Initiating antiretrovirals during tuberculosis treatment ...
Treatment of Tuberculosis, 2017 - National Jewish …...Treatment of Tuberculosis, 2017 Charles L....
Transcript of Treatment of Tuberculosis, 2017 - National Jewish …...Treatment of Tuberculosis, 2017 Charles L....
Treatment of Tuberculosis, 2017
Charles L. Daley, MDNational Jewish Health
University of Colorado Health Sciences CenterProp
erty o
f Pres
enter
Not for
Rep
roduc
tion
Treatment of TuberculosisDisclosures
• Advisory Board – Horizon, Johnson and Johnson, Otsuka and Spero
• Investigator – Insmed
Propert
y of P
resen
ter
Not for
Rep
roduc
tion
Objectives
After participating in this lecture, you should be able to:1. Describe the objectives of anti‐tuberculosis therapy2. Describe the recommended treatment regimens for drug susceptible pulmonary TB3. Describe the recommended approach to treatment monitoring
Propert
y of P
resen
ter
Not for
Rep
roduc
tion
Outline
• Approach to treatment decisions in patients with suspected TB?
• Objectives of Anti‐tuberculosis Therapy• Organization and Supervision of Therapy• Recommended Treatment Regimens
– Treatment of Paucibacillary Disease
• Monitoring for Treatment Response and Adverse Drug Reactions
• Can we shorten the duration of therapy?Prop
erty o
f Pres
enter
Not for
Rep
roduc
tion
Asian‐Born Student in her 20’s,
PPD+ at college clinic• Asymptomatic• Erythromycin for mild pneumonia 6 mo. ago in Asia
• Chest X‐ray: nodular infiltrate
Propert
y of P
resen
ter
Not for
Rep
roduc
tion
Audience Response Question
Which of the following would be the most appropriate next step?A. Collect sputum for culture and wait for resultsB. Collect sputum for culture and start 4‐drug regimenC. Begin isoniazid and rifampin preventive therapyD. Begin treatment for community acquired pneumoniaE. Do nothing, her TST result is likely a false positiveProp
erty o
f Pres
enter
Not for
Rep
roduc
tion
Factors Affecting Decision to Initiate Treatment
Patient
Laboratory/Radiologic
Clinical status/suspicious
Favors Treatment Initiation Favors Delayed or no Treatment
Public Health
Risk for progressionYoung age (< 2 yo)TB exposure
Risk for AENo TB exposure
Radiograph cw TBSmear positive, NAAT positiveSmear negative, NAAT positive
Radiograph not cw TBSmear positive, NAAT negativeSmear negative, NAAT negative
Life threatening diseaseSymptoms cw TBAlternative diagnosis unlikely
Stable diseaseSymptoms not cw TBAlternative diagnosis likely
High transmission riskConcern for lost to f/u Low transmission risk
Propert
y of P
resen
ter
Not for
Rep
roduc
tion
Objectives Of Anti-tuberculosis Therapy
Never treat active TB with a single drug
Rapid killing of multiplying bacilli (bactericidal effect)
Achievement of relapse-free cure (sterilizing effect)
Protection against acquisition of drug resistance
INH
RIF, PZA
INH, RIF, EMBPropert
y of P
resen
ter
Not for
Rep
roduc
tion
Organization and Supervision of Therapy (2)
1. Do case management interventions improve outcomes compared to curative therapy alone among patients with TB?
We suggest using case management interventions(conditional recommendation, low quality of evidence)
Studies Patient Educationand Counseling
Standard Approach
Relative Risk
Adherence 1 53.6% 29.3% 1.83 (1.14‐2.92)Treatment Completion
1 72.9% 42.0% 1.71 (1.32‐2.22)Prop
erty o
f Pres
enter
Not for
Rep
roduc
tion
Organization and Supervision of Therapy (2)
We suggest using DOT rather than SAT (conditional recommendation, low quality of evidence)
2. Does self‐administered therapy (SAT) have similar outcomes compared to directly observed therapy (DOT) in patients with various forms of TB?
Studies DOT SAT Relative RiskTreatment Success 1 74.6% 73.0% 0.94 (0.89‐0.98)Culture conversion 1 88.4% 81.8% 0.92 (0.87‐0.98)
No difference in mortality, treatment completion or relapseProp
erty o
f Pres
enter
Not for
Rep
roduc
tion
Organization and Supervision of Therapy (2)
We suggest using DOT rather than SAT (conditional recommendation, low quality of evidence)
2. Does self‐administered therapy (SAT) have similar outcomes compared to directly observed therapy (DOT) in patients with various forms of TB?
Studies DOT SAT Relative Risk
Treatment Success 1 74.6% 73.0% 0.94 (0.89‐0.98)
Culture conversion 1 88.4% 81.8% 0.92 (0.87‐0.98)
No difference in mortality, treatment completion or relapsePopulation-based studies:
reduction in acquisition and transmission of drug-resistant TB (Texas), increased treatment success in HIV infected patients (NYC)reduction in mortality and lost to follow-up (Brazil)
Propert
y of P
resen
ter
Not for
Rep
roduc
tion
Priority Situations for the Use of Directly Observed Therapy
• Positive sputum smear • Treatment failure/relapse• Drug resistance• HIV infection• Previous treatment• Intermittent dosing
• Current or prior substance abuse
• Previous nonadherence • Children/adolescents• Mental/emotional/
physical disability• Resident at correctional
or long-term care facility• HomelessnessProp
erty o
f Pres
enter
Not for
Rep
roduc
tion
Treatment of TuberculosisStandard Regimen
Isoniazid
Rifampin
Pyrazinamide
Ethambutol
0 1 2 3 4 5 6months
Initial Phase Continuation Phase
Propert
y of P
resen
ter
Not for
Rep
roduc
tion
Duration of Treatment
Regimen Duration, mos
Treatment Success
SM, PAS 18‐24 75%INH, SM, PAS 18‐24 95%INH, SM (or EMB), PZA 9 95%2 INH, RIF, SM/ 7 INH, RIF 9 95%2 INH, RIF, EMB/ 7 INH, RIF 9 95%2 INH, RIF, EMB, PZA/ 4 INH, RIF 6 95%
Propert
y of P
resen
ter
Not for
Rep
roduc
tion
Recommended Treatment RegimensDaily vs. Intermittent Dosing?
3. Does intermittent dosing in the intensive phase have similar outcomes compared to daily dosing in the intensive phase for treatment of drug‐susceptible pulmonary TB?
Daily rather than intermittent dosing (strong recommendation, moderate quality of evidence)
Three times weekly therapy may be considered in patients who are not HIV-infected and at low risk for relapse (non-cavitary and/or smear negative (conditional recommendation, low quality of evidence)
Twice weekly therapy after an initial two weeks of daily therapy may be considered for patients who are not HIV-infected and are also at low risk risk of relapse (conditional recommendation/very low quality of evidence)
Propert
y of P
resen
ter
Not for
Rep
roduc
tion
Recommended Treatment RegimensDaily vs. Intermittent Dosing?
4. Does intermittent dosing in the continuation phase have similar outcomes compared to daily dosing in the intensive phase for treatment of drug‐susceptible pulmonary TB?
Daily or three times weekly continuation phase (strong recommendation, moderate quality of evidence)
Three times weekly instead of twice weekly therapy if intermittent therapy is used(conditional recommendation, low quality of evidence)
Recommend against use of once weekly therapy with rifapentine600 mg (strong recommendation, high quality of evidence)
Propert
y of P
resen
ter
Not for
Rep
roduc
tion
Relapse Rates By Cavitation and 2‐Month Culture Status
6‐month regimen Cav+C2m+
Cav+C2m‐
Cav‐C2m+
Cav‐C2m‐
Daily 6.0 2.2 1.8 0.6Daily IP + thrice weekly CP 6.1 3.3 2.2 1.2Daily IP + twice weekly CP 15.6 5.7 5.4 1.9Thrice weekly 14.5 5.3 4.6 1.7Daily IP with Rp in CP 25.3 9.0 8.4 3.0Thrice weekly IP with Rp in CP 36.1 12.9 12.0 4.3
IP – intensive phase, CP continuation phase, Rp – rifapentineCav – cavitary, C2m – 2 month culture status
Chang et al, AJRCCM 2006; 174;1153‐1158
Propert
y of P
resen
ter
Not for
Rep
roduc
tion
Initial ContinuationReg Drugs Interval/Dose Drugs Interval/Dose
1 INHRIFEMBPZA
7 days/wk (56) or 5 days/wk (40)
INH/RIF 7 days/wk (126) or 5 days/wk (90)
2 INHRIFEMBPZA
7 days/wk (56) or 5 days/wk (40)
INH/RIF 3 days/wk (54)
ATS/CDC/IDSA. AJRCCM 2016 167:735
Preferred Regimens for Newly Diagnosed Pulmonary TB
Effectiveness
Propert
y of P
resen
ter
Not for
Rep
roduc
tion
Alternative Regimens
Initial ContinuationReg Drugs Interval/Dose Drugs Interval/Dose3* INH
RIFEMBPZA
3X wkly (24) INH/RIF 3X wkly (54)
4** INHRIFEMBPZA
7 days/wk (14) then twice wkly (12)
INH/RIF 2X wkly (36)
ATS/CDC/IDSA. AJRCCM 2016 167:735
Effectiveness
*Use with caution in patients with HIV or cavitary disease**Do not use in patients with HIV or smear positive and/or cavitary disease
Propert
y of P
resen
ter
Not for
Rep
roduc
tion
Treatment of TuberculosisCompletion of Therapy
• Completion of therapy is defined as the number of doses taken
• Initial phase - All of the specified doses should be delivered within 3 months
• Continuation phase - All of the specified doses should be administered within 6 months
• Thus, a 6-month regimen should be completed within 9 months
ATS/CDC/IDSA AJRCCM 2016 Prop
erty o
f Pres
enter
Not for
Rep
roduc
tion
Interruptions in Treatment
Time point of interruption
Details of interruption Approach
Intensive Phase Lapse is < 14 days Continue treatment
Lapse is ≥ 14 days Restart treatment
Continuation Phase Received ≥ 80% of doses and was sm (‐) at diagnosis
Further treatment may not be necessary
Received ≥ 80% of doses and was sm (+) at diagnosis
Continue treatment unless 2 consecutive mos missed then restart
Received < 80% of doses and lapse < 3 mos
Continue treatment
Received < 80% of doses and lapse ≥ 3 mos
Restart treatment
Propert
y of P
resen
ter
Not for
Rep
roduc
tion
Treatment of TuberculosisExtending Therapy in High Risk
Isoniazid
Rifampin
Pyrazinamide
Ethambutol
0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9months
Initial Continuation Phase*
*Extend continuation phase from 4 to 7 months if:1) cavitary disease and 2) culture positive at 2 mos
Propert
y of P
resen
ter
Not for
Rep
roduc
tion
Relapse Rates By Cavitation and 2‐Month Culture Status
6‐month regimen Cav+C2m+
Cav+C2m‐
Cav‐C2m+
Cav‐C2m‐
Daily 6.0 2.2 1.8 0.6Daily IP + thrice weekly CP 6.1 3.3 2.2 1.2Daily IP + twice weekly CP 15.6 5.7 5.4 1.9Thrice weekly 14.5 5.3 4.6 1.7Daily IP with Rp in CP 25.3 9.0 8.4 3.0Thrice weekly IP with Rp in CP 36.1 12.9 12.0 4.3
IP – intensive phase, CP continuation phase, Rp – rifapentineCav – cavitary, C2m – 2 month culture status
Chang et al, AJRCCM 2006; 174;1153‐1158
Propert
y of P
resen
ter
Not for
Rep
roduc
tion
Extending the Duration of Therapy
• Either cavitation or positive sputum culture at 2 months of therapy plus:– >10 % below ideal body weight– Smoker– Diabetes mellitus– HIV infection– Other immunosuppressive conditions– Extensive disease on chest radiograph
Propert
y of P
resen
ter
Not for
Rep
roduc
tion
Case 1• 29 year old HIV negative
Chinese man with chronic cough, night sweats, and weight loss
• Sputum is AFB smear and culture positive
• After two months of treatment his smears are positive
• Culture results after two months of therapy return as negative
Propert
y of P
resen
ter
Not for
Rep
roduc
tion
Audience Response Question
• This patient should be treated for 9 months.
A. TrueB. False
Propert
y of P
resen
ter
Not for
Rep
roduc
tion
2 month culture
positive?
Algorithm to Guide Duration of Continuation-Phase Treatment
Cavitypresent?
HIV-infected
?
Yes Yes
Yes
Give continuation-phase treatment
for 7 monthsNo
Give continuation-phase treatment
for 4 months
No
No
On anti-TB Rx
CDCProp
erty o
f Pres
enter
Not for
Rep
roduc
tion
Treatment in Special SituationsPaucibacillary Disease (Sm‐, Cx‐)
9. Does a shorter duration of treatment have similar outcomes compared to a standard 6‐month treatment duration among HIV‐negative patients with paucibacillary TB?
Suggest a 4-month treatment regimen for treatment of HIV-negative adult patients with AFB smear- and culture-negative pulmonary TB(Conditional recommendation / Very low quality of evidence)
Study N Regimen RelapseHong Kong 325 INH‐RIF‐PZA‐SM X 4 mos 4.0%Arkansas 414 INH‐RIF X 4 mos 1.2%Singapore 196 2INH‐RIF‐PZA / 2INH‐RIF
2INH‐RIF‐PZA / 2INH3‐RIF3<1.0%
Propert
y of P
resen
ter
Not for
Rep
roduc
tion
Initial culture
negative?
Four-Month Regimen for Paucibacillary Disease
Clinical or x-ray
improved
YesYes
Give continuation-phase treatment for
2 months
No
On anti-TB Rx
Stop treatment
2 mos 4 mos
Propert
y of P
resen
ter
Not for
Rep
roduc
tion
Nahid P, et al. Clin Infect Dis. 2016;63(7):e147-e195.
Monitoring for Treatment Response and Adverse Reactions
Shaded - optionalProp
erty o
f Pres
enter
Not for
Rep
roduc
tion
Management of Treatment Failure
• 90-95% of patients treated for pulmonary TB with regimens containing INH and RIF will have negative sputum cultures by 3 mos
• Treatment failure is defined as continuously or recurrently positive cultures after 4 mos
• If still culture positive after 3 months of therapy:– Recheck drug susceptibility tests– Assess adherence– Consider malabsorption of drugs
Propert
y of P
resen
ter
Not for
Rep
roduc
tion
Management of Treatment Failure
• Treatment failure - Culture positive after 4 months of therapy:– If the patient is seriously ill or sputum AFB
smear +, an empirical regimen should be started with at least 2-3 new drugs
– If the patient is not seriously ill consider waiting for the results of drug susceptibility testing
Propert
y of P
resen
ter
Not for
Rep
roduc
tion
Randomized Trials of Short Course Flouroquinolone Regimens
Study Location N RegimensUnfavorable Outcomes
P (in miTTanalysis)
ReMOX 9 countries in Africa, Asia, Central Am.
1931 2 HRZE/4HR2 HRZM/2HRM2 MRZE/2MR
16%23%24%
‐‐‐NSNS
South Indian Trial
2 sites in India 429 2 HRZE/4HR2 HRZM/2HRM2 HRZG/2HRG
9%11%20%
‐‐‐.38.02
OFLOTUB 5 countries in Africa
1836 2 HRZE/4HR2 HRZG/2HRG
17%21%
‐‐‐NS
RIFAQUIN 4 countries in Africa
827 2 HRZE/4HR2 RZEM/4M1Rp12 RZEM/2M2Rp2
14%14%27%
‐‐‐NSS
Gillespie SH, et al. NEJM 2014;371:1577 Jindani A et al. NEJM 2014;371:1599Merle CS, et al NEJM 2014;371:1588 Jawahar MS, et al. PLoS One 2013;8
Lanoix JP, et al. Clin Infect Dis 2015
Propert
y of P
resen
ter
Not for
Rep
roduc
tion
Summary
• Treatment and its completion is the single most important factor in controlling TB in a population
• Treatment involves initiation of 4‐drugs in the initial phase followed by two drugs during the continuation phase
• Duration of therapy is 6 months– Treatment should be extended to 9 months when cavitation is present
on the x‐ray AND the culture is still positive after 2 month of therapy.
• Duration of therapy can be 4 months for smear and culture negative pulmonary TB
• Patients should be monitored for response to therapy (culture conversion) and for evidence of adverse drug reactions
Propert
y of P
resen
ter
Not for
Rep
roduc
tion