Top-Down Asset Allocation for Latin America Clairvoyant Investment Advisors Sonia Kopp Chris Lyford...

8
Top-Down Asset Allocation for Latin America Clairvoyant Investment Advisors Sonia Kopp Chris Lyford Peter O’Hara Denis Rappaport Michelle Todd February 24, 2000

Transcript of Top-Down Asset Allocation for Latin America Clairvoyant Investment Advisors Sonia Kopp Chris Lyford...

Page 1: Top-Down Asset Allocation for Latin America Clairvoyant Investment Advisors Sonia Kopp Chris Lyford Peter O’Hara Denis Rappaport Michelle Todd February.

Top-Down Asset Allocation for Latin America

Clairvoyant Investment Advisors

Sonia Kopp

Chris Lyford

Peter O’Hara

Denis Rappaport

Michelle Todd

February 24, 2000

Page 2: Top-Down Asset Allocation for Latin America Clairvoyant Investment Advisors Sonia Kopp Chris Lyford Peter O’Hara Denis Rappaport Michelle Todd February.

Investment Mandate

To use a top-down asset allocation model to dynamically allocate amongst five Latin American Countries with the objective of outperforming established dollar-priced Latin American indices.

Page 3: Top-Down Asset Allocation for Latin America Clairvoyant Investment Advisors Sonia Kopp Chris Lyford Peter O’Hara Denis Rappaport Michelle Todd February.

Markets and Indices

Argentina Brazil Chile Mexico Venezuela IFC Latin America U$ Index MSCI Latin America U$ Index

Page 4: Top-Down Asset Allocation for Latin America Clairvoyant Investment Advisors Sonia Kopp Chris Lyford Peter O’Hara Denis Rappaport Michelle Todd February.

In-Sample Model SummaryAsset Class Variable Lag Coefficient T-Ratio Adjusted R^2 D-W

Chile Equities Var. of Reserves 1 0.28 1.62 0.066 1.813Unemployment 2 -0.15 -1.41Mexico Returns 1 0.18 2.50

Brazil Equities Brazil P/BV to LA P/B 1 -0.56 -3.73 0.092 1.854Brazil P/E to LA P/E 1 0.00 1.85Exchange Rates 1 -0.16 -1.86Brazil P/E 1 0.00 -1.91

Mexico Equities Int'l Investor Country Rating1 0.00 3.48 0.201 1.994Price/Earnings 1 0.00 -2.43Exchange Rates 1 -0.39 -2.51Interest Rates Variation 1 6.78 2.83Price/Book Value 1 -0.01 -2.63

Venezuela Equities Exchange Rates 1 -0.16 -1.25 0.14 2.332Int'l Liquidity 2 0.43 2.88Oil Exports 2 0.41 2.70Price Earnings 1 0.01 1.23U.S. Risk Free 1 22.63 1.28

Argentina Equities Bond Yield 1 -0.49 -3.97 0.192 2.002Inflation Rates 1 3.78 2.53Brazil Returns 1 -0.23 -2.23

Page 5: Top-Down Asset Allocation for Latin America Clairvoyant Investment Advisors Sonia Kopp Chris Lyford Peter O’Hara Denis Rappaport Michelle Todd February.

1999 Out-of-Sample ResultsIFC MSCI

Portfolio Return Benchmark return Benchmark returnJan'99 -4.17% -11.88% -7.21%Feb'99 4.97% 5.62% -6.83%Mar'99 18.45% 20.72% -0.56%Apr'99 15.59% 14.29% 24.24%May'99 -3.09% -3.81% 15.21%June'99 3.76% 3.98% -5.82%July'99 -6.33% -7.10% 5.90%Aug'99 -2.05% -3.13% -10.54%Sep'99 3.26% 1.80% -0.16%Oct'99 0.88% 1.76% -0.24%Nov'99 8.38% 12.71% 4.90%Dec'99 17.33% 16.43% 12.91%Total Return 68.32% 57.11% 29.51%

Page 6: Top-Down Asset Allocation for Latin America Clairvoyant Investment Advisors Sonia Kopp Chris Lyford Peter O’Hara Denis Rappaport Michelle Todd February.

Currency Comment

A Critical Issue Overlays Expensive Predicting Returns: Avoiding De-valuations

Page 7: Top-Down Asset Allocation for Latin America Clairvoyant Investment Advisors Sonia Kopp Chris Lyford Peter O’Hara Denis Rappaport Michelle Todd February.

Final Insights and Remarks

Implementation Time Horizon Model Deterioration Improving Top-Down Latin American

Strategies in the Future

Page 8: Top-Down Asset Allocation for Latin America Clairvoyant Investment Advisors Sonia Kopp Chris Lyford Peter O’Hara Denis Rappaport Michelle Todd February.

Raw Direction Count DataIn-Sample Raw Direction Count and Percentage Argentina Brazil Chile Mexico VenezuelaTotal Correct Direction: 60 60 65 73 49Total Incorrect Direction: 30 44 42 35 30% of Correct Direction: 66.7% 57.7% 60.7% 67.6% 62.0%Total Positive Directions Forecasted Directly 38 43 48 48 28% of Positive Directions Forecasted Correctly 76.0% 72.9% 82.8% 71.6% 71.8%Total Negative Directions Forecasted Correctly 22 17 17 25 21% of Negative Directions Forecasted Directly 55.0% 37.8% 34.7% 61.0% 52.5%

Out-Of-Sample Raw Direction Count

Total Correct Direction 3 4 9 4 6Total Incorrect Direction 9 8 3 8 6% of Correct Direction 25.0% 33.3% 75.0% 33.3% 50.0%Total Positive Directions Forecasted Correctly 1 0 5 4 2% of Positive Directions Forecasted Correctly 12.5% 0.0% 83.3% 44.4% 40.0%Total Negative Directions Forecasted Correctly 2 4 4 0 4% of Negative Directions Forecasted Correctly 50% 100% 67% 0% 57.1%