TRENCHING UPDATE ON THE GIONET CU-NI PROPRobert Reukl, B.Se. Geologist
CERTIFICATION
APPENDIX I Sample Descriptions And Analytical Results From Doug McKay, MNDM, Thunder Bay
APPENDIX II Analytical Results Received From Al Guthrie, Senior Exploration Geologist, Williams Mine, Hemlo, Ontario
APPENDIX III Daily Log - Stripping SL Trenching Program
FIGURES Mining Claim Map - Cecil Township Regional Geology Map 2219 - Granitehill Lake Area Gionet Cu-Ni Occurence - Stripping And Trenching Map
TRENCHING UPDATE ON THE
SUMMARY
During the summer and fall of 1994 prospecting followed by trenching was completed on the Cecil Township property held by Gilles Gionet of Manitouwadge. This work was completed with the assistance of a grant from the Ontario Prospector's Assistance Program and was successful in discovering numerous zones of copper-nickel-cobalt mineralization. Following this initial work additional prospecting and trenching was completed during Novenmber to follow-up on the encouraging initial results. Further work is recommended.
INTRODUCTION
During the summer and fall of 1994 a program of prospecting and trenching was completed on the Cecil Township property held by Gilles Gionet of Manitouwadge. The property consists of 3 unpatented mining claims totaling approximately 224 hectares in the central portion of the Cecil Township claim map (G-2857), Thunder Bay Mining Division, Ontario (figure 1).
The program consisted of a series of prospecting traverses across the eastern portion of the property and local terrain which were thought to have potential to host mineralization similar to that which occurs elsewhere in the Manitouwadge area. This prospecting was followed by a trenching program consisting of surface stripping of two large areas discovered during the prospecting program and the blasting of several pits into these stripped off areas. This initial phase of prospecting and trenching was followed by additional prospecting and the blasting of several additional, smaller pits, which is summarized in this report. The report consists of information gathered by Gilles Gionet in the course of the work program as well as information obtained from currently available government reports.
LOCATION AND ACCESS
The claim group is located in the Thunder Bay Mining Division approximately 300 kilometers east-northeast of Thunder Bay in northwestern Ontario. More precisely the claims are found approximately 14.5 kilometers east southeast of Manitouwadge, 2.5 kilometers southwest of Rawluk Lake and 2.5 kilometers north of the north end of Paries Lake.
The claims and trenches are accessible by road following the construction of a branch access road off of a nearby logging road by Mr. Gionet. From manitouwadge, proceed east along the Camp 70 access road for 4.3 km to the Twist Lake road. Proceed south and then easterly along the Twist Lake road for about 10.8 km to a logging road approximately 0.5 km south of Macutagon Creek. Proceed south along this road for approximately 500 meters at which point a blazed claim line indicating the boundary of TB 1141509 can be seen. Proceed along this road another 0.7 km to a place at which a rough access road turns east and terminates at one of the two trenches where copper and nickel bearing sulphides are exposed.
The claims are situated near the center of the Cecil Township claim map (G-2857) as a rectangular group of 3 claims totalling 14 claim units numbered TB 11141506-507 and 1141509 (figure 1) and are registered in the name of Gilles Gionet.
NICKLE TWP G-2853
TOWNSHIP
THUNDER BAY
X SERVICE
- ., . f- - --i ' ,0*0 ' 9740** '
l l
1 X l ' 'X ' *74((*l 974(0 x *740*2 | 9740*^9740*4 , *74O*5 |
8*410?
SCALE 1 INCH . 40 CHAINS
MCGRAW LAKE 0-602
EXPLORATION HISTORY AND OWNERSHIP
Prior to the prospecting and trenching performed my Mr. Gionet there is no record of assessment work filed on the ground covered these claims. The following information is part of a summary written by Doug McKay following his visit to the property in his capacity as the Manitouwadge Resource Geologist with the Ministry of Northern Development and Mines.
1967: The area surrounding the property was examined and mapped by J.F. Giguere (1972, Map 2219) for the Ontario Department of Mines and Northern Affairs. A portion of this map is included as Figure 2.
1987-88: The area immediately east of the property was staked and title transferred to Noranda Minerals Inc. and became part of what Noranda reffered to as their Paries Lake property. Noranda Minerals Inc. (Geco Division) conducted geological mapping, stripping, sampling and diamond drilling (16 holes totalling 4212 m) on its Paries Lake property (assessment files, Thunder Bay Resident Geologist's office, Schreiber-Hemlo District, Thunder Bay). The drilling was conducted in the area located approximately 2.0 to 3.5 km south-southeast of the property. Drill hole S-331 intersected a narrow iron formation which contained up to 0.83 7o Cu and 0>02% Zn over 3.5 feet (assessment files, as noted above). Although anorthositic rocks containing up to 5% sulphides (including chalcopyrite) were intersected during drilling, they were not assayed to determine their nickel content. In 1988, Noranda (Geco Division) conducted reconnaissance-scale geological mapping and lithogeochemical sampling on the Paries Lake property (Schnieders and Smyk 1989).
1991-92: A reconnaissance till sampling survey was conducted in the Manitouwadge area by I.M. Kettles (1993) for the Geological Survey of Canada. Several samples were collected from the area of the property. One of these samples, 91KFA0067, contained anomalous amounts of copper (352 ppm) and nickel (105 ppm) ( Kettles 1993).
1993-94: Prospector Gilles Gionet of Manitouwadge discovered the Cecil Township copper occurence in the spring of 1993 (Resident Geologist's files, Schrieber-Hemlo District, Thunder Bay). This occurence is located on the the western edge of claim TB974660 which is currently held by Noranda Minerals Inc. This discovery led Mr. Gionet to continue prospecting in the area, and during a reconnaissance Beep Mat survey conducted in 1994, he discovered
G E
R T
R U
D E
the Gionet copper-nickel occurrence. This was the first of two showings, apparently part of the same structure, discovered on the Gionet Cu-Ni property. The occurence was stripped, trenched and sampled by Gilles Gionet, Micheal Gionet and Rob Gionet. Grab samples collected at this time were submitted to Mr. Al Guthrie, Senior Exploration Geologist at the Williams Mine (Teck Corporation and Homestake Canada) in Hemlo for analysis and returned assay values up to 9210 ppm Cu, 2825 ppm Ni and 578 ppm Co(Resident Geologist's files, as above). Additional prospecting, stripping and trenching was completed during November to follow-up on the encouraging results obtained during the earlier program.
1995: The occurence was examined and sampled by Mark Smyk and Doug McKay for the Ontario Geological Survey (Resident Geologist's files, as above). A reconnaissance ground magnetometer survey was conducted in the immediate area of the occurences by Micheal Gionet and Doug McKay. The survey results suggest that the mineralized horizon can be traced intermittently along strike for at least 300 m.
GEOLOGY AND MINERALIZATION
Geology The property is located within the Wawa subprovince along the western
margin of the Paries Lake-Moshkinabi Lake mafic intrusive complex (Williams and Breaks 1989, 1990a, 1990b). This complex is located approximately 15 km east-southeast of Manitouwadge at the juncture of the Manitouwadge and Moshkinabi greenstone belts (Zaleski and Peterson 193b). Aeromagnetic data suggests these two belts may be a single continuous belt (D. McKay 1995).
The Faries-Moshkinabi Lake complex consists of a layered suite of gabbro, leucogabbro, anorthosite and peridotite (Williams and Breaks 1989, 1990a, 1990b). Thin screens of amphibolitic, mafic volcanic rocks occur throughout the complex (Williams and Breaks 1989).
Rocks in the area of the showings are variably deformed and altered and exhibit a moderate to locally strongly foliated texture (Williams and Breaks 1990a, 1990b; Nicol 1991). The dominant foliation in the vicinty of these occurences strikes 020 degrees and dips 35-40 degrees to the east. Mineral assemblages indicate the supracrustal rocks have experienced upper amphibolite facies regional metamorphism (Breaks and Williams 1990a).
The Gionet copper-nickel property is hosted by biotite-quartz-amphibole- feldspar gneiss and schist which may represent highly deformed and metamorphosed anorthositic metagabbro of the Faries-Moshkinabi lake complex. Mafic (dioritic) and felsic (quartz-feldspar pegmatite) dikes paralleling and crosscutting foliation are relatively common in the area surrounding the showings.
Mineralization During an examination of the showings by Doug McKay and Mark Smyk
for the Ontario Geolgical Survey (Resident Geologist's files, Schreiber-Hemlo District, Thunder Bay), 2 trenches and 4 pits were examined (figure 3). They compiled the following summary of their observations of the style and character of mineralization exposed in the trenches.
The anorthositic metagabbro hosting the sulphide mineralized zone is typically mottled in shades of light grey, buff and black, is coarse-grained, locally rusty-weathering (along fractures) and moderately to locally strongly foliated (020/3 5-40E). Plagioclase constitutes locally up to 807o of this rock and occurs as sub-rounded (milled looking) phenocrysts/porphyroblasts up to 4mm in diameter and as chalky-weathering, sausseritized clots and lenses varying in size up to W cm long and 2 cm wide. These plagioclase rich clots and lenses impart locally a clastic texture to the rock. Prominent weathering, irregular-shaped aggregations of black, acicular amphibole (hornblende ?) comprise locally up to 20 % of this rock. Medium to coarse-grained pyrite, pyrrhotite and chalcopyrite occur along fractures within the anorthositic metagabbro proximal to the sulphide mineralized zone. These sulphides also occur as isolated interstitial grains within the anorthositic metagabbro, but generally constitute less than l % of this rock.
The sulphide mineralized zone contains locally up to I07o medium to coarse-grained, generally subhedral pyrite, pyrrhotite and chalcopyrite. These sulphides occur as narrow (2-5 cm wide), discontinuous, foliation-parallel seams (usually in association with quartz), as irregularly shaped blebs and patches (up to 30 cm long by 2 cm wide) and as disseminated grains. The sulphides (chalcopyrite in particular) appear to have undergone varying degrees of remobilization along fractures, both within the mineralized horizon itself, and within the surrounding country rock. Although no distinct nickel bearing phases such as pentlandite are visible within the sulphide-mineralized zone, application of dimethylgloxime to pyrrhotite rich grab samples collected by McKay and Smyk from this zone indicated the presence of appreciable amounts of nickel in these rocks. A thin, rusty gossan has developed on the surface of the sulphide - mineralized zone subsequent to its initial exposure in 1994.
Trench F f
dppMg 33 dtgrvti to ttw
Trench E
Trench D u
Mineralized zone
Blotlte-quartz- anphlbole- feldspar gneiss (anortho- sltlc netagabbro)
Figure 3: Gionet Cu-Ni Occurence - Stripping And Trenching Map
Narrow, sulphide bearing iron formations are known to occur in association with anorthosite rocks in the Paries Lake area heated approximately 2.5 km south of the Gionet copper-nickel showings. These iron formation units have been reported to contain sub-economic quantities of copper and zinc (assessment files, Schreiber-Hemlo District, Thunder Bay). It is not known if they contain appreciable amounts of nickel as this element was not assayed for.
WORK PROGRAM COMPLETED
The work program was oriented towards following up on the copper occurence discovered in the spring of 1993 and the anomalous copper values revealed by the reconnaissance till sampling survey conducted by I.M. Kettles (1993) for the Geological Survey of Canada and discovering other showings situated in similar geological environments to the Geco orebody. One of the till samples (91KFA0067) taken in the area of the property returned 352 ppm copper.
Prospecting began in mid-summer and in conduction with the use of a Beep Mat supplied by the Ministry of Northern Development and Mines Office in Thunder Bay. This was followed by the stripping and trenching program described below.
Stripping and Trenching The work program began in June 1994 and continued intermittently until
October 1994 utilizing a 977 Catapillar front end loader on tracks owned by Mr. Gionet to repair access roads to the property, strip overburden and clean the blasted trenches. Mr. Gionet spent 37 days on the property during this time, 10 days operating his loader and the remaining conducting physical labour in excavating, blasting and cleaning the trenches. Two pits and four trenches were excavated and sampled as indicated in figure 3. In October 1994 samples from the trenches were submitted to Mr. Al Guthrie, Senior Exploration Geologist at the Williams Mine (Teck Corporation and Homestake Canada) for analysis. The results of this analysis are yielded values up to 9210 ppm copper, 2825 ppm nickel and 578 ppm cobalt. During their visit to the property M. Smyk and D. McKay described the work which had taken place to date and took samples from the trenches. Following is their description of the area.
These trenches and pits have been excavated along the western margins of two northeasterly-trending (020 degrees), low lying (less than 2m relief) outcrops of biotite-quartz-amphibole-feldspar gneiss (anorthosite gabbro). The northernmost trench (Trench A) is approximately 75m long by 12m wide by 0.75m deep. The southernmost trench (Trench B) is approximately 28m long by 12m wide by 1m deep. Copper, iron and nickel bearing sulphides are exposed in both trenches and in all 4 pits. The sulphides occur primarily within a discrete,
foliation-parallel (020/35E), relatively narrow (up to 80cm wide in Trench B), locally biotite-rich and strongly foliated (often fissile) zone within the anorthosite metagabbro. This zone is locally moderately to stongly magnetic, and is exposed intermittently along strike for approximately 150 meters. The results of a reconnaissance magnetometer survey suggest that this zone may extend an additional 150m to the northeast (Resident Geologist's files, Schreiber- Hemlo District, Thunder Bay).
Follow-up Work An additional two weeks were spent on the property following the staking
of additional claims along the north and west boundaries to surround the original claim staked by Mr. Gionet. Additional work in the early part of November consisted of propspecting with the aid of the Beep Mat and stripping and blasting in any location in which anomalous readings were obtained. In the additional trenched blasted no significant amounts of sulphide mineralization were noted.
CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS
The exploration program was successful in delineating a zone of anomalous copper and nickel mineralization hosted within an anorthositic gabbro which has been trenched intermittently over a distance of 150m and is geophysically inferred to extend at least an additional 150m. Anomalous cobalt values were also returned from the sampling. The grades suggest the area should be systematically explored for additional mineralization of this type along strike and elsewhere in the area.
More prospecting should also be conducted in an effort to identify similar mineralization in the area. Additional geophysical surveys are warranted to assist in tracing potential mineralized horizons as well as a detailed Beep Mat survey which has proved useful in locating the sulphide mineralized zone. Further work should be concentrated to theastr as this is where the mineralized horizon dips and the downdip extension appears to host the best potential for increasing mineralization.
Manitouwadge, Ontario Robert J. Reukl, B.Se. October 10, 1996 Geologist
CERTIFICATION
I, Robert J. Reukl, of 21 Falcon Avenue, Manitouwadge, Ontario do certify as follows concerning my Trenching Update on the Gionet Cu-Ni Property, Cecil Township, Thunder Bay Mining Division, Ontario.
1. I am a member in good standing of the following organizations: (a) The Canadian Institute of Mining, Metallurgy and Petroleum, (b) The Prospector's and Developer's Association,
2. I am a graduate of Lakehead University in Thunder Bay, Ontario holding a Bachelor of Science degree received in 1984,
3. I have no beneficial interest, nor do I expect to receive any interest, in the property described in this report,
4. The attached report is a product of: (a) Data obtained by Gilles Gionet in the fall of 1994, (b) Sources referred to in the body of the report.
October 10, 1996 Robert J. Reukl, B.Sc. Manitouwadge, Ontario Geologist
APPENDIX I
Doug McKay, Ministry of Northern Development and Mines Thunder Bay
and Mines Submitted By? Date:
SAMPLE f .LOCATION FOR SAMPLE KAME SAMPLE DESCRIPTION
l J.
i r
H rfr. u- .
A//-. l
l J,
, l* li
55*5
Northern Development and Mines
Submit t cd By:
T Co.- /Jc j CM, f h, ^t - fap-
ii
Proapectorc Package by Mf final taport
apart Date O. tef
095-0073-06 095-0073-09 095-0073-10 095-0073-11 095-0073-12 095-0073-13 095-0073-14
95866-01 95866-02 95866-03 95866-M 958C6-OS 95866-06 95866-07
65 . 78 70 82 103 236 57
584 440
U03 4100
4100
4100
4100
4100
4100
4100
4100
440
470 470 470 470 470 470 470
440 440 440 440 440 440 440
450 450 450 450 450 450 450
2.
3.
: - -Mot Measured
: to * Greater than ifper Liarit of Quantification
Analyst PtO : JLN
1 of 2
DflS 4)073 095-0073 096-0073 O96-0073 095-0073 D96-O073
OC OC QC OC OC QC QC QC QC
96-BGG-01 95-B6G-03 9S-8C6-O4 9S-BGG-05 9S-8GG-O7
9S-BGG-07D MRB-29
BEN-1 ESI-8
ESt-11 R.BLK
1OO8 421.0 413.9 247.4 248.6 SO.79 49.44 49.81 50.21 84.90 84.47 513.8
<5
PGE Elements by FA/ICP-OES Final Report
ient : McKay sojeot Number :
Lab ID Sample ID Rep f Au Pt Pd Comments
D95-0073-08 D95-0073-10 D95-0073-11 D95-0073-12 D95-0073-14 D95-0073-27
9 5 EGG- 01 95BGG-03 95BGG-04 95BGG-05 95BGG-07 95BBB-03
1 1 1 1 1 1
O O o 7 O 0
*:10 *ao CIO <10 <10 -ao
8 16 12 <5 ^ <5
Comment* pertaining to your samples :
2C Notes t All values in ppb : - - Not Measured : *:n - Less than Limit of Detection : >n - Greater than upper Limit of Quantification : A sample weight of l assay ton (29.166 g) is used on all samples. : Nugget effect can account for variation in Au and Ag contents.
***** END OF REPORT *****
APPROVED: Dr. Jean Richardson, C. Chem. Q.C. Supervisor, Geoscience Labs
wiaiyst Approval P2.2 QC Approval rocedure f
l PCP : MLM : MS-14, ICP-OES Finish
Page l of l
Trace 1 Elements by AA Final Report
Client : HdCay Project fcjaber :
Report Date St Ref
Jul 27 1995 095-0073
10 Saaple ID Rode Type Co Cu Li •i fb CoMents
095-0073-08 95*06-01 •95-0073-10 95*66-03 095-0073-11 95*06-04 095-0073-12 95866-05 095-0073- U 95BGG-07
Schist Schist Schist flnefss Gneiu
3 7 4 4 7
.
.
.
. ,
**** EH) Of REPORT *****
O.C. Supervisor, Geoscience Labs
Special Motes : All values in ppai : - - Not Measured : *n- s Less than Unit of detection : ^ - Greater than upper liaft of quantification
Analyst Til Approval : GJH Analyst 112 Approval : Analyst T1H Approval : Analyst TIT Approval :
Pag* 1 of 1
T11 QC Approval : 112 QC Approval : T18 K Approval : T1T QC Approval : Procedure f :
MLM
Williams Mine, Hemlo, Ontario
ir r-
TO: Ms*rs. Gilles 6\ Reginald Gionet: ~ P.O. Box 277. ManKouwadgo, Ontario, POT 200 _____
FROM: A. Guthrie: ~ WBIIams Op stating Corporation, WHUams Mlno P. O. Bag BOO, Marathon, Ont,, POT 2EO
TEL. (807) 2M- 11 00 FAX (M7)2M- 10*0
DATE: FobruarylB. 1BM
RELO IDENTIFICATION * W. O. C. AWAY TAO*
METHOD FIRE ASSAY
ppm gm/l
Zn ppm ppm
Pb ppm MO ppm Fe (*)
ppm Ni ppm Ba ppm Cd ppm CO ppm At ppm Sb ppm Cr ppm
PAOE 1 of 1
N-E of MANPTOUWAOOe ivo. aionot IR./Q. oionst IR./Q. oionot R./Q. Oionot R./Q. Oionot
Showing * 1 Baa:(Part 1)
0.09
0.0*
0.026
0.04
0.025
0.0*
0.02
0.0*
Bvi:(Port1) M7M
0.040
0.0*
Sampls M*00 contains slgnMoant araphlUo Carbon. Intsrtrrsfics with goM sxtraotion for tri* Atomio Absorption analysis would glvs Inaoourato rosulla.
NOTE: I.O.P. oml-Quantltattv* I.C.P. MuM-olomont Soan: (soo attaohod ri A. A. Alomlo Absorption l AoW dlgostlon. total samplo. Fe Total soluble Iron (mainly from aulphldos) In poroont
-N/A- Not Analyzed N.O. Non* Dotootad; Bolow dotootion llmtt of msthod usod. < * Los* than *.
lata).
Daily Log - Stripping & Trenching Program
Program Dates: Property: Supervisor: Helper:
October 28th to November 11 th Gionet Cu-Ni Proprty, Cecil Twp. Gilles Gionet Robert Vaudrin
Daily Log
November 6th: November 7th: November 8th:
November 9th: November 10th: November lith:
Total:
Gilles Gionet prospecting with Beep Mat. Gilles Gionet prospecting with Beep Mat. Gilles Gionet and Robert Vaudrin stripping targets. Gilles Gionet prospecting with Beep Mat and Robert Vaudrin stripping targets. Gilles Gionet drilling with gas plugger. Gilles Gionet drilling with gas plugger. Gilles Gionet drilling with gas plugger. Gilles Gionet and Robert Vaudrin loading and blasting drilled targets. Gilles Gionet and Robert Vaudrin cleaning trenches. Gilles Gionet and Robert Vaudrin cleaning trenches. Gilles Gionet and Robert Vaudrin loading and blasting drilled targets. Gilles Gionet and Robert Vaudrin cleaning trenches. Gilles Gionet and Robert Vaudrin cleaning trenches. Gilles Gionet packing up gear.
Gilles Gionet - 15 days, Robert Vaudrin - 8 days
Additional Equipment
Dynamite: Chainsaw: Truck:
12 days @ SlOO./day (including gas, drill bits) 12 days @ SlOO./day (including trailer, gas, oil) Caterpillar 977 front end loader on tracks, 2 days @ 6 hours/day ( S95.7hr.) Dynamite, caps, leadwire - S100. l day @ SSO./day 1/2 ton pickup, 22 trips @ 48 km/trip (S.307km)
Ministry of Northern Development and Mines
Ontario
Mining Act
Transaction Number
Personal information collected on this form is obtained under the authority of the Mining Act. This information will be used for correspondence. Questions about this collection should be directed to the Provincial Manager, Mining Lands, Ministry of Northern Development and Mines, Fourth Floor, 159 Cedar Street, Sudbury, Ontario, P3E 6A5, telephone (705) 670-7264.
Instructions: - Please type or print and su - Refer to the Mining Act am
Recorder. - A separate copy of this fori - Technical reports and
isult the Mining
42F04SE0005 W9640.00562 CECIL
- A sketch, showing the claims the work is assigned to, must accompany tms 900
Recorded Holder(s) Client No.
Oates formed ^^> , To:
Geotechnical Survey
Pe.oep&^TiMG, ^T^.\iPPito6 ^ Tiseio^i-MN-^
Total Assessment Work Claimed on the Attached Statement of Costs S
Note: The Minister may reject for assessment work credit all or part of the assessment work submitted if the recorded holder cannot verify expenditures claimed in the statement of costs within 30 days of a request for verification.
Persons and Survey Company Who Performed the Work (Give Name and Address of Author of Report) Name Address
IT ,Or^T.
(attach a schedule if necessary)
Certification of Beneficial Interest * See Note No. 1 on reverse side
\ certify that at the time the work was performed, the claims covered in this work report were recorded in the current holder's name or held under a beneficial interest by the current recorded holder.
Date Recorded Holder or Agent (Signature)
. Zl/'U
Certification of Work Report l certify that l have a personal knowledge of the facts set forth in this Work report, having performed the work or witnessed same during and/or after its completion and annexed report is true.
Name and Address of Person Certifying
C2.0&IESZ-T Z\ P?TT O f
OUl W Telepone No. Date Certified By-(Signature)
For Office Use Only Total Value Cr. Recorded
^
Mining Recorder '
Jgc&yfte /7, /9fa Date Notice for Amendments Sent
Received Stamp Trrtmder'Bsy
M-mW^fl^i'sfott
H s.
o 5-
(Vs
-4
b
O .^
^Zfi^ 3" X 0) P) w'*"*) c O D 1 ffl wio-a 3 * S
i'tp
i|s| B" S of" a
Credits you are claiming in this report may be cut back. In order to minimize the adverse effects of such deletions, please indicate from which claims you wish to priorize the deletion of credits. Please mark (.x) one of the following:
1. D Credits are to be cut back starting with the claim listed last, working backwards. 2. Bcredits are to be cut back equally over all claims contained in this report of work. 3. D Credits are to be cut back as priorized on the attached appendix.
In the event that you have not specified your choice of priority, option one will be implemented.
Note 1: Examples of beneficial interest are unrecorded transfers, option agreements, memorandum of agreements, etc., with respect to the mining claims.
Note 2: If work has been performed on patented or leased land, please complete the following:
l certify that the recorded holder had a beneficial interest in the patented or leased land at the time the work was performed.
Signature Date
Ministere du Developpement du Nord et des mines
Statement of Costs for Assessment Credit
Etat des couts aux fins du credit devaluation
Mining Act/Loi sur les mines
Transaction No./N 0 de transaction
Personal information collected on this form is obtained under the authority of the Mining Act. This information will be used to maintain a record and ongoing status of the mining claim(s). Questions about this collection should be directed to the Provincial Manager, Minings Lands, Ministry of Northern Development and Mines, 4th Floor, 159 Cedar Street, Sudbury, Ontario P3E 6A5, telephone (705) 670-7264.
Les renseignements personnels contenus dans la pr6sente formule sont recueillis en vertu de la Loi sur les mines et serviront a tenir a jour un registre des concessions minieres. Adresser toute quesiton sur la collece de ces renseignements au chef provincial des terrains miniers, ministere du Developpement du Nord et des Mines, 159, rue Cedar, 4e Stage, Sudbury (Ontario) P3E 6A5, telephone (705) 670-7264.
1. Direct Costs/Couts directs
Contractor's and Consultant's Fees Oroits de ('entrepreneur et de I'expert- conseil
Supplies Used Fournitures utilisees
Description
Type
6z^ Put-A^&ec.
T&gjZA. JET C C*T e E. f i UUA. (i.
TE.A.C.TCPP-
2. Indirect Costs/Couts indirects * * Note: When claiming Rehabilitation work Indirect costs are not
allowable as assessment work. Pour le remboursement des travaux de rehabilitation, les couts indirects ne sont pas admissibles en tant que travaux devaluation.
Type
Description
Amount Montant
Sub Total of Indirect Costs Total partiel des couts indirects
Amount Allowable (not greater than 20Vo of Direct Costs) Montant admissible (n'excedant pas 20 Vo des couts directs) Total Value of Assessment Credit Valeur totale du credit (Total of Direct and Allowable d'evaluation indirect costs) (Total des couts directs
Totals Total global
sn (o, 157
et Indirects admissibles
Note: The recorded holder will be required to verify expenditures claimed in this statement of costs within 30 days of a request for verification. If verification is not made, the Minister may reject for assessment work all or part of the assessment work submitted.
Note : Le titulaire enregistre sera tenu de verifier les depenses demandees dans le present etat des couts dans les 30 jours suivant une demande a cet effet. Si la verification n'est pas effectude, le ministre peut rejeter tout ou une partie des travaux devaluation presented.
Filing Discounts
1. Work filed within two years of completion is claimed at 100 07o of the above Total Value of Assessment Credit.
Remises pour depot
1. Les travaux deposes dans les deux ans suivant leur achievement sont rembourses a 100 Vo de la valeur totale susmentionnee du credit d'evaluation.
2. Work filed three, four or five years after completion is claimed at 5007o of the above Total Value of Assessment Credit. See calculations below:
Total Value of Assessment Credit Total Assessment Claimed
x 0.50 =
Certification Verifying Statement of Costs
l hereby certify: that the amounts shown are as accurate as possible and these costs were incurred while conducting assessment work on the lands shown on the accompanying Report of Work form.
that as HouPEG, (Recorded Holder, Agent, Position in Company)
to make this certification
2. Les travaux deposes trois, quatre ou cinq ans apres leur achievement sont rembourses a 50 "/o de la valeur totale du credit devaluation susmentionne. Voir les calculs ci-dessous.
Valeur totale du credit d'evaluation Evaluation totale demandee
RTihi!ip"l5ivisic
OCT 2 3 1996 Attestation de l'etat des couts
RJ&CJtiiVED J'atteste par la presente : que les montants indiques sont le plus exact possible et que ces depenses ont ete engagees pour effectuer les travaux d'evaluation sur les terrains indiques dans la formule de rapport de travail ci-joint.
| am authorized Et qu'a litre de . je suis autorise (titulaire enregistre, repr6sentant, poste occupe dans la compagnie)
a faire cette attestation.
0212 (04/91) Nota : Dans cette formule, lorsqu'il designe des personnes, le masculin est utilise au sens neutre
O O
—l 6
i s z z CD o CO c 33 > o
o z
m O )
G ER
TR UD
E TW
O
m H
C/ ) n z o x s n i z CO
in w
O
x 33 o 3)
33
CD
C
Z o z TJ m Z > o o o z CD
33
CD
Z
m
O
33
O
> D
c/ )
O m
c i