Type I and II Ground Disturbing Categorical Exclusion ...

1

Type I and II Ground Disturbing Categorical Exclusion Action Classification Form

STIP Project No. B-4479

WBS Element 38384.1.FD2

Federal Project No. BRZ-1700(17)

A. Project Description:

The proposed project involves the replacement of Bridge Numbers 222, 226, 228 and 230 carrying SR 1700 (Red Hill Road) over Red Hill Swamp, in Columbus County. The project is included in the 2016-2025 North Carolina State Transportation Improvement Program (STIP). The project location is shown in Figure 1 in Appendix A. Photos of the site are shown in Figures 2 and 3 in Appendix A. Functional design plans are included in Appendix A as Figures 4 – 6. Right of way acquisition and construction for the project are scheduled to begin in federal fiscal years 2018 and 2019, respectively, in the draft 2017-2027 STIP.

B. Description of Need and Purpose: The purpose of the proposed project is to replace four obsolete bridges. Bridge Nos. 222, 226, 228, and 230 are all structurally deficient and functionally obsolete. The table below presents information regarding the existing bridges.

Bridge No. 222 226 228 230

Crosses Red Hill Swamp

Red Hill Swamp

Red Hill Swamp

Red Hill Swamp

Year Built 1947 1949 1949 1949

Clear Roadway Width 24 feet 24 feet 24 feet 24 feet

Length 70 feet 74 feet 74 feet 56 feet

Sufficiency Rating 22.47 24.6 25.36 25.36

Functionally Obsolete?

Yes (Structural

Appraisal=3)

Yes (Structural

Appraisal=4)

Yes (Structural

Appraisal=4)

Yes (Structural

Appraisal=2)

Structurally Deficient?

Yes (Substructure Condition=3)




Posted Weight Limit 22 tons SV 32 tons TTST

16 tons SV 24 tons TTST



2

C. Categorical Exclusion Action Classification: (Check one)

☒ TYPE I

☐ TYPE II

D. Proposed Improvements 28. Bridge rehabilitation, reconstruction, or replacement or the construction of grade

separation to replace existing at-grade railroad crossings, if the actions meet the constraints in 23 CFR 771.117(e)(1-6).

E. Special Project Information:

A vicinity map showing the location of the four bridges and the detour route is included in Appendix A as Figure 1. Photographs of the bridges are included in Appendix A as Figures 2 and 3. NCDOT has sought input from the following agencies as a part of the project development: U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, NC Department of Natural Resources, U.S. Fish & Wildlife Service, N.C Wildlife Resources Commission, NC Division of Water Quality, and the Environmental Protection Agency. No special concerns were expressed by any of the agencies contacted. Estimated Costs: The estimated costs, based on 2017 prices, are as follows: R/W: $ 37,000.00 Const: $3,100,000.00 Utilities: $ 0.00 Total: $3,137,000.00 Estimated Traffic: Year 2012 450 vehicles per day (vpd) Year 2035 900 vpd Accidents: Eleven crashes occurred in the vicinity of the project during a recent three-year period. None were associated with the geometry of the bridge or its approach roadways. Design Exceptions: There are no anticipated design exceptions for this project. Proposed Bridge Length: The proposed bridge lengths for Bridge Nos. 222, 226, and 228 is 90 feet. The proposed bridge length for Bridge No. 230 is 75 feet. The clear roadway width on each bridge will be 30 feet 10 inches. Pedestrian and Bicycle Accommodations: SR 1700 is not a designated bicycle route, nor does it have any pedestrian accommodations. Offsite Detour: Bridge Nos. 222, 226, 228, and 230 will be replaced on the existing alignment. Traffic will be detoured offsite (see Figure 1) during the construction period. NCDOT Guidelines for Evaluation of Offsite Detours for Bridge Replacement Projects considers multiple project variables beginning with the additional time traveled by the average road user resulting from the offsite detour. The offsite detour for this project would include SR 1700, SR 1701, SR 1702, SR 1758, NC 211, and US 701 Business. The majority of traffic on the road is through traffic. The detour for the average road user would

3

result in 15 minutes additional travel time (nine miles additional travel). Up to a 24-month construction duration is expected for this project. Public Involvement: A landowner notification letter and a newsletter were sent to all property owners affected directly by this project. Property owners were invited to comment. No comments have been received to date. Northern long-eared bat (NLEB): The US Fish and Wildlife Service has developed a programmatic biological opinion (PBO) in conjunction with the Federal Highway Administration, the US Army Corps of Engineers and NCDOT, for the NLEB in eastern North Carolina. The PBO covers the entire NCDOT program in Divisions 1-8, including all NCDOT projects and activities. The programmatic determination for NLEB for the NCDOT program in Divisions 1-8 is “May Affect, Likely to Adversely Affect.” The PBO will provide incidental take coverage for NLEB and will ensure compliance with Section 7 of the Endangered Species Act for five years for all NCDOT projects with a federal nexus in Divisions 1-8, which includes Columbus County.

4

F. Project Impact Criteria Checklists:

Type I & II - Ground Disturbing Actions

FHWA APPROVAL ACTIVITIES THRESHOLD CRITERIA

If any of questions 1-7 are marked “yes” then the CE will require FHWA approval. Yes No

1 Does the project require formal consultation with U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (USFWS) or National Marine Fisheries Service (NMFS)? ☐ ☒

2 Does the project result in impacts subject to the conditions of the Bald and Golden Eagle Protection Act (BGPA)? ☐ ☒

3 Does the project generate substantial controversy or public opposition, for any reason, following appropriate public involvement? ☐ ☒

4 Does the project cause disproportionately high and adverse impacts relative to low-income and/or minority populations? ☐ ☒

5 Does the project involve a residential or commercial displacement, or a substantial amount of right of way acquisition? ☐ ☒

6 Does the project require an Individual Section 4(f) approval? ☐ ☒

7

Does the project include adverse effects that cannot be resolved with a Memorandum of Agreement (MOA) under Section 106 of the National Historic Preservation Act (NHPA) or have an adverse effect on a National Historic Landmark (NHL)?

☐ ☒

If any of questions 8 through 31 are marked “yes” then additional information will be required for those questions in Section G.

Other Considerations Yes No

8 Does the project result in a finding of “may affect not likely to adversely affect” for listed species, or designated critical habitat under Section 7 of the Endangered Species Act (ESA)?

☒ ☐

9 Is the project located in anadromous fish spawning waters? ☐ ☒

10

Does the project impact waters classified as Outstanding Resource Water

(ORW), High Quality Water (HQW), Water Supply Watershed Critical Areas, 303(d) listed impaired water bodies, buffer rules, or Submerged

Aquatic Vegetation (SAV)?

☐ ☒

11 Does the project impact waters of the United States in any of the designated mountain trout streams?

☐ ☒

12 Does the project require a U.S. Army Corps of Engineers (USACE) Individual Section 404 Permit?

☒ ☐

13 Will the project require an easement from a Federal Energy Regulatory Commission (FERC) licensed facility?

☐ ☒

14 Does the project include a Section 106 of the NHPA effects determination other than a no effect, including archaeological remains? ☐ ☒

5

Other Considerations (continued) Yes No

15 Does the project involve hazardous materials and/or landfills? ☐ ☒

16

Does the project require work encroaching and adversely affecting a regulatory floodway or work affecting the base floodplain (100-year flood) elevations of a water course or lake, pursuant to Executive Order 11988 and 23 CFR 650 subpart A?

☒ ☐

17 Is the project in a Coastal Area Management Act (CAMA) county and substantially affects the coastal zone and/or any Area of Environmental Concern (AEC)?

☐ ☒

18 Does the project require a U.S. Coast Guard (USCG) permit? ☐ ☒

19 Does the project involve construction activities in, across, or adjacent to a designated Wild and Scenic River present within the project area? ☐ ☒

20 Does the project involve Coastal Barrier Resources Act (CBRA) resources? ☐ ☒

21 Does the project impact federal lands (e.g. U.S. Forest Service (USFS), USFWS, etc.) or Tribal Lands? ☐ ☒

22 Does the project involve any changes in access control? ☐ ☒

23 Does the project have a permanent adverse effect on local traffic patterns or community cohesiveness? ☐ ☒

24 Will maintenance of traffic cause substantial disruption? ☐ ☒

25 Is the project inconsistent with the STIP or the Metropolitan Planning Organization’s (MPO’s) Transportation Improvement Program (TIP) (where applicable)?

☐ ☒

26

Does the project require the acquisition of lands under the protection of Section 6(f) of the Land and Water Conservation Act, the Federal Aid in Fish Restoration Act, the Federal Aid in Wildlife Restoration Act, Tennessee Valley Authority (TVA), or other unique areas or special lands that were acquired in fee or easement with public-use money and have deed restrictions or covenants on the property?

☐ ☒

27 Does the project involve Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) buyout properties under the Hazard Mitigation Grant Program (HMGP)? ☐ ☒

28 Does the project include a de minimis or programmatic Section 4(f)? ☐ ☒

29 Is the project considered a Type I under the NCDOT's Noise Policy? ☐ ☒

30 Is there prime or important farmland soil impacted by this project as defined by the Farmland Protection Policy Act (FPPA)? ☐ ☒

31 Are there other issues that arose during the project development process that affected the project decision? ☐ ☒

G. Additional Documentation as Required from Section F

Response to Question 8: Wood Stork: There is habitat for the wood stork within the study area. The species was not observed during field investigations performed on March 17, 2015 (an additional survey will be conducted during the revised US Fish and Wildlife Service survey window of April 15, 2017 to July 15, 2017). A review of the NCNHP records on May 20, 2015 indicates no occurrences within one mile of the study area. Biological Conclusion: May Affect - Not Likely to Adversely Effect

6

Response to Question 12:

Anticipated Permits: The proposed project will affect 4.06 acres of wetlands based on an area of 20 feet outside of the slope stakes. A Nationwide permit (NWP) 23 (33 CFR 330.5(a) 23)) may be applicable for impacts to “Waters of the United States” resulting from this project. Other permits that may apply include a NWP 33 for temporary construction activities such as stream dewatering, work bridges, or temporary causeways may be required during bridge construction. However, it is possible that an Individual Section 404 Permit could be required. The US Army Corps of Engineers holds the final discretion as to what permit will be required to authorize project construction. The corresponding Section 401 Water Quality Certification(s) (WQC) from the NCDWR will also be needed.

Response to Question 16: Columbus County is a participant in the National Flood Insurance Program, administered by the Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA). Based on the most current information available from the NC Floodplain Mapping Program (FMP), these stream crossings are in a designated flood hazard zone. The proposed bridge replacements will provide equivalent or greater conveyance than that of the existing bridges. The Hydraulics Unit will coordinate with the FMP, the delegated state agency administering FEMA’s National Flood Insurance Program, to determine the status of the project with regard to applicability of NCDOT’S Memorandum of Agreement with FMP, or approval of a Conditional Letter of Map Revision (CLOMR) and subsequent final Letter of Map Revision (LOMR). This project involves construction activities on or adjacent to a FEMA-regulated stream. Therefore, the Division shall submit sealed as-built construction plans to the Hydraulics Unit upon completion of project construction, certifying the drainage structures and roadway embankment located within the 100-year floodplain were built as shown in the construction plans, both horizontally and vertically.

7

H. Project Commitments

Columbus County Bridge Numbers 222, 226, 228 and 230

Carrying SR 1700 (Red Hill Road) over Red Hill Swamp Federal-Aid Project BRZ-1700(17)

WBS No. 38384.1.FD2 STIP Project B-4479

Division Six Construction, Resident Engineer’s Office Columbus County Emergency Services will be contacted at (910) 640-3049 at least one month prior to road closure to make the necessary temporary reassignments to primary response units. Columbus County Schools will be contacted at (910) 642-2586 at least one month prior to road closure to allow temporary rerouting of school buses. This project involves construction activities on or adjacent to a FEMA-regulated stream. Therefore, the Division shall submit sealed as-built construction plans to the Hydraulics Unit upon completion of project construction, certifying the drainage structures and roadway embankment located within the 100-year floodplain were built as shown in the construction plans, both horizontally and vertically. Hydraulics Unit The Hydraulics Unit will coordinate with the Floodplain Mapping Program, the delegated state agency administering FEMA’s National Flood Insurance Program, to determine the status of the project with regard to applicability of NCDOT’S Memorandum of Agreement with FMP, or approval of a Conditional Letter of Map Revision (CLOMR) and subsequent final Letter of Map Revision (LOMR). Natural Environment Section An additional survey for the federally-listed wood stork will be conducted during the revised US Fish and Wildlife Service survey window of April 15, 2017 to July 15, 2017.

8

I. Categorical Exclusion Approval

STIP Project No. B-4479

WBS Element 38384.1.FD2

Federal Project No. BRZ-1700(17)

Prepared By:

Date Stephen C. Greene, P.E., Vice President Ramey Kemp & Associates, Inc. Prepared For: Joseph H. Miller, PE, Project Planning Engineer Project Development and Environmental Analysis Unit North Carolina Department of Transportation Reviewed By:

Date James McInnis, Jr., PE, Project Engineer Project Development and Environmental Analysis Unit North Carolina Department of Transportation

☒ Approved If all of the threshold questions (1 through 7) of Section F are answered “no,” NCDOT approves this Categorical Exclusion.

☐ Certified If any of the threshold questions (1 through 7) of Section F are answered “yes,” NCDOT certifies this Categorical Exclusion.

Date James McInnis, Jr., PE, Project Engineer North Carolina Department of Transportation FHWA Approved: For Projects Certified by NCDOT (above), FHWA signature

required. N/A

Date John F. Sullivan, III, PE, Division Administrator Federal Highway Administration

5/18/2017

5/18/2017

5/18/2017

APPENDIX A

Rico

Mt. Zion

Ch.

Bra

nch

Mable

Spaulding Rd.

Gre

ene

Rd.

Red

Hill

Rd.

Red

Hill

Rd.

Sessio

nRd.

Tart

Rd.

Charle

yLennon

Rd.

Jenkins

Rd.

Jenkins

Rd.

Hallsboro

Rd.

Hallsboro

Rd.Rico

Rd.

Rico Rd.

CreedSt.

Rehobeth C

hurc

h R

d.

1702

1702

1720

1720

1702

17021702

1542

1543

1700

1700

1700

1701

1700

1544

1723

1723

1721

1001

1001 1724

1741

1722

1722

1720

1762

Red

Hill

Swamp

701BUS

701BYP

701

.10

.17

.05

.05

1.48

701

1.13College

St.

Green

St.

RAILROAD

Sch.

New Jerusalem

Church

1757

1001

1758

1759

1710

1167

1168

1190

1166

1166

1168

1166

1001

1755

1710

Rd.

Page

Ford

Rd.

Brid

gers

Rd.

Page

Rd.

Burney

Bluefield

Page

Rd.

Tart Rd.

Lanier

Rd.

Baldwin-Elkins

Rd.

Rico

Rd.

Halls

boro

Rd.

Porterville

Quill

Perimeter

Rd.

W.

Peach

St.

David

St.

Calla

han MHP

Rd.

S.S

mith

St.

N.

Cox

St.

Hester

St.

Gooden

St.

Melvin

St.

N.Page

Rd.

Elm

St.

Shurm

ac

St.

W.S.Railroad

St.

Graham

St.

Elm

St.

N.

CurrieSt.

Mitc

hell-

Ford

Rd.

E.

Robert

St.

Sin

gletary

Rd.

E.GrahamSt.

W.

E.

Currie St.

Virginia

Ave.

Church

St.

Ca

mpbell

St.

Gro

ve

St.

Clark

St.

6th

St.

Elm

hurst

St.

Edge

wood

St.

McKoy

State

nRd.

Little John

Rd.

George

W.

Kelly

Rd.

1.4

.63

.37

.14

.07

.61

1.3

.9

Elkton

Elkton

Slades

Swamp

70BYP

70BUS

BAY

RAVEN

Clarkton

Pop. 796

211

FIGURE 1Not to Scale

Bridge Location

Columbus Co.

N

LOCATION MAP

PROJECT

TIP NO. B-4479

OF TRANSPO

RT

ATIO

N

ANI

LO

R

AC

HTRONFOE

T

AT

S

DE

PA

RT

ME

NT

Detour Route

Bridge No. 222

Bridge No. 226

Bridge No. 228

Bridge No. 230

Columbus County

over Red Hill Swamp

on SR 1700 (Red Hill Road)

Bridge Nos. 222, 226, 228 and 230

-B

L- 2

-B

L- 1

T

TT

T

HH

T

MARKER

FOMARKERFO

MARKER

FOMARKERFO

72 str

200 pr300 pr

72 str

300 pr

200 pr

100 pr

72 str

200 pr

200 pr

48 str

50 pr 300 pr

50 pr

Century Link

Century Link

50 pr

WOODS

WOODS

INV=66.84’

INV=68.13’

INV=68.94’

INV=72.43’

18"

RCP

18" RCP

BRG 222

WW

7’ CONC

WW

7’ CONC

WW

7’ CONCWW

7’ CONC

TO BALDWIN RD.

TO ANDREW JACKSON H

WY W 74/76

SR 1700 (RED HILL RD)

18’ BSTSR 1701 (GREEN ELKINS RD)

10’ S

OIL

10’ S

OIL

S 56°0

3’42" E

1146.00

’

S 88°2

6’18"

W

160.5

0’

EIP

S 56°03’42" E23.24’

ETHERIDGE, JR

JEFF D.

DB 642 PG 636

LEONARD B. WHITE

DB 436 PG 134

LEONARD B. WHITE

DB 430 PG 587

ELKINS, JR

EDISON JULIUS

DB 577 PG 607

EDISON JULIUS ELKINS, JR

DB 577 PG 607 LEVY HOWARD JONES

DB 887 PG 804

PB 71 PG 47

RONALD ERWIN WHITE

DB 1084 PG 112

EXIST R/W

EXIST R/W

EXIST R/W

EXIST R/W

EXIST R/W

EXIST R/W

ASS

UM

ED E

XIS

T

R/

W

ASS

UM

ED E

XIS

T

R/

W

ROADWAY TYPICAL SECTION

BRIDGE TYPICAL SECTION

30’-10"

11’ 11’

POINT

GRADE

4’-5"

1’

1"

33’ OUT-TO-OUT WIDTH11 PRESTRESSED CONC. CORED SLAB UNITS

1"

1’

4’-5"

CL-L-

FOR BRIDGE 222 OVER RED HILL SWAMP

0.04 0.04

2 3/4"

6’ 11’ 11’ 6’ 8’

9’w/GR

3:14:10.08 0.02 0.02 0.08

4:1

3:1SLOPE

VARIABLE

POINT

GRADE

FDPS

2’

FDPS

2’

CL-L-

ROADWAY TYPICAL SECTION

6’ 6’ 8’

4:10.08 0.02 0.02 0.08

4:1

3:1SLOPE

VARIABLE POINT

GRADE

CL

3:1

-Y-

-L- STA. 10+00.00 TO 50+50.00

VARIES VARIES11’ TO 15’11’ TO 15’

-Y- STA. 10+00.00 TO 13+29.15

9’w/GR

FOR -L- PROFILE, SEE SHEET NO. 7

4

FOR -Y- PROFILE, SEE SHEET NO. 8

SEE SH

EET 5

MA

TC

HLIN

E -L- STA. 24+

00.0

0

PI Sta 12+37.46

D

L = 182.05’

T = 95.27’

R = 250.00’

-L-

-Y-

PI Sta 13+24.27

L = 407.40’

T = 204.15’

R = 2,500.00’

PI Sta 22+14.08

D

L = 387.45’

T = 195.43’

R = 1,200.00’

15+00 20+00

-Y- P

C Sta. 11

+42.19

-Y- PT Sta. 13+24.24

-L-

PO

T

Sta. 10

+00.0

0

-

L-

PC Sta. 11+20.12

-

L-

PT

Sta. 15

+27.5

2

-

L-

PC Sta. 20+18.6

5

-L- P

CC Sta. 24+06.10

-Y- P

OT Sta. 10+

00.00

Runoff= 100’ Runoff = 100’

e = .04 e = .04

NAD 83/ 95

RUNOFF = 68

e = .04

D

BR 222

ELKINS ROAD

SR 1701 GREEN

.03

.04

.03

.02

.01

.00

.00

.01

.03

.04

.02

.03

.04

.03

.02

.02

.02

.02

.01

.02

.02

.02

.02

.01

.02

.02

.02

.02

.03

.04

.00

.01

.02

.03

.04

.03

.02

.01

.00.00

.01

.02

.02

.01

.02

.02

.02

.03

.04

.03

.02

11’11’

.01

.01

.02R=30’R=30’

+04.2

5

+95.7

5

11’

11’

.02

.01

.02

.02

.00.0

2

.01.0

2

.02

.02 .04

.04

25’

25’

25’

.02

.02

17’

.04.04

+62.86

+33.57

17’

(TYP.)

+94.19

+03.4

5

+01.98

.04

.04

2’ FDPS

2’ FDPS

(TYP.)

11’

11’

11’

11’

15’15’

2’ FDPS

2’ FDPS(TYP.)

-Y- STA. 10+00.00BEGIN CONSTRUCTION

(TYP.)

(TYP.)

-Y- POT STA. 13+70.56-L- POC STA. 12+50.00=

110’ TR

AN

SITIO

N

-L- STA.10+00.00BEGIN PROJECT B-4479

11’

11’

TAPER LT

&

RT

SR 1700 RED HILL ROAD

RED HILL SWAMP

BROWN MARSH SWAMP

(TYP)GRAU-350

(TYP)TYPE-III

F

F

F

C

F

C

F

CC

F

C

F

CC

F

F

F

F

F

C

C

C

F

F

C

C

F

C

F

F

F

RE

VISIO

NS

ROADWAY DESIGN

ENGINEER

R/W SHEET NO.

SHEET NO.PROJECT REFERENCE NO.

3/15/2017

...\

Proj\

B4479_

Rdy_psh04.d

gn

User: bpalis

8/17/99

INCOMPLETE PLANSDO NOT USE FOR R/W ACQUISITION

HYDRAULICS

B-4479

ENGINEER

0’ 50’ 100’50’ 25’

BRIDGE APPROACH SLAB

WITH OFFSITE DETOUR

REPLACE IN PLACE

B-4479

COLUMBUS COUNTY

DOCUMENT NOT CONSIDERED FINAL

UNLESS ALL SIGNATURES COMPLETED



RAMEY KEMP

Transportation Engineers

www.rameykemp.com

Phone: 919-872-5115

Raleigh, North Carolina 27609

5808 Faringdon Place, Suite 100

ASSOCIATES, INC.&

NC License No. C-0910

-B

L- 4

-B

L- 3

TT

MARKERFO

MARKERFO

200 pr

Century Link

Century Link

WOODS

WOODS

20’ S

OIL

WOODS

BRG 228

WW

11’ WD

WW

11’ WD

WW

7’ WD

WW

9’ WD

BRG 226

WW

9’ CONC

WW

9’ CONC

WW

9’ CONC

WW

9’ CONC

ELEV 65.51’29’ RIGHT

BL STA 11+47BM#1


17.5’ BST

HISTORIC CYPRESS TREE

DB 887 PG 804

N 26°34’0

9" E

681.0

8’

N 61°4

8’3

2" E

315

1.49’

LEVY HOWARD JONES

PB 71 PG 47

RONALD ERWIN WHITE

DB 1084 PG 112

PAEJ PROPERTIES, LLC

PB 71 PG 47

DB 1086 PG 322

IRREVOCABLE TRUST

MARY GERTRUDE EVANS

DB 538 PG 078

EXIST R/W

EXIST R/W

EXIST R/W

EXIST R/W

ROADWAY TYPICAL SECTIONBRIDGE TYPICAL SECTION

30’-10"

11’ 11’

POINT

GRADE

4’-5"

1’

1"


1"

1’

4’-5"

CL-L-

BRIDGE TYPICAL SECTION

30’-10"

11’ 11’ 4’-5"

1’

1"


1"

1’

4’-5"

CL-L-

0.02 0.02

POINT

GRADE

2 3/4" MIN

FOR BRIDGE 226 OVER RED HILL SWAMP

0.02 0.02

2 3/4"

6’ 11’ 11’ 6’ 8’

9’w/GR

3:14:10.08 0.02 0.02 0.08

4:1

3:1SLOPE

VARIABLE

POINT

GRADE

FDPS

2’

FDPS

2’

CL-L-

-L- STA. 10+00.00 TO 50+50.00FOR BRIDGE 228 OVER RED HILL SWAMP


5

SEE S

HEET 4

MA

TC

HLIN

E -L- STA. 2

4+

00.0

0

SEE S

HEET 6

MA

TC

HLIN

E -L- STA. 38+

00.0

0

5

25+0030+00 35+00

-L-

PC

C Sta. 24+06.10

-L-

PT

Sta. 26+46.10

NAD 83/ 95

PI Sta 22+14.08

D

L = 387.45’

T = 195.43’

R = 1,200.00’

PI Sta 25+26.28

D

L = 240.00’

T = 120.18’

R = 1,800.00’

-L-

e = .04

Runoff = 100’

e = .04

Runoff = 100’

.04

.03

.01

.00

.04

.03

.02

.02

.01

.02

.02

.02

.02

.02

.02

.02

+75.0

0

25’

11’

11’

.02

.02

11’

11’

(TYP.)

25’

(TYP.)

+25.0

0

2’ FDPS

2’ FDPS

2’ FDPS

2’ FDPS

.04

.04

RED HILL SWAMP

BROWN MARSH SWAMP


BR 228BR 226 (TYP)GRAU-350

(TYP)TYPE-III

(TYP)TYPE-III

(TYP)GRAU-350

DO NOT DISTURB TREE

F

F

F

F

FF

F

CC

F

F

F

FC

FC

F

F

F

F

RE

VISIO

NS

ROADWAY DESIGN

ENGINEER

R/W SHEET NO.


3/15/2017

...\

Proj\

B4479_

Rdy_psh05.d

gn

User: bpalis

8/17/99


HYDRAULICS

B-4479

ENGINEER

0’ 50’ 100’50’ 25’


WITH OFFSITE DETOUR

REPLACE IN PLACE

B-4479

COLUMBUS COUNTY





RAMEY KEMP


www.rameykemp.com

Phone: 919-872-5115



ASSOCIATES, INC.&


-B

L- 7

-B

L- 6

-B

L- 5

HH

T

MARKERFO

Century Link, 50 pr

Century Link Abandoned - Unk Size

Century Link, 150 pr

Century Link, 100 pr

50 pr

Abandoned - Unk Size

150 pr

100 pr72 str

200 pr

72 str

Century Link

Century Link

Century Link

200 pr

72 str

WOODS

WOODS

WOODS

WOODS

WW

10’ WD

WW

11’ WD WW

7’ WD

BRG 230

WW

8’ WD

TO BUS 701

17.5’ BST


MARKERFO

ELEV 67.86’40’ RIGHT

BL STA 37+41BM#2

ANGELA CAMPBELL BEAN

DB 938 PG 148

PB 19 PG 53

ROBERT DENNING WHITE

DB 1084 PG 106

PB 56 PG 61

N 46°2

7’4

4" E

881.0

6’

EIP

S 46°5

0’3

6" W

230.2

8’

N 43

°55’51" W

1278.18’

PAEJ PROPERTIES, LLC

DB 1086 PG 322

PB 71 PG 47

DB 538 PG 078

IRREVOCABLE TRUST

MARY GERTRUDE EVANS

EXIST R/W

EXIST R/W

EXIST R/W

EXIST R/W

ROADWAY TYPICAL SECTIONBRIDGE TYPICAL SECTION

30’-10"

11’ 11’ 4’-5"

1’

1"


1"

1’

4’-5"

CL-L-

0.02 0.02

POINT

GRADE

2 3/4" MIN

6’ 11’ 11’ 6’ 8’

9’w/GR

3:14:10.08 0.02 0.02 0.08

4:1

3:1SLOPE

VARIABLE

POINT

GRADE

FDPS

2’

FDPS

2’

CL-L-

-L- STA. 10+00.00 TO 50+50.00FOR BRIDGE 230 OVER RED HILL SWAMP


SEE S

HEET 5

MA

TC

HLIN

E -L- STA. 38+

00.0

0

6

-L-

40+00 45+00

50+00-L-

PC Sta. 42

+14.7

1

-L-

PT

Sta. 44+46.8

9

-L-

PC Sta. 49+01.07

-L-

PT

Sta. 50+13.8

0

NAD 83/ 95

e = NC

PI Sta 43+30.80

D

L = 232.18’

T = 116.09’

R = 11,459.16’

PI Sta 49+57.43

D

L = 112.73’

T = 56.37’

R = 11,459.16’

e = NC

BR 230

11’

11’

.02

.02

2’ FDPS

2’ FDPS

.02

.02

11’

11’


RED HILL SWAMP

BROWN MARSH SWAMP

-L- 50+50.00END PROJECT B-4479

(TYP)TYPE-III

(TYP)GRAU-350

2’ FDPS

2’ FDPSF

F

F

F

F

F

F

FF

RE

VISIO

NS

ROADWAY DESIGN

ENGINEER

R/W SHEET NO.


3/15/2017

...\

Proj\

B4479_

Rdy_psh06.d

gn

User: bpalis

8/17/99


HYDRAULICS

B-4479

ENGINEER

0’ 50’ 100’50’ 25’


WITH OFFSITE DETOUR

REPLACE IN PLACE

B-4479

COLUMBUS COUNTY





RAMEY KEMP


www.rameykemp.com

Phone: 919-872-5115



ASSOCIATES, INC.&


Type I and II Ground Disturbing Categorical Exclusion ...

Documents

Transcript of Type I and II Ground Disturbing Categorical Exclusion ...