Tugas Pengantar Manajemen Konteporer Binder1
-
Upload
iman-hitachi -
Category
Documents
-
view
225 -
download
0
Transcript of Tugas Pengantar Manajemen Konteporer Binder1
-
8/13/2019 Tugas Pengantar Manajemen Konteporer Binder1
1/196
ORGANISING
Intr oduction
Part Four examines how management creates the structure within which people
work. Alongside planning the direction of the usiness! managers need to consider
how the" will achie#e the direction chosen. A fundamental component of that is the
form of the organisation. $his is a highl" uncertain area of management as there are
conflicting #iews aout the kind of structure to ha#e and how much influence struc%
ture has on performance.
&hapter '( descries the main elements of organisation structure and the contrast%
ing forms the" take. &hapter '' deals with one aspect of an organisation)s structure*
the human resource management policies. $hese are intended to ensure that
emplo"ees work towards organisational o+ecti#es.
&hapter ', -formerl" &hapter ,( focuses on information technolog" and e%usiness!
showing how the application of technological de#elopments has deep implications for
organisations and their management. &hapter '/ looks at some of the issues that
arise in implementing organisational change and in stimulating inno#ation.
-
8/13/2019 Tugas Pengantar Manajemen Konteporer Binder1
2/196
&hapter '(
Organisation structure
Aim
Objectives
Key terms
$o introduce terms and practices that show the choices managers
face in shaping organisational structures.
0" the end of "our work on this chapter "ou should e ale to outline
the concepts elow in "our terms and*
1 Outline wh" the structure of an organisation affects performance
2 Gi#e examples of management choices aout di#iding and
coordinating work! with their likel" ad#antages and disad#antages
3 &ompare the features of mechanistic and organic structures
4 1se the 2contingencies) elie#ed to influence choice of structure
to e#aluate the suitailit" of a form for a gi#en unit
5 Summarise the work of 3oodward! 0urns and Stalker! 4awrence and
4orsch and 5ohn &hild! showing how the" contriuted to this area ofmanagement theor"
6 6xplain and illustrate the features of a learningorganisation.
$his chapter introduces the following ideas*
organisation structure
organisation chart
formal structure
informal structure
#ertical specialisationhori7ontal specialisation
formal authorit"
responsiilit"
delegation span
of control
centralisation
decentralisation
formalisation
functional structure
di#isional structure
matrix structure
network structure
mechanistic structureorganic structure
contingencies
technolog"
differentiation
integration
determinist
structural choice
6ach is a term defined within the text! as well
as in the Glossar" at the end of the ook.
-
8/13/2019 Tugas Pengantar Manajemen Konteporer Binder1
3/196
/'8
Oticon
Oticon www.oticon.com C A S E S T U DY
$his 9anish compan" is the world)s second largest pro%
ducer of hearing aids with aout '!,(( staff in 9enmark-the parent compan"! 3illiam 9emant :oldings! has
aout ;;(( emplo"ees worldwide. Oticon has research
and production facilities that help ensure the high%
-
8/13/2019 Tugas Pengantar Manajemen Konteporer Binder1
4/196
C$A%TE& 1" ORGANISA$ION S$R1&$1R6
1"#1 Introduction
Managers at Oticon had to adapt its structure to survive newcompetition. This required not only lower costs, but also an ability torespond more quickly to the needs of individ- ual customers and to
broader changes in technology and in the market.enior managers of companies that have not been performingwell frequently announce structural changes. !hen hell was trying to recover from the "##$ oil reserves crisis the board firstdismissed the three senior e%ecutives involved in the failure& and then started to change the structure to prevent arecurrence. 'n "##( )adbury chweppes announced that it wouldsplit the drinks and confectionery parts of the busi- ness intoseparate companies, in the belief that this would allow both toperform better. Management at *hilips, the +utch electronicsgroup, has been working to ensure that the fiercely independent
units in the company cooperate more closely with each other toimprove performance.!hen an owner-manager is running a small business he or she
decides what tasks to do and coordinates them. 'f the enterprisegrows the entrepreneur usually passes some of the work to newlyrecruited staff, though the division will probably be fle%ible andinformal. Owner and staff can easily communicate directly with eachother, so coordina- tion is easy. 'f the business continues to grow,new structural questions arise about how best to use availableresources. Managers divide the enterprise into distinct units ofactivity & which brings the possibility of misunderstanding between
people in separate units with less direct contact they need toestablish some mechanisms to ensure coordi- nation. ow they dothis reflects their theory about organisation structure.
This chapter outlines the structural issues that managers in allorganisations need to resolve, and which igure /#./ illustrates.Managers create a formal structure when they decide how to divideand coordinate the work of the organisation. These decisions inpart reflect their interpretation of contingencies affecting thebusiness, and in part the views of stakeholders. Together withmany informal arrangements, these decisions create a structurethat balances mechanistic and organic forms, which affect
organisa- tional performance.
Stakeholderpreferences
9i#iding work&o%ordinating work
Dechanistic ororganic forms Performance
-
8/13/2019 Tugas Pengantar Manajemen Konteporer Binder1
5/196
96SIGNING A S$R1&$1R6
'i(ure 1"#1
Alternati#e
structures and
performance
0usinesscontingencies
E strateg"E technolog"E agesi7eE en#ironment
/'>
-
8/13/2019 Tugas Pengantar Manajemen Konteporer Binder1
6/196
01
1"#2 9esigning a structure
Or(a!isati! structure describes the way work is divided, supervisedand coordinated. !hen people 2oin a department or take a 2obwithin the structure this gives a fairly clear signal about what they
should do. The director of marketing is e%pected to deal withmarketing, not finance. 3arious 4operating policies5 reinforce thesignal from the basic structure. These cover matters such asrecruitment, selection, appraisal and reward 6)hapter //7 whichmanagers design to influence employees to act in ways that supportwider ob2ectives.
Or(a!isati! structure
2$he structure of an
organisation isH the sum
total of the wa"s in which
it di#ides its laour intodistinct tasks and then
achie#es co%ordination
among them) -Dint7erg!
'=8=.
T)e r(a!isati! c)art
The r(a!isati! c)art shows the structure as a picture. 't shows themain departments and positions, with lines linking senior e%ecutives
to the departments or people for whose work they are responsible.'t shows who people report to, and clarifies four fea- tures of the*rma+ structure
1 tasks & the ma2or tasks or activities theorganisation undertakes82 subdivisions & how the ma2or tasks arefurther divided83 levels & the position of each post within themanagement hierarchy84 lines of authority & the lines linking the bo%es show who hasformal authority over
whom, and to whom people report.
Organisation charts give a convenient 6though transient7summary of the current allocation of tasks and who is responsiblefor them. igure /#." shows the chart for an aircraft factory withinwhat is now 9:; ystems, a
-
8/13/2019 Tugas Pengantar Manajemen Konteporer Binder1
7/196
An r(a!isati! c)art shows the main departments and senior positions in an organisation and the reporting
relations etween them.
'rma+ structure is the official guidelines! documents or procedures setting out how the organisation)s
acti#ities are di#ided and coordinated.
0!*rma+ structure is the undocumented relationships etween memers of the organisation that ine#ital"
emerge as people adapt s"stems to new conditions and satisf" personal and group needs.
ertica+ s.ecia+isati! refers to the extent to which responsiilities at different le#elsare defined.
$ri/!ta+ s.ecia+isati! is the degree to which tasks are di#ided among separate people or departments.
-
8/13/2019 Tugas Pengantar Manajemen Konteporer Binder1
8/196
Factor"
General Danager
9esign Production Purchasing In#entor" Production :uman
9irector 6ngineering 9irector 9irector 9irector Resources9irector 9irector
6lectrical
DanagerDechanical
Danager
Aerostructures
Danager
&ompletions
Danager
Area Danagers
Principal
Structures6ngineer
Principal
S"stems6ngineer
Principal
Furnishings
6ngineer
6lectrics Flight $est
FinalAsseml" 9e#elopment
Senior
6ngineers
6ngineers
6lectrics
Super#isors
Powerplant
Super#isors
:"draulics
Super#isors
Fl"ing
&ontrols
Operators
'i(ure 1"#2 $he structure within a 0A6 aircraft factor" -www.aes"stems.com
ma!a(eme!ti! .ractice u+tis) Eve!ts
Dulti%show 6#ents emplo"s '' people pro#iding a #ariet" of entertainment and promotional ser#ices
to large usinesses. 3hen 0rian Simpson created the usiness in '==( with a full%time staff of , the
compan" o#iousl" had no formal structure. :e reflected on the process of growth and structure*
3hile the compan" was small thinking aout a structure ne#er occurred to me. It ecame a considera%tion as sales grew and the complexit" of what we offered increased. $here were also more people
around and I elie#ed that I should introduce a structure so that clear di#isions of responsiilit"would
e #isile. It seemed natural to split sales and marketing from the actual deli#er" and production of
e#ents as these were two distinct areas. I felt that " creating 2specialised) departments we could gi#e
a etter ser#ice to clients as each area of the compan" could focus more on their own roles. Figure
'(./ shows the structure.H
3e had to redesign the office la"out and introduce a more formalised communication process to
ensure all rele#ant information is eing passed on @ and on the whole I think this structure will see
us through the next stage of usiness growth and de#elopment.
Source* Pri#ate communication.
/,(
-
8/13/2019 Tugas Pengantar Manajemen Konteporer Binder1
9/196
96SIGNING A S$R1&$1R6
0A
C)ai! * cmma!
The lines of authority show the links between people & who theyreport to and who reports to them. 't shows who they can ask todo a piece of work, who they can ask for help & and who will bee%pecting results from them. 'n igure /#." the production direc- tor
can give instructions to the aerostructures manager, but not to theelectrical manager in production engineering. igure /#.1 shows thelines of authority in Multi-show ;vents. 'n both there are manyinformal contacts in the course of normal human activ- ity, whichbring the organisation to life and help people cope with unplannedevents.
The lines of authority show the allocation of *rma+ aut)rity within
the organisation& the right a person has to make decisions, allocate resources orgive instructions. 't isbased on the position, not the person. The production engineering
director at 9:; hasformal authority over a defined range of matters & and anyone elsetaking over the 2obwould have the same amount offormal authority.
ubordinates & those below someone else in the hierarchy &comply with instructions
or requests because they accept the person has the formal6sometimes called legitimate7authority to make them. :n operator in the hydraulics area offinal assembly would
accept an instruction from the hydraulics foreman, but probablynot from the power-plant foreman 6he or she may help them as a personal favour, butthat is different fromaccepting formal authority7. 'f managers attempt to give instructionsbeyond their areaof formal authority they are likely tomeet resistance.
&es.!sibi+ity is a person5s duty to meet the e%pectations associatedwith a task.The
production director and the hydraulics foreman are responsible for
the tasks that gowith those positions. To fulfil those responsibilities they requireformal authority tomanage relevantresources.
:ccountability means that people with formal authority over anarea are required to
report on their work to those above them in the chain of command.The principal sys-tems engineer is accountable to the mechanical manager for theway he or she has used
resources have they achieved what was e%pected as measured by
the cost,quantity, qual-it
yortimeline
ssofthewo
rkB
-
8/13/2019 Tugas Pengantar Manajemen Konteporer Binder1
10/196
C$A%TE& 1" ORGANISA$ION S$R1&$1R6
'rma+ aut)rity is the right that a person in a specified role has tomake decisions! allocate resources or gi#e instructions.
&es.!sibi+ity refers to
a person)s dut" to meetthe expectations others
ha#e of them.
Danaging 9irector
Operations 9epartment
Operations DanagerSales and Darketing
Darketing Danager
0ookkeeper
6#ent
DanagerAssistant
Danager
Operations
&o%ordinator
Account
Danager
Account
Danager
Account
Danager
Admin
AssistantStoreman Admin
Assistant
'i(ure 1"#3 $he organisation structure at Dulti%show 6#ents
-
8/13/2019 Tugas Pengantar Manajemen Konteporer Binder1
11/196
Oticon @ the case continues @ hierarch"and rank www.oticon.com
C A S E S T U D Y
0efore the change the compan" had six distinct hierar%
chical le#els!with pri#ileges ased on rank*
Not onl" was there a specific compan" car assigned to
each management le#el!ut other material signs existed
... prestige and reward were #er" apparent* in the lengthof
the curtains! the t"pe of carpet ... the si7e of people)s
desks. It all ga#e status. And that was what people stro#e
for. -Ri#ard et al.! ,((;! p. '>'
:ori7ontal oundaries were also strong! as the two
main di#isions @ 6lectronics -product de#elopment and
International -sales communicated poorl". 3ithin these
di#isions work was organised round specific depart%
ments and tasks* 2People were lockedinto specific roles
and responsiilities and were rewarded onl" for those @
nood" took initiati#es) -Ri#ard et al.! ,((;! p. '>(.
Source* 0ased on 0+orn%Andersen and $urner -'==; and Ri#ard et al.
-,((;.
De+e(ati! occurs whenone person gi#es another
the authorit" to
undertake specific
acti#ities or decisions.
De+e(ati! is the process by which people transfer responsibilityand authority for certain parts of their work to people below themin the chain of command. !hile the production director isresponsible and accountable for all the work in that area, they areonly able to do this by delegating. They are still accountable for theresults, but they pass the responsibility, and the necessar yauthority, to subordinates & and this continues down the hierarchy.'f managers delegate more to their subordinates this enables quickerdecisions and more rapid responses to new conditions & thoughsome managers are reluctant to delegate in case it reduces theirpower 6)hapter /$7.
T)e s.a! * c!tr+
A s.a! * c!tr+ is
the numer of
suordinates reporting
directl" to the person
ao#e them in the
hierarch".
The s.a! * c!tr+ refers to the number of subordinates reportingto a supervisor. !here staff are closely supervised there is a narrowspan of control & as shown in the top half of igure /#.$. 'f staff havemore autonomy and responsibility they need less direct supervision,so more can report to the same manager & the span of controlbecomes wider, and the structure flatter.
- eyieas
6a! ,ar7s researc)
5oan 3oodward)s stud" of '(( firms in 6ssex found great #ariet" amongst them in the numer of su%
ordinates managers super#ised -3oodward! '=J. $he numer of people reporting directl" to the
chief executi#e ranged from , to '>! with the median span of control eing . $he a#erage span of
control of the first line super#isors #aried from '( to =(! with a median of /8. 3oodward explained
the #ariation " the technological s"stem used -discussed more full" in Section '(..
Ce!tra+isati! a! ece!tra+isati!
http://www.oticon.com/http://www.oticon.com/http://www.oticon.com/http://www.oticon.com/http://www.oticon.com/ -
8/13/2019 Tugas Pengantar Manajemen Konteporer Binder1
12/196
/,,
!hen an organisation grows beyond the smallest operationmanagement divides work vertically, as those at the top delegatemore of their work to those below them & and so begin to create ahierarchy such as that shown in igure /#.$. :s the business growsthe hierarchy becomes more comple%, but it is often possible to seethree levels & corporate, divisional and operating & such as at)adbury chweppes 6www.cadur"schweppes.com7.
-
8/13/2019 Tugas Pengantar Manajemen Konteporer Binder1
13/196
96SIGNING A S$R1&$1R6
0(
-aA tall structure! with narrow spans of super#ision
-bA flat structure! with wide spans of super#ision
'i(ure 1"#4
$all and flat
organisation
structures
Corporate The most senior group, such as the board of )adburychweppes, who are responsible for managing the overall
direction of the organisation. This includes not only guiding andmonitoring the performance of the organisation but also maintain-ing links with significant e%ternal institutions such as banks andpolitical bodies.
Divisional Cesponsible for implementing broad areas of policyand for allocating budgets and other resources. )adburychweppes is organised geographically so the managers in, fore%ample, the ;urope, Middle ;ast and :frica 6;M;:7 division areresponsible for meeting the targets which the board sets for thatdivision. +ivisional managers represent the division5s interests tothe board and also monitor and control the performance of the
operating units. Operating The level responsible for the technical work of any
organisation & making products, catching thieves, caring forpatients or delivering services. !ithin ;M;: at )adbur y5s thereis a team responsible for the +air y Milk brand in the
-
8/13/2019 Tugas Pengantar Manajemen Konteporer Binder1
14/196
C$A%TE& 1" ORGANISA$ION S$R1&$1R6
0E
Ce!tra+isati! is when arelati#el" large numer of decisions are taken " management at the top of the
organisation.
Dece!tra+isati! is when a relati#el" large numer of decisions are taken lowerdown the organisation in the
operating units.
-
8/13/2019 Tugas Pengantar Manajemen Konteporer Binder1
15/196
ma!a(eme!ti! .ractice %)i+i.s ww w.philips.com
After a period of hea#" lossesduring the '==(s Philips! the 9utch electronics compan"! appointed a
new chief executi#e in ,((' @ Gerard ?leisterlee. :e acted
-
8/13/2019 Tugas Pengantar Manajemen Konteporer Binder1
16/196
Tab+e 1"#1
'actr Ava!ta(es Disava!ta(es
&es.!se t c)a!(e $horough deate of issues Slower responseto localconditions
Use * e9.ertise &oncentration of expertise at the 4ess likel" to take account of local
centre makes it easier to de#elop knowledge
new ser#ices and promote est
practice methods
Cst 6conomies of scale in purchasing 4ocal suppliers ma" e etter #alue
6fficient administration i f use than corporate suppliers
common s"stems
%+icy im.+icati!s 4ess risk of localmanagers Dore risk of localmanagers
reaching legal re
-
8/13/2019 Tugas Pengantar Manajemen Konteporer Binder1
17/196
-
8/13/2019 Tugas Pengantar Manajemen Konteporer Binder1
18/196
e%pertise worktogether,sharing andseeing aprofessionalcareer path. :difficulty is
that it may bea source ofconflict 6Fautaand aunders,"##/7 if theseparatefunctionsdevelopdifferentperceptions oforganisational
goals. Thesame mayhappen as anorganisationgrows anddiversifies intoa range ofdifferentproducts,markets orgeographical
areas.Managers
-
8/13/2019 Tugas Pengantar Manajemen Konteporer Binder1
19/196
GRO1PING 5O0S IN$O F1N&$IONS AN9 9IKISIONS
&hairman and Non%executi#e 9irectors
&hief 6xecuti#e Officer
9irector of Nursing
and Mualit"9irector of Dedical
Ser#ices
9irector of Finance 9irector of :uman
Resoures
&linical 9irectors
&linical Nurse Danager 0usiness Danagers
3ard Danagers -Sisters
3ard staff
Professional responsiilit"
Danagerial responsiilit"
'i(ure 1"#6
Partial
organisation
structure in a
hospital
responsible for these areas e%pect functional staff to give thempriority & leading to com- petition between business units forfunctional services.
S.ecia+isati! by ivisi!s
Managers create a ivisi!a+ structure when they arrange theorganisation around its main products, services or customergroups. 'n a divisional structure senior managers give each unit theauthority to design, produce and deliver the product or service.unctions within the division are likely to cooperate as theydepend on satisfying the same set of customers, though duplicatingfunctions make it e%pensive.
%ruct r custmer
+ivisional structures enable staff to focus on a distinct group ofcustomers. 9anks know that wealthy clients have different needsfrom other people & and have created divisions to focus on meetingthose needs. ospitals can use what they term the 4named-nurse5system, in which one nurse is responsible for several identifiedpatients. That nurse is the patient5s point of contact with thesystem, managing the deliver y of services to the patient fromother 6functional7 departments. igure /#.( contrasts theapproaches.
;e(ra.)ic ivisi!s
ere managers group tasks by geography & a common approach
in companieswith manyservice outlets& supermarkets,hotels or pubchains. 't allowspeople to focuson identifyingand meetingdifferent
customerrequirementsin the region,and it is alsoeasier fordivisionalmanagers tomonitor andcontrol themany outlets &see Table /#.".
-
8/13/2019 Tugas Pengantar Manajemen Konteporer Binder1
20/196
C$A%TE& 1" ORGANISA$ION S$R1&$1R6A ivisi!a+ structure is when tasks are grouped in relation to their outputs! such as products or the needs of
different t"pes of customer.
-
8/13/2019 Tugas Pengantar Manajemen Konteporer Binder1
21/196
'u!cti!a+ &lear career paths andprofessional de#elopment
Specialisation leadsto high
standards and efficienc"
&ommon professional interests
support good internal relations
Isolation from wider interestsdamages promotion prospects
&onflict o#er priorities
4ack of wider awareness damages
external relations
Divisi!a+ Functional staff focus on product
and customer needs
9edicated facilities meet customer
needs
-
8/13/2019 Tugas Pengantar Manajemen Konteporer Binder1
22/196
C$A%TE& 1" ORGANISA$ION S$R1&$1R6
1"#4 Grouping +os in matrices! teams and networks
atri9 structure
A matri9 structure combines functional and divisional structures
function on one a%is of the matri% and products or pro2ects on theother. unctional staff work on one or more pro2ects, movingbetween them as required. They report to two bosses & a func-tional head and the head of the current pro2ect.
A matri9 structure is
when those doing a taskreport oth to a
functional and a pro+ect
or di#isional oss.
%ruct eve+.me!t at Tyta ww w .to" ota.c omma!a(eme!t
i! .ractice
$o"ota used to organise its product de#elopment in a matrix form. $he product planning di#ision
emplo"ed aout 8((( people working on ' current pro+ects. 6ach represented a new model and
emplo"ed a chief engineer and se#eral hundred staff. $here were also ' functional engineering
di#isions.
A chief engineer had to co%ordinate people in ;> departments in ', di#isions to launch a new product
... In addition! relati#el" "oung chief engineers did not alwa"s get sufficient co%operation from
senior functional managers ... For their part! functional managers found it difficult to spend the time
on man% aging details on so man" pro+ects. Dost of these managers had to o#ersee work for aout 'J
different pro+ects at the same time.
Source* &usumano and Noeoka -'==>! pp. ,,@,;.
Teams
'n their search for more fle%ibility, lower costs and faster responsesome companies organise work into teams & most evident incompanies that depend on a steady flow of new products & such as>ohnson G >ohnson or *hilips. Management delegates significantresponsibilities and authority not to individual workers but to anidentifiable team, which is then accountable for the results 6)hapter/(7.
:etr-s:etr- structures refer to situations in which organisations remainindependent but agree to work together to deliver products orservices. ometimes this happens when managers arrange forother companies to undertake certain non-core activities on theirbehalf. The remaining organisation concentrates on setting strategydirection and man- aging the core units. :bbey 6a panish-owned
-
8/13/2019 Tugas Pengantar Manajemen Konteporer Binder1
23/196
GRO1PING 5O0S IN DA$RI&6S! $6ADS AN9 N6$3OR?S
managers sell one of their services to another com- pany, but stilldeliver the service to customers under their own name. :bbeysold its credit card business to M9F: as the cost of updating itssystems to compete effectively in the card business was too high.The company continues to offer cards with the :bbey logo, butM9F: operates the service.
A !etr- structure
is when tasks re
-
8/13/2019 Tugas Pengantar Manajemen Konteporer Binder1
24/196
i9e *rms
Harge organisations typically combine functional, product andgeographical structures within the same company & the structure of
-
8/13/2019 Tugas Pengantar Manajemen Konteporer Binder1
25/196
Direct su.ervisi!
This is where a manager ensures coordination by directlysupervising his or her staff to ensure they work together in line withcompany policy. The number of people whom a
-
8/13/2019 Tugas Pengantar Manajemen Konteporer Binder1
26/196
C$A%TE& 1" ORGANISA$ION S$R1&$1R6
manager can effectively supervise directly reflects the idea of thespan of control & that beyond some 6variable7 point directsupervision is no longer sufficient.
$ierarc)y
'f disputes or problems arise between staff or departments, theycan be reconciled by putting the arguments to their common boss inthe hierarchy. 't is the boss5s responsibil- ity to reach a solution. :t9:; 6igure /#."7, if the engineer responsible for structures has adisagreement with the systems engineer, they can ask themechanical manager to ad2udicate. 'f that fails they can escalatethe problem to the production eng ineering director. The weaknessof this is that it takes time to get a response, and meantime theissue is unresolved. 'n rapidly changing circumstances thehierarchy cannot cope with the volume of issues requiring attention,
and becomes slow at making decisions.
Sta!arisi!( i!.uts a! ut.uts
This involves making sure that what goes into the system, and whatmanagers e%pect it to produce, are standardised. 'f the purchaser ofcomponents specifies accurately what is required, and the suppliermeets that specification, coordination between users will be easier.'f staff work to precise specifications that helps coordination withthe ne%t stage. 'f they receive the same training they will need lessdirect supervision, as their manager can be more confident that theywill be working consistently.
&u+es a! .rceures
:nother coordination method is to prepare rules or procedures,such as that shown in the Management in *ractice feature.Organisations have procedures for approving capi- tal e%penditure.To compare proposals on a common basis they set strict guidelineson the questions a bid should answer, how people should prepare acase, and to whom they should submit it. )ompanies developing
computer software have coordination problems if several designersare working on a pro2ect, so use strict change control procedures toensure that the sub-pro2ects fit together.
Sa*ety .rceures i! a .er stati!ma!a(eme!t
i! .ractice
$he following instructions go#ern the steps that staff must follow when the" inspect control e
-
8/13/2019 Tugas Pengantar Manajemen Konteporer Binder1
27/196
&OOR9INA$ING 3OR?
, Otain ke"s for rele#ant cuicles.
/ Kisuall" inspect the interior of each a" for dirt! water and e#idence of condensation.
; Kisuall" inspect the caling! glands! terminal locks and components for damage.
J Kisuall" check for looseconnections at all terminals.
4ock all cuicles and return the ke"s.
8 &lear the safet" document and return it to the Super#isorSenior Authorised person.
-
8/13/2019 Tugas Pengantar Manajemen Konteporer Binder1
28/196
C$A%TE& 1" ORGANISA$ION S$R1&$1R6
0!*rmati! systems
'nformation systems help to ensure that people who need to workin a consistent way have common information, so that it is easier tocoordinate their activities. The 'nternet offers a radical way ofmoving information and knowledge between organisations, as the
iemens e%ample shows.
ma!a(eme!ti! .ractice 0!ter!et cri!ati! at Sieme!s ww w.siemens.com
Dr #on Pierer! chief executi#e of Siemens! is enthusiastic aout the wa" the compan" is using the
Internet to coordinate different parts of the compan". One example is online purchasing! which
enales the compan" to sa#e huge amounts of mone" " pooling the demands of se#eral purchasing
departments! using a compan"%wide s"stem called click,procure.
Another is encouraging customers to u" online. $he" can click on 2u" from Siemens) on the
we% site home page and place orders for most Siemens products. $he automation and dri#es
di#ision! for example! generates some /( per cent of its sales online. $he strateg" also helps to
impro#e internal administrati#e processes @ such as " handling /(!((( +o applications a "ear
online! or expecting emplo"ees to ook their usiness tra#el arrangements o#er the Internet.
$here is more to this than paperless administration. $he idea is to make sure that the whole suppl"
chain @ from customers! through Siemens! and then on to its suppliers @ runs smoothl".
Kon Pierer also wants customers to ha#e a single! coordinated #iew of thecompan"*
I don)t think that in the future customers will tolerate four or fi#e different #iews aout Siemens. $he"
want one #iew of our capailities. 6#en if a customer is u"ing things from se#eral different Siemens
di#isions! it should deal directl" with onl" one! which should act as a leadmanager within the compan".Inside Siemens! the customer should e identified " onl" one code.
:owe#er he acknowledged that reorganising all the internal processes would e a ma+ortask.
Source* 0odd" et al. -,((J and compan"wesite.
Many companies now conduct their purchasing over the 'nternet,ensuring that new instructions to hundreds of suppliers flow almost
automatically as the manufacturing programme changes to matchcurrent orders. This was previously a laborious task in whichpeople easily made mistakes the 'nternet makes it tightlycoordinated.
Direct .ers!a+ c!tact
The most human form of coordination is when people talk to eachother. Mint?berg 6/@(@7 found that people use this method in boththe simplest and the most comple% organisation. There is so much
uncertainty in the latter that information systems cannot cope & only
http://www.siemens.com/http://www.siemens.com/http://www.siemens.com/http://www.siemens.com/http://www.siemens.com/http://www.siemens.com/ -
8/13/2019 Tugas Pengantar Manajemen Konteporer Binder1
29/196
&OOR9INA$ING 3OR?
direct contact can do this, by enabling people to making personalcommit- ments to each other across business units 6ull and pinosa,"##A7.
-
8/13/2019 Tugas Pengantar Manajemen Konteporer Binder1
30/196
C$A%TE& 1" ORGANISA$ION S$R1&$1R6
Cri!ati! i! a scia+ servicema!a(eme!t
i! .ractice
$he organisation cares for the elderl" in a large cit". Someone who had worked there for se#eral
"ears reflected on coordination*
3ithin the centre there was a manager! , deputies! an assistant manager! J senior care officers
-S&Os and /( officers. 6ach S&O is responsilefor care officers! allowing dail" contact etween the
super#i% sor and the suordinates. 3hile this defines +o roles
-
8/13/2019 Tugas Pengantar Manajemen Konteporer Binder1
31/196
D6&:ANIS$I& AN9 ORGANI& S$R1&$1R6S
rather than position. Management accepts
A mec)a!istic
structure means
there is a high degree
of task specialisation!people)s responsiilit"
and authorit" are
closel" defined and
decision making is
centralised.
-
8/13/2019 Tugas Pengantar Manajemen Konteporer Binder1
32/196
An r(a!ic structure is
one where people are
expected to work together
and to use their initiati#e
to sol#e prolems+o
descriptions and rules are
few and imprecise.
that those at the centre must depend on those nearest the actionto find the best solu- tion. )ommunication is likely to be hori?ontalamongst those familiar with the task. There may not be anorganisation chart, so fluid is the division of work. 9urns andtalker 6/@0/7 called this an r(a!ic structure. Table /#.1 comparesmechanistic and organic forms.
Tab+e1"#3
&haracteristics of
mechanistic and
organic s"stems
ec)a!istic Or(a!ic
Specialised tasks &ontriute experience to common tasks
:ierarchical structure of control Network structure of contacts
?nowledge locatedat top of hierarch" ?nowledge widel" spread
Kerticalcommunication :ori7ontal communication
4o"alt" and oedience stressed &ommitment to goals more important
Source* 0ased on 0urrns and Stalker -'='.
ma!a(eme!ti! .ractice A mre r(a!ic structure at %)i+i.s ww w.philips.com
$he 9utch group Philips is the world)s third largest consumer electronics compan" @ renownedfor
its inno#ati#e products. It has faced man" crises in recent "ears! and in ,((, was trading at a hea#"
loss. Gerard ?leisterlee ecame chief executi#e in ,((' and has made radical changes in the
compan")s structure. :e reduced the man" separate di#isions to +ust fi#e! and is reaking down
long%estalished internal di#isions) arriers to communication! so that expertise in one can e
used in another. For example the lighting group is working with the consumer electronics di#ision to
produce a room light% ing s"stem that changes colour according to what is eing shown on the $K.
Source* $he 6conomist! ', 5une,((;.
!ithin a large organisation some units will correspond tomechanistic forms and others to organic. : company may have acentralised information system and tightly controlled policies oncapital e%penditure & while also allowing divisions considerableautonomy on research or advertising.
Case questi!s 1"#2 3hat was the role of strateg" and technolog" in encouraging the change at OticonC
3hat features of the present form correspond to the organic modelC
:ow does management hope that the new structure will support their strateg"C
C!ti!(e!cies are
factors such as
uncertaint"!
interdependence and si7ethat reflect the situation
of the organisation.
http://www.philips.com/http://www.philips.com/http://www.philips.com/http://www.philips.com/http://www.philips.com/http://www.philips.com/ -
8/13/2019 Tugas Pengantar Manajemen Konteporer Binder1
33/196
!hy domanagersfavour oneform ofstructurerather thananotherB :
widely held6thoughdisputed7 viewis that itdepends oncertainc!ti!(e!cies
the essence ofthecontingencyparadigm is
thatorgani?ationaleffectivenessresults fromfittingcharacteristicsof theorgani?ation,such as itsstructure, tocontingenciesthat reflect the
situa- tion oftheorgani?ation.6+onaldson,"##/, p. /7
-
8/13/2019 Tugas Pengantar Manajemen Konteporer Binder1
34/196
uccessful organisations appear to be those in which managersmaintain a good fit between contingent factors 6such as strategy,technology, si?eIlife cycle and environmen- tal uncertainty7 and thestructure within which people work. igure /#./ illustrated thesecontingent factors & strategy, technology, ageIsi?e and environment.
Strate(y
)hapter E outlined *orter5s view that firms adopt one of threegeneric strategies & cost leadership, differentiation or focus. !ith acost leadership strategy managers concentrate on increasingefficiency to keep costs low. : mechanistic structure is likely to bethe best support for this strategy, with closely defined tasks in anefficient functional structure. There is likely to be a hierarchicalchain of command to ensure that people work to plan and verticalcommunication to keep the centre well informed. *owerDen, a
privatised electricity utility, initially took a cost&leadership approachand adopted a tight func- tional structure with detailed rules andperformance measures.
: differentiation strategy focuses on innovation & developing newproducts rapidly and imaginatively. :n organic structure is mostlikely to support this, by enabling ideas to flow easily betweenpeople with something to contribute, regardless of their function.Oticon moved towards this team-based structure, as has Microsoft inits efforts to main- tain high levels of innovation in its researchorganisation. :s *owerDen diversified into different businesses itsupported this with a structure of autonomous product divisions,
able to respond quickly to new demands. ill and *ickering 6/@E07showed that compa- nies in which business units had relativelyhigh decision-making authority were more successful than thosethat were centralised. The Management in *ractice feature showshow Dla%omith=line 6D=7 followed this approach when theboard restructured its CG+ activities into si% autonomous, but tightlyfocused, units.
;+a9Smit)K+i!e ww w .gsk.c omma!a(eme!t
i! .ractice
In Feruar" ,((' $achi Namada!head of RL9 at GlaxoSmith?line -GS?! set out the compan")s plan
to split the compan")s research organisation -2the engine room of an" pharmaceutical compan") into
six
2internal iotechnolog" companies). $hese units will compete for resources. 9i#ided along
therapeutic lines! the" will operate autonomousl". GS? is the world)s second largest drugs compan"!
and emplo"s
'J!((( scientists with an annual udget of ,.J illion. 5ean%Paul Garnier! chief executi#e! said that
organising this research group re
-
8/13/2019 Tugas Pengantar Manajemen Konteporer Binder1
35/196
J
attempted this efore.)
$he +o of the six autonomous units is to deli#er drugs with 2proof of concept) @ after small%scale
clinical tests on patients @ to GS?)s de#elopment organisation. $hat will put drugs through full
clinical trials! aimed at winning regulator" appro#al and maximising sales potential.
$he usiness units! called &entres of 6xcellence for 9rug 9isco#er" -&699s! can deli#er mole%
cules in#ented at GS? or rought in from academia or external iotech groups. 9r Namada said*
2$he" ha#e complete autonom". $he" can ha#e '(( chemists per pro+ect! or J. It doesn)t matter to
me how the" do it! solongas the" produce drugs.)&linical trials are undertaken on a massi#e scale! often across continents! and must compl" with
strict regulator" conditions. $hus corporate control! uniformit" and economies of scale are pre%
-
8/13/2019 Tugas Pengantar Manajemen Konteporer Binder1
36/196
eminent. $he other area where scale will e le#eragedis earl" research! where hundreds of millions
of pounds are spent on platform technolog". $wo di#isions! Genetics Research and 9isco#er"
Research! will work on understanding asic iolog" and on producing leadsto set drug disco#er"
units on their wa". Figure '(.> illustrates the new structure.
Internal 0iotechnolog" &ompanies
-small units
Neurolog"
1?
Ps"chiatr"
Ital"
Genetics and
disco#er"research
-large units
Anti%acterials1S
Respirator"
1?
Pre%clinical and
new product
de#elopment
-large units
1rogenital
1S
Detaolic! one
anti%#irals
'i(ure 1"#> $he structure introduced at GlaxoSmith?line
In ,((8 5ean%Pierre Garnier was ale to report that the change in structure was pa"ing off @ the
compan" now had a strong pipeline of new drugs! and was planning fi#e ma+or product launches
during the "ear.It was also creating additional &699s for inflammator" diseases and infection.
Source* 0ased on Financial $imes! ,; Octoer ,((, and = Feruar" ,((8.
igure /#.@ e%presses the idea that different strategies requiredifferent structures. The more the strategy corresponds to costleadership, the more likely it is that managers will support it with afunctional structure. 'f the balance is towards differentiation, themore likely there will be a divisional, team or network structure.
Tec)!+(y is the
knowledge! e
-
8/13/2019 Tugas Pengantar Manajemen Konteporer Binder1
37/196
Tec)!
+
(
y
Tec)!+(y
includes theknowledge,tools andtechniquesused to
transformorganisa-tional inputsinto outputs.'t includesbuildings,machines,computersystems andtheknowledge
andproceduresassociatedwith them.ometechnologiesseem to bebettersupported bysomestructures
than others.
-
8/13/2019 Tugas Pengantar Manajemen Konteporer Binder1
38/196
Functional
structure9i#isional Datrix Network or
team structures
Strategic
goals&ost leadership!
9ifferentiation!
inno#ation! flexiilit"! creati#it"
'i(ure 1"#?
$he relationshipprice! efficienc"! stailit" etween strategies
and structuralt"pes
>oan !oodward5s study of organisations and their structure 6/@0A7had a great influ- ence on thinking about management. hegathered information from /## 9ritish firms to establish whetherstructural features such as the span of control or the number of
levels in the hierarchy varied between them. The researchers couldsee no pattern until they analysed the companies by theirmanufacturing process, which they grouped into// categories, of three broad types. These formed a scale ofincreasing technical com- ple%ity. The researchers then noticed arelationship between the degree of technical comple%ity andcompany structure.
Unit and small batchproduction irms in this group produce goodsin small numbers, often to a customer5s unique order. 't is similarto craft work, as people and their skills are deeply involved in the
process & custom-built cycles, designer furniture, :ston Martinsports cars or lu%ury yachts. Large batch and mass production This form is typified by the
production of large quantities of standard products. The physicalproducts move along an assembly line, with peoplecomplementing the machinery & mobile phones, ord cars or;lectrolu% washing machines.
Continuous process ere the entire workflow is mechanised, in asophisticated and
comple% production technology. The machiner y does the production work,withoperators monitoring it, fi%ing faults and generally overseeing the process &aDuinness 9rewery, a hell oil refinery or a Mittal steel plant.
!oodward concluded that the different technologies imposedifferent demands on people.
-
8/13/2019 Tugas Pengantar Manajemen Konteporer Binder1
39/196
Technology also helps to deliver services, and managers createstructures to shape the way staff interact with customers. taff atbanks used to handle many cash transactions, and sat behindsecure glass screens that made them seem remote andunwelcoming.Technology means that little cash is now handled inbranches & which have been redesigned to bring staff andcustomers closer together. The *art $ )ase & Coyal 9ank of cotland
& traces structural changes in that service business, including itscentralised manufacturing division.
-
8/13/2019 Tugas Pengantar Manajemen Konteporer Binder1
40/196
E!vir!me!t
)hapter 1 showed how environments vary in terms of theircomple%ity and dynamism. Cesearch by age and :iken 6/@0(7,Derwin 6/@(@7 and ill and *ickering 6/@E07 shows that a firm5sperformance depends on having a structure that is suitable for its
environ- ment. 9urns and talker 6/@0/7 compared the structureof a long-established rayon plant in Manchester with the structuresof several new electronics companies then being created in the eastof cotland. 9oth types of organisation were successful & but haddif- ferent structures.
The rayon plant had clearly set out rules, tight 2ob descriptions,clear procedures, and coordination was primarily through thehierarchy. There was a high degree of specialisa- tion, with tasksdivided into small parts. Managers had defined responsibilitiesclearly and discouraged people from acting outside of their remit.They had centralised deci- sions, with information flowing up the
hierarchy, and instructions down.The small companies in the newly created electronics industry had
few 2ob descrip- tions, while procedures were ambiguous andimprecise. taff were e%pected to use their initiative to decidepriorities and to work together to solve problems. )ommunicationwas hori?ontal, rather than vertical 6see Table /#.17.
9urns and talker 6/@0/7 concluded that both forms wereappropriate for their circum- stances. The rayon plant had a stableenvironment, as it was the production unit of a larger business, andits sole purpose was to supply a steady flow of rayon to thecompany5s spin- ning factories. +elivery schedules rarely changed,
the technology of rayon manufacture was well known and fullydocumented. 'n contrast, the electronics companies were in directcontact with their customers, mainly the Ministry of +efence. Thedemand for com- mercial and military products was volatile, withfrequent changes in delivery requirements.The technology was new,often applying the results of recent research. )ontracts were oftentaken in which neither the customer nor the company knew whatthe end product would be it was likely to change during the courseof the work.
Oticon @ the case continues @ communicationand technolog" www.oticon.com
C A S E S T U D Y
4ars ?olind knew that the dramatic change in structure
he proposed would not e achie#ed without pain* he
was attacking the estalished culture! pri#ileges tied to
seniorit" and titles! and on work processes. In mo#ing to
an organi% sation in which there would e onl" pro+ect
memers! pro+ect leaders and pro+ect owners! man"
would not easil" accept losing the power the" deri#edfrom controlling infor% mation. :e used his power to dri#e
the change! announcing*
I am '(( per cent sure that we will tr" this. $here)s enough
time so that "ou can make a choice @ whether "ou are
going to tr" it with us or whether ... "ou find another +o
-
-
8/13/2019 Tugas Pengantar Manajemen Konteporer Binder1
41/196
dialogue is etter than e%mail! and designed the uild% ing to support face%to%face dialogue etween staff. $he
prolem owner will usuall" use e%mail or personal con%
tact to ring two or three people together and ha#e a
stand%up meeting. 9ecisions are noted in the computer
-accessile " e#er"one.
0" '==; the compan" had hal#ed product
de#elopment time and more than douled sales. It
emplo"ed half as man" administrati#e staff as in
'==(! ut doule the numer on product de#elopment.
Financial performance impro#ed dramaticall" in the
"ears following the change. 4ars ?olind said! 2:ardware
companies ha#e organisa% tions that look like
machines* a compan" that produces knowledge needs
an organisation that looks like a rain! i.e. which looks
chaotic and is unhierarchical.)
Source* 0ased on 0+orn%Andersen and $urner -'==; Ri#ard et al.-,((;.
-
8/13/2019 Tugas Pengantar Manajemen Konteporer Binder1
42/196
Case questi!s 1"#3 Oticon has had oth mechanistic and organic structures* what prompted the changeC
3h" has the new structure impro#ed usiness performanceC
9urns and talker 6/@0/7 concluded that neither mechanistic nororganic structures were appropriate in all situations. table,predictable environments were likely to encourage a mechanisticstructure. 3olatile, unpredictable environments were likely toencourage an organic structure. This recognition thatenvironmental conditions place different demands uponorganisations was a ma2or step in understanding why compa- nies
adopt contrasting structures & an idea illustrated in igure /#./#.
Structure
Dechanistic Organic
0!crrect 'it@ Crrect 'it@
1ncertain
-unstale
E!vir!me!t
&ertain
-stale
Dechanistic structure in uncertain
en#ironmentStructure too tight
Crrect 'it@
Dechanistic structure in certain
en#ironment
Organic structure in uncertain
en#ironment
0!crrect 'it@
Organic structure in certain
en#ironment
Structure too loose
'i(ure 1"#1" $he relationshipetween en#ironment and structure
Activity 1"#5 Cm.ari!( mec)a!istic a! r(a!ic *rms
$hink of a department "ou ha#e worked in! or aout which "ou can
gather information.
3as it roadl" mechanistic or organicC 3h" has that form e#ol#ed! and is it suitaleC :ow does it compare to other departments in the organisationC
-
8/13/2019 Tugas Pengantar Manajemen Konteporer Binder1
43/196
-
8/13/2019 Tugas Pengantar Manajemen Konteporer Binder1
44/196
Si/e a! +i*e cyc+e
mall organisations tend to be less formal with less division of labour& people take part in a wide range of tasks and coordination isachieved informally by face-to-face contact or direct supervision.!eber 6/@$(7 noted that larger organisations tended to have more
formal, bureaucratic structures, and research by 9lau 6/@(#7 and*ugh and ickson 6/@(07 showed that as organisations grow theydevelop more formal structures, hierar- chies and specialised units.Hike the head of Multi-show ;vents, as managers divide a growingbusiness into separate units they need more controls such as 2obdescriptions and reporting relationships.
;rt) a! structure i! a )usi!( assciati!ma!a(eme!t
i! .ractice
A manager in a housing association! which was created to pro#ide affordale housing for those onlow incomes! descries how its structure changed as it grew.
:ousing associations ha#e to gi#e tenants and their representati#esthe opportunit" to influence polic".
In the earl" da"s it had few staff! no clear di#ision of laour and few rules and procedures. It was suc%
cessful in pro#iding housing! which attracted more go#ernment funds! and the association grew.
Danaging more houses re
-
8/13/2019 Tugas Pengantar Manajemen Konteporer Binder1
45/196
their companies with a degree of for- malisation, specialisation andadministrative intensity. They survived, while those that lackedeven the most rudimentary structures failed.
'f a business continues to grow it takes on more of the featuresof a bureaucracy. There is more division of responsibilities andmore rules to ensure coordination. There are more professional andspecialist staff in areas such as finance or human resources, with
systems for budgeting, financial control and rewards. Mature,established firms tend to become mechanistic, with a strongvertical system and well-developed controls.
-
8/13/2019 Tugas Pengantar Manajemen Konteporer Binder1
46/196
More decisions are made at the centre & bringing the danger ofslow response to new conditions. To overcome these barriers toinnovation and to encourage cross-functional communicationmanagers may change the structure. One approach is todecentralise the organisation by creating separate divisions withprofit responsibility & as Microsoft did when it created seven
business units with a high degree of autonomy.
Oticon @ the case continues @ limitingriskswww.oticon.com
C A S E S T U D Y
3hile the changes at Oticon had spurred creati#it"! the
oard of the firm also ecame concerned aout prof%
itailit" in the earl" "ears! as the new structure wascreating so man" initiati#es and new products that it
was difficult to manage them all effecti#el". $he" there%
fore appointed Neils 5acosen as co%chief executi#e in
'==,! to place more emphasis on financial discipline
and performance. 5acosen took o#er from ?olind as
chief executi#e in '==>.
In '== more controls were introduced! to alance
some of the risks of the new form. A competence centre
was estalished that took o#er some of the rights pre#i%
ousl" held " pro+ect managers. It alone now had the
right
to initiate pro+ects and appoint pro+ect managers @ thus
restraining the earlier principle that an"one could start a
pro+ect. It also took o#er the task of negotiating salaries
that had initiall" een delegated to pro+ect managers.$hese changes were intended to o#ercome some of
the costs associated with the radical structure. 3hen
there was no limit to the numer of pro+ects! nor to the
numer of pro+ects on which a person could work! it had
ecome hard to ensure completion* the most capale
staff were spread o#er too man" pro+ects. $here was
also some concern that staff and teams were not alwa"s
sharing knowledge as full" as expected. 9espite these
ad+ustments! the compan" remains a radicall" different
form of organisation.
Source* 0ased on Foss -,((/.
C!ti!(e!cies r ma!a(eria+ c)iceB
Determi!ism is the
#iew that an
organisation)s structure
is determined " its
en#ironment.
Structura+ c)ice
approaches emphasise the scope management has for deciding the form of structure! irrespecti#e of external
conditions.
http://www.oticon.com/http://www.oticon.com/http://www.oticon.com/http://www.oticon.com/http://www.oticon.com/ -
8/13/2019 Tugas Pengantar Manajemen Konteporer Binder1
47/196
)ontingencyapproaches toorganisationstructurepropose thatthe mosteffective
structure willdepend 6becontingent7upon thesituation inwhich theorganisation isoperating
Theorgani?ation isseen as
e%isting in anenvironmentthat shapesits strategy,technology,si?e andinnovationrate. Thesecontingentfactors in turndetermine therequiredstructure8 thatis, thestructure thattheorgani?ationneeds toadopt if it isto operateeffectively.6+onaldson,/
@
@
0
,
p
.
"
7
;ffective
management
involves formulating an appropriate strategy and developing astructure which supports that strategy by encouraging appropriatebehaviour. The emphasis is etermi!ist 6the form is determined bythe environment7 and functionalist 6the form is intended to serveorganisational effectiveness7 6+onaldson, /@@A7. Management5srole is to make suitable ad2ustments to the structure to improveperform- ance as conditions change & such as by increasing
formality as the company grows. Others, such as D=, introducegreater divisional autonomy to encourage creativity orresponsiveness to local conditions.
>ohn )hild 6/@(", /@E$7 disagreed with this view, arguing thatcontingency theorists ignore the degree of structura+ c)ice whichmanagers have. The process of organisa- tional design is not only atechnical, rational matter but one shaped by political processes.These political considerations 6reflecting the values and interests ofinfluential groups7 are able to influence the structure that emergesfor these reasons
-
8/13/2019 Tugas Pengantar Manajemen Konteporer Binder1
48/196
46ARNING ORGANISA$IONS
The standards of performance against which organisationalperformance is assessed are not always rigorous. ome degree ofunder-performance caused by an inappropri- ate structure may betolerated if there is sufficient 4slack5 within the system.
To some e%tent structures will reflect the interests of powerfulgroups within the organisation. They will try to secure structuresthat protect or advance their positions, even if this reducesperformance to some degree.
Overall, writers of this view argue that contingency theory reducesmanagers almost to automatons, or puppets, able to e%ercise littleinfluence on their own actions. 'n practice, they argue, managers dohave choice over the structure they design. The contrasting ways inwhich leading grocery companies have used the 'nternet seems tosupport that view.
&etai+ers7 res.!se t t)e 0!ter!etma!a(eme!t
i! .ractice$he Internet makes it possile for supermarket chains to create a wesite on which customers can
order their shopping! which the compan" then deli#ers to their home. Sainsur")s responded" cre%
ating a new di#ision to handle this usiness! with a separate management structure! warehouses
and distriution s"stem. $esco chose to integrate its Internet shopping usiness with existing
stores @ staff pick the customer)s Internet order from the shel#es of a con#entional store. Other
chains! such as Somerfield and Dorrisons do not -in ,((8 offer an online ser#ice. So while the
technolog" is a#ail% ale to all! onl" some ha#e chosen to use it and the" manage it with different
structures.
Activity 1"#6 Critica+ re*+ecti!< c!ti!(e!cy r c)iceB
Recall some significant changes in the structure of "our organisation. $r" to
estalish the reasonsfor them! and whether the" had the intended effects. 9o
those reasonstend to support the contingenc" or management choice
perspecti#esC
Case questi!s 1"#4 9oes the Oticon example support contingenc" or management choice
approachesC
Gather specific examples of management actions in the case which illustrate
each theor".
:nother consideration is that the direction of causality is notnecessarily from strategy to structure. 't is also possible that anorganisation with a given structure finds that that makes it easier toembark on a particular strategy.
-
8/13/2019 Tugas Pengantar Manajemen Konteporer Binder1
49/196
C$A%TE& 1" ORGANISA$ION S$R1&$1R6
1"#= 4earning organisations
'nnovation is the main reason why many advocate the developmentof 4learning organi- sations5, since organisations that operate incomple% and dynamic environments can only be successfulinnovators if they develop the capacity to learn and respondquickly
-
8/13/2019 Tugas Pengantar Manajemen Konteporer Binder1
50/196
to changing circumstances. The term 4learning organisation5 isused to describe an organisation that has developed the capacity tocontinuously learn, adapt and change. 'n a learning organisation thefocus is on acquiring, sharing and using knowledge to encourageinnovation.
:ccording to Fonaka and Tageuchi 6/@@A7 the ability to create
knowledge and solve problems has become a core competence inmany businesses. 'n their view, everyone is a knowledge worker &someone dealing with customers, for e%ample, quickly finds outabout their likes and dislikes, and their view of the service. 9ecausethey are typically in low-paid 2obs far from corporate headquarters,this valuable intelligence is overlooked.
Tab+e1"#4
Features of a
learning
organisation
'eature E9.+a!ati!
A learningapproach $he use of trials and experiments to impro#e understanding and
to strateg" generate impro#ements! and to modif" strategic direction
Participati#e polic" All memers are in#ol#ed in strateg" formation! influencing decisions
making and #alues and addressing conflict
Informati#e Information technolog" is used to make information a#ailale to
e#er"one and to enale front%line staff to use their initiati#e
Formati#e accounting Accounting! udgeting and reporting s"stems are designed to help
and control people understand the operations of organisational finance
Internal exchange Sections and departments think of themsel#es as customers and
suppliers in an internal 2suppl" chain)! learningfrom each other
Reward flexiilit" A flexile and creati#e reward polic"! with financial and non%
financial rewards to meet indi#idual needs and performance
6naling structures Organisation charts! structures and procedures are seen as
temporar"! and can e changed to meet task re
-
8/13/2019 Tugas Pengantar Manajemen Konteporer Binder1
51/196
working, and employees operate with a high degree of autonomyto work as they think will best enhance performance. Cather thandirecting and controlling, managers act as facilitators,supporters and advocates & enabling their staff to work and learnto the greatest degree possible.
Hearning depends on information, so there is an emphasis onsharing information amongst employees in a timely and open
manner. This too depends on managers creat-
-
8/13/2019 Tugas Pengantar Manajemen Konteporer Binder1
52/196
Strate(y
E 4earning approachto strateg"
E Participati#e polic"
making
-i!( i!
E Informati#e
E Formati#e accountingand control
E Internal exchangeE Reward flexiilit"
Structure
E 6naling structures
-i!( ut
E 0oundar" workersas en#ironmentalscanners
E Inter%compan"learning
Source* Pedler et al. -'==8.
ear!i!( ..rtu!itiesE 4earning climateE Self%de#elopment
opportunities 'i(ure 1"#11
&lusters of
learning
organisation
features
ing a structure that encourages people to pass information in this
way. Headership is also important in the sense that one of theirprimary roles is to facilitate the creation of a shared vision for thebusiness, and ensuring employees are enabled to work continuallytowards that. inally the culture is one in which all agree on ashared vision and under- stand how all aspects of the organisation& its processes, activities, environment & are related to each other.There is a strong sense of community and mutual trust. *eople feelfree to share ideas and communicate, share and e%periment & ableto learn without fear of criticism or punishment.
:rgyris 6/@@@7 distinguished between single-loop and double-looplearning. The clas- sic e%ample of single-loop learning is the
domestic thermostat which, by detecting temperature variations,takes action to correct deviations from a predetermined level. 'nsingle-loop learning, the system maintains performance at the setlevel, but is unable to learn that the temperature is set too high ortoo low. Hearning how to learn involves double-loop learning &challenging assumptions, beliefs and norms, rather than accept- ingthem and working within their limitations. 'n single-loop learning,the question is4ow can we better achieve that standard of performanceB5 'ndouble-loop learning the question becomes 4's that an appropriatetarget in the first placeB5 'n the conte%t of developing the skills to
cope more effectively with change, the aim is to enhance the abil-
-
8/13/2019 Tugas Pengantar Manajemen Konteporer Binder1
53/196
ity of members to engage in double-loop learning.
-
8/13/2019 Tugas Pengantar Manajemen Konteporer Binder1
54/196
Structura+ e+eme!ts C!ve!ti!a+ r(a!isati! :e r(a!isati!
Initiati#e and authorit" &entralised 9istriuted
&ontrol &entralised! rule ased 9ecentralised! cultural
0asis of reward Indi#idual)s position Group performance
Roles Specialised! defined Fu77"! loosel"defined
S"stems $o reduceuncertaint" $o signal need for change
&oordination 0" rules and procedures 0" direct contact and IS
Networking Onl" ma+or stakeholders Integral to the #alue chain
Outsourcing 4ittle Duch -non%core acti#ities
Alliances A#oided 6xtensi#e
1"#> &urrent themes and issues
%er*rma!ce
)hanges in the business environment are encouraging managers
to e%periment with new forms of organisation
+uring the /@@#s the transition from an economy based on theprocessing of materials to one based on flows of information became evermore apparent, especially in the developed economies. The transitionunfettered many aspects of organi?ation from their former physicalconstraints, permitting, for e%ample, activities in dispersed locations to beas effectively integrated as those gathered on the same site. 'ncreasedinformation intensity is today the fundamental development to which neworgani?ational designs must respond. 6)hild, "##A, p. "(7
These trends encourage many to advocate a move from
bureaucratic, hierarchical, mechanistic structures to smaller, moreorganic units with more emphasis on personal discretion andcreativity. They argue that arrangements which encourageempower- ment, fle%ibility, learning, innovation and teamwork arethe only ways to survive in many sectors of the economy, andTable /#.A contrasts some features of conventional and 4new5forms.
Tab+e1"#5
&ontrasts etween
con#entional and
new forms oforganisation
The Oticon case in this chapter, and the e%amples of emco 6)hapter/$7 and !.H. Dore6the *art A )ase7 illustrate how some managements have respondedto these conditions.
owever, these decentralised structures also e%pose theorganisation to the danger
that actions by managers in the autonomous units damages thebusiness as a whole. 9*has suffered because staff in its
-
8/13/2019 Tugas Pengantar Manajemen Konteporer Binder1
55/196
companies have decen-tralised decision making to local managers.
&es.!sibi+ity
Many companies respond to competitive pressures by granting
significant autonomy to local subsidiaries, or 2oining a networkstructure of suppliers contributing to the final product. This oftenenables them to outsource the production of many goods and serv-
-
8/13/2019 Tugas Pengantar Manajemen Konteporer Binder1
56/196
S1DDAR
ices to poor regions of the world, which in turn is one of the maindrivers of globalisa- tion. These structural choices add to localincomes, and many governments compete for this work.
owever many criticise the policies and behaviour ofsubsidiaries and suppliers & especially when they adopt labourandIor environmental standards that would be unac- ceptable in the
companies5 home country. The structural changes do not, in theview of their critics, absolve the organisation from responsibility forwhat happens in their sup- pliers. Fike suffered bad publicity foryears after the conditions e%perienced by staff producing Fikeproducts in 'ndonesia were revealed. The company responded byfurther structural measures, such as a requirement that all supplierswould be regularly moni- tored and inspected to ensure they metadequate labour standards. )oca-)ola is currently receiving similarcriticism over the practices of some of its overseas 2oint ventures.
Ceconciling demands for greater accountability and control withthe performance benefits of decentralisation is a challenge for those
shaping organisational structure.
0!ter!ati!a+isati!
'nternationalisation makes it possible for a firm to e%tend itsoperations into many other countries, and so be able to producemore cheaply by spreading costs over a larger volume. :t the sametime it may face pressure to vary the design of its products andservices to suit local tastes. o managers may need to create astructure that is able to achieve both more standardisation and
more fle%ibility within the same organisational structure.The same process e%poses a firm to greater e%ternal comple%ity,by e%panding the number of organisations & customers, competitors,suppliers, governments, non-govern- mental organisations 6FDOs7and many more & whose actions may be relevant to it. Many moreevents in the e%ternal world are relevant to the global firm, whichneeds to enter into more intensive dialogue with e%ternal parties.This greater e%ternal comple%- ity has to be matched by suitablestructural arrangements & more specialists in relevant fields, andmore attempts to influence a wider constituency of stakeholders.
Summar"
1 Outline why the structure of an organisation affects performance *eople create structures to signify people5s tasks and
responsibilities towards the current ob2ectives, and to provideincentives for work that supports them. The structure signalswhat people are e%pected to do within the organisation, and isintended to support actions that are in line with performancegoals.
2 Dive e%amples of management choices about dividing andcoordinating work, with their likely advantages and disadvantages
-
8/13/2019 Tugas Pengantar Manajemen Konteporer Binder1
57/196
C$A%TE& 1" ORGANISA$ION S$R1&$1R6
Managers divide work to enable individuals and groups tospecialise on a limited aspect of the whole, and then combinethe work into related areas of activity.Task division needs to beaccompanied by suitable methods of coordination.
)entralisation brings consistency and efficiency, but also thedanger of being slow and out of touch with local conditions.*eople in decentralised units can respond quickly to local
conditions but risk acting inconsistently.
-
8/13/2019 Tugas Pengantar Manajemen Konteporer Binder1
58/196
S1DDAR
unctional forms allow people to specialise and develop e%pertiseand are efficient8
but they may be inward looking and prone to conflictingdemands.
+ivisional forms allow focus on particular markets of customergroups, but can duplicate facilities thus adding to cost.
Matri% forms try to balance the benefits of functional anddivisional forms, but can again lead to conflicting priorities overresources.
Fetworks of organisations enable companies to draw upon awide range of e%pert- ise, but may involve additionalmanagement and coordination costs.
3 )ompare the features of mechanistic and organic structures Mechanistic & people perform specialised tasks, hierarchical
structure of control, knowledge located at top of hierarchy,vertical communication, loyalty and obedi- ence valued.
Organic & people contribute e%perience to common tasks,network structure of contacts, knowledge widely spread,hori?ontal communication, commitment to task goals moreimportant than to superiors
4 ohn )hild, showing how they contributed to this area ofmanagement theory
!oodward appropriate structure depends on the type ofproduction system
64technology57 & unit, small batch, process.
9urns and talker appropriate structure depends onuncertainty of the organisa- tion5s environment & mechanistic instable, organic in unstable.
Hawrence and Horsch units within an organisation facedifferent environmental demands, which implies that there willbe both mechanistic and organic forms within the sameorganisation, raising new problems of coordination.
>ohn )hild contingency theory implies too great a degree ofdeterminism & man- agers have greater degree of choice overstructure than contingency theories implied.
6 ;%plain and illustrate the features of a learning organisation Hearning organisations are those that have developed the
capacity to continuously learn, adapt and change. This depends,
-
8/13/2019 Tugas Pengantar Manajemen Konteporer Binder1
59/196
C$A%TE& 1" ORGANISA$ION S$R1&$1R6
according to *edler et al. 6/@@(7, on evolv- ing learning-friendlyprocesses for looking in, looking out, learning opportunities,strategy and structure.
-
8/13/2019 Tugas Pengantar Manajemen Konteporer Binder1
60/196
&ON&419ING &RI$I&A4 R6F46&$ION
&evie questi!s
1 9raw the organisation chart of a compan" or department that "ou know. From discussing
it with people in one or more of the positions shown! compare their account of the
structure with that shown on the chart.
2 3hat factors are encouraging companies to -a centralise! - decentraliseorganisational functionsC
3 Se#eral forms of coordination are descried. Select two that "ou ha#e seen in operation
and descrie in detail how the" work @ and how well the" work.
4 :ow does the structure of an organisation support or hinder its strateg"C
5 6xplain the difference etween a mechanistic and an organic form of organisation.
6 6xplain the term 2contingenc" approach) and gi#e an example of each of the factors
that influence the choice etween mechanistic and organic structures.
= If contingenc" approaches stress the influence of external factors on
organisational structures! what is the role of management in designing
organisational structuresC
> 3hat is the main criticism of the contingenc" approach to organisation structureC
? 3hat examples can "ou find of organisational acti#ities that correspond to some of
the features of a learningorganisation identified " Pedler et al. -'==8C
C!c+ui!( critica+ re*+ecti!
$hink aout the structure and culture of "our compan"! or one with which "ou are familiar.
Re#iew the material in the chapter! and perhaps #isit some of the wesites identified. $hen
make notes on these
-
8/13/2019 Tugas Pengantar Manajemen Konteporer Binder1
61/196
C$A%TE& 1" ORGANISA$ION S$R1&$1R6
Further reading
3oodward! 5. -'=J! Industrial Organi7ation* $heor" and practice! Oxford 1ni#ersit" Press!
Oxford. Second edition '=>(.
0urns! $. and Stalker! G.D. -'='! $he Danagement of Inno#ation! $a#istock! 4ondon.
4awrence! P. and 4orsch! 5.3. -'=8! Organi7ation and 6n#ironment! :ar#ard 0usiness SchoolPress! 0oston! DA.
$hese influential ooks are short and accessile accounts of the research process! and it
would add to "our understanding to readat leastone of them in the original. $he second
edition of 3oodward)s ook -'=>( is e#en more useful! as it includes a commentar" on her
work " two later scholars.
9onaldson! 4. -,(('! $he &ontingenc" $heor" of Organi7ations! Sage! 4ondon.
A comprehensi#e and up%to%date account " one of the leadingscholars of contingenc"
theor". Outlines the underl"ing principles of the theor" and the contro#ersies surrounding
it! as well as offering #aluale guidance on emerging research possiilities.
Ri#ard! S.! 0enoit! A.A.! Patr"! D.! Pare! G. and Smith! :.A. -,((;! Information $echnolog" andOrgani7ational $ransformation! 6lse#ier0utterworth%:einemann! Oxford.
As well as eing the source of some information on the Oticon case! this ook includes
other examples of the wa" in which information technolog" is enaling managers to
de#elop new forms of organisation. A coherent theoretical structure makes the ook a
useful addition to this area.
3elinks
$hese wesites ha#e appeared in the chapter*
ww w .oticon.comww w.aes"stems.com
ww w.cadur"schweppes.com
ww w.philips.com
ww w .+n+.com
www.to"ota.com
ww w.unile#er.com
ww w.siemens.com
ww w.gsk.com
Kisit two of the usiness sites in the list! and na#igate to the pages dealing with corporate
news! in#estor relations or 2our compan").
3hat organisational structure issues can "ou identif" that managers in the compan" arelikel" to e dealing withC &an "ou find an" information aout their likel" culture from the
wesiteC
3hat kind of en#ironment are the" likel" to e working in! and how ma" that affect their
structure and cultureC
Annotated welinks! multiple choice
-
8/13/2019 Tugas Pengantar Manajemen Konteporer Binder1
62/196
-
8/13/2019 Tugas Pengantar Manajemen Konteporer Binder1
63/196
&hapter ''
:uman resourcemanagement
Aim
Objectives
Key terms
$o introduce the topic of human resourcemanagement and to
examine some of the ma+or practices.
0" the end of "our work on this chapter "ou should e ale to outline
the concepts elow in "our own terms and*
1 1nderstand the contriution of :RD to organisational performance
2 1nderstand the potential links etween strateg" and :RD
3 9escrie the :RD practices concerned with the flow of people into
and through the organisation
4 9escrie the :RD practices concerned with reward management
5 1nderstand how :RD aims to manage workforce di#ersit"
6 Recognise the issues "ou will face as a +o seeker at the recruitment
selection stage.
$his chapter introduces the following ideas*
human resourcemanagement
external fit
internal fit
succession planning
+o anal"sis
competencies
#alidit"selection tests
assessment centres
performance%related pa"
6ach is a term defined within the text! as well
as in the Glossar" at the end of the ook.
-
8/13/2019 Tugas Pengantar Manajemen Konteporer Binder1
64/196
0D3G
roup.
0D3 www.mwgroup.com C A S E S T U DY
0D3! whose head!((( automoiles to cus%
tomers! an increase of /.J per cent o#er the pre#ious
"ear! and at the end of that "ear 0D3 emplo"ed
'(!((( people. 3estern 6urope is its ma+or market!
accounting for J= per cent of all 0D3 cars sold -though
&hina is an increasingl" important market for luxur"
Rolls%Ro"ce #ehicles. 0D3 also manufactures motor%
c"cles and has a +oint #enture with Rolls%Ro"ce to
produce aircraft +et engines.
0D3 needs to e placed in the larger context of
com% petiti#eness in the German motor industr". A '==
report " the German Dotor Industr" Association
identified increased wage costs! higher non%wage
laour costs! shorter agreed working time than man"
competitor coun% tries and the continuing strength of
the 9eutschmark as factors undermining German
competiti#eness. $hese had lowered emplo"ment in the
industr"! stimulated in#est% ments aroad and
encouraged companies to gi#e high priorit" to
impro#ing laour producti#it".
$he strateg" of focusing on the premium end of the
car market is supported " its approach to :RD! whichderi#es from! and is highl" consistent with! the com%
pan")s 2six inner #alues)* communication! ethical
eha#iour to its staff! achie#ement and remuneration!
independence! self%fulfilment and the pursuit of new
goals. $his #alue%oriented polic" dates ack to the earl"
'=>(s! arising out of a scenario%planning exercise
among senior managers. $his underl"ing philosoph" is
important in shaping the design of an" new 0D3 plant
-2an open design) that ad#ances the #isual management
of the process and the process of introducing an" new
or reformed :RD practices. $he compan" emphasises
extensi#e consultation! information sharing and seeking
to estalish positi#e interrelationships etween indi#id%
ual changes.
Source* 6uropean Industrial Relations Re#iew! issue ,8 -'==! pp. /,@/;.
Case questi!s 11#1 3hat issues concerning the management of
people are likel" to e raised in a group such
as 0D3 that has rapidl" expanded its produc%
tion and distriution facilitiesC
:ow ha#e these issues een affected
" domestic de#elopments in
German"C
:ow is increased competition likel" to affect
the people who work for 0D3C
/J/
http://www.bmwgroup.com/http://www.bmwgroup.com/ -
8/13/2019 Tugas Pengantar Manajemen Konteporer Binder1
65/196
C$A%TE& 11 :1DAN R6SO1R&6 DANAG6D6N$
@E
Activity 11#1 De*i!i!( $&
0efore readingon! note down how "ou would define human resource management.
3hat topics and issues do "ou think it deals with! and how does it relate to
management as a wholeC ?eep "our notes " "ou and compare them with the
topics co#ered in the chapter as "ou work through it.
11#1 Introduction
$uma! resurce
ma!a(eme!t
is the effecti#e use of
human resources in
order to enhance
organisational
performance.
9M! is a large and successful business in a growing area of theworld economy & auto- mobile production. Ket it faces competitiveproblems stemming in part from high employment costs in itsDerman operations, and competition from new sources.
Management is attempting to retain the company5s position bydiversifying the product range and the number of countries in whichit manufactures. The company believes that its business strategyhas to be matched by its CM strategy & and is adapting this tobring about a better-trained and more fle%ible workforce suited to thenew conditions.
uch activities are part of a wider change taking place in manywestern companies, as managers try to align the way they dealwith people with broader company strategies. Managementinfluences other people through both personal and institutionalisedprac- tices. 't seeks to be less reactive, less focused on grievances
and the routine aspects of personnel administration. 'nstead itwants to be more proactive in developing a labour force at all levelsthat will support the organisation5s strategy. 't also seeks greatercoher- ence between the main aspects of CM & especially in theareas of selection, development, appraisal and rewards.
This chapter focuses on some institutionalised practices intendedto influence the attitudes and actions of employees. These practicesare commonly referred to as )uma! resurce ma!a(eme!t 6CM7. CMcovers four main areas 69eer et al., /@E$7
1 employee influence 6employee involvement indecision making782 work systems 6work design,
supervisory style783 human resource flow 6recruitment, selection, training,development and deployment784 reward management 6pay andother benefits7.
;mployee influence and work systems are discussed in )hapters/$ and /A. )onsequently this chapter focuses on human resourceflow and reward management. uman resource flow is concernedwith the flow of individuals into and through the organisation &human resource planning, 2ob analysis, employee recruitment and
selec- tion. Management designs these practices to help ensurethat the organisation has the right people available to help it
-
8/13/2019 Tugas Pengantar Manajemen Konteporer Binder1
66/196
6D6RG6N&6 AN9 D6ANING OF :RD
@@
achieve itslargerstrategicob2ectives.Cewardmanage-ment aims
to attract,retain andacknowledgeemployees.
Thechapterbegins bydiscussingthe basicpurpose andob2ectives of
CM, andthe reasonsfor itsgreaterprominenceinmanagementdiscussions.'t thenpresents a
range ofcurrentpractices inthe areas ofhumanresourceflow andrewardmanagement. CM ismore than a
sum ofpolicies andit isimportant tosee howthese fittogetherwithin acompany5sbroadapproach to
CM.
-
8/13/2019 Tugas Pengantar Manajemen Konteporer Binder1
67/196
11#2 6mergence and meaning of :RD
CM refers to all aspects of managing people in the workplace thissection outlines why the function has become an essentialcomponent in organisational success.
$istrica+ eve+.me!t * $&
The term 4human resource management5 is relatively new, gainingprominence in
-
8/13/2019 Tugas Pengantar Manajemen Konteporer Binder1
68/196
strategic & believing that managing people more effectively wouldimprove organisational performance. This reflected theories of sus-tained competitive advantage that emphasise the importance offirm-specific resources and competences that are difficult toimitate 6*feffer, /@@$7. Table //./ highlights the policies that arelikely to affect CM and organisational outcomes.
Case questi!s 11#2 3hen did :RD policies egin to e seriousl" de#eloped at 0D3C
3hat ledmanagement to take this initiati#eC
-
8/13/2019 Tugas Pengantar Manajemen Konteporer Binder1
69/196
%+icies $uma! resurce utcmes Or(a!isati!a+ utcmes
Or(a!isati!a+ a!
jb esi(!
:igh +o performance
a!a(i!( c)a!(e Strategic planning and
integration
:igh prolem sol#ing
&ecruitme!t se+ecti!
a! scia+isi!(
&ommitment Successful change
A..raisa+ trai!i!(
a! eve+.me!t
Flexiilit"adaptailit" 4ow turno#er
a!.er *+s t)ru()
t)e r(a!isati!
4ow asence
&ear systems Mualit" 4ow grie#ance le#el
Source* Guest-'=>8! p. J(/.
Tab+e11#1
Policies for
supporting :RD
and organisational
outcomes
Activity 11#2 Assessi!( t)e c)a!(es !eee
An organisation has decided to pursue a
-
8/13/2019 Tugas Pengantar Manajemen Konteporer Binder1
70/196
6D6RG6N&6 AN9 D6ANING OF :RD
T)e .)i+s.)y * $&
CM adopts a strategic perspective and contributes toorganisational performance by managing staff effectively. Thephilosophy through which this is pursued aims for a win& winsituation for both employer and employee8 the organisation gains
profitability and employees gain not only economically but alsointrinsically through having a satisfying and challenging 2ob. Thisassumes that employees and employer share the same goal & thelong-term success of the organisation. This unitary view 6see)hapter "7 is widely held by the management community 6Deare etal., "##07 and can be contrasted with the pluralist view, whichrecognises the legitimacy of different views & between trade unions,between managerial functions, and between managers and tradeunions.
: distinction within CM itself is between 4hard5 and 4soft5approaches 6torey, /@@", pp. "0&"E8 Hegge, /@@A, pp. 00&0(7. The
former takes a business-led perspective, while the latter seespeople as valuable assets whose motivation, involvement anddevelopment should have priority. :nother theme is that if CM isto support performance, manage- ment needs to balance e%ternaland internal fit 69eer and pector, /@EA7.
E9ter!a+ *