Tw 3.2 theoretical approaches

17
Tutoring Writing 3.2 Theoretical Approaches

description

 

Transcript of Tw 3.2 theoretical approaches

Page 1: Tw 3.2 theoretical approaches

Tutoring Writing

3.2 Theoretical Approaches

Page 2: Tw 3.2 theoretical approaches

Teaching and social justice

• One premise of The Everyday Writing Center that we did not explicitly address is that social justice is one of the goals of education.

Page 3: Tw 3.2 theoretical approaches

In class writing

• What is social justice?• How does it relate to education?• Do you see your work as a teacher/writer

within the tradition of social justice?– Please write about the questions above for around

five minutes. – Then, share your answers with your group.– Then, take some notes about how your answers

compare/contrast.

Page 4: Tw 3.2 theoretical approaches

Why theory?

• What does theory have to do with the tutoring of writing?

• James Berlin Rhetoric and Reality (1987): Our worldviews and our understanding of

epistemology shape our views of writing and writing instruction.

• Consciousness of our worldviews/epistemologies reflective/informed tutoring and teaching practices.

Page 5: Tw 3.2 theoretical approaches

Current-traditional rhetoric:

• Rational view of the world.

• Objective view of knowledge.

• Descartes: I think therefore I am

Page 6: Tw 3.2 theoretical approaches

Current traditional rhetoric: Implications for writing instruction

1) Writing is view as a container for ideas.

2) Belief language errors signal errors in thinking/intelligence.

3) Teachers primarily pay much attention to surface features and errors.

Page 7: Tw 3.2 theoretical approaches

Current traditional rhetoric: Critique and questions

• It ignores writing as a process of making meaning and the transactional nature of knowledge.

• Few identify as current-traditional rhetoricians, but, much writing instruction and even more assessment are driven by this view.

• What issues does this pose for writing tutors?

Page 8: Tw 3.2 theoretical approaches

Expressivism

• Subjective view of the world.

• In the tradition of Romantic writers (Wordsworth, Emerson, Thoreau), Platonic philosophy, and cognitive psychology (Rogers, Maslow).

• Understands reality via introspection, connection with nature, and art.

Page 9: Tw 3.2 theoretical approaches

Expressivism: Implications for writing instruction

• Attention to creativity.

• Cultivation of an environment where students feel comfortable expressing themselves.

• Value authentic voice and process.

Page 10: Tw 3.2 theoretical approaches

Expressivism: critique and questions

• It fails to acknowledge the social nature of learning; it posits knowledge within the mind; it ignores the transactional nature of knowledge.

• Peter Elbow, Ken Macrorie, Donald Murray are names commonly associated with this approach, but if you read their work, you will find that the critique of expressivism oversimplifies their work. Like current-traditionalism, few writing instructors today would self-identify as “expressivists,” but, you will observe many practices that appear to fall under this heading.

Page 11: Tw 3.2 theoretical approaches

Question:

• What problems are created when assessment is driven by current traditional views and teaching practices are driven by expressivist views? – Please write about the question above for around

five minutes. – Then, share your answers with your group.– Then, take some notes about how your answers

compare/contrast.

Page 12: Tw 3.2 theoretical approaches

Social construction

• Transactional view of knowledge, which posits reality as created from interaction between people, ideas, and structures.

• Roots in social learning theories of Lev Vyotgsky and progressive education philosophy of John Dewey.

• For writing instruction, this means attention to collaboration (social learning), discourse communities (understanding language values as culturally created).

Page 13: Tw 3.2 theoretical approaches

Cultural Studies

• An extension of multicultural approaches to education. Writing and rhetoric are part of civic education that prepares students for participation in public life.

• For writing teachers, this means attention to critical thinking and public discourse.

• The critique- unnecessarily politicizes the classroom and takes attention from writing (Maxine Hairston 1992, Stanley Fish NYTimes)

Page 14: Tw 3.2 theoretical approaches

Postmodern

• A departure from the modernist project that values multiplicity and ambiguity. (Jean Francois Lyotard, James Berlin, Sandra Harding)

• Critique- too much jargon, too confusing, fails to provide stable ground for action (Fredric Jameson, Nancy Welch).

Page 15: Tw 3.2 theoretical approaches

Postcolonial

• Begins with the understanding western education was part of the colonial project. As Europeans claimed land around the world, they used western education to undercut local knowledge and customs and to institute systems—social, cultural, and political—that served western interests.

• Seeks to recapture “native” perspectives and ways of making knowledge. (Franz Fanon, Gaytri Spivak, Melea Powell)

Page 16: Tw 3.2 theoretical approaches

Post-process

• Critique of rote application of uniform writing process.

• Sees knowledge as contextual, contingent.• Thomas Newkirk, Rhonda Grego and Nancy

Thompson, The Everyday Writing Center• Critique: What does post-process offer writing

teachers?

Page 17: Tw 3.2 theoretical approaches

Next steps:

• What do writing tutors need to know?• Pretextual stage• Textual stage• Posttextual stage