identify a heri-tage for their own craft analogous to that of art history. Humanist letterforms are closely connected to calligraphy and the movement of the hand. Transitional and modern typefaces are more abstract and less organic. These three main groups correspond roughly to the Renaissance, Baroque, and Enlightenment periods in art and literature. Designers in the twentieth and twenty-first centuries have continued to create new typefaces based on historic characteristics.
A basic system for classifying typefaces was devised in the nineteenth century, when printers sought to identify a heri-tage for their own craft analogous to that of art history. Humanist letterforms are closely connected to calligraphy and the movement of the hand. Transitional and modern typefaces are more abstract and less organic. These three main groups correspond roughly to the Renaissance, Baroque, and Enlightenment periods in art and literature. Designers in the twentieth and twenty-first centuries have continued to create new typefaces based on historic characteristics.
Aa Bb Cc Dd Ee Ff Gg Hh Ii Jj Kk Ll Mm Nn Oo Pp Qq Rr Ss Tt Uu Vv Ww Xx Yy Zz 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 ( ) { } ? ! @ & *
Aa Bb Cc Dd Ee Ff Gg Hh Ii Jj Kk Ll Mm Nn Oo Pp Qq Rr Ss Tt Uu Vv Ww Xx Yy Zz 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 ( ) { } ? ! @ & *
Aa Bb Cc Dd Ee Ff Gg Hh Ii Jj Kk Ll Mm Nn Oo Pp Qq Rr Ss Tt Uu Vv Ww Xx Yy Zz 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 ( ) { } ? ! @ & *
Aa Bb Cc Dd Ee Ff Gg Hh Ii Jj Kk Ll Mm Nn Oo Pp Qq Rr Ss Tt Uu Vv Ww Xx Yy Zz 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 ( ) { } ? ! @ & *
palatinoold style
MxaopQRstGgqREGULAR
ITALIC
BOLD
A basic system for classifying typefaces was devised in the nineteenth century, when printers sought to identify a heritage for their own craft analogous to that of art history. Humanist letterforms are closely connected to calligraphy and the move-ment of the hand. Transitional and modern typefaces are more abstract and less or-ganic. These three main groups correspond roughly to the Renaissance, Baroque, and Enlightenment periods in art and literature. Designers in the twentieth and twenty-first centuries have continued to create new typefaces based on historic characteristics.
A basic system for classifying typefaces was devised in
the nineteenth century, when printers sought to identify
a heritage for their own craft analogous to that of art
history. Humanist letterforms are closely connected to cal-
ligraphy and the movement of the hand. Transitional and
modern typefaces are more abstract and less organic. These
three main groups correspond roughly to the Renaissance,
Baroque, and Enlightenment periods in art and literature.
Designers in the twentieth and twenty-first centuries
have continued to create new typefaces based on historic
characteristics.
Aa Bb Cc Dd Ee Ff Gg Hh Ii Jj Kk Ll Mm Nn Oo Pp Qq Rr Ss Tt Uu Vv Ww Xx Yy Zz 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 ( ) { } ? ! @ & *
Aa Bb Cc Dd Ee Ff Gg Hh Ii Jj Kk Ll Mm Nn Oo Pp Qq Rr Ss Tt Uu Vv Ww Xx Yy Zz 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 ( ) { } ? ! @ & *
Aa Bb Cc Dd Ee Ff Gg Hh Ii Jj Kk Ll Mm Nn Oo Pp Qq Rr Ss Tt Uu Vv Ww Xx Yy Zz 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 ( ) { } ? ! @ & *
perpetuatransitional
font specs
MaxbyogGQrRtTHIN
REGULAR
HEAVY
A basic system for classifying typefaces
was devised in the nineteenth century,
when printers sought to identify a heri-
tage for their own craft analogous to
that of art history. Humanist letter-
forms are closely connected to cal-
ligraphy and the movement of the hand.
Transitional and modern typefaces are
more abstract and less organic. These
three main groups correspond roughly to
the Renaissance, Baroque, and Enlight-
enment periods in art and literature.
Designers in the twentieth and twenty-
first centuries have continued to create
new typefaces based on historic charac-
teristics.
A basic system for classifying typefaces
was devised in the nineteenth century,
when printers sought to identify a heri-
tage for their own craft analogous to
that of art history. Humanist letter-
forms are closely connected to cal-
ligraphy and the movement of the hand.
Transitional and modern typefaces are
more abstract and less organic. These
three main groups correspond roughly to
the Renaissance, Baroque, and Enlight-
enment periods in art and literature.
Designers in the twentieth and twenty-
first centuries have continued to create
new typefaces based on historic charac-
teristics.
Aa Bb Cc Dd Ee Ff Gg Hh Ii Jj Kk Ll
Mm Nn Oo Pp Qq Rr Ss Tt Uu Vv Ww Xx
Yy Zz 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 ( ) { }
? ! @ & *
Aa Bb Cc Dd Ee Ff Gg Hh Ii Jj Kk Ll
Mm Nn Oo Pp Qq Rr Ss Tt Uu Vv Ww Xx
Yy Zz 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 ( ) { }
? ! & *
Aa Bb Cc Dd Ee Ff Gg Hh Ii Jj Kk Ll
Mm Nn Oo Pp Qq Rr Ss Tt Uu Vv Ww Xx
Yy Zz 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 ( ) { }
? ! @ & *
plateletgeometric sans
MxanopdrRtSfGgREGULAR
ALTERNATE
BOLD
A basic system for classifying typefaces was
devised in the nineteenth century, when
printers sought to identify a heritage for
their own craft analogous to that of art
history. Humanist letterforms are closely
connected to calligraphy and the move-
ment of the hand. Transitional and modern
typefaces are more abstract and less or-
ganic. These three main groups correspond
roughly to the Renaissance, Baroque, and
Enlightenment periods in art and literature.
Designers in the twentieth and twenty-first
centuries have continued to create new
typefaces based on historic characteristics.
A basic system for classifying typefaces was devised
in the nineteenth century, when printers sought to
identify a heritage for their own craft analogous to
that of art history. Humanist letterforms are closely
connected to calligraphy and the movement of the
hand. Transitional and modern typefaces are more
abstract and less organic. These three main groups
correspond roughly to the Renaissance, Baroque, and
Enlightenment periods in art and literature. Design-
ers in the twentieth and twenty-first centuries have
continued to create new typefaces based on historic
characteristics.
Aa Bb Cc Dd Ee Ff Gg Hh Ii Jj Kk Ll Mm Nn Oo Pp Qq Rr Ss Tt Uu Vv Ww Xx Yy Zz 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 ( ) { } ? ! @ & *
Aa Bb Cc Dd Ee Ff Gg Hh Ii Jj Kk Ll Mm Nn Oo Pp Qq Rr Ss Tt Uu Vv Ww Xx Yy Zz 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 ( ) { } ? ! @ & *
Aa Bb Cc Dd Ee Ff Gg Hh Ii Jj Kk Ll Mm Nn Oo Pp Qq Rr Ss Tt Uu Vv Ww Xx Yy Zz 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 ( ) { } ? ! @ & *
priori sanshumanist sans
font specs
MxanodQrRtSfgREGULAR
ALTERNATE
BOLD
A basic system for classifying typefaces was
devised in the nineteenth century, when
printers sought to identify a heritage for
their own craft analogous to that of art
history. Humanist letterforms are closely
connected to calligraphy and the move-
ment of the hand. Transitional and modern
typefaces are more abstract and less or-
ganic. These three main groups correspond
roughly to the Renaissance, Baroque, and
Enlightenment periods in art and literature.
Designers in the twentieth and twenty-first
centuries have continued to create new
typefaces based on historic characteristics.
A basic system for classifying typefaces was de-
vised in the nineteenth century, when printers
sought to identify a heritage for their own craft
analogous to that of art history. Humanist let-
terforms are closely connected to calligraphy
and the movement of the hand. Transitional and
modern typefaces are more abstract and less
organic. These three main groups correspond
roughly to the Renaissance, Baroque, and
Enlightenment periods in art and literature.
Designers in the twentieth and twenty-first
centuries have continued to create new type-
faces based on historic characteristics.
Aa Bb Cc Dd Ee Ff Gg Hh Ii Jj Kk Ll Mm Nn Oo Pp Qq Rr Ss Tt Uu Vv Ww Xx Yy Zz 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 ( ) { } ? ! @ & *
Aa Bb Cc Dd Ee Ff Gg Hh Ii Jj Kk Ll Mm Nn Oo Pp Qq Rr Ss Tt Uu Vv Ww Xx Yy Zz 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 ( ) { } ? ! @ & *
Aa Bb Cc Dd Ee Ff Gg Hh Ii Jj Kk Ll Mm Nn Oo Pp Qq Rr Ss Tt Uu Vv Ww Xx Yy Zz 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 ( ) { } ? ! @ & *
priori seriftransitional
MxanopQrRtGg(55) SANS
ITALIC
SERIF
ITALIC
A basic system for classifying typefaces was devised in the nineteenth century, when printers sought to identify a heritage for their own craft analogous to that of art history. Humanist letterforms are closely connected to calligraphy and the movement of the hand. Transitional and modern typefaces are more abstract and less organic. These three main groups correspond roughly to the Renais-sance, Baroque, and Enlightenment periods in art and literature. Designers in the twentieth and twenty-first centuries have continued to create new typefaces based on historic characteristics.
A basic system for classifying typefaces was devised in the nineteenth century, when printers sought to identify a heritage for their own craft analogous to that of art his-tory. Humanist letterforms are closely con-nected to calligraphy and the movement of the hand. Transitional and modern typefaces are more abstract and less organic. These three main groups correspond roughly to the Renaissance, Baroque, and Enlightenment periods in art and literature. Designers in the twentieth and twenty-first centuries have continued to create new typefaces based on historic characteristics.
Aa Bb Cc Dd Ee Ff Gg Hh Ii Jj Kk Ll Mm Nn Oo Pp Qq Rr Ss Tt Uu Vv Ww Xx Yy Zz 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 ( ) { } ? ! @ & *
Aa Bb Cc Dd Ee Ff Gg Hh Ii Jj Kk Ll Mm Nn Oo Pp Qq Rr Ss Tt Uu Vv Ww Xx Yy Zz 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 ( ) { } ? ! @ & *
Aa Bb Cc Dd Ee Ff Gg Hh Ii Jj Kk Ll Mm Nn Oo Pp Qq Rr Ss Tt Uu Vv Ww Xx Yy Zz 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 ( ) { } ? ! @ & *
Aa Bb Cc Dd Ee Ff Gg Hh Ii Jj Kk Ll Mm Nn Oo Pp Qq Rr Ss Tt Uu Vv Ww Xx Yy Zz 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 ( ) { } ? ! @ & *
rotis humanist sans
font specs
MxayogGQfRREGULAR
SMALL CAPS
BOLD
BOLD ITALIC
A basic system for classifying typefaces was devised in the nineteenth century, when printers sought to identify a heritage for their own craft analogous to that of art history. Humanist letterforms are closely connected to calligraphy and the move-ment of the hand. Transitional and modern typefaces are more abstract and less or-ganic. These three main groups correspond roughly to the Renaissance, Baroque, and Enlightenment periods in art and literature. Designers in the twentieth and twenty-first centuries have continued to create new typefaces based on historic characteristics.
A basic system for classifying typefaces was devised in the nineteenth century, when printers sought to identify a heritage for their own craft analogous to that of art history. Humanist letterforms are closely connected to calligraphy and the move-ment of the hand. Transitional and modern typefaces are more abstract and less or-ganic. These three main groups correspond roughly to the Renaissance, Baroque, and Enlightenment periods in art and literature. Designers in the twentieth and twenty-first centuries have continued to create new typefaces based on historic characteristics.
Aa Bb Cc Dd Ee Ff Gg Hh Ii Jj Kk Ll Mm Nn Oo Pp Qq Rr Ss Tt Uu Vv Ww Xx Yy Zz 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 ( ) { } ? ! @ & *
Aa Bb Cc Dd Ee Ff Gg Hh Ii Jj Kk Ll Mm Nn Oo Pp Qq Rr Ss Tt Uu Vv Ww Xx Yy Zz 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 ( ) { } ? ! & *
Aa Bb Cc Dd Ee Ff Gg Hh Ii Jj Kk Ll Mm Nn Oo Pp Qq Rr Ss Tt Uu Vv Ww Xx Yy Zz 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 ( ) { } ? ! @ & *
Aa Bb Cc Dd Ee Ff Gg Hh Ii Jj Kk Ll Mm Nn Oo Pp Qq Rr Ss Tt Uu Vv Ww Xx Yy Zz 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 ( ) { } ? ! @ & *
sabonold style
MxabyogGdQrRREGULAR
CAPS
ITALIC
BOLD
A basic system for classifying typefaces was
devised in the nineteenth century, when
printers sought to identify a heritage for their
own craft analogous to that of art history.
Humanist letterforms are closely connected
to calligraphy and the movement of the
hand. Transitional and modern typefaces
are more abstract and less organic. These
three main groups correspond roughly to the
Renaissance, Baroque, and Enlightenment
periods in art and literature. Designers in
the twentieth and twenty-first centuries have
continued to create new typefaces based on
historic characteristics.
A basic system for classifying typefaces was
devised in the nineteenth century, when
printers sought to identify a heritage for their
own craft analogous to that of art history.
Humanist letterforms are closely connected
to calligraphy and the movement of the
hand. Transitional and modern typefaces
are more abstract and less organic. These
three main groups correspond roughly to the
Renaissance, Baroque, and Enlightenment
periods in art and literature. Designers in
the twentieth and twenty-first centuries have
continued to create new typefaces based on
historic characteristics.
Aa Bb Cc Dd Ee Ff Gg Hh Ii Jj Kk Ll Mm Nn Oo Pp Qq Rr Ss Tt Uu Vv Ww Xx Yy Zz 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 ( ) { } ? ! @ & *
Aa Bb Cc Dd Ee Ff Gg Hh Ii Jj Kk Ll Mm Nn Oo Pp Qq Rr Ss Tt Uu Vv Ww Xx Yy Zz 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 ( ) { } ? ! & *
Aa Bb Cc Dd Ee Ff Gg Hh Ii Jj Kk Ll Mm Nn Oo Pp Qq Rr Ss Tt Uu Vv Ww Xx Yy Zz 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 ( ) { } ? ! @ & *
Aa Bb Cc Dd Ee Ff Gg Hh Ii Jj Kk Ll Mm Nn Oo Pp Qq Rr Ss Tt Uu Vv Ww Xx Yy Zz 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 ( ) { } ? ! @ & *
scala sanshumanist sans
font specs
MxaoygGdQRREGULAR
ITALIC
BOLD
BLACK
A basic system for classifying typefaces
was devised in the nineteenth cen-
tury, when printers sought to identify
a heritage for their own craft analo-
gous to that of art history. Humanist
letterforms are closely connected to
calligraphy and the movement of the
hand. Transitional and modern typefac-
es are more abstract and less organic.
These three main groups correspond
roughly to the Renaissance, Baroque,
and Enlightenment periods in art and
literature. Designers in the twentieth
and twenty-first centuries have contin-
ued to create new typefaces based on
historic characteristics.
A basic system for classifying type-faces was devised in the nineteenth century, when printers sought to identify a heritage for their own craft analogous to that of art histo-ry. Humanist letterforms are closely connected to calligraphy and the movement of the hand. Transitional and modern typefaces are more ab-stract and less organic. These three main groups correspond roughly to the Renaissance, Baroque, and Enlightenment periods in art and literature. Designers in the twenti-eth and twenty-first centuries have continued to create new typefaces based on historic characteristics.
Aa Bb Cc Dd Ee Ff Gg Hh Ii Jj Kk Ll Mm Nn Oo Pp Qq Rr Ss Tt Uu Vv Ww Xx Yy Zz 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 ( ) { } ? ! @ & *
Aa Bb Cc Dd Ee Ff Gg Hh Ii Jj Kk Ll Mm Nn Oo Pp Qq Rr Ss Tt Uu Vv Ww Xx Yy Zz 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 ( ) { } ? ! @ & *
Aa Bb Cc Dd Ee Ff Gg Hh Ii Jj Kk Ll Mm Nn Oo Pp Qq Rr Ss Tt Uu Vv Ww Xx Yy Zz 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 ( ) { } ? ! @ & *
Aa Bb Cc Dd Ee Ff Gg Hh Ii Jj Kk Ll Mm Nn Oo Pp Qq Rr Ss Tt Uu Vv Ww Xx Yy Zz 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 ( ) { } ? ! @ & *
serifaslab serif
axogbGdQrRstREGULAR
Aa Bb Cc Dd Ee Ff Gg Hh Ii Jj Kk Ll Mm Nn Oo Pp Qq Rr Ss Tt Uu Vv Ww Xx Yy Zz 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 ( ) { } ? ! @ & *
Dolessecte ver sim er aut wismod mincilit loboreet praessed tat. Iquis eu feuis dolore faci ercil eriurer sisi tet, quamconse do odolor amcommodit vulla feugait luptatisl dolorer augait praessi. Lut vel iri-uscil et luptat. Nullandre magna feugiam, quis aute conullu ptatincip ea alit wis et volore dip et, cortin henisi. Quis autet, veros accum ipit vel ute mod ting eumsandreet am, qui te faciniat nummod eu feugiat ex essim vent vendre tat venibh et pratuer ipsum volortio eniat praessed mincilit dolobortie tat. Lam dolut amcommy nos eraessed tin ulput ut vulputat, quat, volobor incip et essi.orper sum quamconsed magniam, quisit accum voloborem alit iuscipit la consequam dit nulput acing eu feum quat. Ut luptat at.
snell roundhandscript
font specs
MxaoygGdQrRBOLD CONDENSED
REGULAR
ITALIC
BOLD
A basic system for classifying typefaces
was devised in the nineteenth century,
when printers sought to identify a heri-
tage for their own craft analogous to that
of art history. Humanist letterforms are
closely connected to calligraphy and the
movement of the hand. Transitional and
modern typefaces are more abstract and
less organic. These three main groups cor-
respond roughly to the Renaissance, Ba-
roque, and Enlightenment periods in art
and literature. Designers in the twentieth
and twenty-first centuries have continued
to create new typefaces based on historic
characteristics.
A basic system for classifying typefaces was
devised in the nineteenth century, when
printers sought to identify a heritage for their
own craft analogous to that of art history.
Humanist letterforms are closely connected to
calligraphy and the movement of the hand.
Transitional and modern typefaces are more
abstract and less organic. These three main
groups correspond roughly to the Renaissance,
Baroque, and Enlightenment periods in art
and literature. Designers in the twentieth and
twenty-first centuries have continued to create
new typefaces based on historic characteristics.
Aa Bb Cc Dd Ee Ff Gg Hh Ii Jj Kk Ll Mm Nn Oo Pp Qq Rr Ss Tt Uu Vv Ww Xx Yy Zz 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 ( ) { } ? ! @ & *
Aa Bb Cc Dd Ee Ff Gg Hh Ii Jj Kk Ll Mm Nn Oo Pp Qq Rr Ss Tt Uu Vv Ww Xx Yy Zz 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 ( ) { } ? ! @ & *
Aa Bb Cc Dd Ee Ff Gg Hh Ii Jj Kk Ll Mm Nn Oo Pp Qq Rr Ss Tt Uu Vv Ww Xx Yy Zz 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 ( ) { } ? ! @ & *
Aa Bb Cc Dd Ee Ff Gg Hh Ii Jj Kk Ll Mm Nn Oo Pp Qq Rr Ss Tt Uu Vv Ww Xx Yy Zz 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 ( ) { } ? ! @ & *
swiftnew transitional
REGULAR
BOLD
BLACK
A basic system for classifying typefaces was devised in the nineteenth century, when printers sought to identify a heritage for their own craft analogous to that of art history. Humanist letterforms are closely connected to calligraphy and the move-ment of the hand. Transitional and modern typefaces are more abstract and less or-ganic. These three main groups correspond roughly to the Renaissance, Baroque, and Enlightenment periods in art and literature. Designers in the twentieth and twenty-first centuries have continued to create new typefaces based on historic characteristics.
A basic system for classifying typefaces was devised in the nineteenth century, when printers sought to identify a heritage for their own craft analogous to that of art history. Humanist letterforms are closely connected to calligraphy and the move-ment of the hand. Transitional and modern typefaces are more abstract and less or-ganic. These three main groups correspond roughly to the Renaissance, Baroque, and Enlightenment periods in art and literature. Designers in the twentieth and twenty-first centuries have continued to create new typefaces based on historic characteristics.
Aa Bb Cc Dd Ee Ff Gg Hh Ii Jj Kk Ll Mm Nn Oo Pp Qq Rr Ss Tt Uu Vv Ww Xx Yy Zz 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 ( ) { } ? ! @ & *
Aa Bb Cc Dd Ee Ff Gg Hh Ii Jj Kk Ll Mm Nn Oo Pp Qq Rr Ss Tt Uu Vv Ww Xx Yy Zz 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 ( ) { } ? ! @ & *
Aa Bb Cc Dd Ee Ff Gg Hh Ii Jj Kk Ll Mm Nn Oo Pp Qq Rr Ss Tt Uu Vv Ww Xx Yy Zz 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 ( ) { } ? ! @ & *
syntaxhumanist sans
MxaoygGdQrR
MxaoygGdQrR
font specs
MxanyogGdQrRCONDENSED
MEDIUM
BOLD
BOLD NO.2
A basic system for classifying typefaces was devised in the nineteenth century, when printers sought to identify a heritage for their own craft analogous to that of art history. Humanist letterforms are closely connected to calligraphy and the movement of the hand. Transitional and modern typefaces are more abstract and less organic. These three main groups correspond roughly to the Renaissance, Baroque, and Enlightenment periods in art and literature. Designers in the twentieth and twenty-first centuries have continued to create new typefaces based on historic characteristics.
A basic system for classifying typefaces was devised in the nineteenth century, when printers sought to identify a heritage for their own craft analogous to that of art history. Humanist letterforms are closely connected to calligraphy and the movement of the hand. Transitional and modern typefaces are more abstract and less organic. These three main groups correspond roughly to the Renaissance, Baroque, and Enlightenment periods in art and literature. Designers in the twentieth and twenty-first centuries have continued to create new typefaces based on historic characteristics.
Aa Bb Cc Dd Ee Ff Gg Hh Ii Jj Kk Ll Mm Nn Oo Pp Qq Rr Ss Tt Uu Vv Ww Xx Yy Zz 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 ( ) { } ? ! @ & *
Aa Bb Cc Dd Ee Ff Gg Hh Ii Jj Kk Ll Mm Nn Oo Pp Qq Rr Ss Tt Uu Vv Ww Xx Yy Zz 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 ( ) { } ? ! @ & *
Aa Bb Cc Dd Ee Ff Gg Hh Ii Jj Kk Ll Mm Nn Oo Pp Qq Rr Ss Tt Uu Vv Ww Xx Yy Zz 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 ( ) { } ? ! @ & *
Aa Bb Cc Dd Ee Ff Gg Hh Ii Jj Kk Ll Mm Nn Oo Pp Qq Rr Ss Tt Uu Vv Ww Xx Yy Zz 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 ( ) { } ? ! @ & *
trade gothichumanist sans
MxyagGdQrRREGULAR
ITALIC
SMALL CAPS
BOLD
A basic system for classifying typefaces was devised in the nineteenth century, when printers sought to identify a heritage for their own craft analogous to that of art history. Humanist letter-forms are closely connected to callig-raphy and the movement of the hand. Transitional and modern typefaces are more abstract and less organic. These three main groups correspond roughly to the Renaissance, Baroque, and Enlightenment periods in art and literature. Designers in the twentieth and twenty-first centuries have contin-ued to create new typefaces based on historic characteristics.
A basic system for classifying type-faces was devised in the nineteenth century, when printers sought to identify a heritage for their own craft analogous to that of art history. Humanist letterforms are closely connected to calligraphy and the movement of the hand. Transitional and modern typefaces are more ab-stract and less organic. These three main groups correspond roughly to the Renaissance, Baroque, and Enlightenment periods in art and literature. Designers in the twentieth and twenty-first centuries have con-tinued to create new typefaces based on historic characteristics.
Aa Bb Cc Dd Ee Ff Gg Hh Ii Jj Kk Ll Mm Nn Oo Pp Qq Rr Ss Tt Uu Vv Ww Xx Yy Zz 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 ( ) { } ? ! @ & *
Aa Bb Cc Dd Ee Ff Gg Hh Ii Jj Kk Ll Mm Nn Oo Pp Qq Rr Ss Tt Uu Vv Ww Xx Yy Zz 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 ( ) { } ? ! @ & *
Aa Bb Cc Dd Ee Ff Gg Hh Ii Jj Kk Ll Mm Nn Oo Pp Qq Rr Ss Tt Uu Vv Ww Xx Yy Zz 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 ( ) { } ? ! @ & *
Aa Bb Cc Dd Ee Ff Gg Hh Ii Jj Kk Ll Mm Nn Oo Pp Qq Rr Ss Tt Uu Vv Ww Xx Yy Zz 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 ( ) { } ? ! @ & *
walbaummodern
MxyagGdQrR
font specs
MyogGdQrRREGULAR
MEDIUM
MEDIUM ITALIC
BOLD
A basic system for classifying type-faces was devised in the nineteenth century, when printers sought to identify a heritage for their own craft analogous to that of art history. Humanist letterforms are closely connected to calligraphy and the movement of the hand. Transitional and modern typefaces are more ab-stract and less organic. These three main groups correspond roughly to the Renaissance, Baroque, and Enlightenment periods in art and literature. Designers in the twentieth and twenty-first centuries have con-tinued to create new typefaces based on historic characteristics.
A basic system for classifying type-faces was devised in the nineteenth century, when printers sought to identify a heritage for their own craft analogous to that of art histo-ry. Humanist letterforms are close-ly connected to calligraphy and the movement of the hand. Transitional and modern typefaces are more ab-stract and less organic. These three main groups correspond roughly to the Renaissance, Baroque, and Enlightenment periods in art and literature. Designers in the twenti-eth and twenty-first centuries have continued to create new typefaces based on historic characteristics.
Aa Bb Cc Dd Ee Ff Gg Hh Ii Jj Kk Ll Mm Nn Oo Pp Qq Rr Ss Tt Uu Vv Ww Xx Yy Zz 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 ( ) { } ? ! @ & *
Aa Bb Cc Dd Ee Ff Gg Hh Ii Jj Kk Ll Mm Nn Oo Pp Qq Rr Ss Tt Uu Vv Ww Xx Yy Zz 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 ( ) { } ? ! @ & *
Aa Bb Cc Dd Ee Ff Gg Hh Ii Jj Kk Ll Mm Nn Oo Pp Qq Rr Ss Tt Uu Vv Ww Xx Yy Zz 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 ( ) { } ? ! @ & *
Aa Bb Cc Dd Ee Ff Gg Hh Ii Jj Kk Ll Mm Nn Oo Pp Qq Rr Ss Tt Uu Vv Ww Xx Yy Zz 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 ( ) { } ? ! @ & *
voltanew transitional
9/12
TYPOGRAPHY 02ali fisher
university of kansasspring 2012professor selby
Text for the book was compiled from the following sources: Elements of Ty-pographic Style by Robert Bringhurst, Getting it Right with Type: the Do’s and Don’ts of Typography by Victoria Square, Mac is Not A Typewriter by Robin Williams. This book is not to be sold to the public and to only be used by the designer for their reference and student design portfolio.
XxhgTYPOGRAPHY AND YOU
184