Tracking(1) K p 2 decay-in-flight BG simulation

13
Tracking(1) K2 decay-in-flight BG simulation K. Horie Osaka University . 1, 2007 RC TREK Collaboration meeting at Saskatchewan

description

Sep. 1, 2007 JPARC TREK Collaboration meeting at Saskatchewan. Tracking(1) K p 2 decay-in-flight BG simulation. K. Horie Osaka University. Simple estimation of K p 2 BG fraction. - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Transcript of Tracking(1) K p 2 decay-in-flight BG simulation

Page 1: Tracking(1) K p 2 decay-in-flight BG simulation

Tracking(1)K2 decay-in-flight BG simulation

K. Horie

Osaka University

Sep. 1, 2007JPARC TREK Collaboration meeting at Saskatchewan

Page 2: Tracking(1) K p 2 decay-in-flight BG simulation

Simple estimation of K2 BG fraction

Fraction of K2 decay-in-flight in the target is BR(K2)/BR(K3) * decay probability ~ * (1. exp (target radius / c

momentum of K2 + 205MeV/c; = 0.84c ~ 100cmtarget radius ~ 10cm1- exp(-10/100) ~ 0.1

The number of K2 decay-in-flight in the target is comparable to the number of K3 events

Page 3: Tracking(1) K p 2 decay-in-flight BG simulation

Target and tracking

Last meeting at KEK

Source of K2 BG(1)scatter in the spectrometer(2)dif in the spectrometer can be rejected by installing C0.

(3)dif before C0

… to be rejected by target fiber.

This talk

MC simulation (GEANT3) for K2 BG rejection (1) fiber size

(2) target thickness

(3) K2 BG fraction

Page 4: Tracking(1) K p 2 decay-in-flight BG simulation

Analysis of target fiber

• fiber geometry square type □2mm20 cm lengthtarget radius : 3cm

• K+ beam800 MeV/c, pencil beam

2 different type of ADC or amplifier are needed.

Energy deposit in each fiber (MeV)

Maximum energy deposit in 1 fiber (MeV)

total energy deposit (MeV)

number of hit fiber

Page 5: Tracking(1) K p 2 decay-in-flight BG simulation

Fiber size and spatial resolution of K+ stopping position

• K+ stopping position was determined as a function of fiber size by GEANT3.

• Analysis method Method 1 :K+ stopping position was determined by 1 fiber position which has the maximum energy deposit.Method 2:K+ stopping position was determined by energy weighted average of 2 fiber positions which has the maximum and 2nd maximum energy deposit.

Energy deposit

H

L Method 1 Method 2

x xx

Page 6: Tracking(1) K p 2 decay-in-flight BG simulation

Spatial resolution of K+ stopping position as a function of fiber size

open : method 1 (using 1 fiber info.)

closed: method 2 (using 2 fibers info.)

K+ stopping position was obtained to be 0.07cm in RMS.

L

method 1L=1.5mm

method 1L=2.5mm

method 1L=2mm

rdiff =true – measured

L (cm)

Page 7: Tracking(1) K p 2 decay-in-flight BG simulation

K2-dif fraction in K3 sample

• K2 decay-in-flight fraction was obtained as a function of target radius by a GEANT3 code.

• C0(GEM) position was fixed and more realistic than the previous study.rGEM= 8cm, =0.01cm

4 point tracking (C0, C2, C3, C4) with a 2 cut

requirement by TOF P>185 MeV/c or back-to-b

ack events are rejected.

K3K2

tracking2

Page 8: Tracking(1) K p 2 decay-in-flight BG simulation

Target diff. spectra

rtarg=5cm rtarg=3cm• Most of survived K2 events

after K3 selection is + decay-in-flight before C0 chamber.

• Resolution of K+ stopping position (=0.07cm) is not considered.

rtarg=5cm rtarg=3cmrtarg=5cm

K+ stop. pos. (hit-fit) (cm)

rtarg=3cmrtarg=5cm

K3

K2

0.12 cm in RMS

0.07 cm in RMS

K2 BG could be rejected by target diff. cut.

Page 9: Tracking(1) K p 2 decay-in-flight BG simulation

Results of K2 BG fraction

red: 5cm radiusblue: 3 cm radius

• K2 background fraction can be obtained as

BG fraction=

• Ω is the detector acceptance with K3 selection conditions.

Br(K2)* Ω(K)

Br(K3)* Ω(K3)

event survive factor for target diff. cut

Page 10: Tracking(1) K p 2 decay-in-flight BG simulation

Summary

• Fraction of K2 dif BG is estimated by using a GEANT3 for target radius of 3cm and 5cm .

• Most of survived K2 events after K3 selection is + decay-in-flight before C0 chamber.Arrangement of target fiber with C0 is key point to reject.

• Resolution of K+ stopping position is evaluated. 0.07cm in RMS

• Fraction of K2 BG is controlled to be 0.1-0.5% level.

Page 11: Tracking(1) K p 2 decay-in-flight BG simulation

backup

Page 12: Tracking(1) K p 2 decay-in-flight BG simulation

Consistency of Kpi2 BG fraction between last reported value and this talk

• previous reported at KEKBG fraction = 0.3 %

• Difference Feb. Aug.

GEM =200micron 100micron r= 5cm 8cmtarget r=3cm 3cm, 5cmtracking 2 cut adequate adequatetarget diff. cut loose adequate

Page 13: Tracking(1) K p 2 decay-in-flight BG simulation

Simple estimation of K2 BG events

• momentum of K2 + 205MeV/c; = 0.84 c is nearly 100cm• target radius is neary 10cm• 1- exp(-10/100) is nearly prob= 0.1• fraction of K2 decay in flight in the target is

BR(K2)/BR(K3) * prob is neary 1.

The number of K2 decay-in-flight in the target is comparable to the number of Kmu3 events