Tri-C LMS workshop 20140318 handout
27
Cuyahoga Community College LMS Workshop March 18, 2014 Presented by: Phil Hill, Molly Langstaff and Michael Feldstein MindWires Consulting and e-Literate blog
Transcript of Tri-C LMS workshop 20140318 handout
Cuyahoga Community College LMS Workshop
March 18, 2014 !
!
Presented by: Phil Hill, Molly Langstaff and Michael Feldstein
MindWires Consulting and e-Literate blog
MindWires Consulting and e-Literate blog
9:30a !
Welcome, Introduc4on of MindWires, Background of project Overview of workshop Goals for Academic Technology at Tri-‐C What are you trying to accomplish with technology to support teaching and learning?
Sasha Phil Group Discussion, Michael
10:00a LMS Landscape (45 min) • LMS Market Share for HE • Technology Adop4on Curve • Holis4c view of learning plaTorm environment • Market External Forces: Private Equity, Venture Capital, Ins4tu4onal Investment
Phil
10:45a Update on LMS Vendor demos. What did we learn from demos? What ques4ons were raised by demos? (30 min)
Group Discussion
11:15a LMS Market Trends (45 min) • Future shape of LMS market • Impact of Cloud Services • Learning Analy4cs • Associated topics such as Mobile Compu4ng, eTextbooks, Courseware, and Social learning
Phil
12:00a Q&A / Lunch
1:00p LMS Market Trends – How do these trends apply to Tri-‐C and direc4ons for technology-‐enhanced instruc4on? (60 min)
Group Discussion
2:00p LMS Review Project Update & Status (60 min) ▪ Framework for project – not your typical RFP process. ▪ Status on surveys ▪ Focus groups ▪ One-‐on-‐one interviews
Phil & Sasha, Group Discussion
3:00 Wrap-‐up, next steps (15 min)
LMS Landscape
• One one hand, the market is saturated - almost all schools have standard LMS
• On the other hand, the usage of LMS is typically shallow - mostly syllabus and content sharing
• Broader faculty adoption requires more complete support
Trend: Broader Adoption
• System stability and reliability - too many outages for too long
• Feature bloat - too many features at expense of usability
• Very light or shallow adoption by faculty
• Primary benefits have been administrative
Problems in LMS Market
LMS as Hub, or Platform
• Farewell to the enterprise LMS market, hello to the Learning Platform market
• Interoperability with tools
Source: Mary Meeker / Liang Wu KPCB http://www.slideshare.net/kleinerperkins/kpcb-internet-trends-2013
LMS Market Trends
Trend: Many Market Entries, Not All
Succeed
New Market Entries
Trend: Cloud-Based Hosting
• Three primary hosting models
• Self-hosting is becoming the exception
• Vendor hosting in non-cloud-native environment growing
• Native cloud environments growing
Trend: Cloud Platforms, cont’d
• No new LMS or learning platform is being developed as enterprise system - all new are cloud platforms
• Lore designed 2 LMS systems in ~ 12 months and less than $4M investment
• Coursera and Udacity developed platform in less than 12 months
Trend: Ed Tech Market
Trend: Pricing Power
• LMS Market is much more competitive than 3 years ago
• For schools going through selection process, they often find significant cost savings (we’ve seen 50%+ in some cases)
Learning Analytics
Trend: Focus on Content / LMS Interaction
• All major academic publishers working with most major LMS solutions for deeper integration with digital content
• Rise of Courseware
• IMS / LTI Standards are key
The Course as a Product: Then and Now
Enter the of Courseware
Typical LMS Select & Implementation
Projects
LMS Selection Process RFI = Request for Information RFP = Request for Proposal
Phil Hill: [email protected] Molly Langstaff: [email protected] Michael Feldstein: [email protected] !
Web Site: http://www.mindwires.com/ !
e-Literate Blog: http://mfeldstein.com/
