TM1 1Summary Travel Time Reliability Memo track changes FINAL

9
Memorandum 1.1 I-5 Medford Viaduct Planning & Environmental Study Page 1 Memorandum 1.1 January 15, 2016 To: Lisa Cornutt and Anna Henson, Oregon Department of Transportation, Region 3 From: Marc Butorac, PE, PTOE, Shaun Quayle, PE, and Patrick Marnell Date: January 15, 2016 Subject: Task 1.1 Travel Time Reliability Memorandum Introduction The objective of this travel time reliability memorandum is to establish the frequency, magnitude, locations, and sources of congestion which lead to drops in travel time reliability within the I-5 Medford Viaduct study area specifically within the elevated viaduct segment and immediately north and south of the viaduct. The analysis also assessed potential contributing factors (weather, time of day, crashes, and other incidents). The HERE TM data set (also commonly called the National Performance Management Research Data Set) contains average vehicle travel times and speeds collected using “probe vehicles”. Probe vehicle data is obtained from sources such as cell phones and portable navigation devices. This data is collected for defined roadway segments know as traffic message channels (TMCs). ODOT provided HERE™ travel time and speed data, as permitted by the “Here Licenses”, from October 2011 to July 2015 (46 months). HERE™ data prior to October 2011 is not available. ODOT provided data for six TMCs in the project vicinity. Figure 1 displays a Map of the TMCs in the project area. This memorandum will focus in particular on the two TMCs which contain (but are not limited to) the Medford Viaduct. These TMCs will subsequently be referred to as the “Viaduct TMCs”. TMC 114P04717 includes northbound traffic between the North and South Medford interchanges which encompasses the Viaduct. TMC 114N04716 includes southbound traffic between the North and South Medford interchanges which encompasses the Viaduct. The following metrics were used to asses travel time reliability in the project area. Planning Time Index (PTI) - The ratio of the 95th percentile travel time to the free-flow travel time. This value can be viewed as the multiplier that one should apply to their “no traffic commute” to insure they will arrive at work, on time, 95 percent of the time. As this value increases, the less reliable the commute becomes, and the more “buffer” time one needs to build into travel. o For example, a 10 minute commute under light traffic conditions and has a planning time index (PTI) of 1.2, then the commuter needs to budget 12 minutes to ensure on-time arrival 95% of the time. The purpose of this memorandum and the other early anchoring activity memorandums in Phase 1A of the project is to inform the Draft Problem Statement and guide further development of the project.

Transcript of TM1 1Summary Travel Time Reliability Memo track changes FINAL

Memorandum 1.1  

I-5 Medford Viaduct Planning & Environmental Study Page 1 Memorandum 1.1 January 15, 2016

To: Lisa Cornutt and Anna Henson, Oregon Department of Transportation, Region 3

From: Marc Butorac, PE, PTOE, Shaun Quayle, PE, and Patrick Marnell

Date: January 15, 2016

Subject: Task 1.1 Travel Time Reliability Memorandum

Introduction

The objective of this travel time reliability memorandum is to establish the frequency, magnitude, locations, and sources of congestion which lead to drops in travel time reliability within the I-5 Medford Viaduct study area specifically within the elevated viaduct segment and immediately north and south of the viaduct. The analysis also assessed potential contributing factors (weather, time of day, crashes, and other incidents).

The HERETM data set (also commonly called the National Performance Management Research Data Set) contains average vehicle travel times and speeds collected using “probe vehicles”. Probe vehicle data is obtained from sources such as cell phones and portable navigation devices. This data is collected for defined roadway segments know as traffic message channels (TMCs).

ODOT provided HERE™ travel time and speed data, as permitted by the “Here Licenses”, from October 2011 to July 2015 (46 months). HERE™ data prior to October 2011 is not available. ODOT provided data for six TMCs in the project vicinity. Figure 1 displays a Map of the TMCs in the project area. This memorandum will focus in particular on the two TMCs which contain (but are not limited to) the Medford Viaduct. These TMCs will subsequently be referred to as the “Viaduct TMCs”.

TMC 114P04717 includes northbound traffic between the North and South Medford interchanges which encompasses the Viaduct.

TMC 114N04716 includes southbound traffic between the North and South Medford interchanges which encompasses the Viaduct.

The following metrics were used to asses travel time reliability in the project area.

Planning Time Index (PTI) - The ratio of the 95th percentile travel time to the free-flow travel time. This value can be viewed as the multiplier that one should apply to their “no traffic commute” to insure they will arrive at work, on time, 95 percent of the time. As this value increases, the less reliable the commute becomes, and the more “buffer” time one needs to build into travel.

o For example, a 10 minute commute under light traffic conditions and has a planning time index (PTI) of 1.2, then the commuter needs to budget 12 minutes to ensure on-time arrival 95% of the time.

The purpose of this memorandum and the other early anchoring activity memorandums 

in Phase 1A of the project is to inform the Draft Problem Statement and guide further 

development of the project.

Memorandum 1.1  

I-5 Medford Viaduct Planning & Environmental Study Page 2 Memorandum 1.1 January 15, 2016

Average Speed - The observed average speed of the probe vehicles in a TMC, recorded in 5-minute bins.

Average Travel Time - The observed average travel time that probe vehicles took to traverse a TMC, recorded in 5-minute bins.

Slowing Events – Slowing events were identified as two or more consecutive 5 minute periods with average speeds recorded below 45 miles per hour (MPH).

Key Findings

The Viaduct TMCs had slightly lower PTIs than the adjacent Interstate-5 (I-5) TMCs. As such, the Viaduct segment TMCs showed greater travel time reliability than the adjacent TMCs.

Year 2014 average speeds data indicated that the total number of recorded slowing events was low.

Seasonal trend analysis of October to April (more rainy/snowy days) vs. May to September (more clear, dry days) indicates little to no difference in reported average speeds.

Oregon DOT Traffic Operations Center System (TOCS) reported incidents aligned with approximately 33 percent of slowing events. Crash Reports aligned with approximately 6 percent of slowing events. Most events occurred outside of peak periods.

114P04718

114N04715

114N04717

114P04716

114N04716114P04717

Rouge Valley Int'lMedford Airport

E Mcandrews Rd

Kin

gs

Hw

y

Garfield St

Stewart AveN

Foo

thill

Rd

Tab

le R

ock

Rd

W Main StW 8th St

S Front S

t

S R

iverside Ave

NM

ainSt

Owen Dr

N P

acific Hw

y

WM

candr

ews

Rd

N P

hoe

nix

Rd

SC

olum

bus

Av e

NC

entral AveE Main St

Bid

dle

Rd

S Pacific Hw

y

Cra

ter

La

ke A

ve

Sage RdRossanley Dr

E Barnett Rd

Cra

ter

La

keH

wy

Co

urt

St

5

Phoenix

Central Point

Medford

I-5 Medford Viaduct Planning & Environmental Study December 2015

Figure

1Traffic Message Channels MapMedford, Oregon

H:\pr

ojfile

\1820

3 - M

edfor

d I-5

Viadu

ct Stu

dy\gi

s\Tas

k 1.1\

TMC

Map.m

xd - j

somm

erville

- 4:1

0 PM

12/2/

2015

Coordinate System: NAD 1983 StatePlane Oregon South FIPS 3602 Feet

Viaduct

05001,0001,5002,0002,5003,0003,5004,000 Feet0 0.5 1 Miles

Viaduct

Memorandum 1.1  

I-5 Medford Viaduct Planning & Environmental Study Page 4 Memorandum 1.1 January 15, 2016

Travel Time/Planning Time Index Analysis

The 46 months of HERE™ travel time and speed data (for AM and PM peak periods from 7:00-9:00AM and 4:00-6:00PM) was compiled and sorted by TMC. Free flow travel times were determined based on the known length of each TMC using the off-period (10:00 PM to 4:00 AM) 85th percentile speed as free flow speed of vehicles. The 95th percentile travel times for each TMC were calculated from the recorded data. This data was then used to calculate the PTI as displayed in Table 1.

Table1:PlanningTimeIndex

TMC Length (feet) 

Observed 5%  Speed (MPH) 

Observed Mean Speed (MPH) 

Off‐Period 85%  Speed 

(MPH) 

Calculated Free Flow Travel Time (minutes) 

Observed 95% Travel Time 

(minutes)  PTI 

Northbound South of Viaduct 114P04716  16468  51.98  57.16  59.72  2.97  3.60  1.15 

Northbound Viaduct 114P04717  14714  52.25  56.89  59.71  2.70  3.20  1.14 

Northbound North of Viaduct 114P04718  13130  52.05  57.80  60.90  2.32  2.87  1.17 

Southbound North of Viaduct 114N04717  13644  51.11  57.40  60.41  2.40  3.03  1.18 

Southbound Viaduct 114N04716  13893  51.48  56.34  59.20  2.57  3.07  1.15 

 Southbound South of Viaduct 114N04715  16615  49.81  55.66  59.45  3.04  3.79  1.19 

Seasonal Variation Analysis

The average speeds observed in the 46 months of HERE™ speed data (for all times of day) within the two Viaduct TMCs were analyzed to determine if inclement weather has a strong effect on speeds. For this analysis, data was separated into two seasonal periods.

April-September representing the months with less precipitation and inclement weather events.

October-March representing the months with more precipitation and inclement weather events.

Figures 2 and 3 display the observed average speeds, separated into 10 MPH bins, as a percentage of the total observations for both northbound and southbound Viaduct TMCs. Although, these figures show some seasonal variation in speeds, this variation primarily occurs at speeds above 50 MPH, meaning any slowdowns are relatively minor in nature when observed in aggregate.

Memorandum 1.1  

I-5 Medford Viaduct Planning & Environmental Study Page 5 Memorandum 1.1 January 15, 2016

Figure2:SeasonalSpeedVariations‐NorthboundViaductTMC

 

 

Figure3:SeasonalSpeedVariations‐SouthboundViaductTMC

 

0.1% 0.2% 0.3% 1.7%

81.2%

15.9%

0.5% 0.0%0.2% 0.1% 0.4% 1.7%

75.9%

21.0%

0.7% 0.0%0.0%

10.0%

20.0%

30.0%

40.0%

50.0%

60.0%

70.0%

80.0%

90.0%

100.0%

>20 21‐30 31‐40 41‐50 51‐60 61‐70 71‐80 <80

Percent of observed average

 speeds

Speed Bins (MPH)

April ‐September

October ‐March

0.1% 0.1% 0.2% 1.9%

85.7%

11.7%

0.4% 0.0%0.2% 0.1% 0.3%2.9%

85.4%

10.8%

0.3% 0.0%0.0%

10.0%

20.0%

30.0%

40.0%

50.0%

60.0%

70.0%

80.0%

90.0%

100.0%

>20 21‐30 31‐40 41‐50 51‐60 61‐70 71‐80 <80

Percent of observed average

 speeds

Speed Bins (MPH)

April ‐September

October ‐March

Memorandum 1.1  

I-5 Medford Viaduct Planning & Environmental Study Page 6 Memorandum 1.1 January 15, 2016

Time of Day Analysis

To illustrate potential time based changes in average speed, the 95th percentile and 5th percentile average speeds observed within the Viaduct TMCs during year 2014 were plotted by hour. As, shown in Figures 4 and 5 the Viaduct TMCs show only small variations in speed. Further at no time of day was the 5th percentile speed recorded as less than 49 MPH.

Figure4:TimeofDayVariations‐NorthboundViaductTMC

Figure5:TimeofDayVariations‐SouthboundViaductTMC

40

45

50

55

60

65

70

12:00 AM

1:00 AM

2:00 AM

3:00 AM

4:00 AM

5:00 AM

6:00 AM

7:00 AM

8:00 AM

9:00 AM

10:00 AM

11:00 AM

12:00 PM

1:00 PM

2:00 PM

3:00 PM

4:00 PM

5:00 PM

6:00 PM

7:00 PM

8:00 PM

9:00 PM

10:00 PM

11:00 PM

Average

 Speed (MPH)

Time of Day

95thPecentile

Mean

5thPercentile

40

45

50

55

60

65

70

12:00 AM

1:00 AM

2:00 AM

3:00 AM

4:00 AM

5:00 AM

6:00 AM

7:00 AM

8:00 AM

9:00 AM

10:00 AM

11:00 AM

12:00 PM

1:00 PM

2:00 PM

3:00 PM

4:00 PM

5:00 PM

6:00 PM

7:00 PM

8:00 PM

9:00 PM

10:00 PM

Average

 Speed (MPH)

Time of Day

95th Pecentile

Mean

5th Percentile

Memorandum 1.1  

I-5 Medford Viaduct Planning & Environmental Study Page 7 Memorandum 1.1 January 15, 2016

Slowing Events

To better understand the specific instances of slowing, the year 2014 data (all days) for the two Viaduct TMCs was analyzed to identify the frequency of slowing events.

Slowing events were identified as two consecutive 5 minute periods with average speeds recorded below a 45 MPH.

o On several occasions, based on engineering judgment, slowing events were continued though a single 5 minute period that did not meet the 45 MPH threshold.

o Within these slowing events, events that included a 10 minute period (or greater) of slowing to 30 MPH or less were also identified.

o Slowing events that occurred during the weekday AM peak period (7-9:00 AM) and the weekday PM peak period (4-6:00 PM) were also identified.

Table2:2014SlowingEventsunder45MPH

TMC 

Slowing Events   Slowing Events with 30 MPH periods 

Number of 

Events 

Events During AM Peak 

Events During PM Peak 

Mean Duration (minutes) 

Range of Durations (minutes) 

Number of 

Events 

Events During AM Peak 

Events During PM Peak 

Mean Duration (minutes) 

Range of Durations (minutes) 

Northbound North of Viaduct 114P04718 

42  6  2  13  10‐55  5  2  1  24  10‐55 

Northbound Viaduct 114P04717 

52  7  7  25  10‐285  17  4  5  54  10‐285 

Northbound South of Viaduct 114P04716 

51  3  7  17  10‐145  9  1  3  46  10‐145 

Southbound North of Viaduct 114N04717 

72  8  5  16  10‐135  17  1  2  33  10‐135 

Southbound Viaduct 114N04716  44  4  9  21  10‐130  19  1  5  33  10‐130 

Southbound South of Viaduct 114N04715 

76  10  20  55  10‐380  32  2  17  112  10‐380 

 

 

The total number of recorded slowing events is low. o Southbound traffic experienced a greater number of slowing events on average

for all TMCs. o On average 1-2 slowing events were recoded per month during weekday AM or

PM peak periods within the Viaduct TMCs. Southbound traffic in the Viaduct TMC showed fewer slowing events than the adjacent I-

5 TMCs. Northbound traffic showed approximately the same number of slowing events as the adjacent I-5 TMCs.

Southbound traffic in the I-5 TMC south of the Viaduct showed more periods of 30 MPH slowing than the other TMCs.

Memorandum 1.1  

I-5 Medford Viaduct Planning & Environmental Study Page 8 Memorandum 1.1 January 15, 2016

For average northbound traffic in the Viaduct TMC: o One slowing event occurred every 7 days. o One slowing event with 30 MPH slowing occurred every 19 days.

For average southbound traffic in the Viaduct TMC: o One slowing event occurred every 8 days. o One slowing event with 30 MPH slowing occurred every 21 days.

Slowing events are likely the result of:

Localized congestion (on-off ramp maneuvers, lane change friction, slow moving vehicles), which is not specified in the source travel time data (HERETM), and/or

Inclement weather and/or Incident events, which may include crashes, stalled vehicles, or debris/animal on

roadway, or shoulder vehicle stoppages. It is believed that the TOCS incident data in the following section is incomplete, as the log is limited to incidents reported to ODOT’s TOC in 2014 by state police and 911 call centers.

 

Incident and Crash Analysis

The slowing events identified above were compared to both ODOT TOCS incident data and ODOT crash reports, within the bounds of the Viaduct TMCs, for year 2014. Due to reporting standards, the crash reports contain few events than the TOCS incident data (which include crashes and several other types of incidents). Table 3 summarizes the percent matches between the each data source and the identified slowing events.

Table3:IncidentandCrashComparison

TMC Slowing Events 

TOCS Incident Data Crash Reports

Total 2014 TOCS 

Incidents 

TOCS Matches 

Percent Match 

Total 2014 Reported Crashes 

Crash Report Matches 

Percent Match 

Northbound Viaduct 114P04717 

52 

429 

17  33% 

15  6  6% Southbound Viaduct  

114N04716  44  15  34% 

Opportunities

The above analysis points to a slightly higher degree of travel time reliability on the I-5 viaduct as compared to the adjacent immediate upstream and downstream sections of I-5. Up to one-third of the slow down events (under 45 miles per hour) are related to reported crashes or incidents, which limit capacity in a non-recurring manner. Treatments to enhance roadway

Memorandum 1.1  

I-5 Medford Viaduct Planning & Environmental Study Page 9 Memorandum 1.1 January 15, 2016

safety and emergency responder access would be of benefit to the I-5 viaduct and the surrounding I-5 project area.

These opportunities for safety and access improvements will be investigated as part of future project phases.

Attachments:

HERE Data (electronic document) TOCS Incident Data (electronic document) Reference Technical Memorandum #1.4 for crash data