Ceramic Evidence for Political Transformations in Early Mamluk Egypt
Transformations of the State -- Monopolist to Political Authority Manager
-
Upload
manish-parashar -
Category
Government & Nonprofit
-
view
74 -
download
2
description
Transcript of Transformations of the State -- Monopolist to Political Authority Manager
TRANSFORMATIONS OF
THE STATE – FROM
MONOPOLIST TO MANAGER
OF POLITICAL AUTHORITY
Presented by Manish Parashar
A State is defined as an organization specialized in exercising political authority within a given territory and over the people in that territory.
Decision-making competence, organizational competence and legitimatory power
The State
Instrumental nationalization: extending from political, social, economic to cultural factors
Examples: separation of Church & State, welfare programs; education, regulatory market, arts & public museums, etc.
Nationalization of the State
Legitamatory Nationalization: Establishment of Rule of Law, Democracy
Spurred by the Bill of Rights in England; American & French Revolutions
Rule of Law is to an independent Judiciary whereas Democracy is to universal suffrage, equal opportunities to all citizens
STATE
CITIZENS
Constitutionalization of the State
Rise of non-state actors in OECD countries c. 1970
International actors (UNO, EU), Private actors (Federations, guilds), Transnational actors (NGO, Red Cross, IOC)
Denationalization of the State
Decision-making Organizational
Competence Competence
International Actors Increasing Decreasing
Private Actors Decreasing Increasing
Transnational Actors Increasing Increasing
UNO, ICC, WTO, EU (decision-making autonomy)
World Bank, IMF, NATO; organizational incompetence (in OECD countries)
Internationalization
Public utilities; airlines, banks, gas, electricity, private security agencies, insurance & banking system (organizational competence)
Great Britain (state regulation on capital markets), Germany (insurance regulation), Netherlands (exclusion of corporates from socio-political decision making)
Privatization
Decision-making: ISO, S&P’s, Moody’s credit ratings, International sports rules
Organizational: IOA’s Olympic Games, Gates Foundation, Doctors without Borders
Transnationalization
Democratic Principles Rule of Law Principles
International Actors Partially Increasing Partially Increasing
Private Actors Decreasing Decreasing
Transnational Actors Partially Increasing Partially Increasing
Legitamatory Powers
Democratic principles: only through State diplomatic exchanges; European Parliament, civil society groups on the say of landmines, climate change are exceptions
Rule of Law: citizens can’t address grievances to WTO, anti-whaling, etc,; arbitration in international trade, ECHR & UNHCR are exceptions
Internationalization
Democratic principles: increasing public involvement in deciding codes of conduct; however, decision-making process still centralized
Rule of Law: judicial bodies (ICAS) have increased; however, individual participation & awareness remain weak
Transnationalization
Democratic principles: citizens being replaced with ‘clients’; commodification
Rule of Law: no internal judicial review, market competition reduces legitimacy of elections
Privatization
Organizational: all directives of WTO, EU, UNO, etc. have to be implemented by the member states
Decision-making: to Private players, regulatory frameworks in order to prevent monopolization of market
Complementary role of the State
International actors: State acts as intermediary; can be held accountable for its actions
Transnational actors: State’s representatives in NGO’s
Private actors: State provides judicial remedies, market regulations for privatization
Legitamatory Complementarity
Ultimate manager of political authority: even as more & more functions are drawn away from the State, it is being held responsible for all of its actions
Against a complimentary State role, a general perception is that of States holding an ultimate responsibility
Dangers of “ultimate” State control: Soviet Communism, German National Socialism, World Wars
Manager of Political Authority
Can there be a reversal of Denationalization of the State’s political authority?
Is legitamatory deficiency of Private actors a concern? If so, how can they be brought about?
Discussion questions