TMK IR PRESENTATION · 7.5 12.8 12.9 52.1 42.9 17.8 17.9 17.6 12.6 7.5 9.2 12.2 74.2 58.1 32.9 36.3...

54
TMK IR PRESENTATION November 2016

Transcript of TMK IR PRESENTATION · 7.5 12.8 12.9 52.1 42.9 17.8 17.9 17.6 12.6 7.5 9.2 12.2 74.2 58.1 32.9 36.3...

Page 1: TMK IR PRESENTATION · 7.5 12.8 12.9 52.1 42.9 17.8 17.9 17.6 12.6 7.5 9.2 12.2 74.2 58.1 32.9 36.3 31.3 23.2 15.0 22.0 25.1 102.0 72.7 55.0 62.5 49.6 43.1 35.3 47.7 47.0 3Q14 4Q14

TMK IR PRESENTATION

November 2016

Page 2: TMK IR PRESENTATION · 7.5 12.8 12.9 52.1 42.9 17.8 17.9 17.6 12.6 7.5 9.2 12.2 74.2 58.1 32.9 36.3 31.3 23.2 15.0 22.0 25.1 102.0 72.7 55.0 62.5 49.6 43.1 35.3 47.7 47.0 3Q14 4Q14

Disclaimer

No representation or warranty (express or implied) is made as to, and no reliance should be placed on,

the fairness, accuracy or completeness of the information contained herein and, accordingly, none of the

Company, or any of its shareholders or subsidiaries or any of such person's officers or employees accepts

any liability whatsoever arising directly or indirectly from the use of this presentation.

This presentation contains certain forward-looking statements that involve known and unknown risks,

uncertainties and other factors which may cause the Company's actual results, performance or

achievements to be materially different from any future results, performance or achievements expressed

or implied by such forward-looking statements. PAO TMK does not undertake any responsibility to

update these forward-looking statements, whether as a result of new information, future events or

otherwise.

This presentation contains statistics and other data on PAO TMK’s industry, including market share

information, that have been derived from both third party sources and from internal sources. Market

statistics and industry data are subject to uncertainty and are not necessarily reflective of market

conditions. Market statistics and industry data that are derived from third party sources have not been

independently verified by PAO TMK. Market statistics and industry data that have been derived in whole

or in part from internal sources have not been verified by third party sources and PAO TMK cannot

guarantee that a third party would obtain or generate the same results.

2

Page 3: TMK IR PRESENTATION · 7.5 12.8 12.9 52.1 42.9 17.8 17.9 17.6 12.6 7.5 9.2 12.2 74.2 58.1 32.9 36.3 31.3 23.2 15.0 22.0 25.1 102.0 72.7 55.0 62.5 49.6 43.1 35.3 47.7 47.0 3Q14 4Q14

TMK– Global Supplier of Full Range of Pipes for Oil and Gas Industry

3

Source: Spears & Associates

2016E global drilling activity by geography(number of wells drilled)

Note: Excluding China and Central Asia. Onshore and offshore drilling

US + Russia & CIS + Middle East + Canada= 81%

US40%

Russia & CIS19%

Canada11%

Middle East11%

South America

7%

Far East6%

Africa4%

Europe2%

Page 4: TMK IR PRESENTATION · 7.5 12.8 12.9 52.1 42.9 17.8 17.9 17.6 12.6 7.5 9.2 12.2 74.2 58.1 32.9 36.3 31.3 23.2 15.0 22.0 25.1 102.0 72.7 55.0 62.5 49.6 43.1 35.3 47.7 47.0 3Q14 4Q14

2,119 2,342 2,494 2,422 2,560 2,410

1,8431,844 1,743 1,866 1,842

1,461

3,9624,185 4,238 4,288 4,402

3,871

2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015Seamless pipe Welded pipe

Leading Global Supplier of Pipe for Oil and Gas Industry

Focus on oil & gas industry

Source: TMK data

2015 Sales by Industry (%)

Source: TMK data

Sales (thousand tonnes)

A world leading tube producer by sales in 2015 and for the last 6 years

Local producer in countries which account for 81% of global drilling activity

High exposure to the oil and gas industry: approximately 78% of sales went to the oil and gas sector in 2015

4

Oil & Gas78%

Other22%

Page 5: TMK IR PRESENTATION · 7.5 12.8 12.9 52.1 42.9 17.8 17.9 17.6 12.6 7.5 9.2 12.2 74.2 58.1 32.9 36.3 31.3 23.2 15.0 22.0 25.1 102.0 72.7 55.0 62.5 49.6 43.1 35.3 47.7 47.0 3Q14 4Q14

High degree of diversification ensuring earnings resilience.

Geographical diversification seeking to mitigate swings in geographical demand.

Diversified product portfolio, including full range of seamless and welded pipes.

Focus on higher value added products, including seamless pipes and OCTG.

Diversified customer base covering end users in oil and gas and industrial sectors.

Long-term relationships with Russian oil and gas majors (Rosneft, Gazprom, Surgutneftgas and Lukoil).

Diversified Business ModelKey Considerations

Diversified geographical reach

Diversified product portfolio and customer base

Source: TMK data

TMK revenues by country (9M 2016)

Source: TMK data

Sales by product (9M 2016)

5

Seamless OCTG 39%

Seamless Line Pipe 15%

Seamless Industrial 14%

Welded Industrial 8%

Welded OCTG 1%

Welded Line Pipe 7%

Welded LD 15%

Russia72%

Americas14%

Europe8%

ME & Gulf Region

2%

C.Asia & Caspian Region

2%Asia & Far

East1%

Page 6: TMK IR PRESENTATION · 7.5 12.8 12.9 52.1 42.9 17.8 17.9 17.6 12.6 7.5 9.2 12.2 74.2 58.1 32.9 36.3 31.3 23.2 15.0 22.0 25.1 102.0 72.7 55.0 62.5 49.6 43.1 35.3 47.7 47.0 3Q14 4Q14

Low Cost Vertically Integrated Producer

Key considerations

Vertical integration in seamless business

Raw materials costs can generally be passed through to customers

Cost of sales structure (9M 2016)

Source: TMK

Structural cost advantages over major international competitors: Russia is one of thelowest cost regions for steel production.

Fully vertically integrated seamless pipe production (upstream and downstreamoperations) in all divisions.

Almost self-sufficient in steel billets.

Ability to generally pass increased cost of steel to customers albeit with some timelag.

In February 2015, TMK acquired a 100% interest in ChermetServis-Snabzhenie for atotal amount of around RUB 2.73 billion. ChS-Snabzhenie had been the main scrapsupplier to TMK steel mills for the last several years and fully covered the Company’sscrap requirements.

Note: Excluding depreciation and amortisationSource: TMK IFRS accounts

6

Raw materials and consumables

65%Staff costs including

social security17%

Energy and utilities9%

Contracted manufacture

3%

Other6%

Page 7: TMK IR PRESENTATION · 7.5 12.8 12.9 52.1 42.9 17.8 17.9 17.6 12.6 7.5 9.2 12.2 74.2 58.1 32.9 36.3 31.3 23.2 15.0 22.0 25.1 102.0 72.7 55.0 62.5 49.6 43.1 35.3 47.7 47.0 3Q14 4Q14

Russian Market Overview

7

Page 8: TMK IR PRESENTATION · 7.5 12.8 12.9 52.1 42.9 17.8 17.9 17.6 12.6 7.5 9.2 12.2 74.2 58.1 32.9 36.3 31.3 23.2 15.0 22.0 25.1 102.0 72.7 55.0 62.5 49.6 43.1 35.3 47.7 47.0 3Q14 4Q14

8

Russian Oil Production Hits Record High…

10.2

10.3

10.4

10.5

10.6

10.7

10.8

10.9

11.0

11.1

11.2

11.3

Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec

2014 2015 2016

Russian total oil output, mmbpd

Source: CDU TEK.

9M2016 Russian oil production growth broken down, mmbpd

Source: Interfax, Info TEK.

10.70 10.88

+7% +7% +8% +5% (0.1%) (0.5%) (4.2%)

9M2015 Others Gazprom Neft Bashneft Tatneft SurgutNG Rosneft LUKoil 9M2016

Russian production set new historic record

breaking 11.2 mmbpd

Page 9: TMK IR PRESENTATION · 7.5 12.8 12.9 52.1 42.9 17.8 17.9 17.6 12.6 7.5 9.2 12.2 74.2 58.1 32.9 36.3 31.3 23.2 15.0 22.0 25.1 102.0 72.7 55.0 62.5 49.6 43.1 35.3 47.7 47.0 3Q14 4Q14

9

… Supported by Strong Drilling Activity

30

35

40

45

50

55

60

65

70

75

2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 9M2016

827

932

+71% +44%+33%

+24% +9% (14%)(38%)

1H2

015

Ta

tnef

t

Ba

shn

eft

Ro

snef

t

Ga

zpro

m

Ga

zpro

mN

eft

Lu

ko

il

No

vate

k

1H2

016

16,716

44%31% 29% 6% 2% (6%) (13%) 19,665

9M

20

15

Ro

snef

t

Oth

er

Ba

shn

eft

Su

rgu

tNG

Ta

tnef

t

Ga

zpro

mN

eft

LU

Ko

il

9M

20

16

Source: CDU TEK.

Russian drilling activity is strong and growing, km/d

Source: Companies’ data.

Upstream CAPEX budgets respond to profit resilience, RUB bn

+13%

9M2016 Russian drilling growth broken down, km

Source: CDU TEK.

Horizontal drilling keeps growing in absolute, km/d

Source: CDU TEK.

+18%

0

5

10

15

20

25

30

2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 9M2016

Page 10: TMK IR PRESENTATION · 7.5 12.8 12.9 52.1 42.9 17.8 17.9 17.6 12.6 7.5 9.2 12.2 74.2 58.1 32.9 36.3 31.3 23.2 15.0 22.0 25.1 102.0 72.7 55.0 62.5 49.6 43.1 35.3 47.7 47.0 3Q14 4Q14

10

22.1 15.2 15.1 18.4 13.6 10.6 7.5 12.8 12.9

52.1

42.9

17.8 17.917.6

12.67.5

9.2 12.2

74.2

58.1

32.9 36.331.3

23.215.0

22.0 25.1

102.0

72.7

55.062.5

49.643.1

35.3

47.7 47.0

3Q14 4Q14 1Q15 2Q15 3Q15 4Q15 1Q16 2Q16 3Q16

MET Export Duty Brent Price

… Underpinned by Flexible Fiscal Regime And Floating Exchange RateHistorical MET and export duty, US$/bbl

The main factor supporting upstream margins is the flexible tax regime which absorbs the significant part of oil price drop

The two major Upstream taxes in Russia –Mineral Extraction Tax (MET) and Export Duty – are directly linked to oil price and provide amortizing effect when crude price goes down

Source: Public Information, companies data.

0.00

0.01

0.02

0.03

0

30

60

90

120

Nov-13 Mar-14 Aug-14 Dec-14 May-15 Sep-15 Feb-16 Jun-16 Nov-16

US

D/R

UB

Bre

nt,

US

$/b

bl

Brent (LHS) USD/RUB (RHS)

Ruble devaluation with oil price drop, US$/bbl

8.9

8.0

5.6

7.1

5.9 6.1

5.1

6.1

4.9

4.0

2.93.5

3.1 3.22.6

3.0

3Q14 4Q14 1Q15 2Q15 3Q15 4Q15 1Q16 2Q16

Capex Opex

Average upstream Opex and Capex of Russian oil companies, US$/boe

Page 11: TMK IR PRESENTATION · 7.5 12.8 12.9 52.1 42.9 17.8 17.9 17.6 12.6 7.5 9.2 12.2 74.2 58.1 32.9 36.3 31.3 23.2 15.0 22.0 25.1 102.0 72.7 55.0 62.5 49.6 43.1 35.3 47.7 47.0 3Q14 4Q14

Robust Upstream Economics in Russia

Strong upstream EBITDA margin despite oil price collapse

11

Despite 50% drop in oil price since 3Q 2014 Russian Upstream sector remains profitable with stable EBITDA margin per bbl and significantly increasing EBITDA margin (to 20-25% range)

Source: Public Information, companies data.Note: EBITDA was calculated based on Rosneft, Lukoil, Gazprom Neft and Bashneft figures weighted by their hydrocarbon production.

102

73

55

62

50

43

35

48

15

7 1013 10 9 8

11

14%

10%

19%21% 21%

20%22%

25%

3Q14 4Q14 1Q15 2Q15 3Q15 4Q15 1Q16 2Q16

Brent price (US$/bbl) EBITDA (US$/boe) Margin

Page 12: TMK IR PRESENTATION · 7.5 12.8 12.9 52.1 42.9 17.8 17.9 17.6 12.6 7.5 9.2 12.2 74.2 58.1 32.9 36.3 31.3 23.2 15.0 22.0 25.1 102.0 72.7 55.0 62.5 49.6 43.1 35.3 47.7 47.0 3Q14 4Q14

12

Broker Consensus Predicts Brent Price Recovery to US$70+/bbl levels in 2018-2019

Brent historical and forecasted prices, US$/bbl

Oil price started to rebound in January 2016 and currently stabilized at US$40-50/bbl range with decline in production in US, China, Colombia and Mexico being compensated growth on production in Russia, Brazil and Kazakhstan

Brokers estimate oil price to recover to US$70+/bbl levels in 2018-2019

Source: Brokers consensus as of November 2016.

111 112109

100

54

45

58

6872

46

70

9085

4450

5258

0

20

40

60

80

100

120

2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016E 2017E 2018E 2019E

Brent price (Historical) Brent price - Median (Brokers Consensus)

Brent price - High (Brokers Consensus) Brent price - Low (Brokers Consensus)

Page 13: TMK IR PRESENTATION · 7.5 12.8 12.9 52.1 42.9 17.8 17.9 17.6 12.6 7.5 9.2 12.2 74.2 58.1 32.9 36.3 31.3 23.2 15.0 22.0 25.1 102.0 72.7 55.0 62.5 49.6 43.1 35.3 47.7 47.0 3Q14 4Q14

13

TMK Operates in Regions with Low-cost Oil Production

4020 60 80

Eu

rop

e

Asia Conv.

Asia DW

GTL

CTL

NA conv.

Aus. and Pacific

EO

R

Arc

tic

Global oil production supply curve

August 2014 Brent price

Ca

na

dia

n

Oil

Sa

nd

s

VZ

ex

tra

hea

vy

NA

DW

Ea

gle

Fo

rd

Permian tight

Bakken

SA

DW

(pri

ma

rily

Bra

zil)

Production (MBD)

Note: Breakeven price assumes a 10% return, and NPV of 0; *includes Azerbaijan, Kazakhstan, Turkmenistan and UzbekistanSource: IEA World Energy Outlook; EIA International Energy Outlook; EIA Annual Energy Outlook; Morgan Stanley; Bain

September 2016 Brent price

Low-cost supply completely in the money at current Brent price

Afr

ica

Off

sho

re

OPEC, Middle East and AfricaRussia,

Caspian region S.

Am

eric

a

(No

n-

OP

EC

) Asiaconv.

Page 14: TMK IR PRESENTATION · 7.5 12.8 12.9 52.1 42.9 17.8 17.9 17.6 12.6 7.5 9.2 12.2 74.2 58.1 32.9 36.3 31.3 23.2 15.0 22.0 25.1 102.0 72.7 55.0 62.5 49.6 43.1 35.3 47.7 47.0 3Q14 4Q14

Russian Tube & Pipe Market

14

TMK32%

TMK26%

Source: TMK estimates

Source: TMK estimates, based on 9M2016 numbers

#1 on the Russian tube & pipe market 37% market share of energy pipe demand (+5% YoY)

Source: TMK estimates, based on 9M 2015-2016 numbers

Non-Energy

Energy

0

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016E 2017F

Mln

to

nn

es

9M 2015 9M 2016

TMK37%

Page 15: TMK IR PRESENTATION · 7.5 12.8 12.9 52.1 42.9 17.8 17.9 17.6 12.6 7.5 9.2 12.2 74.2 58.1 32.9 36.3 31.3 23.2 15.0 22.0 25.1 102.0 72.7 55.0 62.5 49.6 43.1 35.3 47.7 47.0 3Q14 4Q14

Russian Market Share Positions

15

Source: TMK estimates, based on 9M2016 numbers

Premium

Premium connections are proprietary value-added products used to connect OCTG pipes and are used in sour, deep well, off-shore, low temperature and other high-pressure applications.

Premium Connections

(TMK UP)

81%(+9% YoY)

Welded

The short-distance transportation of crude oil, oil products and natural gas.

Line Pipe 20% (-2% YoY)

Construction of trunk pipeline systems for the long distance transportation of natural gas, crude oil and petroleum products.

Large-Diameter

21% (+4% YoY)

Wide array of applications and industries, including utilities and agriculture.

Industrial 8% (-2% YoY)

Seamless

Threaded pipes for the oil and gas industry including drill pipe, casing and tubing.

OCTG 68% (+2% YoY)

The short-distance transportation of crude oil, oil products and natural gas.

Line Pipe 63% (+1% YoY)

Automotive, machine building, and power generation sectors.

Industrial 38% (0% YoY)

Page 16: TMK IR PRESENTATION · 7.5 12.8 12.9 52.1 42.9 17.8 17.9 17.6 12.6 7.5 9.2 12.2 74.2 58.1 32.9 36.3 31.3 23.2 15.0 22.0 25.1 102.0 72.7 55.0 62.5 49.6 43.1 35.3 47.7 47.0 3Q14 4Q14

Strengthening Position on the Domestic Market

16

61% 65% 68%

23% 9%10%

17%27% 23%

0%

25%

50%

75%

100%

2014 2015 9M2016TMK Import Other local producers

8.4 9.3 11

.6

13.3

14.3

14.4

16.5 18

.7

20

.5

22

.2

20

.8

22

.0 25

.3

0

1,000

2,000

3,000

4,000

5,000

6,000

7,000

0

5

10

15

20

25

30

20

04

20

05

20

06

20

07

20

08

20

09

20

10

20

11

20

12

20

13

20

14

20

15

20

16E

Un

its

Mln

met

ers

Annual development drilling volume

Total new wells drilled (rhs)

Source: TMK estimates

TMK share of seamless OCTG is growing

Seamless OCTG market shares, %

Growing oil drilling market in Russia

Development of conventional andunconventional reserves will require the useof non-conventional drilling techniques andreliable OCTG products

Russian seamless OCTG market is up by 3%YoY in 9M2016

TMK is a leader in production of seamlessOCTG on the Russian market with around68% market share in 9M 2016

Source: CDU TEK

Page 17: TMK IR PRESENTATION · 7.5 12.8 12.9 52.1 42.9 17.8 17.9 17.6 12.6 7.5 9.2 12.2 74.2 58.1 32.9 36.3 31.3 23.2 15.0 22.0 25.1 102.0 72.7 55.0 62.5 49.6 43.1 35.3 47.7 47.0 3Q14 4Q14

TMK UP Connections for all Conditions

17

Development of fields with hard-to-recover reserves

Directional drilling

Drilling with liner in tough conditions

Drilling with casing in tough conditions

Extreme torsional resistance for high operational torque

Ability to

withstand high tension, compression and bending loads

Easy and reliable make-up

Higher resistance to torque for casing while drilling and rotating

Lite Series Classic Series

Pro Series Torq Series

TMK’s share on the premium market

Source: TMK estimates

Key premium supplier for the Russian independent and state owned oil & gas companies

Leader in the production of premium tubular products on the Russian market with around 81% market share in 9M 2016

In 2016, we expect TMK premium shipments to grow by 8%

65%73%

81%

35%27%

19%

0%

20%

40%

60%

80%

100%

2014 2015 9M2016

%

TMK Others

Current market challenges

Page 18: TMK IR PRESENTATION · 7.5 12.8 12.9 52.1 42.9 17.8 17.9 17.6 12.6 7.5 9.2 12.2 74.2 58.1 32.9 36.3 31.3 23.2 15.0 22.0 25.1 102.0 72.7 55.0 62.5 49.6 43.1 35.3 47.7 47.0 3Q14 4Q14

LDP Demand in Russia

18

55%44%

54%

65%

66%

60% 61% 60%

14%26%

26%

20%

13%

16%18%

17%

31% 30%

20%

15%

21%

24% 22%23%

0

400

800

1,200

1,600

2,000

2,400

2,800

3,200

2012 2013 2014 2015 2016E 2017E 2018E 2019E

Th

ou

san

d t

on

nes

Gazprom Transneft Others

Normal market

Source: TMK estimates

Annual LDP demand for the next three years could amount to approximately 1.9 million tonnes

Major projects planned: Power of Siberia (GAZP), Power of Siberia-2 (GAZP), Nord Stream-2,maintenance needs of Transneft and Gazprom

Booming market

LDP demand in Russia, 2012-2019E

Page 19: TMK IR PRESENTATION · 7.5 12.8 12.9 52.1 42.9 17.8 17.9 17.6 12.6 7.5 9.2 12.2 74.2 58.1 32.9 36.3 31.3 23.2 15.0 22.0 25.1 102.0 72.7 55.0 62.5 49.6 43.1 35.3 47.7 47.0 3Q14 4Q14

First shipments of premium pipes with lubricant-free

coating to LUKoil-Niznevolzhskneft offshore field

Shipments of premium products with hydrogen sulfide

resistant coating to LUKoil-Kandym field

Research and Development cooperation agreement for

2014-2016 as part of TMK’s broader import substitution

program

Partnership on import substitution program

Considering use of TMK’s premium products in

Rosneft’s Russian continental shelf projects

The list of products in demand includes high-strength

pipe casing and oil well tubing, large diameter pipe

casing and new types of premium threaded connections

19

TMK long-term agreement to supply premium products to Gazprom

Source: TMK data

Long-term agreement to 2023

Guaranteed purchase of Premium tubular products

Packaged solution (development of innovative products,

production, logistical and technical support)

Products will be designed and supplied in accordance

with Gazprom’s specific technical requirements

Import substitution program

Gazprom is prepared to pay in advance for the new

products which are under development

Memorandum with Rosneft regarding offshore projects Shipments to LUKoil

For current and newly developed

projects, including:

Astrakhan field

Urengoy field

Chayandinskoye field

Kovyktinskoye field

Power of Siberia

Offshore projects

Long-term Relationships with Top-Tier Oil and Gas Companies

Page 20: TMK IR PRESENTATION · 7.5 12.8 12.9 52.1 42.9 17.8 17.9 17.6 12.6 7.5 9.2 12.2 74.2 58.1 32.9 36.3 31.3 23.2 15.0 22.0 25.1 102.0 72.7 55.0 62.5 49.6 43.1 35.3 47.7 47.0 3Q14 4Q14

US Market Overview

20

Page 21: TMK IR PRESENTATION · 7.5 12.8 12.9 52.1 42.9 17.8 17.9 17.6 12.6 7.5 9.2 12.2 74.2 58.1 32.9 36.3 31.3 23.2 15.0 22.0 25.1 102.0 72.7 55.0 62.5 49.6 43.1 35.3 47.7 47.0 3Q14 4Q14

2016 Industry Performance Review: a Challenging Year

21

0

20

40

60

80

100

120

0 3 6 9 12 15 18 21 24

US

Rig

Co

un

t In

dex

Ba

se 1

00

= L

ast

pee

k b

efo

re d

ecli

ne

Months after last peak

1986-1988 2008-2010 2014-2016

Rig count reached bottom in May at 404 units, but grew by more than 160 rigs since then

Average number of rigs in 3Q2016 increased by 14% QoQ, following the recovery in oil prices

Low-breakeven Permian basin has concentrated most of the rigs added since the trough

U.S. domestic crude production continues declining and averaged 8.5 mb/d in September, down 1.1 mb/d from the peak reached in April 2015

Henry Hub Natural Gas prices experienced a strong rally during the summer 2016 rising from a 17-year low of $1.64/MMBtu in early March to a high of $3.07 in mid-September with the current level of $2.37/MMBtu

This downturn has been longer and tougher…

…but the rig count has started recovering

Source: Baker Hughes

Source: Baker Hughes, Bloomberg

0

20

40

60

80

100

120

-

400

800

1,200

1,600

2,000

2,400

Oct-09 Jul-11 Apr-13 Jan-15 Oct-16

Cru

de

Oil

Pri

ce (

$/B

bl)

US

rig

co

un

t

Oil Gas Crude Oil WTI Spot

Page 22: TMK IR PRESENTATION · 7.5 12.8 12.9 52.1 42.9 17.8 17.9 17.6 12.6 7.5 9.2 12.2 74.2 58.1 32.9 36.3 31.3 23.2 15.0 22.0 25.1 102.0 72.7 55.0 62.5 49.6 43.1 35.3 47.7 47.0 3Q14 4Q14

TMK Operates in Regions with Low-cost Oil Production

22

0

100

200

300

400

500

600

Jan-13 Jul-13 Jan-14 Jul-14 Jan-15 Jul-15 Jan-16 Jul-16

Mo

nth

ly U

S O

CT

G c

on

sum

pti

on

, kt

OCTG consumption dropped sharply but has already reached bottom and started recovering

Inventory levels showed a steep decline but the market is still oversupplied

US consumption of OCTG is expected to decline to 2.2 million tonnes in 2016, 43% lower than in 2015

US OCTG inventories not yet back to normalized level but down from 11.6 months to 9 months in 3Q

Following the rig count evolution, a gradual recovery of the North American pipe market started in 2Q 2016 and is expected to continue, subject to oil and gas price stabilization and growth

Source: Preston Pipe & Tube ReportSource: Preston Pipe & Tube Report

0

3

6

9

12

15

1.0

1.4

1.8

2.2

2.6

3.0

3.4

Jan-10 Dec-10 Nov-11 Nov-12 Oct-13 Sep-14 Aug-15 Aug-16

Mo

nth

s o

f in

ven

tory

Ab

solu

te in

ven

tory

, mln

to

nn

es

Monthly absolute inventory Months of inventory

Page 23: TMK IR PRESENTATION · 7.5 12.8 12.9 52.1 42.9 17.8 17.9 17.6 12.6 7.5 9.2 12.2 74.2 58.1 32.9 36.3 31.3 23.2 15.0 22.0 25.1 102.0 72.7 55.0 62.5 49.6 43.1 35.3 47.7 47.0 3Q14 4Q14

OCTG Prices also Reached Bottom during 2Q and Stabilized

23

US distributor welded OCTG vs. HRC prices(monthly average)

Source: Pipe Logix, HRC Midwest CRU Prices

US distributor seamless OCTG vs. scrap prices(monthly average)

Source: Pipel Logix, AMM

According to Pipe Logix, OCTG seamless and welded prices have been stable since they reached bottom in April 2016

In 3Q 2016, HRC prices weakened and reached $557 per tonne by the end of September (19% lower than at the end of June 2016). Scrap prices followed a similar trend and decreased 11% during the quarter ending on average at $271 per tonne

0

400

800

1,200

1,600

2,000

0

400

800

1,200

1,600

2,000

Jul-12 Mar-13 Dec-13 Aug-14 Apr-15 Jan-16 Sep-16

HR

C $

/ t

on

ne

Wel

ded

OC

TG

$ /

to

nn

e

Welded OCTG price, US$/tonne HRC price, US$/tonne

0

480

960

1,440

1,920

2,400

0

480

960

1,440

1,920

2,400

Jul-12 Mar-13 Dec-13 Aug-14 Apr-15 Dec-15 Sep-16

Scr

ap

$ /

to

nn

e

Sea

mle

ss O

CT

G $

/ t

on

ne

Seamless OCTG price, US$/tonne Scrap price, US$/tonne

Page 24: TMK IR PRESENTATION · 7.5 12.8 12.9 52.1 42.9 17.8 17.9 17.6 12.6 7.5 9.2 12.2 74.2 58.1 32.9 36.3 31.3 23.2 15.0 22.0 25.1 102.0 72.7 55.0 62.5 49.6 43.1 35.3 47.7 47.0 3Q14 4Q14

US Natural Gas Consumption and Price Outlook

24

US natural gas consumption by sector, 2014 –2040E (quadrillion Btu)

Consensus points to higher Henry Hub natural gas prices in 2017

Industrial and electric power sectors are driving demand for natural gas

In early 2000, electricity was generated by 16% by natural gas and by 52% - coal, while in 2016 it is expected that electricity will be generated by already 28% by natural gas and 37% - coal

Henry Hub Natural Gas prices expected to gradually rise in 2017 with falling supply and rising export demand

Major players in the Marcellus are expecting an average of $3.25/MMBtu in 2017 and $4.50/MMBtu in 2018, which would lead to higher drilling activity and stronger OCTG demand

2.0

2.5

3.0

3.5

1Q-1

5

2Q

-15

3Q

-15

4Q

-15

1Q-1

6

2Q

-16

3Q

-16

4Q

-16

1Q-1

7

2Q

-17

3Q

-17

4Q

-17

2015 2016 2017

US

na

tura

l ga

s ($

/MM

Btu

)

Source: EIA

0

2

4

6

8

10

12

14

2010 2015 2020 2025 2030 2035 2040

qu

ad

rill

ion

Btu

Industrial

Electric Power

Residential

Commercial

Transportation

Source: EIA

Page 25: TMK IR PRESENTATION · 7.5 12.8 12.9 52.1 42.9 17.8 17.9 17.6 12.6 7.5 9.2 12.2 74.2 58.1 32.9 36.3 31.3 23.2 15.0 22.0 25.1 102.0 72.7 55.0 62.5 49.6 43.1 35.3 47.7 47.0 3Q14 4Q14

US Exploration & Production CAPEX Recovery in 2017

25

North American E&P CAPEX

Rig Count outlook

Driven by higher crude oil and gas prices, NAM E&P CAPEX expected to grow in 2017 and beyond

Consensus forecast indicates that rig count will average in the mid-600s during 2017

Rig count recovery forecast to be moderate until mid-2017 as a consequence of price volatility and an abnormally high level of drilled but uncompleted (DUC) wells inventory

Starting in 2H 2017, rig additions should accelerate, driven by higher crude oil and natural gas prices

Low break-even Permian and Marcellus in a better position to benefit from higher E&P spending

Source: Baker Hughes

Source: Citi Research and Corporate reports

0

50

100

150

200

250

3002

00

0

20

02

20

04

20

06

20

08

20

10

20

12

20

14

20

16E

20

18E

20

20

E

N.A

mer

ica

n E

&P

CA

PE

X (

US

$b

n)

0

500

1,000

1,500

2,000

2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016E 2017E 2018E

US

Rig

co

un

t

Page 26: TMK IR PRESENTATION · 7.5 12.8 12.9 52.1 42.9 17.8 17.9 17.6 12.6 7.5 9.2 12.2 74.2 58.1 32.9 36.3 31.3 23.2 15.0 22.0 25.1 102.0 72.7 55.0 62.5 49.6 43.1 35.3 47.7 47.0 3Q14 4Q14

Shale Assets on Cost-curve

26

0

10

20

30

40

50

60

70

80

90

100

0 2 4 6 8 10 12 14 16

Bre

ake

ve

n,

(Bre

nt

US

$/b

oe)

2022E Production, mmboedSource: Company Reports, Citi Research Estimates

Despite a wide variation between plays, US shale producers require the oil price to remain at US$50/bbllong-term for sustainable growth

At the same time, some shale plays like Eagle Ford and Permian are profitable at below or around US$40/bbl

Miss Lime

Vaca Muerta

Page 27: TMK IR PRESENTATION · 7.5 12.8 12.9 52.1 42.9 17.8 17.9 17.6 12.6 7.5 9.2 12.2 74.2 58.1 32.9 36.3 31.3 23.2 15.0 22.0 25.1 102.0 72.7 55.0 62.5 49.6 43.1 35.3 47.7 47.0 3Q14 4Q14

Integrated Well Solutions: TMK IPSCO and TMK Completions

27

Provide customers with creative solutions by leveraging the strengths of TMK IPSCO and TMK Completions

Develop proposals to meet the unique requirements of each customer by linking products and services with innovative technology to ensure customer satisfaction

Bundling pipe, Premium Connections and Completions

TMK OCTG Tubulars: Casing and tubing API and Proprietary Sizes 2-3/8” to 16” Seamless and welded

TMK UP ULTRA™:Some of the strongest and most efficient premium connections available on the market

TMK Completions:Innovative multi-stage fracturing systems and tools for cemented and uncemented designs

Page 28: TMK IR PRESENTATION · 7.5 12.8 12.9 52.1 42.9 17.8 17.9 17.6 12.6 7.5 9.2 12.2 74.2 58.1 32.9 36.3 31.3 23.2 15.0 22.0 25.1 102.0 72.7 55.0 62.5 49.6 43.1 35.3 47.7 47.0 3Q14 4Q14

Results of New Go-to-Market Model in 2016

28

New customers

28%

Established customers

72%

OCTG Sales in 2016E (tonnes)

Source: Company results

Shipments growing since February in the context of weakening market, with other competitors seeing lower volumes in general

Successful implementation of new go-to-market model in most U.S. regions driving recovery in sales and growth in market share: new customers account for 28% of overall OCTG volumes in 2016

Source: Company results

New go-to-market model is driving growth… …increasing customer base and market share

0

5

10

15

20

25

30

Jan-16 Feb-16 Mar-16 Apr-16 May-16 Jun-16 Jul-16 Aug-16

Am

eric

an

Div

isio

n s

ale

s, '0

00

to

nn

es

Page 29: TMK IR PRESENTATION · 7.5 12.8 12.9 52.1 42.9 17.8 17.9 17.6 12.6 7.5 9.2 12.2 74.2 58.1 32.9 36.3 31.3 23.2 15.0 22.0 25.1 102.0 72.7 55.0 62.5 49.6 43.1 35.3 47.7 47.0 3Q14 4Q14

Cost Reduction in Operations

29

Majority of welded mills are temporarily idled, awaiting repositioning/upturn

Downward trend of conversion cost per ton produced, - 34% during 2016

Contributing factors: matching labor, aggressive performance targets, lean manufacturing techniques, campus mentality (production consolidation) and “make to order” approach

─ Matching labor to the utilization of operating facilities, this allows us to control labor cost in

both low and recovering scenarios – total employment costs reduced by 46%

─ Variable cost is improving: -26% in 2016. Fixed cost downward trend: -16% in 2016

─ Process Engineering function installed at each operating facility to ensure implementation of Lean Manufacturing. Lean manufacturing techniques support variable cost and capacity improvements

─ Campus mentality: consolidation of the South Production Campus. Moving Houston Ultra lines to Baytown

Page 30: TMK IR PRESENTATION · 7.5 12.8 12.9 52.1 42.9 17.8 17.9 17.6 12.6 7.5 9.2 12.2 74.2 58.1 32.9 36.3 31.3 23.2 15.0 22.0 25.1 102.0 72.7 55.0 62.5 49.6 43.1 35.3 47.7 47.0 3Q14 4Q14

9M 2016 Summary Financial Results

30

Page 31: TMK IR PRESENTATION · 7.5 12.8 12.9 52.1 42.9 17.8 17.9 17.6 12.6 7.5 9.2 12.2 74.2 58.1 32.9 36.3 31.3 23.2 15.0 22.0 25.1 102.0 72.7 55.0 62.5 49.6 43.1 35.3 47.7 47.0 3Q14 4Q14

9M 2016 Summary Financial Highlights

31

Sales decreased YoY, due to significantly lower volumes in Russian and reduced sales at the American division

Adjusted EBITDA decreased YoY, mostly due to the impact of weak results at the American division, and a negative effect of currency translation

Revenue fell YoY, mostly due to weaker sales at the American division and a negative effect of currency translation

Net profit increased YoY, as there was a foreign exchange gain of $101 mln in 9M 2016 compared to a foreign exchange loss of $87 mln in 9M 2015

Source: TMK data

-13 % YoY -24% YoY

-21% YoY

2,9442,574

0

600

1,200

1,800

2,400

3,000

9m2015 9m2016

Th

ou

san

d t

on

nes

3,213

2,436

0

700

1,400

2,100

2,800

3,500

9m2015 9m2016

US

$ m

ln493

390

15% 16%

0%

3%

6%

9%

12%

15%

18%

0

100

200

300

400

500

9m2015 9m2016

EB

ITD

A m

arg

in, %

US

$ m

ln

3

81

0

20

40

60

80

9m2015 9m2016

US

$ m

ln

Page 32: TMK IR PRESENTATION · 7.5 12.8 12.9 52.1 42.9 17.8 17.9 17.6 12.6 7.5 9.2 12.2 74.2 58.1 32.9 36.3 31.3 23.2 15.0 22.0 25.1 102.0 72.7 55.0 62.5 49.6 43.1 35.3 47.7 47.0 3Q14 4Q14

9M 2016 Sales by Division and Product Group

32

1,806

1,139

1,774

799

0

400

800

1,200

1,600

2,000

Seamless Welded

Th

ou

san

d t

on

nes

9m2015 9m2016

2,440

365 139

2,254

189130

0

500

1,000

1,500

2,000

2,500

Russia America Europe

Th

ou

san

d t

on

nes

9m2015 9m2016

Source: TMK data

Sales by division

Sales by product group

Russian division sales decreased YoY, mainly affected by lower LD pipe volumes compared to record high demand in 9M 2015 and a sharp decline in welded OCTG sales at the American division.

A dramatic YoY decrease in rig count combined with E&P spending cuts in the North American market led to a significant decline in pipe sales at the American division.

European division sales decreased due to lower seamless pipe volumes, resulting from a decline in pipe consumption in the European market.

Seamless pipe volumes decreased YoY, as a result of lower seamless pipe sales at the American division.

Welded pipe sales decreased YoY, largely due to a sharp decline in welded OCTG volumes at the American division combined with lower LD pipe sales at the Russian division.

Total OCTG sales decreased by 5% YoY, largely as a result of a sharp decline at the American division.

-2%

-8%

-6%

-30%

-48%

Page 33: TMK IR PRESENTATION · 7.5 12.8 12.9 52.1 42.9 17.8 17.9 17.6 12.6 7.5 9.2 12.2 74.2 58.1 32.9 36.3 31.3 23.2 15.0 22.0 25.1 102.0 72.7 55.0 62.5 49.6 43.1 35.3 47.7 47.0 3Q14 4Q14

9M 2016 Revenue by Division

33

995

1,723

1,124913

1,297

961

0

300

600

900

1,200

1,500

1,800

Russia America Europe

US

$/t

on

ne

9m2015 9m2016

2,428

629

156

2,057

246 134

0

500

1,000

1,500

2,000

2,500

Russia America Europe

US

$ m

ln

9m2015 9m2016

Revenue Revenue per tonne*

Source: Consolidated IFRS financial statements, TMK data

Revenue for the Russian division decreased YoY, due to a negative effect of currency translation.

Revenue for the American division dropped YoY, as a result of a significant decrease in pipe volumes coupled with weaker pricing.

Revenue for the European division fell YoY, due to lower seamless pipe sales and weaker pricing.

Russian division revenue per tonne decreased YoY, primarily due a negative effect of currency translation.

American division revenue per tonne fell due to lower prices.

European division revenue per tonne decreased YoY, as a result of an unfavorable pricing environment in the European market.

* Revenue/tonne for the Russian and American divisions is calculated as total revenue divided by pipe sales. Revenue for the European Division is calculated as total revenue divided by pipe+billet sales

Note:Certain monetary amounts, percentages and other figures included in this presentation are subject to rounding adjustments. Totals therefore do not always add up to exact arithmetic sums.

-15%

-61%

-15%

-8%

-25%

-14%

Page 34: TMK IR PRESENTATION · 7.5 12.8 12.9 52.1 42.9 17.8 17.9 17.6 12.6 7.5 9.2 12.2 74.2 58.1 32.9 36.3 31.3 23.2 15.0 22.0 25.1 102.0 72.7 55.0 62.5 49.6 43.1 35.3 47.7 47.0 3Q14 4Q14

9M 2016 Adjusted EBITDA by Division

34

19%

0.3%

15%

21%

14%

-4%

-1%

2%

5%

8%

11%

14%

17%

20%

23%

Russia America Europe

%

9m2015 9m2016

Adjusted EBITDA Adjusted EBITDA margin

Source: TMK Consolidated IFRS financial statements, TMK data

Note:Certain monetary amounts, percentages and other figures included in this presentation are subject to rounding adjustments. Totals therefore do not always add up to exact arithmetic sums.

Russian division Adjusted EBITDA decreased YoY, due to a negative effect of currency translation.

American division Adjusted EBITDA dropped YoY, following a sharp decline in sales and pricing.

European division Adjusted EBITDA fell YoY, partially due to a decline in seamless pipe prices.

Russian division Adjusted EBITDA margin increased YoY, as a result of higher prices and cost saving measures.

European division Adjusted EBITDA margin decreased YoY, mostly due to lower pricing of seamless pipe.

-21%

-26%

-7%

468

2 23

434

-63

18

-100

0

100

200

300

400

500

Russia America Europe

US

$ m

ln

9m2015 9m2016

Page 35: TMK IR PRESENTATION · 7.5 12.8 12.9 52.1 42.9 17.8 17.9 17.6 12.6 7.5 9.2 12.2 74.2 58.1 32.9 36.3 31.3 23.2 15.0 22.0 25.1 102.0 72.7 55.0 62.5 49.6 43.1 35.3 47.7 47.0 3Q14 4Q14

Strategic Overview

35

Page 36: TMK IR PRESENTATION · 7.5 12.8 12.9 52.1 42.9 17.8 17.9 17.6 12.6 7.5 9.2 12.2 74.2 58.1 32.9 36.3 31.3 23.2 15.0 22.0 25.1 102.0 72.7 55.0 62.5 49.6 43.1 35.3 47.7 47.0 3Q14 4Q14

Strict Control over CAPEX

36

Limited CAPEX for 2016E-2018E

Upper limit of US$200 mlnannual CAPEX (growth & maintenance) for 2016E-2018E reconfirmed

Strategic investment program completed in Autumn 2014

Strict control over maintenance costs

No M&A’s planned

Source: TMK estimates

208

170190 190

2015 2016E 2017E 2018E

Page 37: TMK IR PRESENTATION · 7.5 12.8 12.9 52.1 42.9 17.8 17.9 17.6 12.6 7.5 9.2 12.2 74.2 58.1 32.9 36.3 31.3 23.2 15.0 22.0 25.1 102.0 72.7 55.0 62.5 49.6 43.1 35.3 47.7 47.0 3Q14 4Q14

Ongoing Cost Cutting Program

37

EBITDA effect c. US$121 mln2014

EBITDA effect c. US$115 mln2015

EBITDA effect c. US$140 mln2016E

Cost cutting program breakdown

Source: TMK estimates

Salaries13%

Maintenance12%

Production yields22%Spare

parts11%Volumes

6%

Logistics6%

Energy7%

Other23%

Salaries25%

Maintenance23%

Production yields14%

Spare parts13%

Volumes 5%

Logistics4%

Energy3% Other

13%Salaries18%

Maintenance26%

Production yields20%

Spare parts15%

Volumes 2%

Logistics8%

Energy6%

Other5%

Page 38: TMK IR PRESENTATION · 7.5 12.8 12.9 52.1 42.9 17.8 17.9 17.6 12.6 7.5 9.2 12.2 74.2 58.1 32.9 36.3 31.3 23.2 15.0 22.0 25.1 102.0 72.7 55.0 62.5 49.6 43.1 35.3 47.7 47.0 3Q14 4Q14

Pro-forma Example of TMK Deleveraging

38

0.0x

1.2x

2.4x

3.6x

4.8x

1,500

2,000

2,500

US

$ m

ln

Net Debt Debt reduction Net Debt/EBITDASource: TMK estimates

Deleveraging schedule* EBITDA growth in 2017E-

2019E

Target to get to below

3.0x Net Debt/EBITDA

in 3 years – focus on cash

generation:

Limited capex and

improved working

capital

Disposal of non-key

assets

Potential SPO

2.5x Net Debt/EBITDA

remains a longer-term

target

Key assumption –

reasonably stable macros,

including gradual US

recovery

Op

era

tin

g C

F 2

017

E

CA

PE

X

Inte

rest

pa

id

Div

iden

ts

De

bt

re

du

cti

on

Op

era

tin

g C

F 2

018

E

CA

PE

X

Inte

rest

pa

id

Div

iden

ts

De

bt

re

du

cti

on

Op

era

tin

g C

F 2

019

E

CA

PE

X

Inte

rest

pa

id

Div

iden

ts

De

bt

re

du

cti

on

0

150

300

450

600

750

US

$ m

ln

2017 2018 2019

2018E 2019E2017E2016E

Below 3.0x

* DOES NOT REPRESENT A GUIDANCE

Page 39: TMK IR PRESENTATION · 7.5 12.8 12.9 52.1 42.9 17.8 17.9 17.6 12.6 7.5 9.2 12.2 74.2 58.1 32.9 36.3 31.3 23.2 15.0 22.0 25.1 102.0 72.7 55.0 62.5 49.6 43.1 35.3 47.7 47.0 3Q14 4Q14

Comfortable Maturity Profile with Ongoing Refinancing

39

3412 3 3 3

235

84

4 4

154

59 65

500

400

50

13 3571

23

23

23 23

165

165

23

79

269

237 237

13

24 11

1

14

333

50

50

76

40

235

106

26 26

319

224

88

79

500

400

269

400

0

100

200

300

400

500

600

4Q2016

1Q 2Q 3Q 4Q 1Q 2Q 3Q 4Q 1Q 2Q 3Q 4Q 2020 2021 2025

US

$ m

ln

USD RUB RUB to be refinanced EUR USD refinanced in 3Q16

USD55%

RUB43%

EUR2%

Source: TMK management accounts (figures based on non-IFRS measures), TMK estimates

Debt maturity profile as at September 30, 2016 As at September 30, 2016,

net debt amounted to US$2,564* mln

Weighted average nominal interest rate decreased by 9 bps compared to June 30, 2016 to 9.00% as at Sep 30, 2016

Credit Ratings:

− S&P: B+, Negative;− Moody’s: B1, Negative

Debt currency structure

Source: TMK management accounts

US$ 237 mln of RUB loans refinanced in the first half of November 2016

2017 2018 2019

US$ 400 mln loans has already been refinanced in September 2016

*TMK estimate

Page 40: TMK IR PRESENTATION · 7.5 12.8 12.9 52.1 42.9 17.8 17.9 17.6 12.6 7.5 9.2 12.2 74.2 58.1 32.9 36.3 31.3 23.2 15.0 22.0 25.1 102.0 72.7 55.0 62.5 49.6 43.1 35.3 47.7 47.0 3Q14 4Q14

Goals

40

DELEVERAGING Target to get to below 3.0x Net Debt/EBITDA in 3 years

2.5x remains a longer-term goal

FOCUS ON CASH GENERATION

Continue optimizing working capital

Ongoing cost cutting

Limited CAPEX

No M&A activity planned

Disposal of non-key assets and potential SPO

MAINTAIN LEADERSHIP

Continue dominating Russian market

Remain among top 3 US OCTG producers

Increase HI-TECH product sales to 70% of Russian division’s revenue by 2020 and maintain our share of total premium connections market in Russia

US$100 mln revenue from newly developed products annually

Page 41: TMK IR PRESENTATION · 7.5 12.8 12.9 52.1 42.9 17.8 17.9 17.6 12.6 7.5 9.2 12.2 74.2 58.1 32.9 36.3 31.3 23.2 15.0 22.0 25.1 102.0 72.7 55.0 62.5 49.6 43.1 35.3 47.7 47.0 3Q14 4Q14

Appendix – Summary Financial Accounts

41

Page 42: TMK IR PRESENTATION · 7.5 12.8 12.9 52.1 42.9 17.8 17.9 17.6 12.6 7.5 9.2 12.2 74.2 58.1 32.9 36.3 31.3 23.2 15.0 22.0 25.1 102.0 72.7 55.0 62.5 49.6 43.1 35.3 47.7 47.0 3Q14 4Q14

Key Consolidated Financial Highlights

(a) IFRS financials figures were rounded for the presentation’s purposes. Minor differences with FS may arise due to rounding(b) Adjusted EBITDA is calculated as profit before tax plus finance costs minus finance income plus depreciation and amortisation adjusted for non-operating and non-recurrent items(c) Sales include other operations and is calculated as Revenue divided by sales volumes tonnes(d) Cash Cost per Tonne is calculated as Cost of Sales less Depreciation & Amortisation divided by sales volumes (e) Purchase of PP&E investing cash flows(f) Total debt represents interest bearing loans and borrowings plus liability under finance lease; Net debt represents Total debt less cash and cash equivalents and short-term financial

investmentsSource: TMK Consolidated IFRS Financial Statements

(US$mln)(a) 2015 2014 2013

Revenue 4,127 6,009 6,432

Adjusted EBITDA(b) 636 804 952

Adjusted EBITDA Margin (%) 15% 13% 15%

Profit (Loss) (368) (217) 215

Net Profit Margin (%) n/a n/a 3%

Pipe Sales ('000 tonnes) 3,871 4,402 4,287

Average Net Sales/tonne (US$)(c) 1,066 1,365 1,500

Cash Cost per tonne (US$)(d) 783 1,030 1,108

Cash Flow from Operating Activities 684 595 703

Capital Expenditure(e)208 293 397

Total Debt(f)2801 3,223 3,694

Net Debt(f)2.496 2,969 3,600

Short-term Debt/Total Debt 21% 24% 11%

Net Debt/Adjusted EBITDA 3.9x 3.7x 3.8x

Adjusted EBITDA/Finance Costs 2.3x3.5x 3.8x

42

Page 43: TMK IR PRESENTATION · 7.5 12.8 12.9 52.1 42.9 17.8 17.9 17.6 12.6 7.5 9.2 12.2 74.2 58.1 32.9 36.3 31.3 23.2 15.0 22.0 25.1 102.0 72.7 55.0 62.5 49.6 43.1 35.3 47.7 47.0 3Q14 4Q14

US$ mln 2015 2014 2013 2012 2011

Revenue 4,127 6,009 6,432 6,688 6,754

Cost of Sales (3,282) (4,839) (5,074) (5,209) (5,307)

Gross Profit 845 1,169 1,358 1,479 1,446

Selling and Distribution Expenses (260) (350) (379) (433) (411)

General and Administrative Expenses (207) (278) (317) (293) (283)

Advertising and Promotion Expenses (8) (14) (12) (11) (9)

Research and Development Expenses (13) (15) (13) (17) (19)

Other Operating Expenses, Net (35) (35) (34) (57) (40)

Foreign Exchange Gain / (Loss), Net (141) (301) (49) 23 (1)

Finance Costs, Net (269) (226) (245) (275) (271)

Other (354) (150) 5 (16) 132

Income / (Loss) before Tax (443) (201) 312 400 544

Income Tax (Expense) / Benefit 75 (15) (98) (123) (159)

Net Income / (Loss) (368) (217) 215 278 385

Income Statement

Source: Consolidated IFRS Financial Statements

43

Note: certain monetary amounts, percentages and other figures included in this presentation are subject to rounding adjustments. Totals therefore do not always add up to exact arithmetic sums.

Page 44: TMK IR PRESENTATION · 7.5 12.8 12.9 52.1 42.9 17.8 17.9 17.6 12.6 7.5 9.2 12.2 74.2 58.1 32.9 36.3 31.3 23.2 15.0 22.0 25.1 102.0 72.7 55.0 62.5 49.6 43.1 35.3 47.7 47.0 3Q14 4Q14

Statement of Financial Position

Source: Consolidated IFRS Financial Statements

44

Note: certain monetary amounts, percentages and other figures included in this presentation are subject to rounding adjustments. Totals therefore do not always add up to exact arithmetic sums.

US$ mln 2015 2014 2013 2012 2011

ASSETS

Cash and Bank Deposits 305 253 93 225 231

Accounts Receivable 512 728 995 914 772

Inventories 785 1,047 1,324 1,346 1,418

Prepayments 113 113 148 180 200

Other Financial Assets - 1 - 4 4

Total Current Assets 1,715 2,142 2,561 2,670 2,625

Assets Classified as Held for Sale -

Total Non-current Assets 2,697 3,508 4,857 4,934 4,507

Total Assets 4,412 5,649 7,419 7,603 7,132

LIABILITIES AND EQUITY

Accounts Payable 682 831 1,111 1,132 1,053

ST Debt 600 764 398 1,068 599

Dividends - - - - -

Other Liabilities 41 48 62 74 53

Total Current Liabilities 1,323 1,643 1,571 2,275 1,705

LT Debt 2,201 2,459 3,296 2,817 3,188

Deferred Tax Liability 110 206 298 302 305

Other Liabilities 64 71 125 125 111

Total Non-current Liabilities 2,374 2,735 3,718 3,244 3,603

Equity 715 1,271 2,130 2,084 1,823

Including Non-Controlling Interest 53 66 96 99 92

Total Liabilities and Equity 4,412 5,649 7,419 7,603 7,132

Net Debt 2,496 2,969 3,600 3,656 3,552

Page 45: TMK IR PRESENTATION · 7.5 12.8 12.9 52.1 42.9 17.8 17.9 17.6 12.6 7.5 9.2 12.2 74.2 58.1 32.9 36.3 31.3 23.2 15.0 22.0 25.1 102.0 72.7 55.0 62.5 49.6 43.1 35.3 47.7 47.0 3Q14 4Q14

Cash Flow

45

Source: Consolidated IFRS Financial Statements

Note: certain monetary amounts, percentages and other figures included in this presentation are subject to rounding adjustments. Totals therefore do not always add up to exact arithmetic sums.

US$ mln 2015 2014 2013 2012 2011

Profit / (Loss) before Income Tax (443) (201) 312 400 544

Adjustments for:

Depreciation and Amortisation 251 304 326 326 336

Net Interest Expense 269 226 245 275 271

Others 552 479 61 39 (101)

Working Capital Changes 105 (159) (159) (34) (156)

Cash Generated from Operations 734 648 786 1,006 894

Income Tax Paid (51) (53) (82) (77) (107)

Net Cash from Operating Activities 684 595 703 929 787

Capex (208) (293) (397) (445) (402)

Acquisitions (2) (60) (38) (33) -

Others 25 10 12 23 25

Net Cash Used in Investing Activities (185) (343) (423) (455) (377)

Net Change in Borrowings (193) 154 (93) (148) 4

Others (187) (206) (313) (341) (339)

Net Cash Used in Financing Activities (381) (53) (407) (489) (335)

Net Foreign Exchange Difference (65) (40) (5) 10 (2)

Cash and Cash Equivalents at January 1 253 93 225 231 158

Cash and Cash Equivalents at YE 305 253 93 225 231

Page 46: TMK IR PRESENTATION · 7.5 12.8 12.9 52.1 42.9 17.8 17.9 17.6 12.6 7.5 9.2 12.2 74.2 58.1 32.9 36.3 31.3 23.2 15.0 22.0 25.1 102.0 72.7 55.0 62.5 49.6 43.1 35.3 47.7 47.0 3Q14 4Q14

Seamless – Core to Profitability

46

Source: Consolidated IFRS financial statements, TMK data

Sales of seamless pipe generated 74% of total Revenue in 3Q 2016 and 70% in 9M 2016.

Gross Profit from seamless pipe sales represented 89% of 3Q 2016 total GP and 87% of 9M 2016 GP.

Gross Profit Margin from seamless pipe sales amounted to 24% in 3Q 2016 and 27% for 9M 2016.

Note:Certain monetary amounts, percentages and other figures included in this presentation are subject to rounding adjustments. Totals therefore do not always add up to exact arithmetic sums.

9M 2016 gross profit breakdown

Seamless87 %

Welded10%

Other operations

3%

U.S.$ mln(unless stated otherwise)

3Q2016QoQ,

%9M 2016

YoY,

%

Sales - Pipes, kt 608 2% 1,774 -2%

Revenue 608 5% 1,709 -14%

Gross profit 146 -7% 444 -10%

Margin, % 24% 26%

Avg revenue/tonne (US$) 1,001 4% 963 -13%

Avg gross profit/tonne (US$) 240 -8% 250 -9%

Sales - Pipes, kt 218 -27% 799 -30%

Revenue 177 -24% 615 -43%

Gross profit 12 -58% 49 -69%

Margin, % 7% 8%

Avg revenue/tonne (US$) 812 4% 770 -19%

Avg gross profit/tonne (US$) 55 -42% 61 -56%

SE

AM

LE

SS

WE

LD

ED

Page 47: TMK IR PRESENTATION · 7.5 12.8 12.9 52.1 42.9 17.8 17.9 17.6 12.6 7.5 9.2 12.2 74.2 58.1 32.9 36.3 31.3 23.2 15.0 22.0 25.1 102.0 72.7 55.0 62.5 49.6 43.1 35.3 47.7 47.0 3Q14 4Q14

Appendix – Capital Structure and Corporate Governance

47

Page 48: TMK IR PRESENTATION · 7.5 12.8 12.9 52.1 42.9 17.8 17.9 17.6 12.6 7.5 9.2 12.2 74.2 58.1 32.9 36.3 31.3 23.2 15.0 22.0 25.1 102.0 72.7 55.0 62.5 49.6 43.1 35.3 47.7 47.0 3Q14 4Q14

Capital Structure

48

Key considerations

TMK’s securities are listed on the London Stock

Exchange, the OTCQX International Premier trading

platform in the U.S. and on Russia’s major stock

exchange – MICEX-RTS.

As of June 30, 2016 32.24% of TMK shares were in

free float, with approximately 50% of them traded in

the form of GDRs on the London Stock Exchange.

Total shares outstanding amount to 1,033,135,366 or

equivalent of 258,283,841 GDRs.

One GDR represents four ordinary shares.

Source: TMK

Capital structure

*The beneficiary is Dmitry Pumpyanskiy, Chairman of the Board of Directors of TMK.

**Including shares of VTB (13.44%) and Rosnano (5.26%)

TMK Steel Holding Ltd, incl. affiliates*

65.05%

Free float**34.95%

Page 49: TMK IR PRESENTATION · 7.5 12.8 12.9 52.1 42.9 17.8 17.9 17.6 12.6 7.5 9.2 12.2 74.2 58.1 32.9 36.3 31.3 23.2 15.0 22.0 25.1 102.0 72.7 55.0 62.5 49.6 43.1 35.3 47.7 47.0 3Q14 4Q14

TMK Corporate Governance

The Board of Directors iscomprised of 11 members,including 5 independent directors,4 non-executive directors and 2executive directors.

The Board of Directors has 3standing committees, chairman ofeach committee is an independentdirector:

– Audit Committee;

– Nomination andRemuneration Committee;

– Strategy Committee.

TMK’s day-to-day operations aremanaged by the CEO and theManagement Board which consistsof eight members.

The Company has an integratedsystem of internal controls whichprovides assurance as to theefficiency and management of risksof operations.

DMITRY PUMPYANSKIY, Chairman of the Board of Directors, non-executive directorBorn in 1964. Graduated from the Sergey Kirov Urals Polytechnic Institute in 1986. PhD in Technical Sciences,Doctor of Economics. Founder and beneficial majority shareholder of TMKRelevant experience: Chairman of the Supervisory Board of Russian Agricultural Bank, Member of the Boardof Directors at Rosagroleasing and SKB-Bank, President and Chairman of the Board of Directors of SinaraGroup,, member of the Management Board of the Russian Union of Industrialists and Entrepreneurs, CEO atTMK, CEO at Sinara Group, Board member at various industrial and financial companies

MIKHAIL ALEKSEEV, Independent director, Chairman of the Nomination and Remuneration Committee.Born in 1964. Graduated from the Moscow Finance Institute in 1986. Doctor of Economics.Relevant experience: Chairman of the Management Board of UniCredit Bank, Chairman of the Board andPresident of “Rossiysky Promyishlenny Bank” (Rosprombank), Senior Vice President and Deputy Chairman ofthe Management Board of Rosbank, Deputy Chairman of the Management Board of ONEXIM Bank, DeputyHead of the General Directorate of the Ministry of Finance of the USSR.

PETER O’BRIEN, Independent director, Chairman of the Audit CommitteeBorn in 1969. Graduated from Duke University (USA) in 1991 and obtained an MBA from Columbia UniversityBusiness School in 2000 and completed the AMP at Harvard Business School in 2011.Relevant experience: Member of the Management Board, Vice President, Head of the Group of FinancialAdvisors to the President of Rosneft, Co-Head of Investment Banking, Executive Director of Morgan Stanley inRussia, Vice President at Troika Dialog Investment Company, Press Officer at the US Treasury.

ROBERT MARK FORESMAN, Independent director, member of the Board of DirectorsBorn in 1968. Graduated from Bucknell University (USA) in 1990 and Harvard University Graduate School ofArts & Sciences in 1993. Obtained a certificate from the Moscow Power Engineering Institute in 1989.Relevant experience: Head of Barclays Capital in Russia, Deputy Chairman of the Management Board atRenaissance Capital, Chairman of the Management Committee for Russia and CIS at Dresdner KleinwortWasserstein, Head of Investment Banking for Russia and CIS at ING Barings.

ALEKSANDER SHOKHIN, Independent director, Chairman of the Strategy CommitteeBorn in 1951. Graduated from the Lomonosov Moscow State University in 1974. PhD, Doctor of Science,Professor.Relevant experience: President of the Russian Union of Industrialists and Entrepreneurs, President of theHigher School of Economics State University, Board member at Lukoil, Russian Railways, member of the PublicChamber of the Russian Federation, member of the State Duma, Minister of Labour and Employment andMinister of Economic Affairs, Head of the Russian Agency for International Cooperation and Development,twice appointed as Deputy Head of the Russian Government, Russia’s representative to IMF and World Bank.

SERGEY KRAVCHENKO, Independent director, member of the Board of DirectorsBorn in 1960. Graduated from the Moscow State University of Mechanical Engineering in 1982. Professor,Doctor of Technical Science/Relevant experience: President of Boeing Russia and CIS since 2002, responsible for the company’s businessdevelopment in Russia and CIS. Head of representative office of Boeing Russia and CIS. Prior to joining Boeing in1992 was a lead member of the Russian Academy of Sciences, a teacher in Russia and a science advisor in the US,Europe and Asia.

Key considerations

49

Page 50: TMK IR PRESENTATION · 7.5 12.8 12.9 52.1 42.9 17.8 17.9 17.6 12.6 7.5 9.2 12.2 74.2 58.1 32.9 36.3 31.3 23.2 15.0 22.0 25.1 102.0 72.7 55.0 62.5 49.6 43.1 35.3 47.7 47.0 3Q14 4Q14

Appendix – TMK Products

50

Page 51: TMK IR PRESENTATION · 7.5 12.8 12.9 52.1 42.9 17.8 17.9 17.6 12.6 7.5 9.2 12.2 74.2 58.1 32.9 36.3 31.3 23.2 15.0 22.0 25.1 102.0 72.7 55.0 62.5 49.6 43.1 35.3 47.7 47.0 3Q14 4Q14

Wide Range of Products, Focus on Oil and Gas

Well equipment precision manufacturing, tools’ rental, supervising, inventory management, threading and coating services.

Oilfield Services

Premium

Premium connections are proprietary value-added products used to connect OCTG pipes and are used in sour, deep well, off-shore, low temperature and other high-pressure applications.

Premium Connections

(TMK UP)

Welded

Threaded pipes for the oil and gas industry including drill pipe, casing and tubing.

OCTG

The short-distance transportation of crude oil, oil products and natural gas.

Line Pipe

Construction of trunk pipeline systems for the long distance transportation of natural gas, crude oil and petroleum products.Large-

Diameter

Wide array of applications and industries, including utilities and agriculture.

Industrial

Seamless

Threaded pipes for the oil and gas industry including drill pipe, casing and tubing.

OCTG

The short-distance transportation of crude oil, oil products and natural gas.

Line Pipe

Automotive, machine building, and power generation sectors.

Industrial

52

Page 52: TMK IR PRESENTATION · 7.5 12.8 12.9 52.1 42.9 17.8 17.9 17.6 12.6 7.5 9.2 12.2 74.2 58.1 32.9 36.3 31.3 23.2 15.0 22.0 25.1 102.0 72.7 55.0 62.5 49.6 43.1 35.3 47.7 47.0 3Q14 4Q14

Premium Solutions: TMK UP

52

ULTRA QX

2009

ULTRA CX

2008

ULTRA FX

2003

ULTRA FJ

2003

Cal IV

ULTRA DQX

2011

Cal IICal IVCal IV Cal II

ULTRA DQXHT

2013

Cal II

ULTRA SFII

2013TMK BPN

2013

TMK-2S

2013

ULTRA GX

2016

TWCCEPCal IV

SXC

2009ULTRA QX

TORQ2016

ULTRA SF

2003

TMK GF

2005

TMK PF

2007

Cal IV

TMK FMC

2005

TMK TTL 01

2005

TMK CS

2005

ТМК 1

2004

TMK FMT

2008

TMK PF ET

2008

TMK TDS

2010

TMK CWB

2011

Cal IV

TMK PF Tubing

2012

Cal IVCal II Cal IICal IV

TMK UP Magna2013

TMK UPCentum

2014

• Horizontal and extended reach

• Drilling with casing

• Steam-Assisted Gravity Drainage (SAGD)

• Connections are available with GreenWell

environment friendly technology

Unique range of Premium products

• Onshore/offshore

• Sour gas

• Thermal

• Arctic

Page 53: TMK IR PRESENTATION · 7.5 12.8 12.9 52.1 42.9 17.8 17.9 17.6 12.6 7.5 9.2 12.2 74.2 58.1 32.9 36.3 31.3 23.2 15.0 22.0 25.1 102.0 72.7 55.0 62.5 49.6 43.1 35.3 47.7 47.0 3Q14 4Q14

Utilisation of TMK Pipe Products in Oil and Gas Industry

OCTG – Oil Country Tubular Goods (drilling, casing, tubing) used for oil & gas exploration, well fixing and oil & gas production(40% of total sales in 9M 2016);

Line pipe – used for short distance transportation of crude oil, oil products and natural gas (23% of total sales in 9M 2016);

LDP - large diameter pipe used for construction of trunk pipeline systems for long distance transportation of natural gas, crude oil and petroleum products (15% in total sales in 9M 2016).

53

Page 54: TMK IR PRESENTATION · 7.5 12.8 12.9 52.1 42.9 17.8 17.9 17.6 12.6 7.5 9.2 12.2 74.2 58.1 32.9 36.3 31.3 23.2 15.0 22.0 25.1 102.0 72.7 55.0 62.5 49.6 43.1 35.3 47.7 47.0 3Q14 4Q14

Thank You

TMK Investor Relations

40/2a, Pokrovka Street, Moscow, 105062, Russia

+7 (495) 775-7600

[email protected]

54