Trust, Risk and Alternative Website Quality in B-Buyer ...
Transcript of Trust, Risk and Alternative Website Quality in B-Buyer ...
DOI: 10.4018/JGIM.2020010109
Journal of Global Information ManagementVolume 28 • Issue 1 • January-March 2020
Copyright©2020,IGIGlobal.CopyingordistributinginprintorelectronicformswithoutwrittenpermissionofIGIGlobalisprohibited.
167
Trust, Risk and Alternative Website Quality in B-Buyer Acceptance of Cross-Border E-CommerceJian Mou, Xidian University, Xi’an, China
Yi Cui, Communication University of China, Beijing, China
Kerry Kurcz, University of Illinois at Chicago, Chicago, USA
ABSTRACT
Cross-bordere-commerce(CBEC)hasbecomeanimperativemodeforglobaltrade.Researchoncross-bordere-commercehistoricallyfocusesmainlyonthecustomer’sbehaviorintentiontopurchaseonaCBECplatform.However,B-buyersaremoreimportantcomparedwithC-buyersforCBECplatforms.ThisisbecauseB-buyerscancontributemoregrossmerchandisevolume(GMV)inaCBECplatform,andthusmoremarginforthefirm.Theauthorsapplytrusttransfertheory,perceivedrisk,andalternativewebsitequalitytostudyrepurchaseintention,focusingonB-buyers.Theresultsshowthatperceivedrisk,trustinprovider,andtrustinthewebsiteaffectrepurchaseintentionsignificantly,wheretrustinwebsiteisfoundtobethemostimportantfactor.Inaddition,theauthorsfoundthatthedimensionsofperceivedriskinCBECcontextcanbeclassifiedasthefollowing:customerdutiesrisk,confiscationrisk,deliveryrisk,financialrisk,andprivacyrisk.Thecontributionsofthestudyareaddressedlastly.
KEyWoRdSB-Buyers, CBEC, Cross-Border E-Commerce, Perceived Risk, Repurchase Intention, Trust
INTRodUCTIoN
Withtheflourishofinternettechnology,informationtechnology,logisticservicesandglobalizationofworldtrade,e-consumerstendtolookbeyondtheirborders.Globale-commercesalesreached6.3trillionyuan(about914billionU.S.dollars)in2016alone,basedonthedatafromtheMinistryofCommerce(MinistryofCommerce,2017).ResearchreportsfromiResearch(2017),aprofessionalconsultancycompanyconcentratingononlinemediaande-commerce,alsopredictthatthistotalturnoverwillnearlydoubleto12trillionyuan(about1.74trillionU.S.dollars)by2020.Bythattime,39%oftheworld’sentiree-commercemarketwillbecontrolledbytraditionalmarketplaces,and53%ofcross-bordersellersintheUSwilluseonlinemarketplaces.Suchrapiddevelopmentindicates the immensepotentialandopportunityofcross-bordere-commerce (CBEC) forglobaleconomicstogrowinthenearfuture.Therefore,CBECresearchplaysanimportantroleforeconomicdevelopment-globally.GiventheimportanceofCBEC,understandinganddedicatingspecialattentiontothefactorsthatinfluencebuyers’behaviorisessentialforanycompanywhowishestosurviveandthriveamongtheexponentialtrendsofglobalization.
Manystudieshaveshowntrustispriorityinthesettingofanye-commerce.However,inCBEC,trustbecomesevenmorecrucialduetothe“distance”betweenbuyersandsellers,where“distance”
Thisarticle,originallypublishedunderIGIGlobal’scopyrightonOctober4,2019willproceedwithpublicationasanOpenAccessarticlestartingonJanuary11,2021inthegoldOpenAccessjournal,JournalofGlobalInformationManagement(convertedtogoldOpenAccess
January1,2021),andwillbedistributedunderthetermsoftheCreativeCommonsAttributionLicense(http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/)whichpermitsunrestricteduse,distribution,andproductioninanymedium,providedtheauthoroftheoriginalworkandoriginal
publicationsourceareproperlycredited.
Journal of Global Information ManagementVolume 28 • Issue 1 • January-March 2020
168
hasbeenrecognizedaslanguagebarriers,legalsystemsbarrier,timebarrier,deliveryservices,aswellascustomsregulations(Kim,Dekker,&Heij,2017).Althoughmulti-dimensionaltrusthasbeeninvestigatedinthee-commercesetting,thereisalackofevidenceintheeffectofmulti-dimensionaltrustintheCBECcontext.CBECisdifferentfromdomestice-commerce.Thesedifferencesmainlyreveal additional trade costs and risks from cross-border transport, import tariffs, differences intechnical standards, poor institutional quality and weak contract enforcement (Gomez-Herrera,Martens,&Turlea,2014).
GiventhecomplexnatureofCBEC,itsbuyersaremorelikelytoperceiverisks.Multiplefactorriskshavebeenconsideredinthedomestice-commercesetting(e.g.,Tandon,Kiran,&Sah,2018;Marriott&Williams,2018),albeitriskssuchascustomerdutiesrisk,confiscationrisk,deliveryriskhaveyet tobedeeplyinvestigatedinCBEC.Therefore,understandingperceivedriskinstudyingCBECisnecessary.Furthermore,mostexistingresearchfocusesonC-buyers,whileB-buyersaremore important forCBECplatform.This isbecauseB-buyerscancontributemoremargin forafirm(Kraemer,Gibbs,&Dedrick,2005). In this research,B-buyers refer tocustomerswhobuyproductsorservicesforthecompanyorworkplacewithwhichtheybelong.Infact,B2Ctransactionshavedevelopedrapidlyinrecentyearsduetotheconvenienceofhighdiscounts.Meanwhile,B2BtransactionsaregrowingfourtimesfasterthantheirB2Ccounterpart(Vakeel,Das,Udo,&Bagchi,2017).However,andperhapsmostimportantly,ithasbeenproventhatB-buyerscontributemoreGrossMerchandiseVolume(GMV)inCBECplatforms.ComparedtoB2Ce-commerce,B2Be-commerceisalessresearchedareawithsignificantdifferenceabouttransactionvolume,averagetransactionamount,logistics,customersegments,fulfilmentissues,andadvertisementobjectives(Vakeeletal.,2017).AnotherconvenientcharacteristicofB-buyersisthattheyaremorelikelytotransactwiththeirprevious sellers,with the same items, in largevolumes.Meanwhile,Kraemeret al. (2005)emphasizedthatforB2Be-commerce,highlyglobalcompaniesutilizetheInternetmorethantheirlessglobalcounterparts,whereasforB2Ce-commercetheoppositeistrue.Thisisbecauseglobalcompaniesfocusmoreonwholesalebrokerageactivityindifferentcountriesacrossvariousstagesofanindustry’svaluechain,whilelessglobalcompaniesfocusingontheretailbrokerageindustryarelessaffectedbyglobalization,andthusremainlocal.
SinceB-buyersaremorelikelytopurchaseproductsinawholesalesetting,alternativequalitysuch as service quality and system quality are more important for B-buyers. Furthermore, theynormallyqueryseveralCBECplatformsamongmultiplesellers,seekingoutthelowestpricefordozensofproducts.Foranytypeofconsumer,alternativewebsitequalitycanmakeallthedifferenceinswitchingbehaviorandtrustinthatwebsite(Sørum,2015;Kalia,Arora,&Kumalo,2016).CBECplatformsconstantlyneedtoimprovetheirqualityofproducts-whilekeepingpriceslow--andattractmoreinternationalbuyerswiththeopportunityofpromotionaldays(suchasChristmasorBlackFriday).Indeed,theperceptionsrisingfromalternativeplatformsistobeamongthetopprioritiesregardingCBECresearch.
Ingeneral,thispaperaimstointegrateperceivedriskandalternativewebsitequalitytounderstandthecrucialtrust-buildingmechanismforpromotingrepurchasebehavioraswellasenhancingCBECplatformloyalty.Moreover,thispaperstrivestobridgethegapbetweentrustandCBECwiththeantecedentsoftrust,andtouncoverwhysomeCBECplatformssucceed,whileothersdonot(aswithMetao.com,whichwillseelater).Thesefindingsmayhelpresearcherstoextendtheirstudiesand,ofcourse,practitionerstomaketheirwebsitemoreattractivetobuyers.Thesepointsaresummedupwiththefollowingresearchquestion:
RQ: Will alterative website quality, perceived risk and trust jointly affect the consumer’srepurchaseintentioninCBEC?
The structureof this study is organized as follows: the first section reviewsexistingCBECliteratureandthecurrenttheoreticalbackground;sectiontwodemonstratesthedevelopmentoftheresearchmodelandhypothesis;thisisfollowedbythedesignofthisstudy;thentheresearchresults;last,thepaperconcludeswithdiscussions,contributionsandlimitations.
Journal of Global Information ManagementVolume 28 • Issue 1 • January-March 2020
169
LITERATURE REVIEW ANd HyPoTHESIS dEVELoPMENT
Cross-Border E-commerceCBEC generally refers to transactions among different countries or customs areas through ane-commerceplatformandcross-borderlogistics(Tmogroup,2015).Itisacommontrendinmoderne-commercebusiness,especiallyforsmallandmediumenterprises(SMEs),becauseitcanreducetradebarriersandpromotetradegrowthinanotherwiselimitedmarketplace(Terzi,2011).Sellers,manufacturers,andallparticipantsofCBECcanprofitfromCBECduetothelargeproductassortmentwithlowcosts;thisincludes,perhapsespecially,buyers(Kimetal.,2017).ThereareseveralstudiesfocusingonthefactorsofCBECsuccess.Forexample,cross-borderpayments(Ai,Yang,&Wang,2016),logisticinfrastructureanddevelopment(Cho&Lee,2017),andculturaladaption(Sinkovics,Mo,&Hossinger,2007)haveeachbeeninvestigatedasimperativefactorsofCBECsuccess.HuangandChang(2017)alsoillustratedthefactorsthataffectconsumers’intentiontopurchaseitemsbehindtheperspectiveofperceivedtrustandvalueaspects. Inaddition,Guoetal. (2018)demonstratedthatsellers’trustinbuyersandperceivedriskofchargebackfraudarealsocrucialtothesuccessofCBEC.Meanwhile,itisimportanttonotethereareknownrisksposedtobuyers,suchasinformationasymmetry,privateinformationmisuse,andotheruncertaintyrelatedtotransactionsandproducts(Mou,Cohen,Dou,&Zhang,2017).
CBECinChinahasbecomethemajorwayofforeigntradewithgrowthrateofsixteentimesthatcomparingtogeneraltrade.ThemainmodeisB2Be-commerce,whichaccountsfor88%ofallCBEC(Xue,Li,&Pei,2016).Moreover,theChineseCBECretailexportsaccountfor37%oftheglobalmarketshare,whichmaybecausedbytwomajormanufacturingcapacityadvantages.FirstisChina’sadvantageofbeinga“worldfactory”1andsecond,thetransformationinrecentyearsto“createinChina”ratherthan“madeinChina.”TheseachievementsattributetothesupportivepolicyofChinasuchas“internet+”(Wang,Zhang,&Sun,2017)and“theBeltandRoadInitiativeproject”2(Li&Chan,2016).Despitethisgeneralsuccess,manycross-bordere-marketplaceshavefailedinrecentyearsduetopoorperformance(Thitimajshima,Esichaikul,&Krairit,2018).Forexample,Metao.com,foundedin2013,quicklywentbankruptby2016.ItcanbearguedthatMetao.comdidnotunderstanditsownmarketplace,henceitsdemise.Therefore,itisimportanttostudyCBECtounderstandwhyitsucceedsandwhyitmightnot,inordertodrivemoredirectlytowardsuccess.
The Relationship Between Trust and Repurchase IntentionTrust is formed by indicators from various formations, including trust feature signals, symbols,orcuesprovidedbytrustees(Mou&Shin,2018).Itcanalsobereferredtoasthewillingnessofonetobevulnerabletotheactionsofanother(Mayer,Davis,&Schoorman,1995).Inaphysicalstore,trustisgenerallybuiltbythesalespersonandtheappearanceofthestore(Doney&Cannon,1997).Circumstanceschangewhenthestoreisonline.Withoutthephysicalentityofthestoreitself,uncertaintyincreases.Customerscannotfeelthe“store”bysensesdirectly,andtheantecedentsoftrustarereplacedbybothperceivedwebsitequalityandtrust-relatedstatementsprovidedbye-vendorsorplatforms(Kraemeretal.,2005).Becausetrustcanhelptoreducefearsandworries(Lu,Yang,Chau,&Cao,2011),itiscrucialintheuncertainsettingofCBEC(Kimetal.,2017).Naturally,thebesttrustishighandsteady.Thus,CBECplatformsmustasserttheirwebsitequalityismaximized,e-vendorandplatformstatementsclean,andbothconsistentlymonitoredforanythingthatcouldbeperceivedasnegativeorriskyfromthebuyerperspective.
Empirical evidence suggests that trust directly influences the purchase intention of onlinecustomers(Kraemeretal.,2005;Mou,Shin,&Cohen,2017).ForB-buyers,thetransactionsarealwaysmorefrequentandinlargescale,whichfacilitatestheformationoflong-termrelationshipswithvendors.Thus,inthisrelationshipbetweenB-buyerandvendor,trustandcommitmenttogetherwillmaintaincooperationandencourageanorganicandloyalrelationship(Li,Browne,&Wetherbe,2006).Moreover,thetheoryofreasonedaction,whichsuggeststhatindividual’sbeliefsinfluence
Journal of Global Information ManagementVolume 28 • Issue 1 • January-March 2020
170
behavior intention,naturallyprovidesa foundation for the relationshipbetween trustbeliefsandintentionbehavior(Fishbein&Ajzen,1975).Inthisstudy,theauthorsclassifytrustasboththatintheproviderandinthewebsite.TrustintheprovidercanenhancetherelationshipbetweenB-buyerswithaspecificvendor,whereasCBECwebsitemayreliableandownthefunctionalitythatthebuyersneeded,andthereforepromoterepurchaseintention.Thus,theauthorshypothesisthat:
H1:Trustinproviderpositivelyaffectsrepurchaseintention.H2:Trustinwebsitepositivelyaffectsrepurchaseintention.
The Relationship Between Perceived Risk and Repurchase IntentionPerceived risk describes the customers’ behavioral tendency of reducing and minimizing anyexpected negative effects associated with purchase activity (Peter & Tarpey, 1975). It has beenconsideredamajorbarrierforonlineconsumerstomakeanonlinetransaction.Varioustypesofriskinmarketresearchhavebeenidentified,including,butnotlimitedtofinancial,time,performance,physical, social, and psychological, (Tandon, Kiran, & Sah, 2018; Marriott & Williams, 2018).Financialriskreferstoanymonetarylossthroughtechnicalormarketingchannels,suchassystemerrorcausedmultiplepurchase,sellers’fraudbehavior,orreturnbarriers.Thismonetarylossmayincludeopportunitycost,time,orboth.(Bhatnagar,Misra,&Rao,2000).Whenacustomerdecidestopurchaseonline,ahighperceivedriskmayinfluencehimorhertoceasethetransaction,oreventobereluctanttoshopinthefirstplace(Antony,Lin,&Xu,2006).Thisriskdoesnotexistinatraditionalbrick-and-mortarretailstore(e.g.Tesco,Walmart),wherecustomerscaneasilyaccesstheproducttheywant,andtouch,feel,eventrytheproductbeforetheymaketheirdecision.Indeed,asthedistancebetweenbuyersandproductsdecreases,sodoestheperceivedrisk(Kraemeretal.,2005).
Despite the varying distance between domestic and international e-commerce, product riskisgenerallythesameinbothsituations.However,CBECfacesmorechallengesintheprocessoftransactions.First,customsdutiesandtaxesareoneofthemostdistinctandmajorbarriersinCBEC(Turban et al., 2017). Because B-buyers commonly order products in a large volume and morefrequently,thesebarriersaremorerelevantforB2Bcustomers.Thesecostsmayalsoincludetaxescomingfromthebuyer’sowncountry.Meanwhile,itisimportanttonotethatproductsinlargequantityareoftensubjecttospecificcustomschecks(Sinkovicsetal.,2007),whichleadstothesecondpoint:confiscationriskmayoccurduetoeitherthevulnerabilityofcross-bordertransactionsorproblemsrelatedtopotentialshippingandcustoms,namelyforproductsinlargequantity.Further,thegreaterthedistance,themoredeliverytimeisimpliedtheprobabilityoflossordamageincreases.Therefore,delivery risk ismore serious inCBEC thandomestic e-commerce. In addition, large-scaleB2BtransactionsinCBECmustbeawareofexchangeratefluctuations(apartfromthefinancialriskswhichappearindomestice-commerce).Infact,exchangeratefluctuationisthemainpotentialrisk.
Priorstudiesofe-commercealreadyshowthatperceivedrisknegativelyaffectsaconsumer’sintention to purchase (Kraemer et al., 2005; Kuan & Bock, 2007), but the authors believe thisrelationshipwillbeamplifiedinCBEC,especiallyforB2B,andthereismoretobesaidonthesubject.Thus,thefollowinghypothesishasbeenproposed:
H3:Perceivedrisknegativelyaffectsaconsumer’sintentiontorepurchaseonline.
The Relationship Between Perceived Risk and TrustAccordingtotheextendedvalenceframework(Kraemeretal.,2005),thenetvalencegeneratedbyperceivedbenefitandperceivedriskiscrucialduringtheprocessofmakingapurchasedecision.Asdescribedabove,perceivedriskisthemainbarrierinCBEC.Therefore,whentheuncertaintyorriskappears,theremustbeacomplementtoneutralizetherisk:trustisthatcomplement(Kim,Ferrin,&Rao,2009).Newresearchsupplementsthatwhichhasshownthenegativeeffectsoftrust
Journal of Global Information ManagementVolume 28 • Issue 1 • January-March 2020
171
onperceivedriskine-commerce.Thisresearchsuggeststrustcouldbeanantecedentofrisk,thesameasrisk,oraby-productofrisk—butallinall,theyaredifferentconcepts(Kraemeretal.,2005).AsdescribedbyMayeretal.(1995),trustisconstitutedbythreecharacteristics:ability,benevolence,andintegrity.Abilityisdefinedasthecompetenceorbeliefsthatsomeoneiscapableofdoingwhatisexpected(Hallikainen&Laukkanen,2018).Benevolencereferstothebeliefthatatrusteewantstodogoodtothetrustor,asidefromanegocentricprofitmotive(Mayeretal.,1995;Hong,2018).Integrityrefers to thebelief thatacompanywillact inaconsistent, reliable,andhonestmannerwhenfulfillingitspromises(Hong,2018).Collectively,Hallikainen,Laukkanen,andHongassertthatifatrustorperceivesatrusteewithenoughofthesekeycharacteristics,trustwillbedeveloped.Therefore,consumerswouldliketoengageinariskyrelationshipwithavenderifandonlyifthetrustexceedsthethresholdofperceivedrisk.Inotherwords,trusthasaninverserelationshipwithperceivedrisk.However,thisstudiesshowthatthefunctionoftrustinaffectingbehaviorintention(e.g.repurchase)isthesameasrisk,andtheireffectmechanismsare,tosomedegree,areciprocal.Inmobilecommercecontext (Lin,Wang,Wang,&Lu,2014),perceivedriskcanbereducedbypre-trust,andhaveafunctionofdecreasingpost-trust.Further,inanonlineenvironment,empiricalevidenceshowsthatriskperceptionscannegativelyinfluencemulti-dimensionaltrust(Treiblmaier&Chong,2011).Therefore,ifB-buyersinCBECperceivedlowerriskeitherfromvendorsortheCBECplatformwebsite,theywillreducetheirworryandfears,andbecomemorerisktolerant.Thismakessense,consideringtheytrusttheirsuppliers.Thus,theauthorshypothesisthat:
H4:Perceivedrisknegativelyaffectsbuyers’trustinproviders.H5:Perceivedrisknegativelyaffectsbuyers’trustinCBECwebsites.
The Relationship Between Alternative Website Quality and TrustAmongnumerousCBECplatforms,buyerscaneasilyswitch theirchoice throughasingleclick.Accordingtotheinformationsystemsuccessmodel(DeLone&McLean,2003),thequalityofaninformationsystemisconstitutedbysystemquality,informationquality,andservicequality.Inthecontextofthisstudy,theauthorsrefertoalternativewebsitequalityastheproductqualityandpricebuyersperceiveofotherCBECplatforms.Alternativequalityisidentifiedasakeyfactortoformandstabilizecooperativerelationships(McKnight,Choudhury,&Kacmar,2002).IfconsumerneedscanbebettersatisfiedbyanotherCBECplatform,thecommitmentofthecurrentrelationshipwillbereducedandeasilyreplaced.Conversely,ifconsumersfacepoor,unstable,unsuitablealternativesorevenjustnotasgoodasthecurrent,theyaremorelikelytostayfirmlywithinthepresentrelationship.Empiricalevidencehasshownthatthequalityofoutcomeavailablefromthebestalternativerelationshippartnercanhelptomaintainabuyer-sellerrelationshipinthecontextofB2B(Anderson&Narus,1990).Inpractice,ifbuyersfindanother,betterCBECplatformwebsite,theytendtodevaluetheoldoneandbecomereluctanttomaintaintherelationship(Johnson&Rusbult,1989).Therefore,itmayreducethetrustofthecurrentwebsitealongwiththeirprovider.Thus,theauthorshypothesisthefollowing:
H6:Alternativewebsitequalitynegativelyaffectsbuyers’trustinproviders.H7:Alternativewebsitequalitynegativelyaffectsbuyers’trustinCBECwebsites.
The Relationship Between Alternative Website Quality and RiskTherearemanyaspectsassociatedwithalternativewebsitequality.OtherthantheISqualitiesdiscussedearlier,otherfactorsalsorevolvearoundalternativequality,includingpaymentprotectionmechanism,securityandprivacyprotection,andpositivereputation.Kimetal. (2008)hasdemonstratedthattheseelementsofane-commercewebsitecandecrease(orincrease)perceivedrisksfrombuyersandincrease(ordecrease)theirtrust.InthecontextofCBEC,consumersfeelmoreuncertaintyandriskduetothe“longdistance”(Kimetal.,2017)acrossbordersandaroundtheglobe.Therefore,ahigh
Journal of Global Information ManagementVolume 28 • Issue 1 • January-March 2020
172
qualityofaCBECplatformcanreduceriskperceptionforconsumersandmakethemlesssensitivetouncertainty.Thus,theauthorshypothesisthat:
H8:Alternativewebsitequalitypositivelyaffectsperceivedrisksfrombuyers.
Trust Transfer TheoryTrust transfer theory refers to thephenomenon that a trustor baseshis or heroriginal trust in asource,onthetrustalreadyembeddedinanotherrelatedtarget,orthesametargetinanothercontext(Stewart,2003).Generally,therearetwotypesofrelationshipsbetweensourceandtarget:similarityandbusinesstie,respectively.Asimilarityrelationshipisregardedasaninternalconnection,andsuchaconnectionreferstothesamefeaturesorattributesoftrustedsourceandtarget.Iftwoobjects(i.e.sourceandtarget)haveseveraltraitsincommon,theywillbeperceivedasbelongingtothesamecategory,andthetrusttransferoccurs.Abusinesstierelationshiprepresentsexternalconnection,whichisdisplayedasacuefromoutsidesources.Forexample,iftwoproductsarefromthesamecompany,thetwowebsitesshareinterlinks.Trusttransfertheoryisimportantinunderstandingthemechanismoftrustbuilding,especiallyforrelatedtargets(Mou&Cohen,2017).Ifacustomertrustsasalesman,thenthecustomerlikelytruststheproductsheorshesells,aswellasthecompanyheorshebelongsto(Doney&Cannon,1997).Trustcanalsobetransferredfrombrickandmortarretailerstotheironlineshop(Kuan&Bock,2007).Thisisalsoabusinesstierelationship.Todemonstratesimilarityexamples,thetrustfrominternetpaymentscanbetransferredtomobilepayments(Luetal.,2011),andfrominternetandadministrationtopublice-service(Belanche,Casaló,Flavián,&Schepers,2014).
Inthisstudy, therelationshipbetweenCBECplatformwebsitesanditsproviders(sellers) issimilartotherelationshipbetweenacompanyanditssalesmen.Asdiscussedabove,thisrelationshipbelongstobusinessties,becausetheCBECplatformdoesnothavethesimilarfeaturesaswebsiteproviders,albeittheyareallbundledtogether.Therefore,theauthorshypothesisthefollowing:
H9:TrustintheCBECplatformwebsitepositivelyaffectbuyers’trustinproviders.
Control VariablesNationalculturereferstothesimilarpatternofmentalmodewithinagroupofpeople(Hofstede,1998).Ithasbeenshowntoinfluenceconsumerbehaviors(Thitimajshimaetal.,2018).Culturediffersfromcountrytocountry,aswellasamongdifferentlocationswithinasinglecountry.Researchershaveappliedculturetostudydifferentaspectsofglobalinformationmanagement,suchasITdevelopment,operations,managementanduse (Gallupe&Tan,1999).Consequently,CBECisculture-bound.Becauseofthis,cultureisacontrolvariableinthisstudy.
Inaddition toculture, thisstudyalso includesage,gender,and incomeascontrolvariables.Psychologists believe that demographics play an important role in an individual perceptual andjudgmentformationprocess.Forexample,researchersarguethatgenderdifferencesareinstrumentalinconsumerdecisionmakingprocessforonlineshoppingcontext(Stafford,Turan,&Raisinghani,2004).Previously,researchershavefoundthatmalesaremorelikelytousetheInternetthanfemales.Specifically,menaremorelikelythanwomentoparticipateinonlineauctionsandpaytodownloaddigitalcontent(Sebastianelli,Tamimi,&Rajan,2008).Inanonlineshoppingcontext,youngerandfemaleconsumersaremorelikelytoimpulsivelypurchaseonline,whileolderandmaleconsumersarenot(Leong,Jaafar,&Ainin,2018).Further,previousliteraturesalsosuggestthatonlineconsumer’sage,genderandincomemayaffecttheintentiontorepurchaseonline(Aladwani,2018;Farivar,Turel,&Yuan,2018).Ontheotherhand,buyersmaybemoresensitivetoonlinetransactions,oroverlycarefultowhenpurchasingonCBECduetouncertaintiessuchasfraud.Therefore,theauthorsusefraudasanothercontrolvariable.
Journal of Global Information ManagementVolume 28 • Issue 1 • January-March 2020
173
TheresearchmodelisillustratedinFigure1below.
RESEARCH METHodoLoGy
Research SettingToobtainasetofhigh-qualitydata,theauthorscollaboratedwithoneofthebiggestCBECplatformsinChina,Dhgate.com.ThisfirmisawholesalemarketwhichdelegatestohelpSMEsengageinglobalmarketplacesthroughCBECchannels.Itcovers1.2millionChinesevendorswithmorethan30millionproducts,including,butnotlimitedtothefollowing:apparel&accessories,computers&networking,consumerelectronics,toys&hobbies,health&beauty,bags&jewelry.Onthebuyerside,thereareapproximately10millionenterprisesandindividualbuyersfrom220countriesandregions.Inaddition,tofacilitatetheconsumers’purchaseinthiscross-borderfirmmoreeasily,itrunsbothaPC-basedwebsiteplatformandamobile/tablet-basedapplication.Tobettercollecttargetdata,theauthorsdistributedthesurveythroughanonlinesurveysystem.
MeasuresInthispaper,mostitemsinsurveyssuchasprivacyrisk,trustinvendor,trustinwebsiteandrepeatpurchase intentionwere adopted fromprevious literature,with small changes appropriate to theCBECcontext.Somemeasuresforconfiscationrisk,customsdutiescost,andfinancialriskhadtobedevelopedbasedoninputfromindustryexpertsandtheconceptualdefinitionsofthoseconstructs.ThiswasbecauseexistingmeasurementscaleswerenotconsideredappropriateforthecomplexnatureofCBECcomparedtoadomestice-commercesetting.Forexample,confiscationriskwasmeasuredthroughfour itemsreflecting theconsumer’sconcern thatcustomsauthoritiesmay interceptandconfiscatetheirproductwithoutcompensation.Theauthorsmeasuredcustomsdutiescostrefractingtheuncertaintysurroundingpaymentinadditionalimportduties.Theauthorsadoptedfiveitemsfrom(Lietal.,2006)tomeasurealternativewebsitequality,whichreflectthatanalternativewebsiteisattractiveandappealing.ThemeasurementitemsarepresentinAppendixB.Theauthorsadoptedthefive-pointLikert-scale,withanchorsrangingfrom“stronglydisagree,”to“stronglyagree.”
data CollectionThe authors first conducted a pilot test to determine whether the survey instruments wereunderstandableforparticipantsandwhetherthereareanyambiguousorconfusingmeasurementitems
Figure 1. Research model
Journal of Global Information ManagementVolume 28 • Issue 1 • January-March 2020
174
inthequestionnaires,aswellastoensurethatthesurveyitemsareappropriateintheCBECcontext.Topreventpoorresponseduetoover-sampling,therandomselectionwaslimitedtothreeoutofevery100sitevisitors(3%)whohadnotparticipatedintheprovider’ssatisfactionsurveywithinthepreviousthree-monthperiod.Basedonthesite’srulesandtominimizedisruptiontotheircustomers’shoppingexperience,thepop-upratewasdecreasedwithapproximately12respondentsperdayoveraone-and-a-half-monthperiod.Participatinginthesurveywastotallyvoluntary,andanonymitywasensuredbyconfiguringthesurveyapplicationtodisregardanyrespondentidentificationinformation.Wheninvitedtoconsiderparticipating,buyerscouldselectto“participatenow”,“maybenexttime”,or“don’taskagain”.Therewasnolossofbenefitwhetherornotarespondentchosetoparticipate.ThesurveyofthisstudywasoriginallycompiledinEnglish.
Giventheactivevisitors/usersaredifferenteveryday,thefirmdidnotletustoknowhowmanytimesintotalthepopupsoccurredduringthesampleperiod.Theauthorsdoknowthatduringtheweekdays,moresampleswerecollected,whileduringweekend,lesssampleswereavailable.Duetothevoluntarytraitofallparticipants,theauthorsbelievethattheindividualswhotookpartintheactivityweresufficientlyrandom,andthesamplewasthereforenotexhibitedbias.
RESULTS
Characteristics of demographicsAfter6weeks,theauthorshadobtainedbothC-buyerandB-buyersamples.TofocusonB-buyersrepurchaseintention,theauthorsdroppedresponsesfromC-buyers.Theauthorsultimatelyadopted243B-buyersamplesintotaltotesttheresearchmodel.DemographicstatisticsareshowninTable1,below.AllparticipantsinthisstudyindicatedthattheyhadpurchasedproductsfromanalternativeChinese cross-border website during last several months. As shown, most B-buyers were males(76.5%).Furthermore,mostoftherespondentswereoftheagerangebetween21-50,regardlessofgender.Amongtherespondents,adesirablemajorityof88.5%hadpreviouspurchaseexperienceinthiscross-borderwebsite.Inaddition,theauthorsfoundthat37%werefromtheUS,7.4%fromCanada,7.4%fromtheUK,4.1%fromAustralia,and3.7%fromBrazil;othersweremainlyfromotherEuropeancountriessuchasNetherlands,Germany,Italy,SpainandotherSouthAmericacountriessuchasChile.ThisgreaterproportionofresponsesfromNorthAmericawasnotunexpectedandisconsistentwiththisfirm’smarketingstrategies,whichislargelyfocusedonNorthAmerica,EuropeandEnglish-speakingcounties.Last,thetestofcommonmethodbias,reliability,andvaliditycanbefoundinAppendixCandD.
Hypothesis TestingThestructuralmodelofthisstudywastestedbyusingSmartPLSsoftware.Theauthorsusedthebootstrapmethod(5,000re-samples)todeterminethesignificanceofthepathsintheresearchmodel.ThePLS-SEMhasbeenemployedinthisstudyduetothefollowingreasons:first,itcanestimatetheitemsloadingsofconstructsandsimultaneouslytesttherelationshipamongthevariablesinwhichtheauthorsareinterested;second,itisappropriateforthesmallsimplesize.AccordingtoChinandNewsted(1999),thesamplesizeshouldbetentimesthelargestnumberofindependentvariables.Thisstudyhas13independentvariables(includingcontrolvariables),andthesamplesizeof243exceedstentimesthatamount,thereforeitisadequateforPLS-SEManalysis.
Theconstructsofalternativewebsitequality,trustinprovider,trustinwebsiteandrepurchaseintention were modeled as first order constructs. The authors model perceived risk as a secondorder construct. For the assessment of psychological constructs, researchers normally adoptedeither reflective measurement or formative measurement (Christophersen & Konradt, 2012). Inotherwords,manyconstructallowbothreflectiveandformativemeasurementiftheapproachcanbeexplainedbyanunderlyingtheory(Chin,1998).Inthisstudy,theauthorsconsideredperceived
Journal of Global Information ManagementVolume 28 • Issue 1 • January-March 2020
175
riskasahigh-orderreflectiveconstruct.ThisisbecausebasedontheapproachofFeathermanandPavlou(2003),riskperceptionscouldbemodeledasareflectivemeasurementconstruct.Secondly,reflectivemeasurementsareexpectedhighcorrelationamongfirstorderconstructe.g.,customerdutiescost,confiscationrisk,deliveryrisk,financialriskandprivacyrisk.Further,thefirstorderconstructscanbeinterpretedasacriterionforhighinternalconsistency(Christophersen&Konradt,2012).Therefore,alltheconstructsinthisstudyaremodeledasreflectivefactors.Further,theinter-associationsareconsideredtobetterunderstandtherepurchaseintentionofCBEC.
AsshowninTable2,alternativewebsitequalitydidnotsignificantlyinfluencetrustinprovider,nortrustinwebsite.However,theauthorsfoundthatalternativewebsitequalitycanmediateperceivedriskandthusindirectlyinfluencetrustinwebsite.Inaddition,theauthorsfoundthatperceivedriskdidnotsignificantlyinfluencetrustinprovider.Therefore,thepathcoefficientsofH4,H6,andH7werenotsignificant.Further,theauthorsfoundthatB-buyerrepurchaseintentionisdeterminedbytrustinprovider,trustinwebsiteandriskperceptions.Moreover,theauthorsfoundtrustinwebsitesignificantlyinfluencestrustinprovider.Last,theauthorsfoundtrustinwebsitewassignificantlyinfluencedbyperceivedrisk.Theauthorsthereforeconfirmedotherhypothesis.Nocontrolvariables
Table 1. Descriptive statistics of respondents’ characteristics
Demographics Category N (n=243) Percentage (%)
Gender
Male 186 76.5%
Female 54 22.2%
Missing 3 1.3%
Age
Under21 16 6.6%
21-30 56 23.0%
31-40 65 26.8%
41-50 51 21.0%
51-60 36 14.8%
Over60 17 7.0%
Missing 2 0.8%
Country
USA 90 37.0%
Canada 18 7.4%
UK 18 7.4%
Australia 10 4.1%
Brazil 9 3.7%
Italy 8 3.3%
Mexico 6 2.5%
NewZealand 5 2.1%
SouthAfrica 5 2.1%
Others 69 28.4%
Missing 5 2.0%
Thiscross-borderwebsitepurchaseexperience
Yes 215 88.5%
No 27 11.2%
Missing 1 0.4%
Journal of Global Information ManagementVolume 28 • Issue 1 • January-March 2020
176
weresignificantinthisstudy.Theresearchmodelexplained53.3percentofthevarianceinrepurchaseintentionofB-buyerstousethisCBECplatform.Inaddition,accordingtoHenseleretal.(2014),theauthorsappliedthestandardizedrootmeansquareresidual(SRMR)asanindextoevaluatetheoverallmodelfit.ThevalueofSRMRis0.054,whichisbelowthecriteriavalueof0.080,indicatingagoodmodelfit.TheresultsofthehypothesistestaredepictedinFigure2.
Post-hoc Analysis of Mediating EffectsThemediatingeffectofperceivedriskonthepathbetweenalternativewebsitequalityandperceivedrisk,themediatingeffectoftrustinwebsiteonthelinkbetweenperceivedriskandtrustinproviderhavealsobeencarriedoutviaaSobeltest.TheSobeltestallowsustotestthemediatingeffectssuggestedbytheresearchmodel.Theauthorsfoundthatperceivedriskplaysafullmediationeffectonthepathbetweenalternativewebsitequalityandperceivedrisk(-2.075,p<0.05).Inaddition,supportfortrustinwebsiteasafullyexplanatoryvariablefortheeffectsofperceivedriskontrustinproviderisconfirmedbyasignificantSobelstatistic(-2.908,p<0.01).
Figure 2. PLS test of research model (dash line represents non-significant results)
Table 2. Summary of results (*p<0.05; ***p<0.001).
Hypothesis (path) Path coefficient t-Value Support
H1 0.247 2.546* Yes
H2 0.505 5.111*** Yes
H3 -0.110 2.328* Yes
H4 -0.012 0.190 No
H5 -0.194 2.103* Yes
H6 -0.041 0.648 No
H7 -0.037 0.398 No
H8 0.387 6.021*** Yes
H9 0.659 10.778*** Yes
Journal of Global Information ManagementVolume 28 • Issue 1 • January-March 2020
177
discussionInthisdayandage,CBECandglobaltradegohandinhand.WhileB-buyerscancontributemoremarginforthefirm,theyalsocontributemoreGMVinaCBECplatforms.TherearesomestudiesthatfocusonB-buyerbehaviorsindomesticonlineshopping,whichcanhelpscholarstogainmoreinsightinstuddinge-commerce.However,throughreviewingtheCBECliterature,therestillremainsalackofstudiestoinvestigateB-buyerbehaviorunderCBECcontext.Therefore,theauthorsapplytrust transfer theory,perceivedrisk,andalternativewebsitequality tostudyrepurchaseintentionfocusingonB-buyers.
Theauthorsfoundthatperceivedriskcannegativelyaffectthetrustinwebsite,whereasitcannotsignificantlyaffecttrustintheprovider.ThisisbecauseprovidersintheCBECwebsiteweregenerallySMEs, which were not influential in the website. As a result, consumer’s perception, trust, andbehaviorintentionweremorereliedonthewebsiteratherthantheprovider.Thiscouldalsoexplainwhytrustinwebsitecouldinfluencetrustinprovider,andwhythepathcoefficientbetweentrustinwebsiteandrepurchaseintentionwaslargerthanthatofthetrustinprovider.
Further,trustinprovider,trustinwebsiteandperceivedriskcanexplain53.3%variance.Thisisslightlyhigherthanthestudyof(Thatcheretal.,2013),whomfoundthattrustinmerchant,trustinwebsite,and trustpropensitycanexplain51.1%of thevariance for familiar shoppingbuyers,howeversuchfactorsonlyexplain34.1%variancefornewbuyers.InanCBECenvironment,thewholetransactionprocessessuchassurfing,querying,ordering,andpaymentareachievedviawebsite.Atrustedwebsiteismorelikelytoformconsumer’spositivepurchasebehaviors,whileinavirtualenvironment,sellersandbuyersonlycaninteractivethroughwebsite,astheynormallydonotknoweachotherwell.Indeed,onlybasedontheperceptionsofseller’swebsitecantheconsumersmakeaninitialdecisionfortheirpurchase.Therefore,trustinwebsitebecomesmoreimportantthantrustinproviderinthecontextofCBEC.
Theauthorsfoundthattrustinwebsitecansignificantlyinfluencetrustinprovider(β=0.659).Thisfindingcananswerthesecondquestionofthisstudy.Theeffectbetweenthelinkishigherthanthestudyof(Vakeeletal.,2017),whoonlyfoundtheeffectas0.364inconsumerpostpurchasestageinadomesticsetting.Thisisconstantwithtrusttransfertheory,whichstatesthattrustmaytransferfromdifferentkindsofsources.Trusttransfertheoryhasbeenstudiedunderthecontextofe-commerce,mobilecommerce,aswellassocialcommerce.Asanextension,thisstudyfoundthattrustinwebsitecanalsoinfluencetrustinproviderinCBECenvironment.
Interestingly,alternativewebsitequalitydidnotaffectthetrustineithertheproviderorthewebsite.WhenaconsumerperceivesanalternativeCBECwebsiteasahighquality,she/heismorelikelytoformpositiveperceptionsforalternatives.Consumersaremoreeasilytocomparebothwebsites.Sincetheconsumersconsiderthealternativesaremuchbetter,theriskperceptionsofthiswebsitemayarise.Obviously,alternativewebsitequalitycould indirectly influencerepurchase intention.Thus,fromtheresultofthisstudytheauthorscoulddeducethatalternativewebsitequalityaffectsrepurchaseintentionthroughmechanismsotherthantrust.Inthecurrentstudy,theauthorsconfirmedthatperceivedriskmediatedthelinkbetweenalternativewebsitequalityandbehaviorintention.Theauthorsbelievetherearealsoothermediatorswhichmayplayanimportantrolebetweenalternativewebsitequalityandtrust.Thiseasilyisonefurtherresearchtopic.
Thusfar,weidentifiedthedimensionsofriskinCBECenvironmenttonamelyincludecustomerdutiescostrisk,confiscationrisk,deliveryrisk,financialriskandprivacyrisk.Multi-dimensionalriskisalsoseenrelevant,andgiventhecomplextransactionnatureofCBEC,theauthorsfoundcustomerdutiescostriskandconfiscationriskareimportantaswell.
THEoRETICAL CoNTRIBUTIoNS
Theoretically,theauthorshavefirstclassifiedtheperceivedrisksascustomerdutiescost,confiscationrisk,deliverrisk,financialrisk,andprivacyrisk.Thisisdifferentwithpriorstudies,whichclassified
Journal of Global Information ManagementVolume 28 • Issue 1 • January-March 2020
178
thedimensionsofriskperceptionsasfinancialrisk,performancerisk,deliveryrisk,psychologicalrisk,socialrisk,timerisk,andprivacyrisk(Featherman&Pavlou,2003).ThiscanhelpresearcherstobetterunderstandthedimensionsofriskperceptioninCBECcontext.Second,theauthorsfoundthatthetrustinwebsitecanpositivelyaffectthetrustinprovider,aswellasaffecttherepurchaseintention.Thishelps to solidify the trust transfer theory inCBECcontext.Third,we found thatalternativewebsitequalityindirectlyinfluencesconsumertrust.Priorstudieshaveconfirmedthedirecteffectofwebsitequalityontrust.Meanwhile,alternativewebsitequalityisnotafunctionofbothtrustinproviderandtrustinwebsiteinthecontextofCBEC.
PRACTICAL CoNTRIBUTIoNS
Practically speaking, this study first contributed tounderstandingperceived risk forB-buyers inCBECenvironments.ItcanhelpanyCBECwebsitetoattractmoreconsumersbydevelopingtheirownsecurityguaranteeandcompensationmechanismduetologisticissues,sincethesearethemostinfluentialperceivedrisks.Forexample,abuyersuggeststhat“thesellersshouldtrytheirbesttoreducetheriskofcustomduties,toimprovebuyer’spurchaseintentiononaCBECplatform”.Anotherbuyerleavedacomment,“...oftenoverpriceddutycharges”.Onebuyercomplainedabout“acustomdutyof$345onmyrecentorder”.Anothernotablecommentbyabuyersuggestedto“reduceshippingcostabitbecausecustomsdutythissideiscostly”.TheCBECplatformmaysatisfytheconsumersbyindicatingtheinformationaboutdutycosts.Giventhatallthetransactionsareinternational,studyingthetermofcustomdutycostisimportanttohelpCBECplatformsandlogisticservicefirmsbuildtheirappropriateservicestrategy.Confiscationriskhasalsobeenaconcernforbuyers.Forinstance,abuyermentioned,“SellersshouldannouncethebuyeriftheitemislostorholdbyChinacustomassoonastheyknowaboutit.”
Secondly, increasing trust in website can promote significant repurchase intention, therebyincreasingthequalityofwebsite.Thus,increasingwebsitetrustisimperative.ThiscanguideCBECfirmstobuildanappropriatemarketingstrategy.Forexample,bymitigatingriskperceptions,CBECfirmsmaystronglyimproveconsumertrustandasaresult,improveB-buyers’repurchasebehavior.Thedegreeoftrustinprovidercanalsodriveconsumers’behavior.Sellersshouldprovideagoodproductdescriptionintheironlineshop.
InCBECcontext,productswithdescriptionrelatedissuesarefrequentlyreported.Forexample,abuyerposted,“theproductdescriptionsareoftenpoorlywritten.WhenIcomeacrossaproductdescriptionwithpoorgrammar,typos,etc.Itendtoskipoveritbecauseitmakesmeafraidthattheproductmaybeflawedaswell”.Inaddition,anotherbuyercomplainedofreceivingproductsthatdidnotmeetexpectations,onmultipleoccasions.Thisbuyerfollowedthecomplaintwiththesuggestionthat“sellersshouldensurethattheirdescriptionisaccurate.”CBECsellersshouldtranslateappropriatelanguagetoovercomethelanguagebarriers.Thiscanhelpbuyerstobetterunderstandtheproducts,andthereforehelpthebuyersformpositiverepurchasebehaviors.CBECplatformsshouldbuildrulestoregulateseller’sbehavior,leadsellerprovidinghighqualityproducts,andthereforegainmoretrustformbuyers.Forinstance,theplatformcansetupmoreparameterswhenthesellerisuploadingaproduct.Ifandonlyiftheproductmeetsitscriterion,itmaybepublishedonline.
Last,theauthorsfoundriskperceptionsarenegativelyassociatedwithrepurchaseintentions.Thefirmsshoulddisclosethedutycost,deliveronlytheproductsunderregulations,delivertheproductsinatimelymanner,anddonotdiscloseconsumer’sprivateinformationtoanythirdparties.Thiswillpotentiallydecreasethebuyers’riskperceptions,andthereforeleadmoresales.
Journal of Global Information ManagementVolume 28 • Issue 1 • January-March 2020
179
LIMITATIoNS ANd FUTURE RESEARCH
Thisstudyhassomelimitations.First,theauthorschoseasingleCBECplatformtocollectthesample,whichmaypotentiallythreatgeneralizability.FutureresearchmaycollectdatafromseveralCBECplatforms.Second,thedatawascross-sectional,andtherefore,causalinferencescouldonlybemadewithreferencetotheory.FuturestudiesmayadoptlongitudinaldesignsandconsiderthetemporalchangesinhumanbeliefstowardCBECcontext.Finally,unexploredfactorsmaybealsoimportantforCBEC;thisisanotherfurtherresearchpoint.
ACKNoWLEdGMENT
We would like to thank the editor and the anonymous reviewers and Dr. Jason Cohen for theircomments,whichhavegreatlyimprovedourpaper.ThisstudysupportedbytheFundamentalResearchFundsfortheCentralUniversitiesofNo.20103176477[BX180604].
Journal of Global Information ManagementVolume 28 • Issue 1 • January-March 2020
180
REFERENCES
Ai,W.,Yang,J.,&Wang,L.(2016).Revelationofcross-borderlogisticsperformanceforthemanufacturingindustry development. International Journal of Mobile Communications, 14(6), 593–609. doi:10.1504/IJMC.2016.079302
Aladwani,A.M.(2018).Aquality-facilitatedsocializationmodelofsocialcommercedecisions.International Journal of Information Management,40,1–7.doi:10.1016/j.ijinfomgt.2018.01.006
Anderson,J.C.,&Narus,J.A.(1990).Amodelofdistributorfirmandmanufacturerfirmworkingpartnerships.Journal of Marketing,54(1),42–58.doi:10.1177/002224299005400103
Antony, S., Lin, Z., & Xu, B. (2006). Determinants of escrow service adoption in consumer-to-consumeronlineauctionmarket:Anexperimentalstudy.Decision Support Systems,42(3),1889–1900.doi:10.1016/j.dss.2006.04.012
Belanche,D.,Casaló,L.V.,Flavián,C.,&Schepers,J.(2014).Trusttransferinthecontinuedusageofpublice-services.Information & Management,51(6),627–640.doi:10.1016/j.im.2014.05.016
Bhatnagar, A., Misra, S., & Rao, H. R. (2000). On risk, convenience, and internet shopping behavior.Communications of the ACM,43(11),98–105.doi:10.1145/353360.353371
Chin,W.W.(1998).Thepartialleastsquaresapproachforstructuralequationmodeling.InG.A.Marcoulides(Ed.),Modern methods for business research(pp.295–336).Hillsdale,IN:LawrenceErlbaumAssociates.
Chin,W.W.,&Newsted,P.R.(1999).Structuralequationmodelinganalysiswithsmallsamplesusingpartialleastsquares.InR.H.Hoyle(Ed.),Statistical strategies for small sample research(pp.307–342).ThousandOaks,CA:Sage.
Chiu,C.M.,Wang,E.T.G.,Fang,Y.H.,&Huang,H.Y.(2014).Understandingcustomers’repeatpurchaseintentions inb2ce-commerce:Therolesofutilitarianvalue,hedonicvalueandperceivedrisk.Information Systems Journal,24(1),85–114.doi:10.1111/j.1365-2575.2012.00407.x
Cho,H.,&Lee,J.(2017).Searchingforlogisticsandregulatorydeterminantsaffectingoverseasdirectpurchase:An empirical cross-national study. Asian Journal of Shipping & Logistics, 33(1), 11–18. doi:10.1016/j.ajsl.2017.03.002
Christophersen,T.,&Konradt,U.(2012).Developmentandvalidationofaformativeandareflectivemeasurefortheassessmentofonlinestoreusability.Behaviour & Information Technology,31(9),839–857.doi:10.1080/0144929X.2010.529165
DeLone,W.H.,&McLean,E.R.(2003).TheDeLoneandMcLeanmodelofinformationsystemssuccess:Aten-yearupdate.Journal of Management Information Systems,19(4),9–30.doi:10.1080/07421222.2003.11045748
Doney,P.M.,&Cannon,J.P.(1997).Anexaminationofthenatureoftrustinbuyer–sellerrelationships.Journal of Marketing,61(2),35–51.
Farivar,S.,Turel,O.,&Yuan,Y.(2018).Skewingusers’rationalriskconsiderationsinsocialcommerce:Anempirical examination of the role of social identification. Information & Management, 55(8), 1038–1048.doi:10.1016/j.im.2018.05.008
Featherman,M.S.,&Pavlou,P.A.(2003).Predictinge-servicesadoption:Aperceivedriskfacetsperspective.International Journal of Human-Computer Studies,59(4),451–474.doi:10.1016/S1071-5819(03)00111-3
Fishbein,M.,&Ajzen,I.(1975).Belief,attitude,intentionandbehaviour:Anintroductiontotheoryandresearch.Philosophy & Rhetoric,41(4),842–844.
Gallupe,R.B.,&Tan,F.B.(1999).Aresearchmanifestoforglobalinformationmanagement.Journal of Global Information Management,7(3),5–18.doi:10.4018/jgim.1999070101
Gefen,D.(2002).Customerloyaltyine-commerce.Journal of the Association for Information Systems,3(1),27–51.doi:10.17705/1jais.00022
Gomez-Herrera,E.,Martens,B.,&Turlea,G.(2014).Thedriversandimpedimentsforcross-bordere-commerceintheEU.Information Economics and Policy,28(1),83–96.doi:10.1016/j.infoecopol.2014.05.002
Journal of Global Information ManagementVolume 28 • Issue 1 • January-March 2020
181
Guo,Y.,Bao,Y.,Stuart,B.J.,&Le-Nguyen,K.(2018).Tosellornot tosell:Exploringsellers’ trustandriskofchargebackfraudincross-borderelectroniccommerce.Information Systems Journal,28(2),359–383.doi:10.1111/isj.12144
Hallikainen,H.,&Laukkanen,T.(2018).Nationalcultureandconsumertrustine-commerce.International Journal of Information Management,38(1),97–106.doi:10.1016/j.ijinfomgt.2017.07.002
Henseler,J.,Dijkstra,T.K.,Sarstedt,M.,Ringle,C.M.,Diamantopoulos,A.,Straub,D.W.,&Calantone,R.J.et al.(2014).CommonbeliefsandrealityaboutPLS:CommentsonRönkköandEvermann(2013).Organizational Research Methods,17(2),182–209.doi:10.1177/1094428114526928
Hofstede,G.(1998).Identifyingorganizationalsubcultures:Anempiricalapproach.Journal of Management Studies,35(1),1–12.doi:10.1111/1467-6486.00081
Hong,I.B.(2018).BuildingInitialTrustinanIntermediaryinB2COnlineMarketplaces:TheKoreanEvidencefromInterpark.com.Journal of Global Information Management,26(2),27–47.doi:10.4018/JGIM.2018040102
Hong,I.B.,&Cha,H.S.(2013).Themediatingroleofconsumertrustinanonlinemerchantinpredictingpurchase intention. International Journal of Information Management, 33(6), 927–939. doi:10.1016/j.ijinfomgt.2013.08.007
Huang,S.L.,&Chang,Y.C.(2017).Factorsthatimpactconsumers’intentiontoshoponforeignonlinestores.Proceedings of Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences.
iResearch.(2017).Report for online consumption in 2017.Retrievedfromhttp://www.iresearch.cn/include/ajax/user_ajax.ashx?work=idown&rid=3128
Johnson,D.J.,&Rusbult,C.E.(1989).Resistingtemptation:Devaluationofalternativepartnersasameansofmaintainingcommitmentincloserelationships.Journal of Personality and Social Psychology,57(6),967–980.doi:10.1037/0022-3514.57.6.967
Kalia,P.,Arora,D.R.,&Kumalo,S. (2016).E-servicequality, consumer satisfactionand futurepurchaseintentionsine-retail.e-Service Journal,10(1),24–41.doi:10.2979/eservicej.10.1.02
Kim,D.J.,Ferrin,D.L.,&Rao,H.R.(2008).Atrust-basedconsumerdecision-makingmodelinelectroniccommerce:Theroleoftrust,perceivedrisk,andtheirantecedents.Decision Support Systems,44(2),544–564.doi:10.1016/j.dss.2007.07.001
Kim, D. J., Ferrin, D. L., & Rao, H. R. (2009). Trust and satisfaction, two stepping stones for successfule-commerce relationships: A longitudinal exploration. Information Systems Research, 20(2), 237–257.doi:10.1287/isre.1080.0188
Kim,T.Y.,Dekker,R.,&Heij,C.(2017).Cross-borderelectroniccommerce:DistanceeffectsandexpressdeliveryinEuropeanunionmarkets.International Journal of Electronic Commerce,21(2),184–218.doi:10.1080/10864415.2016.1234283
Kraemer,K.L.,Gibbs,J.,&Dedrick,J.(2005).Impactsofglobalizationone-commerceuseandfirmperformance:Across-countryinvestigation.The Information Society,21(5),323–340.doi:10.1080/01972240500253350
Kuan,H.H.,&Bock,G.W.(2007).Trusttransferenceinbrickandclickretailers:Aninvestigationofthebefore-online-visitphase.Information & Management,44(2),175–187.doi:10.1016/j.im.2006.12.002
Leong,L.Y.,Jaafar,N.I.,&Ainin,S.(2018).TheeffectsofFacebookbrowsingandusageintensityonimpulsepurchaseinf-commerce.Computers in Human Behavior,78,160–173.doi:10.1016/j.chb.2017.09.033
Li,C.,&Chan,T.(2016).Ten China commercial highlights 2016 series: Cross-border e-commerce import businesses see rapid growth; new channels for commercial enterprises to transform and innovate.Retrievedfrom https://www.fbicgroup.com/sites/default/files/Ten%20Highlights%20of%20China’s%20Commercial%20Sector%202016_07.pdf
Li,D.,Browne,G.,&Wetherbe,J.(2006).Whydointernetusersstickwithaspecificwebsite?Arelationshipperspective.International Journal of Electronic Commerce,10(4),105–141.doi:10.2753/JEC1086-4415100404
Lin,J.,Wang,B.,Wang,N.,&Lu,Y.(2014).Understandingtheevolutionofconsumertrustinmobilecommerce:Alongitudinalstudy.Information Technology Management,15(1),37–49.doi:10.1007/s10799-013-0172-y
Journal of Global Information ManagementVolume 28 • Issue 1 • January-March 2020
182
Lu,Y.,Yang,S.,Chau,P.Y.K.,&Cao,Y.(2011).Dynamicsbetweenthetrusttransferprocessandintentiontousemobilepaymentservices:Across-environmentperspective.Information & Management,48(8),393–403.doi:10.1016/j.im.2011.09.006
Marriott,H.R.,&Williams,M.D.(2018).Exploringconsumersperceivedriskandtrustformobileshopping:A theoretical framework and empirical study. Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, 42, 133–146.doi:10.1016/j.jretconser.2018.01.017
Mayer,R.C.,Davis,J.H.,&Schoorman,F.D.(1995).Anintegrativemodeloforganizationaltrust.Academy of Management Review,20(3),709–734.doi:10.5465/amr.1995.9508080335
McKnight,D.H.,Choudhury,V.,&Kacmar,C.(2002).Developingandvalidatingtrustmeasuresfore-commerce:Anintegrativetypology.Information Systems Research,13(3),334–359.doi:10.1287/isre.13.3.334.81
MinistryofCommerce.(2017).Report of electronic commerce in China.Retrievedfromhttp://images.mofcom.gov.cn/dzsws/201706/20170621110205702.pdf
Mou,J.,&Cohen,J.(2017).Trustandonlineconsumerhealthservicesuccess:Alongitudinalstudy.Information Development,33(2),169–189.doi:10.1177/0266666916642507
Mou, J.,Cohen,Y.,Dou,Y.,&Zhang,B. (2017).Predictingbuyers’ repurchase intentions incross-bordere-commerce:Avalenceframeworkperspective.Proceedings of the 25th European Conference on Information Systems.
Mou,J.,&Shin,D.(2018).Effectsofsocialpopularityandtimescarcityononlineconsumerbehaviorregardingsmarthealthcareproducts:Aneye-trackingapproach.Computers in Human Behavior,78,74–89.doi:10.1016/j.chb.2017.08.049
Mou,J.,Shin,D.,&Cohen,J.(2017).Understandingtrustandperceivedusefulnessintheconsumeracceptanceofane-service:Alongitudinalinvestigation.Behaviour & Information Technology,36(2),125–139.doi:10.1080/0144929X.2016.1203024
Pavlou, P. A., Liang, H., & Xue, Y. (2007). Understanding and mitigating uncertainty in online exchangerelationships: A principal-agent perspective. Management Information Systems Quarterly, 31(1), 105–136.doi:10.2307/25148783
Peter,J.P.,&Tarpey,L.X.Sr.(1975).Acomparativeanalysisofthreeconsumerdecisionstrategies.The Journal of Consumer Research,2(1),29–37.doi:10.1086/208613
Podsakoff,P.M.,&Organ,D.W. (2016).Self-reports inorganizational research:Problemsandprospects.Journal of Management,12(4),531–544.doi:10.1177/014920638601200408
Rönkkö,M.,&Ylitalo, J. (2011).PLSmarkervariableapproach todiagnosingandcontrolling formethodvariance.Proceedings of the International Conference on Information Systems.
Sebastianelli,R.,Tamimi,N.,&Rajan,M.(2008).Perceivedqualityofonlineshopping:Doesgendermakeadifference?Journal of Internet Commerce,7(4),445–469.doi:10.1080/15332860802507164
Sinkovics,R.R.,Mo,Y.,&Hossinger,M.(2007).Culturaladaptationincrossbordere-commerce:AstudyofGermancompanies.Journal of Electronic Commerce Research,8(4),221–235.
Sørum, H. (2015). The role of quality in websites: A discussion focusing on public versus private sectororganizations.SpringerInternationalPublishingSwitzerland.doi:10.1007/978-3-319-21006-3_10
Stafford,T.F.,Turan,A.,&Raisinghani,M.S.(2004).Internationalandcross-culturalinfluencesononlineshoppingbehavior.Journal of Global Information Technology Management,7(2),70–87.
Stewart,K.J.(2003).Trusttransferontheworldwideweb.Organization Science,14(1),5–17.
Tandon,U.,Kiran,R.,&Sah,A.N.(2018).Theinfluenceofwebsitefunctionality,driversandperceivedriskoncustomersatisfactioninonlineshopping:Anemergingeconomycase.Information Systems and e-Business Management,16(1),57–91.doi:10.1007/s10257-017-0341-3
Terzi,N. (2011).The impactofe-commerceon international tradeandemployment.Procedia: Social and Behavioral Sciences,24,745–753.doi:10.1016/j.sbspro.2011.09.010
Journal of Global Information ManagementVolume 28 • Issue 1 • January-March 2020
183
Thatcher,J.B.,Carter,M.,Li,X.,&Rong,G.(2013).AclassificationandinvestigationoftrusteesinB-to-Ce-commerce:Generalvs.specific trust.Communications of the Association for Information Systems,32(1),107–134.
Thitimajshima,W.,Esichaikul,V.,&Krairit,D.(2018).Aframeworktoidentifyfactorsaffectingtheperformanceofthird-partyB2Be-marketplaces:Aseller’sperspective.Electronic Markets,28(2),129–147.doi:10.1007/s12525-017-0256-3
Tmogroup. (2015). Differences between cross border e-commerce & Haitao. Retrieved from https://www.tmogroup.asia/difference-between-cross-border-ecommerce-haitao/
Treiblmaier,H.,&Chong,S.(2011).Trustandperceivedriskofpersonalinformationasantecedentsofonlineinformationdisclosure:Resultsfromthreecountries.Journal of Global Information Management,19(4),76–94.doi:10.4018/jgim.2011100104
Turban, E., Whiteside, J., King, D., & Outland, J. (2017). Implementation issues: From globalization to justification, privacy, and regulation. In Introduction to Electronic Commerce and Social Commerce.SpringerInternationalPublishing.doi:10.1007/978-3-319-50091-1
Vakeel,K.A.,Das,S.,Udo,G.J.,&Bagchi,K.(2017).DosecurityandprivacypoliciesinB2BandB2Ce-commercediffer?Acomparativestudyusingcontentanalysis.Behaviour & Information Technology,36(4),390–403.doi:10.1080/0144929X.2016.1236837
Wang,X.,Zhang,J.,&Sun,D.(2017).The“internet+”basedstudyonthedevelopmentstrategyaboutSino-Russiancross-bordere-commerce.Proceedings of the Fourth International Forum on Decision Sciences.
Wikipedia.(n.d.).Belt and Road Initiative.Retrievedfromhttps://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Belt_and_Road_Initiative
Xue,W.,Li,D.,&Pei,Y.(2016).TheDevelopmentandCurrentofCross-borderE-commerce.Proceedings of Wuhan International Conference on Electronic Business.
ENdNoTES
1 DuetotheindustrialrevolutionandthedataonChina’smanufacturingvaluesadded,Chinacanproduceahugequantityofproducts,thisleadsahugeamountofmerchandiseexports.Theauthorsthereforecallita“worldfactory.”
2 TheBeltandRoadInitiativeprojectisadevelopmentstrategyadoptedbytheChinesegovernment.The‘belt’referstotheoverlandinterconnectinginfrastructurecorridors.The‘road’referstothesearoutecorridors.TheinitiativefocusesonconnectivityandcooperationbetweenEurasiancountriesandChina(Wikipedia).
Journal of Global Information ManagementVolume 28 • Issue 1 • January-March 2020
184
APPENdIX A: CRoSS-LoAdING
Table 3. Cross-loading
AWQ CD CR DR FR PC RPI TV TW
AWQ1 0.687 0.122 0.132 0.121 0.144 0.142 -0.066 -0.006 0.026
AWQ2 0.896 0.273 0.232 0.289 0.255 0.283 -0.287 -0.145 -0.187
AWQ3 0.842 0.310 0.282 0.368 0.311 0.338 -0.171 -0.075 -0.084
AWQ4 0.854 0.249 0.230 0.246 0.228 0.230 -0.175 -0.010 -0.018
AWQ5 0.859 0.228 0.196 0.224 0.241 0.268 -0.266 -0.200 -0.120
CD1 0.271 0.973 0.590 0.480 0.540 0.343 -0.159 -0.098 -0.163
CD2 0.301 0.933 0.569 0.457 0.532 0.367 -0.102 -0.091 -0.099
CR1 0.180 0.580 0.895 0.529 0.468 0.427 -0.044 -0.069 -0.026
CR2 0.200 0.568 0.904 0.554 0.486 0.424 -0.037 -0.047 -0.010
CR3 0.253 0.510 0.913 0.534 0.453 0.451 -0.071 -0.046 -0.032
CR4 0.268 0.592 0.966 0.589 0.489 0.472 -0.177 -0.152 -0.132
DR1 0.259 0.409 0.516 0.857 0.458 0.443 -0.273 -0.125 -0.239
DR2 0.280 0.364 0.495 0.890 0.395 0.476 -0.276 -0.168 -0.222
DR3 0.256 0.413 0.455 0.877 0.453 0.408 -0.332 -0.232 -0.281
DR4 0.265 0.450 0.583 0.792 0.535 0.469 -0.165 -0.073 -0.154
DR5 0.257 0.468 0.549 0.780 0.475 0.516 -0.239 -0.210 -0.121
FR1 0.282 0.526 0.478 0.515 0.995 0.407 -0.166 -0.118 -0.159
FR2 0.255 0.620 0.562 0.530 0.716 0.408 -0.024 0.007 -0.120
PC1 0.323 0.377 0.481 0.506 0.440 0.931 -0.199 -0.117 -0.144
PC2 0.281 0.311 0.443 0.478 0.381 0.952 -0.159 -0.075 -0.121
PC3 0.290 0.329 0.438 0.484 0.375 0.955 -0.172 -0.105 -0.140
PC4 0.291 0.351 0.425 0.484 0.399 0.812 -0.069 -0.061 -0.060
PC5 0.227 0.301 0.398 0.520 0.313 0.823 -0.107 -0.039 -0.062
RPI1 -0.235 -0.130 -0.095 -0.276 -0.137 -0.194 0.912 0.526 0.622
RPI2 -0.250 -0.139 -0.151 -0.368 -0.138 -0.184 0.876 0.545 0.618
RPI3 -0.230 -0.177 -0.174 -0.331 -0.181 -0.169 0.938 0.574 0.620
RPI4 -0.243 -0.123 -0.107 -0.259 -0.134 -0.133 0.929 0.588 0.646
RPI5 -0.271 -0.131 -0.107 -0.250 -0.139 -0.134 0.942 0.583 0.628
RPI6 -0.228 -0.093 -0.077 -0.271 -0.127 -0.138 0.932 0.550 0.672
TV1 -0.147 -0.074 -0.062 -0.197 -0.128 -0.069 0.550 0.886 0.616
TV2 -0.121 -0.140 -0.131 -0.223 -0.145 -0.079 0.536 0.909 0.630
TV3 -0.105 -0.045 -0.063 -0.192 -0.072 -0.111 0.564 0.928 0.578
TV4 -0.106 -0.148 -0.157 -0.194 -0.140 -0.128 0.550 0.903 0.605
TV5 -0.136 -0.101 -0.079 -0.174 -0.076 -0.060 0.563 0.915 0.583
TV6 -0.139 -0.080 -0.116 -0.182 -0.103 -0.112 0.605 0.961 0.632
TV7 -0.131 -0.093 -0.127 -0.165 -0.097 -0.083 0.590 0.954 0.633
TV8 -0.095 -0.055 -0.103 -0.165 -0.023 -0.060 0.528 0.917 0.628
TW1 -0.103 -0.084 -0.064 -0.170 -0.091 -0.086 0.621 0.680 0.917
TW2 -0.083 -0.114 -0.073 -0.212 -0.128 -0.098 0.609 0.633 0.931
TW3 -0.056 -0.079 -0.035 -0.228 -0.115 -0.051 0.592 0.584 0.897
TW4 -0.141 -0.198 -0.107 -0.288 -0.202 -0.211 0.667 0.605 0.925
TW5 -0.141 -0.180 -0.119 -0.264 -0.180 -0.126 0.664 0.586 0.930
TW6 -0.150 -0.135 -0.083 -0.229 -0.168 -0.129 0.662 0.604 0.949
Journal of Global Information ManagementVolume 28 • Issue 1 • January-March 2020
185
APPENdIX B: MEASUREMENT ITEMS
Alternativewebsitequality(Lietal.,2006)Analternativewebsiteisappealing.Analternativewebsiteisbetterthanthiswebsite.Tomyknowledge,anotherwebsiteisclosedtoideal.Analternativewebsiteisattractivetome.Myneedscouldeasilybefulfilledbyanalternativewebsite.Customsdutiescost[self-development]IfIboughtaproductfrom___,IworrythatIwillhavetopaymuchmoneyinadditionalimportduties(customstariffs)inmycountry.IfIboughtaproductfrom___,IamuncertainabouthowmuchIwillhavetopayinadditionalimportduties(customstariffs)inmycountry.Confiscationrisk[self-development]IfIboughtaproductfrom___,Iworrythattheproductwouldbeinterceptedbyauthoritiesinmycountrybeforetheyreachme.IfIboughtaproductfrom___,Iworrythattheproductwouldbeconfiscatedbyauthoritiesinmycountrywithoutcompensation.Theriskthatproductspurchasedfrom___willbeconfiscatedishigh.IfIboughtaproductfrom___,Iworrythattheproductwillnotclearcustoms.Deliveryrisk(Hong&Cha,2013)IfIboughtaproductfrom___,Iwouldbeconcernedastowhethertheproductwouldbedeliveredtothewrongaddress.IfIboughtaproductfrom___,Iwouldbeconcernedastowhethertheproductwouldbelostduringdelivery.IfIboughtaproductfrom___,Iwouldbeconcernedastowhetherawrongproductwouldbedelivered.IfIboughtaproductfrom___,Iworrythattheproductwillnotbedeliveredduetoaircraftrefusal(e.g.theproducthasmagnetism)[self-development]IfIboughtaproductfrom___,Iworrythattheproductwouldbedamagedaftershipping.[self-development]Financialrisk[self-development]IfIboughtaproductfrom___,Imaysuffermonetarylossduetofluctuationsinexchangerates.IfIboughtaproductfrom___,IworrythatIwillfaceextracoststoshiptomycity.Privacyrisk(Kimetal.,2009)Iamconcernedthat___iscollectingtoomuchpersonalinformationfromme.Iamconcernedthat___willusemypersonalinformationforotherpurposeswithoutmyauthorization.Iamconcernedthat___willsharemypersonalinformationwithotherswithoutmypermission.Iamconcernedthatunauthorizedpersons(i.e.hackers)haveaccesstomypersonalinformation.Iamconcernedabouttheprivacyofmypersonalinformationduringatransaction.Trustinvendor(adaptedfromFangetal.,2014)Ibelievethatthevendoron___isconsistentinqualityandservice.Ibelievethatthevendoron___iskeenonfulfillingmyneedsandwants.Ibelievethatthevendoron___ishonest.Ibelievethatthevendoron___wantstobeknownasonethatkeepspromisesandcommitments.Ibelievethatthevendoron___hasmybestinterestsinmind.Ibelievethatthevendoron___istrustworthy.Ibelievethatthevendoron___hashighintegrity.Ibelievethatthevendoron___isdependable.Trustinwebsite(Thatcheretal.,2013)Ithink___isveryreliable.
Journal of Global Information ManagementVolume 28 • Issue 1 • January-March 2020
186
Tome,___isdependable.___performsinapredictableway.Ithink___hasthefunctionalityIneed.___hastheabilitytodowhatIwantittodo.Overall,___hasthecapabilitiesIneed.Repeatpurchaseintention(Chiuetal.,2014;Gefen,2002)Iplantocontinueusing___forcross-borderpurchase.Iconsider___tobemyfirstchoiceforcross-bordertransactionsinthefuture.ItislikelythatIwillcontinuepurchasingproductsfrom___inthefuture.Iwouldrecommend___toothers.Iwouldencourageotherstouse___.Iaminclinedtodomorebusinesswith___.
APPENdIX C: CoMMoN METHod BIAS
Harman’sone-factortestisoneofthewidelyemployedtechniquestotestcommonmethodbias.Theauthorsfirstcheckedforcommonmethodbiasbyperformingthistest(Podsakoff&Organ,2006).Anexploratoryfactoranalysisofallthescaleitemsrevealedfactorsexplaining77.8%ofthevarianceinthisstudy’sconstructs,withthefirstfactorexplaining29.7%,andthelastexplaining3.0%ofthetotalvariance.Theseresultssuggestthatnosinglefactorexplainedamajorityofthevariance,thussupportingtheideathatcommonmethodbiaswasnotathreattothisstudy.Secondly,theauthorsfollowedtherecommendationsproposedbyRönkköandYlitalo(2011)usingthePLSmarkervariableapproach.Theauthorscalculatedthemeancorrelationbetweenthemarkeritemsandthestudyitemsandfoundthatthemeancorrelationis0.06,whichisslightlyhigherthantherecommendedvalueof0.05.Then,amethodfactorwasalsocreatedusingthemarkerindicatorsasanexogenousvariablepredictingendogenousconstructinthemodel.Theauthorscomparedthemethodfactormodelwiththebaselinemodelandfoundthatthesignificantpathsinthebaselinemodelremainsignificantinthemethodfactormodel.Hence,thePLSmarkervariableapproachrevealsthatcommonmethodbiasmightnotbeathreatinthedataofthisstudy.Inaddition,theauthorsfoundthehighestcorrelationis0.689,whichislowerthanthethresholdvalueof0.9(Pavlou,Liang,&Xue,2007).Insum,alltheseevaluationsindicatethattheCMVisnotathreatofthisstudy.
APPENdIX d: RELIABILITy ANd VALIdITy
Theauthorsappropriatelytestedforthereliabilityandvalidityofthemeasurementmodel.Theresults,includingmean,standarddeviation(SD),averagevarianceextracted(AVE),compositereliability(CR),andCronbach’salphavalue,areshowninTable4.Allitemswereloadedintheirexpectedconstructswiththevalueabove0.7withtheexceptionofAWQ1(0.687)(seeAppendixA).TheAVEvalueforeachconstructwasabovetherecommendedthresholdvalueof0.5.Allconstructreliabilitiesfit between 0.855–0.978, exceeding the criterion of 0.7. Therefore, composite reliability of themeasurementmodelwasconfirmed.TheCronbach’salphavaluewastestedtoverifythereliability.AllCronbach’salphavalueswereabovetherecommendedvalueof0.7.Usingthesebenchmarks,themeasurementmodelissuitableforsubsequentanalysis.Table5showsthecorrelationsbetweeneachconstruct.Toprovediscriminantvalidityofthemodel,thesquarerootofAVEwascomparedwithintercorrelationsofeachconstruct.AllthesquarerootsofAVEexceededtherespectivecorrelation;discriminantvaliditywasconfirmed.
Journal of Global Information ManagementVolume 28 • Issue 1 • January-March 2020
187
Table 4. Results of reliability, validity and means of the construct
Variable Items Mean S.D. AVE CR Alpha value
Alternativewebsitequality(AWQ)
AWQ1
3.051 0.853 0.690 0.917 0.893
AWQ2
AWQ3
AWQ4
AWQ5
Customerdutiescost(CD)CD1
2.938 1.345 0.908 0.952 0.904CD2
Confiscationrisk(CR)
CR1
2.694 1.301 0.846 0.956 0.951CR2
CR3
CR4
Deliveryrisk(DR)
DR1
2.626 1.094 0.706 0.923 0.897
DR2
DR3
DR4
DR5
Financialrisk(FR)FR4
2.656 1.203 0.751 0.855 0.781FR5
Privacyrisk(PC)
PC1
2.711 1.165 0.804 0.953 0.941
PC2
PC3
PC4
PC5
Repurchaseintention(RPI)
RPI1
3.957 1.060 0.850 0.971 0.964
RPI2
RPI3
RPI4
RPI5
RPI6
Trustinprovider(TP)
TV1
3.500 1.056 0.850 0.978 0.975
TV2
TV3
TV4
TV5
TV6
TV7
TV8
Trustinwebsite(TW)
TW1
3.770 0.989 0.855 0.973 0.966
TW2
TW3
TW4
TW5
TW6
Journal of Global Information ManagementVolume 28 • Issue 1 • January-March 2020
188
Jian Mou is a Lecturer of the School of Economics and Management, Xidian University. His research interests include e-commerce, human computer interaction, trust and risk issues in e-service and the dynamic nature in systems use. His research has been published in Computers in Human Behavior, Electronic Commerce Research, Information Development, Behaviour and Information Technology, IT & People, International Journal of Human-Computer Interaction and Information Technology and Tourism, as well as in the proceedings such as ICIS, ECIS and PACIS.
Yi Cui is a lecturer of School of Economics and Management, Communication University of China. His research focuses on electronic commerce, organizational culture and technology adoption.
Kerry Kurcz earned a Bachelor of Science in Information and Decision Science from the University of Illinois at Chicago in 2018. Shortly after graduation, she started working for Chicago-based insurance company CNA as a data engineer and application developer.
Table 5. Construct correlations (Diagonal bold values are square root of AVE)
AWQ CD CR DR FR PC RPI TV TW
AWQ 0.831
CD 0.295 0.953
CR 0.262 0.608 0.920
DR 0.311 0.492 0.603 0.840
FR 0.291 0.561 0.510 0.539 0.867
PC 0.315 0.368 0.486 0.541 0.425 0.897
RPI -0.263 -0.143 -0.128 -0.317 -0.155 -0.172 0.922
TV -0.133 -0.099 -0.113 -0.202 -0.106 -0.096 0.609 0.922
TW -0.123 -0.144 -0.088 -0.252 -0.161 -0.128 0.689 0.665 0.925