TIVIT Interactive: A Retrospect on the Future Internet Program
-
Upload
digile -
Category
Technology
-
view
519 -
download
0
Transcript of TIVIT Interactive: A Retrospect on the Future Internet Program
![Page 1: TIVIT Interactive: A Retrospect on the Future Internet Program](https://reader030.fdocuments.us/reader030/viewer/2022032616/55a74f7e1a28ab5d018b4683/html5/thumbnails/1.jpg)
A restrospect on the Future Internet program
Jukka Manner, Aalto University
ICT SHOK on Future Internet
2.5.2012
![Page 2: TIVIT Interactive: A Retrospect on the Future Internet Program](https://reader030.fdocuments.us/reader030/viewer/2022032616/55a74f7e1a28ab5d018b4683/html5/thumbnails/2.jpg)
Disclaimer
This presentation is based on views and opinions from the academic coordinator and academic partners in an ICT SHOK program.
Companies and other programs will have different opinions.
![Page 3: TIVIT Interactive: A Retrospect on the Future Internet Program](https://reader030.fdocuments.us/reader030/viewer/2022032616/55a74f7e1a28ab5d018b4683/html5/thumbnails/3.jpg)
Three parts
1. Background and results
2. A retrospect on the Future Internet program
3. Some thoughts on SHOKs
![Page 4: TIVIT Interactive: A Retrospect on the Future Internet Program](https://reader030.fdocuments.us/reader030/viewer/2022032616/55a74f7e1a28ab5d018b4683/html5/thumbnails/4.jpg)
Fact sheet
• Timeline 1.4.2008-30.4.2012: 4 years
• Total budget: 27M€ (Tekes 60%)
• Work effort done: 230 PY
![Page 5: TIVIT Interactive: A Retrospect on the Future Internet Program](https://reader030.fdocuments.us/reader030/viewer/2022032616/55a74f7e1a28ab5d018b4683/html5/thumbnails/5.jpg)
Topics
1. Routing and data transport – Fixed and mobile networks, multi-path, multi-radio
– Software performance (switch, router)
– Transport algorithms (wireless focus)
– Challenging environments (no infrastructure)
2. Energy-efficiency – Smart phones, Bluetooth, sensors
3. Information-driven networks – Evolution of peer-to-peer
4. Network security – Botnets, unwanted traffic, trust, anomaly detection
![Page 6: TIVIT Interactive: A Retrospect on the Future Internet Program](https://reader030.fdocuments.us/reader030/viewer/2022032616/55a74f7e1a28ab5d018b4683/html5/thumbnails/6.jpg)
Research results
• Total number of publications: 300+
–Conferences, journals: 200
–Standards contributions: 50
–University theses: 50
• Open source software packages: 12
![Page 7: TIVIT Interactive: A Retrospect on the Future Internet Program](https://reader030.fdocuments.us/reader030/viewer/2022032616/55a74f7e1a28ab5d018b4683/html5/thumbnails/7.jpg)
PhD-level results
• During the project:
–14 PhD theses
• Aalto (10), TUT (2), UH (2)
• After the project:
–11 Aalto and one UH PhD theses got the topic and seed funding from FI
![Page 8: TIVIT Interactive: A Retrospect on the Future Internet Program](https://reader030.fdocuments.us/reader030/viewer/2022032616/55a74f7e1a28ab5d018b4683/html5/thumbnails/8.jpg)
Three parts
1. Background and results
2. A retrospect on the Future Internet program
3. Some thoughts on SHOKs
![Page 9: TIVIT Interactive: A Retrospect on the Future Internet Program](https://reader030.fdocuments.us/reader030/viewer/2022032616/55a74f7e1a28ab5d018b4683/html5/thumbnails/9.jpg)
The good
• Contributions to science and standards
–Great number of top publications, SDOs
–Many high-quality contributions to R&D
• Good spirit
• Good level of funding in general
• Very few internal fights
• Freedom in pursuing the agreed goals
• Not overly bureaucratic
![Page 10: TIVIT Interactive: A Retrospect on the Future Internet Program](https://reader030.fdocuments.us/reader030/viewer/2022032616/55a74f7e1a28ab5d018b4683/html5/thumbnails/10.jpg)
The bad • Much work done in solo
– Could have done much better joint work
• Research topics decided by companies – Limits research work to companies’ current focus
• “Game” in proposing academic work – Search and motivate a company sponsor – The more you propose, the more you get after cuts – Either 100-250% increases, or double PY cost
• Many topics only studied for a short time – Unpredictable funding and collaboration
• Problems with publication approval process • WP leadership mostly non-existing
– Exception: Hannu Flinck (NSN), best WP leader by far
![Page 11: TIVIT Interactive: A Retrospect on the Future Internet Program](https://reader030.fdocuments.us/reader030/viewer/2022032616/55a74f7e1a28ab5d018b4683/html5/thumbnails/11.jpg)
Three parts
1. Background and results
2. A retrospect on the Future Internet program
3. Some thoughts on SHOKs
![Page 12: TIVIT Interactive: A Retrospect on the Future Internet Program](https://reader030.fdocuments.us/reader030/viewer/2022032616/55a74f7e1a28ab5d018b4683/html5/thumbnails/12.jpg)
The goal of SHOKs
“Research carried out by the SHOKs is strategic, pre-commercial, and as a rule not associated with short-term market goals. As the time span of research usually is 5 - 10 years at minimum, competitors may take part in the same programmes.”
![Page 13: TIVIT Interactive: A Retrospect on the Future Internet Program](https://reader030.fdocuments.us/reader030/viewer/2022032616/55a74f7e1a28ab5d018b4683/html5/thumbnails/13.jpg)
In good and bad • FI has followed this principle quite well
– Little product-oriented work from researchers themselves
• In some programs, this has not materialized – Short-term topics, tight control over the work, bureaucracy,
strict reporting (worse than EU?) – Partners that can be changed on the fly
• PhD-level high quality results take 4 years – Little long-term planning and resources
• Companies use SHOK funding for their own product-oriented short-term goals – Does not fulfill long-term 5-10 year strategic goals
• Funding is based on company work that can change without prior notice
• FI was abandoned ahead of schedule partly due to too scientific research
![Page 14: TIVIT Interactive: A Retrospect on the Future Internet Program](https://reader030.fdocuments.us/reader030/viewer/2022032616/55a74f7e1a28ab5d018b4683/html5/thumbnails/14.jpg)
Some wishes for SHOKs
• Long-term planning and commitment –2-3 years absolute minimum
• Funding for bottom-up ideas –100% currently decided by companies
• Low overhead in management • SHOKs are not a substitute for company
product development support • Don’t penalize universities when
companies fail
![Page 15: TIVIT Interactive: A Retrospect on the Future Internet Program](https://reader030.fdocuments.us/reader030/viewer/2022032616/55a74f7e1a28ab5d018b4683/html5/thumbnails/15.jpg)
Thank you www.futureinternet.fi
Jukka Manner, Aalto University
ICT SHOK on Future Internet
2.5.2012