TRIZ Body of Knowledge

8/12/2019 TRIZ Body of Knowledge

1/9

1/9

TRIZ BODY OF KNOWLEDGE

Simon Litvin, Vladimir Petrov, Mikhail Rubin

International TRIZ Association (MA TRIZ)

Victor Fey

Altshuller Institute for TRIZ Studies

INTRODUCTION

As the worldwide appreciation for TRIZ grows, its further development as a science is hindered bya number of factors. One of these factors concerns the somewhat fuzzy boundaries of TRIZ.

Unfortunately, there are currently no TRIZ textbooks or training programs that are universally

accepted by the global TRIZ community. This leads to significant differences in the interpretationof some key concepts, tools and approaches of TRIZ (and in some cases to their corruption). In

addition, these discrepancies make it difficult to meet an increasingly tangible need for a globally

authoritative certification of TRIZ practitioners.

To improve the situation, the International TRIZ Association (MA TRIZ), the Altshuller Institute

for TRIZ Studies (AI), and the European TRIZ Association (ETRIA) have mutually agreed todefine the TRIZ Body of Knowledge.

Hardly any scientific association, even the most respected and established one, is able to define with

utmost certainty the boundaries of its subject science. Any science, TRIZ included, is an evolvingentity, with its boundaries constantly being pushed forward. However, it is possible (and necessary)

to identify and describe those elements of the sum total of knowledge in the given science that

constitute its core and are accepted by the majority of leading experts.

Logically, a compilation of the body of knowledge of any scientific discipline should begin with the

identification of its most important postulates. It should also involve the identification of thisdisciplines structure. However, we realize that it will take a tremendous effort on the part of many

experts to reach consensus on a set of axioms for TRIZ and its structure. It will also take a

concerted collective effort to develop a comprehensive body of knowledge comprising the emerging

science of TRIZ. This document represents a starting point for such a project. In preparing thisdocument, we not only intend to lay the foundation for defining the boundaries and content of

modern TRIZ, but also hope to open a discussion on these topics among the people for whom TRIZ

has become a profession. We believe that such a discussion is necessary for the healthydevelopment of TRIZ.

We are thankful to Lyubov Kozhevnikova, Oleg Gerasimov, Alexander Kislov, Alexander Gasanov,Isak Bukhman, Zinovy Royzen, Boris Zlotin, and Alla Zusman for their assistance in preparing this

material.

Thus, the main goals of this document are the following:1. Identify the basic concepts, components, and tools of TRIZ,2. Foster further advancement of TRIZ by improving the understanding of its fundamentals.3. Provide an objective basis for the certification of TRIZ specialists to minimize disputes

concerning the requisite knowledge mandatory for specialist certification of one level or

another.


2/9

2/9

SELECTION CRITERIA

In order to be included in the TRIZ Body of Knowledge, a TRIZ concept, component or tool must

satisfy the following criteria:

A. It has to be used by the majority of TRIZ schools in the world (not surprisingly, most ofthese elements of TRIZ were either authored and co-authored by or were developed in close

collaboration with Genrikh Altshuller).B. It has to be used in the majority of non-commercial publications on TRIZ authored by TRIZ

Masters

C. It has to be used in the majority of TRIZ courses presently offered in the world.

Presently, there are several new developments based on classical TRIZ, such as I-TRIZ,

TRIZplus, TRIZ-OTSM, and some others. Although some of these developments are used by many

TRIZ practitioners, they have not yet attained the status of being universally accepted and, therefore,are not included in this document.

This document contains the elements of TRIZ that are applicable mostly to technological systems.Those TRIZ elements that can be used primarily in non-technological areas (e.g., social sciences,

art, pedagogy, etc.) may be the subject of some future codification effort. Altshullers other piece,Theory of Creative Personality Development, is also not included in the TRIZ Body of Knowledge.

WHAT IS TRIZ?

Premise: Theevolution of successful technological systems is not random, but is governed by certain

laws or prevailing trends.

Contemporary TRIZ is both a theory of technology evolution and a methodology for the effective

development of new technological systems. It has two major subsystems based on the laws

(prevailing trends) of technological system evolution: a set of methods for developing conceptualsystem designs and a set of tools for the identification and development of next-generation

technologies and products.

TRIZ methods are based upon prevailing trends of system evolution (predominantly, technological

systems). These trends were identified by examining statistically significant information fromdifferent areas of intellectual activities (mainly, technological innovation).

Important note:The names of some concepts and tools developed and used in TRIZ coincide with

those in other approaches for enhancing engineering productivity that were developed independentlyof, and sometimes even before TRIZ. One example is Value Engineering Analysis (VEA),

developed by Lawrence Miles and Yuri Sobolev: some of its approaches and tools arefundamentally different from those named identically in TRIZ.


3/9

3/9

Basic TRIZ Concepts, Components, and Tools

1. Foundational concepts1.1. Dialectics as a philosophical foundation of TRIZ [1]1.2. Directional evolution of technological systems [2]1.3. Technological system [3].

1.4. Functions [4].1.5. Ideal technological system [5].1.6. Substance, field, sufield [6]. Substance-field resources [7].1.7. Reflectivity principle [8].1.8. Ideal substance [9].1.9. Ideal final result (IFR) [10]1.10. Inventive situation. Inventive problem [11].1.11. Levels of inventions [5].1.12. Contradictions: administrative, engineering, and physical [12].

1.13. System operator. Multi-screen scheme of talented thinking [13].

2. Trends (laws) and sub-trends (lines) of technological system evolution [14]2.1.Trend of increasing degree of ideality [14]

2.1.1. Mechanisms of increasing the ideality of technological systems [15]2.2.Trend of non-uniform evolution of sub-systems [14].2.3.Trend of completeness of system parts [14].

2.3.1. Sub-trend of elimination of human involvement [16].2.4.Trend of energy conductivity of systems [13].2.5.Trend of harmonization of rhythms [13].

2.5.1. Sub-trends of chronokinematics [17]2.6.Trend of transition to super-systems [14]

2.6.1. Sub-trend of transition from mono- to bi- and poly-systems [18]2.6.2. Sub-trend of increasing structurization of voids [19].2.6.3. Mechanisms of convolution (trimming) of technological systems. Coefficient of

convolution [20]2.6.4. Sub-trend of deployment convolution [21]2.6.5. Trimming of technological systems [22].2.6.6. Integration of alternative systems [22].

2.7.Trend of increasing dynamism [23]2.7.1. Lines of increasing dynamism [24]

2.8.Trend of increasing substance-field interactions [25].2.8.1. Lines of evolution of sufields [26]

2.9.Trend of transition from macro- micro-levels [27].2.10.Trend of matching mismatching (coordination - noncoordination) [21].

2.11.The general pattern of engineering systems evolution [28].

3. Algorithm for Inventive Problems Solving (ARIZ)3.1.ARIZ a program for inventive problem solving by identifying and resolving contradictions

[29].

3.2.Main line for solving ARIZ problems and ARIZ logic [30].3.3.Structure and basic notions of ARIZ-85C [31]

3.3.1. Problems-analogs [32]


4/9

4/9

4. Substance-Field Analysis4.1.Basic concepts and rules [6].4.2.Standards for inventive problem solving [32]4.3.Structure of the system of standards. System of 76 standards [33].

4.3.1.Standards for system modification [33]4.3.2.Standards for system measuring and detection [33]

4.3.3.Standards for application of the standards [33]

5. Techniques for resolving contradictions5.1.Techniques for resolving engineering contradictions (inventive principles)

5.1.1.40 main inventive principles [34].5.1.2.10 additional inventive principles [35].5.1.3.Duality principle-anti-principle [36].5.1.4.The Contradiction Matrix [37].5.1.5.Typical diagrams of engineering contradictions [38].

5.2.Techniques for resolving physical contradictions5.2.1.Separation principles [39].5.2.2.Using the separation principles at macro- and micro-levels [40].

6. Scientific effects6.1.The concept of database of effects [41].6.2.Physical effects [42].6.3.Chemical effects [43].6.4.Geometrical effects [44].

7. System analysis methods7.1.Methods to search and formulate inventive problems [45].7.2.Flow analysis [45].7.3.Trimming (Ideal Functional Modeling) [45].7.4.Cause-effect Analysis. Formulation of key problems

[45].

7.5.Component-and-structural analysis[45].7.6.Diagnostic analysis [45].7.7.Evolutionary analysis [45]7.8.Function analysis[45].7.9.Integration of alternative systems [45].7.10. Failure-anticipation analysis [46].7.11. Super-effect identification (system improvement without solving problems [47].

1. Altshuller, G.S. The Dialectics of Inventive Activity. - Altshuller G.S. The Invention Algorithm, 2nd

edition. - M: Moskovsky Rabotchy, 1973.Zhuckov, R.F., Petrov, V.M. Modern Methods of Scientific and Engineering Creativity. Guidebook.

L.: IPK SP, 1980. (http://www.trizminsk.org/e/247009.htm)Lymarenko, A.A. TRIZ as Applied Dialectics. -TRIZ Journal, 1993.

2. Altshuller, G.S., Shapiro, R.B. On Psychology of Inventive Creativity. Problems of Psychology, Vol.6., pp. 37-49, 1956.Altshuller, G.S., Shapiro, R.B. On Psychology of Inventive Creativity. Izobretenia, The AltshullerInstitute for TRIZ Studies, 2000.

3. Salamatov, Y.P.,A System of Laws of Technology Evolution . A Chance for Adventure/ Compiled bySelyutsky, A.B. - Petrozavodsk: Karelia, 1991.


5/9

5/9

Fey, V., Rivin, E. Innovation on Demand: New Product Development Using TRIZ. CambridgeUniversity Press, 2005.

4. Gerasimov, V.M., Kalish, V.S., Karpunin, M.G., Kuzmin, A.M., Litvin, S.S. Basics of the Methodologyfor Conducting VEA: Methodological Recommendations. M.: Inform-VEA, 1991.Arel, A.T., Verbitsky, M., Devoino, I., Ikovenko, S. TechOptimizer Fundamentals. Invention Machine

Educational Services, 2002Fey, V., Rivin, E. Innovation on Demand: New Product Development Using TRIZ. CambridgeUniversity Press, 2005.

5. Altshuller, G.S. The Invention Algorithm,2nd edition. - M: Moskovsky Rabotchy, 1973.Altshuller, G.S. The Innovation Algorithm. Technical Innovation Center, Inc. Worcester, MA, 1999.

6. Altshuller, G., Gadjiev, Ch., Flickshtein, I. Introduction to Substance-Field Analysis. - Baku, OLMI,1973.Altshuller, G. Sufield Analysis.: Methodological Guidelines. - Baku, OLMI, 1973.Altshuller, G., Flickshtein, I. Problem Solving Using Sufield Analysis. Baku: OLMI, 1973.Altshuller, G.S. Principles of Sufield Analysis. Altshuller, G.S. Creativity as an Exact Science.Theory of Inventive Problem Solving . - M.: Sovietskoje radio, 1979.Altshuller, G.S. Principles of Sufield Analysis. Altshuller G.S., Creativity as an Exact Science,Gordon and Breach, NY, NY, 1988.Altshuller G.S., Selyutsky, A.B. Wings for Icarus: How to solve inventive problems. Petrozavodsk:Karelia, 1980. 224 p. (p. 58-72).Altshuller G.S. To Find an Idea: Introduction to the Theory of Inventive Problem Solving. -

Novosibirsk.: Nauka, 1986.Altshuller G.S. The Concept of Sufield. - Altshuller G.S. Daring Formulae of Creativity.- DaringFormulae of Creativity/ (Compiled by Selyutsky, A.B.). Petrozavodsk: Karelia, 1987. 269 p. (Engineering - Young people - Creativity), p. 67-74.Petrov, V.Structural Sufield Analysis... http://www.trizland.ru/trizba.php?id=111.Altshuller G., Zlotin, B., Zusman A., Filatov V. Tools of Classical TRIZ. Ideation International Inc.1999.Fey, V., Rivin, E. Innovation on Demand: New Product Development Using TRIZ, CambridgeUniversity Press, 2005.

7. Altshuller, G.S.Algorithm for Inventive Problem Solving (ARIZ-85C). Methodological meterials fortrainees of the seminar "Methods for solving scientific and engineering problems" - L.: Leningrad MetalWorks - 1985. - 123 p. http://www.altshuller.ru/triz/ariz85v.asp.Altshuller, G.S.ARIZ Means Victory: Algorithm for Inventive Problem Solving ARIZ-85C.- Rules for a

Game Without Rules / Compiled by Selyutsky, A.B. - Petrozavodsk: Karelia, 1989.Zlotin, B.L., Vishnepolskaya, S.V. Use of Resources in Search for New Engineering Solutions.Kishinev, 1985.Petrov, V.. Principles of the Theory of Resource Utilization. L.: 1985.Royzen, Z. Specific Features of Resources Utilization for Problem Solving and Improving ObtainedSolutions. Kishinev, 1986.Petrov, V.. A Technology of Resource Utilization. Theory and practice of teaching engineeringcreativity. Abstracts of scientific papers. Chelyabinsk: UDNTP, 1988. p. 55-56.

8. Khotimliansky, Y.The Reflectivity Principle and its Application for Inventive Problem Solving. Baku: ThePublic Laboratory for the Innovation Methodology, 1974.

9. Kagan, E.L. The Concept of Building a Model of the Ideal Substance. Abstracts for the All-UnionScientific Conference "Problems of development of scientific and engineering creativity" (Tbilisi,September 30 - October 2, 1987). V.1 - Moscow: VSNTO, 1987. p. 96-98.Fey, V.R. In Search for the Ideal Substance. TRIZ Journal, V.1, No.1/90, p.36-41, V.1, No.2/90,

p.31-40. 1990. Also, In Search for the Ideal Substance. A Chance for Adventure, Compiled bySelyutsky, A.B. - Petrozavodsk: Karelia, 1991, p. 174-220.Salamatov, Y.P. Evolution of Substances in Technological Systems. Abstracts for the conferenceMethods of Scientific and Engineering Creativity, June 30-July 2, 1984 - Novosibirsk, p. 64-66, 1984.

10. Altshuller, G.S. Creativity as an Exact Science. Theory of Inventive Problem Solving . - M.:Sovietskoje radio, 1979.Altshuller G.S., Creativity as an Exact Science, Gordon and Breach, NY, NY, 1988.

11. Altshuller, G.S. The Process of Inventive Problem Solving: Main Stages and Mechanisms. 06.04.75(http://www.altshuller.ru/triz1.asp)Altshuller, G.S., Selyutsky, A.B. Wings for Icarus: How to Solve Inventive Problems. Petrozavodsk: Karelia, 1980.


6/9

6/9

Altshuller, G.S. The Daring Formulae of Creativity. InThe Daring Formulae of Creativity/ (Compiledby A.B.Selyutsky). Petrozavodsk: Karelia, 1987.Zhuckov, R.F., Petrov, V.M. Modern Methods of Scientific and Engineering Creativity. Guidebook.

L.: IPK SP, 1980. (http://www.trizminsk.org/e/247009.htm)12. Altshuller, G.S.Administrative, Engineering, and Physical Contradictions. - Altshuller G.S. Creativity

as an Exact Science: Theory of Inventive Problem Solving.- M., Sovietskoje Radio, 1979.13. Altshuller, G.S. The Structure of Talented Thinking. - Altshuller, G.S. Creativity as an Exact

Science. - M.: Sovietskoje radio, 1979.

Mann, D. Hands-On Systematic Innovation,CREAX Press, Ieper, Belgium, 2002.Rantanen, K., Domb, E. Simplified TRIZ, CRC Press, Boca Raton, Florida, 2002.

14. Altshuller, G.S. Laws of Engineering Systems Evolution. Baku, 20.01.1977.Altshuller, G.S. Laws of Systems Evolution. - Altshuller G.S. Creativity as an Exact Science.Theory of Inventive Problem Solving. - M.: Sovietskoje Radio, 1979(http://www.altshuller.ru/triz/zrts1.asp)Altshuller, G.S. Laws of Technological Systems Evolution. Altshuller, G.S. The Daring Formulaeof Creativity.- The Daring Formulae of Creativity. Compiled by Selyutsky, A.B. Petrozavodsk:Karelia, 1987.

15. Gerasimov, V., Litvin, S. Mechanisms for Enhancing the Ideality of Technological Systems in VEA. L.1985.Petrov, V.. Idealization of Technological Systems. - District Scientific-and-Practical Conference"Problems of Development of Scientific and Engineering Creativity of Engineers". Abstracts of reports.

Gorky, 1983, p. 60-62.

http://www.trizland.ru/trizba/pdf-books/zrts-08-ideal.pdfSalamatov, Y.P., Kondrakov, I.M. Specific Features of Ideal Technological Systems. Abstracts for theconference Methods of Scientific and Engineering Creativity, June 30-July 2, 1984 - Novosibirsk, p. 64-66, 1984.

16. Altshuller, G.S., Zlotin, B.L., Zusman, A.V., Filatov. V.I. Search for New Ideas: From Insight toTechnology - Kishinev, Cartia Moldoveniaske, 1989.Altshuller, G.S., Zlotin, B.L., Zusman, A.V., Filatov, V.I. Tools of Classical TRIZ. IdeationInternational, Southifeld, MI, 1999.

17. Fey, V.R. Chronokinematics of Technological Systems. Baku, 1988.Fey, V., Rivin, E. Innovation on Demand: New Product Development Using TRIZ. CambridgeUniversity Press, 2005.

18. Altshuller, G.S. To Find an Idea: Introduction to the Theory of Inventive Problem Solving. -Novosibirsk: Nauka, 1986.

Altshuller, G.S. Small Boundless Worlds: The Standards for Inventive Problem Solving. - A Threadin the Labyrinth/Compiled by Selyutsky, A.B.. - Petrozavodsk: Karelia, 1988.Petrov V. The Trend of Transition to Supersystems, http://www.trizland.ru/trizba/pdf-books/zrts-17-nadsyst.pdf.

19. Altshuller, G.S., Vertkin, I.M. Lines of Increasing Structurization of Voids. Baku, 1987http://www.altshuller.ru/triz/zrts5.asp.

20. Vertkin, I.M. Mechanisms of Convolution of Technological Systems. Baku, 198421. Altshuller, G.S., Zlotin, B.L., Zusman, A.V., Filatov, V.I. Search for New Ideas: From Insight to

Technology (The Theory and Practice of Inventive Problem Solving) - Kishinev, KartiaMoldoveniaske, 1989.Altshuller, G.S., Zlotin, B.L., Zusman, A.V., Filatov, V.I. Tools of Classical TRIZ. IdeationInternational, Southifeld, MI, 1999.

22. Gerasimov, V.M.,Litvin, S.S. Using the Trends of Technology Evolution in VEA of ManufacturingProcesses. - Practices of Conducting VEA in the Electrical Product Industry. Ed. by M.G.Karpunin.

M., Energoatomizdat, 1987.Gerasimov, V.M., Kalish, V.S., Karpunin, M.G., Kuzmin, A.M., Litvin, S.S. Basics of theMethodology for Conducting VEA: Methodological Recommendations.M.: Inform-VEA, 1991.Gerasimov, V.M., Litvin, S.S. A Unified System of TRIZ-VEA. TRIZ Journal, No. 3.2.92 , p.7-45.Gerasimov, V.M., Litvin, S.S. Why Does Engineering Need Pluralism? TRIZ Journal, No.1.90.

23. Altshuller, G.S. To Find an Idea: Introduction to the Theory of Inventive Problem Solving. -Novosibirsk: Nauka, 1986.Altshuller, G.S., Zlotin, B.L., Zusman, A.V., Filatov, V.I. A Search for New Ideas: From Insight toTechnology (The Theory and Practice of Inventive Problem Solving) - Kishinev, KartiaMoldoveniaske, 1989.


7/9

7/9

Altshuller, G.S., Zlotin, B.L., Zusman, A.V., Filatov, V.I. Tools of Classical TRIZ. IdeationInternational, Southifeld, MI, 1999.Fey, V., Rivin, E. Innovation on Demand: New Product Development Using TRIZ. CambridgeUniversity Press, 2005.

24. Altshuller, G.S., Vertkin, I.M. Lines of Fragmentation. Baku, 1987 http://www.altshuller.ru/triz/zrts5.asp.Salamatov, Y.P., A System of Laws of Technology Evolution . A Chance for Adventure/ Compiledby Selyutsky, A.B. - Petrozavodsk: Karelia, 1991.Altshuller, G.S., Zlotin, B.L., Zusman, A.V., Filatov, V.I. Tools of Classical TRIZ. Ideation

International, Southifeld, MI, 1999.Fey, V., Rivin, E. Innovation on Demand: New Product Development Using TRIZ. CambridgeUniversity Press, 2005.

25. Altshuller, G.S. To Find an Idea: Introduction to the Theory of Inventive Problem Solving. -Novosibirsk: Nauka, 1986.Salamatov, Y.P., A System of Laws of Technology Evolution . A Chance for Adventure/ Compiledby Selyutsky, A.B. - Petrozavodsk: Karelia, 1991.Altshuller, G.S., Zlotin, B.L., Zusman, A.V., Filatov, V.I. Tools of Classical TRIZ. IdeationInternational, Southifeld, MI, 1999.Fey, V., Rivin, E. Innovation on Demand: New Product Development Using TRIZ. CambridgeUniversity Press, 2005.

26. Vertkin, I.M. The General Pattern of Sufield Evolution. Presentation at the conference Methods ofScientific and Engineering Creativity, Novosibirsk, June 30-July 2, 1984.

Vertkin, I.M, Fey, V.R. A Study of Sufields with Thermal and Magnetic Fields in Technological Systems.Abstracts for the conference Methods of Scientific and Engineering Creativity, June 30-July 2, 1984 -Novosibirsk, p. 79-81, 1984.Altshuller, G.S. To Find an Idea: Introduction to the Theory of Inventive Problem Solving. -Novosibirsk: Nauka, 1986.Fey, V.R. In Search for the Ideal Substance. TRIZ Journal, V.1, No.1/90, p.36-41, V.1, No.2/90,p.31-40, 1990. Also, In Search for the Ideal Substance. A Chance for Adventure. Compiled bySelyutsky, A.B. - Petrozavodsk: Karelia, p. 174-220, 1991.

27. Altshuller, G.S. Creativity as an Exact Science. - M.: Sovietskoje Radio, 1979Altshuller, G.S. To Find an Idea: Introduction to the Theory of Inventive Problem Solving. -Novosibirsk: Nauka, 1986.Petrov, V. Trend of System Transition from Macro- to Microlevels. http://www.trizland.ru/trizba/pdf-books/zrts-12-microlevel.pdf.

28. Altshuller, G.S. To Find an Idea: Introduction to the Theory of Inventive Problem Solving . -Novosibirsk: Nauka, 1986.Petrov, V.. A System of Laws of Technological System Evolution. - Lecture at the seminar for TRIZinstructors and researchers (Petrozavodsk-82). L.: 1982. http://www.trizland.ru/trizba.php?id=108.Salamatov Y.P., A System of Laws of Technology Evolution . A Chance for Adventure. Compiledby Selyutsky, A.B.. - Petrozavodsk: Karelia, 1991.Salamatov, Y.P., Kondrakov, I.M. Idealization of Technological Systems. A Study and Developmentof a Spatial-Temporal Model of Technological System Evolution (a wave of idealization") based on thestudy of evolution of a technological system "heat pipe. Krasnoyarsk, 1984. http://rus.triz-guide.com/publicat/allbooks/ideal_tech_systems.html.

29. Altshuller, G.S. The History of ARIZ Evolution, 1987 http://www.altshuller.ru/triz/ariz-about1.asp.30. Zhuckov, R.F., Petrov. V.M. Modern Methods of Scientific and Engineering Creativity L.: IPK SP,

1980. http://www.trizland.ru/trizba.php?id=105.31. Altshuller, G.S.Algorithm for Inventive Problem Solving ARIZ-85C. Methodological materials for trainees

of the seminar "Methods of solving scientific and engineering problems" - L.: Leningrad Metal Works,1985 http://www.altshuller.ru/triz/ariz85v.asp.

32. Altshuller, G.S. Comments on ARIZ-85. In Altshuller, G.S.Algorithm of Inventive Problem SolvingARIZ-85. Baku, 1983.Petrov, V.. Use of Problems-Analogs in Inventive Activity. Methodological problems of engineeringactivities. Part II Engineering heuristics and technology forecasting. Riga, Znanije, 1983.Litvin, S.S. They are Unlike, but They are Similar (Problems-analogs in TRIZ). TRIZ Journal, 95.1(No.10). p. 47-50.

33. Altshuller, G.S. Creativity as an Exact Science: Theory of Inventive Problem Solving . - M.:Sovietskoje radio, 1979.


8/9

8/9

Altshuller, G.S. Principles of Sufield Analysis. Altshuller G.S., Creativity as an Exact Science,Gordon and Breach, NY, NY, 1988.Altshuller, G.S. Theory of Inventive Problem Solving. - Angarsk, 1988.http://www.altshuller.ru/engineering16.asp.Altshuller, G.S. To Find an Idea: Introduction to the Theory of Inventive Problem Solving. -Novosibirsk.: Nauka, 1986,Altshuller, G., Zlotin, B., Zusman, A., Filatov, V. Tools of Classical TRIZ. Ideation International Inc.1999.

Altshuller G.S. Small Huge Worlds: Standards for Inventive Problem Solving - A Thread in theLabyrinth/Compiled by Selyutsky, A.B. - Petrozavodsk: Karelia, 1988.http://www.altshuller.ru/triz/standards.asp.Fey, V., Rivin, E. Innovation on Demand: New Product Development Using TRIZ. CambridgeUniversity Press, 2005.Terninko, J., Domb, E., Miller, J.The Seventy Six Standard Solutions, with Examples. - http://www.triz-

journal.com/archives/2000/02/g/index.htm, http://www.triz-journal.com/archives/2000/03/d/index.htm,http://www.triz-journal.com/archives/2000/05/b/index.htm, http://www.triz-

journal.com/archives/2000/06/e/index.htm, http://www.triz-journal.com/archives/2000/07/b/index.htm.34. Altshuller, G.S. Main Techniques for Elimination of Engineering Contradictions in Inventive Problem

Solving. - Baku: Giandjlick, 1971.Altshuller, G.S. The Invention Algorithm,2

ndedition. - M: Moskovsky Rabotchy, 1973.

Altshuller, G.S. The Innovation Algorithm. Technical Innovation Center, Inc. Worcester, MA, 1999.

Altshuller, G.S. Creativity as an Exact Science. Theory of Inventive Problem Solving . - M.:Sovietskoje radio, 1979.Altshuller G.S., Creativity as an Exact Science, Gordon and Breach, NY, NY, 1988.Altshuller, G.S. Classification of the Inventive Principles: Petrozavodsk, 1985.

35. Altshuller, G.S.An Additional List of Inventive Principles. - Baku, 1971.http://www.altshuller.ru/triz/technique1a.asp.Altshuller, G.S., Brenner, M.A. Examples for the Inventive Principles. Baku, 1984.

36. Flickstein, I.M. A Study of Main Techniques for Eliminating Engineering Contradictions for InventiveProblems Solving. - Baku, 1973.Petrov, V.. Paired Inventive Principles. Leningrad, 1974. http://www.trizminsk.org/e/212002.htm.

37. Altshuller, G.S. The Invention Algorithm,2nd

edition. - M: Moskovsky Rabotchy, 1973.Altshuller, G.S. The Innovation Algorithm. Technical Innovation Center, Inc. Worcester, MA, 1999.Mann, D. Hands-On Systematic Innovation,CREAX Press, Ieper, Belgium, 2002.

Rantanen, K., Domb, E. Simplified TRIZ,CRC Press, Boca Raton, Florida, 2002.38. Altshuller, G.S.ARIZ-85C, Table 1. - Baku, 1985.39. Altshuller, G.S.ARIZ-85C, Table 2. - Baku, 1985.

Litvin S.S. Techniques for resolving physical contradictions. Leningrad, 1981.40. Altshuller G.S. Creativity as an Exact Science: TheTheory of Inventive Problem Solving. M.:

Sovietskoje radio, 1979.41. Altshuller G.S. Creativity as an Exact Science: TheTheory of Inventive Problem Solving. M.:

Sovietskoje radio, 1979.42. Gorin, Yu. Index of Physical Effects and Phenomena for Inventors. - Baku, 1973.-300 p.

http://www.triz-summit.ru/ru/section.php?docId=3672Gorin Y. Application of Physical Effects and Phenomena when Solving Inventive Problems . Baku: OLMI.Denisov, S., Yefimov, V., Zubarev, V., Kustov, V. Index of Physical Effects and Phenomena forInnvators /.- Obninsk, 1977. http://lib.web-malina.com/getbook.php?bid=1693

Borodastov, G.V., Denisov, S., Yefimov, V., Zubarev, V., Kustov, V., Goncharov, A.N. Index ofPhysical Phenomena and Effects for Solving Inventive Problems: Training Material /. M.: TheCentral Scientific Research Institute "Atominform", 1979.Magic Crystal of Physics. The Daring Formulae of Creativity/Compiled by Selyutsky, A. B.). Petrozavodsk: Karelia, 1987.

43. Salamatov, Y.P. Heroic Deeds at Molecular Level: Chemistry Helps Solve Difficult InventiveProblems. - A Thread in the Labyrinth / Compiled by Selyutsky, A.B. - Petrozavodsk: Karelia, 1988.http://rus.triz-guide.com/publicat/allbooks/feates_on_molecular_level.html.

44. Vikentiev, I.L., Yefremov, V.I.The Curve That Will Always Help You Out: Geometry for Inventors . -A Thread in the Labyrinth, Compiled by Selyutsky, A. B. - Petrozavodsk: Karelia, 1988 http://www.triz-chance.ru/geometrical_effect.html.


9/9

9/9

45. Gerasimov, V.M., Doubrov, V.Y., Karpounin, M.G., Kuzmin, A.M., Litvin, S.S. Application ofMethods of Engineering Creativity when Conducting Value Engineering Analysis: MethodologicalRecommendations. M.: "Informelectro", 1990.Gerasimov, V.M.,Litvin, S.S. Using the Trends of Technology Evolution in VEA of Manufacturing

Processes. - Practices of Conducting VEA in the Electrical Product Industry.Ed. by M.G.Karpunin. M.,Energoatomizdat, 1987.

Gerasimov, V.M., Kalish, V.S., Karpounin, M.G., Kuzmin, A.M., Litvin, S. S. Basics of theMethodology for Conducting Value Engineering Analysis: Methodological Recommendations.M.:

Inform-VEA, 1991.Gerasimov, V.M., Litvin, S.S.A Unified System of TRIZ-VEA. TRIZ Journal, No. 3.2.92, p.7-45.Gerasimov, V.M., Litvin, S.S. Why Does Engineering Need Pluralism? TRIZ Journal, No.1.90 , p.11-26.

46. Zlotin, B.L., Zusman, A.V. A Methodology for Forecasting Extraordinary Situations, Harmful andUndesirable Phenomena. Kishinev. 1991.Kaplan, S., Visnepolski S., Zlotin, B., Zusman, A.New Tools for Failure and Risk Analysis. IdeationInternational Inc. 1999.

47. Gerasimov, V.M., Litvin, S.S. Construction of Functionally Ideal Models when Conducting VEA, 1989.

TRIZ Body of Knowledge

Documents

Transcript of TRIZ Body of Knowledge