Today 1. Presentation 2. Break 3. Discussion of Readings 4. Assignment 1 CSR Symbols
description
Transcript of Today 1. Presentation 2. Break 3. Discussion of Readings 4. Assignment 1 CSR Symbols
Today1. Presentation
2. Break 3. Discussion of Readings
4. Assignment 1 CSR Symbols
Content1. CSR Definitions
2. Related Concepts
3. Drivers of CSR
4. Carroll’s Theoretical Framework
5.General Framework
Academic (1)
Friedman (1962)
There is one and only one social responsibility for business – to use its resources and engage in activities designed to increase its profits so long as it stays within the rules of the game, which is to say, engages in open and free competition without deception or fraud
Only individuals can have social responsibilities
Social progress (e.g. health, longevity, etc.) is a consequence of free enterprise and free trade
1 – CSR Definitions
Academic (2)
Carroll (1979) The social responsibility of business encompasses the
1) economic, 2) legal, 3) ethical and 4) discretionary
expectations that society has of organizations at a given point in time
1 – CSR Definitions
Academic (3)
Porter & Kramer (2006) Strategy & Society: The Link Between Competitive Advantage and Corporate Social Responsibility, Harvard Business Review
The shared value model: idea that corporate success and social welfare are interdependent
– Businesses needs an educated workforce, sustainable resources and a robust government to compete effectively, whereas
– Society needs profitable and competitive businesses to create jobs, income, tax revenues, and wealth for all
The “Creating Shared Value” approach (CSV) focuses on building a social value proposition into corporate strategy
Examples of companies linking strategy and CSR in the article
1 – CSR Definitions
Academic (4)
Epstein (2008)
CSR relates primarily to achieving outcomes from organizational decisions concerning specific issues or problems, which by some normative standard have beneficial rather than adverse effects upon pertinent corporate stakeholders
The normative correctness of the products of corporate action have been the main focus of CSR …
1 – CSR Definitions
International Institutions (1) European Commission (MEMO/09/109 issued on 16/03/2009) CSR is “a concept whereby companies integrate social and environmental concerns in their business operations and in their
interaction with their stakeholders on a voluntary basis” This approach is consistent with the EU's so-called Lisbon Strategy
“CSR is always about going beyond the law”
“Ideally, CSR is a win-win scenario, whereby companies increase their profitability and society benefits at the same time”
1 – CSR Definitions
International Institutions (2)
World Bank (WB)
[CSR is] the commitment of business to contribute to sustainable economic development, working with
– employees, – their families, – the local community and – society at large
to improve quality of life in ways that are both good for business and good for development
1 – CSR Definitions
Networks (1)
International Institute for Sustainable Development (IISD)
CSR should be seen as the way that firms – working with those most affected by their decisions (often called “stakeholders”) – can develop innovative and economically viable products, processes and services within core business processes, resulting in improved environmental protection and social conditions ...
1 – CSR Definitions
Networks (2) ASEAN’s CSR Network
(Association of South-East Asian Nations)
CSR requires a legal framework that promotes openness, partnerships and democratization
Aim: to help bring about shared prosperity and a sustainable future to the ASEAN region (Brunei, Burma / Myanmar, Cambodia, Laos and Vietnam); to promote community building by promoting close collaboration among the business sector, civil society, academia and other stakeholders in the region
1 – CSR Definitions
Networks (3)
UNIDO’s Regional CSR Network (United Nations Industrial Development Organization)
Ensures that CSR supports, and does not undermine, the development of small and medium sized enterprises (SMEs) in developing countries as it is crucial for meeting the goal of improving the impact of business on society
1 – CSR Definitions
Example of a Company Website
Bloomberg Businessweek:
Corporate social responsibility is a way of managing a business by considering the impact of activities on – customers, – suppliers, – employees, – shareholders, – communities and other stakeholders, and – the environment
1 – CSR Definitions
Questions
Can you identify some major differences between all these definitions?
Are there common points shared by all of them?
What are the possible problems related to having such a vast array of CSR definitions?
Taking into consideration the geographic region where you come from, which would be the most relevant one?
1 – CSR Definitions
Responsibility / Responsiveness
Corporate social responsibility – emphasizes obligation and accountability to society
Corporate social responsiveness – emphasizes action, activity
Corporate social responsiveness is a business's capacity to respond to social pressures
This suggests the ability of a business organization to survive through adaptation to its business environment
The term is an inclusive and global concept which embraces the complete spectrum of socially beneficial activities of business
2 – Related Concepts
Corporate Social Performance: Principles, Processes and Outcomes
Wood, 1991: Corporate social performance is “a business organization’s configuration of principles of social responsibility, processes of social responsiveness, and policies, programs and other observable outcomes as they relate to the firm’s societal relationships”
This definition was further developed so that each of the three components – principles, processes and outcomes – are each composed of specific elements
2 – Related Concepts
The problem of the CSP – FP link (Corporate Social Performance – Financial Performance)
Does it pay to be ethical? We don’t know Whereas some studies report a positive relationship between ethics and profits, some find a negative relationship and some find the relationship either neutral or mixed
It is hard to draw broad conclusions about the relationship between CSR and profits because the studies often measure different things; Margolis and Walsh (2001) have shown in their summary of 95 studies that CSP is measured in many different ways
There might be a correlation between CSP and FP, but the existence of a causal link has not been proved
McWilliams & Siegel (2001) find that there is a neutral relationship between CSR and FP
2 – Related Concepts
Legitimacy (1) The legitimacy of business is linked to its obligations to
society and to the sanctions that society can apply to business when it fails to live up to these obligations
The most often cited definition is that of Suchman (1995):
“Legitimacy is a generalized perception or assumption that the actions of an entity are desirable, proper, or appropriate within some socially constructed system of norms, values, beliefs, and definitions”
3 – Drivers of CSR
Legitimacy (2) According to the “Iron Law of Responsibility” (Davis):
Economic power entails social responsibility
Society grants legitimacy and power to business; in the long run, those who do not use power in a manner which society considers responsible will lose it
However, some challenge this view because defining the terms of legitimacy as a contested process and the norms of legitimacy are an outcome of power relations
3 – Drivers of CSR
License to Operate
It is usually seen as the approval that companies must obtain from local communities or other stakeholders in areas where they operate (as compared to the legal license they must obtain from governments)
CSR policies, projects or initiatives do help to obtain the social licence to operate
It is crucial notably for extractive industries, which often directly impact local communities by exploiting their land, subsoil, and other resources
A “social licence to operate” is earned by acquiring free, prior and informed consent from indigenous peoples and local
communities
3 – Drivers of CSR
Image / Reputation (1)
The implementation of a CSR approach usually enhances the brand image and reputation of a business
Consequently, over time, it leads to an improvement in sales and customer loyalty
And it also leads to an increased ability to attract and retain (the best) employees
By capitalizing on it, a company can improve its financial performance and attract more investments
3 – Drivers of CSR
Image / Reputation (2)
However, companies are often accused of instrumentalizing CSR to improve their image or reputation
There are serious dangers associated with paying lip service to stakeholders and considering CSR as a mere PR exercise (“greenwashing”, “window dressing”…)
This may cause a loss in credibility and destroy very quickly the company’s image
Whereas building a good reputation takes a long time, tarnishing it is a matter of days or hours…
3 – Drivers of CSR
Image / Reputation (3)
“Greenwashing” happens when disinformation is disseminated by an organization so as to present a (false) environmentally responsible image of itself
Making exaggerated environmental claims in order to obtain consumer favor is one of the worst things a company can do in the eyes of the sustainability community
When a company that has been lauded for its environmental performance is revealed to be engaging in environmentally dangerous practices, it provides skeptics with the fodder they need. Can you think of an example?
Even when the claims are found to be inflated (or impossible to substantiate), credibility is lost
3 – Drivers of CSR
Workplace Issues
Research demonstrates that CSR initiatives have a positive impact on employee morale, motivation, commitment, loyalty, training, recruitment and turnover
Benefits in these areas have been found to improve the bottom line of companies
Three surveys across Europe, the USA and a survey involving 25 countries found employees felt greater loyalty, satisfaction and motivation when their companies were socially responsible
3 – Drivers of CSR
Risk reduction
Companies with non-sustainable supply chains may experience financial, integrity and reputation issues
(e.g. Mattel in 2007 when a supplier used lead-contaminated paint on toys)
Green procurement strategiesPurchasing of green energy, raw materials with a higher recycled content, etc.
“Greening the supply chain” refers to buyer companies requiring a certain level of environmental responsibility in the core business practices of their suppliers and vendors
3 – Drivers of CSR
Reduced internal costs And revenue growth
Energy efficiency, green projects and other eco-friendly initiatives
Implementation of sustainable practices in design, production, distribution and end-of-life management
Enhanced brand reputation
Employee motivation
Customer satisfaction
All these policies, processes and outcomes guarantee savings and increase cost avoidance
3 – Drivers of CSR
4 – Carroll’s CSR Pyramid
5 – General Framework