Training Programme for Scheduled Commercial Banks (SCBs ...
Transcript of Training Programme for Scheduled Commercial Banks (SCBs ...
Module 3 June 2015 Page 1
Training Programme for Scheduled Commercial Banks
(SCBs) on Energy Efficiency Financing in India June 2015
Module 3: Business Models for Energy Efficiency
Project Implementation
The presentation has been prepared in association with USAID PACE-D TA Program
Module 3 June 2015 Page 2
• Summary of Implementation Models
• Overview of Performance Contracting
• Performance Contracting Business Models
• Illustrative ESCO Project
• Structure of Energy Services Agreements
• International Perspectives
• Experience in India
• Proposed BEE Funds
Partial Risk Guarantee Fund For Energy Efficiency
Venture Capital Fund For Energy Efficiency
Presentation Outline
Module 3 June 2015 Page 3
• Simple models
Corporate Lending (balance sheet based)
Energy Audit Model
• Performance Contracting Models
Shared Savings Model
Guaranteed Savings Model
Deemed Savings Model
Energy Supply Contracting
Summary of Implementation Models
Module 3 June 2015 Page 4
• Many EE Projects are implemented by the Project Hosts themselves
based on recommendations by energy auditors (individual or firm) for
retrofit or change of energy-using equipment in existing facilities.
• BEE has implemented a program for certification of energy auditors.
• Financial commitments are made by the Project Hosts and the energy
auditor is confined to being a technical advisor.
• Some audit models also include a “success fee” for the auditor based
upon achievement of energy cost savings.
• For the Project Host and the Lender, the EE Project is a normal capital
expenditure eligible for funding under regular lending programs.
Energy Audit Model
Module 3 June 2015 Page 6
Energy Services Business Models
Guaranteed
Savings
Shared Savings
Outsourced Energy
Management
Energy Services Business Models
Deemed Energy Savings
Module 3 June 2015 Page 7
Energy Savings Performance Contracts (ESPCs)
Performance contracts are generally implemented by
energy services companies, commonly known as
ESCOs
Module 3 June 2015 Page 13
• Energy Savings Performance Contracts ESPC) between ESCO and
host facility
• Financing Agreement (FA) between ESCO and financial institution (FI)
• ESPC specifies:
ESCO finances project – generally no investment by host
ESCO receives share of actual measured cost savings
Savings share to ESCO and term of agreement are agreed upon
• FA specifies:
ESCO equity investment, FI debt financing
Interest rate and term of loan
ESCO makes loan repayments from its share of savings
Shared Savings Model
Module 3 June 2015 Page 14
Shared Savings Model
Payment Security Mechanism
Escrow or Trust and Retention
Account (TRA)
Module 3 June 2015 Page 15
• ESPC between ESCO and host facility
• Financing Agreement (FA) between financial institution and host
facility
• ESPC specifies:
ESCO implements project and guarantees cost savings, host pays ESCO
If savings are lower than guarantee, ESCO pays the difference; if higher,
ESCO may get a “bonus” payment
M&V protocol and terms of payment to ESCO are agreed upon
• FA specifies:
Host equity investment, FI debt financing
Interest rate and term of loan
Host makes loan repayments from savings
Guaranteed Savings Model
Module 3 June 2015 Page 16
Guaranteed Savings Model
Payment Security Mechanism
Escrow or TRA account
Module 3 June 2015 Page 17
• ESPC between ESCO and host facility with a fixed price for services
provided.
• Financing Agreement (FA) between ESCO and financial institution
(Similar to Shared Savings Model).
• Agreement between ESCO and government or utility under which
ESCO receives payments based on deemed savings.
• ESPC specifies:
Services provided by ESCO
Fixed payment by host facility for ESCO services
• FA specifies:
ESCO equity investment, FI debt investment
Interest rate and term of loan
ESCO makes loan repayments from host and utility/government payments
Deemed Energy Savings Model
Module 3 June 2015 Page 19
• Also known as Energy Supply Contracting
• Agreement between ESCO and host facility under which ESCO takes
over operation and maintenance of the energy-using equipment in host
facility
• ESCO sells the output (e.g., steam, heating/cooling, lighting) to the
host facility customer at an agreed price (generally fixed over a long
period of time)
• ESCO invests in all equipment upgrades, repairs, etc. to improve
energy efficiency
• Ownership typically remains with the host facility (however, in some
cases, ESCO may assume ownership of equipment).
Outsourced Energy Management Model
Module 3 June 2015 Page 21
No. Description Cost Savings Payback Lifetime
1 Lighting 1 30.0 25.0 1.2 6
2 Lighting 2 40.0 20.0 2.0 10
3 Air conditioning 250.0 75.0 3.3 15
4 Pumps 50.0 20.0 2.5 15
5 VFD on Motors 140.0 45.0 3.1 20
6 Load Management 60.0 30.0 2.0 10
570.0 215.0 2.7 -
150.0
720.0 215.0 3.3
Total
SUMMARY OF EE MEASURES
Project Development Costs
Total Including Proj. Dev.
Illustrative Example of ESCO Project
Module 3 June 2015 Page 22
No. Description Cost Savings Payback
A All 720.0 215.0 3.3
B Exclude A/C 470.0 140.0 3.4
C Exclude A/C and VFD 330.0 95.0 3.5
D Lighting Only 220.0 45.0 4.9
ECONOMICS INCL. PROJECT DEVELOPMENT COSTS
Project Economics
Module 3 June 2015 Page 23
Project Economics
Package
No. Description Cost 1 2 3 ….. 15
A All -720.0 215.0 215.0 215.0 ….. 140.0
B Exclude A/C -470.0 140.0 140.0 140.0 ….. 65.0
C Exclude A/C and VFD -330.0 95.0 95.0 95.0 ….. 20.0
D Lighting Only -220.0 45.0 45.0 45.0 ….. 0.0
No. Package Cost NPV IRR
A All 720.0 $552.52 28%
B Exclude A/C 470.0 $319.65 27%
C Exclude A/C and VFD 330.0 $170.99 25%
D Lighting Only 220.0 ($3.76) 11%
CASH FLOWS
ECONOMIC PARAMETERS
Module 3 June 2015 Page 24
ESCO arranges Bank Financing, Customer puts up required equity
Case Description Cost 1 2 3 ….. 15
A 100 % Equity Financing -720.0 215.0 215.0 215.0 ….. 140.0
B 30% Equity, 70% Debt, 7 year term -216.0 97.5 97.5 97.5 ….. 140.0
C 30% Equity, 70% Debt, 5 year term -216.0 68.2 68.2 68.2 ….. 140.0
D 40% Equity, 60% Debt, 7 year term -288.0 114.3 114.3 114.3 ….. 140.0
No. Package Cost NPV IRR
A 100 % Equity Financing 720.0 552.52 28%
B 30% Equity, 70% Debt, 7 year term 216.0 523.61 47%
C 30% Equity, 70% Debt, 5 year term 216.0 530.01 41%
D 40% Equity, 60% Debt, 7 year term 288.0 527.74 41%
CASH FLOWS
Guaranteed Savings Results
Module 3 June 2015 Page 25
ESCO finances project; Customer agrees to shared savings; Customer puts up zero equity
Case Organization Cost 1 2 3 15
ESCO - 1 Project -216.0 97.5 97.5 97.5 140.0
Customer 0.0 43.0 43.0 43.0 140.0
ESCO -66.0 54.5 54.5 54.5 0.0
ESCO - 2 Project -288.0 114.3 114.3 114.3 140.0
Customer 0.0 53.8 53.8 53.8 140.0
ESCO -188.0 60.5 60.5 60.5 0.0
No. Organization Cost NPV IRR
ESCO - 1 Project 216.0 523.61 47%
Customer 0.0 502.59 N/A
ESCO 66.0 154.95 81%
ESCO - 2 Project 288.0 527.74 41%
Customer 0.0 407.65 N/A
ESCO 188.0 209.37 33%
CASH FLOWS
ESCO Equity 30%, ESCO Share of Savings 80%, Loan Term 7 years, ESA 7 years
ESCO Equity 40%, ESCO Share of Savings 75%, Loan Term 7 years, ESA 10 years
Shared Savings Results
Module 3 June 2015 Page 26
Indicative Structure of ESPC
• Recitals
• Definitions
• Covenants
• Term
• Scope of Work
• Facilities
• Construction
• Operation and Maintenance
• Financing and Ownership of
Assets
• Energy Savings
• Billing and Payment
• Transfer of Financed Assets
• Force Majeure, Events of
Default & Termination
• Dispute Resolution
• Insurance
• Other Clauses in the ESPC
• Technical Matters
Module 3 June 2015 Page 28
ESCO Projects in the U.S.
• ESCO projects have been
a big success in US Govt.
• Key contributors to
success:
strong legislative and
executive backing
umbrella
contracts/simplified
procurement
dedicated support
organization/project
facilitation
Module 3 June 2015 Page 31
• Provided risk guarantees to large number of projects - $49.5
million in guarantees - Default rate was < 0.5%
• Demonstrated low risk & high return of EE projects and
induced banks to substantially increase loan portfolio
• High leveraging of IFC/GEF funds achieved – Total project
investment in excess of $200 million
• Bank lending without PRG exceeded with PRG – In Hungary,
while the projects with guarantees involved about $20 million
in investments , while the non-guaranteed lending was over
$200 million
• Also a large $250 million ESCO contract was signed by a
consortium that included OTP Bank
• Bank lending activity continued after end of IFC program
CEEF Results
Module 3 June 2015 Page 33
Case Studies from India
Case Study 1: Application of Medium Voltage (MV) Variable Flow Drives (VFD) for
Convertor Induced Drift (ID) Fan of SMS-I at JSW Steel Limited
Case Study 2: A K Spintex, textile unit EE project funding under SBI Uptech
Module 3 June 2015 Page 34
• JSW Steel is India’s leading private sector steel producer and among
the world’s most illustrious steel companies.
• Yantra Harvest is leading Energy Saving solution provider in India
using Medium Voltage Drives.
• Yantra Harvest provided complete Turn-Key base solution on ESCO
basis to JSW steel.
• Energy Saving Guarantee was provided by Yantra Harvest @ 250 kW/
heat cycle per fan.
• Entire investment made by Yantra Harvest
• JSW was reaping benefits (energy savings and costs) without
investment.
…contd
Case Study 1:Application of Medium Voltage(MV) Variable Flow Drive (VFD)
for Convertor Induced Drift (ID) Fan of SMS-I at JSW Steel Limited
Module 3 June 2015 Page 35
Particulars Description
Total Investment by
Yantra Harvest
INR 245 Lakhs
Investor Category ESCO
Product / Industry sector Steel Manufacturing – Large Scale
Project Location Torangallu, Karnataka
Pay back period Less than 24 months
Repayment duration to
Yantra Harvest
36 months EMI
Savings in Rupees INR 5.167 Crore in 3 years
Energy Savings achieved
per heat cycle
300 kW/Heat cycle.
Cost and Energy Savings: Application of Medium Voltage(MV) Variable Flow
Drive (VFD) for Convertor Induced Drift (ID) Fan of SMS-I at JSW Steel Ltd.
…..contd
Module 3 June 2015 Page 36
• SBI Uptech has extended a typical project loan with liberalized lending
parameters- higher Debt Equity Ratio (DER) for the EE project, but the
project sponsors’ pre-project financial ratios satisfied conventional
bankability requirements.
• Given the fast payback and the attractive returns on investment, there
is adequate cushion against project construction and technical
performance risks because of the 5-year period of repayment.
• The investment in the EE project does not significantly alter the
financial risk profile of the Project Sponsor.
Case Study 2: A K Spintex, textile unit EE project funding under SBI Uptech
Module 3 June 2015 Page 37
Particulars Description
Type of funding Medium Term Project Loan, direct lending to Project Sponsor
Quantum and Term of loan US$ 141,000, 5 years, moratorium 6 months
Interest rate PLR
Debt/Equity Ratio 2:1
DSCR 2.29
IRR/Pay back period 57%, 8 months
Security Structure Hypothecation of project assets, second charge on all other assets,
personal guarantee of promoters/directors
Basis for project DPR, backed by Energy Audit Report submitted by energy consultant
Annual Savings US $ 217,000 per annum
Savings and Pay back – A K Spintex Textile Unit EE
Project
Module 3 June 2015 Page 38
Slide 34 and 35
Case studies from Yantra Harvest
Slide 36
http://www.docstoc.com/docs/61607558/Commercial-Financing-Alternative-Energy-Projects
User Reference