TRANSCRIPT Judge Nielsen 3.30pm Jun 28 2006 Discovery

28
IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE THIRTEENTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT IN AND FOR HILLSBOROUGH COUNTY FLORIDA CIVIL DIVISION  NEIL GILLESPIE Plaintiff Case No.: 05CA7205 Division: F vs. BARKER RODEMS & COOK P.A. a Florida corporation; and WILLIAM J . COOK Defendants. _/ TRANSCRIPT OF PROCEEDINGS BEFORE: Honorable Richard A. Nielsen Circuit Judge TAKEN AT: Hillsborough County Courthouse Tampa Florida DATE: June 28 2006 TIME: 3:30 p.m. REPORTER: William Herrmann Court Reporter Notary Public State of Florida a t Large Berryhill & Associates Inc. 813-229-8225

Transcript of TRANSCRIPT Judge Nielsen 3.30pm Jun 28 2006 Discovery

Page 1: TRANSCRIPT Judge Nielsen 3.30pm Jun 28 2006 Discovery

8/13/2019 TRANSCRIPT Judge Nielsen 3.30pm Jun 28 2006 Discovery

http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/transcript-judge-nielsen-330pm-jun-28-2006-discovery 1/28

IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE THIRTEENTH JUDICIAL

CIRCUIT IN AND FOR HILLSBOROUGH COUNTY FLORIDA

CIVIL DIVISION 

NEIL GILLESPIE

Pla in t i f f Case No.: 05CA7205

Divis ion : F

vs .

BARKER RODEMS & COOK P.A.

a Flor ida corpora t ion; and

WILLIAM J . COOK

Defendants.

_/

TRANSCRIPT OF PROCEEDINGS

BEFORE: Honorable Richard A. Niel sen

Circu i t Judge

TAKEN AT: Hil lsborough County CourthouseTampa Florida

DATE: June 28 2006

TIME: 3:30 p.m.

REPORTER:Will iam HerrmannCourt Reporter

Notary PublicSta te of Flor ida a t Large

Ber ryh i l l & Assoc ia tes Inc.813-229-8225

Page 2: TRANSCRIPT Judge Nielsen 3.30pm Jun 28 2006 Discovery

8/13/2019 TRANSCRIPT Judge Nielsen 3.30pm Jun 28 2006 Discovery

http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/transcript-judge-nielsen-330pm-jun-28-2006-discovery 2/28

APPEARANCES

RYAN CHRISTOPHER RODEMS, ESQUIRE

Barker, Rodems & Cook, PA

400 North Ashley Drive, Sui te 2100

Tampa, FL 33602

NEIL J . GILLESPIE, (pro se l i t i gan t )

8092 SW 115 t Loop

Ocala , Flor ida 34481

Page 3: TRANSCRIPT Judge Nielsen 3.30pm Jun 28 2006 Discovery

8/13/2019 TRANSCRIPT Judge Nielsen 3.30pm Jun 28 2006 Discovery

http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/transcript-judge-nielsen-330pm-jun-28-2006-discovery 3/28

INDEX

PAGE

Appearances 2

Index 3

Proceed ings 4

e r t i f i c a t e o f eporter 23

Page 4: TRANSCRIPT Judge Nielsen 3.30pm Jun 28 2006 Discovery

8/13/2019 TRANSCRIPT Judge Nielsen 3.30pm Jun 28 2006 Discovery

http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/transcript-judge-nielsen-330pm-jun-28-2006-discovery 4/28

4

PROCEEDINGS

THE COURT: What case?

MR RODEMS:Your Honor, t h i s i s G i l l e s p i e v.

Barker and J . Cook, William J . Cook.

THE COURT: All r igh t , what s up for today?

MR RODEMS: Your Honor, the f i r s t motion i s

the defendant s Motion to Compel Discovery and to

cont inue p l a i n t i f f s hearing on his Motion for

Summary Judgment. That was served, I be l i eve , on

May 11 t•

THE COURT: Yes, s i r , I see t ha t . And go

ahead.

MR RODEMS: All r igh t . Your Honor, Chris

Rodems for defendants . On June - - on March 28 t

2006, we served some i n t e r roga to r i e s and a Request

for Product ion on Mr. Gi l l esp ie . We d i d n t

5 treceive a response. On May of 2006, I sent an

e-mai l to Mr. Gil lesp ie advis ing him t ha t the

in te r roga tor ie s were overdue and it s our good-

f a i t h e f fo r t to t ry to resolve it. Fina l ly a week

ago, on June 21 s t 2006, very untimely, we

rece ived responses to the i n t e r roga t o r i e s and a

response to the Request for Produc t ion and a

number of object ion to each but , of course ,

untimely object ions to discovery are waived under

Page 5: TRANSCRIPT Judge Nielsen 3.30pm Jun 28 2006 Discovery

8/13/2019 TRANSCRIPT Judge Nielsen 3.30pm Jun 28 2006 Discovery

http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/transcript-judge-nielsen-330pm-jun-28-2006-discovery 5/28

Page 6: TRANSCRIPT Judge Nielsen 3.30pm Jun 28 2006 Discovery

8/13/2019 TRANSCRIPT Judge Nielsen 3.30pm Jun 28 2006 Discovery

http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/transcript-judge-nielsen-330pm-jun-28-2006-discovery 6/28

6

s ha l l be spec i f ied, closed quote . He d i d n t make

2 those ob jec t i ons in h i s Apri l 29th l e t t e r .

3 He a l so promised in t ha t l e t t e r and d i d n t

4 f u l f i l l t tha t he would send us the responses by

5 May 17 th• I t says, quote - and I m reading from

6 h is l e t t e r which he a t t ached to Exhib i t 3 - to a

7 motion t ha t he f i l ed today, quote , in the

8 a l t e r na t i ve , I wi l l respond to your Request for

9 Product ion by mail ing copies of the i tems

1 reques ted , comma sub jec t to ob jec t ion , comma, by

May 15 t 2006, c losed quote. That d id not

12 happen. He a l so made the same promise about the

13 i n t e r roga tory answers and t ha t did not happen.

14 So, what we r e seeking today i s an order , Your

15 Honor, compell ing him to respond to the

16 i n t e r r oga to r i e s without the ob jec t ions and for

17 a t t o rn e y s fees . He r a i sed a number of ob jec t ions

18 on pr iv i l ege and t h e r e s some debate, I be l i eve ,

19 st ll in the appe l l a t e cour t s about whether

2 pr i v i l e ge s can be waived by not t imely objec t ing .

21 But regard less of whether they can or cannot , he

d i d n t provide a pr iv i l ege log as r equ i r ed by

23 Flor ida Rule of Civ i l Procedure 1.280 (b) (5) .

4 As fa r as the i n t e r r oga to r i e s , in a number of

25 the answers he says he was r e ly ing on Flo r ida Rule

Page 7: TRANSCRIPT Judge Nielsen 3.30pm Jun 28 2006 Discovery

8/13/2019 TRANSCRIPT Judge Nielsen 3.30pm Jun 28 2006 Discovery

http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/transcript-judge-nielsen-330pm-jun-28-2006-discovery 7/28

7

of Civ i l Procedure 1.340, sub paren C, which, as

2 Your Honor knows, i s the opt ion to produce

3 records . The only problem was, he d i d n ' t produce

4 any records , d idn ' t make any ava i l ab le to us and

5 d i dn ' t point to us in these unproduced o r

undeclared records where we could f ind the answers

7 to i n t e r ro g a t o r i e s . Ins tead , h is response was,

8 You have these records , and he says we have them

9 from rep re sen t ing him in the pas t . But I would

1 poin t out to the Court two th ings : F i r s t o f a l l ,

11 t h a t ' s not proper procedure under Rule 1 .340(c ) ;

12 you can ' t j u s t say, you a l ready know , t h a t ' s not

13 the way you respond. And second, our

14 r ep resen ta t ion of him ended some four or f ive

IS years ago. So, whatever has happened the l a s t

6 four or f ive years , we c e r t a in ly have no idea

17 about . So, hi s responses are de f i c i e n t in t h a t

18 regard .

19 Now we've a l so moved to con t inue h i s August

1s t2 Motion for Summary Judgment on the ba s i s tha t

21 he h a sn ' t provided the discovery t ha t we've

22 reques ted

23 THE COURT: All r i gh t . Well, we ' l l t ake t ha t

24 up i we have t ime a t the end of t h i s hea r ing .

25 Le t ' s address - - are you through with your

Page 8: TRANSCRIPT Judge Nielsen 3.30pm Jun 28 2006 Discovery

8/13/2019 TRANSCRIPT Judge Nielsen 3.30pm Jun 28 2006 Discovery

http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/transcript-judge-nielsen-330pm-jun-28-2006-discovery 8/28

8

discovery i ssues?

MR RODEMS: Yes s i r .

3 THE COURT: Mr. Gil lespie?

4 MR GILLESPIE: Good af te rnoon, Judge. I did

5 respond to the defendant s Request for Product ion.

6 Attached i s a - - to my p l a i n t i f f s Motion for an

7 Order of Protec t ion , Exhibi t 3. I address each

area of product ion. This i s in reply to

9 defendan t s Request for Product ion. They were

1 demanding tha t I come to t he i r of f i c e on May the

4U, 2006 a t 9:00 a.m. I objec ted to t h e i r

12 reques t and I t o ld him I wi l l not appear i n h i s

13 of f i c e for any reason due to h is t h r e a t s aga ins t

14 me. And Judge he has asked for a b a i l i f f to be

15 here; for him to ask me to come to h i s of f i ce , I

16 th ink , i s outrageous.

17 I offered to - - in the a l t e rna t i ve , I of fe red

18 to respond to h is reques t by mai l ing copies of the

19 i tems requested subject to ob jec t ion by May 15 t•

20 He never responded to t h i s o ther than to f i l e h is

21 Motion to Compel. And with regard to the

22 in te r roga tor ie s , I gave him the same answer I

23 wil l provide the answers subject to ob jec t ion by

24 May 15 t; again he did not respond to t ha t o ther

25 than to f i l e a Motion to Compel. And he f i l ed

Page 9: TRANSCRIPT Judge Nielsen 3.30pm Jun 28 2006 Discovery

8/13/2019 TRANSCRIPT Judge Nielsen 3.30pm Jun 28 2006 Discovery

http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/transcript-judge-nielsen-330pm-jun-28-2006-discovery 9/28

9

tha t Motion to Compel before May 15th

• So, when

2 he did tha t , I took tha t as a cons t ruc t ive

re jec t ion of what he was offe r ing - - of what I

4 of fe red him and, therefore , I j u s t responded to

5 his Motion to Compel with t h i s l e t t e r o f

6 pro tec t ion and the responses are a t t ached .

7 I also noted tha t he has - - a l l the i tems

8 requested to which you are e n t i t l e d by way o f your

9 pr i o r r ep resen ta t ion of me. Now Mr. Rodems has

1 t o ld the Court t ha t t h i s was four or f ive years

11 ago and t h a t s t rue , but nothing pe r t i ne n t to t h i s

12 case has happened dur ing t ha t t ime. The mat te r s

3 t ha t he knows about involve fraud and breach of

14 cont rac t are from t ha t t ime per iod .

15 I m asking the Court in my Order of

6 Protect ion to l imi t t he i r tha t the records

7 asked to be produced are kept in Ocala . I f Mr.

18 Rodems wants to view them because he r e j e c t e d my

19 of f e r to send copies , then he can view them a t the

2 Marion County Law Library upon not ice to me. And

21 the law l i b r a ry has f ac i l i t i e s t he re to copy the

22 documents for Mr. Rodems. It s a l so a secure

23 f a c i l i t y with a ba i l i f f present as i s requ i red

24 here .

25 As to the discovery where I invoke the

Page 10: TRANSCRIPT Judge Nielsen 3.30pm Jun 28 2006 Discovery

8/13/2019 TRANSCRIPT Judge Nielsen 3.30pm Jun 28 2006 Discovery

http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/transcript-judge-nielsen-330pm-jun-28-2006-discovery 10/28

10

a t torney-c l ien t pr iv i l ege , I m going to ask t ha t

2 t ha t discovery be prohib i ted . He s asked for my

3 medical records which bear nothing on t h i s case

4 whatsoever. I v e asked - I v e invoked the

5 doc to r -pa t i en t p r iv i l ege and asked for t ha t

6 discovery to be prohib i ted .

7 As to the discovery I objec ted to , I ask the

8 Court to proh ib i t t ha t discovery and to r e ly on

9 the records under Rule 1.340(c) , opt ion to produce

1 records . The records are a l ready in t h e i r

possess ion and, spec i f ica l ly , those records are

12 the answers to i n t e r roga to r i e s in two cases : That

3 would be the Amscott lawsui t and the Ace l awsu i t .

14 The discovery for produc t ion of documents in those

15 lawsui ts , a depos i t ion on May 14 2001,

16 se t t lement on October 30 t and November p o f 2001

17 and another depos i t ion on October 10 lh 2000 and

18 another se t t lement on June 12 t 2000. I fee l

19 t ha t they have every th ing t ha t t h e y r e e n t i t l e d

20 t o .

21 And I also asked - because Mr. Rodems

22 ind ica ted tha t he in tends to depose Am scot t s

23 a t to rney , Mr. John -

24 THE COURT: Emmanuel.

25 MR GILLESPIE: Pardon?

Page 11: TRANSCRIPT Judge Nielsen 3.30pm Jun 28 2006 Discovery

8/13/2019 TRANSCRIPT Judge Nielsen 3.30pm Jun 28 2006 Discovery

http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/transcript-judge-nielsen-330pm-jun-28-2006-discovery 11/28

11

THE COURT: Wasn t it Emmanuel?

2 MR GILLESPIE: No it s

3 THE COURT: Pardon me.

4 MR GILLESPIE: - - Mr. Anthony. I asked for a

5 preemptive l e t t e r of pro tec t ion as to the sub jec t

6 mat te r allowed, the t ime, place and s e c ur i t y

7 dura t ion and persons in a t tendance . T h a t s a l l I

8 have to say on tha t and then I have some comments

9 about t he i r Motion to Continue Summary Judgment.

1 THE COURT: Mr. Rodems?

MR RODEMS: All r igh t . Fi r s t o f a l l , Judge,

12 t h i s cont inued a l l ega t ion by Mr. G i l l e s p i e t ha t

13 t h e r e s been a t h r e a t agains t him, t h e r e s been no

14 t h r e a t agains t him; he i s the one t ha t th rea tened

15 me when we had a te lephone conversa t ion and he

16 t o ld me he was going to slam me up aga ins t your

17 hear ing chambers wall . Th a t s never been

18 followed, but he cont inues to repeat it in every

19 plead ing and then, you know, the idea i s t ha t , I

20 guess, i f you ve got j ud i c i a l immunity from what

21 you say - - but the bottom l i ne i s , i s t h a t t h e r e s

22 been nothing but cord ia l behavior on our par t .

23 We ve asked him to send the records to us . He s

24 phras ing t h i s record - - the l e t t e r of Apr i l 29 th

25 as his reques t ; t h e r e s nothing in here t ha t

Page 12: TRANSCRIPT Judge Nielsen 3.30pm Jun 28 2006 Discovery

8/13/2019 TRANSCRIPT Judge Nielsen 3.30pm Jun 28 2006 Discovery

http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/transcript-judge-nielsen-330pm-jun-28-2006-discovery 12/28

12

reques ts me to do anything. He d i d n t give us the

2 records . He's the one tha t asse r t ed he would send

] them to me by May 15 th • Ei ther way, they were

l a t e . He f i l ed no object ions , he did not f i l e a

5 Motion fo r Continuance, he did not ask me for a

6 cont inuance, he did not f i l e a Motion for

7 Pro tec t ive Order. He j u s t did not do anyth ing

8 un t i l a week ago, knowing t ha t t h i s hear ing was

9 the books by t ha t t ime.

1 As fa r as his argument the records are in our

possess ion, we are en t i t l ed to discovery in t h i s

12 case of the mat te rs t ha t he has. I f he has

13 records tha t he says we can gather a l l the answers

14 t ha t we're seeking, h e s got an ob l iga t ion to

15 produce those . He can t j u s t say, you have them N

16 or you know the answer N; t h a t s not a proper

17 discovery response .

18 We're in a s i t ua t ion here, Judge, where Mr.

19 Gi l l esp ie i s not fol lowing the Flor ida Rules of

2 Civ i l Procedure. And so we're here saying, look,

21 the ru les say 3 days to respond; i you choose to

not respond for severa l months and u n t i l a week

23 before the hearing, you know, we have - - we re

24 e n t i t l e d to have the ru les complied with by Mr.

25 Gi l l esp ie . And we would ask you to ru l e h i s

Page 13: TRANSCRIPT Judge Nielsen 3.30pm Jun 28 2006 Discovery

8/13/2019 TRANSCRIPT Judge Nielsen 3.30pm Jun 28 2006 Discovery

http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/transcript-judge-nielsen-330pm-jun-28-2006-discovery 13/28

13

objec t ions unt imely as the case law h o l d s , o rd e r

2 him to prov ide the d i scovery . And if you want to

3 s e t a spec ia l procedure for how he can produce the

4 records to us, I d o n t have any problem with t ha t ,

5 but t h a t d o e s n t excuse f a i l i n g to respond to the

6 Request for Product ion u n t i l a week ago or the

i n t e r ro g a t o r i e s un t i l a week ago.

8 MR GILLESPIE: May I respond to t ha t , Judge?

9 THE COURT: Jus t a moment. Mr. Rodems,

1 address the i ssue of the l oca t ion of p roduc t ion in

t h i s s i t u a t i o n where y o u r e ask ing p ro d u c t i o n from

2 the p l a i n t i f f and y o u r e ask ing for it to be

3 produced in Hil lsborough County.

14 MR RODEMS: Well , the - he brought the case

5 in Hil lsborough County, Mr. G i l l e s p i e d id . And we

16 t h ink it s ap p ro p r i a t e s ince t h i s i s - obviously

7 hear ing t h i s case in Hil lsborough County, we t h ink

18 it s appropr ia te to have the records t h a t we ve

9 reques ted produced here . I f he wants to charge us

2 15 cen t s a page, if the records d o n t exceed 1,000

2 pages , w e l l be happy to pay 15 cen t s if he can

22 send us cop ies . I have no o b j e c t i o n to t h a t as a

23 procedure . You know, so t h a t s p e r f e c t l y f ine .

24 THE COURT: All r i g h t . As to the ob jec t ions ,

25 those are over ru led as being unt imely f i l e d .

Page 14: TRANSCRIPT Judge Nielsen 3.30pm Jun 28 2006 Discovery

8/13/2019 TRANSCRIPT Judge Nielsen 3.30pm Jun 28 2006 Discovery

http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/transcript-judge-nielsen-330pm-jun-28-2006-discovery 14/28

5

1

15

2

25

14

MR GILLESPIE: Judge, can I

2 THE COURT: No s i r . Let me f i n i sh my ru l ing ,

3 s i r . The way it opera tes i s the par ty br inging

4 the motion ge ts to argue, the par ty responding

ge ts a response, the par ty br ing ing the motion

6 ge ts a reply and then it s over unless I ask for

7 some c la r i f i ca t ion . That app l ies not j u s t to pro

8 se par t i e s but everybody tha t comes i n to t h i s

9 hearing room. Do you unders tand?

MR GILLESPIE: Thank you, Judge.

THE COURT: As to the produc t ion , the Rule

12 1.340(c) wil l apply , Mr. Gi l l esp ie , if

13 appropr ia te , as to records t ha t are in your

14 possess ion and kept in the ordinary course of your

record-keeping. I bel ieve you wil l f ind if you

16 research tha t ru le and the terms of the ru l e t ha t

17 tha t permits the opposing party to i n spec t those

18 records as they are kept, In the l oca t ion t ha t

19 they are kept. So, you have the a l t e rna t ive to

comply in tha t manner. In some of your responses ,

21 I th ink you suggest tha t tha t i s not acceptable to

22 you, but I m j u s t t e l l i ng you tha t i s one of your

23 opt ions . I t i s not an opt ion tha t records kept in

24 someone e l s e s possess ion , whether it i s the

p la in t i f f , the defendant or a co-defendant or co

Page 15: TRANSCRIPT Judge Nielsen 3.30pm Jun 28 2006 Discovery

8/13/2019 TRANSCRIPT Judge Nielsen 3.30pm Jun 28 2006 Discovery

http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/transcript-judge-nielsen-330pm-jun-28-2006-discovery 15/28

15

p l a i n t i f f , it i s a r i g h t t h a t e x i s t s only as to

2 the pa r ty d i r e c t l y responding. So you must

respond to t h e Request for Product ion e i t h e r by

4 as I say making those records a v a i l a b l e wherever

5 they are kept in your possess ion; you can make

6 co p ies o f them sub jec t to p r i o r agreement of the

7 p a r t i e s as to volume co s t and t h e l i k e , which i s

R t y p i c a l l y done; or you wil l have to produce them

9 in Hi l l sborough County.

1 Now you can se l e c t the l oca t ion in Hil l sborough

11 County if you dec ide to produce them in

12 Hi l l sborough County.

13 I f anyone wants s ecu r i t y prov ided fo r t ha t ,

14 t h a t s ecu r i t y w i l l be a t the cos t o f t h e p a r ty

15 reques t ing the s ecu r i t y . In o t h e r words t h a t

16 pa r ty , whether it s in Marion County o r

17 Hil lsborough County or some n eu t r a l s i t e in

18 between the pa r ty t h a t wants se c u r i t y makes

19 arrangements for t ha t s ecu r i t y a t t h e i r own cos t .

20 The reason t h a t t h e r e s a b a i l i f f p re s e n t i n t h i s

21 hear ing room i s t ha t it i s the p o l i c y o f t h i s

Cour t whenever t h e r e s a pro se p a r ty , a b a i l i f f

23 i s p res en t i n t h e cour t room - - o r in t h e h ea r in g

24 room o r cour t room. And t h a t s not j u s t my pol icy ,

25 but the p o l i cy o f most othe r j udges and I th ink ,

Page 16: TRANSCRIPT Judge Nielsen 3.30pm Jun 28 2006 Discovery

8/13/2019 TRANSCRIPT Judge Nielsen 3.30pm Jun 28 2006 Discovery

http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/transcript-judge-nielsen-330pm-jun-28-2006-discovery 16/28

16

the preference of the Sher i f f , David Gee, in

2 Hi l l sborough County.

3 As to any p r iv i l eg e t h a t y o u r e r a i s i n g fo r

4 now and s u b j ec t to any cour t dec i s ions t h a t may

5 sway me to the con t ra ry , I m pre se rv ing t h o s e

6 objec t ions , but those objec t ions must be s t a t e d

7 sp e c i f i c a l l y , a p r iv i l eg e log must be produced in

8 accordance wi th the Rules of C i v i l Procedure so

t h a t - and I won t r e c i t e t h a t to you, but in

1 essence you must descr ibe the document

s u f f i c i e n t l y t h a t it can be - some assessment

12 could be made, not only by the o t h e r p a r t y but by

13 t h e Court as to the s u f f i c i e n c y o f t h e c l a im o f

14 p r iv i l eg e on the document and the na tu re of the

15 p r iv i l eg e being asse r ted .

16 Did I miss anyth ing in your motion, Mr.

17 Rodems?

18 MR RODEMS: Yes, s i r , t h e i s sue about

19 a t t o rn e y s fees fo r b r ing ing t h i s motion.

20 THE COURT: That w i l l be g ran t ed and I ll

21 al low the p a r t i e s to e i t h e r agree on some

22 ap p ro p r i a t e amount o r you can se t a s ep a r a t e

23 h ea r in g on t ha t i s sue .

24 MR RODEMS: That covers it, Your Honor.

25 THE COURT: All r i g h t . Now it s 4:39 . M r .

Page 17: TRANSCRIPT Judge Nielsen 3.30pm Jun 28 2006 Discovery

8/13/2019 TRANSCRIPT Judge Nielsen 3.30pm Jun 28 2006 Discovery

http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/transcript-judge-nielsen-330pm-jun-28-2006-discovery 17/28

17

G i l l e s p i e , you have one minute .

2 MR RODEMS: Your Honor I m so r ry , t h e r e was

3 the second p a r t of my motion about the con t inuance

4 o f the summary judgment motion.

THE COURT: When i s summary judgment se t ?

6 MR RODEMS: I be l ieve t h a t s sch ed u led August

7 1s t but obviously - and I guess we a l s o did not

8 di scuss a t ime frame to comply with t h i s C o u r t s

9 order today.

1 THE COURT: Mr Gil lesp ie , i s 20 days

su f f i c i e n t ?

12 MR GILLESPIE: What parameters a re av a i l ab l e

3 fo r mai l ing and so fo r th?

14 THE COURT: Well depending on the - when the

15order ge t s over here , y o u l l have 20 days from the

16 date of the o rder and on the 20 th day from the

17 da te of order , they must be shown as postmarked.

18 MR GILLESPIE: Are you o v e r ru l i n g - did I

19 hear you r i g h t , y o u r e ove r ru l ing the ob jec t ions?

20 THE COURT: I m o v e r ru l i n g a l l o b jec t i o n s

21 except as to p r iv i l eg e .

22 MR GILLESPIE: Can I t ake an i n t e r l o c u t o ry

23 appeal on t h i s , Judge?

24 THE COURT: Y o u l l have to make t h a t dec i s ion

25 on your own based upon your assessment o f my cour t

Page 18: TRANSCRIPT Judge Nielsen 3.30pm Jun 28 2006 Discovery

8/13/2019 TRANSCRIPT Judge Nielsen 3.30pm Jun 28 2006 Discovery

http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/transcript-judge-nielsen-330pm-jun-28-2006-discovery 18/28

18

ru l ing and the ap p l i cab l e case law.

2 MR GILLESPIE: Yes I - I have some case law

3 here bu t I guess I d i d n t p res en t it t ime ly

4 enough. But in any even t , w i l l t h a t s t a y your

5 co u r t order?

6 THE COURT: Y o u l l have to check t he r u l e s on

t h a t , s i r .

8 MR GILLESPIE: Okay. I m probab ly going to

9 t ak e an i n t e r l o cu to r y appeal because I do be l i eve

1 t h a t Mr. Rodems was n o t i f i e d t h a t I objec t ed and

it was qui t e c l ea r in my Apri l 29 th l e t t e r to him.

12 I would a l so poin t out to the Cour t t h a t pro se

13 l i t i g a n t s are not held to the same s t r i n g e n t

14 requi rement as a t to rneys because they h a v e n t gone

15 to lawschool

and t h e y r enot

members o f t h e Bar

16 and I t h ink t h a t t h i s l e t t e r meets t he

17 requ i rements o f a pro se l i t i g a n t .

18 THE COURT: Al l r i g h t , s i r . t makes fo r an

19 i n t e r e s t i n g i s sue .

2 MR GILLESPIE: Okay. And as fo r t he - I

21 t h ink you sa id something about 15 c e n t s a page o r

22 someone sa id t h a t -

2J THE COURT: Well you can t a l k about t h a t

24 out s ide the cour t room.

25 MR GILLESPIE: - t h a t s what t h e law l i b r a ry

Page 19: TRANSCRIPT Judge Nielsen 3.30pm Jun 28 2006 Discovery

8/13/2019 TRANSCRIPT Judge Nielsen 3.30pm Jun 28 2006 Discovery

http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/transcript-judge-nielsen-330pm-jun-28-2006-discovery 19/28

19

charges . I would seek the maximum under Flor ida

2 law I th ink it s a d o l l a r a page.

3THE COURT: It s a

d o l l a r fo r the c l e rk o f the

4 cour t , it s not going to be an amount t h a t I m

5 going to approve.

6 MR GILLESPIE: Okay.

7 THE COURT: Or f ind to be reasonab le .

8 Legi s l a tu re apparen t ly has found it to be

9 reasonab le for t h e c l e rk to charge t ha t , but

1 t h a t s charg ing fo r l abor and t h e s e r v i ce s o f the

c l e rk of the cour t . I ll not ru le on t ha t ,

12 whether it s reasonab le o r not .

13 MR GILLESPIE: Okay.

14 MR RODEMS: Your Honor we do have a summary

1 s t15 judgment hear ing scheduled on August and we

16 would j u s t ask t h a t t h a t be con t inued u n t i l we can

17 complete discovery . And I have the case law on

18 t h a t i s s u e a l so .

9 THE COURT: Well Mr. G i l l e s p i e , do you want

2 agree to t ha t o r r e se t t h i s i s sue?

21 MR GILLESPIE: No w e l l r e s e t t h a t because

22 t h i s i s n t even a mat t e r fo r the Uniform Discovery

23 Motion Calendar and

24 THE COURT: I m so r ry ?

25 MR GILLESPIE: - - we can r e se t t ha t .

Page 20: TRANSCRIPT Judge Nielsen 3.30pm Jun 28 2006 Discovery

8/13/2019 TRANSCRIPT Judge Nielsen 3.30pm Jun 28 2006 Discovery

http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/transcript-judge-nielsen-330pm-jun-28-2006-discovery 20/28

20

THE COURT: On the summary judgment? You re

agreeing to the re se t t ing of t ha t?

3 MR GILLESPIE: No I m not agreeing .

4 THE COURT: All r igh t . So your motion w i l l be

5 r e se t .

6 MR RODEMS: On the cont inuance of the summary

7 judgment, I need to rese t i t ?

8 THE COURT: That s cor rec t .

9 MR RODEMS:Yes, s i r .

Wese t

t

today

1 because the j ud i c i a l ass i s t an t advised t ha t we

should do the d i scovery and t ha t a t the same t ime.

12 Is there a - i s t okay to se t the cont inuance of

13 the summary judgment on the t r a d i t i o n a l or the

14 customary UM document -

15 THE COURT: I th ink you can probably do tha t .

16 MR RODEMS: Yes, s i r .

17 THE COURT: That s f ive minutes per s ide .

18 MR RODEMS: Okay. And t h a t s in the morning.

19 Mr. Gil lesp ie has had problems with t ha t before .

20 As long as I m able to schedule a hear ing pr i o r to

21 August p I o n t h i s , I m f ine but , obvious ly , i f

22 the Court were to ru le t ha t we were not to get a

23 cont inuance, I would need t ime to complete the

24 discovery. So, i f Mr. Gi l l esp ie can coopera te

25 with me in ge t t ing a hear ing scheduled with in the

Page 21: TRANSCRIPT Judge Nielsen 3.30pm Jun 28 2006 Discovery

8/13/2019 TRANSCRIPT Judge Nielsen 3.30pm Jun 28 2006 Discovery

http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/transcript-judge-nielsen-330pm-jun-28-2006-discovery 21/28

21

next two weeks I t h ink it would be f ine .

THE COURT: Well my j ud i c i a l a s s i s t a n t has

3 l e f t fo r the day. We are not here nex t week so

4 t ha t l i m i t s your t ime s ubs t a n t i a l l y . And if you

5 t h ink you need add i t iona l t ime beyond 10

6 minutes -

7 MR RODEMS: I d o n t th ink so.

8 THE COURT: - I would mention it to her and

w e l l t r y to accommodate t h a t sometime in the next

1 few weeks.

MR RODEMS: Yes s i r . Okay. And i s it a l l

12 r i g h t i f I prepare the proposed orde r , Your Honor?

13 THE COURT: Yes s i r .

14 MR RODEMS: Okay. And of course , I ll

15 t r ansmi t t ha t to Mr. Gil lesp ie be fore br ing ing it

16 to the Court . And was the 20 days based on -

17 THE COURT: Date of the orde r .

18 MR RODEMS: - date of the order? Yes s i r .

19 Thank you fo r your t ime Judge.

20 MR GILLESPIE: Thank you Judge. And Your

21 Honor would you ask t ha t Mr. Rodems l eave the

22 area . The l a s t t ime he l e f t , he was t au n t i n g me

3 in the hal lway and I d o n t want t ha t to happen

24 today.

5 THE COURT: Well you can s t ay nex t to my

Page 22: TRANSCRIPT Judge Nielsen 3.30pm Jun 28 2006 Discovery

8/13/2019 TRANSCRIPT Judge Nielsen 3.30pm Jun 28 2006 Discovery

http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/transcript-judge-nielsen-330pm-jun-28-2006-discovery 22/28

22

ba i l i f f un t i l he goes home and then you can decide

what you want to do, s i r

3 MRGILLESPIE: Thank you.

MR RODEMS: Good day, Your Honor.

5 Hearing concluded)

6

7

8

9

1

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

4

5

Page 23: TRANSCRIPT Judge Nielsen 3.30pm Jun 28 2006 Discovery

8/13/2019 TRANSCRIPT Judge Nielsen 3.30pm Jun 28 2006 Discovery

http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/transcript-judge-nielsen-330pm-jun-28-2006-discovery 23/28

23

C-E-R-T-I-F-I-C-A-T-E

STATE OF FLORIDA

COUNTY OF HILLSBOROUGH

I , WILLIAM HERRMANN Court Reporter fo r the

Circui t Court of the Thi r teenth Jud ic ia l Circui t of the

Sta te of F lor ida , in and for Hillsborough County,

DO HEREBY CERTIFY, t ha t I was author ized to and did ,

through the County of Hil lsborough, r epor t in shor thand the

proceedings and evidence in the above-s ty led cause, as

s t a t ed in the capt ion here to , and tha t the fo rego ing pages,

numbered 1 to 22 inc lus ive , c o n s t i t u t e a t r ue and c o r re c t

t r a n s c r i p t i o n of my s tenograph ic repor t o f sa i d proceedings

and evidence.

IN WITNESS WHEREOF I have hereunto s e t my hand in the

City of Tampa, County of Hil lsborough, Sta te of Flor ida t h i s

5th day of Ju ly , 2006.

WILLIAM HERRMANN Court Reporte r ,

By w . / L . . ~  Will iam Herrmann

Ber ryh i l l Assoc ia tes , Inc .

Page 24: TRANSCRIPT Judge Nielsen 3.30pm Jun 28 2006 Discovery

8/13/2019 TRANSCRIPT Judge Nielsen 3.30pm Jun 28 2006 Discovery

http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/transcript-judge-nielsen-330pm-jun-28-2006-discovery 24/28

  4th[1]8:11 ..................2 [1]3:3

appellate [1]6:19

applicable [2] 5:1 18:

1applies [1]14:7

apply [1]14:12

books [1]12:9

bottom [1]11 :21

breach [1]9:13

bringing [4]14:3,5 16:

1921 :15brought [1]13:14

{[1]1:12 5

5th [2]4:17 23:160

05CA7205 [1]1:5 8

1 8092 [1]2:7

1 [1]23:11 813-229-8225 [1]1 :25 appropriate [4]13:16, C

1,000 [1]13:201.280(b)(5 [1]6:23

1.340 [1]7:1

836 [1]5:49

9:00 [1]8:11

1814:1316:22approve [1]19:5

April [4]5:14 6:211:

2418:11area [2] 8:8 21 :22argue [1]14:4

argument [1]12:10

arrangements [1]15:

19Ashley [1]2:4

asserted [2]12:2 16:

15assessment [2]16:11

17:25assistant [2] 20: 10 21:

2Associates [2]1 :2423:20

attached [3] 6:6 8:6 9:

6attendance [1]11:7

attorney [1]10:23

attorney s [2]6:1716:

19attorney-client [1]10:

1

attorneys [1]18:14August [4]7:1917:6

19:1520:21authorized [1]23:7

available [3]7:415:4

17:12

C-E-R-T-I-F-I-C-A-T-E[1]23:1

Calendar [1]19:23

cannot [1]6:21

caption [1]23:10

Case [12]1:54:25:1

9:1210:312:1213:1,

14,1718:1,219:17

cases [3]5:3,7 10:12

t e g o ~  [2] 5:23,25cause [ ]23:9

cents [3]13:20,21 18:

21

certainly [2]5:19 7:16

Certificate [1]3:6

CERTIFY [1]23:7

chambers [1]11:17

charge [2]13:1919:9

charges [1]19:1

charginR [1]19:10

check [1 18:6choose [1]12:21

Chris [1]4:13

CHRISTOPHER [1]2:

2

CIRCUIT [5]1:1,2,1523:5,5

City [1]23:15

CIVIL [5]1:36:237:1

12:2016:8

claim [1]16:13

claims [1]5:13

clarification [1]14:7

1.340(c [3]7:11 10:9

14:121.350 [1] 5:2010 [1]21:5

107 [1]5:5

10th [1]10:17

115th [1]2:7

11th [1]4:10

12th [1]10:18

1369 [1]5:6

14th [1]10:1515 [3]13:20,21 18:2115th [5]6:11 8:19,249:1 12:317th [1] 6:5

1st [5]7:2010:1617:

719:1520:21

A

a.m[1]8:11

able [1] 20:20above-styled [1]23:9

acceptable [1]14:21accommodate [1]21:

9accordance [1]16:8

Ace [1]10:13

additional [1] 21:5

address [3]7:25 8:713:10

advised [1]20:10advising [1]4:18

afternoon [1] 8:4

Ageny [1]5:4

ago [7 4:21 5:107:15

9:1112:813:6,7

agree [2]16:21 19:20

agreeing [2] 20:2,3agreement [1]15:6

ahead [1]4:12

allegation [1]11:12

allow [1]16:21allowed [1]11:6

already [2]7:1210:10

alternative [3]6:8 8:

1714:19

America [1] 5:2

2

20 [3]17:10,15 21:162000 [2]10:17,182001 [2]10:15,162006 [8]1:184:15,17,

21 5:146:11 8:11 23:

1620th [1]17:16

2100 [1]2:4

21st [1]4:2122 [1]23:1128[1]1:18

28th [1]4:14 American [1]5:6 B

29th [4]5:14 6:211: amount [2]16:22 19: bailiff [5] 8:14 9:23

2418:11 4Amscott [1]10:13Amscott s [1]10:22

anothed2] 10:17,18answer [2] 8:22 12:16

answers [6] 6:13,25 7:68:2310:1212:13

Anthony [1]11:4

apparently [1]19:8

appeal [2]17:23 18:9appear [1]8:12

APPEARANCES [1]2:

1

Appearances..............

15:20,2222:1Bad1] 18:15barely [1]5:10

BARKER [3]1:8 2:3 4:

4

based [2]17:25 21:16basis [1]7:20

bear [1]10:3

behavior [1]11 :22believe [5]4:9 6:18

14:1517:618:9

Berryhill [2]1 :24 23:20between [1]15:18

beyond [1]21:5

clear [1]18:11

clerk [3]19:3,9,11closed [2]6:1,11co [1]14:25

co-defendant [1]14:

25come [2]8:10,15

comes [1]14:8

comma [2] 6: 10 10comments [1]11:8

companr [1]5:1Compel 5]4:78:21,

259:1,5

o m p l l i n ~  [1]6:15

complete 2]19:17

3

3 [2]6:6 8:73:30 [1]1:19

30 [1]12:2130th [1]10:16

33602 [1]2:5

34481 [1] 2:8352 [1]5:5

398 [1]5:3

4

4:39 [1]16:25

400 [1]2:4

402 [1]5:6

Sheet 1 complete

Page 25: TRANSCRIPT Judge Nielsen 3.30pm Jun 28 2006 Discovery

8/13/2019 TRANSCRIPT Judge Nielsen 3.30pm Jun 28 2006 Discovery

http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/transcript-judge-nielsen-330pm-jun-28-2006-discovery 25/28

20:23 day [4]17:1621:322: essence [1] 16:10 6 4:3,16,18 5: 3 8:3,complied [1]12:24 423:16 even [1]19:22 410:2511:2,4,1212:

comply [3] 5:20 14:20 days [4]12:21 17:10, event [1]18:4 19,2513:8,1514:1,

17:8 1521:16 everybody [1]14:8 10,1217:1,10,12,18,concluded [1] 22:5 debate [ ] 6:   8 e v e r y t h i n ~   [1]10:19 22 18:2,8,20,25 19:6,constitute [1] 23:   decide [2]15: 22: 1 evidence 2] 23:9,13 13,19,21,2520:3,19,constructive [1] 9:2 decision [1]17:24 exceed [1] 13:20 24 21:15,20 22:3

contain [1] 5:18 decisions [1] 16:4 except [1] 17:21 give [1] 12:1Continuance [6] 12:5, defendant [1] 14:25 excuse [1] 13:5 got [2] :2012:14

617:320:6.12,23 defendant s [3]4:7 8: Exhibit [2] 6:6 8:7 granted [1] 16:20

continue [3] 4:8 7:19 5,9 exists [1]15:1 guess [3]11 :20 17:7

11:9 Defendants [2] 1:  4: extent [1] 5:10 18:3continued [2]11:12 4 F H19:16

continues [1] 11:18

contract [1] 9:14

contrary [1]16:5

conversation [1] 11:

5COOK [5]1:8,10 2:3

4:4,4cooperate [1] 20:24copies [6] 5:2 6:9 8:

189:1913:2215:6copy [1]9:21

cordial [1] 11:22corporation [1]1:9

correct [2]20:8 23:11cost [3]15:7.14,19COUNTY [16]1:2,16

9:2013:13,15,1715:

9,11,12,16,1716:223:3,6,8.15course [4]4:24 5:2414:1421:14

COURT [56]1:1,214:

2,5,11 7:10,238:39:

10,1510:8,2411:1,3,1013:9,2414:2,11

15:22 16:4,13,20,25

17:5,10,14,20,24,2518:5,6,12,18,2319:3,4,7,11,19,2420:1,4,8,15,17,2221:2,8,13,16,17,2523:4,5,17

Court s [1]17:8

Courthouse [1] 1:16courtroom [3]15:23,2418:24

courts [1]6:19

covers [1]16:24

customary [1]20:14

deficient [1] 7:17demanding [1] 8:10

d e p e n d i n ~   [ ] 17:14depose [ 10:22

deposition [2] 10:15,

7

describe [ ] 16:10

directly [1]15:2Discovery [18] 4:7,25

5:87:21 8: 9:2510:

2,6,7,8,1412:11,1713:219:17,2220:11,24

discuss [1]17:8

DIVISION [2]1 :3,6doctor-patient [1]10:

5document [3]16:10,

1420:14

documents [3]5:169:

2210:14

dollar [2]19:2,3Don [1]5:4

done [1] 15:8Drive [1] 2:4due [1]8:13

duration [1]11:7

during [1]9:12

facilities [1] 9:21facility [1] 9:23

failinr [1] 13:5faith ] 4:20far [2] 6:24 12:10feel [1] 10:18fees [2]6:1716:19

few [1] 21:10file [4] 8:20,25 12:4,6filed [4]6:7 8:25 12:4

13:25i n l ~  [1] 4:20

find [ ]7:614:1519:

7fine [3]13:23 20:21

21:1finish [1]14:2

first [3]4:6 7:1011:

five [4]7:14,16 9:10

20:17FL [1]2:5

FLORIDA [12]1:2,9,

17,232:86:23,2512:

1919:123:2,6,15

followed [1]11:18

following [1]12:19

foregoing [1]23:10

forth [1]17:   3

found [1]19:8

four [3]7:14,16 9:10frame [1]17:8

fraud [1]9:13

fulfill [1] 6:4

hallwar [1] 2 :23hand [ ] 23:14happen [3]6:12,13

21:23happened [2] 7:15 9:

2

happr [1] 13:21

hear ] 17:19hearing [14]4:8 7:24

11:1712:8,2313:17

14:915:21,2316:23

19:1520:20,2522:5

held [1]18:13

HEREBY [1]23:7

hereto [1]23:10

hereunto [1]23:14

Herrmann [4]1 :2023:

4,17,19Hill [1]5:6

HILLSBOROUGH

[14]1:2,1613:13,15,1715:9,10,12,1716:

2 23:3,6,8,15holds [1] 13:1

home [1]22:1

Honor [12] 4:3,6,13 5:

3 6:15 7:2 16:24 17:219:1421:12,21 22:4

Honorable [1]1:14

however [1]5:17

E

e-mail [1]4:18

each [3]4:24 5:22 8:7effort [1]4:20

Either [3]12:315:3

16:21else s [1]14:24Emmanuel [2]10:24

:end [1]7:24

ended [1]7:14

enough [1]18:4

entitled [4]9:810:19

12:11,24ESQUIRE [1] 2:2

I

idea [2]7:1611:19

immunity [1] 11:20

Inc [3]1 :24 5:4 23:20including [1]5:1

inclusive [1] 23:INDEX [1]3:1

Index......................................3 [1]3:4

indicated [1] 10:22

inspect [1]14:17

Instead [1] 7:7

G

gathed1] 12:13gave [1]8:22

Gee [1]16:1

gets [4]14:4,5,6 17:

5getting [1]20:25

GILLESPIE [39]1:4 2:

D

DATE [5]1:1817:16,

1721:17,18

David [1]16:1

Sheet 2 complete - Instead

Page 26: TRANSCRIPT Judge Nielsen 3.30pm Jun 28 2006 Discovery

8/13/2019 TRANSCRIPT Judge Nielsen 3.30pm Jun 28 2006 Discovery

http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/transcript-judge-nielsen-330pm-jun-28-2006-discovery 26/28

insurance [1] 5:1 18:11,16 Nielsen [1]1:14 outside [1]18:24

intends [1]10:22 Library [3]9:20,21 18: Nor th [2] 2:4 5:2 over [2]14:617:15

interesting [1]18: 19 25 Notary [1]1 :22 overdue [1]4:19

interlocutory [2]17: limit [1]9:16 noted [1] 9:7 overruled [1]13:25

22 18:9 limits [1] 21:4 nothing [4]9:11 10:3 overruling [3]17: 18

interrogatories [9] 4: line [1]11:21 11:22,25 19,2015,19,226:16,247:7 litigant [2]2:618:17 notice [1] 9:20 own [2]15:19 17:25

8:2210:1213:7 litigants [1]18:13 notified [1]18:10 Pi n t e r r o ~ t o r y   [1]6:13

invoke [1] 9:25invoked [1] 10:4involve [1] 9: 13

isn t [1] 19:22issue [6] 13:10 16:18,

2318:1919:18,20

issues [1]8:1

item [2]5:22,25

items [3] 6:9 8:19 9:7

itself 1] 5: 19

location [3]13:10 14:

1815:10

log [2]6:22 16:7long [1]20:20look [1]12:20Loop [1] 2:7

November [1]10:16

Noya phonetic [1] 5:

2number [3]4:246:17,

24numbered [1]23:11

P-U-L-L-U-M [1] 5:5P.A [1] 1:8p.m [1]1:19

PA [1]2:3

PAGE [4] 3:213:20

18:21 19:2pages [2]13:21 23:10parameters [1]17:12

Pardon [2]10:2511:3

paren [1]7:1

part [4]5:25,2511:22

17:3parties [3] 14:8 15:7

M

made [3]5:25 6:1216:

12mailing [3]6:98:18

17:13manner [2]5:1514:

20

objected [3]8:1110:

718:10

objecting [2]5:14 6:

20objection [6]4:24 5:

246:108:19,2313:

J

John [1]10:23

Judge [11]1:15 8:4, March [1]4:14 22 16:211411:1112:1813:8 Marion [2] 9:20 15:16 objections [14] 4:25 party [10]14:3,4,5,17

14:1,1017:2321:19, matterl2] 11:619:22 5:8,11,226:2,16,17 15:2,14,16,18,2216:20 matters [2]9:12 12: 12:413:1,2416:6,6 12

judges [1]15:25 12 17:19,20 past [1] 7:9Judgmen t [9]4:9 7: maximum [1]19:1 obligation [1]12:14 pay [1]13:21

2011:917:4,519:15 medical [1]10:3 obviously [3]13:16 per [1]20:17

20:1,7,13 meets [1]18:16 17:720:21 perfectly [1]13:23

JUDICIAL [5] 1: 1 11: members [1] 18:15 Ocala [2] 2:8 9: 17 period [1]9:14

2020:1021:223:5 mention [1] 21:8 October [2] 10:16,17 permits [1] 14:17July [1]23:16 minute [1]17:1 offer [1]9:19 persons [1]11:7

June [4]1:18 4:14,21 minutes [2]20:17 21: offered [3]8:17,17 9: pertinent [1] 9: 11

10:18 6miss [1]16:16moment [1]13:9

months [1]12:22

m o r n i n ~  [1]20:18most [1 15:25motion [21]4:6,7,86:

77:208:6,21,259:1,

511:912:5,614:4,5

16:16,1917:3,419:2320:4

Mott [1] 5:4

moved [1]7:19

must [5]15:216:6,7,1017:17

N

4o f f e r i n ~  [1] 9:3office [ ]8:10,13,15Okay [8]18:8,20 19:6,

1320:12,1821:11,14one [4]11:1412:214:

2217:1only [3] 7:3 15:116:

12operates [1]14:3

oPPosinR [1] 14:17option [3 7:2 10:9 14:23

options [1]14:23orderl13] 6:14 8:7 9:

1512:713:117:9,15,

16,1718:521:12,17,18

o r i n ~   [1]14:14

other [ 8:20,24 15:15,2516:12

out [2] 7:10 18:12outrageous [1] 8:16

Phrasinr [1]11 :24place [1 11:6

Plaintiff [4]1:513:12

14:2515:1

plaintiffs [2]4:8 8:6

Pleadinr [1] 11:19point [3 7:5,1018:12

policy [3]15:21,24,25portion [1] 5:20

possession [5]10:1112:11 14:14,2415:5

postmarked [1] 17:17preemptive [1] 11:5

preference [1] 16:1prepare [1]21:12

present [4]9:2315:

20,2318:3

preserving [1]16:5

prior [3] 9:915:620:

20privilege [9]6:18,22

10:1,516:3,7,14,1517:21

K

kept [6] 9:1714:14,18,

19,2315:5

n o w n ~ [1]12:8

knows ] 7:2 9: 13

L

labor [1]19:10

Large [1] 1:23last [2] 7: 15 21 :22late [1] 12:4launch [1] 5:22

law [10] 5:1 9:20,2113:1 18:1,2,15,2519:2,17lawsuit [2]10:13,13lawsuits [1] 10:15leave [1] 21:21left [2] 21 :3,22Legislature [1] 19:8letter [11] 5: 14 17 186:2,3,6 9:5 11 :5,24

nature [1] 16:14need [3] 20:7,23 21:5NEIL [2] 1:4 2:6neutral [1]15:17never [2] 8:20 11:17

next [4]21:1,3,9,25

heet 3 Insurance - privilege

Page 27: TRANSCRIPT Judge Nielsen 3.30pm Jun 28 2006 Discovery

8/13/2019 TRANSCRIPT Judge Nielsen 3.30pm Jun 28 2006 Discovery

http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/transcript-judge-nielsen-330pm-jun-28-2006-discovery 27/28

privileqes [1] 6:20 record [1]11:24 34:3,6,13,148:2 9:9 1621:11,13,1822:2

pro [5]2:6 14:7 15:22 record-keeping [1] 18,2210:2111:10,11 site [1]15:17

18:12 17 14:15 13:9 1416:17 18 24 situation [2]12:18 13:probably [2]18:8 20: records [21]7:3 4 6 8 17:2,618:1019:14 11

15 9:1610:3 9 10 10 11 20:6 9 16 1821:7 11 slam [1]11:16

problem [3] 5:23 7:3 11:2312:2,10,1313: 14 18 21 22:4 So.2d [3] 5:4 5 6

13:4 4 18 2014:13 18 23 room [3]14:9 15:21 someone [2]14:24

problems [1]20:19 15:4 24 18:22Procedure [7] 6:23 7: regard [2]7:188:21 Rule [11]5:20 6:23 sometime [1]21:9

1,1112:2013:3,23 regarding [1]5:21 257:11 10:912:25 sorry [2]17:2 19:24

16:8 regardless [1]6:21 14:11,16,1619:1120: special [1]13:3

PROCEEDINGS [4]1: rejected [1]9:18 22 specifically [2]10:11

134:123:9,12 rejection [1] 9:3 rules [6]5:2412:19, 16:7

Proceedings............... rely [1]10:8 21,2416:818:6 specified [1]6:1

.................4 [1]3:5 relying [1]6:25 ruling [2]14:2 18:1 stand [1]5:7

produce [7] 7:2 3 10: repeat [1]11:18 RYAN [1]2:2 State [4]1 :2323:2,6,

15stated [2]16:6 23:10

stay [2]18:4 21 :25

stenographic [1] 23:

12still [1]6:19

stringent [1]18:13

sub [1]7:1

sUbject [6] 6: 10 8: 19

2311:515:616:4

s U b s t a n t i a l l ~  [1] 21:4

sufficiencr 1]16:13

sufficient 1]17:11

sufficiently [1]16:11

suggest [1]14:21

Suite [1]2:4

Summary [9]4:9 7:20

11:917:4,519:1420:1 6 13

SUPf0rt [1] 5:9SW 1]2:7

sway [1]16:5

912:1513:315:8,11 reply [2]8:8 14:6 Sproduced [5]5:169:

1713:13,1916:7

Production [14]4:16,

235:15,196:98:5,8,910:1413:6,10,11

14:1115:3

Productions [1]5:21

prohibit [1]10:8

prohibited [2]10:2,6

promise [1]6:12

promised [1]6:3

proper [2]7:11 12:16proposed [1]21:12

proposition [1]5:7

Protection [4]8:7 9:6

1611:5

Protective [1]12:7provide [3] 6:22 8:23

13:2

provided [2]7:21 15:

13

report [2] 23:8 12

REPORTER [4]1:20,

21 23:4 17

~ [ o ~ ~ r ....................2

representation [2]7:

149:9

r e p r e s e n t i n ~  [1] 7:9Request [13 4:15 23

5: 15 19 21 6:88:5,9,

12,1811:2513:615:

3requested [5]6:107:

228:199:813:19

requestinR [1]15:15

requests 1]12:1

required [2] 6:22 9:23requirement [1]18:14

requirements [1]18:

17requires [1]5:21

same [4]6:12 8:22 18:

1320:11

S a Y i n ~  [1]12:20

says ]5:24 6:5 25 7:812:13

schedule [1]20:20

scheduled [3]17:6

19:1520:25

school [1]18:15

se [5]2:6 14:8 15:22

18:12 17second [2]7:13 17:3

secure [1]9:22

security [6]11:6 15:

13 14 15 18 19see [1]4:11

seek [1]19:1seeking [2]6:14 12:

14select [1]15:10

send [6]5:17 6:4 9:19Public [1]1:22 research [1]14:16

11:2312:213:22 TPullum(phonetic [1]

5:5

reset [5]19:20 21 25

20:5 7resettiny [1]20:2

resolve 1] 4:20respond [11] 6:8 15 7:

138:5,18,2412:21,

2213:5,815:3

responded [2]8:20 9:4responding [2]14:4

15:2response [5]4:17,23

7:712:1714:5

responses [6] 4:22 5:

96:47:179:614:20

Richard [1]1:14

RODEMS [33]1:8 2:2

sent [2]4:175:13

separate [1]16:22

served [3]4:9,15 5:9

services [1]19:10

set [6]13:316:2217:

520:9,1223:14

settlement [2]10:16,

18several [1]12:22

shall [1]6:1

Sheriff [1]16:1

shorthand [1]23:8

shown [1]17:17

side [1]20:17

since [1]13:16

sirl13] 4:11 8:2 14:2

316:1818:7,1820:9,

Tampa [3]1:172:5

23:15

taunting [1] 21 :22telephone [1]11:15

terms [1]14:16

there s [8]5:10 6:18

11:13,13,21,2515:20,

22therefore [1] 9:4

THIRTEENTH [2]1:1

23:5

threat [2]11:13,14

threatened [1]11:14

threats [1]8:13

three [1]5:6

timely [2] 6:20 18:3

today [6]4:5 6:7 14

Q

quite [1]18:11

quote [5] 5:24 6:1 5 7

11

R

raised [1] 6: 17raising [1]16:3

reading [1]6:5

reason [2]8:13 15:20

reasonable [3]19:7,9,

12receive [1]4:17

received [1]4:22

recite [1]16:9

Sheet 4 pnvlleges - today

Page 28: TRANSCRIPT Judge Nielsen 3.30pm Jun 28 2006 Discovery

8/13/2019 TRANSCRIPT Judge Nielsen 3.30pm Jun 28 2006 Discovery

http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/transcript-judge-nielsen-330pm-jun-28-2006-discovery 28/28

17:9 20:9 21 :24 4:423:4,17,19took [1]9:2 within [1] 20:25traditional [1] 20: 13 without [1] 6:16

TRANSCRIPT [1]1: WITNESS [1] 23:14

13 words [1] 15:15

transcription [1] 23: y12 years [3] 7:15,16 9:10

transmit [1] 21: 15true [3]5:17 9:1123:

11try [2] 4:20 21:9

two [3] 7:10 10:12 21:

1typically [1] 15:8

U

UMC [1] 20:14

undeclared [1] 7:6

under [4] 4:25 7:11

10:919:1

understand [1] 14:9Uniform [1] 19:22

unless [1] 14:6

unproduced [1] 7:5

until [6]12:8 22 13:6,719:1622:1

untimely [6] 4:21,25

5:8 1113:1 25

up [3] 4:5 7:2411:16

V

view [2] 9:18,19volume [1] 15:7vs[1]1:7

Wwaived [4] 4:25 5:8,

126:20

wall [1]11 :17

wanted [1] 5: 16

wants [4] 9:1813:19

15:13,18way [4] 7:13 9:8 12:3

14:3week [7] 4:20 5:1012:

8 2213:6 721:3

weeks [2] 21:1,10

whatever [1] 7:15

whatsoever [1] 10:4whenever [1] 15:22WHEREOF [1] 23:14wherever [1] 15:4

whether [5]6:19,2114:2415:1619:12

will [10]6:8 8:12,23

14:12 1515:8 1416:

2018:420:4

WILLIAM [6] 1:10,20