Transforming Government Content: How We Cut 90,000 Pages of Government Content, Rewrote the...

67
Transforming Government Content Padma Gillen, Scroll LLP

Transcript of Transforming Government Content: How We Cut 90,000 Pages of Government Content, Rewrote the...

Page 1: Transforming Government Content: How We Cut 90,000 Pages of Government Content, Rewrote the Remaining 30,000, and Still Met User Needs

Transforming Government Content

Padma Gillen, Scroll LLP

Page 2: Transforming Government Content: How We Cut 90,000 Pages of Government Content, Rewrote the Remaining 30,000, and Still Met User Needs

@ScrollUK

Hello!

Page 3: Transforming Government Content: How We Cut 90,000 Pages of Government Content, Rewrote the Remaining 30,000, and Still Met User Needs

@ScrollUK

Overview

1. A story

2. Organising content teams

3. Agile

1. Kanban and scrum

2. The sprint

4. Workflow

Page 4: Transforming Government Content: How We Cut 90,000 Pages of Government Content, Rewrote the Remaining 30,000, and Still Met User Needs

@ScrollUK@ScrollUK

A story about… 1The Smarter Guidance project

Page 5: Transforming Government Content: How We Cut 90,000 Pages of Government Content, Rewrote the Remaining 30,000, and Still Met User Needs

@ScrollUK

Smarter Guidance was about increasing the quality

and reducing the quantity of Defra guidance.

Page 6: Transforming Government Content: How We Cut 90,000 Pages of Government Content, Rewrote the Remaining 30,000, and Still Met User Needs

@ScrollUK

We started with 120,000 pages.

We’ve reduced that by 80%. So far.

Page 7: Transforming Government Content: How We Cut 90,000 Pages of Government Content, Rewrote the Remaining 30,000, and Still Met User Needs

@ScrollUK

We achieved this by designing content around user needs.

Page 8: Transforming Government Content: How We Cut 90,000 Pages of Government Content, Rewrote the Remaining 30,000, and Still Met User Needs

@ScrollUK

As a…

I want to…

So I can…

User stories

UK passport holder

renew my passport

leave the country

Page 9: Transforming Government Content: How We Cut 90,000 Pages of Government Content, Rewrote the Remaining 30,000, and Still Met User Needs

@ScrollUK

We required acceptance criteria and source content

before starting work on an item.

Page 10: Transforming Government Content: How We Cut 90,000 Pages of Government Content, Rewrote the Remaining 30,000, and Still Met User Needs

@ScrollUK

Workflow

For a quality product, every stage is important:

• Check we have what we need

• Draft

• 2i

• Fact check

• Fact check amends

• 2i

• Final approval

• Published

Page 11: Transforming Government Content: How We Cut 90,000 Pages of Government Content, Rewrote the Remaining 30,000, and Still Met User Needs

@ScrollUK

What does quality mean?

It’s quality content if it meets your needs as a user. That means:

• you can find it

• you can understand it

• it’s factually accurate

• it’s complete

• it’s consistent with the rest of the site

• you can act on it

Page 12: Transforming Government Content: How We Cut 90,000 Pages of Government Content, Rewrote the Remaining 30,000, and Still Met User Needs

@ScrollUK

For a while, neither quality nor pace was good enough.

Page 13: Transforming Government Content: How We Cut 90,000 Pages of Government Content, Rewrote the Remaining 30,000, and Still Met User Needs

@ScrollUK

So, we iterated.

Page 14: Transforming Government Content: How We Cut 90,000 Pages of Government Content, Rewrote the Remaining 30,000, and Still Met User Needs

@ScrollUK

We tweaked the 2i process, started crits and set up fire teams.

Page 15: Transforming Government Content: How We Cut 90,000 Pages of Government Content, Rewrote the Remaining 30,000, and Still Met User Needs

@ScrollUK

We had a 2i meeting every week at first to ensure consistency and as a forum for

questions.

Page 16: Transforming Government Content: How We Cut 90,000 Pages of Government Content, Rewrote the Remaining 30,000, and Still Met User Needs

@ScrollUK

We had a content design masterclass every week to raise the standard of

everyone in the team.

Page 17: Transforming Government Content: How We Cut 90,000 Pages of Government Content, Rewrote the Remaining 30,000, and Still Met User Needs

@ScrollUK

My goal was that everyone on the team would eventually be 2i.

Ideally, 2i should be peer review.

Page 18: Transforming Government Content: How We Cut 90,000 Pages of Government Content, Rewrote the Remaining 30,000, and Still Met User Needs

@ScrollUK

We had to figure out how to approach highly technical content in plain English.

Page 19: Transforming Government Content: How We Cut 90,000 Pages of Government Content, Rewrote the Remaining 30,000, and Still Met User Needs

@ScrollUK

We found that 2i for specialist content is pretty much the same as 2i for

mainstream.

Page 20: Transforming Government Content: How We Cut 90,000 Pages of Government Content, Rewrote the Remaining 30,000, and Still Met User Needs

@ScrollUK

Things we’re looking for in 2i

• Is it in proposition? • Does it work with what’s already on the site (or

planned)? • Does the structure make sense from a user

perspective? • Does the analytics and other data back up the user

need, use of language and approach? • Is it in plain English? • Is it in style? • Is the tone of voice right? • Did the content designer take account of all fact

check comments - or give clear reasons why not?

Page 21: Transforming Government Content: How We Cut 90,000 Pages of Government Content, Rewrote the Remaining 30,000, and Still Met User Needs

@ScrollUK

2i is a training opportunity - give clear, constructive

feedback that the content designer can learn from.

Page 22: Transforming Government Content: How We Cut 90,000 Pages of Government Content, Rewrote the Remaining 30,000, and Still Met User Needs

@ScrollUK

If you pull all that together for your team, you’ll have the skills

and process required to produce quality content.

Consistently.

Page 23: Transforming Government Content: How We Cut 90,000 Pages of Government Content, Rewrote the Remaining 30,000, and Still Met User Needs

@ScrollUK

The quantity of work, resistance from SMEs, and the firm deadline meant we

sometimes had to compromise on quality.

No one loved that.

Page 24: Transforming Government Content: How We Cut 90,000 Pages of Government Content, Rewrote the Remaining 30,000, and Still Met User Needs

@ScrollUK

We published MVP and started a content debt spreadsheet so we can

go back and iterate.

Page 25: Transforming Government Content: How We Cut 90,000 Pages of Government Content, Rewrote the Remaining 30,000, and Still Met User Needs

@ScrollUK

We hit the target. Then we organised things to make it

sustainable.

Page 26: Transforming Government Content: How We Cut 90,000 Pages of Government Content, Rewrote the Remaining 30,000, and Still Met User Needs

@ScrollUK@ScrollUK

Organising content teams2

Page 27: Transforming Government Content: How We Cut 90,000 Pages of Government Content, Rewrote the Remaining 30,000, and Still Met User Needs

@ScrollUK

Organise for maximum quality.

Design speed into the process.

Page 28: Transforming Government Content: How We Cut 90,000 Pages of Government Content, Rewrote the Remaining 30,000, and Still Met User Needs

@ScrollUK

Options

1. Central team

2. Distributed team

3. Hub and spoke

4. Matrix

Page 29: Transforming Government Content: How We Cut 90,000 Pages of Government Content, Rewrote the Remaining 30,000, and Still Met User Needs

@ScrollUK

Central team

Pros

1. Easy to manage

2. Team communicates easily

3. Spot issues quickly

4. Strong team identity

5. Learns quickly

Cons

1. Doesn’t scale well

2. Can be seen as authoritarian

3. Can be remote from the user

Page 30: Transforming Government Content: How We Cut 90,000 Pages of Government Content, Rewrote the Remaining 30,000, and Still Met User Needs

@ScrollUK

Distributed team

Pros

1. Flexible

2. Closer to users

Cons

1. Communication

2. Creating a culture

3. Sharing learning across team

4. Spotting issues before they become big problems

Page 31: Transforming Government Content: How We Cut 90,000 Pages of Government Content, Rewrote the Remaining 30,000, and Still Met User Needs

@ScrollUK

Hub and spoke

Pros

1. It scales

2. You can still: - create a culture- share learning- spot issues (as long as you have the right structure and governance in place)

Cons

1. Success depends on how you organise it

Page 32: Transforming Government Content: How We Cut 90,000 Pages of Government Content, Rewrote the Remaining 30,000, and Still Met User Needs

@ScrollUK

Matrix

Pros

1. Designed for large scale

2. Allows communities of practice

3. Breaks down silos and can build content design awareness across the organisation

Cons

1. You can end up being responsible for things you have no control over

2. Can lead to confusion and resentment

Page 33: Transforming Government Content: How We Cut 90,000 Pages of Government Content, Rewrote the Remaining 30,000, and Still Met User Needs

@ScrollUK

We went with hub and spoke.

Page 34: Transforming Government Content: How We Cut 90,000 Pages of Government Content, Rewrote the Remaining 30,000, and Still Met User Needs

@ScrollUK

For many situations though, matrix has real potential.

Page 35: Transforming Government Content: How We Cut 90,000 Pages of Government Content, Rewrote the Remaining 30,000, and Still Met User Needs

@ScrollUK

For hub and spoke to work, you need a clear hierarchy.

Page 36: Transforming Government Content: How We Cut 90,000 Pages of Government Content, Rewrote the Remaining 30,000, and Still Met User Needs

@ScrollUK

Page 37: Transforming Government Content: How We Cut 90,000 Pages of Government Content, Rewrote the Remaining 30,000, and Still Met User Needs

@ScrollUK

Organise larger teams into several ‘fire teams’.

Page 38: Transforming Government Content: How We Cut 90,000 Pages of Government Content, Rewrote the Remaining 30,000, and Still Met User Needs

@ScrollUK@ScrollUK

Workflow3

Page 39: Transforming Government Content: How We Cut 90,000 Pages of Government Content, Rewrote the Remaining 30,000, and Still Met User Needs

@ScrollUK

From request to icebox

Content designers ask:

• is there a user need?

• how do you know it's a user need? (any data?)

• is it in proposition?

• is it already met on GOV.UK?

• is it already met elsewhere?

• are there clear acceptance criteria?

• is there clear source material to work from? (or an SME who can explain?)

OK, we'll do something…

Page 40: Transforming Government Content: How We Cut 90,000 Pages of Government Content, Rewrote the Remaining 30,000, and Still Met User Needs

@ScrollUK

From backlog to done

Ideally this:

• Backlog

• Draft

• 2i

• Fact check

• Fact check amends

• 2i

• Published

Page 41: Transforming Government Content: How We Cut 90,000 Pages of Government Content, Rewrote the Remaining 30,000, and Still Met User Needs

@ScrollUK

From backlog to done

But could be more like this:

• Backlog

• Draft

• 2i

• Amends

• 2i

• Fact check

• Fact check amends

• Breathe!

• 2i

• Amends

• 2i

• 2nd factcheck

• 2nd factcheck amends

• 2i

• Amends

• 2i

• Published!

Page 42: Transforming Government Content: How We Cut 90,000 Pages of Government Content, Rewrote the Remaining 30,000, and Still Met User Needs

@ScrollUK@ScrollUK

Agile4

Page 43: Transforming Government Content: How We Cut 90,000 Pages of Government Content, Rewrote the Remaining 30,000, and Still Met User Needs

@ScrollUK

Source: GDS Service Design Manual

Page 44: Transforming Government Content: How We Cut 90,000 Pages of Government Content, Rewrote the Remaining 30,000, and Still Met User Needs

@ScrollUK

How to do it

1. Get a rough idea. (Discovery)

2. Build a minimal version and try it out. (Alpha)

3. Mess around with it lots based on user feedback and behaviour. (Still alpha)

4. Get it roughly right based on what you’ve learned. (Beta)

5. Still listen to feedback and tweak as necessary (Still beta)

6. When you’re happy it’s all working well, consider it ‘finished’. (Live)

7. (But keep iterating.)

Page 45: Transforming Government Content: How We Cut 90,000 Pages of Government Content, Rewrote the Remaining 30,000, and Still Met User Needs

@ScrollUK

Source: http://agilemanifesto.org/

Page 46: Transforming Government Content: How We Cut 90,000 Pages of Government Content, Rewrote the Remaining 30,000, and Still Met User Needs

@ScrollUK

Agile works well for digital because things change lots

Page 47: Transforming Government Content: How We Cut 90,000 Pages of Government Content, Rewrote the Remaining 30,000, and Still Met User Needs

@ScrollUK

Page 48: Transforming Government Content: How We Cut 90,000 Pages of Government Content, Rewrote the Remaining 30,000, and Still Met User Needs

@ScrollUK@ScrollUK

Kanban and Scrum3.1

Different ways to run agile projects

Page 49: Transforming Government Content: How We Cut 90,000 Pages of Government Content, Rewrote the Remaining 30,000, and Still Met User Needs

@ScrollUK

Kanban

Page 50: Transforming Government Content: How We Cut 90,000 Pages of Government Content, Rewrote the Remaining 30,000, and Still Met User Needs

@ScrollUK

Page 51: Transforming Government Content: How We Cut 90,000 Pages of Government Content, Rewrote the Remaining 30,000, and Still Met User Needs

@ScrollUK

Page 52: Transforming Government Content: How We Cut 90,000 Pages of Government Content, Rewrote the Remaining 30,000, and Still Met User Needs

@ScrollUK

Scrum

Page 53: Transforming Government Content: How We Cut 90,000 Pages of Government Content, Rewrote the Remaining 30,000, and Still Met User Needs

@ScrollUK

Scrum divides work into sprints.

Page 54: Transforming Government Content: How We Cut 90,000 Pages of Government Content, Rewrote the Remaining 30,000, and Still Met User Needs

@ScrollUK

The team agrees to deliver a certain amount of work

each sprint.

Page 55: Transforming Government Content: How We Cut 90,000 Pages of Government Content, Rewrote the Remaining 30,000, and Still Met User Needs

@ScrollUK

Scrum rituals

Sprint planning

Daily stand-up

Show and tell

Retrospective

Page 56: Transforming Government Content: How We Cut 90,000 Pages of Government Content, Rewrote the Remaining 30,000, and Still Met User Needs

@ScrollUK

Content team

Each scrum team needs:

• product owner

• scrum master

• developers

This translates as:

• content lead

• content delivery manager

• content designers

Page 57: Transforming Government Content: How We Cut 90,000 Pages of Government Content, Rewrote the Remaining 30,000, and Still Met User Needs

@ScrollUK@ScrollUK

The sprint3.2

Page 58: Transforming Government Content: How We Cut 90,000 Pages of Government Content, Rewrote the Remaining 30,000, and Still Met User Needs

@ScrollUK

Sprint planning

1. Look at the top tickets (tasks) in the icebox (should be highest priority).

2. Size the items (S, M, L, XL or 1,2,3,5,8).

3. See what’s not been completed from last sprint.

4. Look at the velocity of the team (how much you can realistically get through).

5. Put enough stuff from the icebox into the backlog for a sprint.

6. Assign them to content designers, or let content designers pick items when ready.

Page 59: Transforming Government Content: How We Cut 90,000 Pages of Government Content, Rewrote the Remaining 30,000, and Still Met User Needs

@ScrollUK

Daily stand-up

Page 60: Transforming Government Content: How We Cut 90,000 Pages of Government Content, Rewrote the Remaining 30,000, and Still Met User Needs

@ScrollUK

Or ‘Slack-up’

Page 61: Transforming Government Content: How We Cut 90,000 Pages of Government Content, Rewrote the Remaining 30,000, and Still Met User Needs

@ScrollUK

Show and tell

Page 62: Transforming Government Content: How We Cut 90,000 Pages of Government Content, Rewrote the Remaining 30,000, and Still Met User Needs

@ScrollUK

(And do regular crits too.)

Page 63: Transforming Government Content: How We Cut 90,000 Pages of Government Content, Rewrote the Remaining 30,000, and Still Met User Needs

@ScrollUK

Retrospective

Page 64: Transforming Government Content: How We Cut 90,000 Pages of Government Content, Rewrote the Remaining 30,000, and Still Met User Needs

@ScrollUK

Big retrospective

Page 65: Transforming Government Content: How We Cut 90,000 Pages of Government Content, Rewrote the Remaining 30,000, and Still Met User Needs

@ScrollUK

Burndown chart

Page 66: Transforming Government Content: How We Cut 90,000 Pages of Government Content, Rewrote the Remaining 30,000, and Still Met User Needs

@ScrollUK

Thank you!

Page 67: Transforming Government Content: How We Cut 90,000 Pages of Government Content, Rewrote the Remaining 30,000, and Still Met User Needs

Scroll provides training in digital content skills through the Digital Content Academy.

Find out more at:

www.digitalcontent.academy www.scroll.co.uk

SCROLL

© Copyright 2016 Scroll LLP