Top 10 consultation mistakes and how to avoid them

27
consultationinstitute.org Top 10 29 October 2014

Transcript of Top 10 consultation mistakes and how to avoid them

consultationinstitute.org

Top 10

29 October 2014

consultationinstitute.org

Housekeeping!

@TCInews

• Fire exits & facilities…• Documentation etc• Phone etiquette • Twitter?

consultationinstitute.org

The Consultation Institute Not-for-profit; Best Practice organisation; founded 2003

Consultation & Public Engagement ‘Think Tank’

UK…& beyond

Centre of Excellence

CPD1,020+members

Quality Assurance

Advanced Practitioner

Certificate (APC)Centre for Communications &

Consultation Research

Consultation-related events

eg #TCI11 Conference 22 October 2014

consultationinstitute.org

10

Missing Mandatory Considerations

Equalities Impact Assessment

consultationinstitute.org

Missing Impact Assessment

Legal requirement

• Not complete• Done retrospectively

consultationinstitute.org

Secretary of State for Education

Versus

Luton BC, Nottingham CC, Waltham Forest LB, Newham LB, Kent CC, Sandwell MBC

Cancel “Building Schools for the Future”

• Ministers are not “above the law”

Birmingham City Council versus “R”

Changes to social care policy

consultationinstitute.org

9

Survey Error

Wrong questions/bad design

consultationinstitute.org

Survey Error

Can skew entire consultation

• No framing questions• No narrative / out of context• Too complex• Broken logic

consultationinstitute.org

8

No scope/scope creep

No clarity/focus shift

consultationinstitute.org

No scope/scope creep

Lack of clarity about what can and can’t be influenced

• Creates confusion• Helps focus evaluation• Clouds key issues• Less meaningful

consultationinstitute.org

7

Public meeting shambles

Wrong venues/badly managed

consultationinstitute.org

Public meeting shambles

Mismanagement

• Poor facilitation• Venue choice (parking?)• Format• Inequalities

consultationinstitute.org

6

Poor publicity

Wrong audience, no visibility

consultationinstitute.org

Poor publicity

Missing voices, poor participation rates

• Can create inequalities• Not reviewed• Not proactive

consultationinstitute.org

5

Disclosure

Closed facts

consultationinstitute.org

Save our Surgery Ltd

Versus

The Joint Committee of PCTs

Avoid closure of Cardiac Unit at Leeds Infirmary

• Did not reveal sub-scores from panel• Refused requests for information on scoring

consultationinstitute.org

Disclosure

Consultation does not allow for intelligent consideration

• Missing information• Two-way disclosure• Transient stages

consultationinstitute.org

4

Managing stakeholders

Social media

consultationinstitute.org

Managing stakeholders

Inform, feedback cycle

• Identification of key ones• Social listening & intelligence• Dealing with complaints• Missing voices

consultationinstitute.org

3

Fair interpretation

Conscientious consideration

consultationinstitute.org

Fair interpretation

Balanced & honest findings

• Perceived bias (credibility)• Presentation of results• Improper analysis tools

consultationinstitute.org

2

Data handling

Collecting & considering evidence

consultationinstitute.org

Data handling

Balanced & honest findings

• Dealing with qualitative data• Activity evidence• Coding

consultationinstitute.org

1

Predetermination

Burden of proof & transparency

consultationinstitute.org

Predetermination

Honest integrity

• Stepping back• Preferred options• Pre-consultation• Honey trap

consultationinstitute.org

Parting dale Lane Residents Association

Versus

London Borough of Barnet

Order to re-open previously closed road

• Elected member speeches and emails said it would happen

• Evidentiary value of emails etc. in establishing that decision maker had made up their mind

consultationinstitute.org

Top 10

29 October 2014