TMM Collision Management AMRE Update · Assmang Black Rock Booyco Atlas Copco, Cat M/M Progress?...
Transcript of TMM Collision Management AMRE Update · Assmang Black Rock Booyco Atlas Copco, Cat M/M Progress?...
Agenda
2
1. Regulatory Requirements2. Minerals Council Project
• 2018 focus• Stakeholder progress• Solution Testing Strategy• Pilots
Mining Houses ASPASA
Labour
OEMsPDS
Suppliers3rd Party Suppliers
DMR
MRAC 7th February 2018 proposed implementation datesMHSC Board to approve
…..where there is a significant risk of such collisions……• All operations should already have completed a risk assessment to determine significant
risk
Trackless mobile equipment must be provided with means:…..to automatically detect the presence of pedestrians / equipment to effectively warn the operator and the pedestrian of such a presence• ‘Proximity Awareness’ - should already be implemented (2015)
…..and in the event where no action is taken to prevent potential collision, further means shall be provided to retard the “trackless mobile machine” to a safe speed where after the brakes of the diesel powered “trackless mobile machine” are automatically applied.• ‘Collision Avoidance’ – MRAC proposed implementation dates that still have to be
confirmed and then submitted to MHSC:1. Electrical/Battery Powered Equipment – no period of grace2. New Diesel Equipment to be Collision Avoidance ready – July 20193. Underground Diesel – end 2020 Reg. 8.10.1.2 (b)
4. Opencast and Open Pits – end 2020 Reg. 8.10.1.2 (b)
5. Surface – end 20203
TMM Related Fatalities2016 - 9
2017 - 122018 – 6 June YTD
“Trending 12”
Way Forward
Way Forward as proposed by MRAC – proposal to be confirmed by MRAC before passing on to MHSC1. New proposed dates for diesel equipment – end 2020
• MRAC to evaluate global Vehicle Interaction regulatory requirements and supplier capacity2. Minerals Council Project with CM&EE Task Team to coordinate the Way Forward3. Operations to communicate their strategy to their workforce4. DMR to align Regional PIs
‘Significant Risk’ to be determined by each site through a risk assessment process.• All TMM both underground and surface• Focusing on Vehicle-Pedestrian & Vehicle-Vehicle interactions• Effectiveness of Traffic Management Plans will reduce significant risk?• Resultant CMS Strategy and Implementation Plans
On any mine where there is ‘significant risk’ CMS must be implemented…1. Collision Awareness – PDS Solution – the next 18 months
• Must be implemented across all ‘significant risk’ TMM – no period of grace• Implement Traffic Management Plans to reduce the risk – MOSH Leading Practice• Implement a Change Management Plan to reduce the number of alarms and non-compliance• Operations to ensure that PDS Awareness Solutions are able to achieve Avoidance
2. Collision Avoidance – Intervention PDS/OEM Solutions• Battery and Electrical Powered – no period of grace• Accelerated solution development
➢ Selected Development / Test sites➢ End 2019 - develop at least 5 competitive, robust, cost effective solutions➢ 2020 - to roll-out with a Change Management Plan
• Operations to budget for implementation4
Presentation headline Arial Bold 12pt
5
Task Team
Members
• Harmony
• Kumba
• Anglo Coal
• Anglo Platinum
• Petra Diamonds
• Lonmin
• AGA
• Impala
• De Beers
• Sasol
• Sibanye
• Gold Fields
• Exxaro
• South 32
• Glencore Alloys
• Glencore Coal
• ASPASA
• Royal Bafokeng
• RBM (RIO)
Chamber of Mines CMS Initiative
Project Objectives
• Give direction to the industry
• Aligned with global and MOSH initiatives
• Coordinate the Way Forward
– To define the Mining House CMS Strategies
– Influence development of PDS solutions
– Motivate OEMs to commit
– Work with the DMR
• Accelerate the development of solutions in South
Africa through the following initiatives:
1. Incident Analysis
2. Risk Guidelines
3. Industry User Requirements
4. Technology Development Process
5. Accelerated Pilots
6. Solution Evaluation
• Communicate the progress to the DMR, PDS
Suppliers, OEMs, Industry Engineers, CEOs, RTF
Meetings and MHSC
5
2019
13-Nov-17 Oct Nov Dec Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec Dec
1. Incident AnalysisUpdate DMR Analysis
2. TMM Risk GuidelineUpdate Risk Guidelines
3. Industry User RequirementsUpdate User Requirements
Develop Interface Protocol
4. Technology Process AssessmentDevelop & Test process
Evaluate PDS Suppliers
Evaluate OEMs
Feedback
5. Project Monitoring
Pilot Site Monitoring
6. PDS Solution EvaluationUniversity of Pretoria Project
Confirm Evaluation Criteria
Commence UG Electric Coal Evaluations
Commence UG Diesel Evaluations
Commence Surface Evaluations
Regulatory Implementtion DatesUnderground Diesel XSurface X
201820172016
MOSH
MOSH
Minerals Council Initiative
Presentation headline Arial Bold 12pt
6
Focus for 20181. Incident Analysis
• Update analysis from DMR Database
2. TMM Risk Guidelines
• Roll-out Guidelines
3. Industry User Requirement Guidelines
• Roll-out Guidelines
4. Stakeholder progress
1. Operations
2. PDS Suppliers
3. OEMs and Third-Party Integrators
5. Project Development and Monitoring
• Focus on and accelerate projects
• At least 5 solutions for the industry
• UG Diesel by end 2019
• Surface – by end 2019
6. PDS Solution Evaluation
• Develop Solution Evaluation process
• Surface and Underground
• With University of Pretoria
• Approved Certification
7. Coordination
• Stakeholder Engagement and Coordination
• Stakeholder communication
• Aligned messaging with defined objectives
• Mining House Presentations
• Industry Workshops (2)
• DMR, MRAC, CM&EE and CEO ZHF updates
6
13-Nov-17 Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec
1. Incident AnalysisUpdate DMR Analysis
2. TMM Risk GuidelineUpdate Risk Guidelines
3. Industry User Requirements
Rollout User Requirements
Rollout Interface Protocol
4. Technology Process AssessmentDevelop & Test process
Evaluate PDS Suppliers
Evaluate OEMs
Feedback
5. Project Monitoring
Pilot Site Monitoring
6. PDS Solution EvaluationConfirm Evaluation Criteria
Commence UG Coal Evaluations
Commence UG Hard Rock Evaluations
Commence Surface Evaluations
7. CoordinationStakeholder Coordination
Technology Development Roadmap to L9
2018 2019 2020
Concept
Lab Scale
S-Machine
M-Machine
Demonstration L7
L7 - Awareness
Avoidance Concept
Lab ScaleL8 and L9
S-Machine L9
Multiple Machine L9
Roll-out – L9
Avoidance
Co
mp
lexi
ty
Demo L9
Step Change“People and Production”Traffic Management Plans
Change Management
Step Change“Technical”
Demonstration L8
Operational Test Site
7
Sect 21 Technical File
Levels of Control
1. Site Requirements
2. Segregation Controls
3. Operating Procedures
4. Authority to Operate
5. Fitness to Operate
6. Operating Compliance
7. Operator Awareness
8. Advisory Controls
9. Intervention ControlsCollision AvoidanceTakes control from the operator
Proximity DetectionAdvises the operator
Proximity AwarenessAlerts the operator
Operational Discipline Controls
• Risk Guidelines• MOSH TMLP
Design Guidelines• Risk Guidelines• MOSH Traffic
Management Leading Practice (TMLP)
Work Area Controls for all equipment that
could reduce ‘significant risk’
and costs
Technology Controls to address ‘significant
risk’
Regulation 8.10.1 and 8.10.2
8
Operational Strategies and Implementation Plans
9
MI
30
-55
+
10
-30
3-1
0
0-3 0 0-3
3-1
0
10
-30
30
-55
+
L1-Head-on V-V 8 8 8 8 9 9 9 8 8
L2-Reverse-on V-V 8 8 9 9 9 8 8 8 8
L3-Backup V-V 8 8 9 9 9 8 8 8 8
L4-Dovetailing V-V 8 8 8 8 9 9 9 8 8
L5-Passing Head-on V-V 7 7 8 8 9 8 8 7 7
L6-Passing Reverse-on V-V 7 7 8 8 9 8 8 7 7
L7-Overtaking V-V 7 7 8 8 8 8 7 7
L8-Blind Approach V-V 8 8 9 9 9 9 8 8
T1-Merge V-V 8 8 8 8 9 9 8 8
T2-Crossover V-V 8 8 8 8 9 9 8 8
T3-Junction V-V 8 8 8 8 9 9 8 8
T4-Intersection V-V 8 8 8 8 9 9 8 8
O1- Obstacle V-O 7 7 7 9 9 9 7 7 7
P1-Person (direct) V-P - - - - 9 - - - -
P3-Person (indirect) V-P - - - - 9 - - - -
V1-Void V-O 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7
V4-Loss of Control LOC 7 7 7 7 9 9 9 7
V6-Congested Area V-V 7 7 8 9 9 9 8 7 7
Speed Ranges
Reverse ForwardOpen Pit / Opencast
SenariosPUE
Stage GateTRL
LevelPDS Date OEM Date Third Party Date Comments
L7 Demonstration 7 Power Supply Suitable Power Supply
L7 Commercial Roll-out 8-9 Minimal InputApproved mounting locations
PDS EMC Compatibility Certification
L8 and 9 Lab Scale Test 4-5 Input onlyOEM to provide vehicle dynamics information
UP / Gerotek Test
L8 and 9 Single Machine Test 6 Operational representative test environment
Technical File Section 21 requirement
L8 Multiple Machine Test 6Demonstrating technical capability in an operational
environment
L8 Demonstration 7 Input onlyDemonstrating capability, reliability, accuracy and
production impact
L9 Demonstration 7Demonstrate conformance to CMS Scope
Target end 2019
L9 Commercial Roll-out 8-9 Full Roll-out end 2020
X
UG Diesel PDS Supplier Solution MaturityCommon Understanding
• Complex Intelligent solutiono Requirements generally underestimatedo Impact on production/maintenanceo Needs direction from operations
• Technology Maturityo Electric Equipment – technology proveno UG Diesel equipment – limited solutionso Surface equipment– more complex solution
10
Target5 Suppliers each
OEM Commitment
Commitment is evident• Need a solution for every model
o Old and newo Solutions are costly
• Third-Party solutions available where OEMs are not committing
• Solution Options for OEMs1. OEM Solution2. Partnering option with Third-Parties3. Third-Party Non-OEM solution – consequences
for all!
11
OEM Action Plans1. Sandvik – got a plan2. AARD – got a plan3. GHH – got a plan4. Fermel – got a plan5. Cat Underground – got a plan6. Rham – Got a plan7. Atlas Copco – reactive plan8. Manitou – plan to be evaluated
9. Komatsu – selective plan10. Hitachi – selective plan11. Volvo – awaiting plan12. Cat Surface – got a plan13. Bell – got a plan14. Liebherr – got a plan
Third-Party Opportunities1. Nerospec2. Sedna3. ECS4. RCT5. HK Diesel
Underground
New Intelligent Models
Older Non-Intelligent Models
Drill Rigs, Roof Bolters, etc.
OEM SolutionOEM/Third-Party
Solution
OEM/Third-Party Solution
Third Party Solution
OEM/Third-Party Solution
Third Party Solution
Surface
Elect Haul Trucks Mech Haul Trucks ADTs, FELs, etc.
OEM SolutionOEM Solution
Third-Party SolutionOEM Solution
Third Party Solution
Solution Testing Strategy
2018 2019 2020
Concept
Lab Scale
S-Machine
M-Machine
Demonstration L7
L7 - Awareness
Avoidance Concept
Lab ScaleL7, 8 & L9
S-Machine L9
Multiple Machine L9
Roll-out – L9
Avoidance
Demo L9
Demonstration L8
Operational Test Site
12
Sect 21 Technical File
UP/GerotekTesting maturity and capability of the PDS
Solution
On SiteCapability of
PDS/OEM/Third Party solution in an operational
environment
Production EnvironmentData driven PDS demonstration to
ensure capability, dependability and impact on production
Dependant on Change Management
Production EnvironmentL9 Switched on
Data driven demonstration to ensure capability, dependability and impact on production of the
total solution
13
Nominated Test SitesMining Type Mining House Mine PDS Supplier Third-Party OEM S/Gate Comments
Anglo Coal Goedehoop Strata Sandvik LHDs only L9 L9 Rolling out
Sasol Midelbult Strata ECS Wright Concept Stalled
Sasol Brandspruit Matrix Sandvik Concept
Exxaro Forzando Strata ECS Sandvik, Wagner Lab Scale Lab Scale Test
Universal NCC Favorsea Favorsea Sandvik, Torro S/MC L9 Solution
Sibanye Kroondal Schauenburg ECS AARD S/MC ???
Sibanye Kroondal Booyco ECS AARD S/MC ???
Sibanye Bathopele Schauenburg Sandvik, AC, Fermal S/MC Restarting
Petra Diamonds Finch Booyco Sandvik S/MC
Petra Diamonds Cullinan Booyco Cat S/MC
Harmony Tshepong A&R Wagner Concept
DeBeers Venetia Booyco Sandvik Concept
Glencore Waterval A&R Nerospec Sandvik, GHH, Rham L9 L9 Rolling out
Assmang Black Rock Booyco Atlas Copco, Cat M/M Progress?
Royal Bafokeng Styldrift Booyco HK Diesel Sandvik, Fermel, Cat S/MC Stalled
Kumba Sishen Safemine Komatsu - 960, 860 L9 L9 Rolling out
Kumba Kolomela Safemine Hexagon/RCT Cat 777 S/MC
Kumba Kolomela Safemine Komatsu - 730, 785 S/MC Proving Grounds S/MC Test
Glencore Impunzi Safemine Cat 777F S/MC Planning S/MC test
Exxaro Grootegeluk Safemine Hitachi Lab Scale
Sedibelo PPM GE RCT? Cat 777E Concept
Anglo Platinum Mogalakwena Modular Komatsu, Cat S/MC Proving Grounds S/MC Test
Harmony Calgold Electro Diesel Bell Concept
Petra Diamonds KevJV Electro Diesel Cat 745 Concept
Glencore Rietvly Electro Diesel Nerospec Bell S/MC Proving Grounds S/MC Test
Canyon Coal Phalandwa Favorsea Favorsea Bell S/MC L9 Solution
Idwala N Cape Booyco Komatsu, Cat Concept
Afrimat Glen Douglas MPI Bell, Westenstarr Concept
Afrisam Eikenhoff TBD Bell, Volvo Concept
Lafarge Nelspruit TBD Cat Concept
Surface Facilities Test sites?
Coal
Underground
Diesel
Hard Rock
Underground
Diesel
-Conventional
- Mechanised
- Block Cave
- SLC
Open Pit
Opencast
Mini Pits
Quarries
14
Provide Direction
• Determine significant risk machines
• Strategy and Plans
• Implement Awareness
• Traffic Management Plans
• Change Management Plans
• Sponsor Development / Test Sites
• Budgeting
Mining houses ASPASA
Accelerated development of a
Complex Solution
PDS suppliers
OEMs
Commit to developing a
Controller for all models
• July 2019 for new
machines
• End 2019 for all models
3rd Party Integrators
Fast-track sustainable
Third-Party solutions
Common Guidelines
Setting the requirements
Support the proposed dates
RegulatorsDMRPIs
In Conclusion