Troponin Testing Today - ASCLS - MOascls-mo.org/documents/Spring Meeting/Presentation...
Transcript of Troponin Testing Today - ASCLS - MOascls-mo.org/documents/Spring Meeting/Presentation...
Jen Quaglia BSN, RNMedical Scientific LiaisonRoche Diagnostics
Troponin Testing Today
1
• Jen Quaglia BSN, RN is an employee of Roche Diagnostics within the division of Medical Scientific Affairs
• Data presented is intended for purely educational use to provide the participant with scientific, evidenced-based data in compliance with FDA guidelines
All Trademarks, trade names, images, or logos mentioned or used herein are the property of their respective owners and are not used for purposes of promotion or as an indication of affiliation with
the provider of any particular good or service.
Disclosures
2
• Describe the biochemical and physiological effects of
the cardiac troponin system
• Identify biological and physiological factors for
consideration in the clinical application of troponin
measurements in acute and chronic disease settings
• Analyze evidenced-based clinical outcome data related
to the diagnostic and prognostic impact of troponin use
in primary and acute care settings
Objectives
3
The Troponin Complex
• Troponin I & T are not interchangeable
• Troponin I and I are not interchangeable
• Point of Care Troponin I is not interchangeable with Central Lab Troponin
T
5
Cardiac Troponin Subunits in Circulation
• Cardiac Myocyte
– Bound-Pool
– Free Pool
TnT ~6-8 %
TnI ~3-4 %
• Circulation
– Free form release of TnT and TnI
– T-I-C complex dissociation and degradation
• Binary I-C: Predominant form
• Free TnT
• Subunits
Release patterns of cardiac troponin found in circulation after myocyte necrosis
Januzzi, J.L. et al: “Cardiac Biomarkers in Clinical Practice”. Jones and Bartlett Publishers 2011; Chapter 1, pg 4.
Freda et al., J. Am Coll Cardiol 2002; 40:2065 (Modified Illustration)
Circulation
6
Cardiac Troponin Subunits in Circulation
• Cardiac Myocyte
– Bound-Pool
– Free Pool
TnT ~6-8 %
TnI ~3-4 %
• Circulation
– Free form release of TnT
and TnI
– T-I-C complex dissociation and degradation
• Binary I-C: Predominant form
• Free TnT
• Subunits
Release patterns of cardiac troponin found in circulation after myocyte necrosis
Circulation
Januzzi, J.L. et al: “Cardiac Biomarkers in Clinical Practice”. Jones and Bartlett Publishers 2011; Chapter 1, pg 4.
Freda et al., J. Am Coll Cardiol 2002; 40:2065 (Modified Illustration)
7
Cardiac Troponin Subunits in Circulation
• Cardiac Myocyte
– Bound-Pool
– Free Pool
TnT ~6-8 %
TnI ~3-4 %
• Circulation
– Free form release of TnT and TnI
– T-I-C complex dissociation and degradation
• Binary I-C: Predominant form
• Free TnT
• Subunits
Release patterns of cardiac troponin found in circulation after myocyte necrosis
Circulation
Januzzi, J.L. et al: “Cardiac Biomarkers in Clinical Practice”. Jones and Bartlett Publishers 2011; Chapter 1, pg 4.
Freda et al., J. Am Coll Cardiol 2002; 40:2065 (Modified Illustration)
8
Cardiac Troponin Detection
Amino acid 1
125 131 136 147
288
Epitope
M7 M11-7
30 110
211
Affinity for Proteolysis
Central Stable Area
Roche Elecsys and Cobas Troponin T Package Insert. 2010-08 V6
Sodi R., Advances in Clinical Chemistry 2006; 41;49-122.Katrukha, AG et al., 1998 Clin Chem 44(12);2433-2440 www.ifcc.org/index.asp/Scientific_Activities/SD_Committees/Standardisation of Markers of Cardiac Damage; “Troponin Assay Analytical Characteristics”
September 2009 version
Cardiac Troponin T
N C
Epitope Binding Sites
Affinity for Proteolysis
Amino acid 1
N C
Cardiac Troponin I
Antibody/epitope site selection
Single Manufacturer Multiple Manufacturers
N-terminal region Stable Area Affinity for
Proteolysis
9
Troponin Assay Analytical Variability
Adapted from: www.ifcc.org/index.asp/Scientific_Activities/SD_Committees/Standardisation of Markers of Cardiac Damage;
“Troponin Assay Analytical Characteristics” September 2009 version
IFCC : Analytical characteristics of commercial cardiac troponin I and T assays
per Manufacturer
Tro
po
nin
ch
an
ge
(%
)
0 200 400 600 800 1,000 1,200 1,400 1,600 1,800
Hemolysis index
cTnT: false negatives
180
120
60
0
-20
-40
-60
cTnI: false positives
Effects of Hemolysis on cTn
Bais, Clin Chem 2010; 56: 1357-9
11
Areas of Confusion…..
• Changing Definition of MI
• How to interpret results
• Ever evolving Troponin Assays
Improved analytical precision
Improved ability to detect smaller concentrations
of Troponin
Different threshold values
Detection of Troponin in patients not
experiencing classical MI symptoms
• When to order a Troponin level
Good intentions may lead to unnecessary testing
Here and Now
12
Defining Myocardial Infarction
1959 • WHO develops a definition of AMI to track prevalence and prognosis
Initially only clinical Symptoms and ECG changes were included with markers
of myocardial necrosis as secondary criteria
• CK and CK-MB are the “gold standard” biomarkers for the definition of cardiac
injury
• Troponin T Assay (Boehringer-Mannheim) & Troponin I Assay (Dade Behring)
approved by FDA.
• Consensus committee statement of the Joint European Society of Cardiology and
the American College of Cardiology (ESC/ACC) redefinition of MI; Implied that any
necrosis in the setting of myocardial ischemia should be labeled as an MI. Cardiac
Troponin T or I as the preferred Biomarker for diagnosis of MI.
• Global Task Force further refined the definition of MI and emphasized the different
conditions which might lead to an MI
• The Third Universal Definition of MI
2012
2000
1994-95
2007
Historical perspective
Morrow, D.A. et al: “Cardiovascular Biomarkers, Pathophysiology and Disease Management”. Humana Press 2006: Chapter 3, pg 42.ESC/ACC 2000 Myocardial infarction redefined – a consensus document for the redefinition of myocardial infarction. JACC,2000; 36:959–
969. Thygesen, K. et al.:
Universal Definition of Myocardial Infarction. JACC 2007; 50: 273 – 295. ACC/AHA 2012 Third Universal Definition of Myocardial Infarction: JACC. 2012, Vol.60, No.16..
1971-86
13
3rd Universal Definition of Myocardial Infarction
Detection of a rise and/or fall of cardiac biomarkers (preferably troponin) with at least 1 value above the 99th percentile reference limit together with
evidence of myocardial ischemia and at least 1 of the
following:
• Ischemic symptoms
• ECG changes indicative of new ischemia
• Pathological Q waves
• Imaging evidence of new loss of viable myocardium or new
regional wall motion abnormality
• IC thrombus identified by angiography or autopsy
Timing is essential, serial testing recommended
Thygesen et al: Universal Definition of Myocardial Infarction. Circulation 2012;126:2020-2035
14
3rd Universal Definition of Myocardial Infarction
Detection of a rise and/or fall of cardiac biomarkers (preferably troponin) with at least 1 value above the
99th percentile reference limit together with evidence
of myocardial ischemia and at least 1 of the following:
• Ischemic symptoms
• ECG changes indicative of new ischemia
• Pathological Q waves
• Imaging evidence of new loss of viable myocardium or new
regional wall motion abnormality
• IC thrombus identified by angiography or autopsy
Timing is essential, serial testing recommended
Thygesen et al: Universal Definition of Myocardial Infarction. Circulation 2012;126:2020-2035
15
Point #1: Rise and/or Fall of Biomarkers (cTn)
Jaffe et al., J Am Coll Cardiol; 2006;48:1-11.
16
3rd Universal Definition of Myocardial Infarction
Detection of a rise and/or fall of cardiac biomarkers
(preferably troponin) with at least 1 value above the 99th percentile reference limit together with
evidence of myocardial ischemia and at least 1 of the
following:
• Ischemic symptoms
• ECG changes indicative of new ischemia
• Pathological Q waves
• Imaging evidence of new loss of viable myocardium or new
regional wall motion abnormality
• IC thrombus identified by angiography or autopsy
Timing is essential, serial testing recommended
Thygesen et al: Universal Definition of Myocardial Infarction. Circulation 2012;126:2020-2035
17
Point #2: Use of the 99th PercentileHow sensitive do Troponin assays really need to be?
• Requirement of troponin assays:
• Aid in diagnosing patients with AMI as early as possible
• Identify patients at risk of premature death from CVD
• To do this accurately, assays require acceptable precision
within the normal range
• Quantitate a high percentage of normal subjects
• Keep interferences minimal (hemolysis, heterophile Abs)
18
Universal Definition of Myocardial Infarction Thresholds
Adapted from Fox, Keith AA, “High Sensitivity Troponin, Strengths and Weaknesses”. Presented @ ESC Congress 26-08-2012.
Diagnosis of MI
“Normal” Population”
99th centile
(Universal Definition)
4th
generation
assay
3rd
generation
assay
WHO
definition
19
gen = generation; hs = high sensitivity
Apple, FS Clin Chem 2009; 55(7):1303-6
Cardiac Troponin Assay Scorecard
Acceptance Designation Total Precision at 99th Percentile
Guideline Acceptable < 10%
Clinically Usable >10 to < 20%
Not Acceptable > 20%
Assay Designation Measurable Normal Values Below the 99th Percentile
Level 4
3rd gen hs
> 95%
Level 3
2nd gen hs
75 to < 95%
Level 2
1st gen hs
50 to <75%
Level 1
Contemporary
<50%
19
20
3rd Universal Definition of Myocardial Infarction
Detection of a rise and/or fall of cardiac biomarkers
(preferably troponin) with at least 1 value above the
99th percentile reference limit together with evidence
of myocardial ischemia and at least 1 of the following:
Ischemic symptoms
• ECG changes indicative of new ischemia
• Pathological Q waves
• Imaging evidence of new loss of viable myocardium or new
regional wall motion abnormality
• IC thrombus identified by angiography or autopsy
Timing is essential, serial testing recommended
Thygesen et al: Universal Definition of Myocardial Infarction. Circulation 2012;126:2020-2035
21
MIM
Acute cTn elevation (with rise and/or fall
in cTn over serial measurement)
Myocardial
Injury
MyocardialInfarction
Point #3: Serial Sampling Increases SpecificityAcute and chronic release of cardiac Troponin
Thygesen K et al.. ESC/ACCF/AHA/WHF Task Force J Am Coll Cardiol 2012; 60(16):1581-98. & Eur Heart J 2012; 33:2551–67
Chronic cTn elevation (no acute changes)
Renal
failure
Non-cardiac
major procedure
Cardiac
procedure
Heart
failure
Tachy-/brady-
arrhythmia
22
Modified from Mahajan, V.S. et al.: “How to Interpret Elevated Cardiac Troponin Levels”. Circulation. 2011;124:2350-2354.
Interpretation of Troponin ElevationsKinetic pattern of cardiac markers: rise and fall pattern
23
2014 NSTE-ACS Management GuidelinesRecommendations for use of cardiac biomarkers
Amsterdam, E., et al, 2014 AHA_ACC Guideline for the Mgmt of Pts with NSTEMI ACS, Circulation 2014
24
2014 NSTE-ACS Management GuidelinesRecommendations for use of cardiac biomarkers
Amsterdam, E., et al, 2014 AHA_ACC Guideline for the Mgmt of Pts with NSTEMI ACS, Circulation 2014
25
2014 NSTE-ACS Management GuidelinesRecommendations for use of cardiac biomarkers
Amsterdam, E., et al, 2014 AHA_ACC Guideline for the Mgmt of Pts with NSTEMI ACS, Circulation 2014
26
2014 AHA/ACC NSTE-ACS Guidelines:
0, and 3 – 6 hours1
Universal Definition of MI:
0, 3, 6 hours2
1. Amsterdam, E., et al, 2014 AHA_ACC Guideline for the Mgmt of Pts with NSTEMI ACS, Circulation 2014
2. Thygesen K, Alpert JS, Jaffe AS, et al. Third universal definition of myocardial infarction. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2012;60(16):1581-
1598.
Guidelines and Guidance DocumentsRecommended frequency of troponin testing
27
Emphasis on assessment of serial cTn changes:
• Required: cTn value above the 99th percentile of the URL
• Evidence for an acute increase or decrease ≥20% isrequired if the initial value is elevated
2014 NSTE-ACS Management Guidelines
Amsterdam, E., et al, 2014 AHA_ACC Guideline for the Mgmt of Pts with NSTEMI ACS, Circulation 2014
Diagnosis
• Goal:•Identify patients with disease
•Exclude patients without disease
• Clinical Questions•ACS versus non-ACS etiology
•MI versus unstable angina
•Type I MI (spontaneous) vs.
•Type II MI (secondary)
Risk Stratification
• Goal:•Independent association with outcomes
•Improved prognosis / stratification beyond est. tools
• Clinical Questions•What are risks of CV death, SCD, MI, recurrent ischemia, HF, stent thrombosis
Clinical Implication
• Goal:•The test results changes treatment decisions
• Clinical Questions•Does specific test result change clinical practice (e.g. admission, catheterization, antithrombotic therapy, early discharge, ICD replacement
Flowchart modified from Scirica, JACC 2010; 55 (14): 1403
Cardiac Troponin’s Role In Patient Assessment
Clinical utility covers a wide range of clinical applications
29
Serial Troponin Values Grouped by Final Diagnosis
Troponin T – 0 hours
Keller T, Zeller T, Peetz D, et al. Sensitive troponin I assay in early diagnosis of acute myocardial infarction. N Engl J Med. 2009;361(9):868-877.
Troponin T – 3 hours
30
Diagnostic Accuracy 3 Hours After Admission
Troponin T
Keller T, Zeller T, Peetz D, et al. Sensitive troponin I assay in early diagnosis of acute myocardial infarction. N Engl J Med. 2009;361(9):868-877.
Risk Stratification in ACS PatientsP
erc
en
tag
e
James, S.K. et al: Am J Med 2003; 115: 178- 184
22
# Patients/group 1,992 571 873 3,679
Evaluated Cutoff Points for Troponin T
30 day risk of death or MI in the GUSTO IV trial
31
32
Cannon CP, Weintraub WS, Demopoulos LA et al. Comparison of early invasive and conservative strategies in patients with
unstable coronary syndromes treated with the glycoprotein IIb/IIIa inhibitor Tirofiban. NEJM. 2001; 344: 1879-1887.
TACTICS TIMI 18 and Clinical Implications50% reduction in death and MI at 30 days
TnT > 0.01 ng/ml TnT ≤ 0.01 ng/ml
• Troponin levels are of value when they contribute to
accurate diagnosis or inform prognosis.
• Clinically useful Interpretation of Tn levels in:
• Chronic Kidney Disease (CKD)
• Heart Failure
• Pulmonary Embolism (PE)
• Chemotherapy-Associated Cardiac Toxicity
• Sepsis
Interpretation of Troponin ElevationsNonischemic cardiac Troponin elevations
.
ACCF 2012 Expert Consensus Document on Practical Considerations in the Interpretation of Troponin Elevations: JACC. 2012, Vol.60, No.23.
Morrow, D.A. et al: “Cardiovascular Biomarkers, Pathophysiology and Disease Management”. Humana Press 2006: Chapter 10, pg 141,145-149.
Nonischemic Troponin ElevationsDetectable levels of Troponin are prognostic
CHF
Pulmonary Edema
Sepsis During ICU Stay
Non-Cardiac, Critically ill ED Patients
Acute Stroke
Postoperative Vascular Surgery
34
Aim: Assess Troponin concentrations in CKD patients not on
dialysis
Methods: N=222, follow-up 19 months, CKD Stages 3-5,
Echocardiogram
Results:
• TnT levels above 99th Percentile in 43% of patients vs 18% with
TnI
• TnT and TnI are more commonly increased in presence of more
severe CKD
• Decreasing GFR increased odds of having detectable TnT but
not TnI
• TnT is a marker of decreased survivalAbbas, N.A. et al: Clin Chem 2005: 51:11
Nonischemic Troponin ElevationsKidney disease
“Cardiac Troponins and Renal Function in Nondialysis Patients with Chronic Kidney Disease”
35
• TnT differed significantly
between CKD stages ( p
= <0.0001)
• Increased TnT associated with
reduced eGFR
• OR 0.939 (CI 0.916 – 0.963)
( p = <0.001)
% c
Tn
Le
ve
l>
99%
0%
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
60%
CKD 3 CKD 4 CKD 5
TnT
Tn I
20%
11%
39%
12%
59%
26%
Abbas. (2005). Clin Chem. 51(11)
Percentage of Patient exceeding > 99th Percentile Tn level
as compared by CHD Stage
“Cardiac Troponins and Renal Function in Nondialysis Patients with Chronic Kidney Disease”
• TnI differed significantly between
CKD stages 4 & 5 ( p = 0.0197)
But not between CKD stages 3 & 4.
• Increased TnI associated with
reduced eGFR
– OR 0.961 (CI 0.931 – 0.992)
( p = 0.015)
CKD 3 (GFR <60-30)
CKD 4 (GFR 29-15)
CKD 5 (GFR <15 or “ON
DIALYSIS”)
Conclusions:
• TnT and TnI elevations are common in pre-dialysis CKD patients, without ACS
• Detectable TnT was marker of decreased survival
Nonischemic Troponin ElevationsKidney disease
36
• Guidelines play a key role in the management ACS
• Troponins play a crucial role in the aid of diagnosis and prognosis
• Troponin levels are not stand-alone tests
• Both TnT and TnI are cardiac specific antigens
• No correlation among different TnI assays can be
expected unless they use the same antibody pairs
Troponin TestingConclusions
37
38
• Facilitate cTn Assay Understanding:
Educate Medical Staff (Clinicians, Nurses, Pharmacist,
etc.)
Performance characteristics
Threshold limits
Interpretation of results
• Ischemic
• Non-ischemic
Interpretation of Troponin Elevations “Laboratorians’ Call to Action”
1Rollins, G. “New, Practical Guidance for Cardiac Troponin-How Can Laboratorians Help Physicians? Clinical Lab News 2013
39:1-4
Reduce the Confusion
• Describe the biochemical and physiological effects of
the cardiac troponin system
• Identify biological and physiological factors for
consideration in the clinical application of troponin
measurements in acute and chronic disease settings
• Analyze evidenced-based clinical outcome data related
to the diagnostic and prognostic impact of troponin use
in primary and acute care settings
Objectives
39