Transparency Report 2016 - EY - US › ... › EY-gennemsigtighedsrapport-2016.pdf ·...

28
Transparency Report 2016 EY Denmark CVR no. 30 70 02 28

Transcript of Transparency Report 2016 - EY - US › ... › EY-gennemsigtighedsrapport-2016.pdf ·...

Page 1: Transparency Report 2016 - EY - US › ... › EY-gennemsigtighedsrapport-2016.pdf · 2019-09-17 · Transparency Report 201 6 — EY Denmark 3 Message from the Country Managing Partner

TransparencyReport 2016EY Denmark

CVR no. 30 70 02 28

Page 2: Transparency Report 2016 - EY - US › ... › EY-gennemsigtighedsrapport-2016.pdf · 2019-09-17 · Transparency Report 201 6 — EY Denmark 3 Message from the Country Managing Partner

Transparency Report 2016 — EY Denmark 2

ContentsMessage from the Country Managing Partner and the EY Denmark Assurance Leader................................................... 3

About us ................................................................................................................................................................ 5

Legal structure, ownership and governance ............................................................................................................ 5

Network arrangements......................................................................................................................................... 6

Commitment to quality ............................................................................................................................................ 9

Infrastructure supporting quality ........................................................................................................................... 9

Instilling professional values ............................................................................................................................... 10

Internal quality control system ............................................................................................................................ 11

Client acceptance and continuance ...................................................................................................................... 12

Performing audits .............................................................................................................................................. 13

Review and consultation ..................................................................................................................................... 14

Audit partner rotation ........................................................................................................................................ 15

Audit quality reviews.......................................................................................................................................... 15

External quality assurance review ........................................................................................................................ 16

Compliance with legal requirements ..................................................................................................................... 17

Independence practices ......................................................................................................................................... 18

Continuing education of audit professionals ............................................................................................................ 20

Revenue and remuneration .................................................................................................................................... 22

Financial information ......................................................................................................................................... 22

Partner remuneration ........................................................................................................................................ 23

Declaration on Quality control system independence policy……………………………………………………………………………………………… 24

Appendix .............................................................................................................................................................. 25

EY Denmark public interest entity audit clients........................................................................................................ 25

More information about EY can be found at ey.com.

Page 3: Transparency Report 2016 - EY - US › ... › EY-gennemsigtighedsrapport-2016.pdf · 2019-09-17 · Transparency Report 201 6 — EY Denmark 3 Message from the Country Managing Partner

Transparency Report 2016 — EY Denmark 3

Message from the Country Managing Partner and theEY Denmark Assurance Leader

Welcome to the 2016 Transparency Report of EY Denmark (CVR no. 30 70 02 28).

This report is one of the ways in which we share with our stakeholders how we advance audit quality, manage risk and maintain ourindependence as auditors. Regular dialogue is important to us, and we welcome the opportunity to engage with our stakeholders.

The 2016 EY Denmark Transparency Report complies with the Danish Auditors Act, which is based on EU 8 th Directive and coversthe fiscal year ending 30 June 2016. In this report, you can learn more about our internal quality control system: how we instillprofessional values, how we perform an audit, our review and consultation processes, our approach to audit quality reviews andour independence practices.

Executing high-quality audits is at the heart of our ability to serve the public interest and grow our firm successfully andresponsibly, while achieving our purpose of building a better working world.

Auditors play a vital role in the functioning of capital markets by promoting transparency and supporting investor confidence.Companies, regulators and other stakeholders count on us to deliver excellence in every engagement.

EY is focused on investing in tools, processes and technologies to improve what we do, creating the highest-performing teams andbuilding trust and confidence in the audits we perform. EY Denmark’s reputation is based on and grounded in providing high-quality, professional audit services objectively and ethically to every company we audit.

Welcome to the EU Audit reform

On the 17th of June 2016 the EU Audit reform was implemented in Denmark. With the EU Audit reform, audit firm rotation forPublic Interest Entities (PIEs) (a maximum of 20 years, provided a tender after 10 years) becomes mandatory, and some non-audit services will be prohibited. Though there is still a wide range of services that audit firms are allowed to provide to theirclients. it will become common that we either provide audit services or provide other services to PIEs– as a result of bothregulation and governance. Denmark implemented a country PIE definition in line with the EU minimum definition.

Audit Quality

EY Denmark is focused on enhancing audit quality and maintaining our independence, informed by several matters includingexternal and internal inspection findings. Continuously improving audit quality requires us to challenge approaches to auditexecution, and we focus on this by evaluating all inspection findings and taking responsive actions.

We encourage all our stakeholders — (including clients, investors and regulators) — to continue to engage with us on the matterscovered in this report.

Jesper Koefoed Anders Stig LauritsenCEO, Country Managing Partner Assurance, Big Cities

Page 4: Transparency Report 2016 - EY - US › ... › EY-gennemsigtighedsrapport-2016.pdf · 2019-09-17 · Transparency Report 201 6 — EY Denmark 3 Message from the Country Managing Partner

Transparency Report 2016 — EY Denmark 4

Our purpose: building a better working worldEY is committed to doing its part in building a better working world.

The insights and quality services we deliver help build trust and confidence in the capital markets and in economies the worldover. We develop outstanding leaders who team to deliver on our promises to stakeholders. In so doing, we play a critical role inbuilding a better working world for our people, our clients and our communities.

Page 5: Transparency Report 2016 - EY - US › ... › EY-gennemsigtighedsrapport-2016.pdf · 2019-09-17 · Transparency Report 201 6 — EY Denmark 3 Message from the Country Managing Partner

Transparency Report 2016 — EY Denmark 5

About usLegal structure, ownership andgovernanceIn Denmark, Ernst & Young GodkendtRevisionspartnerselskab, EY Grønland GodkendtRevisionsanpartsselskab and EY Net Source A/S are memberfirms of Ernst & Young Global Limited, a UK company limitedby guarantee (EYG). In this report, we refer to ourselves asEY Denmark, “we,” “us” or “our.” EY refers collectively tothe global organization of the member firms of EYG.

EYG member firms are grouped into four geographic Areas:Americas; Asia-Pacific; Europe, Middle East, India and Africa(EMEIA); and Japan. The Areas comprise a number ofRegions, which consist of member firms or sections ofthose firms.

EY Denmark is part of the EMEIA Area, which comprisesEYG member firms in 99 countries in Europe, the MiddleEast, India and Africa. Within the EMEIA Area, there are 12Regions. EY Denmark is part of the Nordic Region.

Ernst & Young (EMEIA) Limited (EMEIA Limited), an Englishcompany limited by guarantee, is the principal coordinatingentity for the EYG member firms in the EMEIA Area. EMEIALimited facilitates the coordination of these firms andcooperation between them, but it does not control them.EMEIA Limited is a member firm of EYG, has no financialoperations and does not provide any professional services.

Each Region elects a Regional Partner Forum (RPF), whoserepresentatives advise and act as a sounding board toRegional leadership. The partner elected as PresidingPartner of the RPF also serves as the Region’srepresentative on the Global Governance Council(see page 7).

In Europe, a holding entity, Ernst & Young Europe LLP(EY Europe), was formed in conjunction with EMEIA Limited.EY Europe is an English limited liability partnership, ownedby partners of the EYG member firms operating in Europe. Itis an audit firm registered with the Institute of CharteredAccountants in England and Wales (ICAEW), but it does notcarry out audits or provide any professional services. To theextent permitted by local legal and regulatory requirements,EY Europe has acquired or will acquire control of the EYGmember firms operating in Europe. EY Europe is a memberfirm of both EYG and EMEIA Limited.

EY Europe acquired voting control of EY Denmark.

EY Europe’s principal governing bodies are:

Europe Operating ExecutiveThe Europe Operating Executive (EOE) operates as the boardof EY Europe. It has authority and accountability for strategyexecution and management of EY Europe’s operations. TheEOE comprises: the Europe Managing Partner; the leadersfor Accounts, Talent and Risk Management; the service lineleaders for Assurance, Advisory, Transaction AdvisoryServices and Tax; and all European Regional ManagingPartners.

Europe Governance Sub-CommitteeEY Europe has the Europe Governance Sub-Committee,which includes one representative from each Region inEurope. It serves in an advisory role to the EOE on policies,strategies and other matters, and its approval is required fora number of significant matters, e.g., the appointment of theEurope Managing Partner, approval of the financial reportsof EY Europe and material transactions.

Nordic RegionNordic Regions principal governing bodies are NordicExecutive and Nordic Practice Group.

Nordic Executive:

• Erik Mamelund, Regional Managing Partner• Jesper Koefoed, Deputy Regional Managing Partner• Lars Weigl, Deputy Regional Managing Partner• Mette Storm, Regional Director of Operations• Jesper Koefoed, Assurance Big City and sub-service line

leader• Asbjørn Ler, Assurance Local Region• Christin Erichsen Bøsterud, Tax• Jesper Almström, Transaction Advisory Services• Terje Andersen, Advisory• Ragnar Gustavii, Markets, Accounts and Business

Development• Bjørn Vihovde, Talent• Jaakko Hirvola, Risk Management.

Nordic Practice Group:

• Henrik Kronborg Iversen, Assurance Big City MarketLeader

• Jesper Ridder Olsen, Strategic Growth Markets• Helena Robertsson, Family Business• Ulrika Wass, Brand, Marketing and Communications• Gary Lovett, Business Development• Rudolf Pfaff, Chief Financial Officer• Carina Bergman Marcus, General Counsel• Jan Wellum Svensen, Partner Matters Group.

Page 6: Transparency Report 2016 - EY - US › ... › EY-gennemsigtighedsrapport-2016.pdf · 2019-09-17 · Transparency Report 201 6 — EY Denmark 3 Message from the Country Managing Partner

Transparency Report 2016 — EY Denmark 6

Nordics Regional Partner Forum

Nordics Regional Partner Forum is a governing council forNordic Region with 12 partners chosen by their peers in theNordic countries. Their role is to act as a sounding board andgive input and advice to Nordic Executive. Presiding partnerfor Nordics Regional Partner Forum is Torben Bender, who inthis position also is a member of Global Governance Council(GGC).

EY Denmark

Ernst & Young Godkendt Revisionspartnerselskab has aboard consisting of:

• Erik Mamelund, Chairman• Stefan Persson• Jesper Koefoed.

Jesper Koefoed is CEO and Country Managing Partner inErnst & Young Godkendt Revisionspartnerselskab.

The Danish Assurance leadership is Anders Stig Lauritsen,Big Cities, Peter Klint Eilertsen, Local Regions, and PerGunslev, Professional Practice.

Ernst & Young Godkendt Revisionspartnerselskab is whollyowned by Ernst & Young Partnership P/S, which is owned bypartners resident in Denmark. Some of the Danish partnersare, together with partners from other EYG member firms inEurope, also partners in Ernst & Young Europe LLP, which isa partnership with limited liability registered under UK law.Ernst & Young Europe LLP meets the criteria in respect ofownership and management under the EU’s 8th Directive.

The company is registered with ICAEW (Institute ofChartered Accountants in England and Wales) as an auditfirm, but does not perform audit or render other audit-related services.

Ernst & Young Europe LLP controls Ernst & Young GodkendtRevisionspartnerselskab through the wholly-owned Ernst &Young Europe ApS and Komplementarselskabet af 1. januar2008 A/S as well as the shareholders’ agreement enteredinto with the Danish partners.

The ownership and management structure of Ernst & YoungDanmark's operating entities is illustrated below.

Other EY entities in Denmark

The ownership in respect of client relationships and certainnon-current assets lies with Ernst & Young Danmark A/S andErnst & Young Partnership P/S, which have rented these toErnst & Young Godkendt Revisionspartnerselskab. Ernst &Young Danmark A/S also owns 18/6 1992 StatsautoriseretRevisionsaktieselskab.

The Company's domicile in Copenhagen is owned through EYEjendommen Flintholm K/S, which is wholly owned by Ernst& Young Partnership P/S.

Ernst & Young Godkendt Revisionspartnerselskab, Ernst &Young Godkendt Revisionsaktieselskab, EY GrønlandGodkendt Revisionsanpartsselskab, Ernst & Young EuropeApS and 18/6 1992 Statsautoriseret Revisionsaktieselskabare all approved audit firms, but only Ernst & YoungGodkendt Revisionspartnerselskab and EY GrønlandGodkendt Revisionsanpartsselskab render audit services.

Network arrangementsEY is a global leader in assurance, tax, transaction andadvisory services. Worldwide, 231,000 people in memberfirms in more than 150 countries share a commitment tobuilding a better working world, united by shared values and

Page 7: Transparency Report 2016 - EY - US › ... › EY-gennemsigtighedsrapport-2016.pdf · 2019-09-17 · Transparency Report 201 6 — EY Denmark 3 Message from the Country Managing Partner

Transparency Report 2016 — EY Denmark 7

an unwavering commitment to quality, integrity andprofessional skepticism. In today’s global market, EY’sintegrated approach is particularly important in the deliveryof high-quality multinational audits, which can span multiplejurisdictions.

EY’s central entity, EYG, coordinates the member firms andpromotes cooperation among them. EYG does not provideservices, but its objectives include the promotion ofexceptional, high-quality client service by member firmsworldwide.

Each member firm is a legally distinct entity. Theirobligations and responsibilities are governed by theregulations of EYG and various other agreements.

The structure and principal bodies of the global organizationduring the year ended 30 June 2016 are described below.They reflect the principle that EY, as a global organization,has one shared strategy.

EY streamlined its operating model by creating theExecutive and the Regions. The Executive includes theGlobal Executive (GE), its committees and teams, and theleadership of the four Areas. This streamlined structureallows EY to further enhance its global scale and the delivery

of consistent exceptional client service worldwide, with theExecutive responsible for one global approach to strategy,quality, risk management, business planning, investmentsand priorities.

At the same time, this operating model allows for greaterstakeholder focus in the 28 Regions, permitting memberfirms to build stronger relationships with clients and othersin each country and be more responsive to local needs.

Global Governance CouncilThe Global Governance Council (GGC) is the main oversightbody of EYG. It comprises one or more representatives fromeach Region, other member firm partners as at-largerepresentatives and six independent non-executives (INEs).The Regional representatives, who otherwise do not holdsenior management roles, are elected by their RPFs for athree-year term, with provisions for one successivereappointment. The GGC advises EYG on policies, strategiesand the public interest aspects of their decision-making. Theapproval of the GGC is required for a number of significantmatters that could affect EY.

Page 8: Transparency Report 2016 - EY - US › ... › EY-gennemsigtighedsrapport-2016.pdf · 2019-09-17 · Transparency Report 201 6 — EY Denmark 3 Message from the Country Managing Partner

Transparency Report 2016 — EY Denmark 8

Independent non-executivesIndependent non-executives (INEs) are appointed fromoutside EY and bring the global organization, and the GGC,the significant benefit of their varied perspectives and views.The INEs also form a majority of the Public Interest Sub-Committee of the GGC, which addresses public interestmatters including stakeholder dialogue. The INEs arenominated by a dedicated committee.

Global ExecutiveThe GE brings together EY’s leadership functions, servicesand geographies. It is chaired by the Chairman and CEO ofEYG and includes its Global Managing Partners of ClientService and Business Enablement; the Area ManagingPartners; the global functional leadership for Talent andFinance; the leaders of the global service lines — Assurance,Advisory, Tax and Transaction Advisory Services; the GlobalLeader for Public Policy; and one EYG member firm partneron rotation.

The GE also includes the Chair of the Global AccountsCommittee and the Chair of the Emerging MarketsCommittee, as well as a representative from the emergingmarkets practices.

The GE and the GGC approve nominations for the Chairmanand CEO of EYG, and ratify appointments of the GlobalManaging Partners. The GE also approves appointments ofGlobal Vice Chairs. The GGC ratifies the appointments of anyGlobal Vice Chair who serves as a member of the GE.Furthermore, the GE appoints Area Managing Partners andapproves appointments of Regional Managing Partners. Theappointments of the Area Managing Partners are subject toratification by the GGC.

GE’s responsibilities include the promotion of globalobjectives and the development, approval and, whererelevant, implementation of:

• Global strategies and plans• Common standards, methodologies and policies to be

promoted within member firms• People initiatives, including criteria and processes for

admission, evaluation, development, reward andretirement of partners

• Quality improvement and protection programs• Proposals regarding regulatory matters and

public policy• Policies and guidance relating to member firms’ service

of international clients, business development, marketsand branding

• EY’s development funds and investment priorities• EYG’s annual financial reports and budgets• GGC recommendations• Any other proposal that supports the global objectivesIt also has the power to mediate and adjudicate disputesbetween member firms.

GE committeesEstablished by the GE and bringing together representativesfrom the four Areas, the GE committees are responsible formaking recommendations to the GE. There are committeesfor Global Markets and Investments, Global Accounts,Emerging Markets, Talent, Risk Management, Assurance,Advisory, Tax, and Transaction Advisory Services, and thereis the Global Audit Committee.

Global Practice GroupThis group brings together the members of the GE, GEcommittees and Regional leaders. The Global Practice Groupseeks to promote a common understanding of EY’s strategicobjectives and consistency of execution across theorganization.

EYG member firmsUnder the regulations of EYG, member firms committhemselves to pursue EY’s objectives, such as the provisionof high-quality service worldwide. To that end, the memberfirms undertake to implement the global strategies andplans, and to maintain the prescribed scope of servicecapability. They are required to comply with commonstandards, methodologies and policies, including thoseregarding audit methodology, quality and risk management,independence, knowledge sharing, human resources, andtechnology.

Above all, EYG member firms commit to conducting theirprofessional practices in accordance with applicableprofessional and ethical standards and all applicablerequirements of law. This commitment to integrity and doingthe right thing is underpinned by EY’s Global Code ofConduct and EY’s values (see page 11).

Besides adopting the regulations of EYG, member firmsenter into several other agreements covering aspects oftheir membership in the EY organization such as the rightand obligation to use the EY name and the sharing ofknowledge.

Member firms are subject to reviews that evaluate theiradherence to EYG requirements and policies governingissues such as independence, quality and risk management,audit methodology and human resources. As necessary,special focus reviews are performed to address situations orconcerns as they arise. Member firms unable to meet thequality commitments and other EYG membershiprequirements may be subject to separation from the EYorganization.

Page 9: Transparency Report 2016 - EY - US › ... › EY-gennemsigtighedsrapport-2016.pdf · 2019-09-17 · Transparency Report 201 6 — EY Denmark 3 Message from the Country Managing Partner

Transparency Report 2016 — EY Denmark 9

Commitment to qualityInfrastructure supporting qualityQuality in our service linesVision 2020, which sets out EY’s purpose, ambition andstrategy, calls for EY member firms to provide exceptionalclient service worldwide. This is supported by an unwaveringcommitment to quality and service that is professionally andglobally consistent, and means service that is based onobjectivity, professional skepticism and adherence to EY andprofessional standards.

EY service lines are accountable for delivering qualityengagements, including managing quality reviews and real-time quality assurance of engagements, which measurescompliance with professional standards and all EY policies.

Vision 2020 has reinforced the ownership of qualitywithin the service lines, including audit. It has alsoresulted in increased clarity around the role of riskmanagement in policies and practices that support andimprove quality audit.

The Global Vice Chair of Assurance coordinates memberfirms’ compliance with and implementation of EY policiesand procedures for assurance services.

Professional PracticeThe Global Vice Chair of Professional Practice, referred to asthe Professional Practice Director (PPD), is overseen by theGlobal Vice Chair of Assurance and works directly with theArea PPDs to establish global audit quality control policiesand procedures. Each of the Area PPDs is overseen by theGlobal PPD and the related Area Assurance Leader. Thishelps provide greater assurance as to the objectivity of auditquality and consultation processes.

The Global PPD and Area PPDs also lead and oversee theProfessional Practice group. This is a Global and Areanetwork of technical subject matter specialists in accountingand auditing standards who consult on accounting, auditing,and financial reporting matters and perform various practicemonitoring and risk management activities.

The Global PPD oversees development of the EY Global AuditMethodology (EY GAM) and related technologies to beconsistent with relevant professional standards andregulatory requirements. The Professional Practice groupalso oversees the development of the guidance, training andmonitoring programs and processes used by member firmprofessionals to execute audits consistently and effectively.The PPDs, together with other professionals who work withthem in each member firm, are knowledgeable about EYpeople, clients and processes, and are readily accessible forconsultation with audit engagement teams.

Additional resources often augment the ProfessionalPractice group, including networks of professionalsfocused on:

• Accounting, auditing and risk issues for specificindustries and sectors

• General engagement issues and how to work effectivelywith audit committees

Risk managementResponsibility for the delivery of high quality service andownership of the risks associated with quality is placed in theservice lines. The Global Risk Management Leader overseesthe management of these risks by the service lines, as hedoes in respect of other risks across the organization as partof the broader Enterprise Risk Management framework, andcontinues to work with the service lines on significant risks.

Member firm partners are appointed to lead riskmanagement initiatives in the service lines and memberfirms, supported by other staff and professionals. The GlobalRisk Management Leader is responsible for establishingglobally consistent risk management execution priorities andenterprise-wide risk management. These priorities cascadeto member firms, and their execution is monitored throughan Enterprise Risk Management program.

Page 10: Transparency Report 2016 - EY - US › ... › EY-gennemsigtighedsrapport-2016.pdf · 2019-09-17 · Transparency Report 201 6 — EY Denmark 3 Message from the Country Managing Partner

Transparency Report 2016 — EY Denmark 10

Global confidentiality policyProtecting confidential information is engrained in theeveryday activities of EYG member firms. Respect forintellectual capital, and all other sensitive and restrictedinformation, is established within the Global Code ofConduct, which provides a clear set of behaviors expected ofall EY people. In order to further enhance this approach toprotecting information, and to reflect the ever-increasinguse and distribution of restricted data, EYG launched a newGlobal Confidentiality Policy in 2015. This policy providesadded clarity to EY people and forms the fundamentalelement of a wider approach that includes other key policieson conflicts of interest, personal data privacy and recordsretention. Other elements of the approach include:

• Social media guidance• Information handling requirements• Knowledge sharing protocols

Components of audit quality control programIn the following sections, we describe the principalcomponents of the EY Denmark audit quality controlprogram:

• Instilling professional values• Internal quality control system• Client acceptance and continuance• Performing audits• Review and consultation• Audit partner rotation• Audit quality reviews• External quality-assurance reviews• Compliance with legal requirements

Instilling professional valuesSustainable Audit QualityWe understand that audit quality is our primary goal, andthis is reflected in the launch of our Sustainable AuditQuality (SAQ) program. SAQ is our globally consistentapproach to implementing the highest level of audit qualityacross the organization. Launched in 2015, it is the highestpriority for our Assurance practice.

We use the word “sustainable” in SAQ to demonstrate thatthis is not a one-off, short-term initiative, but an ongoingprocess of improvement. EY has had a common auditmethodology for some time, and now we have a commonlanguage and processes regarding audit quality.

There are six components to SAQ: tone at the top; people;simplification; transformation and innovation; enablement,quality support and monitoring; and accountability. SAQ isimplemented by each member firm and is coordinated andoverseen globally.

We are constantly reinforcing the importance of the sixcomponents. It is something we talk about to every regionalAssurance leader and every partner. Audit quality and thekey elements of SAQ are something every senior manager,manager and team member must understand and becommitted to implementing locally. SAQ is essential to allour goals and ambitions.

Tone at the topEY leadership and partners are responsible for setting theright tone at the top and demonstrating EY’s commitment tobuilding a better working world through behavior andactions. While the tone at the top is vital, our people alsounderstand that quality and professional responsibility startwith them. Our shared values, which inspire our people andguide them to do the right thing, and our commitment toquality are embedded in who we are and in everything wedo.

Our approach to business ethics and integrity is contained inthe EY Global Code of Conduct and other policies and isembedded in our culture of consultation, training programsand internal communications. Senior management regularlyreinforces the importance of performing quality work,complying with professional standards and adhering toour policies, leading by example and through variouscommunications. Also, our quality review programs assessprofessional service as a key metric in evaluating andrewarding all professionals.

Our culture strongly supports collaboration and placesspecial emphasis on the importance of consultation indealing with complex or subjective accounting, auditing,reporting, regulatory and independence matters. We believeit is important to determine that engagement teams andclients correctly follow consultation advice, and weemphasize this when necessary.

Our consistent stance has been that no client is moreimportant than our professional reputation — thereputation of EY Denmark and the reputation of each ofour professionals.

Page 11: Transparency Report 2016 - EY - US › ... › EY-gennemsigtighedsrapport-2016.pdf · 2019-09-17 · Transparency Report 201 6 — EY Denmark 3 Message from the Country Managing Partner

Transparency Report 2016 — EY Denmark 11

Code of conductWe promote a culture of integrity among our professionals.The EY Global Code of Conduct provides a clear set ofstandards that guide our actions and our business conduct.It is organized into five categories containing principles thatare to be followed by everyone at EY Denmark to guidebehavior across all areas of activity:

• Working with one another• Working with clients and others• Acting with professional integrity• Maintaining our objectivity and independence• Respecting intellectual capitalThrough our procedures to monitor compliance withthe EY Global Code of Conduct, and through frequentcommunications, we strive to create an environment thatencourages all personnel to act responsibly, includingreporting misconduct without fear of retaliation.

The EY Ethics Hotline provides our people, clients and othersoutside of the organization with a means to report activityconfidentially that may involve unethical or improperbehavior and that may be in violation of professionalstandards or otherwise inconsistent with the EY GlobalCode of Conduct. The hotline is operated by an externalorganization that provides confidential and, if desired,anonymous hotline reporting services for companiesworldwide.

When a report comes into the EY Ethics Hotline, either byphone or internet, it receives immediate attention.Depending on the content of the report, appropriateindividuals from Risk Management, Talent, Legal or otherfunctions are involved to address the report. All matters arehandled by experienced individuals, with oversight from theglobal Risk Management function. For those matters that arereported outside of the EY Ethics Hotline, the sameprocedures are followed.

Our valuesWho we are

People who demonstrate integrity, respect and teaming

People with energy, enthusiasm and the courage to lead

People who build relationships based on doing the right thing

Internal quality control systemEY Denmark’s reputation for providing high-qualityprofessional audit services independently, objectively andethically is fundamental to our success as independentauditors. We continue to invest in initiatives to promoteenhanced objectivity, independence and professionalskepticism. These are fundamental attributes of ahigh-quality audit.

At EY Denmark, our role as auditors is to provide assuranceon the fair presentation of the financial statements of thecompanies we audit. We bring together qualified teams toprovide our services, drawing on our proven experienceacross industry sectors and services. We continually strive toimprove our quality and risk management processes so thatthe quality of our service is at a consistently high level.

We recognize that in today’s environment — characterized bycontinuing globalization and the rapid movement of capital —the quality of our audit services has never been moreimportant. As part of Vision 2020, EY continues toinvest heavily in developing and maintaining our auditmethodology, tools and other resources needed tosupport quality service delivery.

While the market and stakeholders continue to demand high-quality audits, they also demand increasingly efficient andeffective delivery of audit services. In addition to theinvestment mentioned, EY continues to seek ways toimprove the effectiveness and the efficiency of its auditmethodology and processes, while maintaining audit quality.

We work to understand where our audit quality may not beup to our own expectations and those of stakeholders,including external audit firm regulators. We seek to learnfrom external and internal inspection activities and toidentify root causes of adverse quality occurrences to enableus to continually improve audit quality, and we believe thatan important part of the audit inspections process is to takeeffective and appropriate actions to improve quality.

Effectiveness of the quality control systemEY has designed and implemented a comprehensive set ofglobal audit quality control policies and practices. Thesepolicies and practices meet the requirements of theInternational Standards on Quality Control issued by theInternational Auditing and Assurance Standards Board(IAASB). EY Denmark has adopted these global policies andprocedures and has supplemented them as necessary tocomply with local laws and professional guidelines, and toaddress specific business needs.

Page 12: Transparency Report 2016 - EY - US › ... › EY-gennemsigtighedsrapport-2016.pdf · 2019-09-17 · Transparency Report 201 6 — EY Denmark 3 Message from the Country Managing Partner

Transparency Report 2016 — EY Denmark 12

We also execute the EY Audit Quality Review (AQR) programin order to evaluate whether our system of audit qualitycontrol has operated effectively so as to provide reasonableassurance that EY Denmark and our people comply withapplicable professional and internal standards, andregulatory requirements.

The results of the AQR program and external inspections areevaluated and communicated within EY Denmark to providethe basis for continual improvement in audit quality,consistent with the highest standards in the profession.

The GE is responsible for implementing quality improvementand protection programs. As such, it reviews the results ofour internal AQR program and external regulatory reviews,as well as any key actions designed to address areas forimprovement.

The recent results of such monitoring, together with therecent feedback from independent regulatory inspectionvisits, provide EY Denmark with a basis to conclude that ourinternal control systems are designed appropriately and areoperating effectively.

Client acceptance andcontinuanceEY policyThe Client Acceptance and Continuance Policy sets outprinciples for member firms to determine whether to accepta new client or a new engagement, or to continue with anexisting client or engagement. These principles arefundamental to maintaining quality, managing risk,protecting our people and meeting regulatoryrequirements. The objectives of the policy are to:

• Establish a rigorous process for evaluating risk andmaking decisions to accept or continue clients orengagements

• Meet applicable independence requirements• Identify and deal appropriately with any conflicts

of interest• Identify and decline clients that pose excessive risk• Require consultation with designated professionals to

identify additional risk management procedures forspecific high-risk factors

• Comply with legal, regulatory and professionalrequirements

In addition, the EY Conflicts of Interest Global Policy definesglobal standards for addressing categories of potentialconflicts of interest and a process for identifying them. Italso includes provisions for managing potential conflicts ofinterest as quickly and efficiently as possible through the useof appropriate safeguards. Such safeguards range fromobtaining a client’s consent for EY member firms to act fortwo or more clients to declining an engagement in order toavoid an identified conflict.

The EY Conflicts of Interest Global Policy, and associatedguidance, was updated in early 2015. The updates take intoaccount the increasing complexity of our engagements andclient relationships, and the need for speed and accuracy inresponding to our clients. They also align with the latestInternational Ethics Standards Board for Accountants(IESBA) standards.

Putting policy into practiceWe use the EY Global Tool for Acceptance and Continuance(GTAC), an intranet-based system, for efficientlycoordinating client and engagement acceptance andcontinuance activities in line with global, service line andmember firm policies. GTAC takes users through theacceptance and continuance requirements, and identifies thepolicies and references to professional standards needed toassess both business opportunities and associated risks.

As part of this process, we carefully consider the riskcharacteristics of a prospective client and several duediligence procedures. Before we take on a new engagementor client, we determine if we can commit sufficient resourcesto deliver quality service, especially in highly technical areas,and if the services the client wants are appropriate for usto provide. The approval process is rigorous, and no newaudit engagement may be accepted without the approval ofour PPD.

In our annual client continuance process, we review ourservice delivery and ability to continue to provide qualityservice and confirm that clients share EY Denmark’scommitment to quality and transparency in financialreporting. The partner in charge of each audit, together withour Assurance leadership, annually reviews our relationshipwith the audit client to determine whether continuance isappropriate.

As a result of this review, certain audit engagements areidentified as requiring, and are then subjected to, additionaloversight procedures during the audit (close monitoring),and some audit clients are discontinued. As with the clientacceptance process, our PPD is involved in the clientcontinuance process and must agree with the continuancedecisions.

Page 13: Transparency Report 2016 - EY - US › ... › EY-gennemsigtighedsrapport-2016.pdf · 2019-09-17 · Transparency Report 201 6 — EY Denmark 3 Message from the Country Managing Partner

Transparency Report 2016 — EY Denmark 13

Both client acceptance and client continuance decisionsconsider the engagement team’s assessment of whetherthe company’s management could pressure us to acceptinappropriate accounting, auditing and reporting conclusionsto undermine quality. Considerations and conclusions on theintegrity of management are essentialto acceptance and continuance decisions.

Performing auditsAs part of Vision 2020, EY has invested significantly inimproving our audit methodologies and tools, with the goalof performing the highest-quality audits in the profession.This investment is consistent with EY’s goal to have theleading audit practice in the profession by 2020 and reflectsour commitment to building trust and confidence in thecapital markets and in economies the world over.

Audit methodologyThe EY Global Audit Methodology (EY GAM) provides aglobal framework for delivering high-quality audit servicesthrough the consistent application of thought processes,judgments and procedures in all audit engagements.Making risk assessments, reconsidering and modifyingthem as appropriate, and using these assessments todetermine the nature, timing and extent of audit proceduresare fundamental to EY GAM. The methodology alsoemphasizes applying appropriate professional skepticismin the execution of audit procedures. EY GAM is based onInternational Standards on Auditing (ISAs) and issupplemented in Denmark to comply with the localadditional requirements under Danish audit regulation.

The EY auditor is presented with a version of EY GAMorganized by topic and designed to focus our audit strategyon the financial statement risks and the design andexecution of the appropriate audit response to those risks.EY GAM consists of two key components: requirements andguidance, and supporting forms and examples. Therequirements and guidance reflect both the audit standardsand EY policies. The forms and examples include leadingpractice illustrations and assist in performing anddocumenting audit procedures.

Using technology, EY GAM can be “profiled” or tailored topresent the relevant requirements and guidance, dependingon the nature of the entity being audited. For example, thereare profiles for listed entitles and for those considerednoncomplex entities.

Enhancements to the audit methodology are made regularlyas a result of new standards, emerging auditing issues andmatters, implementation experiences, and external andinternal inspection results. In 2016, EY GAM was updated toinclude the new and revised ISAs dealing with auditorreporting, other information included in an annual reportand financial statement disclosures. We also enhanced EYGAM by adding guidance to address common questions fromaudit teams and issues arising from inspections.

In addition, we monitor current and emergingdevelopments continually and issue timely audit planningand other reminders. These reminders emphasize areasnoted during inspections as well as other key topics ofinterest to our regulators, including the International Forumof Independent Audit Regulators (IFIAR). These topicsinclude professional skepticism, group audits, revenuerecognition and engagement quality reviews.

EY GAM requires compliance with relevant ethicalrequirements, including independence from the companywe audit.

TechnologyOur audit engagement teams use technology to assist inexecuting and documenting the work performed inaccordance with EY GAM. Beginning in late fiscal year 2015,EY launched the next generation global audit platform EYCanvas, on a phased basis across EYG member firmsglobally. The deployment continues and EY Denmark will becompleted in fiscal year 2017. EY Canvas is web-based, builtusing state-of-the-art technology to provide heightened datasecurity and allows us to evolve our software to respond tochanges in the accounting profession and regulatoryenvironment.

Through the use of profile questions, audit engagements inEY Canvas are automatically configured with informationrelevant to the company’s listing requirements and industry,helping keep our audit plans customized and up-to-date byproviding direct linkage to our audit guidance, professionalstandards and documentation templates. It is built with afresh, clear design and user interface that allows users tovisualize risks and their relationship to our planned responseand work performed in key areas. EY Canvas also enables alinkage for our group audit teams to communicate interofficerisks and instructions so that the primary audit team candirect execution and monitor performance of the groupaudit. Over the coming year, we will phase out ourpredecessor audit support tool, GAMx.

Audit engagement teams use other software applications,forms and templates during various phases of an audit toassist in executing procedures, making and documentingaudit conclusions, and performing analysis.

Page 14: Transparency Report 2016 - EY - US › ... › EY-gennemsigtighedsrapport-2016.pdf · 2019-09-17 · Transparency Report 201 6 — EY Denmark 3 Message from the Country Managing Partner

Transparency Report 2016 — EY Denmark 14

EY Helix is our suite of data analytic tools for use in audits.These help our engagement teams analyze a company’sdata, enhancing our risk assessment processes and enablingthe audit of higher-risk transactions.

EY Helix is already assisting our people to ask betterquestions about audit findings and evaluating the outcomes.Analytics are transforming the audit by analyzing largerpopulations of audit-relevant data, identifying unseenpatterns and trends in that data, and helping to direct ouraudit efforts. The use of analytics also allows us to obtainbetter perspectives, richer insights and a deeperunderstanding of transactions and areas of risk.

Formation of audit engagement teamsEY Denmark’s policies require an annual review of partnerassignments by our Assurance leadership and PPD to makesure that the professionals leading listed-company auditspossess the appropriate competencies (i.e., the knowledge,skills and abilities) to fulfill their engagement responsibilitiesand are in compliance with applicable auditor rotationregulations.

The assignment of professionals to an audit engagement isalso made under the direction of our Assurance leadership.Factors considered when assigning people to audit teamsinclude competence, engagement size and complexity,specialized industry knowledge and experience, timing ofwork, continuity and opportunities for on-the-job training.For more complex engagements, consideration is given towhether specialized or additional expertise is needed tosupplement or enhance the audit engagement team.

In many situations, internal specialists are assigned as partof the audit engagement team to assist in performing auditprocedures and obtaining appropriate audit evidence. Theseprofessionals are used in situations requiring special skills orknowledge, such as information systems, asset valuation andactuarial analysis.

Review and consultationReviews of audit workOur policies describe the requirements for timely and directsenior professional participation as well as the level ofreview required for the work performed. Supervisorymembers of the audit engagement team perform a detailedreview of the audit documentation for accuracy andcompleteness. Senior audit executives and/or engagementpartners perform a second-level review to determineadequacy of the audit work as a whole and the relatedaccounting and financial statement presentation. A taxrepresentative reviews the significant tax and other relevantworking papers. For listed and certain other companies, anengagement quality reviewer (described below) reviewsimportant areas of accounting, financial reporting and audit

execution, as well as the financial statements of thecompany we audit and our audit report.

The nature, timing and extent of the reviews of audit workdepend on many factors, including:

• The risk, materiality, subjectivity and complexity of thesubject matter

• The ability and experience of the audit team memberspreparing the audit documentation

• The level of the reviewer’s direct participation in theaudit work

• The extent of consultation employedOur policies also describe the roles and responsibilities ofeach audit engagement team member for managing,directing and supervising the audit, as well as therequirements for documenting their work and conclusions.

Consultation requirementsOur consultation policies are built upon a culture ofcollaboration, whereby audit professionals are encouragedto share perspectives on complex accounting, auditing andreporting issues. Consultation requirements and relatedpolicies are designed to involve the right resources so thataudit teams reach appropriate conclusions.

Consultation is built into the decision-making process; itis not just a process to provide advice.

For complex and sensitive matters, we have a formal processrequiring consultation outside of the audit engagement teamwith other personnel who have more experience orspecialized knowledge, primarily Professional Practice andIndependence personnel. In the interests of objectivity andprofessional skepticism, our policies require members ofProfessional Practice, Independence and certain others towithdraw from a consultation if they currently serve, or haverecently served, the client to which the consultation relates.

Our policies also require that we document all consultations,including written concurrence from the person or personsconsulted, in order to demonstrate their understanding ofthe matter and its resolution.

Engagement quality reviewsEngagement quality reviews are performed by auditpartners in compliance with professional standards for auditsof all listed companies and those considered higher risk.Engagement quality reviewers are experienced professionalswith significant subject matter knowledge. They areindependent of the engagement team and ableto provide objective evaluation of significant accounting,auditing and reporting matters. In no circumstances maythe responsibility of the engagement quality reviewer bedelegated to another individual.

Page 15: Transparency Report 2016 - EY - US › ... › EY-gennemsigtighedsrapport-2016.pdf · 2019-09-17 · Transparency Report 201 6 — EY Denmark 3 Message from the Country Managing Partner

Transparency Report 2016 — EY Denmark 15

The engagement quality review spans the entireengagement cycle, including planning, risk assessment,audit strategy and execution. Policies and procedures for theperformance and documentation of engagement qualityreviews provide specific guidelines on the nature, timing andextent of the procedures to be performed and the requireddocumentation evidencing their completion. Our PPDapproves all engagement quality review assignments forlisted companies and those considered higher risk.

Audit engagement team resolution process fordifferences of professional opinionEY has a collaborative culture that encourages and expectspeople to speak up, without fear of reprisal, if a differenceof professional opinion arises or if they are uncomfortableabout a matter relating to a client engagement. Policiesand procedures are designed to empower members of anaudit engagement team by requiring them to raise anydisagreements relating to significant accounting, auditingor reporting matters.

These policies are made clear to people as they join EY, andwe continue to promote a culture that reinforces a person’sresponsibility and authority to make their own views heardand canvas the views of others.

Differences of professional opinion that arise during an auditare generally resolved at the audit engagement team level.However, if any person involved in the discussion of an issueis not satisfied with the decision, he or she has both theright and the obligation to see that the issue is referred tothe next level of authority until agreement is reached or afinal decision is made. Until such time, the parties to thediscussion do not withdraw, step aside or otherwise extractthemselves from the process.

Furthermore, if the engagement quality reviewer makesrecommendations that the engagement partner does notaccept or the matter is not resolved to the reviewer’ssatisfaction, the audit report is not issued until the matter isresolved by following consultation processes for resolvingdifferences of professional opinion. Our documentationrequirements for disagreements and their resolution are thesame as for other consultations. Anyone involved in theprocess may separately document his or her personalposition in an attachment to the documentation of the finaldecision.

Audit partner rotationEY supports mandatory audit partner rotation to helpstrengthen auditor independence. EY Denmark complieswith the audit partner rotation requirements of the code ofthe International Ethics Standards Board for Accountants(IESBA), EU Regulation 537/2014 of the EuropeanParliament and of the Counsel of 16 April 2014 (EU537/2014), and the Danish Auditors Act and related

executive orders, as well as the U.S. Securities and ExchangeCommission (SEC), where required.

EY Denmark supports audit partner rotation because itprovides a fresh perspective and promotes independencefrom company management while retaining expertise andknowledge of the business. Audit partner rotation, combinedwith independence requirements, enhanced systems ofinternal quality controls and independent audit oversight,helps strengthen independence and objectivity and areimportant safeguards of audit quality.

For a new public interest entity (including a newly listedcompany) client, the lead engagement partner and theengagement quality reviewer may remain in place for anadditional two years before rotating off the team, regardlessof the time they served prior to the listing. Followingrotation, the partner may not resume the lead orengagement quality review role until at least 3 yearshave elapsed.

We employ tools to track partner rotation that enableeffective monitoring of compliance with requirements.We have also implemented a process for partner rotationplanning and decision-making that involves consultationwith, and approvals by, our Professional Practice andIndependence professionals.

Audit quality reviewsThe Global Audit Quality Review (AQR) program is thecornerstone of our process to monitor audit quality. EYDenmark executes the Global AQR program, reports resultsand develops responsive actions plans. The primary goal ofthe program is to determine whether systems of qualitycontrols are appropriately designed and followed in theexecution of audit engagements to provide reasonableassurance of compliance with policies and procedures,professional standards, and regulatory requirements. TheGlobal AQR program complies with guidelines in theInternational Standard on Quality Control No. 1, as amended(ISQC No. 1), and is supplemented where necessary tocomply with Danish professional standards and regulatoryrequirements. It also aids EY Denmark’s continual efforts toidentify areas where we can improve our performance orenhance our policies and procedures.

Implemented annually, the program is coordinated andmonitored by representatives of the PPD network, withoversight by the Assurance leadership.

The AQR program ensures that all signing auditors in chargeof audit engagements are supervised over a three-yearperiod.

The engagements reviewed each year are selected on a risk-based approach emphasizing audit engagements that arelarge, complex or of significant public interest. The Global

Page 16: Transparency Report 2016 - EY - US › ... › EY-gennemsigtighedsrapport-2016.pdf · 2019-09-17 · Transparency Report 201 6 — EY Denmark 3 Message from the Country Managing Partner

Transparency Report 2016 — EY Denmark 16

AQR program includes detailed, risk-focused file reviewscovering a large sample of listed and non-listed auditengagements to measure compliance with internal policiesand procedures, EY GAM requirements, and relevant localprofessional standards and regulatory requirements. It alsoincludes reviews of a sample of non-audit engagements.These measure compliance with the relevant professionalstandards and internal policies and procedures that shouldbe applied in executing non-audit services. In addition,practice-level reviews are performed to assess compliancewith quality control policies and procedures in the functionalareas set out in ISQC No. 1. The Global AQR programcomplements external practice monitoring and inspectionactivities, such as regulatory inspection programs (theDanish Business Authority) and external peer reviews.

In EY Denmark, the global AQR program is supplemented bya Nordic AQR program directed at small and medium-sizedaudit engagements. Thus, EY Denmark carries through twoannual, AQR programs. The Global AQR program (auditengagements involving more than 200 audit hours) and theNordic AQR program (audit engagements involving less than200 audit hours).

AQR reviewers and team leaders are selected for their skillsand professional competence in accounting and auditing, aswell as their industry specialization; they often work in theAQR programs for a number of years and are highly skilled inthe execution of the programs. In the Global AQR program,team leaders and reviewers are assigned to inspectionsoutside of their home location and are independent of theaudit teams reviewed. In the Nordic AQR program, reviewersare allocated to other offices than those with which they arenormally associated and are also independent of the auditteams reviewed.

The results of the AQR programs and external practice-monitoring and inspection activities are evaluated andcommunicated to improve quality. Any quality improvementplans describe the follow-up actions to be taken, the peopleresponsible, the timetable and deadlines, and sign-off oncompleted actions. Measures to resolve audit quality mattersnoted from the Global AQR and Nordic AQR programs,regulatory inspections and peer reviews are addressed byour Assurance leadership and our PPD with input from RiskManagement groups. The actions are monitored by our PPDand Assurance leadership. These programs provideimportant practice monitoring feedback for our continuingquality improvement efforts.

In 2016, the Global AQR in Denmark (audit engagementsinvolving more than 200 audit hours) comprised a review of40 audit engagements of which 2were found to havematerial findings. In 2016, the Nordic AQR (auditengagements involving less than 200 audit hours) compriseda review of 29 audit engagements of which 1 were found tohave material findings.

Irrespective of whether significant or less significantobservations or findings are identified, EY Denmark assessesthe results from internal and external supervisors to find theunderlying reasons, draw up action plans and seek toimprove the audit quality.

External quality assurancereviewEY Denmark’s audit practice is subject to inspection by theDanish Business Authority. As part of its inspections, theDanish Business Authority evaluates quality control systemsand reviews selected engagements.

The last quality assurance inspection ended in May 2016and the final report has not yet been issued.

The prior mandatory quality control was made in November2012. We refer to Transparency Report 2013 dated 26February 2014 for KPMG Chartered Accountant Company(now Ernst & Young Godkendt Revisionspartnerselskab).

We respect and benefit from the Danish Business Authority’sinspection process. We thoroughly evaluate points raisedduring the inspection in order to identify areas where we canimprove audit quality. Together with our AQR process,external inspections aid us in making our audits and relatedcontrol processes of the highest quality in the interests ofinvestors and other stakeholders.

Following the most recent amendment to the Danish Act onApproved Auditors and Audit Firms, EY Denmark will besubject to an annual inspection by the Danish BusinessAuthority going forward, expectedly for the first time in2017.

Information on the above-mentioned regulator can be foundon its website https://erhvervsstyrelsen.dk/revision-og-revisorer

Page 17: Transparency Report 2016 - EY - US › ... › EY-gennemsigtighedsrapport-2016.pdf · 2019-09-17 · Transparency Report 201 6 — EY Denmark 3 Message from the Country Managing Partner

Transparency Report 2016 — EY Denmark 17

Compliance with legalrequirementsThe EY Global Code of Conduct provides a clear set ofstandards that guide our actions and business conduct.EY Denmark complies with applicable laws and regulations,and EY’s values underpin our commitment to doing the rightthing. This important commitment is supported by a numberof policies and procedures, including:

Anti-briberyThe Anti-bribery Global Policy provides our people withdirection around certain unethical and illegal activities. Itemphasizes the obligation of our people to comply with anti-bribery laws and provides greater definition of whatconstitutes bribery. It also identifies reportingresponsibilities when bribery is discovered. In recognition ofthe growing global impact of bribery and corruption, effortshave been increased to embed anti-bribery measures acrossEY, and training is mandated for all our people.

Insider tradingThe Insider Trading Global Policy reaffirms the obligation ofour people not to trade in securities with insider information,provides detail on what constitutes insider information andidentifies with whom our people should consult if they havequestions regarding their responsibilities.

Trade sanctionsGiven the level of EY’s global integration, it is important thatwe are aware of the ever-changing situation in respect ofinternational trade sanctions. EY monitors sanctions issuedin multiple geographies and provides guidance to our peopleon impacted activities.

Data privacyThe Global Personal Data Privacy Policy sets out theprinciples to be applied to the use and protection of personaldata, including that relating to current, past and prospectivepersonnel, clients, suppliers and business associates. Thispolicy is consistent with applicable laws and regulationsconcerning data protection and privacy for maintaining andprocessing personal data. When we engage with clients, EYDenmark addresses specific Danish data privacyrequirements and business needs.

Money Laundering

EY Denmark focuses on compliance with the provisions inthe Danish act on preventive measures against moneylaundering and financing of terrorism (the Danish Act onMoney Laundering).

We have established a policy and a process to ensure that EYDenmark complies with these provisions. Each individualpartner and employee is under an obligation to comply withthe processes relating to examination, assessment anddocumentation requirements and, if required, involve therelevant EY person in charge of compliance with Danishmoney laundering provisions. The policy and the procedureapply to all partners and employees in EY Denmark, nomatter their function or service line.

Document retentionEY Denmark’s record retention policy applies to allengagements and personnel. This policy emphasizes that alldocuments must be preserved whenever any personbecomes aware of any actual or reasonably anticipatedclaim, litigation, investigation, subpoena or othergovernment proceeding involving us or one of our clientsthat may relate to our work. It also addresses Danish legalrequirements applicable to the creation and maintenance ofworking papers relevant to the work performed.

Page 18: Transparency Report 2016 - EY - US › ... › EY-gennemsigtighedsrapport-2016.pdf · 2019-09-17 · Transparency Report 201 6 — EY Denmark 3 Message from the Country Managing Partner

Transparency Report 2016 — EY Denmark 18

Independence practicesEY Independence policies require EY Denmark and ourpeople to comply with the independence standardsapplicable to specific engagements, including, for example,the independence standards of the International EthicsStandards Board for Accountants (IESBA) of theInternational Federation of Accountants (IFAC) and Danishlaw.

We consider and evaluate independence from severalperspectives, including: our financial relationships and thoseof our people; employment relationships; businessrelationships; the permissibility of non-audit services weprovide to audit clients; partner rotation; fee arrangements;audit committee preapproval, where applicable; and partnerremuneration and compensation.

Failure to comply with applicable professionalindependence requirements will factor into a person’spromotion and compensation decisions and may lead toother disciplinary measures, including separation fromEY Denmark.

EY Denmark has implemented EY’s global applications, toolsand processes to support us, our professionals and otheremployees in complying with independence policies.

EY Global Independence PolicyThe EY Global Independence Policy contains theindependence requirements for member firms, professionalsand other personnel. It is a robust policy predicated on theIESBA Code of Ethics, supplemented with more stringentrequirements where prescribed by a given regulator. Thepolicy also contains guidance to help people apply theindependence rules. The EY Global Independence Policyis readily accessible and easily searchable throughEY’s intranet.

Global Independence SystemThe Global Independence System (GIS) is an intranet-basedtool that helps our professionals identify the listed entitiesfrom which independence is required and the independencerestrictions that apply. Most often, these are listed auditclients and their affiliates, but they can be other types ofattest or assurance clients too. The tool includes family-treedata relating to affiliates of listed audit clients and isupdated by client-serving engagement teams. The entity

data includes notations that indicate the independence rulesthat apply to each entity, helping our people determine thetype of services that can be provided or other interests orrelationships that can be entered into.

Global Monitoring SystemThe Global Monitoring System (GMS) is another importantglobal tool that assists in identifying proscribed securitiesand other impermissible financial interests. Professionalsranked as manager and above are required to enter anysecurities they hold, or those held by their immediate family,into the GMS. When a person enters a proscribed security orif a security they hold becomes proscribed, they receive anotice and are required to dispose of the security. Identifiedexceptions are reported through the Global IndependenceIncident Reporting System (GIIRS) for regulatory matters.

GMS also facilitates annual and quarterly confirmation ofcompliance with independence policies, as described below.

Independence complianceEY has established a number of processes and programsaimed at monitoring the compliance with independencerequirements of EY member firms and their people. Theseinclude the following activities, programs and processes:

Independence confirmations

Timely and accurate completion of annual and quarterlyindependence confirmations is a high priority for theresponsible leadership teams.

Annually, EY Denmark is included in an Area-wide process toconfirm compliance with the Global Independence Policy andrequirements and to report identified exceptions, if any.

All EY professionals, and certain others based on their roleor function, are required to confirm compliance withindependence policies and procedures at least once a year.All partners are required to confirm compliance quarterly.

Global independence compliance reviews

EY conducts member firm visits to assess compliance withindependence matters. These reviews include aspects ofcompliance related to non-audit services, businessrelationships with the companies we audit and financialrelationships of member firms.

The last Global Internal Audit occurred in EY Denmark during2015/16.

Page 19: Transparency Report 2016 - EY - US › ... › EY-gennemsigtighedsrapport-2016.pdf · 2019-09-17 · Transparency Report 201 6 — EY Denmark 3 Message from the Country Managing Partner

Transparency Report 2016 — EY Denmark 19

Personal independence compliance testing

Each year, EY’s global Independence team establishes aprogram for testing compliance with personal independenceconfirmation requirements and with reporting of informationinto GMS. For the 2015/16 testing cycle, EY Denmark testedmore than 70 partners and other personnel.

Non-audit services

We monitor compliance with professional standardsgoverning the provision of non-audit services to audit clientsthrough a variety of mechanisms. These include the use oftools (e.g., GTAC — see page 14 and Service OfferingReference Tool (SORT) — see below), training and requiredprocedures completed during the performance of audits andinternal inspection processes.

Global independence learning

EY develops and deploys a variety of independence learningprograms. All professionals and certain other personnelare required to participate in annual independence learningto help maintain our independence from the companieswe audit.

The goal is to help our people understand theirresponsibility and to enable each of them, and EY, to befree from interests that might be regarded as beingincompatible with objectivity, integrity and impartialityin serving an audit client.

The annual independence learning program coversindependence requirements focusing on recent changes topolicy, as well as recurring themes and topics of importance.Timely completion of annual independence learning isrequired and is monitored closely.

In addition to the annual learning program, independenceawareness is promoted through a number of events andmaterials, including the new-hire program, milestoneprograms and core service line curricula.

Service Offering Reference Tool

We assess and monitor our portfolio of services on anongoing basis, confirming that they are permitted by law andprofessional standards, and to make sure that we have theright methodologies, procedures and processes in place asnew service offerings are developed. We restrict servicesfrom being provided that could present undue independenceor other risks. Service Offering Reference Tool (SORT)provides our people with information about our serviceofferings. SORT includes guidance around which servicescan be delivered to audit and non-audit clients, as well asindependence and other risk management issues.

Business Relationship Evaluation Tool

The Business Relationship Evaluation Tool (BRET) processhelps to support our business relationships’ compliance withindependence requirements. Our people are required touse BRET in many circumstances to evaluate and obtainadvance approval of potential business relationship with anaudit client.

Audit committees and oversight of independenceWe recognize the important role audit committees andsimilar corporate governance bodies undertake in theoversight of auditor independence. Empowered andindependent audit committees perform a vital role on behalfof shareholders in protecting independence and preventingconflicts of interest. We are committed to robust and regularcommunication with audit committees or those charged withgovernance. Through our quality review programs, wemonitor and test compliance with our standards for auditcommittee communications, as well as the pre-approval ofnon-audit services, where applicable.

Page 20: Transparency Report 2016 - EY - US › ... › EY-gennemsigtighedsrapport-2016.pdf · 2019-09-17 · Transparency Report 201 6 — EY Denmark 3 Message from the Country Managing Partner

Transparency Report 2016 — EY Denmark 20

Continuing education ofaudit professionalsProfessional developmentThe EY career development framework, EYU, provides ourpeople with opportunities for the right experiences, learningand coaching to help them grow and achieve their potential.

The learning component of EYU is based on an extensive andglobally consistent learning curriculum that helps all ourpeople develop the right technical and personal leadershipskills, wherever they are located around the world. Coreaudit training courses are supplemented by learningprograms that are developed in response to changes inaccounting and reporting standards, independence andprofessional standards, and emerging practice issues.

We are redesigning our core audit training into “The AuditAcademy” — a curriculum for learning. This high-impactlearning combines interactive classroom-based simulations,“on-demand” e-learning modules and relevant reinforcementand application support.

Where EY audits and reviews International FinancialReporting Standards (IFRS) financial statements, relevantteam members undertake learning to become IFRSaccredited.

Mandatory supplementary trainingAll state authorised public accountants must, as a minimum,with a three-year period receive 120 hours ofsupplementary training in the core areas that relate to theirwork.

Attaching great importance to ongoing, supplementarytraining for both approved auditors and other employees, EYDenmark offers a broad palette of in-house courses.Furthermore, EY Denmark has adopted procedures tosupervise that each individual professional complies, as aminimum, with the provisions of the Danish Act on ApprovedAuditors and Audit Firms as regards supplementary training,and that course attendance can at all times be documented.

EY has a specific program for employees aiming at passingthe examination to become a state authorised publicaccountant. Every year, state authorised public accountantsand other experienced professionals are offered a palette ofinternational and national courses allowing each individualprofessional and personal development opportunities.

Certification of certain financial auditors

EY's signing auditors for financial institutions, mortgagecredit institutions, insurance companies and providers ofmulti-employer plans have been certified by the Danish FSA.This means that EY professionals servicing financialinstitutions as a minimum render services to financialinstitutions and attend in 50% more supplementary training.

In addition to formal learning, professional developmentoccurs through coaching and experiences our professionalsreceive on the job. Coaching helps to transform knowledgeand experience into practice.

Experienced professionals are expected to coach anddevelop less experienced personnel to create a continuallearning environment. We also manage the assignment ofour people to particular engagements in a systematic waythat helps to ensure they have exposure to a range ofexperiences as part of their own development.

Knowledge and internal communications

Knowledge sharing

Efficient knowledge sharing is important in order for ouremployees to be able to live up to their professionalresponsibility.

Changes to accounting standards, standards on auditing andother professional standards and news of relevance to theindustry are communicated both via global newsletters, acommon Danish portal (Assurance Portalen) and inconnection with EY's ongoing learning programs. Allemployees have access to a number of documents,templates and guidelines via global tools and AssurancePortalen.

Globally as well as nationally, our employees therefore sharea common EY attitude to a number of technical/professionalissues.

In addition to professional development and performancemanagement, we understand the importance of providingclient engagement teams with up-to-date information to helpthem perform their professional responsibilities. EY makessignificant investments in knowledge and communicationnetworks to enable the rapid dissemination of information tohelp people collaborate and share best practices. Examplesinclude:

Page 21: Transparency Report 2016 - EY - US › ... › EY-gennemsigtighedsrapport-2016.pdf · 2019-09-17 · Transparency Report 201 6 — EY Denmark 3 Message from the Country Managing Partner

Transparency Report 2016 — EY Denmark 21

• Global Accounting and Auditing Information Tool(GAAIT), which includes local and internationalaccounting and auditing standards as well asinterpretive guidance

• Assurance Portalen, which is an intranet-based portalincludes templates, standards and models for purposesof most audit and consultancy engagements.

• Publications such as International GAAP, IFRSdevelopments and illustrative financial statements

• Global Accounting and Auditing News, a weekly updatecovering assurance and independence policies,developments from standard setters and regulators aswell as internal commentary thereon

• Point of view and Overviews, which provide importantperspectives on current public policy and regulatorydevelopments

• Practice alerts and webcasts covering a range of globaland country-specific matters designed for continuousimprovement in the member firms’ Assurance practices

Performance managementA comprehensive performance management processrequires our people to set goals, have clear workexpectations, receive feedback and talk about theirperformance. The Performance Management andDevelopment Process (PMDP) is designed to help our peoplegrow and succeed in their careers.

Under the PMDP, periodic job performance reviews arecombined with annual self-appraisal and reviews. As part ofthe annual review process, each professional, in conjunctionwith his or her counselor (an assigned, more experiencedprofessional), identifies opportunities for furtherdevelopment. Professionals and their counselors are guidedby a set of expectations that articulate the knowledge, skillsand behaviors that should be maintained and developed fortheir respective ranks. These expectations are derived from,and align with, EY’s global strategy and values.

Page 22: Transparency Report 2016 - EY - US › ... › EY-gennemsigtighedsrapport-2016.pdf · 2019-09-17 · Transparency Report 201 6 — EY Denmark 3 Message from the Country Managing Partner

Transparency Report 2016 — EY Denmark 22

Revenue andremunerationFinancial informationThe financial information presented below for EY Denmarkrepresents, revenues and includes expenses billed to clientsand revenues related to billings to other EYG member firms.Also, revenue amounts disclosed in this report includerevenues from both audit and non-audit clients.

Revenue is presented in accordance with section 27(1)(8) ofthe Danish Auditors Act. ”Other assurance services” revenueincludes accounting and financing services; certain duediligence services; and risk-related services includinginternal controls, internal audits, technology and security;Sarbanes-Oxley (SOX) compliance; actuarial; fraud andforensics; and other attestation services. ”Other non-auditservices” revenue includes transaction, valuation,performance improvement, restructuring and otheradvisory-related services.

Financial information for the period ended 30 June 2016expressed in millions of DKK, consolidated

Service Revenue (m) Percent

Audit services 693 42%

Other assurance services 83 5%

Tax advisory 396 24%

Other non-audit services 483 29%

Total 1,655 100%

Prior-year performanceOn 1 July 2014 EY in Denmark and the former KPMGDenmark merged and the former KPMG Denmark changedits name to Ernst & Young Godkendt Revisionspartnerselskab(CVR no. 30 70 02 28).

Because of the merger the 2014/2015 Transparency Reportcovers 18 month from 1 January 2014 – 30 June 2015. Seeproforma comparative figures for the financial year2014/2015 below.

Financial information for the period ended 30 June 2015expressed in millions of DKK, consolidated

Service Revenue (m)(12 month)

Percent

Audit services 715 42%

Other assurance services 77 5%

Tax advisory 406 24%

Other non-audit services 490 29%

Total 1,688 100%

Page 23: Transparency Report 2016 - EY - US › ... › EY-gennemsigtighedsrapport-2016.pdf · 2019-09-17 · Transparency Report 201 6 — EY Denmark 3 Message from the Country Managing Partner

Transparency Report 2016 — EY Denmark 23

Partner remunerationQuality is at the center of EY’s business strategy and a keycomponent of our performance management systems. EYDenmark partners and other professionals are evaluated andcompensated based on criteria that include specific qualityand risk management indicators, covering both actionsand results.

Global performance management processes cover partnersin EYG member firms around the world. They reinforce theglobal business agenda by linking performance to widergoals and values. These ongoing, cyclical processes includegoal setting, personal development planning andperformance review, and are tied to partners’ recognitionand reward. It is the cornerstone of the evaluation process todocument partners’ goals and performance. A partner’sgoals are required to reflect various global priorities, one ofwhich is quality.

EY prohibits evaluating and compensating lead auditengagement partners and other key audit partners on anengagement based on the sale of non-Assurance services totheir audit clients. This reinforces to our partners theirprofessional obligation to maintain our independence andobjectivity.

Specific quality and risk performance measures have beendeveloped to account for:

• Technical excellence• Living the EY values as demonstrated by behaviors and

attitude• Demonstrating knowledge of, and leadership in, quality

and risk management• Compliance with policies and procedures• Compliance with laws, regulations and professional

duties• Contributing to protecting and enhancing the EY brandThe EY partner compensation philosophy calls formeaningfully differentiated rewards based on a partner’slevel of performance, as measured by the Global PartnerPerformance Management (GPPM) process, which is aglobally consistent evaluation process for all partners in EYGmember firms around the world. Partners are assessedannually on their performance in delivering quality,exceptional client service and people engagement alongsideour financial and market metrics.

We operate under a system that requires quality tobe a significant consideration in a partner’s overallyear-end rating.

To recognize different market values for different skills androles, and to attract and retain high-performing individuals,the following factors are also considered when calculatingtotal reward:

• Experience• Role and responsibility• Long-term potential• MobilityInstances of noncompliance with quality standards result inremedial actions, which may include compensationadjustment, additional training, additional supervision orreassignment. A pattern of noncompliance or particularlyserious noncompliance may result in actions that includeseparation from EY Denmark.

Page 24: Transparency Report 2016 - EY - US › ... › EY-gennemsigtighedsrapport-2016.pdf · 2019-09-17 · Transparency Report 201 6 — EY Denmark 3 Message from the Country Managing Partner

Transparency Report 2016 — EY Denmark 24

Declaration on quality control system and independencepolicyThe Danish Act on Approved Auditors and Audit Firms prescribes that audit firms must, as part of the quality control system, laydown guidelines that ensure that, prior to undertaking any assurance engagements in accordance with section 1(2) of the Act, theauditor assesses whether there are any circumstances that may raise doubt in a well-informed third party about the auditor’sindependence. Moreover, the Act prescribes that the audit firm must ensure that, in their working papers in connection with theperformance of the engagements, the auditors document all significant threats to the auditor’s and the audit firm’s independenceand the safeguards that have been applied to mitigate these threats.

We are ultimately responsible for the quality control system and for ensuring that guidelines have been established to assessindependence and that the auditors comply with the rules on documentation evidencing significant threats to the auditor's andthe audit firm's independence and the safeguards that have been applied to mitigate these threats.

We have evaluated the Company's quality control system, including the underlying controls and procedures. An efficient qualitycontrol system is no guarantee and cannot eliminate the risk that reports issued on financial statements and other reporting tothe public are materially misstated, but the quality control system provides reasonable assurance that reports issued give a trueand fair view.

In our opinion, the quality control system is efficient, and the independence policy is complied with.

Copenhagen, 30 September 2016

Jesper Koefoed Anders Stig LauritsenCEO, Country Managing Partner Assurance, Big Cities

Peter Klint Eilertsen Per GunslevAssurance, Local Regions Professional Practice Director

Page 25: Transparency Report 2016 - EY - US › ... › EY-gennemsigtighedsrapport-2016.pdf · 2019-09-17 · Transparency Report 201 6 — EY Denmark 3 Message from the Country Managing Partner

Transparency Report 2016 — EY Denmark 25

AppendixEY Denmark public interest entity audit clients

In the financial year that ended on 30 June 2016, EY Denmark performed audits of the following public interest entities:

Audit and assurance clients subject to section 21(3) of the Danish Act on ApprovedAuditors and Audit FirmsListed companies (companies with shares, bonds, etc. admitted to trading on a stock exchange in anEU member state, etc.)

Aktieselskabet Schouw & Co

Arkil Holding A/S

Bang & Olufsen a/s

Brdr. A&O Johansen A/S

Dalhoff Larsen & Horneman A/S

Dantherm A/S

DFDS A/S

Djurslands Bank A/S

DSV A/S

Egetæpper A/S

F.E. Bording A/S

Fast Ejendom Danmark A/S

FirstFarms A/S

Fynske Bank A/S

Glunz & Jensen A/S

GN Store Nord A/S

Greentech Energy Systems A/S

Højgaard Holding a/s

Investeringsforeningen Alm. Brand Invest

Investeringsforeningen Danske Invest

Investeringsforeningen Danske Invest Select

Investeringsforeningen Fundamental Invest

Investeringsforeningen Gudme Raaschou

Investeringsforeningen Halberg-Gundersen Invest

Investeringsforeningen Handelsinvest

Investeringsforeningen Lån & Spar Invest

Investeringsforeningen Maj Invest

Investeringsforeningen SmallCap Danmark

Investeringsforeningen Sparinvest

Investeringsforeningen Stockrate Invest

ISS A/S

ISS Global A/S

J. Lauritzen A/S

Kapitalforeningen Lån & Spar MixInvest

KommuneKredit

Matas A/S

Monberg & Thorsen A/S

Napatech A/S

NewCap Holding A/S

Pandora A/S

Royal Unibrew A/S

Sanistål A/S

Santa Fe Group A/S

Scandinavian Brake Systems A/S

Small Cap Danmark A/S

SP Group A/S

Spar Nord Bank A/S

Strategic Investment A/S

Svejsemaskinefabrikken Migatronic A/S

Sydbank A/S

Victor International A/S

Viking Supply Ships A/S

Aalborg Boldspilklub A/S

Page 26: Transparency Report 2016 - EY - US › ... › EY-gennemsigtighedsrapport-2016.pdf · 2019-09-17 · Transparency Report 201 6 — EY Denmark 3 Message from the Country Managing Partner

Transparency Report 2016 — EY Denmark 26

Non-listed financial companies, etc. that are subject to supervision by the Danish Financial SupervisoryAuthority, except for companies that are subject to the Danish Insurance Mediation Act and companiesthat are subject to Part 20 a (investment advisers) of the Danish Financial Business Act (includingfinancial state-owned companies)

Andelskassen Fælleskassen

Andelskassen J.A.K. Slagelse

Borealis Insurance A/S

Capital Four Aifm A/S

Capital Four Holding A/S

Capital Four Management Fondsmæglerselskab A/S

D.S. Forsikring A/S

Danica Pension, Livsforsikringsaktieselskab

Danmarks Nationalbanks Pensionskasse under afvikling

Danske Civil- og Akademiingeniørers Pensionskasse

Danske Privatbaners Forsikringsforening G/S

DSV Insurance A/S

Finansiel Stabilitet A/S

Fondsmæglerselskabet Maj Invest A/S

Forsikringsselskabet TRAFIK, gensidigt

Forsikringsselskabet Vejle Brand af 1841 G/S

Frørup Andelskasse

GF-Forsikring A/S

Global Evolution Fondsmæglerselskab A/S

HP Fondsmæglerselskab A/S

Investeringsforeningen Lægernes Pensionsinvestering

Investeringsforngsforeningen ProCaptures

Investeringforeningen Profil Invest

Juristernes og Økonomernes Pensionskasse

Kalmar Structured Finance A/S

Københavns Andelskasse

Landbrugets Finansieringsbank A/S

Leasing Fyn Bank A/S

Lind Capital Fondsmæglerselskab A/S

Lægernes Pensionsbank A/S

Lægernes Pensionskasse

Lønmodtagernes Dyrtidsfond

Maj Bank A/S

Maj Invest Equity A/S

Maj Invest Holding A/S

Mermaid Asset Management Fondsmæglerselskab A/S

NASDAQ OMX Copenhagen A/S

Pensionskassen for Børne- og Ungdomspædagoger

Pensionskassen For Farmakonomer

Popermo Forsikring g/s

Quenti Asset Management A/S

Rønde Sparekasse

SAS Pilot & Navigatør Pensionskasse

Saxo Bank A/S

Saxo Privatbank A/S

Stadil Sparekasse

Sygeforsikringen Danmark

Søby-Skader-Halling Sparekasse

Sønderjysk Forsikring G/S

Ulfborg Hind Herreds Brandassuranceselskab for Løsøre,Gensidig

Municipalities, local authority companies and regions

Esbjerg Kommune

Frederiksberg Kommune

Frederikssund-Halsnæs Brand & Redningsberedskab

Fælles Kommunale Redningsberedskab Lolland-FalsterBrandvæsen

Gladsaxe Kommune

Hans Christian Andersen Airport s.m.b.a.

Herning Kommune

Høje-Taastrup Kommune

Kalundborg Kommune

Karup Lufthavn A.M.B.A.

Lolland Kommune

Middelfart Kommune

Midttrafik

Odense Kommune

Region Midtjylland

Page 27: Transparency Report 2016 - EY - US › ... › EY-gennemsigtighedsrapport-2016.pdf · 2019-09-17 · Transparency Report 201 6 — EY Denmark 3 Message from the Country Managing Partner

Transparency Report 2016 — EY Denmark 27

Municipalities, local authority companies and regions

Slagelse Kommune

Solrød Kommune

Sydtrafik

Tarup Davinde I/S

Trafikselskabet Movia

Vestfyns Affalds- og Deponeringsanlæg I/S

Vordingborg Kommune

Aabenraa Kommune

Aarhus Letbane I/S

State-owned companies (excl. listed and financial)DSB

Eksport Kredit Finansiering A/S

Statens Ejendomssalg A/S (Freja Ejendomme)

Statens og Kommunernes Indkøbsservice A/S

Other section 21(3) companies (companies (groups) that exceed two or more of the following criteriafor two successive years: a) a staff of more than 2,500 individuals; b) a balance sheet total of DKK 5billion; c) revenue of DKK 5 billion)

Aktieselskabet af 1.8.2004

Aktieselskabet af 1.8.2007

Angel Acquisition ApS

Anpartsselskabet af 1. oktober 2011

ARLA Foods a.m.b.a.

Arla Foods Holding A/S

Bestseller A/S

Bestseller United A/S

Dansk Supermarked A/S

DH Denmark Holding ApS

DHCDAN Holding ApS

DSV Road Holding A/S

DSV Air & Sea Holding A/S

DSV Solutions Holding A/S

Ecco Holding A/S

Ecco Sko A/S

Egmont Fonden

Egmont International Holding A/S

ISS World Services A/S

Købmand Herman Sallings Fond

Lauritzen Fonden

LF Investment ApS

MT Højgaard A/S

Raven Acquisition ApS

Siemens Wind Power A/S

Telenor A/S

Telenor Danmark Holding A/S

VELUX A/S

VKR Holding A/S

Page 28: Transparency Report 2016 - EY - US › ... › EY-gennemsigtighedsrapport-2016.pdf · 2019-09-17 · Transparency Report 201 6 — EY Denmark 3 Message from the Country Managing Partner

EY | Assurance | Tax | Transactions | Advisory

About EYEY is a global leader in assurance, tax, transaction andadvisory services. The insights and quality services we deliverhelp build trust and confidence in the capital markets and ineconomies the world over. We develop outstanding leaderswho team to deliver on our promises to all of ourstakeholders. In so doing, we play a critical role in building abetter working world for our people, for our clients and forour communities.

EY refers to the global organization, and may refer to one ormore, of the member firms of Ernst & Young Global Limited,each of which is a separate legal entity. Ernst & Young GlobalLimited, a UK company limited by guarantee, does notprovide services to clients. For more information about ourorganization, please visit ey.com.

© 2016All Rights Reserved.

BMC AgencyGA 0000_06701

ED None

This material has been prepared for general informational purposes only and isnot intended to be relied upon as accounting, tax, or other professional advice.Please refer to your advisors for specific advice.

ey.com