Tolled Road - Past, Present & Future

8/3/2019 Tolled Road - Past, Present & Future

http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/tolled-road-past-present-future 1/43

BEST PRACTICES IN CONSTRUCTIONINDUSTRY SEMINAR (BPCI 2008)

“ TOLLED ROAD-PAST, PRESENT &FUTURE “

By:

Y. Bhg. Dato’ Ir. Haji Mohamad Razali B. OthmanDirector General

Malaysian Highway Authority



CONTENT

-INTRODUCTION

-HIGHWAY DEVELOPMENT

-PAST

-PRESENT-FUTURE

-CONCLUSION



INTRODUCTION

• Road privatization policy started in 1983

North Klang Straits Bypass (NKSB) By Shapadu Comp. Ltd. (1983)

Jalan Kuching Highway by Kamunting Corporation (1986)

North – South Expressway (1989)



HIGHWAY DEVELOPMENT

219

485

960

1,220

1,507

0

200

400

600

800

1000

1200

1400

1600

81-85 (4th

plan)

86-90 (5th

Plan)

91-95 (6th

Plan)

96-00 (7th

Plan)

01-05 (8th

Plan)

Period of Malaysian Plan

T o t a l l e

n g t h ( k m )



Total Road Length in Malaysia ('000 km)

10.4

77.2

14.5

64.3 65.2

18.0

38.9

-

20.0

40.0

60.0

80.0

100.0

55 65 75 85 95 99 `07

Year

T o t a l L e n g t h

( ' 0 0 0 k m )

From the Bar chart showed the increase of the road length in Malaysia (excluding

rural & village road) from 66,391 kilometers to 77,240 kilometers in 2007.



PAST

• Federal Government decided to embark

construction of a toll expressway (1977)

• The decision was based on :

From Bukit Kayu Hitam to Johor Bahru known as

North – South Expressway

•The general Transportation Study of Malaysia (1967-1968)

•The Malaysian Highway feasibility Study (1970-1971)

•Feasibility study and Toll Application (1977-1979)



MAIN OBJECTIVE

HAVING THE

HIGHWAY

Provide an efficient network

system of highway

Accelerate economic growth

Supplement the existing

Federal Route 1

Help to alleviate traffic

congestion along Federal

Route 1

Facilitate fast anduninterrupted movement of

traffic

Provide a smooth,

comfortable and safe ride

Using international standards

•Able to reduce vehicle operating

cost

•

Reduce traveling time



PRESENT

TOLL HIGHWAYS

Under Planning:

•2 nos of highway

Under Construction:

•7 nos of highway

Under Operation:

•23 highways operated by 17Concession Company



Bil HighwayRoute No.

Highway Length

1. E1 North – South Expressway 823.0 Km

2. E36 Penang Bridge 13.5 Km

3. E8 Kuala Lumpur –

Karak Highway 60.0 Km4. E15 Butterworth – Kulim Expressway 16.8 Km

5. E5 Shah Alam Expressway 35.0 Km

6. E6 North – South Expressway Central Link 48.0 Km

7. E29 Seremban – Port Dickson Expressway 22.7 Km

8. E3 Malaysian – Singapore SecondCrossing Expressway

44.7 Km

9. E11 Damansara – Puchong Highway. 40.0 Km

10. E7 Cheras – Kajang Highway 11.7 Km

11. E9 Sungai Besi Expressway 16.7 Km

Highway In Operation :



Cont..Highway In Operation :

Bil HighwayRoute No.

Highway Length

12. E12 Kuala Lumpur – Ampang Elevated Highway 7.4 Km

13. E23 Western Kuala Lumpur Traffic DispersalScheme

26.0 Km

14. E18 Kajang Traffic Dispersal Ring Road 37.0 Km

15. E10 New Pantai Expressway 19.6 Km

16. E35 Shah Alam – Kuang Expressway 25.0 Km

17. E8 East Coast Highway (Phase1) 169.0 Km

18. E30 North Klang Straits Bypass 8.0 Km

19. E30 New North Klang Straits Bypass 7.5 Km20. E17 Butterworth Outer Ring Road 12.1 Km

21. E38 Storm Water Management And Road Tunnel(SMART)

3.06 Km

22.- Jln Cheras, Sambungan Timur-Barat,

Lebuhraya Sungai Besi (Lebuhraya Metramac)25.0 Km

23. E20 Kuala Lumpur – Putrajaya Highway 26.0 Km

TOTAL LENGTH : 1507.56 Km




NORTH - SOUTH EXPRESSWAY (PLUS) ( 848 KM )

TOLL PLAZAS - OPEN 7 NOS., CLOSED - 60 NOS.



(before upgrading)

KUALA LUMPUR - KARAK HIGHWAY (KL-KARAK) ( 60 KM )

TOLL PLAZAS (OPEN) - 2 NOS.




WESTERN KL TRAFFIC DISPERSAL SCHEME (SPRINT) (26 KM)

TOLL PLAZAS – 3 NOS. INTERCHANGES – 13 NOS.




AMPANG-KL ELEVATED HIGHWAY (AKLEH) ( 7.4 KM )

TOLL PLAZAS OPEN -1 NO.




PRESENT CONSTRUCTION

• Most of present toll highways – urban area

• Through heavily populated area

•

Mitigation measure needed in solvingproblem



• ENVIRONMENTAL PROBLEM (SENAI – DESARU

EXPRESSWAY)

MITIGATION MEASURES:

•Safeguarding water Catchment from contaminated spillage

SDE highway alignment traverses through Sg. Layang Water Catchment

Pollutant Removal System (PRS) sited at strategic location

The objective to remove the chemical/pollutants from the surface runoff,

preventing them from reaching the water catchment

PRS essentially comprises 4 component:-Grass Swale

Grass Pollutant Trap

Oil / grease / chemical Filtration

Retention




Pollutant Removal System

Process



•LAND USE PROBLEM

•Land scarcity

•

Space constraint – urban area

•Increase usage of highway by local commuter – cause congestion

•The experience of dealing with the problem:-

•DUKE Highway

•SPRINT Highway



• DUKE HIGHWAY PROJECTMITIGATION MEASURES:

LIMITATION OF RIGHT OF WAY (R.O.W)

Redesigning the

drainage system to

suite the R.O.W

condition



• DUKE HIGHWAY PROJECTMITIGATION MEASURES:


Application of

Reinforcement

Concrete wall for a

spacious carriageway



ii) Reconfiguration of InterchangesMITIGATION MEASURES:


•Reconfiguration of interchanges

(eg: Sentul Pasar Interchange)•Advantages :-

•No acquisition for drainage

reserve

•Providing free flow of water

•No interfacing with flood

mitigation structure

*Interchange Design to skirt around the Existing detention pond by JPS as a flood

mitigation measure



iii) Sharing of TNB power line reserveMITIGATION MEASURES:


Existing Reserve = 40 m

13.4 m10 m

13.4 m

1.6m1.6m

6 m

6 m

6 m

12 m

•Original proposal – separate reserve

for highway and TNB power lines

•Benefits:-

•29 houses & 5 shops not to be

acquired

•

Live line maintenance from thedeck



• SPRINT HIGHWAY PROJECTMITIGATION MEASURES:

•Designed using innovative methods to minimise land use and disruption to

the environment during construction.

•700 m Bored tunneling construction

method through a hill as a direct

access through Penchala

•To preserve the ecology and

environmental



• SPRINT HIGHWAY PROJECTMITIGATION MEASURES:

•Designed using innovative methods to minimise land use and disruption to

the environment during construction.

•First in Malaysia to feature double

deck structure



• Traffic congestion problem at toll plazas


•Introduction of Electronic Toll Collection (ETC) occurs after

completion of the NSE in Sept. 1994.

•

Earlier stage of implementation, less number of highway usersusing this system.

•Number had increase yearly due to the increase in number of

highway users which resulted to traffic congestion at toll plazas

especially during peak hours and festive seasons.

•Starting from 1 July 2004, Government decided to use only one

ETC system namely Touch & Go.

•It can be used for other purposes such as public transport and

public parking.



• Traffic congestion problem at toll plazasMITIGATION MEASURES:

0

200

400

600

800

1000

1200

1999 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006

T O T A L T R A F F I C

( m i l l i o n )

YEAR

TNG & Smart Tag

Total Traffic

Comparison between the use of Electronic Toll System (ETC)

and total number of traffic

Only 41%

use ETC

(TnGo &

smart Tag)

ISSUES



Mitigation measures:

•Preparing GuidelineMitigation measures:

•Government compensation

•Re-evaluating C.A and

renegotiate the term


•Coordination between

Government agencies

and private company

•Improve C.A


•Impose penalty

•Established KPI

ISSUES

TOLL

•A sensitive issues and become

major problem in the country

LAND

•Land cost much higher than

estimated in implementation

stage

IMPROVEMENT TO

CONCESSION AGREEMENT

•Set-up committee to re-

evaluate the existing C.A and

improve it.

CONGESTION

•Growth development -

generated traffic &

saturated

•Bottleneck and user’s

behaviour

ISSUES

CUSTOMER

SATISFACTION

•Engage consultant

to get feedback from

customer

80% as a benchmark, improve

some complain and comment

from customer



• Land issue

•Land cost – critical components and big impact to overall project cost

•Planning stage – estimated land cost

•Implementation stage – land cost are higher than estimated•Due to affected lots converted their status (plantation to residential /

commercial)

•Solution :

•MHA currently preparing new guideline in handling the unacceptable increase in

the land cost



•Toll issue

•Sensitive issues and major problem in the country

•Toll rate and frequency toll rate review – agreed in the Concession Agreement (C.A)

•Toll rate agreed – must be sufficient to cover capital expenditure (CAPEX),

operating expenses (OPEX), financial obligations and returns to the promoters.•No increment toll rate as stipulated - Government must compensate

concessionaires

•Major issues – acceptable & affordable toll rate

•Solution:

•Currently MHA re-evaluating all the existing C.A term for affordable toll rate

•Action taken – concession period extension, toll rate restructuring



• Congestion issue

•Congestion contribution:-

•Development in the vicinity of the highway

•Existing bottleneck•Users behavior - weaving

•Effect – stress, waste of fuel, waste of time, emits smoke

•Solution:

•Coordination between government agencies and private company

•Improvement to C.A prior to traffic congestion problem



• Improvement to Concession Agreement

•MHA planning department set-up a committee – to re-evaluate & improve C.A

• Solution:•To impose LAD – project completed as schedule

•To impose penalty – non compliance and non conformity

•Established Key Performance Indicator (KPI) – standardize work performance

•May instruct Concession Company to review the traffic forecast



• Customer (Highway User’s) Satisfaction•Overall satisfaction Index of the Highway for the year 2007 reflected that Malaysian

road users were satisfied (rated as ‘four star’/’good) With scored for all highways

between (66%-85%)

•Survey base on five major area as listed below:

•Highways Management

•Toll Plaza Management

•Ronda Services

•Rest Service Area

•Lay By service

• From the finding, mitigation measures to improves the Costumer Satisfaction Indexwill carried out by Concession company



FUTURE

FLEXIBLE TOLL

SYSTEMS

TRAFFIC MODEL

STUDY

TENDERING OF

NEW HIGHWAY

FLAT TOLL RATE

MULTI LANE FREE

FLOW (MLFF)

SHADOW TOLL

MHA’S TRAFFIC

MONITORING

CENTRE

FUTURE



• Future highway development programme

•Government still embark on privatisation programme through:-

•Build-Operate-Transfer (BOT)•Private Finance Initiative

•Reviewing the Highway Network Development Plan (HNDP)

•Viable project for privatisation

•Impact on National economy



• Flexible Toll Systems

•Toll discount on non peak hour

•10% discount starting 1 Jan 2009 for NSE and ELITE highway

•Discount period from 12.00 am to 7.00am

•Massive traffic congestion due to accident / festivals season



• Flat Toll Rate

•One toll rate until the end of the concession period

•No toll rate increment



• Multi Lane free Flow (MLFF)

•Latest toll electronic collecting system in Malaysia

•Will encourage smooth traffic movement

•Capacity of peak hour transition rate – 2200 vehicle per lane per hour

•Government in process of trial – December 2008•Toll Plaza Penchala, Damansara – Puchong Highway

•Toll Plaza Batu 3, federal Highway 2

•Expert involved in the trial:-

•Mitsubishi Group and Kapsch Com

•Objective of the trial:-

•Study system effectiveness in term of safety and practicality aspect



• Shadow Toll

•Has been implemented in several countries in Europe

•Modified version need to be look before applying in Malaysia

•Method:-

•No toll paying by user at toll booth

•Government pay to the Company based on number of traffic



• Tendering of new Highway in Malaysia

•Implementing an open tender concept for new privatized highway

•To ensure transparency – reasonable and competitive price



• Traffic Model study for Klang Valley and its

conurbation

•A study for the new traffic model

•Basically to develop Traffic Demand Forecasting Model

•Finding and analysis – Land use, Socio-economic Framework, traffic survey

•Will assist Government in evaluating and choosing viable road project



• MHA Traffic Monitoring Centre

•Collecting and disseminating traffic

information in real time basis on toll

highway to the public

CONCLUSION



CONCLUSION

•Improvement have been done to make sure the toll highway are built of the best

quality, maintain and operated in the best conditions.

•Continuous negotiation and discussion between Government and Concession

Company in all stages are an important for the successful of project.

•Innovation and optimisation in the design, construction, operation and maintenance

has resulted in having a highway of the best quality and at reasonable price.

•When dealing in urban construction – need to reduce impact on social and

environmental.

•Win-win situation between Government and Private sector:

•Government – get infrastructure early, quality•Private sector – get the reasonable return from the investment

•Future- to fulfill the customer satisfaction

•Way forward-MHA TMC as a National Traffic Information Centre

•MHA as a Public Sector Comparator (PSC) to concession companies



THANK YOUTHANK YOU

TERIMA KASIH

Tolled Road - Past, Present & Future

Documents

Transcript of Tolled Road - Past, Present & Future