Trigger studies of SM 130 GeV Higgs in the lepton+hadron channel First pass at estimating trigger...
-
date post
15-Jan-2016 -
Category
Documents
-
view
214 -
download
0
Transcript of Trigger studies of SM 130 GeV Higgs in the lepton+hadron channel First pass at estimating trigger...
Trigger studies of SM 130 GeV Higgs
in the lepton+hadron channel
• First pass at estimating trigger efficiency
• Higgs mass reconstruction
Catalin Ciobanu, Dovid Skversky, Kevin Pitts, Tony Liss
Univ. of Illinois
Part I: Trigger Studies
Trigger tables – from Francesca’s talk
0
1
23456
LOW-LUM HIGH-LUM
Notation: 1010000 means the event fired MU20 and J200 triggers
MU20 (20)
2MU6
EM25I (30)
2EM15I (20)
J200 (290)
3J90 (130)
4J65 (90)
J60+xE60 (100+100)
TAU25+xE30 (60+60)
MU10+EM15I
This will hurt efficiency
• Too few ATLFASTB -jets!
103
104
105
104
103
105
ATLFASTB -jets + lepton
Wait! It’s even worse:73% of events with an ATLFASTB -jet have no leptons.Of the 536 evts that do have both a lepton and a -jet, about 300 are below the lepton trigger.
1986/50k= 4% - very poor
Lepton and -jet ET-integral spectra
• Investigated using one additional trigger:
• Lepton + -jet. 3 variables:
– Lepton ET
-ID flag (ATLFASTB! Remember small efficiency) -jet ET
Default Efficiency• Using Erik’s parametrization for the jets
– Not for the jets
– For the triggers use ATLFASTB info, not the ‘truth’
– Given N (N7) choose the most efficient N triggers:
Low luminosity regime:
N= 1: 0000010 0.13598000 (jet+MET)
N= 2: 1000010 0.24079999 (+muon)
N= 3: 1100010 0.32436001 (+electron)
N= 4: 1100011 0.33831999 (+taujet+MET)
N= 5: 1110011 0.34233999 (+1jet)
N= 6: 1111011 0.34255999 (+3jet)
N= 7: 1111111 0.34268001 (+4jet)
High luminosity regime:
N = 1 1000000 0.12954000 (muon)
N = 2 1100000 0.21585999 (+electron)
N = 3 1100010 0.24330001 (+jet+MET)
N = 4 1100011 0.24548000 (+taujet+MET)
N = 5 1110011 0.24738000 (+1jet)
N = 6 1111011 0.24745999 (+3jet)
N = 7 1111111 0.24745999 (+4jet)
Adding +lepton trigger
LOLUM
Max. increase: 0.5%=(34.4-34.3)/34.3
Max. increase: 2.1% = (25.3 - 24.7)/24.7
Plot: 100*[eff (11111111)-eff (11111110)] / eff (11111110)
“Perfect” -jet identification
Max. increase: 6.1% Max. increase: 33.5%= (38.1-28.6)/28.6
Plot: 100*[eff (11111111)-eff (11111110)] / eff (11111110)
Imperfect -jet identification
Plot: 100*[eff (11111111)-eff (11111110)] / eff (11111110)
as -ID efficiency is varied from 10% to 100%.
ET(lep)>5GeV
ET(lep)>5GeV
ET(-jet)>5GeV
perfect ID
ATLFB
Conclusions
• Rough pass at trigger efficiencies for H in the lepton+hadron channel
• Backgrounds?– Top pair production – Bottom pair production– W/Z+jets production– Z
• Some (all?) exist; some may have to be generated• Study improvements to S/B
– Cut on between lepton and -jet
Part II: Higgs Reconstruction
• For this study, to improve statistics, we use the ATLFAST(not-*ATLFASTB*) -jets, i.e. the ‘truth’ -ID:
abs(KFJET[i])=15
Collinear Approximation
Assume the neutrinos (1+2) that go with the lepton move along the same transverse direction as the lepton itself (no need to assume same as well)
Similar for the -jet and the other neutrino 3.
Conserve energy and momentum– Missing energy = transverse comp. of 1+2+ 3
– Solve for the transverse comp. of (1+2) and 3.
– Solve for the longitudinal comp.:
• If complex solutions, then also assume the same (fully collinear approximation). This means giving up the Pz mom. conservation in 21% of the events
e,
1+2
-jet3
Transverse plane
Leptonic and hadronic reconstruction
Needs debugging
Higgs Mass Reconstruction
4.3% events have MH>300
More Higgs plots
Collinear approximation gets better as momentumincreases:
Conclusions II
• We got a mass peak!– There may be room for improvement?
• Fit in the 110-150 range: 131.99.8 GeV
• Clean up the bugs
• New ideas for complex Pz solution cases?