Towards a high quality 2011 Census The 2011 Census Questionnaire
description
Transcript of Towards a high quality 2011 Census The 2011 Census Questionnaire
![Page 1: Towards a high quality 2011 Census The 2011 Census Questionnaire](https://reader033.fdocuments.us/reader033/viewer/2022051001/568148cd550346895db5e9d9/html5/thumbnails/1.jpg)
Towards a high quality 2011 Census
The 2011 Census Questionnaire
Pete BentonPete Benton
Deputy Director, Census ProgrammeDeputy Director, Census Programme
![Page 2: Towards a high quality 2011 Census The 2011 Census Questionnaire](https://reader033.fdocuments.us/reader033/viewer/2022051001/568148cd550346895db5e9d9/html5/thumbnails/2.jpg)
Overview
• Quick look at– Development history– Questionnaire content
• How does it all come together to produce a high quality population estimate?
• What about short term migrants?
![Page 3: Towards a high quality 2011 Census The 2011 Census Questionnaire](https://reader033.fdocuments.us/reader033/viewer/2022051001/568148cd550346895db5e9d9/html5/thumbnails/3.jpg)
Census provides statistics on:
• Population units: – people and housing &– key demographics (age, sex, marital status,
ethnicity)
• Population structures: – households, families
• More detailed characteristics :– eg religion, labour market status, industry,
qualifications, health/disability; etc
• Key requirement to ‘Get the Count Right’
![Page 4: Towards a high quality 2011 Census The 2011 Census Questionnaire](https://reader033.fdocuments.us/reader033/viewer/2022051001/568148cd550346895db5e9d9/html5/thumbnails/4.jpg)
Key lessons from 2001 Census
• Need to gather information on more than just usual residents
– Include visitors
• Need more information to aid understand of coverage
– Addresses/households– People within households
![Page 5: Towards a high quality 2011 Census The 2011 Census Questionnaire](https://reader033.fdocuments.us/reader033/viewer/2022051001/568148cd550346895db5e9d9/html5/thumbnails/5.jpg)
Subsequent changes in society
• More people at more than one address– Weekday residences for work– Holiday / weekend homes– Children of divorced parents
• International migration– More ‘short term visitors to UK’ – resident or not?
• Plus familiar issues of students, armed
forces, prisons, hospitals, hotels, hostels• Risk of undercount, overcount, or wrong location• Need to count the right people, in the right place
– and be able to demonstrate this with confidence
![Page 6: Towards a high quality 2011 Census The 2011 Census Questionnaire](https://reader033.fdocuments.us/reader033/viewer/2022051001/568148cd550346895db5e9d9/html5/thumbnails/6.jpg)
Questionnaire research to date
• Formal 3 month consultation (May 2005)
• Over 2000 responses from 500 users
• Scoring of user requirements
• Initial topic proposals
• Further topic-specific consultation
• Roadshows
• Question testing– Qualitative: Cognitive testing (6 waves over 3 years), focus
groups– Quantitative: 2007 test, omnibus survey, postal tests
![Page 7: Towards a high quality 2011 Census The 2011 Census Questionnaire](https://reader033.fdocuments.us/reader033/viewer/2022051001/568148cd550346895db5e9d9/html5/thumbnails/7.jpg)
Summary of user requirements
• Most 2001 topics• Many new topics, including:
- income (not included)- language- second residences- sexual identity (not included)
- national identity• More than 3 pages of questions!• Difficult trade-offs to be made• Additional £22m funding for 4th page of
questions per person obtained
![Page 8: Towards a high quality 2011 Census The 2011 Census Questionnaire](https://reader033.fdocuments.us/reader033/viewer/2022051001/568148cd550346895db5e9d9/html5/thumbnails/8.jpg)
New topics - population
• Population units and structures– National identity– Citizenship– Visitors– Year / month of entry into UK
• Intended length of stay??
– Second residence address and purpose
• Population characteristics– Language
![Page 9: Towards a high quality 2011 Census The 2011 Census Questionnaire](https://reader033.fdocuments.us/reader033/viewer/2022051001/568148cd550346895db5e9d9/html5/thumbnails/9.jpg)
New topics - housing
• Housing characteristics– Number of bedrooms– Type of central heating (just ‘yes/no’ in 2001)
![Page 10: Towards a high quality 2011 Census The 2011 Census Questionnaire](https://reader033.fdocuments.us/reader033/viewer/2022051001/568148cd550346895db5e9d9/html5/thumbnails/10.jpg)
Removed topics (since 2001)
• Bathroom and toilet• Size of workplace• Lowest floor level
![Page 11: Towards a high quality 2011 Census The 2011 Census Questionnaire](https://reader033.fdocuments.us/reader033/viewer/2022051001/568148cd550346895db5e9d9/html5/thumbnails/11.jpg)
Changed questions (selected)
• Marital status – civil partnerships• Ethnicity
– Additional tick boxes– Revised grouping / wording
• Qualification – clearer categories• Banded hours worked – actual hours in 2001• Address one year ago – identification of
students• Updated ethnicity
![Page 12: Towards a high quality 2011 Census The 2011 Census Questionnaire](https://reader033.fdocuments.us/reader033/viewer/2022051001/568148cd550346895db5e9d9/html5/thumbnails/12.jpg)
UK comparability
• 30 common topics– 11 others in one or more countries
• Common wording in approx 40 out of 50 questions
![Page 13: Towards a high quality 2011 Census The 2011 Census Questionnaire](https://reader033.fdocuments.us/reader033/viewer/2022051001/568148cd550346895db5e9d9/html5/thumbnails/13.jpg)
Production of population estimates (1)
• Step 1: Create best possible initial address register• Step 2: Census field work / initial questionnaire
processing– Add new addresses– Remove non-existent addresses– Assess status of non-responding addresses– Remove of duplicate responses
• Step 3: Assess and adjust for coverage– Of addresses / households– Of people within households, and adjust– Using address register, census and CCS data
![Page 14: Towards a high quality 2011 Census The 2011 Census Questionnaire](https://reader033.fdocuments.us/reader033/viewer/2022051001/568148cd550346895db5e9d9/html5/thumbnails/14.jpg)
Production of population estimates (2)
• Step 4: Quality Assure– a) Using “Census” data
• Visitors, second residences, dummy forms, migration data– b) Using other sources
• Admin data, surveys, demographic data• Step 5: Investigate
– Further visitor / second residence matching– Further admin /demographic data analysis
• Step 6: Translate to MYE base– 6 mths to 12 mths residence rule– Family/permanent residence to ‘majority of time’ address– Roll forward 3 months
• Step 7: Explain– Second residence data (questionnaires and dummy forms)– ?? Short term migrant data / intention to stay
![Page 15: Towards a high quality 2011 Census The 2011 Census Questionnaire](https://reader033.fdocuments.us/reader033/viewer/2022051001/568148cd550346895db5e9d9/html5/thumbnails/15.jpg)
Step 8: Investigate / Prepare for the future?
• ‘Freeze’ admin datasets on 27 March 2011• Compare census and other sources• Especially immigration data?
![Page 16: Towards a high quality 2011 Census The 2011 Census Questionnaire](https://reader033.fdocuments.us/reader033/viewer/2022051001/568148cd550346895db5e9d9/html5/thumbnails/16.jpg)
Second residences in coverage assessment / QA
• Duplicate returns from different locations:– e.g student counted at both term-time and parents’
address, people with second residences for the working week, children of divorced parents
• General matching process to search for duplicates
– use second residences information to help
• During QA, use to explore address status– No usual residents, clearly a second residence?
![Page 17: Towards a high quality 2011 Census The 2011 Census Questionnaire](https://reader033.fdocuments.us/reader033/viewer/2022051001/568148cd550346895db5e9d9/html5/thumbnails/17.jpg)
Second residences in 2007 postal test
• 2.5% of respondents said they had a second residence• A further 1% of respondents said they had a second
residence outside the UK
• Of those who said they had a second residence:– 87% entered the address
• 69% of those entered the full postcode• 11% of postcodes were half completed• 20% of postcodes were left blank
• Of those that entered an address, the highest frequency of location was London (13%), followed by West Sussex (9%)
![Page 18: Towards a high quality 2011 Census The 2011 Census Questionnaire](https://reader033.fdocuments.us/reader033/viewer/2022051001/568148cd550346895db5e9d9/html5/thumbnails/18.jpg)
Visitor information for Quality Assurance
• Sample matched back to usual residence– check whether they were missed where they usually live
• In CCS areas, match to CCS record for household they were visiting
– check whether they were mis-classified– Apply the mis-classification rate to visitor numbers in
non-CCS areas
• Full match in some LAs if QA suggests concerns• Considered matching all
– low cost benefit– Delays– Let the CCS do its job
![Page 19: Towards a high quality 2011 Census The 2011 Census Questionnaire](https://reader033.fdocuments.us/reader033/viewer/2022051001/568148cd550346895db5e9d9/html5/thumbnails/19.jpg)
Visitors in the 2001 Census
• From a sample of 7 Enumeration Areas:– 9.5% of people recorded as visitors were actually
recorded as usual residents too– 1.5% were of no fixed abode and should have been
recorded as usual residents– 17% of visitors were overseas visitors– 67% of visitors were from elsewhere in the UK
• 20% of these UK visitors were missed at their usual residence
– 4.5% of visitors did not have an address recorded
• It is estimated there will be around 2.1 million visitors on Census night in 2011
![Page 20: Towards a high quality 2011 Census The 2011 Census Questionnaire](https://reader033.fdocuments.us/reader033/viewer/2022051001/568148cd550346895db5e9d9/html5/thumbnails/20.jpg)
Use of short term migrant data
• Users will cross check census data with other sources– 2001: used council tax lists
• 2011: likely to use information on migrants– Already challenging MYEs on this basis– Significant volumes (at present)
• Proposal: Migrants in UK for > 1 (3?) months fill in full questionnaire, with ‘intention to stay question’
– Filter out 3-6 month migrants from UR base– But use info on numbers / characteristics
• Likely to be poor quality, but plan would be to use to understand administrative sources
– Aggregate, perhaps individual matching
![Page 21: Towards a high quality 2011 Census The 2011 Census Questionnaire](https://reader033.fdocuments.us/reader033/viewer/2022051001/568148cd550346895db5e9d9/html5/thumbnails/21.jpg)
“Not a census question”
• Snapshot – rapidly changing• Quality
– Will they answer the census?– Even if they do, would they answer an intention to
stay question– If so, what would the quality be like?
• Would 1 month or 3 month cut off be better?
– How could we use the resulting info anyway?
![Page 22: Towards a high quality 2011 Census The 2011 Census Questionnaire](https://reader033.fdocuments.us/reader033/viewer/2022051001/568148cd550346895db5e9d9/html5/thumbnails/22.jpg)
Research
• Focus groups / interviews (NCSR)• Cognitive testing• IPS interviewers• Omnibus survey• Postal test
– 10,000 random national sample of households• 50% 6 month, no intention to stay, < 6mths as visitors• 50% 1 month (full question set), with intention to stay
– 10,000 random sample from Northampton• Similar 50/50 split
![Page 23: Towards a high quality 2011 Census The 2011 Census Questionnaire](https://reader033.fdocuments.us/reader033/viewer/2022051001/568148cd550346895db5e9d9/html5/thumbnails/23.jpg)
High level findings
• Would fill in the census, IF they realised they had to
• Would then answer an intention to stay question– With a reasonable degree of confidence– Better with a 3 month cut-off than 1 month
• Postal test– No impact nationally– Small, statistically significant impact locally
• Still analysing the data
![Page 24: Towards a high quality 2011 Census The 2011 Census Questionnaire](https://reader033.fdocuments.us/reader033/viewer/2022051001/568148cd550346895db5e9d9/html5/thumbnails/24.jpg)
Discussion
• Short term migrants– Better to ‘ignore the problem’
• Discussion will happen post 2011• STMs will have to make a choice
Either explicitly or implicitly
– Better to have some information than none?• Wouldn’t provide robust estimates• New paradigm in census questions
– include a ‘poor’ topic, solely to aid administrative source analysis
• A step into a brave new world or a foolish misadventure?