Transformation - Air Force Associationsecure.afa.org/media/scripts/grant.pdf · 2003. 5. 22. ·...
Transcript of Transformation - Air Force Associationsecure.afa.org/media/scripts/grant.pdf · 2003. 5. 22. ·...
-
Transformationand the Joint Air Component
Transformationand the Joint Air Component
-
Airpower Transformed WarfareAirpower Transformed Warfare
-
For the 21st Century…For the 21st Century…• QDR 2001 “…the
evolution of combat capabilities that provide revolutionary or asymmetric advantages to our forces.” –
• “The challenges the nation faces do not loom in the distant future, but are here now.”
• “President Bush: “…our security will require transforming the military…”
-
New technologies often go into combat
on fighters first
Fighter Transformation?Fighter Transformation?• Fighters have a track record of
transformation• Fighters remain necessary for
current and future missions– To protect joint forces in the air, on
the ground and at sea– To strike targets with precision and
persistence– To work with bombers, UAVs, etc.
• To fight together with allies • To ensure a force structure big
enough to meet challenges around the globe and at home
• To adapt to new roles
-
The Importance of Being FlexibleThe Importance of Being FlexibleFlexVJ-MUPC3ElecIADSIndusLeadersLOCsPOL
43%43%
Allied Force aim points, 1999
Allied Force aim points, 1999
Serb Army Tank
-
USAF Combat Controller with Northern Alliance
Enduring Freedom, 2001-2:80%+ “Flex” TargetsEnduring Freedom, 2001-2:80%+ “Flex” Targets
The Importance of Being Flexible
83%83%
-
F/A-18EF F/A-18EF
548548
UCAVUCAV????
F-35F-35 ~3000~3000
20082008
20102010
20052005
F-22F-22333333
20002000
• DPG asks: “What is the best investment balance to assure US dominance in strike and air superiority?”
Joint Airpower TransformationJoint Airpower Transformation
-
1997 Matrix: Old Strategy1997 Matrix: Old Strategy• Fighter modernization for
joint air component is circa 1997
• Predates September 11 and Operation Enduring Freedom and Operation Noble Eagle
• Platform-focused• Hedges new operational
concepts with traditional degree of service mission overlap
– Unique capabilities embedded
Inventory Reduction
Major Theater Wars
Platforms Service Roles and Missions
-
A New MatrixA New Matrix1-4-2-11-4-2-1
Near-TermThreats
Homeland Security +
Expeditionary Operations
BattlespaceFusion
Joint and Coalition
Operations
• Deals with threats emerging now
• Prioritizes both homeland security and expeditionary operations
• Evaluates most stressing case for each
• Rates platforms for their ability to advance information dominance
• Assumes joint and coalition operations
– Seamless air component
-
Transforming Air Dominance
Transforming Air Dominance
-
Transformation RequirementsTransformation Requirements
Transformation requires a joint strategy to:• Increase survivability• Create a shared battlespace network• Streamline the force and make it more
supportable• Pioneer new operational concepts – from
time-critical targeting to the merger of sensors and shooters
• Meet needs of homeland security andexpeditionary operations
• DPG asks: “What is the best investment balance to assure US dominance in strike and air superiority?”
• DPG asks: “What is the best investment balance to assure US dominance in strike and air superiority?”
-
F-22 and the Joint Air ComponentF-22 and the Joint Air Component• Fight and win the joint
campaign• Provide critical new
capabilities for homeland security
• Assure access in heavily defended expeditionary
operations• Build the path to a
survivable network for battlespace fusion
integrating sensors and shooters
-
AmmoTargetsAmmoTargets
EW/GCI Targets
EW/GCI Targets
POLTargets
POLTargets
Campaign Against key targets…With F-15sCampaign Against key targets…With F-15s
• 30-Day MRC • SWA 2010 Scenario• Thunder Model• Joint Forces
• 30-Day MRC • SWA 2010 Scenario• Thunder Model• Joint Forces
Total Interdiction
Targets
Total Interdiction
Targets
-
82%more82%more
AmmoTargetsAmmoTargets
EW/GCI Targets
EW/GCI Targets
POLTargets
POLTargets
160%more160%more
68%more68%more
Campaign Against key targets…With F-22sCampaign Against key targets…With F-22s
• 30-Day MRC • SWA 2010 Scenario• Thunder Model• Joint Forces
• 30-Day MRC • SWA 2010 Scenario• Thunder Model• Joint Forces
123%more123%more
Total Interdiction
Targets
Total Interdiction
Targets
-
100%
90%
80%
70%
60%
50%
40%
30%
20%
10%
0%
Limited CampaignLimited Campaign
0 1 2 3 4 65 7 8
F-22 (Block 3/4)
Days
Legacy Forces
Swift DefeatSwift Defeat
Source: LMCO
80%80%
25%25%
• F-22 completes 80% in 6 Days
• Legacy Forces complete only 25%
• F-22 completes 80% in 6 Days
• Legacy Forces complete only 25%
-
From F-15 to F-22From F-15 to F-22•F-15C: Air superiority
•No Combat Losses
•F-15E: Longer range strike; real-time strike
What the F-15 Provides
What the F-15 Provides
What the F-15 Cannot ProvideWhat the F-15 Cannot Provide
•Survivability–Stealth–Supercruise–SEAD
•Logistics– Deployable– Supportable
Combination of Transformation Ingredients
•Battlespace Fusion– Combine information from multiples sources
•Mission network– IFDL tactics in heavily defended airspace
• Integrated Sensors– Radar, electronic intelligence, target discrimination
-
Payoff of SupercruisePayoff of Supercruise
1
23
4
Signature0.9MSpeed
10
9
8
7
6
5
4
3
2
1
Relative Loss Rate(Lower is Better)
Relative Loss Rate(Lower is Better)
SAMsSAMs
Current Fighter
• Altitude: 40,000 ft• EADSIM
-
Payoff of SupercruisePayoff of Supercruise
12
3
4
Signature0.9MSpeed
10
9
8
7
6
5
4
3
2
1
Relative Loss Rate(Lower is Better)
Relative Loss Rate(Lower is Better) SAMsSAMs
1.3M
Current Fighter
F-35
F-22
• Only F-22 has the supercruise edge (not F-35)• Altitude: 40,000 ft• EADSIM
-
Payoff of SupercruisePayoff of Supercruise
12
3
4
Signature0.9M
1.7M
Speed
10
9
8
7
6
5
4
3
2
1
Relative Loss Rate(Lower is Better)
Relative Loss Rate(Lower is Better) SAMsSAMs
1.3M
Current Fighter
F-35
F-22
• Only F-22 has the supercruise edge (not F-35)• Altitude: 40,000 ft• EADSIM
-
Payoff of SupercruisePayoff of Supercruise
1 2 3 4Signature0.9M
1.7M
Speed
12
3
4
Signature0.9M
1.7M
Speed
10987654321
Relative Loss Rate(Lower is Better)
Relative Loss Rate(Lower is Better) SAMsSAMs FightersFighters
1.3M
1.3M
Current Fighter
Current Fighter10987654321
• Only F-22 has the supercruise edge (not F-35)• Vital against SAMS and fighters
-
Homeland SecurityHomeland Security• Homeland security is the
first priority of national security
– Over 300 fighters airborne after September 11
• Counter-air and cruise missile capabilities will be a cornerstone of air dominance at home
“America is no longer protected by vast oceans.” – Pres. Bush, State of the
Union, Jan 02
“America is no longer protected by vast oceans.” – Pres. Bush, State of the
Union, Jan 02
-
Evolving ThreatEvolving Threat
BallisticMissilesBallisticMissiles
Military AircraftMilitary Aircraft
Cruise MissilesCruise Missiles
AirlinersCommercialCharters
AirlinersCommercialCharters
General AviationGeneral Aviation
Ultra LightsUAVsUltra LightsUAVs
BalloonsBlimpsBalloonsBlimps
“By the end of the decade, land attack cruise missiles could pose a serious threat not only to our deployed forces, but possibly even the US mainland.”– CIADirector Tenet, March 02
“By the end of the decade, land attack cruise missiles could pose a serious threat not only to our deployed forces, but possibly even the US mainland.”– CIADirector Tenet, March 02
Prior FocusPrior Focus
12.9 min462 kts100nmApache
32.4 min462 kts250nmScalp
Time to Impact
Sea level Speed
RangeSystem
New FocusNew Focus
-
Flat Dash Intercept RadiusFlat Dash Intercept Radius
Scalp: 250nm Scalp: 250nm
110 nm @ Mach 1.5110 nm @ Mach 1.5 F-15C: Intercept Fails
F-15C: Intercept Fails
218 nm @ Mach 1.5218 nm @ Mach 1.5
15.1 min15.1 min
32.4 min32.4 min
7.6 min7.6 min
-
Flat Dash Intercept RadiusFlat Dash Intercept Radius
F-15C: Intercept Fails
F-15C: Intercept Fails
150 nm150 nm
Apache: 100nm Apache: 100nm
12.9 min12.9 min
150 nm150 nm
10.4 min10.4 min16.5 min16.5 min
-
Air Sovereignty Alert: Suspicious Aircraft Visual IdentificationAir Sovereignty Alert: Suspicious Aircraft Visual Identification
150 nm
150 nm
10.4 min
16.5 min
• F-22 can position for VID in two-thirds the time• Arrive on scene with fuel to spare• F-22 can position for VID in two-thirds the time• Arrive on scene with fuel to spare
• Response times are critical to air sovereignty
• Tragically, the Sept 11 hijackings of AA 11 and UA 175 took only 45 minutes time of flight
-
2
2,1
1,2
3
2
2
1
1
1
1
2
111
12
12
22,1
2 2
1
21
21
2
3
1,1
2
2
2
3 1 1
2
2
2
1
2
2
1
22
221 1
22
1,1
2,121 1,2
1
12 1
2,1 2
111
Critical InfrastructureCritical Infrastructure
Operating Nuclear Reactor at that Site
All Reactor(s) at this site have been shut down but nuclear materials are still present
Reactor(s) have been fully decommissioned
Suspended Reactor Site
Flight Paths Unknown at Launch
-
Operating Nuclear Reactor at that Site
All Reactor(s) at this site have been shut down but nuclear materials are still present
Reactor(s) have been fully decommissioned
Suspended Reactor Site
Critical Infrastructure: Nuclear Power PlantsCritical Infrastructure: Nuclear Power Plants
2
2,1
1,2
3
2
2
1
1
1
1
2
111
12
12
22,1
2 2
1
21
21
2
3
1,1
2
2
2
3 1 1
2
2
2
1
2
2
1
22
221 1
22
1,1
2,121 1,2
1
12 1
2,1 2
111• CAP= 2 F-15s; 110
nm radius; 4 hour on-station• 12 F-15s/CAP/24/7• 28 CAPS
• CAP= 2 F-15s; 110 nm radius; 4 hour on-station• 12 F-15s/CAP/24/7• 28 CAPS
336 F-15s7
8
13
-
Operating Nuclear Reactor at that Site
All Reactor(s) at this site have been shut down but nuclear materials are still present
Reactor(s) have been fully decommissioned
Suspended Reactor Site
Critical Infrastructure: Nuclear Power PlantsCritical Infrastructure: Nuclear Power Plants
2
2,1
1,2
3
2
2
1
1
1
1
2
111
12
12
22,1
2 2
1
21
21
2
3
1,1
2
2
2
3 1 1
2
2
2
1
2
2
1
22
221 1
22
1,1
2,121 1,2
1
12 1
2,1 2
111
3
4
7
• CAP= 2 F-22s; 218 nm radius; 4 hour on-station• 12 F-22s/CAP/24/7• 14 CAPS
• CAP= 2 F-22s; 218 nm radius; 4 hour on-station• 12 F-22s/CAP/24/7• 14 CAPS
168 F-22s
-
• Aircraft or next generation cruise missiles with WMD warheads will jeopardize deployed joint forces
• F-22 required for intercept
• Protect ports, cities, bases, people
493 nm443 s+ 50 @ 1.5
F-22 Intercept RadiusF-22 Intercept Radius
ubsonic
300 nm250 subsonic + 50 @ 1.5
-
493 nm443 subsonic + 50 @ 1.5
300 nm250 subsonic + 50 @ 1.5
2020: All Azimuth Threat2020: All Azimuth Threat• By 2020,
cruise missiles will threaten overseas bases from multiple axes of attack
• F-22 needed for coverage
• By 2020, cruise missiles will threaten overseas bases from multiple axes of attack
• F-22 needed for coverage
-
Peer CompetitorPeer Competitor50Su-30
Su-27
J-8a/e
OtherAirToAir
OtherAirTo
Gnd
200
250
700
1500
2700Fighters
• F-22s provide air cover and lethal SEAD for B-2 strike
• F-22s provide air cover and lethal SEAD for B-2 strike
300 nm250 subsonic + 50 @ 1.5
493 nm443 subsonic + 50 @ 1.5
• PRC: 250+ advanced fighters (Su-27 and Su-30 with AA-12 missiles)
• Volume of fighter and SAM coverage; blue fighters run out of missiles
• PRC: 250+ advanced fighters (Su-27 and Su-30 with AA-12 missiles)
• Volume of fighter and SAM coverage; blue fighters run out of missiles
-
Peer Competitor: B-2 EscortPeer Competitor: B-2 Escort50Su-30
Su-27
J-8a/e
OtherAirToAir
OtherAirTo
Gnd
200
250
700
1500
2700Fighters
• F-22s provide air cover and lethal SEAD for B-2 strike
• F-22s provide air cover and lethal SEAD for B-2 strike
300 nm250 subsonic + 50 @ 1.5
493 nm443 subsonic + 50 @ 1.5
1.0
9Relative
Aim-points Hit by
B-2
NoF-22
With F-22 Escort
B-2: 9x
More
-
F-22 Penetrating C4ISRF-22 Penetrating C4ISR
-
Today’s NetworkToday’s Network
• ACE• CAOC• ACE• CAOC
StealthStealthStrikeStrike
Air ControlAir Control
Compass Call
• Commjammers •EA-6B • F-16CJ HARM Shooter
DefenseDefense
BattleManagersBattleManagers
• AWACS• Rivet Joint• ABCCC
Command and ControlCommand and Control
Tankers andAirliftTankers andAirlift
SensorsSensors • Satellites• Recce• UAVs• FACs
SEADSEAD
-
Today’s NetworkToday’s Network
• ACE• CAOC• ACE• CAOC
StealthStealthStrikeStrike
Air ControlAir Control
Compass Call
• Commjammers •EA-6B • F-16CJ HARM Shooter
DefenseDefense
BattleManagersBattleManagers
• AWACS• Rivet Joint• ABCCC
Command and ControlCommand and Control
Tankers andAirliftTankers andAirlift
SensorsSensors • Satellites• Recce• UAVs• FACs
SEADSEAD
“Never build an airplane that’s single purpose ever again” -- SecAF Roche
“Never build an airplane that’s single purpose ever again” -- SecAF Roche
Vietnam-era design
Vietnam-era design
LDHD forceLDHD force
-
F-22 Integrated Avionics
SU27080/3135.6 FT
SU27080/3135.6 FT
1.3M1305Vc
E
N S
40
20
100415T 49.0
+2o-4o
Displays
F-22 Integrated Avionics
Radar
Passive RFSensors Controls &
Displays
Communications,Navigation,
Identification (CNI)
Electro-Optical(MLD) Sensors
CommonFiber OpticInterfaces Common IntegratedProcessors (CIPs)
High Speed (Optical) Data Bus
Mass Memory &Data Transfer Unit
(DTU)
-
Battlespace FusionBattlespace Fusion• In Flight Datalink fuses
and displays data– Low Probability of
Intercept (LPI) radar
• Creates fighter “local area network”– Secure and Stealthy– Line of sight– Low probability of
exploitation
-
NetworkNetwork
ISR
IFDL Net
• F-22 IFDL forms tactical network reaching into heavily defended airspace
• Job one: ISR sweep to characterize battlespace
• F-22 IFDL forms tactical network reaching into heavily defended airspace
• Job one: ISR sweep to characterize battlespace
-
NetworkNetwork
JDAM Strike
Red Cruise Missile
Red Fighter
ISR
IFDL Net
• F-22s evaluate battlespaceand pass shot decision information
• Counter red cruise missiles and fighters
• JDAM on coordinates
• F-22s evaluate battlespaceand pass shot decision information
• Counter red cruise missiles and fighters
• JDAM on coordinates
-
NetworkNetwork
JDAM Strike
Red Cruise Missile
Red Fighter
SEAD
ISR
IFDL Net
• F-22s attack SAM sites
• F-22s attack SAM sites
SEAD
-
NetworkNetwork
JDAM Strike
Red Cruise Missile
Red Fighter
SEAD
ISR
IFDL Net
• Battlespacenetwork permits flexible mission tactics
• Enhanced support for other platforms
• Architecture for future F-35, UAVs
• Battlespacenetwork permits flexible mission tactics
• Enhanced support for other platforms
• Architecture for future F-35, UAVs
SEAD
-
Battlespace Fusion: Building BlockBattlespace Fusion: Building Block• F-22 is first platform with
survivable, advanced sensor integration
• Building block of pre-2010 network
• F-22 serves as fielded prototype for experimentation and tactical development of wider air combat network
• Without robust F-22, penetrating battlespace fusion is not possible
• Distributed• Multi-role• Collaborative• Survivable
-
How Many F-22s?How Many F-22s?
-
F-22 Tasking: Future?F-22 Tasking: Future?
• Scenario 2• 144 F-22s
– 6 AEFs @ 24 PAA
• CONR Homeland Security
• 168 CAP fighters
• Alert (AK/HI)
24 168 96
144
Decisive defeat
• Scenario 1• 96 F-22s
– 4 AEFs @ 24 PAA
Swift defeat
~432 Combat-coded air dominance fighters
-
How Many F-22s?How Many F-22s?
13+503260240382
2.06+122601204807621.55654590360560
0.8 (20 acft)2++6026512023390.4 (15 acft)1+211529115180
Squadrons per AEF (24 acft)
WingsTest and Attrition
Backup Inventory
TrainingCombat Coded
Total Buy
• SECAF: May look at buying 500
• ACC/XP: Requirement is 2.0 squadrons per AEF
• AF/XOR: 1 squadron per AEF is “bare bones”; preferred is 1.5 squadrons per AEF
• QDR 97 said: “This decision will provide 3 wings of this stealth air supremacy platform”
~500~500~762~762~560~560~380~380
514611Active
98126Guard
612736Total
PAIInventoryF-15sAll F-15s
todayAll F-15s
today
-
F-22 Tasking: Future?F-22 Tasking: Future?
• Scenario 2• 144 F-22s
– 6 AEFs @ 24 PAA
• CONR Homeland Security
• 168 CAP fighters
• Alert (AK/HI)
24
~432 Combat-coded air dominance fighters
168 96
144
Decisive defeat
• Scenario 1• 96 F-22s
– 4 AEFs @ 24 PAA
Swift defeat
-
The Importance of Being Flexible
Average: Every 1.7
Years
Average: Every 1.7
Years
USAF Combat Controller with Northern Alliance
19891989 19911991 19951995 19961996 19981998 19991999 20012001 2011201120052005
DeliberateForce
Desert StormAllied Force
EnduringFreedom
B-2 IOC B-2 Combat
Irbil
?Desert Fox
PanamaF-22 IOC
• Frequent operations• Most advanced systems
employed heavily
F-35 IOC
-
F-22 technology development and risk reduction flow to F-35
Advanced LO Materials and Manufacturing
Radar
F119/F120 Engine Development
Integrated avionics
Concept development: Networked air combat
F-22 and F-35: PartnershipF-22 and F-35: Partnership
Unique F-22 Capabilities
F-35 System Development
-
“We think we have a truly transformational system here.” -- General Jumper, July 2002
Airpower Transformed WarfareFor the 21st Century…Fighter Transformation?The Importance of Being FlexibleJoint Airpower Transformation1997 Matrix: Old StrategyA New MatrixTransforming Air DominanceTransformation RequirementsF-22 and the Joint Air ComponentCampaign Against key targets…With F-15sCampaign Against key targets…With F-22sFrom F-15 to F-22Payoff of SupercruisePayoff of SupercruisePayoff of SupercruisePayoff of SupercruiseHomeland SecurityEvolving ThreatFlat Dash Intercept RadiusFlat Dash Intercept RadiusAir Sovereignty Alert: Suspicious Aircraft Visual IdentificationCritical InfrastructureCritical Infrastructure: Nuclear Power PlantsCritical Infrastructure: Nuclear Power PlantsF-22 Intercept Radius2020: All Azimuth ThreatPeer CompetitorPeer Competitor: B-2 EscortF-22 Penetrating C4ISRToday’s NetworkToday’s NetworkF-22 Integrated AvionicsBattlespace FusionNetworkNetworkNetworkNetworkBattlespace Fusion: Building BlockHow Many F-22s?F-22 Tasking: Future?How Many F-22s?F-22 Tasking: Future?The Importance of Being FlexibleF-22 and F-35: Partnership