Transfer of Energy Through Time and

Coupling of Parallel Universes

(Date: unknown; Source: Matrix III)

Leading Edge Research, P.. !ox "#$%M&'#, ashington State, .*. +#'+ .*

-: oud /ou ex0ain /our theories a1out ti2e and energ/3

4: hen I was in *rance, I was 0art o5 a grou0 ooking into theories o5 entro0/ states andthe genera ther2od/na2ics o5 0as2as. 6he natura rate o5 entro0/ increase in a cosed

s/ste2 de5ines the 5ow o5 what is 0ercei7ed as ti2e. e were tr/ing to de7eo0 a 1etter

insight into the 0rocess o5 s/nchroni8ation 1etween a00arent/ uncou0ed s/ste2s, in

other words to ex0ain how ti2e 2anages to 5ow at the sa2e rate in di55erent 0arts o5 theuni7erse. e ended u0 deri7ing a set o5 2athe2atica ex0ressions that interreated

entro0/ 5unctions, 9uantu2 energ/ states, and s0aceti2e coordinates o5 9uantu2 e7ents.

In 0articuar, certain 7aria1es that coud 1e inter0reted as ti2e and energ/ turned out to 1e co7ariant.

-: Do /ou 2ean there was so2e kind o5 e9ui7aence reationshi03

4: ot 9uite. !ut /ou coud a2ost think o5 it in that wa/. It 2eant that the uni7erse

coud 1e re0resented 1/ an ense21e o5 e7ents<, each characteri8ed 1/ a set o5 energ/states and s0aceti2e nu21ers; nothing 2ore. In such a re0resentation o5 the uni7erse, the

idea o5 conser7ation o5 2ass%energ/ did not hod; it was re0aced 1/ a conser7ation o5 the

 0roduct o5 that 9uantit/ with s0aceti2e. !/ 2eans o5 2ath trans5or2s, it was 0ossi1e to

trans5or2 one uni7erse into another in which the 9uantit/ 7aried in7erse/ with the other.I5 /ou 2ade a the s0atia 7aria1es constant, the s0aceti2e 5unctions reduced to 0ure

ti2e; /ou coud trans5or2 energ/ to ti2e and 7ice 7ersa. e had no idea at that ti2e

what that 2eant.

-: hat did it e7entua/ 2ean3

4: hat it see2ed to sa/ was that energ/ coud 1e extracted 5ro2 the uni7erse, which is

where ordinar/ conser7ation 1reaks down, and in=ected into another 7ersion o5 that

uni7erse in which the ti2e coordinates o5 a the <e7ents were shi5ted 1/ so2e a2ount.6he 2ore energ/ /ou trans5or2ed, the greater the ti2e shi5t woud 1e. I5 that was

inter0reted as taking 0ace within the sa2e uni7erse, it see2ed to suggest that%energ/

coud 1e trans5erred through ti2e. e 2ust concude that a 7ersions o5 the uni7erse in

which we exist, inter0reted inear/ as Past, 5uture etc. are e9ua/ rea. 6hus we ha7ea continuu2. 6he on/ 2ode I can think o5 is a co20ex seria one in which atering the

e7ents in a 0ast uni7erse a55ects not on/ the 5uture o5 that 0articuar uni7erse as it

e7o7es in ti2e, 1ut aso the 0resents o5 a the other uni7erses that ie ahead o5 it. In

 

other words, there is a 2echanis2 o5 casua connection through the continuu2 that the

si20e seria 2ode does not address.

-: oud /ou ex0and on that conce0t3

4: E7er/thing we ha7e disco7ered so 5ar see2s to add u0 to two things. *irst, theuni7erse that we see around us and which 5or2s 0art o5 us is si20/ one o5 2an/, e9ua/

rea uni7erses that a00ear to 1e strung se9uentia/ aong a singe ti2eine. Second,

e7ents that ha00en in this uni7erse a55ect not on/ its 5uture, 1ut the situations in a theother uni7erses that ie ahead o5 it. 6hat,%o5 course, suggests a continuit/ throughout the

s/ste2; the 5uture uni7erses ahead o5 us 5or2 a 0rogression o5 states that are e7o7ing

5ro2 the 0resent state. e need to ask ourse7es what the 2echanis2 is that 0ro7ides thatcontinuit/. 6hat sa2e 2echanis2 wi ena1e an e7ent in one uni7erse to ater e7ents in

another uni7erse. 6he continuit/ 5oows 5ro2 the 5act that o1=ects, 1eing 2ass, don<t

7anish; the/ endure in ti2e.

-: &ness, o5 course, the/ are dei1erate/ withdrawn 5ro2 the coordinates the/ occu0/.

4: >es. Mass arranges itse5 into di55erent 0atterns to 0roduce the changes we associatewith the 0assage o5 ti2e, 1ut in doing so it 0ro7ides the connection and continuit/ that

ena1es one uni7erse to e7o7e 5ro2 another. *or exa20e, i5 a cande has 1urned down,

in the uni7erse 1ehind us it is sti intact; in the uni7erse ahead it 0ro1a1/ does notexist at a in that 5or2. 6he whoe cande is the su2 o5 a o5 the2. I ha7e a drawing here

that wi assist in an ex0anation. 6r/ thinking o5 a two%di2ensiona anaog/. I2agine

that the uni7erse is 5at and e7er/thing it contains is 5at. ow 5or2 a soid continuu2 1/stacking an in5inite nu21er o5 8erothickness 0anes ike that together, ike the 0ages o5 an

in5inite/ thick 1ook. E7er/ 0age is one uni7erse. Mass continues through these 0ages in

a thread%ike 2anner. ?n/1od/ inside one o5 those uni7erses wi see 2ass 0atterns

change se9uentia/.

Look at the diagra2 I drew. Each uni7erse consists o5 a s0ace containing o1=ects and

inha1itants that are a 2ade u0 o5 0artices, or at east that is what it ooks ike i5 /ou

ha00en to i7e inside one o5 the2.

e, in our 0ri7eaged 0osition as su0ero1ser7ers ooking in 5ro2 the outside, can see thate7er/ 0artice o5 2ass is rea/ an in5initesi2a/ thin sice o5 a thread that 0asses through

a the uni7erses. ?s the uni7erse 2o7es aong the threads in so2e kind o5 su0erti2e, the

 0artices or sices a00ear to 2o7e through s0ace. 6hat gi7es a 7isi1e rate o5 change thatis o1ser7ed as .. nor2a ti2e within the uni7erse. *ro2 our 0osition we can see that a

the uni7erses are e9ua/ rea, on/ the one that /ou ha00en to 1e 0art o5 and 2o7ing with

gi7es the iusion o5 a00earing 2ore rea to /ou then the rest o5 the2.

-: So /ou woud 1e a1e to send signas or trans0ort 2ass 5ro2 one uni7erse to the other.

4: Exact/.

 

-: I5 /ou send a signa 5ro2 one uni7erse to another which changes an e7ent 0attern, I

assu2e that the 2e2or/ o5 ha7ing a reason to change that e7ent is erased as soon as the

e7ent is changed3

4: >es, 1ecause our 2e2ories consist o5 eectroche2ica and D? 0attern changes.

E7er/thing that 5or2ed an/ record o5 the origina 0attern was reset. 4ence, our 2e2ories

are consistent with the new 0attern that now exists. In actuait/, causes and e55ects exist

not on a series on a unidirectiona ti2e ine, 1ut the s/ste2 is d/na2ic in that ti2e oo0sexist, and these oo0s 2ake it 0ossi1e, in e55ect, 5or e55ects to 1e detected 1e5ore the

cause o5 the e55ect exists.

-: I think the hoogra0hic 2ode o5 the uni7erse woud ex0ain it, 1ecause o5 theinterconnectedness o5 e7er/thing through h/0ers0acia 5or2ats. 6he su0ero1ser7er that

/ou are taking a1out is in 5act consciousness itse5 % a wa7e and 0artice interchanges

are, in actuait/, consciousness as 7iewed 5ro2 di55erent 0ers0ecti7es. ?ccess to what are

 0ercei7ed as di55erent s0aceti2e coordinates can uti2ate/ 1e acco20ished throughthe 2ani0uations o5 consciousness, so an/ de7ices that are de7ised to acco20ish this

 0ur0ose si20/ 2i2ic the 2enta o0erations in consciousness o5 2ore e7o7ed 1eings.

6here are 2an/ transitionar/ instances where aien e9ui02ent is tuned to the s0eci5ic 0atterns o5 a 0articuar 1eing, and the e9ui02ent 5unctions as a 2oduator or transductor

o5 consciousness. 6i2e 5ow, as /ou 2ention it, a00ies within certain 1oundaries, and

e7er/thing h/0ers0acia to those 1oundaries 5unctions in ter2s o5 that which 2akes u0the conce0tua oo0s that /ou s0eak o5. ? in a, it 2akes 5or an interesting discussion.