Tu3_T03_5_ChangIGARSS2011.pdf
Transcript of Tu3_T03_5_ChangIGARSS2011.pdf
!
Tropical Cyclone Observa2ons with Aircra7 Passive and Ac2ve
Microwave Instruments
Paul Chang and Zorana Jelenak, NOAA/NESDIS/STAR James Carswell, Remote Sensing Solu2ons
Stephen Frasier, University of MassachuseLs
IGARSS 2011 -‐ 26 July 2011 1
!
Mo2va2on Stepped Frequency Microwave Radiometer (SFMR) • Deployed on NOAA research and 53rd Air Force Reserve Weather reconnaissance aircra7.
• Provides cri2cal wind speed observa2ons of tropical cyclone environment to forecasters for wind radii es2ma2on.
• Provides “surface truth” for geophysical model func2on development and valida2on.
Problem: • SFMR under es2mates precipita2on rate within TCs … • Retrieved wind speed and rain rate errors correlated … • Thus wind speed error depends on environment in field of view (i.e. precipita2on).
IGARSS 2011 -‐ 26 July 2011 2
!
Measurement Geometry
IGARSS 2011 -‐ 26 July 2011 3
Specifica2ons
Frequency: C-‐band & Ku-‐band Polariza2on: VV, HH Beam Incidence Angles: 30, 35, 41.5, 50 Al2tude Range: 500 – 8000 m Range Resolu2on: 15, 30, 60 & 120 m
Propor2onally not to scale.
Conical Scan (60 rpm)
IWRAP: Simultaneous, Mul2-‐Beam Doppler/Reflec2vity Profiling
SFMR foot print
SFMR column (20-28 deg)
• SFMR • Nadir Viewing. • C-band – 6 channels. • ~4.7 to 7.2 GHz.
• IWRAP • C/Ku-band Doppler Radar. • Conical scanning. • Four beams. • 20 to 55 degrees incidence. • 30-m range gates.
• NOAA Tail Doppler Radar • X-band. • Helix scan fore/aft 20 deg. • 75-m range gates.
• NOAA Lower Fuselage Radar • C-band (~5.3 GHz) • Reflectivity. • Near grazing conical scanning.
• Not to scale • NOAA Tail Doppler Radar & Lower Fuselage Radar beams not shown
!
SFMR Tb Geophysical Model Func2on (GMF)
IGARSS 2011 -‐ 26 July 2011 4
Tb Versus U10N & Frequency Tb Versus Rain Rate & Frequency
3 km al2tude, 28oC SST 3 km al2tude, 28oC SST
!
Rain Rate Under Es2mated
• Corrected SFMR Rain Rate = 2.5 x SFMR Rain Rate – 5 mm/hr. • Figures from [Esteban Fernandez, 2005]; UMass SFMR – 2003 flights.
IGARSS 2011 -‐ 26 July 2011 5
IWRAP derived aLenua2on ploLed versus SFMR rain rate retrievals.
!
Rain Rate Under Es2mated by SFMR
IGARSS 2011 -‐ 26 July 2011 6
• SFMR under predicts rain rate by a factor of 2.5
• SFMR rain rate es2mates are biased by ~ 5 mm/hr.
• Same results observed in 2003 comparison between IWRAP and UMass SFMR.
• Comparisons with Tail Doppler and Lower Fuselage radars show same 5 mm/hr bias and SFMR under es2mates rain rate.
* NOAA Aircra7 Opera2ons Center SFMR
!
New SFMR Absorp2on Model
IGARSS 2011 -‐ 26 July 2011 7
( )( )eeFrm R
rRR RfK α=
Re Fe Rm Slope (m) Offset (b) 0.76 0.0676 2.75 0.947 0.110 0.74 0.0696 2.75 0.950 0.138 0.74 0.0716 2.8 0.900 0.015 0.72 0.0736 2.8 0.910 -0.109 0.7 0.0756 2.8 0.915 -0.074
SFMR Absorption Model
* Minimized offset and required slope > .85
Monte-Carlo: Clustered Solutions
Current Model
Monte- Carlo
Solutions
!
New SFMR Absorp2on Model
IGARSS 2011 -‐ 26 July 2011 8
Old SFMR Model New SFMR Model
SFMR Tb data from Uhlhorn, et al, 2007: Hurricane Surface Wind Measurements from an Operational Stepped Frequency Microwave Radiometer. Monthly Weather Review, v.135, pp. 3070–3085.
!
New SFMR Absorp2on Model – IWRAP Comparison
• IWRAP C-‐band reflec2vity factor measurements.
• SFMR rain rate derived using new absorp2on model.
• Solid black line is opera2onal Z-‐R model for tropical cyclones.
• Red line is fit to data solving for exponent only.
• Green line is fit to data solving for exponent and mul2plier.
IGARSS 2011 -‐ 26 July 2011 9
* 2008 IWRAP and SFMR measurements from hurricane season.
IWRAP Z measurements versus SFMR Rain Rate Retrievals
!
Wind Speed and Rain Rate Retrieval Errors
IGARSS 2011 -‐ 26 July 2011 10
!
Summary
IGARSS 2011 -‐ 26 July 2011 11
• SFMR rain rate retrievals have been documented to under predict the rain rate in tropical cyclones.
• New absorption GMF developed for SFMR for 2005 data set.
• SFMR wind speed retrievals compared with GPS drop sondes winds improves with new SFMR absorption model.
• SFMR rain rate – IWRAP reflectivity factor comparison improves with new SFMR absorption model.
!
Ques2ons?
IGARSS 2011 -‐ 26 July 2011 12
THANK YOU