Turkish airlines flight 1951

15
Turkish Airlines Flight 1951 16.12.2014 Dora Akcan Kubilay Baran Yiğit Öztuna Eray Arkış May Day Presentation ENG 105 Lecturer: Ayfer Karaca

Transcript of Turkish airlines flight 1951

Page 1: Turkish airlines flight 1951

Turkish Airlines Flight 1951

16.12.2014Dora Akcan

Kubilay BaranYiğit Öztuna

Eray Arkış

May Day PresentationENG 105

Lecturer: Ayfer Karaca

Page 2: Turkish airlines flight 1951

Outlines

• Introduction (describing the event)

• Investigation

• Impact of the Disaster

• Conclusion (opinion)

Page 3: Turkish airlines flight 1951

Introduction

• Date: 25 February 2009

• Site:North of the Polderbaan runway (nearAmsterdam Airport Schiphol)

• Aircraft Type: Boeing 737

• Aircraft Name: Tekirdağ

Page 4: Turkish airlines flight 1951

• Operator: Turkish Airlines

• Registration: TC-JGE

• Flight Origin: Istanbul Atatürk Airport, Istanbul, Turkey

• Destination: Amsterdam Airport Schiphol, Amsterdam, Netherlands

Page 5: Turkish airlines flight 1951

• Injuries (non-fatal): 86 (including 6 critical and 25 severe)

• Fatalities: 9

• Survivors: 126

Page 6: Turkish airlines flight 1951

Nationality People Fatalities

Netherlands 53 0

Turkey 51 (inc. 7 crew) 5 (inc. 4 crew)

United States 7 4

United Kingdom 3 0

Germany 1 0

Bulgaria 1 0

Italy 1 0

Taiwan 1 0

Total 125 (inc. 7 crew) 9 (inc. 4 crew)

Page 7: Turkish airlines flight 1951

Flight

• 128 Passengers

• 7 Flight Crew

• Instructor Captain Hasan Tahsin Arisan

• Olcay Özgür, safety pilot

• Murat Sezer, co-pilot under line training

• The cabin crew :Figen Eren, Perihan Özden, Ulvi Murat Eskin and Yasemin Vural

Page 8: Turkish airlines flight 1951

Investigation

1-Led by the Dutch Safety Board

2-Turkish Airlines and a representative team of the American NTSB

3-The UK Air Accidents Investigation Branch, and the French Bureau d'Enquêtes et d'Analyses pour la

sécurité de l'Aviation Civile (BEA)

Page 9: Turkish airlines flight 1951

Important Details

• Faulty radio altimeter, aggravated by pilot errors, stall

Page 10: Turkish airlines flight 1951

Impact• Dutch Safety Board

has published a report of his research associate with the accident in May 2010

• According to this report , main reason showed that two height indicator had different values .

Page 11: Turkish airlines flight 1951

Technically• 1-Boeing improved the reliability of the height

measuring system.

• 2-US Federal Aviation Administration ( FAA) and European Aviation Safety Agency (EASA)improved radio altimes system for safety.Thus, they prevent unwanted situations like this.

• 3- Boeing, FAA ve EASA developed audible/voice warning system during the low speed flight.

Page 12: Turkish airlines flight 1951
Page 13: Turkish airlines flight 1951

• Normally all of the types of the aircrafts have this system. For example ; If the aircraft approaches the minimum speed, warning goes to the crew.

• ( GPWS ground proximity warning system )

Page 14: Turkish airlines flight 1951

Operational

• Boeing reviewed ; Approach to stall system

• This system include autothrottle and trimming

• Turkish Civil Aviation , International Civil Aviation Association ( ICAO) , FAA and EASA changed their training which given to pilots about approach to stall.

Page 15: Turkish airlines flight 1951

CONCLUSİON