Types of Early Childhood Curricula by Arianny Calcagno, M.Ed.
Torino, September 2008 Innovative Institutions and Products for Retirement Provision in Europe Lans...
-
Upload
marjory-reynolds -
Category
Documents
-
view
212 -
download
0
Transcript of Torino, September 2008 Innovative Institutions and Products for Retirement Provision in Europe Lans...
Torino, September 2008
Innovative Institutions and Products for Retirement Provision in Europe
Lans Bovenberg and Theo NijmanRiccardo Calcagno
VU University Amsterdam
Lugano, May 23 2
A short summary
The starting point: pension systems are under reform From unfunded plans (PAYG) to funded schemes
New challenges: Transition period Collective vs. individual plans DB vs. DC plans: optimal risk sharing
Start looking at a base life cycle model to define a “first best” allocation of saving and risk
Compute the welfare losses due to market incompleteness / financial constraints
Lugano, May 23 3
A short summary Are individuals able to implement the first best?
Financial illiteracy Hyperbolic discounting (time inconsistency) Under-diversification (access to capital markets may be
excessively costly) How can collective plans improve on individual choices?
DB, DC or “hybrid” plans?
Gaps in the literature Human capital is risky Liquidity constraints Hedge of systematic risk
A description of the Dutch “stand-alone” collective schemes
Recommendations about European research infrastructure and networks
Lugano, May 23 4
My interpretation and questions Individual choice is optimal under strong assumptions
When individual cannot implement the “first best” collective plans may improve welfare
However, simple individual plans (e.g. DC with constant premia) are not the solution
Methodology (BKNT): compute welfare losses due to a “friction” from the first best
Force individuals into collective plans: DB vs. DC
Lugano, May 23 5
My interpretation and questions Difficulties in creating fully funded DB plans: regulation may
not be too strict? New accounting rules Mark to market obligations
“Hybrid” plans are better;
Collective plans are not “tailor-made”: good for the “average” individual?
Agency issues (even in independent trusts as the Dutch stand-alone funds);
More severe agency issues in traditional DB funds Risk-taking by companies who have a claim on possible
surplus in the fund
Three lines of research
Markets and institutional frictions New financial instruments and market design
Agency issues Governance / creation of new institutions
Individual “biases” Experiments