Tom Standage, the Economist - Media Connected

download Tom Standage, the Economist - Media Connected

of 49

Transcript of Tom Standage, the Economist - Media Connected

  • 8/9/2019 Tom Standage, the Economist - Media Connected

    1/49

    Why technology journalism matters

    Tom Standage, The Economist

    January 17th 2009

  • 8/9/2019 Tom Standage, the Economist - Media Connected

    2/49

    Introduction

    Tom Standage: Business Editorand Technology QuarterlyEditor,

    The Economist

  • 8/9/2019 Tom Standage, the Economist - Media Connected

    3/49

    Introduction

    About The Economist

    Global news weekly

    Circulation: 1.4m56% of readers in North America

    31% in Europe; 10% in Asia

    2% in Middle East & Africa

  • 8/9/2019 Tom Standage, the Economist - Media Connected

    4/49

    Introduction

    Why I am a technology journalist

    The future is already here its

    just unevenly distributed.-- William Gibson

    And I get to talk to the worlds

    cleverest people

  • 8/9/2019 Tom Standage, the Economist - Media Connected

    5/49

    Introduction

    1. The past: How tech journalismhas changed

    2. The present: How we do itat The Economist

    3. The future: Where techjournalism is going

  • 8/9/2019 Tom Standage, the Economist - Media Connected

    6/49

    1. The past: How tech

    journalism has changed

  • 8/9/2019 Tom Standage, the Economist - Media Connected

    7/49

    1. How tech journalism has changed

    Two big stories in the past 15

    years have made tech journalismmore important than ever:

    The rise of the internet

    The spread of mobile phones

  • 8/9/2019 Tom Standage, the Economist - Media Connected

    8/49

    1. How tech journalism has changed

    The internet has affected almost

    every aspect of human life:business, politics, social life

    (It has changed journalism, too)

    The internet makes computersuseful to almost everyone

  • 8/9/2019 Tom Standage, the Economist - Media Connected

    9/49

    1. How tech journalism has changed

    The internets rise created strong

    demand for people to explain it

    Economistreaders consistentlyasked for more coverage of itsimpact on business

    My route into journalism in 1994!

  • 8/9/2019 Tom Standage, the Economist - Media Connected

    10/49

    1. How tech journalism has changed

    Tech journalists went fromwriting about gadgets

    to being expected to commenton privacy, censorship, telecomsregulation, competition policy,

    intellectual property, etc

  • 8/9/2019 Tom Standage, the Economist - Media Connected

    11/49

    1. How tech journalism has changed

    Many early debates have been

    resolved, and real-world laws andrules have largely been imposedon the internet

    Journalists helped to frame the

    debate and influence the outcome,if only by explaining things

  • 8/9/2019 Tom Standage, the Economist - Media Connected

    12/49

    1. How tech journalism has changed

    Nobody still thinks the internetcan be turned off

    It is understood that carriers andISPs are not responsible for theirusers actions

  • 8/9/2019 Tom Standage, the Economist - Media Connected

    13/49

    1. How tech journalism has changed

    Unresolved internet debates:

    Net neutrality

    Behavioural targetingTerrorists/Google Earth

    We still have work to do

  • 8/9/2019 Tom Standage, the Economist - Media Connected

    14/49

    1. How tech journalism has changed

    The spread of mobile phones

    has affected more people thanthe rise of the internet

    The internet supplemented otherforms of communication for most

    users; mobile phones oftenprovide access for the first time

  • 8/9/2019 Tom Standage, the Economist - Media Connected

    15/49

    1. How tech journalism has changed

  • 8/9/2019 Tom Standage, the Economist - Media Connected

    16/49

    1. How tech journalism has changed

    Mobile phones have direct

    impact on economic activity:

    Substitute for poor infrastructure

    (shop in Afghanistan)Price discovery, market access(fishermen in Kerala)

    New uses: mobile banking(M-PESA in Kenya)

  • 8/9/2019 Tom Standage, the Economist - Media Connected

    17/49

    1. How tech journalism has changed

    An extra 10 mobile phones per100 people in a typical

    developing country leads to anextra 0.6 percentage points inGDP growth. (Waverman,

    London Business School, 2005)

  • 8/9/2019 Tom Standage, the Economist - Media Connected

    18/49

    1. How tech journalism has changed

    All governments claim to be

    pro-growth and pro-connectivity

    But not all of them have the rightpolicies in place to promote thespread of mobile phones

  • 8/9/2019 Tom Standage, the Economist - Media Connected

    19/49

    1. How tech journalism has changed

    Private firms will build networks if

    they are given the chance

    $230 billion invested in telecoms

    infrastructure in the developingworld,1993 - 2003 (World Bank)

    Not big Western firms: local

    champions such as Orascom,Investcom, MTN, etc

  • 8/9/2019 Tom Standage, the Economist - Media Connected

    20/49

    1. How tech journalism has changed

    Deregulation is key

    Ethiopia: 1.4% (one operator)

    DRC: 10.5% (four operators)But comparable GDP per capita

    Somalia 7% (no government!)

  • 8/9/2019 Tom Standage, the Economist - Media Connected

    21/49

    1. How tech journalism has changed

    Governments also impose

    luxury taxes on handsets,hindering adoption

    But done right, mobile telecomscan be a big contributor of taxes

    (14% in Afghanistan)

  • 8/9/2019 Tom Standage, the Economist - Media Connected

    22/49

    1. How tech journalism has changed

    Unlike with the internet, there is

    not a thirst to have this explained.But it is important

    Technology overlaps witheconomics, regulation and

    development. Reporting itaccurately is more vital than ever

  • 8/9/2019 Tom Standage, the Economist - Media Connected

    23/49

    2. The present: How we do it

    at The Economist

  • 8/9/2019 Tom Standage, the Economist - Media Connected

    24/49

    2. How we do it

    Scientists and technologists

    like our coverage because:

    We get it right, mostly

    We explain what they do totheir families and friends

    We keep them up to date with

    developments in other fields

  • 8/9/2019 Tom Standage, the Economist - Media Connected

    25/49

    2. How we do it

    We try to be three things

    in our coverage (not just in ourtech coverage):

    Broad

    Deep

    A filter

  • 8/9/2019 Tom Standage, the Economist - Media Connected

    26/49

  • 8/9/2019 Tom Standage, the Economist - Media Connected

    27/49

    2. How we do it > Broad

    Overview of the field

    What other companies aredoing this? Look at whole field.

    How long has the idea beenaround? What is new?

    What are its prospects, really?

    (Eg: portable fuel cells,biometrics, videoconferencing)

  • 8/9/2019 Tom Standage, the Economist - Media Connected

    28/49

    2. How we do it > Broad

    Cross-industry comparisons

    Can help to identify trends orpotential pitfalls

    (Eg: Dotcoms and clean-tech;airlines and telecoms; cars andphones; social networks and

    early ISPs)

  • 8/9/2019 Tom Standage, the Economist - Media Connected

    29/49

    2. How we do it > Broad

    International comparisons

    What happened in othercountries? Policies? Socialfactors?

    Evidence from X suggests

    (Eg: telecoms deregulation,

    broadband in South Korea,3G in Japan)

  • 8/9/2019 Tom Standage, the Economist - Media Connected

    30/49

    2. How we do it > Broad

    Historical comparisons

    Analogies can help toexplain or predict

    (Eg: telegraph and internet:World peace? Hype? Hackers?)

  • 8/9/2019 Tom Standage, the Economist - Media Connected

    31/49

    2. How we do it > Deep

    Deeper coverage: more

    technical detail, not hand-waving

    Our readers have an appetite foran extra level of detail

    Detail can be added withoutusing more complex language

  • 8/9/2019 Tom Standage, the Economist - Media Connected

    32/49

    2. How we do it > Deep

    The problem with this design was that

    during recharging, the metallic lithium

    reformed unevenly at the negativeelectrode, creating spiky structures called

    dendrites that are unstable and

    reactive, and can pierce the separator

    and cause an explosion. So today's

    rechargeable lithium-ion batteries do not

    contain lithium in metallic form. Insteadthey use materials with lattice structures

    for both positive and negative electrodes.

    As the battery discharges, the lithium

    ions swim from the negative-electrode

    lattice to the positive one; during

    recharging, they swim back again. Thisto-and-fro approach is called a rocking

    chair design.

  • 8/9/2019 Tom Standage, the Economist - Media Connected

    33/49

    2. How we do it > Deep

    Analogies can help

    The trick is to simplify in a way

    that helps novices yet does notoffend experts in the field

    We often ask experts for helpwhen choosing an analogy

  • 8/9/2019 Tom Standage, the Economist - Media Connected

    34/49

    2. How we do it > Deep

    Roberto Padovani, Qualcomms chief technology

    officer, explains the difference between theseapproaches by analogy with a dinner-party

    conversation. FDMA is akin to a party at which

    everybody talks simultaneously, but each pair of

    speakers converses at a different musical pitch,

    from booming bass to piping treble. A rota systemin which party-goers took turns to speak would be

    like TDMA. And everybody talking at once, only in

    different languages (so that other conversations

    are rendered incomprehensible), would beequivalent to the spread-spectrum approach, by

    now dubbed CDMA.

  • 8/9/2019 Tom Standage, the Economist - Media Connected

    35/49

    2. How we do it > Deep

    We boffinise technical stories to

    check that they are accurate

    Virtuous circle: more accuracymeans better access

    And we can always ignoreboffins comments if we choose

  • 8/9/2019 Tom Standage, the Economist - Media Connected

    36/49

    2. How we do it > Filter

    One of the most important things

    we do is ignore stories, and actas a filter

    Be sceptical, but not cynical

    Miracle-cure stories look good,but undermine credibility

  • 8/9/2019 Tom Standage, the Economist - Media Connected

    37/49

    2. How we do it > Filter

    PR firms are very active in IT in

    particular; more filtering needed

    Is their client the best example,or just the most accessible?

    Good PRs will admit that theirclients rivals exist

  • 8/9/2019 Tom Standage, the Economist - Media Connected

    38/49

    2. How we do it > Filter

    We only run six tech stories a

    week, plus TQ every quarter

    Vital, not urgent

    When we ask readers if they

    want TQ to be longer, they sayno. They rely on us to filter

  • 8/9/2019 Tom Standage, the Economist - Media Connected

    39/49

    3. The future: Where tech

    journalism is going

  • 8/9/2019 Tom Standage, the Economist - Media Connected

    40/49

    3. Where tech journalism is going

    In the 1840s

    The Economist

    incorporated the

    Railway Monitor

    Nothing lasts forever!

  • 8/9/2019 Tom Standage, the Economist - Media Connected

    41/49

    3. Where tech journalism is going

    In 2006 readers started to ask for

    more coverage of alternativeenergy -- not the internet

    This is clearly the next big thing

    Climate change is a tech story-- the biggest in history

  • 8/9/2019 Tom Standage, the Economist - Media Connected

    42/49

    3. Where tech journalism is going

    One point of view: peak in 2013

    (The next bubble: Priming the markets for

    tomorrow's big crash. By Eric Janszen. HarpersMagazine, February 2008)

  • 8/9/2019 Tom Standage, the Economist - Media Connected

    43/49

    3. Where tech journalism is going

    Computing/telecoms is no longer

    the only definition of the techindustry

    So start learning about batteries,fuel cells, solar panels, ethanol,

    wind, wave, nuclear, etc

  • 8/9/2019 Tom Standage, the Economist - Media Connected

    44/49

    3. Where tech journalism is going

    History (dotcom bubble)

    suggests broad adoption willoccur after bubble bursts

    The fight against climate changewill involve lots of technology

    that will need to be explained.No silver bullet; a portfolio

  • 8/9/2019 Tom Standage, the Economist - Media Connected

    45/49

    3. Where tech journalism is going

    Debates raging around:

    Cap and trade v carbon tax

    Biofuels v food

    Clean-tech subsidiesGM crops

    Geoengineering

    Plenty of explaining to do

  • 8/9/2019 Tom Standage, the Economist - Media Connected

    46/49

    3. Where tech journalism is going

    Biotechnology will probably be

    part of the solution:GM crops

    Fuel from artificial life-forms

    And biotechnology is heating up

    anyway. So learn about that, too

  • 8/9/2019 Tom Standage, the Economist - Media Connected

    47/49

    3. Where tech journalism is going

    The good news for tech

    journalists who know aboutcomputers:

    Alternative energy and biotechdepend on a foundation of IT

    (smart grids, DNA analysis)-- so you have a head start

  • 8/9/2019 Tom Standage, the Economist - Media Connected

    48/49

    3. Where tech journalism is going

    I am an optimist

    If we do our jobs right, we can

    help to fix the problem

    I am looking forward to the future

    -- see you there!

  • 8/9/2019 Tom Standage, the Economist - Media Connected

    49/49

    Why technology journalism matters

    Tom Standage, The Economist

    January 17th 2009