Tom Lawler Tries and Fails Again FCUSA

download Tom Lawler Tries and Fails Again FCUSA

of 10

Transcript of Tom Lawler Tries and Fails Again FCUSA

  • 8/10/2019 Tom Lawler Tries and Fails Again FCUSA

    1/10

  • 8/10/2019 Tom Lawler Tries and Fails Again FCUSA

    2/10

  • 8/10/2019 Tom Lawler Tries and Fails Again FCUSA

    3/10

    8. For 10 years, Defendant, Thomas John Lawler has successfully operated its

    companyFREEDOMFOUNDATION LLC (FFUSA) in all 50states. It has designed a simple

    administrative procedure utilizing the Uniform Commercial Code (UCC) whereby member

    participants are provided a remedy to be compensated for fraudulent bank loans and IRS

    payments. Since the US bankruptcy of 1933 and the extraction of Gold and Silver from the

    people,"real money" was replacedwith"fiatmoney" throughHJR192by FDR.

    9. To support these fiat dollars, each individual'sbirth certificate was pledged as

    valueto theworld cestui que trustprovidingeachindividual aCAPITALIZED NAME, as their

    beneficiaryname. Thus, whenborrowing froma FederalReserveBank, the alleged borrower's

    signature on the promissory note is the banks authorization through the FED to exchange the

    notefor the trust "money"giving the illusion the bank had loaned their ownhands. This is the

    basisforthe notarial protestprocess.

    10. Additionally, the IRS came into existence to collect the interest on the borrowed

    "fiat"money by the US govemment by the FED. Since it is unconstitutional to tax income on

    wagessince it is not an apportioned tax, the IRS"codes" each filer's master file andcreatesan

    offshoreaddressfor them (often Puerto Rico) and changesthe filersoccupation to ATFsales

    (Alcohol,Tobacco or Firearms)whichis a taxable offshore occupation. This is thebasisfor the

    IRSnotarial protestprocess.

    11. Theprocessutilizes a notary who certifies thateachof three notices hasbeensent

    tothe respective bank orIRS.Thesenotices detailtypicallythirtyplus offenses committed by the

    bankor IRS in their loan creation and collectionschemes.Each notice contains aclaim amount

    basedon the amount of monies paid to the institution: for banks principle and interest paid; for

    theIRStaxesand fines paid. The notaryfiirthercertifies i fanyresponsesare returnedwithviable

    defensesof the challenges presented to them on a point by pointbasis.To date, no bank or IRS

    responsehas properly refuted a single item nor the penaltyassessment for compensatory andpunitive damages. Since anunreftitednotice stands as truth, the notary, under the UCC rules

    administersa notarial protest creating adefaultjudgmentforthe amount stated in the notice.

    12. Since the corporate US Govemment is still i n chapter 11 bankruptcy, the

    judgment's claim is then submitted to the US Treasury with supporting documentation for

    3

    Case 1:14-cv-02468-AT Document 29 Filed 10/10/14 Page 3 of 10

  • 8/10/2019 Tom Lawler Tries and Fails Again FCUSA

    4/10

    payment under the bankruptcy. This entire process of the notarial protest and subsequent

    payment is referred to in this document as anAdministrativeRemedy (AR).

    13. It has takenFREEDOM FOUNDATIONUSA LLC(FFUSA) 9 ofthese 10years

    to discover the pathway to paytheseclaims and has been mailing and faxing the US Treasury

    Secretary Jack Lew and President Barack Obama repeatedly this last year. Do to the

    bureaucracyof the govemmental system, it took support fi-om IMFhead Christine Legarde, UN

    Secretary-General,BanKi-Moon and US UN Ambassador, Samantha Power to finally reach the

    White House to present ourwinning proposal for Americans. We further understand this has

    beensubmitted to the Intemational Common LawWorldCourt for review and approval by the

    WhiteHouse.

    14. Duringthis developmental periodwith theWhiteHouse and the US Treasury, two

    unfortunate events occurred. First, evidence points to a disgrantled contractor with a 9 year

    history with FFUSA who was bound by her agreement rules to handle disputes through

    Arbitration, sought out the SEC inAfianta,GAwitha sordid tale of untmths and allegations.

    Around thissameperiod, as part of the due dihgence regarding our US Treasury submission for

    claimpayment byFFUSA,we understand the US Treasury contacted a neutral agency to fiirther

    contact theAtlantaSEC for a routine due diligence on the FFUSA operation. It is apparent the

    SEC(Plaintiff)mistook the casual inquiryas a negative and added the ranting of thedisgrantied

    contractor andperhapsa few others tocreateawitchhunt.

    15. The conditions of any member using the FFUSA AR service by contract is there

    are"no refunds" and theprocess is done on a"best efforts"basis. This is furtheraffirmedon

    every member order that theyagree. The award for each claimcan vary by member currently

    between $325,000 and $1,000,000withservice prices ranging from 1000to 10,000. Services

    forearly members varied as to the service price and awardlevelover the years, but theprocess

    mechanicswere consistent as described above.

    16. The Plaintiff, in their overzealous manner took the stories of mismanagement at

    facevaluewithouteven one notice oropportunityto validate or dispute any ofitby FFUSAuntil

    Thomas John Lawler and Diane Jean Lawler were subpoenaed on short notice on or about

    6/20/14and deferred to appearon6/25/14with thePlaintiffrefiisingto provide even one word

    on the issue at hand or who said what. This has continued to this day. The "investigation"

    4

    Case 1:14-cv-02468-AT Document 29 Filed 10/10/14 Page 4 of 10

  • 8/10/2019 Tom Lawler Tries and Fails Again FCUSA

    5/10

    involvedevery bank account managed by Defendantswithstrong inferencesofmisuse orthefto f

    ftinds. The disgruntled contractor's bank account was also present. No other informationwas

    sought.

    17. On July 3 Thomas JohnLawlerreceived a phonemessagefromthePlaintiff,Pat

    Huddleston advising the SEC wil l be bringing smt against Thomas John Lawler and all

    DefendantLLCs and was given 3 minutes to prepare for a phone conference with JudgeAmy

    Totenberg and himself. The phone conference ensued withno opportunity to read the lawsuit

    nor did itappearJudgeAmy Totenberg had done so. Pat Huddleston announced many of the

    charges insinuating the administrativeprocess constituted selling a security and the lack of

    fiinding (by the US Treasury) constituted fraud then moved to freeze all bank accounts of

    ThomasJohnLawlerand DianeJeanLawler. Thomas JohnLawlercontested this action sighting

    every bookwriter or seller of a "how to book"would be selling securities with such a broad

    definition. JudgeAmy Totenberg sidedwith the railroading of the Defendants and signed the

    TRO freezing all FFUSA and related accounts and most o fVioletBlessings LLC, managed by

    Diane Jean Lawler. Additionally, Judge Amy Totenberg ordered the stopping of all AR

    administrationsetting a hearingdateofAugust8, 2014 for a fiillhearing.

    SUMMARY

    18. Plaintiff repeatedly and wrongfully accused Defendant(s) o f engaging in

    unregistered offering of securities and fraud, alongwithquoting standardized rhetoric of "the

    Securities Act",which has no application or basis in the matter at hand since the offering

    Defendant(s) refer to is no more than a simple contract for service and educational process, with

    NOpromiseofresuhsother than abestefforts administrativeperformance.Muchlikethat o f any

    serviceprovider, there surely is a cost for service performedwhichmay or may not bebasedon

    thesumtotaland/orworkperformed.For example, acollectionagency may be paid to collect or

    negotiate a sum certain on behalf of another, and whose fee for service may be charged ordeductedand may bebasedon the collectable amount.Wouldthis contract for service be akinto

    an "investment" or "security"? Wethinknot. The collectorsimplyperforms a service butdoes

    notpromise orguaranteeresults. Nonetheless, the service provider is stillpaid for their service.

    The Defendant(s) are in that category as a service provider.

    5

    Case 1:14-cv-02468-AT Document 29 Filed 10/10/14 Page 5 of 10

  • 8/10/2019 Tom Lawler Tries and Fails Again FCUSA

    6/10

    19. So as not torestatea large part or all of the actionfiledbyPlaintiffin the UNITED

    STATES DISTRICTCOURT FOR THENORTHERN DISTRICT OF GEORGIAATLA NTA

    DIVISION, westatethe true facts and authorities as they apply tothese contracts andprocesses

    in question: The Contracts are MEMBERSHIP AGREEMENTS NOT INVESTOR

    AGREEMENTS.They include various terms and conditions andCLUBbenefits. One benefit is

    the ADMINISTRATIVE REMEDY referred to as AR (this being the portion apparently being

    misconstruedas the "investment'V'security" part and"fraud").The AR is an educationalprocess

    and fee for service with no promise of resuhs or efficacy. A CLUB MEMBER (NOT

    INVESTOR) may choosetoengageand in doing so they themselves must provide all true and

    correctinformation, includingany amount of monetary remedy they deem as due. Defendant(s)

    merelyprovide administrative services that include, and are notlimitedto, thewellknown, long

    standing, well defined and lawftiUyutilized, NOTARIAL PROTEST process. NOTARIAL

    PROTEST,as defined inBLACK'S LAW DICTIONARYFIRSTEDITION:

    "PROTEST.2. A notarial act, being aformal statement

    in writingmadeby a notary under hissealo foffice,at

    therequestof the holder of abil lor note, inwhich such

    billor note is described, and it is declared that thesame

    was on a certain day presented for payment, (or

    acceptance,as thecasemay be,) and that such payment

    or acceptance was refused, and stating the reasons,i f

    any, given for such refiisal, whereupon the notaryprotests against all parties to such instrument, and

    declaresthat theywi l lbe held responsible for all loss or

    damagearisingfrom its dishonor."

    20. Since the definitions of "Investment" and "Security" are so broad, the authorities

    utilizethesephrases/law as a catch-all whenever convenient, aswellas thewidelyused "Howey

    Test",as they used in this matter, again, as a standardized catch-all. The "Howey Test"doesnot

    applyas the contracts in question do not meet atleast3o fthe 4 prongs of thetest:There is no 1)

    investment money, 2) due to an expectation of profits,since there are none, 3) there is a common

    enterpriseobligated to cure the judgmentsprocessed,which is theUnited StatesDepartment of

    Treasury and 4) does NOT depend solely on the efforts of a third party but on individual

    education, the accuracy ofinformationprovided for administration byeachindividual engaging

    in the processbased on same, and The United States Department of Treasury and what they

    deemis just and proper ineachindividual instance.

    6

    Case 1:14-cv-02468-AT Document 29 Filed 10/10/14 Page 6 of 10

  • 8/10/2019 Tom Lawler Tries and Fails Again FCUSA

    7/10

    21. In addition, the services and educational process in question, as well as other

    CLUBBENEFITS, are availableONLY toCLUB MEMBERSand NOTofferedor available to

    thegeneralpublic.One mustchooseto become aCLUB MEMBER (NOT INVESTOR)i n order

    to take advantage of any CLUBBENEFITS of their choosing. The CLUB does not offeror

    engagein investments or securities.

    22. These frozen assets are essential for staff payroll, commissions, rent, phone,

    websites,ISPs, etc. to carry on the many otheraspectsof our business. FFUSA is an operation

    of 10,000 memberships encompassing about 20,000 people. We need to continue to service

    them and complete the fmal fiinding bringing trillions of dollars to a severely struggling

    economy. FFUSA'shandshave been severely and unconscionablytiedby this TRO and suit.

    23. This TRO and Civil Action No. l:14-CV-2468-AT in the UNITED STATES

    DISTRICTCOURTFORTHE NORTHERN DISTRICTOFGEORGIAATLANTA DIVISION

    must be terminatedIMMEDIATELY withprejudice.

    24. A Papal APOSTOLIC LETTER was issued MOTU PROPRIO, by the Supreme

    PontiffFrancis, on M y 11 2013,effectiveSeptember 1, 2013.APOSTOLIC LETTERdeclared

    theneed "for the international community to adopt adequate legal instruments toprevent and

    counter criminal activities, by promoting international judicial cooperation on criminal

    matters". The criminality of crimes against humanity and terrorism cannot be disputed

    (EXHIBITA)

    25. Plaintiff is being noticed, on the record, of the seriousnessof their actions and the

    harmbeing perpetrated on the very people theypurportedlywishto protect and o f the revocation

    of their pubhc servant immunities. Said revocation of immunitiesplaces each public servant

    personally liable for their ownindividualand collective actions or lack thereof, and the ensuing

    actionand penalties fortheir continued disregardofwaming.

    26. To date, to thebestof my knowledge,Plaintiffhave failedto resolve this matter

    and Defendant(s) have not been made whole requiring immediate and complete settlement and

    dismissal of this matter. Plaintiff continues to inflictgreat harm upon Defendant(s) rendering

    themunable to conductbusinessindividuallyand severally by and throughPlaintiff(s)TRO and

    assetfreeze o f bank accounts, Limited LiabilityCompanies, aswellas causing irrevocable harm

    7

    Case 1:14-cv-02468-AT Document 29 Filed 10/10/14 Page 7 of 10

  • 8/10/2019 Tom Lawler Tries and Fails Again FCUSA

    8/10

    byway ofdefamationof character and slanderous, false allegations results ofwhichmay never

    be erased.

    (ECONOMIC AND OTHER CRIMES AGAINST HUMANITY) .

    PURSUANT TO PAPAL APOSTOLIC L E T T E R E F F E C T I V E 1. SEPTEMBER 2013

    ISSUED MOTU

    27. TheAPOSTOLIC LETTER issued 11 July2013and effectiveas of 1, September

    2013clearly puts forththemeansto prevent and counter criminalactivities that threaten human

    dignityand the common good andpeace,includingbut notlimited to, economic crimes and other

    crimes against humanity as wellas terrorism. In addition, it strips away immunities that pubhc

    servantshavelongh id behind and now makes them personally liable for their own personal and

    collectiveactions or lack thereof.

    28. Crimes Against Humanity is well defmed on an intemationallevel. Intemational

    legal precedent is verywell established by and through previous legal actions and ralings too

    numerous to count. As an example, one may look to other intemational courts such as the

    IntemationalCriminalCourt(ICC) whichwas established as a permanent tribunal(among many

    other intemational courts and tribunals) to prosecute individuals for genocide, crimes against

    humanity,war crimes and other crimes.

    29. As a direct result ofPlaintiffs actions, Defendant(s) have been subject to financial

    devastation, cessation ofabilityto administiativelyassistin curingvalid outstanding judgments

    (thereby harming thousands of people) and effectivelymining the excellent reputation,some

    very longstanding, ofDefendant(s).Defendant(s) are responsible for creating serious economic

    and mental anguish and harm.

    TERRORISM)

    PURSUANT TO PAPAL APOSTOLIC L E T T E R E F F E C T I V E 1.SEPTEMBER 2013

    ISSUED MOTU PROPRIO

    30. TheAPOSTOLICLETTER issued 11 July 2013 and effectiveas of 1, September

    2013clearly puts forththemeansto prevent and counter criminalactivities that threaten human

    dignityand the common good andpeace,includingbut notlimited to, economic and other crimes

    8

    Case 1:14-cv-02468-AT Document 29 Filed 10/10/14 Page 8 of 10

  • 8/10/2019 Tom Lawler Tries and Fails Again FCUSA

    9/10

    againsthumanity as well as terrorism. In addition, it strips away immunities that publicservants

    havelong hid behind and nowmakesthem personally liablefortheir own personal and collective

    actionsor lack thereof

    31. Since 1994, the United Nations General Assembly has repeatedly condemnedterroristactsusing thefollowingpoliticaldescriptionofterrorism:

    "Criminalacts intended or calculated to provoke astateof terror in the general

    public,a group ofpersonsor particularpersonsfor pohticalpurposesare in any

    circumstance unjustifiable, whatever the considerations of a political,

    philosophical,ideological, racial, ethnic, religious or any other nature that may

    beinvoked tojustifythem."

    32. As a direct resuh ofPlaintiff actions, Defendant(s) are subject to severe lossof

    businessand otherdamages,and has sufferedseriousfinancial and mental anguish and harm.

    R E L I E F

    Asa result ofPlaintiffsactions.Defendantseeksthefollowingrelief:

    3

    3.

    An order for dismissalwithprejudice.

    34. An order for immediatereleaseofallfrozen funds.

    35. An order for compensatory andpunitivedamagesof $100,000.

    36.

    An order for immediate publication of error and admission ofsamein the court and

    published in the public record by way o flocaland national media.

    37. Courtfeesand any and allcostsof this action against the Defendants; and,

    38. Any other reliefthe courtdeemsjust and proper.

    Dated this f dayofAugust,2014.

    IslThomas J Lawler

    9

    Case 1:14-cv-02468-AT Document 29 Filed 10/10/14 Page 9 of 10

  • 8/10/2019 Tom Lawler Tries and Fails Again FCUSA

    10/10

    efinitions (as d e f i n e d i no t h e r i n t e r n a t i o n a l c o u r t s ,not

    n e c e s s a r i l y common lawc o u r t s , bu t todemonstrateth e use as a

    worldwide standard).

    Crimes A g a i n s t Humanity-"Crimes a g a i n s t h u m a n i t y " i n c l u d eany o f

    t h e f o l l o w i n g a c t s c o m m i t t e dasp a r tof aw i d e s p r e a dor systematic

    a t t a c k d i r e c t e d a g a i ns t anyc i v i l i a n p o p u l a t i o n , w i t h knowledgeo f

    t h e a t t a c k :

    murder;

    e x t e r m i n a t i o n ;

    e n s l a v e m e n t ;

    d e p o r t a t i o no rf o r c i b l e t r a n s f e r o fp o p u l a t i o n ;

    i m p r i s o n m e n t ;

    t o r t u r e ;

    rape, sexual sl ave ry , enforc ed p r o s t i t u t i o n , f o r c e d pregnancy,

    e n f o r c e d s t e r i l i z a t i o n , or anyoth er form o fsexual vi ol en ce

    o f comparable g r a v i t y ;

    p e r s e c u t i o n a g a i n s t ani d e n t i f i a b l e g r o u pon p o l i t i c a l ,

    r a c i a l , n a t i o n a l , e t h n i c , c u l t u r a l , r e l i g i o u s orgend er

    grounds;

    e n f o r c e d d i s a p p e a r a n c eo fperson s;

    t h ecrime o fa p a r t h e i d ;

    o t h e r inhumane a c t s of a s i m i l a r c h a r a c t er i n t e n t i o n a l l y

    c a u s i n g g r e at s u f f e r i n g ors e r i o u s b o d i l y ormental i n j u r y .

    T e r r o r i s m - The i n t e r n a t i o n a l communityhasbeen s l o wt of o r m u l a t ea

    u n i v e r s a l l y a g r e e d , l e g a l l y b i n d i n g d e f i n i t i o n o ft h i s crime. These

    d i f f i c u l t i e s a r i s e f r o m the f a c t t h a t the t er m " t e r r o r i s m "i s

    p o l i t i c a l l y ande m o t i o n a l l y charged.

    S i n c e 1994, th e Unit ed Nations G e n e r a l Assembly has r e p e a t e d l y

    condemned t e r r o r i s t acts using thef o l l o w i n g p o l i t i c a l d e s c r i p t i o n

    o f t e r r o r i s m :

    " C r i m i n a l acts intended o r c a l c u l a t e dt op r o v o k e a s t a t e

    o f t e r r o r i n theg e n e r a l p u b l i c , a g r o u p o f p e r s o n sor

    p a r t i c u l a r p e r s o n s f o rp o l i t i c a l p u r p o s e s are i n any

    c i r c u m s t a n c e u n j u s t i f i a b l e w h a t e v e r th ec o n s i d e r a t i o n so f

    a p o l i t i c a l , p h i l o s o p h i c a l , i d e o l o g i c a l , r a c i a l , e t h n i c ,

    r e l i g i o u s or any othe r natu re t h a t may be invoked t o

    j u s t i f y them."

    We l o o k t o the Common Law I n t e r n a t i o n a l Wor ld Court t ob r o a d e nt he

    e x i s t i n g vague d e f i n i t i o n of " t e r r o r i s m " t o i n c l u d e " f i n a n c i a l

    t e r r o r i s m . "

    2 DEFENDANT S) (Known D e f e n d a n t s ) as l i s t e d i n p a r a g r a p h 2.

    h e r e i n )

    10

    Case 1:14-cv-02468-AT Document 29 Filed 10/10/14 Page 10 of 10