TTC Board – April 25, 2013€¦ · • Ease of hearing announcements on streetcars Areas of...
Transcript of TTC Board – April 25, 2013€¦ · • Ease of hearing announcements on streetcars Areas of...
2012 CUSTOMER SATISFACTION SURVEY TTC Board – April 25, 2013
2
OUTLINE
• Background and methodology • Respondent profile • Overview of results • Next steps
3
CUSTOMER SATISFACTION SURVEY -OBJECTIVES
• Measure customer satisfaction with TTC service performance on a number of key attributes
• Track changes in customer satisfaction over time
• Use results as input to assess current service/initiatives, and to identify priorities for future action
4
CUSTOMER SATISFACTION SURVEY - OVERVIEW
• Respondents rate quality of key aspects of TTC service, and also for each mode they used on their last trip
• 12 station and 10 vehicle attributes:
Station:
Cleanliness Ease of hearing announcements Helpfulness of announcements Maps/signs at station Personal safety in station Ease of getting to platform Ease of buying token / ticket Value for Money Platform crowding Station staff available when needed Help and appearance of staff around station Help and appearance of collector booth
Vehicle:
Cleanliness Ease of hearing announcements Helpfulness of announcements Maps/information Personal safety on vehicle Crowding Length of journey Length of time waited for vehicle Smoothness of ride Help and Appearance of Operator
5
BACKGROUND AND METHODOLOGY
Method 10 minute telephone survey
Respondents C ity of Toronto residents From 13 years to 70 years of age T TC user at least once every few weeks or more frequently
Timing Wave 1: April 2012 Wave 2: July 2012
Wave 3: September 2012 Wave 4: December 2012
Sample Size Wave 1: n = 551 Wave 2: n = 1100
Wave 3: n = 1000 Wave 4: n = 1000
RESPONDENT PROFILE
7
RESPONDENT PROFILE – WAVE 4 2012
FREQUENCY OF TTC USAGE MODE OF TRANSPORTATION OF MOST RECENT TRIP ON TTC
PURPOSE OF LAST TTC TRIP PURCHASE METHOD
Adult Monthly Metropass= 26%
Token=41%
SUMMARY OF RESULTS
9
SUMMARY OF RESULTS
Overall customer satisfaction declined during 2012 •
77% in Wave 1 to 72% Wave 4
Some indices demonstrate positive trends in Wave 4, such as: • Subway/streetcar vehicle cleanliness • Ease of hearing streetcar announcements
Areas of highest customer satisfaction include (+80% Wave 4): • Quality of subway announcements at each stop • Personal safety while travelling on subway, bus, streetcar • Bus operator appearance • Ease of hearing announcements on streetcars
Areas of lowest customer satisfaction include (≤55% Wave 4): • Level of crowding in subway/bus/streetcar vehicles • Helpfulness/clarify of subway announcements about delays • Length of time waited for bus/streetcar • Maps and information inside bus/streetcar
Approximately 90% of customers perceived ‘value for money’ as average or better
RATINGS OF OVERALL TTC SERVICE
11
OVERALL SATISFACTION RATINGS - 2012
Q10. How satisfied were you overall with the quality of the TTC’s service on the last TTC trip you took, on a scale of 1 to 10 where 10 is extremely satisfied and 1 is extremely dissatisfied? How would you rate the service on a scale of 1 to 10 for your last trip?
16% 16% 17% 18%
7% 9% 9% 10%
77% 75% 74% 72%
Wave 1 April 2012
(n=551)
Wave 2 July 2012(n=1100)
Wave 3 September 2012
(n=1000)
Wave 4December 2012
(n=1000)
Good/ Excellent (7-10) Middling/ No Opinion (5,6,DK) Poor (1-4)
SUBWAY STATIONS – KEY RESULTS
13
TTC SUBWAY STATION –KEY RESULTS
TTC VEHICLE AND SERVICE – KEY RESULTS
15
VEHICLES - WAIT TIME
16
VEHICLES –JOURNEY TIME
17
VEHICLES - CROWDING
18
VEHICLES - CLEANLINESS
19
VEHICLES – MAPS AND INFORMATION
20
VEHICLES – PERSONAL SAFETY
OTHER KEY RESULTS
Excellent Value Good Value Average Value Below Average Value Poor Value
22
PERCEIVED VALUE FOR MONEY IS CONSISTENT THROUGHOUT 2012
Q17. On you last TTC trip would you say you received ____ [READ LIST] for your money?
23
TTC ADVOCATES
• ≈ 25% of respondents are strong TTC and transit supporters • Rate TTC a 9 or 10 on overall satisfaction, and pride
in TTC and its meaning to Toronto
• TTC advocates tend to be older, and have higher % of females than other survey respondents
• Opportunity to build upon this solid foundation • Monitor changes to size of group over time
24
NEXT STEPS
• Continue Customer Satisfaction Survey in 2014 • Update key measures in CEO report on quarterly
basis • Report back to Board twice a year
QUESTIONS?
BACKGROUND
27
RATINGS OF SUBWAY SERVICE DELIVERY
% TOP 4 BOX RATINGS OF OVERALL SATISFACTION
% TOP 4 BOX (RATING 7-10)
April 2012 (A)
July 2012 (B)
Sept 2012 (C)
Dec 2012 (D)
n= 421 844 741 752
Com
fort
and
Con
veni
ence
The length of time your subway trip took 78% 81% 74% 79% C
The length of time you waited for the vehicle 72% 71% 74% 70%
The smoothness / lack of jolting during the subway trip 70% 72% 67% 69%
Crowding on train platform 60% 62% 51% 57% C
The level of crowding inside the vehicle 56% 55% 45% 50% AB
RATINGS OF SUBWAY SERVICE DELIVERY (CON’T)
28
% TOP 4 BOX RATINGS OF OVERALL SATISFACTION
TOP 4 BOX (RATING 7-10)
April 2012 (A)
July 2012 (B)
Sept 2012 (C)
Dec 2012 (D)
n=
421 844 741 752
Info
rmat
ion/
Cle
anlin
ess/
Hel
pful
ness
The maps and information inside the vehicle 76% 77% 76% 75%
Ease of buying token/ticket 74% 76% 73% 69% AB
Helpfulness of maps and signs at station 73% 74% 72% 71%
Cleanliness/lack of litter inside vehicle 63% 66% 67% 69% A
Cleanliness of the subway station 59% 63% 72% 66% A
Appearance of collector booth 60% 64% 56% 63% C
Helpfulness and appearance of station staff 62% 63% 51% 59% C
RATINGS OF SUBWAY SERVICE DELIVERY (CON’T)
29
% TOP 4 BOX RATINGS OF OVERALL SATISFACTION
TOP 4 BOX (RATING 7-10)
April 2012 (A)
July 2012 (B)
Sept 2012 (C)
Dec 2012 (D)
n=
421 844 741 752
Anno
unce
men
ts
The quality of announcements of each stop 84% 84% 84% 85%
Helpfulness of announcements 66% 65% 56% 63% C
Frequency of announcements about any delays 64% 66% 54% 61% C
Ease of hearing announcements in the station 59% 55% 57% 57%
Helpfulness of announcements about delays 58% 59% 52% 55%
Clarity of announcements about any delays 54% 54% 49% 53%
RATINGS OF SUBWAY SERVICE DELIVERY (CON’T)
30
% TOP 4 BOX RATINGS OF OVERALL SATISFACTION
% TOP 4 BOX (RATING 7-10)
April 2012 (A)
July 2012 (B)
Sept 2012 (C)
Dec 2012 (D)
n=
421
844 741 752
Pers
onal
Saf
ety
Your personal safety during the subway trip 93% 89% 86% 91% C
Personal safety in station 88% 85% 85% 84%
31
RATINGS OF BUS SERVICE DELIVERY
% TOP 4 BOX RATINGS OF OVERALL SATISFACTION
% TOP 4 BOX (RATING 7-10)
April 2012 (A)
July 2012 (B)
Sept 2012 (C)
Dec 2012 (D)
n= 329 645 594 648
Com
fort
and
Con
veni
ence
The length of time your bus trip took 78% 75% 70% 74%
The cleanliness/lack of litter inside the vehicle 67% 69% 62% 66%
The smoothness / lack of jolting during the bus trip 65% 64% 63% 62%
The level of crowding inside the vehicle 63% 53% 55% 53% A
The length of time you waited for the vehicle 56% 53% 52% 53%
RATINGS OF BUS SERVICE DELIVERY (CON’T)
32
% TOP 4 BOX RATINGS OF OVERALL SATISFACTION
% TOP 4 BOX (RATING 7-10)
April 2012 (A)
July 2012 (B)
Sept 2012 (C)
Dec 2012 (D)
n= 329 645 594 648
Anno
unce
men
ts a
nd
In
form
atio
n
Ease of hearing announcements 84% 80% 79% 79%
Helpfulness of announcements 82% 79% 78% 79%
The maps and information inside the vehicle 52% 49% 48% 50%
Safe
ty a
nd
Serv
icea
bilit
y
Your personal safety during the bus trip 86% 87% 86% 87%
Appearance of operator 86% 85% 80% 80% AB
Helpfulness of operator 79% 76% 74% 72% A
33
RATINGS OF STREETCAR SERVICE DELIVERY
% TOP 4 BOX RATINGS OF OVERALL SATISFACTION
% TOP 4 BOX (RATING 7-10)
April 2012 (A)
July 2012 (B)
Sept 2012 (C)
Dec 2012 (D)
n= 123 239 224 216
Com
fort
and
C
onve
nien
ce The length of time your streetcar trip took 76% 72% 64% 75% C
The level of crowding inside the vehicle 57% 55% 51% 55%
The length of time you waited for the vehicle 54% 59% 47% 54%
Hel
p a
nd In
form
atio
n
Ease of hearing announcements 72% 79% 71% 80% C
Helpfulness of announcements 73% 75% 70% 77%
The maps and information inside the vehicle
47% 49% 47% 41%
RATINGS OF STREETCAR SERVICE DELIVERY (CON’T)
34
% TOP 4 BOX RATINGS OF OVERALL SATISFACTION
% TOP 4 BOX (RATING 7-10)
April 2012 (A)
July 2012 (B)
Sept 2012 (C)
Dec 2012 (D)
n= 123 239 224 216
Safe
ty a
nd S
ervi
ceab
ility
Your personal safety during the streetcar trip 88% 89% 83% 83%
Appearance of operator 82% 81% 75% 78%
The smoothness / lack of jolting during the streetcar trip 75% 72% 69% 75%
Helpfulness of operator 74% 76% 68% 71%
The cleanliness/lack of litter inside the vehicle 63% 68% 58% 70% C