Transcending this paradigm

29
CURRENT PARADIGM & ITS DOMINANT SYSTEM OF IDEAS NEW IDEAS EVOLUTION/PROGRESS OF KNOWLEDGE 1 www.npcCONVERGENCE.net

description

Most of the people have the tendency to believe that the great changes in the world are things that belong only to books of history. The other face of this, is that they also tend to project into the future the particular conditions / situations that are surrounding them today. For example, young people of 30-35 years old with little kids, that believe that in 30 years their children will be trying to jump from one job to a better one with a higher salary in an important company. Also, that they will have their own modern cars, that will be paying a credit for a nice house in a beautiful neighborhood and will be having a “prosperous future” because they’ll have a university degree, etc. Well, this was probably very true in their parents generation, less true in their generation and highly improbable to be true in their children’s generation.

Transcript of Transcending this paradigm

Page 1: Transcending this paradigm

CURRENT PARADIGM & ITS DOMINANT SYSTEM 

OF IDEASNEW IDEAS

EVOLUTION/PROGRESS OF KNOWLEDGE

1www.npcCONVERGENCE.net

Page 2: Transcending this paradigm

$People &

environment2

www.npcCONVERGENCE.net

Page 3: Transcending this paradigm

RESULTANT FORCES WITH CURRENT INCENTIVES/RULES

PROFITCOMPETITIONPROPERTY

SUSTAINABILITYREAL TRUST & COOPERATIONEQUITYPEACEREAL HUMAN DEVELOPMENT

“FREE MARKET”INEVITABLE PROPENSITY TOWARDS MONOPOLY

CLASSICAL VISION OF GOVERNMENTS TAKING CARE OF THE MARKET 

“FAILURES”‐

3www.npcCONVERGENCE.net

Page 5: Transcending this paradigm

People &

EnvironmentScience & Technology

5www.npcCONVERGENCE.net

Page 6: Transcending this paradigm

TRANSCEND METHOD

100% A

100% B

“NEW” TRANSCENDENTAL 

SITUATION

NO HUMANITY0% A – 0 % B

34

51

2

MOST USUAL AREA OF 

POSSIBILITIES “FOR CHANGE” WITH TYPICAL DICHOTOMIC SITUATIONS

COMPROMISE 50% A ‐ 50% B

TRANSITION TO

6www.npcCONVERGENCE.net

Page 7: Transcending this paradigm

HUMAN BEHAVIOR

NATURE(INNATE‐

GENETICALLY DETERMINED)

NURTURE(LEARNED‐ENVIRONMENTALLY 

CONDITIONED )

(CO) EVOLUTION OF HUMAN BEHAVIORDEPENDING ON THE RELATION WITH THE 

ENVIRONMENT 

NO HUMANITY

34

51

2 COMPROMISE

DESCARTES

HOBBES/LOCKE7

www.npcCONVERGENCE.net

Page 8: Transcending this paradigm

USE OF MONEY or BARTER

USE OF MONEY

BARTER

NO MONEY FREE ACCESS TO USEFOR ALL PEOPLE

NO HUMANITY

34

51

2

PARTIAL INDEPENDENCY OF 

MONEY

8www.npcCONVERGENCE.net

Page 9: Transcending this paradigm

PRIVATE or PUBLIC PROPERTY

PRIVATE PROPERTY

PUBLIC PROPERTY (STATE)

WHOLE HUMAN COMMUNITY’S 

HERITAGE

NO HUMANITY

34

51

2 PRIVATE/PUBLIC

9www.npcCONVERGENCE.net

Page 10: Transcending this paradigm

OWNERSHIP or HIRE – RENT(possession)

OWNERSHIP

HIRE ‐ RENT

HUMAN HERITAGEFREE ACCESS TO USE

FOR ALL

NO HUMANITY

34

51

2 INTERMEDIATE SITUATIONS

10www.npcCONVERGENCE.net

Page 11: Transcending this paradigm

FORMS OF ECONOMIC INTERACTION

“PERFECT COMPETITION”

MONOPOLY

PERFECT COOPERATION

NO HUMANITY

34

51

2 OLIGOPOLY, OLIGOPSONY, MONOPOLISTIC COMPETITION

11www.npcCONVERGENCE.net

Page 12: Transcending this paradigm

PROFIT or CHARITY (human moUvaUon)

PROFIT MAXIMIZATION

CHARITY/AID

SATISFACTION OF ALL REAL 

NEEDS OF ALL PEOPLE

NO HUMANITY

34

51

2 CORPORATIVE SOCIAL “RESPONSIBILITY” 

PROGRAMS

12www.npcCONVERGENCE.net

Page 13: Transcending this paradigm

TRADE or LOCAL PRODUCTION(way of meeUng saUsfactors with people)

TRADE(INTERNATIONAL)

LOCAL/NATIONAL PRODUCTION

FREE ACCESS TO SATISFACTORS &

REAL FREE MOBILITY OF 

PEOPLE

NO HUMANITY

34

51

2 SITUATION OF MOST OF THE COUNTRIES

13www.npcCONVERGENCE.net

Page 14: Transcending this paradigm

URBAN or RURALURBAN

RURAL

SUBURBAN CONSUMPTION & PRODUCTION

CONVERGENCE (HIGH Efficiency in Distribution)

CONSUMPTION OF FOOD

34

51

2

PRODUCTION OF FOOD

NO HUMANITY

(REGIONAL “BEHAVIOR” related to FOOD)

14www.npcCONVERGENCE.net

Page 15: Transcending this paradigm

MARKET or GOVERNMENT(decisions)

MARKET

NATIONAL GOVERNMENTS (STATE)

SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY

CONCLUSION ARRIVING

(CARRYING CAPACITY)

NO HUMANITY

34

51

2 DECISION MAKINGSITUATION OF MOST OF THE COUNTRIES

15www.npcCONVERGENCE.net

Page 16: Transcending this paradigm

RESOURCE MANAGEMENT

“POWERFUL”GOVERNMENTS

CHAOS – ANARCHY(NO GOVERNMENT) 

CONCLUSION ARRIVING BY 

APPLYING SCIENCE & TECH. TO RESOURCE MANAGEMENT.

(PERSONAL SELF‐GOVERNMENT & CONSENSUS PROCESS)

NO HUMANITY

34

51

2 “LESS POWER‐WEAK” GOVERNMENTS

16www.npcCONVERGENCE.net

Page 17: Transcending this paradigm

MANUAL WORK ‐ AUTOMATIZATION

“POOR” FARMERS - PEASANTS

HIGH-TECH FARMERS

INTERMEDIATE FARMERS

AUTOMATED PRODUCTIONFREE PEOPLE FROM WORK

EMPLOYMENT/WORK

(manual)

34

51

2

AUTOMATIZATION USING MACHINES

NO HUMANITY

17www.npcCONVERGENCE.net

Page 18: Transcending this paradigm

CONSUMPTIONEVER‐

GROWING CYCLICAL 

CONSUMPTION OF “NEW” PRODUCTS

NO CONSUMPTION OF NEW THINGS – REPAIRING 

OLD THINGS

FREE‐ACCESS TO BEST‐QUALITYLONG‐LIFE 100% RECYCLABLE PRODUCTS

NO HUMANITY

34

51

2 TEMPORARY UP‐DATE OR ADAPTATION OF PRE‐EXISTING THINGS 

18www.npcCONVERGENCE.net

Page 19: Transcending this paradigm

ECONOMICAL GOALSINFINITE‐ 

“GROWING” ECONOMY ($)

ECONOMICAL “DEPRESSION” ($)

PERMANENT IMPROVEMENT AND DEVELOPMENT OF LIVING CONDITIONS FOR ALL HUMANS & ALL OTHER FORMS OF LIFE ( RBE )  

NO HUMANITY

34

51

2 “STEADY ECONOMY” ($)

19www.npcCONVERGENCE.net

Page 20: Transcending this paradigm

AVAILABILITY OF SATISFACTORSRESTRICTED ACCESS TO ABUNDANCE 

($)

TOTAL/SEVERE SCARCITY ($)

FREE ACCESS TO SATISFACTORS OF NEEDS & REAL 

ABUNDANCE FOR ALL

NO HUMANITY

34

51

2 RELATIVE ACCESS TO SATISFACTORS ($)

20www.npcCONVERGENCE.net

Page 21: Transcending this paradigm

KNOWLEDGEINDUSTRIAL SYSTEM OF EDUCATION

NON‐FORMALLY EDUCATED

HOLISTIC HUMAN SELF‐REALIZATION 

ORIENTED

NO HUMANITY

34

51

2 SOME ALTERNATIVE APPROACHES

21www.npcCONVERGENCE.net

Page 22: Transcending this paradigm

IDENTITY

FOREIGNER – ALLIEN – 

STRANGER – OUTSIDER 

(TO BE ; ANY OTHER) 

NATIONAL – NATIVE – LOCAL – INSIDER (NOT TO BE ; ANY OTHER) 

HUMAN BEING/ (DOING) –

EARTHLINGS – “CITIZENS” OF THIS 

WORLD 

NO HUMANITY

34

51

2 “PARTICULAR” CASES

22www.npcCONVERGENCE.net

Page 23: Transcending this paradigm

JOB‐JOBLESS

FULL TIME JOB

JOBLESS

SOCIAL ROLES

NO HUMANITY

34

51

2 PART TIME JOB

23www.npcCONVERGENCE.net

Page 24: Transcending this paradigm

PRODUCER or CONSERVATIONIST

PRODUCER(FARMERS)

CONSERVATIONISTS(ECOLOGISTS)

“ENVIRONMENT MANAGERS”

NO HUMANITY

34

51

2 COMPROMISE

24www.npcCONVERGENCE.net

Page 25: Transcending this paradigm

RELATIONSHIP WITH OTHERSAND THE ENVIRONMENT

INDEPENDENCE

DEPENDENCE

INTERDEPENDENCE – INTER-CONNECTIVITY –

SYMBIOTIC CONNECTIONS OF LIFE

NO HUMANITY

34

51

2 COMPROMISE

25www.npcCONVERGENCE.net

Page 26: Transcending this paradigm

DEVELOPMENT

DEVELOPED(ESTABLISHED)

UNDEVELOPED

EMERGENT

NO HUMANITY

34

51

2 DEVELOPING

26www.npcCONVERGENCE.net

Page 27: Transcending this paradigm

EXPECTED RESULTANT FORCES WITH THE UPGRADED INCENTIVES/RULES

+“FREE ACCESS TO SATISFACTORS”

CONCLUSION ARRIVING PROCESS BASED ON “SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY” DEVELOPMENTS 

+ CONSENSUS DECISION MAKING PROCESSES

HIGHEST GOOD FOR ALL PEOPLEREAL COOPERATIONPRIORITY FOCUS ON USE

SUSTAINABILITY OF THE “TOTAL HUMAN ECOSYSTEM”

27www.npcCONVERGENCE.net

Page 28: Transcending this paradigm

Third wave:SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGYINFORMATION/COMMUNICATION

second wave:INDUSTRIAL REVOLUTION

first wave:AGRICULTURAL REVOLUTION

(re)EVOLUTIONof CONSCIOUSNESS

www.npcCONVERGENCE.net