Trends in Product Placement: Hyper-reality or commercial pollution?
-
Upload
grant-spanier -
Category
Business
-
view
2.093 -
download
0
Transcript of Trends in Product Placement: Hyper-reality or commercial pollution?
Undergraduate Media Conference | 04/20/12
Grant Spanier University of St. Thomas
TRENDS IN PRODUCT PLACEMENT Hyper-reality, or commercial pollution?
Undergraduate Media Conference | 04/20/12
1. Research Purpose 2. Advertising Background 3. Product Placement 4. Research
AGENDA
Undergraduate Media Conference | 04/20/12
Study the value, effects and future of product placement.
Focused exclusively on millennials (18-29)
Designed to understand millennial opinions on product placement.
PURPOSE
Undergraduate Media Conference | 04/20/12
Answer these:
How does product placement function? How effective is it? How bothersome is it to viewers? Is it morally objectionable?
PURPOSE
Undergraduate Media Conference | 04/20/12
Hyper-reality, or commercial pollution?
PURPOSE
Undergraduate Media Conference | 04/20/12
WHAT IS IT? - Embedded Advertising - Story Alteration - Product Integration - Booming Industry - Marketing Solution - Unavoidable
Movies Television (offline/online) Music Videos
Undergraduate Media Conference | 04/20/12
WHAT IS IT?
Undergraduate Media Conference | 04/20/12
WHAT IS IT?
E.T.
Undergraduate Media Conference | 04/20/12
WHAT IS IT?
65% SALES INCREASE
Undergraduate Media Conference | 04/20/12
BACKGROUND The Biggest Loser – 6,248 American Idol – 4,636 Extreme Makeover: Home Edition – 3,371 America's Toughest Jobs – 2,807 One Tree Hill – 2,575 Deal or No Deal – 2,292 America's Next Top Model – 2,241 Last Comic Standing – 1,993 Kitchen Nightmares – 1,853 Hell's Kitchen – 1,807
Most instances of Product Placement:
h"p://www.mediapost.com/publica4ons/ar4cle/120680/
$60 million + 1
1
Undergraduate Media Conference | 04/20/12
$3.1 billion in 2006
$7.6 billion in 2010
BACKGROUND
More than doubled in less than 5 years.
1
Undergraduate Media Conference | 04/20/12
WHY THE INCREASE?
Undergraduate Media Conference | 04/20/12
Death of the 30 second spot:
WHY THE INCREASE?
Undergraduate Media Conference | 04/20/12
Death of the 30 second spot:
Snowball effect—ads, ads, ads More media channels—more messages Conditioned generation
WHY THE INCREASE?
Undergraduate Media Conference | 04/20/12
Death of the 30 second spot:
DVR / skipping commercials Social Media Multi-screen viewing habits
WHY THE INCREASE?
66%
Undergraduate Media Conference | 04/20/12
Death of the 30 second spot:
DVR / skipping commercials Social Media Multi-screen viewing habits
Solution = Product Placement
WHY THE INCREASE?
66%
Undergraduate Media Conference | 04/20/12
ADVERTISING IS CHANGING.
Undergraduate Media Conference | 04/20/12
ADVERTISING IS CHANGING. CHANGED.
Undergraduate Media Conference | 04/20/12
CHANGING BEHAVIOR CHANGES MEDIA.
Undergraduate Media Conference | 04/20/12
CHANGING BEHAVIOR CHANGES ADVERTISING.
Undergraduate Media Conference | 04/20/12
Effective advertising.
Additional revenue generator.
“DVR proof.”
Lower production costs.
More realistic.
PRODUCT PLACEMENT
Pros
Undergraduate Media Conference | 04/20/12
PRODUCT PLACEMENT
Cons
More advertising messages.
Ruins integrity of creative work.
“Secret advertising.”
Undergraduate Media Conference | 04/20/12
REASEARCH METHOD Anonymous 12-question survey
100 respondents
All between 18 & 29 years old
Undergraduate Media Conference | 04/20/12
RESULTS | Media Consumption
17.7
4.2
6.5
Undergraduate Media Conference | 04/20/12
17.7
4.2
6.5
71%
29%
RESULTS | Brand Awareness | TV
Undergraduate Media Conference | 04/20/12
RESULTS | Brand Awareness | Film
17.7
4.2
6.5
71%
29%
73%
27%
Undergraduate Media Conference | 04/20/12
WHAT DOES THIS MEAN? THEY KNOW IT’S THERE.
Undergraduate Media Conference | 04/20/12
BUT HOW DO THEY FEEL ABOUT IT?
Undergraduate Media Conference | 04/20/12
BUT HOW DO THEY FEEL ABOUT IT? NOT SO BAD.
Undergraduate Media Conference | 04/20/12
RESULTS | Program Disruption | TV
17.7
4.2
6.5
71%
29%
73%
27%
72%
53%47%
28%
Undergraduate Media Conference | 04/20/12
RESULTS | Program Disruption | FILM
17.7
4.2
6.5
71%
29%
73%
27%
76%
57%
43%
24%
Undergraduate Media Conference | 04/20/12
SO, WHAT WOULD THE RESPONDENTS PREFER?
Undergraduate Media Conference | 04/20/12
A. LESS COMMERCIALS, MORE PP.
B. MORE COMMERCIALS, LESS PP.
C. NO CHANGE
Undergraduate Media Conference | 04/20/12
RESULTS | Alternative System
17.7
4.2
6.5
71%
29%
73%
27%
76%
6% 18%
Undergraduate Media Conference | 04/20/12
UNFORTUNATELY, THAT’S NOT GOING TO HAPPEN.
Undergraduate Media Conference | 04/20/12
PRODUCT PLACEMENT IS OKAY.
Undergraduate Media Conference | 04/20/12
PRODUCT PLACEMENT IS OKAY. USUALLY.
Undergraduate Media Conference | 04/20/12
A PREFERRED, LESS-INTRUSIVE FORM OF ADVERTISING.
Undergraduate Media Conference | 04/20/12
BRANDS THAT GET PLACEMENT RIGHT CAN RULE THE SPACE.
Undergraduate Media Conference | 04/20/12
IF IT BENEFITS THE SHOW, THE BRAND WILL BENEFIT.
Undergraduate Media Conference | 04/20/12
IF IT BENEFITS THE AUDIENCE, THE BRAND WILL BENEFIT.
Undergraduate Media Conference | 04/20/12
IF IT BENEFITS THE AUDIENCE, WE ALL WIN.
Undergraduate Media Conference | 04/20/12
Grant Spanier
grantspanier.com [email protected] @grantspanier
Presentation can be found online:
slideshare.com/grantspanier
THANK YOU!