TPACK: E-learning africa 2011
-
Upload
ayoub-kafyulilo -
Category
Education
-
view
1.716 -
download
2
description
Transcript of TPACK: E-learning africa 2011
ICT Use in Science and Mathematics Teachers’ Preparation: Developing Pre-service Teachers’
TPACK
Ayoub KafyuliloPetra FisserJoke Voogt
E-Learning Africa May 25th to 27, 2011. Dar es salaam, Tanzania
Introduction
• High failure rates in science and mathematics in Tanzania secondary schools
• ICT is reported to enhance students’ learning in science and mathematics (Keong et al 2005; Voogt 2003)
• In Tanzania teachers are either not using, or inappropriately using ICT in teaching
04/10/23 2Technological Pedagogical Content Knowledge at DUCE
Introduction
• ICT use in teaching depends on how teachers learned with ICT (LeBaron et al, 2009; Doering et al, 2003)
• In Tanzania, teachers have the basic ICT knowledge but not conversant with the integration of technology, Pedagogy and Content (Kafyulilo, 2010)
04/10/23 Technological Pedagogical Content Knowledge at DUCE
3
The Problem• Insufficient training of teachers leads to a
gap between the knowledge gained at the college and knowledge required in schools
04/10/23 Technological Pedagogical Content Knowledge at DUCE
4
Knowledge gained Knowledge required
Teachers
College School
The TPACK FrameworkTo meet the school requirements we need to develop teachers’ Technological Pedagogical Content Knowledge (TPACK)
Research Questions• What competencies do pre-service
science and mathematics teachers have in TPACK?
• What intervention activities are effective in developing pre-service teachers’ TPACK?
• What are the impacts of intervention activities on the pre-service science and mathematics teachers’ TPACK?
04/10/23 6Technological Pedagogical Content Knowledge at DUCE
Methodology: Participants
04/10/23 Technological Pedagogical Content Knowledge at DUCE
7
Participants Teaching Subject
No. Mat Ph Chem Bio
Students 29 14 6 1 8
Instructors 4 1 1 0 2
04/10/23 Technological Pedagogical Content Knowledge at DUCE
8
Instrument and Data Analysis
• Instrument: student questionnaire, Instructor Interview & observation checklist
• Analysis: means, standard deviation and independent sample t tests
• Interaction matrix sheet
04/10/23 Technological Pedagogical Content Knowledge at DUCE
9
Survey: pre-interventionCompetency area M SD
Technological Knowledge 3.18 0.65
Pedagogical Knowledge 4.29 0.46
Content knowledge 4.55 0.48
Pedagogical Content Knowledge 4.17 0.57
Technological Content Knowledge 3.54 0.53
Technological Pedagogical Knowledge 4.03 0.67
Technological Pedagogical Content Knowledge 3.46 0.58
Observation: Pre-intervention
04/10/23 Technological Pedagogical Content Knowledge at DUCE
10
Competency M SD
Technological Knowledge 1.50 0.28
Content Knowledge 1.68 0.20
Pedagogical knowledge 1.38 0.27
Pedagogical Content Knowledge 1.74 0.32
Technological Content Knowledge 1.41 0.33
Technological Pedagogical knowledge 1.54 0.41
Technological Pedagogical Content Knowledge
1.41 0.22
Developing TPACK: What intervention?
Intervention Attained TPACK Knowledge
Attained technology
integration skills
M SD M SD
Microteaching 4.42 0.50 4.23 0.59
Training 4.46 0.71 4.42 0.58
Peers’ appraisal 4.38 0.64 4.27 0.60
Lesson design 4.27 0.60 4.50 0.5104/10/23 11Technological Pedagogical
Content Knowledge at DUCE
Results: Impact of Intervention
CategoryPre intervention
(N = 29)Postinterventio
(N = 22)p Effect size
M (SD) M (SD)TK 3.18 (0.65) 3.66 (0.49) 0.01 - 0.83PK 4.29 (0.46) 4.33 (0.31) 0.72 - 0.10MatK 4.55 (0.48) 4.66 (0.30) 0.59 - 0.27PhK 4.46 (0.53) 4.66 (0.30) 0.39 - 0.46BioK 4.58 (0.47) 4.63 (0.41) 0.87 - 0.11PCK 4.17 (0.57) 4.34 (0.45) 0.26 - 0.33TCK 3.94 (0.52) 4.27 (0.43) 0.02 - 0.69TPK 4.03 (0.67) 4.35 (0.43) 0.05 - 0.57TPACK 3.86 (0.58) 4.17 (0.38) 0.03 - 0.63
04/10/23 Technological Pedagogical Content Knowledge at DUCE
12
Results: Impact of Intervention
04/10/23 Technological Pedagogical Content Knowledge at DUCE
13
Category
Pre intervention (N = 39)
Post intervention(N = 38)
pEffect
size
M (SD) M (SD)
TK 1.55 (0.27) 1.58 (0.30) 0.67 - 0.25PK 1.48 (0.27) 1.63 (0.36) 0.04 - 0.47CK 1.54 (0.41) 1.62 (0.38) 0.41 - 0.20PCK 1.74 (0.32) 1.60 (0.38) 0.10 0.40TPK 1.41 (0.28) 1.56 (0.36) 0.04 - 0.47TCK 1.41 (0.33) 1.60 (0.35) 0.01 - 0.55TPACK 1.51 (0.24) 1.51 (0.29) 0.91 0.00
04/10/23 Technological Pedagogical Content Knowledge at DUCE
14
Conclusions
• Majority of teachers graduating from DUCE are competent in CK, PK and PCK but less competent in TK, TCK, TPK and TPACK
• Thus, we need a shift from teaching technology to the development of teachers’ TPACK, which is the heart of good teaching with technology (Koehler & Mishra, 2009)
Need for a shift
04/10/23 Technological Pedagogical Content Knowledge at DUCE
15
Pedagogy
Technology
Content
PCK
PCK Content
TCK
Pedagogy
TPK
Technology
TPACK
• TPACK can best be developed when teachers:– experience it in their own learning (model)– practice it in a context similar to real teaching – share it with colleagues (design teams)
04/10/23 Technological Pedagogical Content Knowledge at DUCE
16
Thank you very much for your attention
Asanteni sana kwa kunisikiliza
04/10/23 Technological Pedagogical Content Knowledge at DUCE
17