To Proctor or Not to Proctor: An Evaluation of Exam Formats for the Online Classroom

17
TO PROCTOR OR NOT TO PROCTOR: AN EV ALUATION OF EXAM FORMATS FOR THE ONLINE C LASSROOM JENNIFER LEWIS SLOAN 2013 NOVEMBER 20, 2013

description

This session was presented at the Sloan-C International Conference on Online Learning on November 20, 2013. Abstract: As the online teaching fellow at my college, I have been asked many times how to best assess students in the online format. Many of these inquiries come from other science instructors with concerns ranging from assessment of understanding to academic integrity. I started teaching online in Fall 2011 and have used a variety of assessment methods in my courses, including proctored and online exams. Using data from my own classes, I set out to determine whether a difference existed when using online or proctored exams in the online classroom. Preliminary data were collected from five general geology, seven earth science and three survey of oceanography online courses between Fall 2011 through Fall 2012. These data were used to compare how students performed on different exam formats. The data include students who took two proctored exams for their course, students who took one proctored exam and one online exam and students who took two online exams for their course. The data were used to correlate how a student faired from their first exam to the second exam to see if the exam's format (proctored or online) factored in to the student's score. The preliminary data show exam scores are highly correlated regardless of the exam's format (online or proctored). These data also show a slight difference in how students fair when taking a proctored exam first and then an online exam. Specifically, students who did poorly on the proctored exam do slightly better on the online exam while students who did well on the proctored do slightly worse on the online exam. Finally, when comparing the exam types, there is a tighter spread in score distribution when online exams are used versus proctored exams. In order to scale this study up, data from other online classes at Madison Area Technical College were collected and analyzed. This session will present the findings and include a discussion of best practices for both proctored and online exams.

Transcript of To Proctor or Not to Proctor: An Evaluation of Exam Formats for the Online Classroom

Page 1: To Proctor or Not to Proctor: An Evaluation of Exam Formats for the Online Classroom

TO P

ROCTOR O

R NOT

TO

PROCTOR:

AN E

VALUATI

ON OF

EXAM

FORM

ATS F

OR THE

ONLINE

CLASS

ROOM

J E N N I F E R L E W I S

S L O A N 2 0 1 3N O V E M B E R 2 0 ,

2 0 1 3

Page 2: To Proctor or Not to Proctor: An Evaluation of Exam Formats for the Online Classroom

BACKGROUND:

PROCTORED?ONLINE?

Page 3: To Proctor or Not to Proctor: An Evaluation of Exam Formats for the Online Classroom

DEFINITIONS

Online

• Online in LMS• Timed• Password

Protected• Unsupervised

Proctored

• Online in LMS or Paper

• Timed• Supervised

Page 4: To Proctor or Not to Proctor: An Evaluation of Exam Formats for the Online Classroom

DATA COLLECTION

1 Proctored1 Online Exam• 88 Students• 5 Classes

2 Online Exams• 102 Students• 5 Classes

2 Proctored Exams• 90 Students• 5 Classes

Page 5: To Proctor or Not to Proctor: An Evaluation of Exam Formats for the Online Classroom

ORIGINAL DATA RESULTS:

Page 6: To Proctor or Not to Proctor: An Evaluation of Exam Formats for the Online Classroom

DATA EXPANSION

1 Proctored1 Online Exam• 88 Students• 5 Classes

2 Online Exams• 165 Students• 9 Classes

2 Proctored Exams• 90 Students• 5 Classes

Page 7: To Proctor or Not to Proctor: An Evaluation of Exam Formats for the Online Classroom

APPLES TO ORANGES: A PROBLEM EMERGES

Page 8: To Proctor or Not to Proctor: An Evaluation of Exam Formats for the Online Classroom

UPDATED RESULTS:

Page 9: To Proctor or Not to Proctor: An Evaluation of Exam Formats for the Online Classroom

EXAM NO-SHOWS

PROCTORED

ONLINE

6 % 10 %

Page 10: To Proctor or Not to Proctor: An Evaluation of Exam Formats for the Online Classroom

DATA TAKE THREE

1 Proctored1 Online Exam• 88 Students• 5 Classes

2 Online Exams• 165 Students• 9 Classes

2 Proctored Exams• 90 Students• 5 Classes

598 more students

Page 11: To Proctor or Not to Proctor: An Evaluation of Exam Formats for the Online Classroom

EXAM-TO-EXAM PERFORMANCE

Page 12: To Proctor or Not to Proctor: An Evaluation of Exam Formats for the Online Classroom

EXAM TYPE COMPARISON

Page 13: To Proctor or Not to Proctor: An Evaluation of Exam Formats for the Online Classroom

CONCLUSIONS

1. Student performance from exam to

exam is highly correlated.

2. More students miss/skip online

exams.

3. There is no major difference in

student performance based on exam

type.

Page 14: To Proctor or Not to Proctor: An Evaluation of Exam Formats for the Online Classroom

BEST TIPS:

1. Decide exam type before the course starts.

2. Advertise early and often.

Page 15: To Proctor or Not to Proctor: An Evaluation of Exam Formats for the Online Classroom

KEYS FOR SUCCESS: ONLINE EXAMS

1. Provide clear instructions.

2. Use large question banks.

3. Randomize exams for each student.

4. Acknowledge “open book” exam.

5. Set time limits and passwords.

6. Make exam available for longer period.

7. Plan for technical failure before the exam.

8. REMINDERS! REMINDERS! REMINDERS!

Video Instructions: http://youtu.be/C92WQcbi4bk Paper Instructions: http://slidesha.re/IggqiA

Page 16: To Proctor or Not to Proctor: An Evaluation of Exam Formats for the Online Classroom

KEYS FOR SUCCESS: PROCTORED EXAMS1. Adopt college-wide process, when

possible.2. Provide clear instructions.3. Request proctor/exam choice early.4. Contact proctors ASAP.5. Provide a range of exam dates/times.6. Plan for technical failure before the

exam.7. REMINDERS! REMINDERS! REMINDERS!

http://slidesha.re/Igi9EF

Page 17: To Proctor or Not to Proctor: An Evaluation of Exam Formats for the Online Classroom

FOR MORE INFORMATION:

Jennifer Lewis, [email protected]

Skype: jennifer.l.nielsen

Twitter: GeoJenLewis

Your Feedback is Appreciated: http://bit.ly/1e3Ja9G